Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CFI dismissed the case and applied the ruling in Fua Cun vs. Summers and No share of stock against which the corporation holds any
China Banking Corporation which states that that payment of one-half of unpaid claim shall be transferable on the books of the
the subscription does not entitle the subscriber to a certificate of stock for corporation.
one-half of the number of shares subscribed. SEC. 36. (re voting trust agreement) ...
Issue: The certificates of stock so transferred shall be surrendered
and cancelled, and new certificates therefor issued to such
person or persons, or corporation, as such trustee or
trustees, in which new certificates it shall appear that they A corporation cannot release an original subscriber from paying for his
are issued pursuant to said agreement. shares without a valuable consideration or without the unanimous consent
of the stockholders.
xxx xxx xxx
Additional info:
Nava argues that under Sec. 37, a certificate of stock may be issued for
As prescribed in Sec. 35, shares of stock may be transferred by delivery to shares the par value of which have already been paid for although the entire
the transferee of the certificate properly indorsed. Title may be vested in
subscription has not been fully paid. Nava relies on Baltazar v Lingayen Gulf
the transferee by delivery of the certificate with a written assignment or Electric Power Co., Inc. where it was held that Sec. 37 "requires as a
indorsement thereof. There should be compliance with the mode of transfer condition before a shareholder can vote his shares that his full subscription
prescribed by law. be paid in the case of no par value stock; and in case of stock corporation
The usual practice is for the stockholder to sign the form on the back of the with par value, the stockholder can vote the shares fully paid by him only,
stock certificate. The certificate may thereafter be transferred from one irrespective of the unpaid delinquent shares".
person to another. If the holder of the certificate desires to assume the legal There is no parallelism between this case and the Baltazar case. In Baltazar,
rights of a shareholder to enable him to vote at corporate elections and to the stockholder, an incorporator, was the holder of a certificate of stock for
receive dividends, he fills up the blanks in the form by inserting his own the shares the par value of which had been paid by him. The issue was
name as transferee. Then he delivers the certificate to the secretary of the whether the said shares had voting rights although the incorporator had not
corporation so that the transfer may be entered in the corporation's books. paid fully the total amount of his subscription. That is not the issue in this
The certificate is then surrendered and a new one issued to the transferee.
case.
That procedure cannot be followed in the instant case because the 20 In the Baltazar case, it was held that where a stockholder subscribed to a
shares are not covered by any certificate of stock in Po's name. Moreover, certain number of shares with par value and he made a partial payment and
the corporation has a claim on the said shares for the unpaid balance of Po's was issued a certificate for the shares covered by his partial payment, he is
subscription. A stock subscription is a subsisting liability from the time the
entitled to vote the said shares, although he has not paid the balance of his
subscription is made. The subscriber is as much bound to pay his subscription and a call or demand had been made for the payment of the
subscription as he would be to pay any other debt. The right of the par value of the delinquent shares.
corporation to demand payment is no less incontestable.
No stock certificate was issued to Po. Without stock certificate, which is the
evidence of ownership of corporate stock, the assignment of corporate
shares is effective only between the parties to the transaction.