Professional Documents
Culture Documents
North-Holland
The purpose of this study is to develop an approach for unified constitutive modeling based on experimentally determined
back stress and overstress. Back stress and overstress were experimentally determined for Type 316 stainless steel at 600°C,
by analyzing the unloading curve for the stress-strain response of cyclic strain tests. The result has indicated that the cyclic
strain hardening behavior is mainly caused by hardening in the back stress. A phenomenological unified constitutive model
in which the back stress and drag stress are taken as the internal state variables is proposed, and has been shown that this
model is able to simulate the cyclic inelastic behavior.
O" 400r o
Continuous cycling AEt=QOI,Et=IO'~-I,600 C
O" mox
3°°t o
~ ~ o m ox I O0 0
2oo ° o o Z&~_~,~_~___~_,>,~_~_~$o~
o A AA-- -- D max
O_ lOOz ao Boo ~u ~r~'[~--6-°c%E°o
o I I I ----
// ~ ~,
0 _ 100 ~ [] [] 0 li] rain
/# -200 c o o
~ ~ 2-~o--c~--o~-~__~
z~z~
.... "z~'~-E"~"~ "a'~L~- % '"
o
Oo O
Fig. 1. Stress-strain response during unloading and determi- -300 o o ~¢.~__o~_o~o_e_ ~,.
nation of back stress and overstress.
Nf/2 ~f
-400 , , ~,
316 Stainless steel , 600"C 10 0 101 10 2 10 5 10 4
Continuous cycling Quadratic Number of cycles
300 ~Et= OOl DoO~ Fig. 3. Cyclic strain hardening behavior for peak stress, back
I~t : 10-3 S"1 00000
stress and overstress.
Nf/2 cycle /L~iinear
(b) 5 o o
(a) Monotonic stress-strain relation Cyclic stress-strain relation
600% Ao"
2oo 600°C
G
~o 4 0 0
. / 2 --
~ /o
..=,~3 0 0 /o o ~ AGb
E / o I ~ - 2
O A~
lOO 200 /o IA/k~
(/3 &0"^
,~.rn_._m_.-U . . . . . D - - ~'-~"
100
012 014 016 018 ~00_~ 0 012 0'.4 016 018 G~o-~
Inelastic strain Ein Inelastic strain amplitude A ~ i n / 2
Fig. 4. (a) Monotonic and (b) cyclic stress-, back stress-and overstress-ine]astic strain relations.
K. Taguchi, T. Uno / Determination of internal state variables 329
All unloading curves in the symmetric continuous is observed and is independent of the strain range,
cycles with a strain rate of 10 -3 s -1 and strain ranges though the scatter in the data points is fairly large. The
of 0.005 through 0.02 were analyzed to generate values same relationship was also seen in early cycles. The
for the back stress O-b and overstress % defined as inelastic strain rate was very sensitive to the overstress
follows. for inelastic strain rates exceeding about 10 -5 s-1, and
the overstress dependence of the inelastic strain rate
O-peak = {7"peak _ O - p e a k ,
gradually fell when the inelastic strain rate was lower.
where the superscript "peak" means "maximum" at a
tensile peak or "minimum" at a compressive peak.
It was reported t h a t (Topeak increased when the un- 4. Unified constitutive modeling
loading strain rate decreased, because of the recovery
of the back stress during the unloading period. It has Modeling of unified constitutive equations with the
been found that the recovery effect is negligible when experimentally determined back stress and overstress
the unloading strain rate is higher than about 10 3 s - ] was carried out. Typical constitutive equations were
[5-7]. Hence, the stress-strain data obtained at an applied, because the purpose of this study was to
unloading strain rate of 10 -3 s -1 were used in this develop an approach to modeling on the basis of the
determination approach. properties of the back stress and overstress but not to
The tested steel showed a typical cyclic strain hard- propose a new type of constitutive model.
ening behavior, as indicated in fig. 3. It is seen in fig. 3 The proposed constitutive equations are expressed
that both the back stress and the overstress show a in the following form under uniaxial stress conditions:
cyclic strain hardening behavior in their early cycles
d" = E ( ~ I - Ein), (1)
and become constant during almost all cycles until
failure. The monotonic and cyclic stress-, back stress-, Ein = F[o- - O ' b , D[q 1] ] sgn(o- - O ' b ) , (2)
and overstress-inelastic strain relations are shown in
figs. 4(a) and (b), respectively. It is seen in figs. 4(a) ~b = ,~, + ,~2, (3)
and (b) that the back stress is strongly dependent on
/~1 = c ] ( n ] e i n - R , I ~ , I ) , (4)
the inelastic strain range.
If the back stress is assumed to be held constant l~2=C2(B[q2]~in-R2]~-inl) -C31R21h2-1R2, (5)
during a short hoidtime period, the relationship be-
tween the overstress ratio and the inelastic strain rate where or, O-b, O---O-b, et, ein and E denote stress, back
is given in fig. 5, where the overstress ratio was defined stress, overstress, total strain, inelastic strain, and
as the overstress during the holdtime divided by that at Young's modulus, respectively, and ( . ) represents the
the beginning of the strain hold. A unique relationship partial derivative with respect to time. [2"] signifies a
function of 2', and B1, C], C 2, C 3 and h 2 are material
constants.
i0 "3 Based on the overstress concept, it is assumed that
600"C an inelastic strain rate is a function of overstress,
t H= 36C0s
.E 10.4 A ~ t =0.01 : A (a - O-b), and drag stress, D. The drag stress is applied
.k0
0.007 : v . ~ as a variable for describing the cycle dependence of
10-5 overstress. Cyclic strain hardening is caused by the
E 10-6
fs}-f
v v hardening of drag stress and back stress. Back stress is
divided into two terms, R] and R 2 in order to describe
the stress-strain hysteresis relation. Cyclic hardening is
.o caused by the hardening of R 2. Evolution equations
•~ 10.7
for R] and R 2 are of the Bailey-Orwan type. The last
I I L 1
term of eq. (5) is the thermal recovery term. For
iO-e
05 0.6 0.7 08 0.9 1.0 describing the cyclic hardening behavior, drag stress,
Overstress ratio D, is a function of a hardening parameter, ql, and the
Fig. 5. Dependence of overstress on inelastic strain rate cyclic hardening function, B, is that of q2-
during holdtime. (The overstress ratio is defined as the over- The cyclic nonhardening region concept [8] was
stress during the holdtime divided by that at the beginning of applied to the hardening parameters of q] and q2,
the strain hold. Solid line values were calculated by eq. (13).) because the back stress was strongly dependent on the
330 K. Taguchi, 7". Uno / Determination of internal state variables
pk =/'~rkl~,°l, (10)
&~ = F k ( 1 - rk)~in, (11)
{ Fk=l;
Fk
gk=0
0; gk < 0
and
or
(Ogk/a~=in)i~in>O ,
(c3gk/OEin)~-in < 0 '
(12) cyclic stress-strain relation at a constant strain range.
Hence, the material constants for eqs. (6) through (12)
can be determined from the relationships given in figs.
where gk represents the cyclic nonhardening region, 4(a) and (b).
and a k and Pk denote the center and size of the The back stress term R l is assumed to become
region, respectively. B2, D~, L 1, L 2, m l, m 2, r], and r e constant rapidly when an inelastic strain develops. The
are material constants. strain hardening behavior of the stress-strain hystere-
The determination procedures for the material con- sis relation is simulated by giving R z the saturated
stants are described as follows. value of B. Hence, the material constants C l and C 2
The function F [ ~ r - o - b , D] was determined as eq. can be determined from the monotonic stress-strain
(13) from the relationship of overstress to the inelastic relation and the steady-state stress-strain hysteresis
strain rate, indicated in fig. 5. relation, respectively. An example of the back stress
behavior simulated by the proposed constitutive equa-
F[q--~b, D ] = A I ( I o - o " b I / D ) ~' tions is indicated in fig. 6.
+A2( I o"- O-b I / D ) n2 , (13) The material constants C 3 and h e for the thermal
recovery term can be determined from the results of
where the material constants A 1, A 2, n 1, and n 2 are creep tests, because the back stress becomes constant
shown in table 1. (d b = 0) in the steady creep region.
The hardening parameter, qk (k = 1, 2), is equal to Consequently, all material constants were deter-
the inelastic strain in the monotonic stress-strain rela- mined as listed in table 1 without any iterative alter-
tion, and is approximately equal to ( A E i . / ( 2 rk)) in the ation.
q3
-200
_J
-- O" -200 ..... " O-
O-t) O'D
--'--: RI
: Rz :R 2
-400 -4OO
-06 -04 -62 0 0.2 0~4 0.6 -o -d4-d2 o o12 o'4 06
xIO-Z xlO-z
Inelostic stroin Gin Inelastic strain Gin
Fig. 6. Back stress behavior simulated by proposed constitutive model: (a) for first cycle, (b) for half-life cycle.
K. Taguchi, T. Uno /Determination of internal state variables 331
5 Comparison of the model with the experimental 4001 600"C o-- E~q~erimem
results ~Et -OO07 a--- Slmul~o.
tH • 3 600S
The proposed constitutive equations were used to
simulate the uniaxial cyclic inelastic behavior.
(a)4oo
I ~ I cycle
/ n a'E~aa a a n 600°C /
n ..IHJ--• n--• / ~100 ........
n'7 / I "1 l
300 B/ 0 O'O 0--0-0-0 d)-
._. / 0
0
I
600
I
1200
l I I
11300 2400 3 0 0 0 3 6 0 0
200 Hold lime t,s
o ~ ~~ - Exper~ent
Fig. 8. Comparison between simulated and experimental stress
p_ ~oo _~ : o. 02 relaxation curves during holdtime at first and half-life cycles.
: 0,014
e.J
~[ 0 / ~ 0 : 0AEt
.01 I
k- --:Simulation • : 0,007
: O-005
12 3 4
I 10 10 I0 10
(a)4oo
600%
N f / 2 cycle
~t = IO'3s-~
6. Conclusions
200
g_
b" o
,/ An experimental approach to determine back stress
and a constitutive modeling has been discussed for
Type 316 stainless steel at 600°C.
Back stress and overstress were experimentally de-
o~ -200
J Ex erl termined by analyzing the unloading curve for the
I --- -- : Simulation stress-strain response of cyclic strain tests. It has been
-400 found that the cyclic strain hardening behavior was
-ds o d.s ×'°-J mainly caused by the hardening in the back stress.
Total strain E t A phenomenological unified constitutive model in
Fig. 7. Comparison between simulated and experimental re- which the back stress and drag stress are taken as the
sults of symmetric continuous cycle tests: (a) tensile peak internal state variables has been proposed. The mate-
stress-number of cycles relation, (b) stress-strain curves for rial constants were able to be determined without any
several strain ranges at half-life cycle, (c) stress-strain curves iterative alteration. The model has been proved capa-
for 0.01 strain range at first and half-life cycles. ble of simulating the cyclic inelastic behavior.
332 K. Taguchi, 72 Uno /Determination of internal state L,ariables