Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Document
University of
Notre Dame
FORWARD PLANNING DOCUMENT
TERM/WEEKS: YEAR LEVEL: 8 LEARNING AREA/TOPIC: Landscapes and
T2/W3 Landforms
AUSTRALIAN CURRICULUM HISTORY
General Capabilities:
Literacy Numeracy ICT Critical and creative Ethical Behaviour Personal and social Intercultural
thinking Competence Understanding
Cross-curriculum priorities:
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander histories and Asia and Australia’s engagement with Asia Sustainability
Cultures
-Diagnostic. Introduction.
3 (ACHGK048) -In groups, students will be Asking students to -Students are asked to open the website to Lesson 3. -Students require
describing able to identify 5 key explain the -Students should pick a partner and sit next to them. their devices.
some of the identifiers of landforms. difference between -Inform students that they will be working with this partner during today’s lesson, but for now they should find two other -Lesson website,
different landforms and pairs (groups of 6) to do the next activity. with links ready to
types of -As pairs, on their mind map, landscapes, shows Body be used.
landforms students will be able to student knowledge -Ask students to open their Oxford eBook to page 46, ask students to read the paragraph and discuss key points with -Video on landforms
within a group types of landforms of meaning of their group. ready for lesson.
landscape into the landscape they are landscapes. -once discussion has lulled, ask each group to give a key point they discussed from the paragraph. Write the key points on -Padlet Pages to be
commonly found in. -Formative. the board. Ensuring all students understand what is being discussed through further explanation. ready.
assessment. -Ask students if they listed anything they think could be a landform in their poster they made last lesson.
-Students, when prompted, Students should be -Ask students to return to their pairs and to open the mindmeister tab in the website.
will be able to give a real- monitored -Inform students that they are to create a mind map each and should do their own research, yet should ask their partner
world example of a landform throughout the any questions they have before asking the teacher.
that is commonly found in mind map making - Students’ mind maps should include landscapes types, then breaking them into the landforms that are commonly found -Informing
the landscape they have period, to ensure in those landscapes. Telling students, they should use pg. 47 to help create their mind map. students, they
been asked about. they are on the right -Tell students they should include pictures in their mind map of some different land forms, whilst also including different should be doing
track. examples of different landforms from Australia and around the world, indicating where they are in the world. some extra
-Summative. -Teacher to monitor students whilst they work on their mind maps. research.
Students mind maps -Once students have completed their mind map, students should be asked if they found any interesting examples of any
+ their answers at landforms. Asking them to tell the class.
the end of class will -Other students should be asked to add the example to their mind map.
show if students -Students to be asked to save their mind map and follow the links on the website to upload to padlet
know what real -Students to be asked to put their devices away and get ready to be dismissed. -get some
world features are Plenary. examples
represented by each -Ask students some questions about what type of landforms are found in each of the landscapes (Mountainous, Coastal,
landform as well as Riverine, Arid), asking students for real-world examples of these landforms, if they can think of any.
which landforms are -tell students that before next lesson they are to do some research and list some landforms that could be seen in an
part of landscapes. urban landscape.
-Dismiss students from the class.
Learning Theory Statement.
Throughout the planning of the lessons, the teaching strategies utilised have been
deliberately chosen to ensure that the students get the best out of the lesson. It is widely
regarded that students learn best in their own zone of proximal development, as asserted by
Vygotsky (1978). The zone of proximal development, represents the difference between what
a student can achieve on their own and what a student can achieve with guidance (Hassan,
2011). Hence, it is fundamentally important that students are given the opportunity to work in
their individual zone. This learning theory, is the reason why students, in each lesson, are
given the opportunity to work individually on a task, without major time pressure, but always
have the opportunity to ask for assistance. As a result of this, students of all abilities are able
to work at their own rate and produce work at their own level.
implemented. A theory that states that individuals attain knowledge and understanding by
discovering things on their own (Hassan, 2011). As such, the lessons are largely inquiry based
with students investigating and researching to discover what they are intended to learn.
Expanding on this, students share to the class and create pieces of work with their new
knowledge and understandings, enabling other students to learn different ways of thinking
from them. Cognitivist theory asserts that individual’s prior knowledge develops when new
information is presented (Marsh, 2010). This knowledge can come to students from a range
of sources, one being the content they are presented with by the teacher, while another, the
thoughts of their peers. Through this, students can be presented with a process of thinking
different to their own and from this incorporate it into their knowledge. Hence, students have
been given the opportunity to work in groups during the lessons, to allow them time to
The ICT chosen has been deliberately selected to ensure that students learning is enhanced
and students’ engagement in maximised. During the first lesson students are asked to enter
their groups information into a google document. Through the use of such a document,
students are able to only take the time to read their part of the eBook, but get the important
information from the other parts of the document. In a way creating a jigsaw lesson, where
students gain information from their peers regarding topics they themselves are not highly
knowledgeable about.
During the second and third lessons, learning is very students led and inquiry based.
Students are given the tools they require to complete the lesson, but are only guided towards
the end goal more passively than in a more teacher directed lesson. Through the second
lesson students are given sites to conduct their research from, essentially creating a webquest
(Killen, 2016), yet in the third lesson students are given the opportunity to discover through
their own research. It could be argued, as Killen (2016) does, that this could enable students
to be taken off task, but they are given a wider range of opportunities to learn about the
diversity of elements that make up their research topic. For me, this is extremely important
for the lesson as students should realise that the same type of landform can appear differently.
The use of Padlet enables this realisation for students. As the work of students is
uploaded to a forum where all students can see it, thus prompting students to become
inquisitive about others work, in turn creating questions. From this, students can enter a
meaningful group discussion, where they have the important element required to have a
successful discussion; prior knowledge and questions to ask (Killen, 2016). As a result,
students will learn from the research of one another and inherit knowledge they may
Hassan, O. A. B. (2011). Learning theories and assessment methodologies an engineering
educational perspective. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(4), 327339.
doi: 10.1080/03043797.2011.591486
Killen, R. (2016). Effective teaching strategies: Lessons from research and practice (7th ed.).
South Melbourne, Vic: Thomson Social Science Press.
Marsh, C. (2010). Becoming a Teacher: Knowledge, Skills and issues (5th ed.). Frenchs
Forest, NSW: Pearson Australia
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological
Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.