Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Todd Evans
Director, Economic Analysis and Forecasting
February 22, 2006
Several external factors also supported Canadian exports through the past year. Perhaps most
important is that stronger US and overseas demand has partially offset the negative impact of
the dollar’s appreciation. Secondly, higher commodity prices have boosted the bottom line for
exporters of resource-based goods. A third factor stems from increasing globalization in recent
years. Canadian companies now import a much larger share of the inputs used in their
production processes. The import content used to make Canadian exports now averages
around 35%, and in many manufacturing industries the ratio is 50% or more. A higher dollar
means Canadian exporters are importing these inputs at a lower cost, which helps to maintain
cost competitiveness.
Chart 2: EDC support for Canadian exports levels off after big gains in 2001-02
EDC international business volume as a per cent of Canadian exports
16
15 Total Exports
14 Excl. Energy
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Source: EDC Economics.
In 1997, EDC’s international business volume facilitated about 8% of Canada's total exports of
goods and services. By 2005, this share had reached 12%. However, recent years have seen
a leveling in the share of Canadian exports supported by EDC, following big gains in 2001 and
2002 (Chart 2). There are a couple of reasons to help explain this. First, the run-up in the
Canadian dollar from 2003 to 2005 reduced measured EDC business volumes (a pure
arithmetical impact resulting from the conversion of EDC’s USD-denominated business into
In 2005, EDC executed transactions on behalf of 6,828 Canadian companies, a drop of 1.9%
from 2004 but maintaining the large gains from prior years.1 The drop in customers served
during 2005 was among small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). EDC worked with 6,101
SMEs in 2005, a decline of 3.8% from the previous year. Smaller exporting companies are less
able to deal with the stronger Canadian dollar and this may have contributed to the drop in
EDC’s SME customers in 2005. Nevertheless, SMEs still constitute the bulk of Canadian
companies that use EDC’s services. Indeed, the total volume of SME transactions conducted
by EDC amounted to $15.5 billion in 2005, up 31% from 2004.
Continuing favourable credit and liquidity conditions pushed global foreign direct investment
(FDI) flows up by nearly 30% in 2005, to an estimated US$ 897.6 billion. Outbound FDI by
Canadian companies came in at $38 billion last year, which is down from the 2004 outflow but
still well above the historical average. FDI inflows to Canada amounted to almost $40 billion in
2005, well ahead of the $8.2 billion inflow recorded in 2004.
Reflecting the stronger global investment backdrop, EDC facilitated $2.3 billion in new Canadian
outward FDI last year – 23.8% more than in 2004.2 Including renewals of existing coverage,
EDC’s political risk insurance (PRI), project finance programs and other FDI support covered
$4.8 billion of Canadian overseas investment during 2005.
Moreover, the FDI into emerging markets supported by EDC will support future follow-on
exports from Canada to these countries. EDC facilitated $2.1 billion in new FDI to emerging
markets in 2005 compared with $1.5 billion in 2004. Total Canadian FDI flows to developing
countries are estimated at $11 billion in 2005, an increase of 10% over 2004.
1
The numbers presented here refer to EDC’s direct and indirect customers. Direct customers served in 2005
amounted to 5,890 while the indirect customer tally was 938.
2
New Canadian outbound FDI is defined as new PRI policies and investment-related project finance. PRI renewals
are not classified as new FDI since they cover investments made in the past.
International trade and investment transactions provide benefits to the Canadian exporter or
investor as well as the foreign recipient. EDC Economics has developed a methodology to
estimate these foreign country benefits. In 2005, the trade and investment facilitated by EDC
supported an estimated US$ 45 to 50 billion in foreign GDP spread across 171 countries.
Foreign benefits tend to exceed domestic benefits because the gains from trade for developing
markets are generally greater than for developed economies like Canada.
Generating increased export sales and helping companies build out global procurement and
distribution networks (through FDI facilitation) enables companies to invest more in R&D
activities in Canada, which confers long-term benefits to the economy. In 2005, the average
R&D intensity across EDC’s business experienced an increase of 6.3%4. This represents the
second up year since the 2001 tech wreck. The largest gains last year were seen in aerospace,
telecom equipment, electronics manufacturing and refined petroleum products. These sectors
still account for one-quarter of private-sector R&D in Canada, but in 2005 EDC increased its
business in several other sectors that also perform a fair amount of R&D, including software,
instrumentation, and the automotive industry.
Investment in foreign economies may not exceed the large outflows experienced in the past
couple of years, but FDI-out is likely to remain above the historical average in 2006. EDC’s
Trade Confidence survey supports this view of an easing in FDI outflows. The Fall 2005 TCI
report showed that 19% of the companies surveyed have or plan to have direct investment in
foreign countries – compared with 25% in the Spring 2005 survey. The decline in outward
investment plans was concentrated entirely among small and medium-sized companies.
Indeed, the Fall survey showed that 42% of large Canadian companies plan to increase their
presence abroad through the use of FDI, up slightly from 41% in the Spring. Canadian
companies will continue to invest in their global production networks as they seek to reduce
costs and remain competitive.
3
The rise in contribution to GDP during 2005 stems primarily from the increase in outbound FDI supported by EDC,
particularly to emerging markets. Outbound FDI has a disproportionate impact on GDP since each $1 of FDI to a
developing county is estimated to generate at least $2 in follow-on exports over time.
4
R&D intensity measures the amount spent on R&D relative to overall output in that industry.