Supreme Court of the Philippines http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/pio/news/2019/03/03-21-19.

php

SEARCH THIS SITE

SEARCH

HOME
ABOUT THE SC

Brief
COURT NEWS Overview
FLASH of the SC
PUBLIC INFORMATION
Court News Flash
SC Upholds Drug Conviction of Irish National
Annual Reports
Benchmark
March 21, 2019
Directory
The Supreme Judicial Excellence
Court has upheld theAwardees
conviction of 53-year old Irish national Eanna O’Cochlain who was caught in possession of two sticks of marijuana weighing less than a gram during a final security checkpoint at the Laoag City
FAQs
International onIlocos
Airport, the Norte
Courtin 2013. A search was made on O’Cochlain when airport authorities detected the smell of marijuana in the departure area.
Transparency and Accountability
In aDECISIONS
36-page decision penned by Justice Diosdado M. Peralta, the Court’s Third Division affirmed the February 9, 2016 Decision and the July 21, 2016 Resolution of the Court of Appeals (CA), which in turn affirmed the November 22,
2013 Decision of the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 13, Laoag City, finding accused-appellant O’Cochlain guilty of violation of Section 11, Article II of RA 9165 or the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002.
RESOLUTIONS
TheBARCourtADMISSIONS
held that failure to strictly comply with Section 21 (1) of R.A. No. 9165 does not necessarily render an accused person’s arrest illegal or the items seized or confiscated from him inadmissible or render void and invalid such
seizure. TheBAR
most2019
important factor is the preservation of the integrity and evidentiary value of the seized item.
Law List
The Court held in this case, there was substantial compliance with the chain of custody rule, noting that the prosecution was able to prove, through documentary and testimonial evidence, that the integrity and evidentiary value of the
SUPREME
seized items wereCOURT TOUR in every step of the way.
properly preserved
QUICKLINKS
Citing People v. Delof
Court Monte, the Court held that “[n]on-compliance with the requirements of the law is not automatically fatal to the prosecution’s case and the accused may still be held guilty of the offense charged.”
Appeals
Sandiganbayan
Likewise, the Court held that the chain of custody rule is a matter of evidence and a rule of procedure, it being ultimately anchored on the weight and admissibility of evidence which the courts have the exclusive prerogative to decide. Any
missing link,Court of Tax
gap, doubt, Appeals
challenge, break, problem, defect or deficiency in the chain of custody goes to the weight of the evidence, not in its admissibility, it said.
Office of the Court Administrator
To assess an allegedly faulty
Philippine chain Academy
Judicial of custody, the court looks for ample corroborative evidence as to the evidence’s acquisition and subsequent custody. The court need not rule out every possibility that the evidence underwent alteration;
it needs only to find that the reasonable probability is that the evidence has not been altered in any material aspect.
Judicial and Bar Council
E-Library
The Court also ruled that in this case, there was not a reasonable airport search but that O’Cochlain had waived his right against unreasonable searches when he gave his consent to the warrantless search.
Philippine Reports Online
The Court stressed
Action that an airport
Program forsearch is reasonable
Judicial Reform when limited in scope to the object of the Anti-Hijacking program, not the war on illegal drugs. Unlike a routine search where a prohibited drug was found by chance, a search on the
person of the passenger or on his personal belongings in a deliberate and conscious effort to discover an illegal drug is not authorized under the exception to the warrant and probable cause requirement.
CONTACT US
The Court, however, held that there was a valid consented warrantless search in the case of O’Cochlain who readily agreed when the security screening officer (SSO) requested to conduct a pat down search on him. It noted that the
record is devoid of any evidence that O’Cochlain manifested objection or hesitation on the body search.

Justice Marvic M.V.F. Leonen wrote a dissenting opinion.

(G.R. 229071, People v. O’Cochlain, December 10, 2018)

Copyright © 2013. Supreme Court of the Philippines.

1 of 1 3/22/19, 6:13 PM