Kennesaw State University

DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University

Dissertations, Theses and Capstone Projects

4-1-2009

Internship in Information Technology Service

Weiqiang Li

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/etd

Part of the Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons

Recommended Citation
Li, Weiqiang, "Internship in Information Technology Service" (2009). Dissertations, Theses and Capstone Projects. Paper 39.

This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in
Dissertations, Theses and Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University.
Internship in Information Technology Service

Weiqiang Li

An Internship Paper

Submitted in Partial Fulfillment

Of the Requirements for the

Master of Public Administration

Kennesaw State University

March 15, 2009
 Executive Summary

This spring semester I had the opportunity to do my internship in department of

Information Technology Service (ITS) in KSU. I interned in the Computer Lab which

is one division of ITS.

The purpose of my internship is to demonstrate the ability to apply what I have

learned from the classroom to an actual work experience. The analysis of the theory

taught in classroom and its application in practice also is showed in the internship

paper.

My internship paper was mainly composed of there parts: description of

internship, policy analysis in ITS, and recommendations. The first part was the

description of my internship in ITS. It included the organizational structure of ITS, the

mission and statement, what I did during the internship, and the analysis of Strength,

Weakness, Opportunity and Threats (SWOT) in Computer Lab. The second part was

important one. In this part, I focused on the analysis of policy making and explained

how the policies are being made in ITS. I took the Zimbra email system as a typical

example to analyze the policy making in this department. There were some

differences between the theory taught and the application in practice. The last part

included something special in the internship, the connections of public administration

theory, the comparison between Kennesaw State University and the college in China,

and some recommendations and suggestions.

At the end of the paper, there is a conclusion to sum up what I learned from the

internship.
 CONTENTS

Introduction 1

Description of the Internship 1

Policies Analysis in ITS 10

Findings and Suggestions 17

Conclusion 19

Reference 21
INTRODUCTION

My internship took place in department of Information Technology Service

(ITS) in KSU. ITS is responsible for providing information technology support for

students, faculty, and staff in Kennesaw State University. I worked in the Computer

Lab which is one important division of ITS, from January to May, 2009. The

Objective of my internship is to apply the Public Administration theory (PA) which I

learned from the class to the practice in public sector and compare their differences.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INTERNSHIP

ITS plays a very important role in KSU, which is composed of nine divisions

–Client-Server, Information Security, IT Inventory Management (ITIM), IT Labs,

Networking, Business Operations, Service Desk, Technology Outreach and

Telecommunications (Figure1).

Client-Server

Information Security

ITIM

IT Lab

ITS
Networking

Operation

Service-Desk

Technology Outreach

Telecommunications

Figure 1

1
 There are about 55 staff working in this department. The mission of ITS is to

provide information technology leadership and support that enables Kennesaw State

University to fulfill its instructional and administrative functions in an efficient,

effective, and timely fashion1. Each division has different function in ITS, which can

be showed as follow:

1. Client-Server

The Client-Server group is one of many divisions within the Information

Technology Services (ITS) department at KSU. The Client-Server group offers over

100 applications; administers over 70 different servers such as Windows, Linux,

UNIX, Netware, MacOS; supports student, staff and faculty email; and provides

identity management, web development, and an enterprise backup solutions.

This group also helps to make faculty, staff, and students’ everyday tasks easier

and more efficient such as researching, testing, and implementing new technologies

for future use.

2. Information Security

This is a special division in ITS department. The mission of the KSU

Information Security Office (ISO) is to assure the security of the University's

Information resources and provide a safe computing environment for the KSU

community.

This mission of ISO is achieved through the utilization of policy and procedures,

security training and awareness, and technical controls. This group also supports the

1
http://its.kennesaw.edu/its_mission.htm

2
university's teaching, learning, and public service missions through partnership with

faculty, staff, and students2.

3. IT Inventory Management (ITIM)

The ITIM Division is responsible for setup and installation, relocation, and

inventory management of PC desktop computers and peripheral devices such as

printers and scanners. This group supports staff, faculty, and computer lab machines

at KSU. For instance, if there is a request relocation of existing IT equipment, they

will quickly response and sent technology assistant to solve the problem. This is a

small division but it is the basic and key part of ITS department.

4. IT Lab

The Information Technology Labs is the most important and advantageous for

students and staff in KSU. The mission of this group is offering the computer

sources and net work service for the students and staff in KSU.

The services in IT Lab include: Computer Application source, Printing and

Copying, Faxing, Wireless Network Access, P-Drive Service, and other special

services such as machines for handicaps, scanning machines, and machines for group

use. Further more, if the students and staff have any problem with their laptops and

net working, they can supply the technologic help to solve the problems.

5. Networking

The Network Operations division is responsible for installing and maintaining

the network infrastructure in KSU. KSU has over 100 subnets supplied by over 600

2
http://www.kennesaw.edu/infosec/index.html

3
switches and two core routers that are connected with over five miles of fiber optic

cable. The switches provide access to numerous campus servers running on a variety

of platforms and Operating Systems such as Windows 2000, Windows 2003, Novell

Netware, HPUX, Solaris and Linux. This infrastructure also provides a link to the

Internet for over 20,000 users3.

Network Operations provides all the enterprise services to the campus. These

services include: Domain Name Services (DNS), Dynamic Host Control Protocol

(DHCP), Network Time Service, and Windows Internet Naming Service

(WINS).This division is also responsible for managing the Campus Firewall

protecting KSU’s network from outside attacks by viruses, Trojans, spammers and

hackers.

6. Operations

The Operations division serves is a central hub of all of the ITS divisions. It is

also responsible for the main phone line in KSU.

Each KSU owned laptop will now have a STOP tag, embossed KSU decal, and

a Bios Splash Screen and Screensaver (Windows Only) installed in an effort to deter

theft. Each time the computer boots up, the BIOS will display ‘Property of

Kennesaw State University4.

7. Service Desk

The Service Desk is the most important part of services in KSU. The Service

Desk offer many kinds of services to the faculty, staff and students by this service

3
http://its.kennesaw.edu/Networking/index.htm
4
http://its.kennesaw.edu/operations/index.htm

4
platform. The services divided into two parts: one is for faculty and staff and the

other one is for students (Figure 2).

faculty and staff students

NetID & KSUID
New Student – Getting Started

Email
Student Server

WebCT Vista
IT Training

Owl Express
File Storage

Track-It
Frequently Asked Questions

Viruses / Hoaxes / Spyware
Atlas Server

File Storage
Computing

New Hire Information
Wireless Network Access

Web Publishing
Software Downloads

Dreamweaver Update - Faculty/Staff

Kronos

IT Training

Network Requests

Technology Equipment Purchases

Moving Equipment

Wireless Network Access
Sources: http://its.kennesaw.edu/helpdesk/index.htm
Figure 2

8. Technology Outreach

The ITS Technology Outreach group is a cooperative team devoted to transferring technical

knowledge across the Kennesaw State University campus community. The mission of this group

is to facilitate the transfer of knowledge from the people who implement technology on campus

to the people who use the technology5.

5
http://its.kennesaw.edu/techoutreach/index.php

5
9. Telecommunications

Telecommunications is a division of Information Technology Services. This

group is responsible for all telephone connectivity at KSU, excepting the student

apartments. This connectivity includes all moves, adds, changes and repairs, as

requested by departmental personnel. Telecom is also responsible for the acquisition

of pagers, as well as obtaining proper approval for purchases of cell phones.

Telecommunications is also responsible for all of the voice and data cable

installed throughout campus. Telecom works closely with Plant Operations Facilities

- Planning and Design, to ensure that the proper wiring infrastructure is provided in

new and renovated buildings. Extensive time and effort has gone into cable

installations in an effort to bring KSU current for upcoming technology changes.

The Hierarchy Structure of ITS

CIO

ITS Director

Associate Project
Director (6) Manager (1)

Figure 3

Figure 3 shows the hierarchy structure of ITS department in KSU. The Chief

6
Information Officer (CIO) whose name is Mr. Randy Hind, in charge of Information

Technology Service and Library. The director of ITS is named Ms. Lectra Lawhorne.

She has 6 associate directors and one project manager. Each associate director or

manger is responsible for different divisions in ITS.

I interned in the Computer Lab which is one division of ITS. There are 6 staff

and 30 students working in computer labs. The work mission in this division is

offering the computer sources and net work service for the students, faculty and staff

in KSU. The services in computer lab include offering printing and faxing services in

the labs. My associate director, whose name is Ms. Christina Coronado, in charge of

the section of Service Desk, Labs, Technology Outreach, and Technology Support for

Individual Colleges (TSS).

As a lab assistant, my main work is to assist with the manager to administrate the

labs in KSU. I serve the people who use the labs, and try my best to help them.

Further more, if the students and staff have any problem with their laptops and net

working, I can supply the technological help to solve the problems. I also participated

in Zimbra program which is a new email system in KSU.

My manager is Mr. Rami Abdul-Hadi, whose daily job is to assists in the

administration of the KSU Help Desk and ITS Computer labs. As a staff in ITS, he

responds to phone calls and emails to the Help Desk as needed. As a manager, Mr.

Rami Abdul-Hadi assists with the implementation of new polices and procedures

within the Labs and Help Desk. And he assists with the budgeting and forecasting

needs of Labs and Help Desk. He also assists with the management with approx 30

7
student assistants and 6 full time staff. Some times he plays a role as liaison between

ITS and other lab coordinators. He develops and maintains documentation for internal

and external users. On some weekends, he has to work in evening or early morning

hours.

A SWOT analysis in Computer Lab

SWOT Analysis is a strategic planning method used to evaluate the Strengths,

Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats involved in a project or in a business venture.

It involves specifying the objective of the business venture or project and identifying

the internal and external factors that are favorable and unfavorable to achieving that

objective6. SWOT means Strength, Weakness, Opportunity and Threats. SWOT is a

tool to analyze the internal advantages and disadvantages of organizations. The

external opportunity and threats also be analyzed by this method.

Figure 4 shows the SWOT analysis in the computer lab. In the internal analysis

of computer lab, the strength include many aspects, such as good environment for

studying, the Lab team work hard and seriously, good leadership and administration,

etc. The weakness comprises lack of space for the Lab, printer sometimes not working,

Limitation of computer and printer sources. For the external part, the opportunities for

the computer lab are more students like coming to the Labs, good reputation, and

employment opportunities for students. Some students break the Lab rules,

Competition from other resource, and pressure comes from the public and the board

of directors.

6
Burkhart, Patrick L. and Reuss, Suzanne. "Successful Strategic Planning: A Guide for Nonprofit Agencies and
Organizations." Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1993.

8
 In order to improve the efficiency and effectiveness, the computer lab need to

decrease the weakness and the threats. For example, the computer lab can make a new

project plan for building some new labs to extend the space. It also needs to buy more

new computers and printers. On the other hand, the staff and lab assistants need to

INTERNAL

Strength: Weakness:

a. Good environment for studying a. Lack of space for the Lab

b. The Lab team work hard and seriously b. Printer sometimes not working

c. Good leadership and administration c. Limitation of computer and printer sources

d. Offering the computer sources, scanning,

faxing and net work service

e. Supporting good technology service for

special help.

NAGETIVE
POSITIVE

f. Lab also even open on weekend

Opportunities: Threats:

a. More students like coming to the Labs a. Some students break the Lab rules

b. Good reputation b. Competition from other resource

c. Employment opportunities for students c. Pressure comes from the public and the

board of directors.

EXTERNAL

Figure 4

9
improve their personal computer skills to help people. To improve the strength and

seize the opportunity also can make the computer lab more efficient and effective on

their services.

POLICIES ANALYSIS IN ITS

During my internship, I found that policy making was very important and could

be seen in any section in ITS. Compare to the Policy Analysis theory, the policy

making in ITS seemed quite different but still successes. The definition of one policy

in ITS is a principle, a plan, or a course of action which is adopted and pursued by

the ITS department.

As we learned from Public Analysis theory, the process of a policy making

includes these steps: problem definition, stakeholders, assembling evidences,

alternatives construction, outcomes projection, criteria selection and trade-off, and

making a decision7. The procedure of policy making in ITS almost follow these steps

(Figure 5) but sometimes for some policy they do not need to follow all the steps.

Figure 5

7
Eugene Bardach. A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to More Effective Problem-Solving,
2004. 2nd edition.

10
 Ms. Christina Coronado, the assistant director who is in charge of the Service

Desk, Labs, Technology Outreach and TSS said: “Sometimes we just want the policy

can be implemented in time, we don’t pay more attention on some steps of policy

making”. Ms. Christina Coronado also has power to make a policy and let her staff

to implement it. Before making this policy, she might listen to her staff’s advice or

take other universities as reference. For some important policy, she might hold a

meeting with the managers and discussed the problem. They might need to collect

and assemble some data and make some options. Then they compared these options

and made a decision to choose the best one for them. Some of the steps can be

applied to them.

We can take the new mail system for example to verify how the policy being

made in ITS. In order to learn more about difference between policy making in ITS

and theory, we use these steps to analyze:

Step 1: Background. Before using the new email system--Zimbra, there were

three email systems in KSU, which are Student Email, Atlas Email and Groupwise

email. The first two email systems provide the email service for students in KSU.

Groupwise email system only serves the faculty and staff in KSU.

Groupwise email is an essential mode of communication for all staff in KSU

Professional Teacher Education Unit. As a KSU faculty, he/she activates and

accesses his/her Groupwise email frequently. Critical information will be

communicated using Groupwise email rather than private email accounts in KSU.

The professors or other staff must use Groupwise email as the official

11
communication with student. The Groupwise email system is 10 years old.

Step 2: Problem Definition. In recent years, with the university development

and changes, the number of students has been increasing. The organization structure

of KSU Professional Teacher Education is stronger than before. It illustrates the fact

that there is more and more faculty and staff working in KSU. It illuminate that the

numbers of user also increase rapidly.

Now the Groupwise email system has more problems and it can’t meet more

and more users’ needs. A general consensus of users pointed to the emerging

limitations of the existing email service. It can’t offer larger storage space for the

users. For instance, as inboxes growing each semester, many users have to spend

valuable time filing and retrieving messages. Additionally, they have to delete email

messages frantically to stay under the set fifty megabyte limit. Consequently, a new

email service with key end-user benefits was selected to replace Groupwise.

On the basis of the above, the problem can be defined as -- the limitations of

old email system affected the efficiency of KSU’s faculty and staff.

Step 3: Stakeholders. As can be seen from Figure 6, the stakeholders in this

case are listed mainly as follows: faculty and staff, students, ITS Department, KSU

Board, Public, and the Company of Groupwise. As the faculty and staff are the users

of this email system and the students have strong relationship with these users.

Consequently the faculty and staff, students are the most important stakeholders in

this case.

12
 The Company of
Groupwise

Faculty & Staff ITS Department

Stakeholders

Students KSU Board

Public

Figure 6

Step 4: Assemble Evidences. According to the current situation, the data were

collected in three perspectives: (1) Faculty and staff’s information in KSU; (2)

Students’ information; and (3) Data of current email system in ITS. The more detail

of these evidences can be showed as follow:

Firstly, the faculty and staff’s information is most important because they are

the End-User for Groupwise email system. The information collected include: the

satisfaction survey for old email service; the defect of the old email system; the

numbers of Groupwise users;

Secondly, we must attach importance to the student information. The purpose of

using Groupwise email system is to build a communicational bridge between the

professors and students. The students’ opinions play an important role. These

evidences which reflect the problem of Groupwise email system indirectly include:

the satisfaction survey of the communication with their professors; the numbers of

13
student email users.

At last, ITS department has more authoritative and persuasive data in

Groupwise email system. These data include: the data of messages of Groupwise in

recent 10 years; the storage space of Groupwise; the error report of Groupwise; the

information about the complaint from the end-users; the pressure from the university

control board and public.

Step 5: Alternatives Construction. After analyzed the data collected, we can

construct two alternatives:

(1) Use a new email system (Zimbra) instead of the old system;

(2) Keep and improve the old mail system (Groupwise).

Step 6: Outcomes Projection. According to policy analysis theory, the

following factors were taken into consideration, when they forecasted the outcomes

of the options:

(1) Forecasted the quantitative data of the email system condition for 10 years

periods;

(2) Forecasted the outcomes of the underlying factors affected such as the

option was not implemented;

(3) Forecasted each option as a policy was implemented, what was the outcome

of the email system condition. Figure 7 shows the outcomes of each option we just

forecasted:

14
 Option
Option(1): Use a new email system Option(2): Keep and improve the
(Zimbra) instead of the old system old mail system (Groupwise)
Strongpoint
&Shortcoming
a. More efficient and effective a. Easy to use for staff
b. A much larger storage space b. Decline the budget on users’
c. Powerful search tools that can training
quickly scan a user's email and pull c. more convenient for
up relevant content maintaining
d. Support for mobile smart
devices such as iPhone, Blackberry
and Palm
e. A rich interactive
Strongpoint
f. Ability to 'drag and drop'
messages into new folders or the
trash
g. Group scheduling which
recognizes and acts on certain text
in messages.
h. It has been implemented
successfully by over 500
universities in the nation
a. It takes time and cost on new a. Not enough storage space
users training b. It takes time on filing and
b. May not easy for users at first retrieving messages
time c. Limitation at interaction
c. Need to test the stability before d. Didn’t support for mobile smart
Shortcoming using it. devices
e. It is difficult to update and
improve the 10 years old email
system
f. It affect the communication
between the staff and students
Figure 7

Step 7: Criteria Selection and Trade-off. We can use efficiency, effectiveness,

budget, feasibility and acceptability as the criteria to evaluate these two options. The

starts (Figure 8) was used to score those tow options. Five starts represent the

highest score (5 points) and 1 start only gets 1 point.

15
 Figure 8

As can be seen from Figure 8, the new email system is more efficiency,

effectiveness and acceptability than the old email system. But it takes a lot of money

to buy the new email system. The old email system saves money because they just

spends little budget on the maintenance and update. These two options almost get the

same score on feasibility. It means that all of them can be easily to be implemented.

Step 8: Making a Decision. Basing on the consequences and trade offs (Figure

8), the option (1) has the high score of 21 points while the option (2) only gets 15

points. It means that the option (1) should be the better choice for ITS. After

finishing all of the eight steps, we can make a decision to choose the option (1) as

the new policy to implement.

FINDINGS AND SUGGESTIONS

As a public department, ITS has made a great success on Public Administration

(PA). The connection of PA theory can be showed as follow:

At first, the Organization theory applied in ITS. This department has a good

16
longitudinal hierarchy structure8. From CIO to the staff who is the bottom, every one

in this department has a clear-cut assignment of responsibility.

Secondly, the process of policy making in ITS is almost the same with Policy

Analysis theory while still has some differences. For the case mentioned above, the

policy of using Zimbra email system for KSU staff main include the eight steps of

Policy Making theory. Ms. Christina Coronado, who is the associate director, held a

meeting for discussing the new policy making. They might not pay more attention on

the steps of policy making such as problem definition, stakeholders. It would take

time on following all steps in policy making theory. Actually they just focused on old

email system problem and gave some solutions. They also looked into what has been

successful for other learning institutes. Zimbra has been implemented successfully

by over 500 universities in the nation. Considering the possibility, efficiency and

effectiveness, Ms. Christina Coronado agreed to use Zimbra email system and

submitted this decision to Ms. Lectra Lawhorne, who is the director of ITS. When

the approval came from Ms. Lectra Lawhorne, it was proposed to Mr. Randy Hinds,

the Vice President of Operation for final approval. After finishing this process above,

the new policy would be implemented.

At last, Women Leadership is obviously seen in this department. As we learned

from Leadership & Ethics in Public Service, there is an “Evidence of Glass Ceiling”

in women leadership9. It means that it is difficult for women ascend into elite

leadership position. But the fact in this department proved that Ms. Christina

8 th
Shafritz, Ott, and Jang. Classics of Organizational Theory, 6 Ed, 2005.05.
9
Northouse, Peter G. Leadership: Theory and Practice. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2007.

17
Coronado and other women leaders has broken the “Glass Ceiling” and are

achieving success.

I have been working in I work in the Computer and Internet Service Center

(CISC) of Lushan College since 2006. This is a new college which was founded in

2004. The department which I work in has the same mission as ITS in Kennesaw

State University. As different infrastructure construction and different cultural

background, we can learn something from the comparison between KSU and LC.

(1). The variety and universality of Information Technology services:

In KSU, all kinds of IT services can be accessed from anywhere at any time. All

the faculty or staff and students can enjoy the services in KSU, such as Web CT,

email service. But in LC, the IT service is poor because of its limitation on

equipments and technology. As a new college in China, LC still needs to improve

their effectiveness of their services.

(2). The communication between professors and students:

There are many ways for professors communicating with the students after the

class in KSU, such as using email system, WebCT service. With the Zimbra email

system, the student can easily make an appointment with their professors. In LC, the

email system seldom be used to be the communication tool for the professors and

students. They may prefer using QQ which is the software for people to

communicate each other by internet. They didn’t consider the email in campus as the

official tool to communicate with each other. Some times the professors miss the

student’s appointment. It is inefficiency.

18
 (3). The organization structure:

In KSU, the ITS department has a good longitudinal hierarchy structure. Every

one in this department has a clear-cut assignment of responsibility. They can make

work more effective and efficient. Comparing to KSU, LC needs to improve the

organization structure and hire more professional technology people in ITS

department.

(4). The policy making:

The policy making process are almost the same between KSU and LC. The

director has more power and right in making a policy decision. It seems that the

director in LC has more power and authority than in KSU in making a policy

decision.

At the same time of learning from internship in ITS, I also have some personal

views and recommendations:

(1) Simplify the process of policy making. It depends on the different situation,

we may overstep some steps of policy making to make more efficient and effective

in administration.

(2) Improve the efficiency on administrating the computers in the Labs. I

suggest that the Lab using software for the unity of computers management. The

staff or student assistant can easily open, shutdown, and monitor all computers in the

Lab.

CONCLUSION

I experienced a signification internship in ITS and I benefited a lot from the

19
internship. And I just focus on two parts in my internship. One is internship work

description while the other one is policy making analysis in ITS department. All of

them have consanguineous connection of PA theory. What I learned can apply to

practice when I come back to China.

To sum up, to do internship in public department like ITS is very helpful. It can

make the MPA students getting deeper understanding the knowledge they learned

from the textbook. The fact indicated that MPA program is a successful project in

KSU.

20
Reference:
1
http://its.kennesaw.edu/its_mission.htm
2
http://www.kennesaw.edu/infosec/index.html
3
http://its.kennesaw.edu/Networking/index.htm
4
http://its.kennesaw.edu/operations/index.htm
5
http://its.kennesaw.edu/techoutreach/index.php
6
Burkhart, Patrick L. and Reuss, Suzanne. "Successful Strategic Planning: A
Guide for Nonprofit Agencies and Organizations." Newbury Park: Sage Publications,
1993.
7
Eugene Bardach. A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold Path to
More Effective Problem-Solving, 2004. 2nd edition.
8
Shafritz, Ott, and Jang. Classics of Organizational Theory, 6th Ed, 2005.05.
9
Northouse, Peter G. Leadership: Theory and Practice. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage, 2007.

21