0 views

Uploaded by Karthick Selvam

Scientific publication

- Benard 4655 RSm
- B.E Aeronautical Engg.
- Blasting and Drill Open Pit
- AJVG-Aeronet-2011.ppt
- Explosives Design
- Colagrossi Etal Nutts98
- Causes of Water Hammer
- Research Paper on Shock Wave2
- Ac 020033
- Two Phase Flow and Heat Transfer - - Unit 1 - How to Access the Portal
- Rmph 2016 Theory1 with solution
- theoryofboltzman00grad
- African Shock Absorber
- Computaional FLuid dynamics.pdf
- IJCER (www.ijceronline.com) International Journal of computational Engineering research
- Computational Flow Modeling for Chemical Reactor Engineering
- FDSdispersion
- Aero 3rd Sem Syll
- Thermal-Fluids Lab Report - Group 3
- 1 - 26

You are on page 1of 3

8108

2014, DESIDOC

Sankarsan Padhy*, and Susmita Panigrahi

Proof and Experimental Establishment, DRDO, Chandipur-756 025, India

*

E-mail: spadhy55@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

This paper deals with development of velocity measurement methodology based on projectile shock wave

pressure measurements. The measurement principle is based on the fact that, whenever a projectile moves with

supersonic velocity, shock wave fronts are produced along the trajectory of the projectile. Measurement configuration

has been developed for measuring the shock wave pressure associated with projectile in flight, and hence, projectile

velocity has been calculated. This paper covers various aspects of shock waves, generation of N Waves, feasibility

study for capturing shock wave using dynamic microphone. Finally, suitable piezo-electric sensor has been selected

and deployed in the trials and shock wave signature has been captured. From shock wave pressure, the projectile

velocity has been computed.

Keywords: Shock wave, piezo-electric sensors, velocity measurement

Shock waves are generally mechanical waves of Downstream Flows

finite amplitude and arise when matter is subjected to rapid For an adiabatic shock, the three requirements of mass,

compression. In an ideal fluid, large perturbations to fluid momentum, and energy conservation, collectively known as

dynamical variables inevitably evolve to form a divergently Rankine-Hugoniot relations, enable to create the downstream

large velocity gradient–a shock wave front. When the gradients flows and their thermodynamic variables to their upstream

become large, the viscous stress can no longer be ignored. In counterparts. Taking the reference frame in which the shock

case of shock wave front, viscous stress converts the kinetic front is at rest and assuming that upstream flow is normally

energy into thermal energy. Shock wave estimation and incident upon shock front, Rankine-Hugoniot relations take the

detection details are presented by Sadler1, et al. Propagation form

details of shock waves through atmosphere are covered in ρ2υ2 = ρ1υ1 = j (1)

Henry2, et al. Modelling of shock wave force is presented p2 + ρ2υ2² = p1 + ρ1υ1² (2)

by Acharya & Naik3. Applications of piezo-electric sensors h2 + ½υ2² = h1+ ½υ1² (3)

as hydrophone are presented by Kharat4, et al. Supersonic where j is the mass flux, which is determined by upstream

projectile identification using acoustic signature are given in flow. ρ, υ, p represent density, velocity, and pressure of the

Loucks5, et al. flow and subscripts 1, 2 are used to denote quantities measured

This paper presents details of shock wave characteristics, ahead and behind the shock, respectively. Taking the case

generation of N waves, and feasibility of capturing shock wave of projectile moving with supersonic speed, conservation of

phenomena using dynamic microphones and its limitation, mass, momentum, and energy should be considered. In case

selection of suitable sensor for capturing shock wave, of projectile, time to pass through the shock is so short that the

deployment of sensor in dynamic firing conditions and analysis flow can be regarded as stationary. In a stationary flow, mass

of measured results. flux is always constant as there is no new way to create new

mass. In case of energy, there are three ways that a change

2. Shock wave CHARACTERISTICS in energy flux could occur. First, the energy may be added to

Compared to acoustic waves, a shock waves is characterised the flow by chemical or nuclear reaction that occurs in shock

by some of its unusual properties like pressure-dependent front. Secondly, if gas is heated to high temperature, it will lose

supersonic velocity of propagation, formation of a steep wave energy. Thirdly, energy may be conducted by super thermal

front with abrupt changes in all thermodynamic quantities, for particles so as to preheat the incoming gas. In case of shock

non-planer shock waves, a strong reduction of propagation waves due to projectile, these three things don’t occur, and

velocity with increasing distance from the centre of the origin hence, energy flux is constant. Hence in case of a projectile,

and non-linear reflection and interaction properties. the momentum part is important and should be considered.

Received 22 August 2014, online published 13 November 2014

499

Def. SCI. J., Vol. 64, No. 6, november 2014

Due to supersonic flow, air particles get compressed, 3. FEASIBILITY STUDY WITH DYNAMIC

hence MICROPHONE

ρ2 >>ρ1, and υ2<<υ1 (4) Initially feasibility experiment was conducted to sense

as from Eqn. (1), product of ρ υ is constant. Equation (2) can shock wave pressure signature using standard dynamic

be written as microphone. Other instruments used were Hand-held Digital

p1+ (ρ1 υ1). υ1= p2+ (ρ2 υ2). υ2 (5) Storage Oscilloscope (Make Fluke), low-noise cables. The

From Eqns (4) and (5), it is clear that p2>>p1 and in our microphone was placed directly under the trajectory and the

measurement setup, this change in pressure is sensed. output was recorded in the oscilloscope using cables. Sensitivity

of the microphone used was 2 mv/Pa.

2.2 Formation of Mach Cone Due to Supersonic Figure 2 shows shock wave signature pattern of diameter

Projectile 30 mm and length 127 mm projectile. The pattern shows

The shock waves formed by a supersonically moving the actual shape but the recorded value is different from that

body are complex close to the body and depend on its detailed expected. This would be due to the saturation of the standard

shape, Reynold’s number, etc. However far from the body, the microphone. From this feasibility experiment, it was concluded

leading shock has the form of Mach cone, as shown in Fig. 1. that the shock wave signature exists whenever a projectile

moves at supersonic speed. Then the next goal was to identify

a suitable shock wave pressure sensor and capture and measure

the shock wave pressure.

Input A

projectile.

20 ms/div

In the above figure, the cone angle is α = sin–1 (1/ M),

where M = υp/a is the Mach no. of the projectile. υp is the Figure 2. Shockwave signature captured using dynamic

projectile velocity, and a is the speed of sound in the medium. microphone.

The shock is the boundary between that fluid which is sound- 4. MEASUREMENT RESULTS WITH SHOCK

based casual contact with the projectile and that which is not. WAVE PRESSURE SENSOR

This boundary is mapped out by (conceptual) sound waves that The measurement was carried out for a projectile of

propagate into the fluid from the projectile at the ambient sound length 396 mm and dia. 28 mm. The shock wave sensor is a

speed a. When the projectile is at the indicated position, the piezo-electric sensor and its details are given below: dynamic

envelop of these circles is the shock front and it has the shape range 0.001 psi to 8.3 psi, sensitivity 300 mv/psi, resolution

of Mach cone. Usually there will be two such shock cones, 0.0001 psi, resonant frequency 60 KHz, rise time 9 µs. The

one will be attached to the projectile bow shock and the other measurement layout and results are given in Figs 3 and 4,

will be formed out of the complex shock structure in its tail respectively.

region. The pressure must jump twice, one across each of these The sensor is placed about 1.05 m below the trajectory

shocks and will therefore form an N wave which propagates as shown6 in Fig 3. The output of the sensor is connected to

away from the projectile.

Let ∆p denote the pressure jump at the start of the N wave

and pat denote the ambient atmospheric pressure, we have from

Sadler1, et al.

∆p/pat= (0.53 d)(M2-1)1/8/(x3/4 l ¼) (6)

where d = Diameter of the Projectile

l = Length of the Projectile

x = Perpendicular distance from the projectile

trajectory to the sensor

M = Mach number

Figure 3. Shockwave measurement layout.

500

Padhy & Panigrahi: Development of a Method for Measuring Projectile Velocity using Shock Wave Pressure Sensors

the data acquisition system using special low-noise cable. inexpensive methods for measuring velocity at any given

Using values of length, diameter of the projectile, and distance point along the trajectory. Using an array of sensors, portions

between trajectory and sensor in Eqn. (6), velocity of the of trajectory can also be computed with suitable measurement

projectile is obtained as shown in Fig. 5. methodology.

In Fig. 4, as expected the N wave has been obtained and

two peaks are also observed. Behind the first shock, the density ACKNOWLEDGMENT

and pressure drop off gradually by more than the first shock’s Authors would like to thank Shri A Bose, Sc ‘F’, Additional

compression. As a result, the fluid flowing into the second Director and Shri R Appavuraj, Director PXE, Chandipur, for

shock has a lower pressure. their guidance and encouragement. Technical and financial

From Fig. 4, the value of shock wave pressure was 1.59 support from DRDO is highly acknowledged.

psi and from Fig. 5, the Mach number was 4.53. Speed of

sound was 349.8 m/s for ambient temperature of 30 oC, hence REFERENCES

the projectile velocity corresponding to that of shock wave 1. Sadler, Brain M.; Pham, Tien & Sadler, Laurel C.

pressure was 1584.59 m/s which is in the expected range. Optical and wavelet-based shock wave detection and

estimation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1998, 104(2), 955-963.

doi: 10.1121/1.423312

2. Henry, E. Bass; Bruce, A.; Lee, Layton; Bolen,

N. & Raspet, Richard. Propagation of medium

strength shock waves through the atmosphere.

J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1987, 82(1), 306-310.

doi: 10.1121/1.395567

3. Acharya, R.S. & Naik, S.D. Modelling of shock wave

force and its effect during sabot discard process. Def. Sci.

J., 2007, 57(5), 677- 690.

4. Kharat, D.K.; Mitra, Sandhya; Akhtar; Sania & Kumar;

Vijai. Polymeric piezo-electric transducers for hydrophone

applications. Def. Sci. J., 2007, 57(1), 7-22.

5. Loucks, Richard B.; Davis, Bradford S.; Moss, Linda;

Pham, Tien & Fong, Manfai. A method of identifying

Figure 4. Measured results. supersonic projectiles using acoustic signatures. ARL-

TR-859, September 1995.

pressure Vs Mach number

6. Moss, G. M.; Leeming, D. W. & Farrar, C.L. Military

ballistics a basic manual. Vol.1, Brassey’s New Battlefield,

Weapon and Technology Series into 21st Century.

Contributors

pressure (psi)

scientist in DRDO, PXE, Chandipur. He

completed his MTech in Radio Frequency

Design Technology from Indian Institute

of Technology (IIT) Delhi. He is a life

member of IETE and Society of EMC

engineers. His area of interest includes

radar cross section (RCS) prediction and

measurement of different targets, RCS

Mach number reduction by applying radar absorbing materials, ballistic

instrumentation and radar signal processing. He has received

Figure 5. Shock wave pressure versus Mach number plot.

silicon and titanium medals from DRDO in 2004 and 2010,

respectively. He was awarded Laboratory Scientist of the Year

5. CONCLUSION Award in 2012.

In this paper, a velocity measurement methodology based

Ms Susmita Panigrahi obtained her

on projectile shock wave pressure measurements has been diploma in Electronics & Telecommunication

developed. Measurement configuration has been developed Engineering from Women’s Polytechnic,

for measuring/observing the shock wave pressure associated Bhubaneswar in 1992. She joined PXE,

with projectile in flight, and hence, projectile velocity has been Chandipur in 1994. She has more than 20

calculated. Using suitable piezo-electric sensor, shock wave years of experience in the field of Doppler

signature has been captured, and from shock wave pressure, radars, acoustics and piezo-electric based

the projectile velocity has been computed. This is one of the instrumentation setups.

501

- Benard 4655 RSmUploaded bysubha_aero
- B.E Aeronautical Engg.Uploaded bynivas159
- Blasting and Drill Open PitUploaded bytracdiadk52
- AJVG-Aeronet-2011.pptUploaded byBheemesh Gudelli
- Explosives DesignUploaded bysukhoi200900
- Colagrossi Etal Nutts98Uploaded bydhana_benz
- Causes of Water HammerUploaded byaqhammam
- Research Paper on Shock Wave2Uploaded byJatinder Bhatia
- Ac 020033Uploaded byncharala
- Two Phase Flow and Heat Transfer - - Unit 1 - How to Access the PortalUploaded byamitkray
- Rmph 2016 Theory1 with solutionUploaded byDzzzz
- theoryofboltzman00gradUploaded bySílvio De Castro Silveira
- African Shock AbsorberUploaded byMaulana Rizal
- Computaional FLuid dynamics.pdfUploaded bySUDHANSHU SHEKHAR
- IJCER (www.ijceronline.com) International Journal of computational Engineering researchUploaded byInternational Journal of computational Engineering research (IJCER)
- Computational Flow Modeling for Chemical Reactor EngineeringUploaded byapi-3723333
- FDSdispersionUploaded byBidyut De
- Aero 3rd Sem SyllUploaded byNikhil Agrawal
- Thermal-Fluids Lab Report - Group 3Uploaded byKelvin Xu
- 1 - 26Uploaded byParama Guru
- 57327b4f951d3e1e5c1050d2f29595567966.pdfUploaded byNaveen
- Physical Equations Darcy's LawUploaded bySuta Vijaya
- Applied Scientific Research_ Section B Volume 10 issue 2 1962 [doi 10.1007_bf02928065] M. L. Mittal -- Unsteady hydrodynamic viscous flow in an annular channel.pdfUploaded bySrinivas Jangili
- Es 1010016Uploaded bylubangjarum
- MOF LP.docUploaded bySenthil Kumar
- Boundary conditions in the method of the finite elements.docxUploaded byCesarMauricioCorrea
- An Approximate Solution of the two dimensional Unsteady Flow due to Normally Expanding or Contracting Parallel PlatesUploaded byIJSTE
- Airlift CJCEUploaded bykiol66
- ehrgedrUploaded bypijetad
- J.fluids.engineering.2009.Vol.131.N4Uploaded byНильва Александр

- how to read a paperUploaded bynqdinh
- Useless ticketUploaded byKarthick Selvam
- yusuf-khan-the-rebel-commandent.pdfUploaded byKarthick Selvam
- sundarakandam.pdfUploaded byKarthick Selvam
- Tamil Stories - Mariyadai Raman KathaikalUploaded bySakthivel
- FORM 10c - Pension WithdrawalUploaded byKarthick Selvam
- Turbulent Flows - S.B. Pope (2000)Uploaded byKarthick Selvam
- Anatomy WinnerUploaded byKarthick Selvam
- Agilent Vee LXI 34972-90010Uploaded byKarthick Selvam

- CVC Manual Rev.0Uploaded byKaith Gallego
- DULEVO PL 01.4Uploaded byRahul Chatrath
- Waterborne TechnologyUploaded bypakde jongko
- Disclosure No. 1969 2017 Definitive Information Statement for Annual Stockholders Meeting on August 30 2017 Record Date on July 12 2017Uploaded byAngelica Lana
- NSS & NPSHRUploaded bymariasofiarossi
- 3 PhaseUploaded bymessallam
- Types of CarburetorsUploaded bySyed Imtinan Ahmed
- ME20Uploaded bybnbbharadwaj
- Bio Directed Reading QuestionsUploaded bykcqyw
- GP800R_F0W-28107-1A-11Uploaded bytelematico69
- Ned Solar PortfolioUploaded byanantbshinde
- Underground Electrification SystemUploaded byhashmisahib48
- SuperCritical Boilers in ChinaUploaded byTushar Chatterjee
- Barricade Tape 09Uploaded byokbangaet
- API 682 3rd for TrainingUploaded byJai-Hong Chung
- NFPA 13 2010 Bo Tri Dau SprinklerUploaded byAnonymous FTtQlMn
- Singh, Jagdamba_ Yadav, L. D. S.-Undergraduate organic chemistry. 1-Pragati Prakashan (2010).pdfUploaded byShilpendu Ghosh
- capacitor lectureUploaded byJimmy Teng
- World Foot PrintUploaded byRahul Bhansali
- YFA1 2002 3FA-AE1Uploaded byloretoh
- HICO Power Transformer CatalogUploaded bykobeyo
- Heating & Hot Water 2008.pdfUploaded bytexas_pete
- RMU RN2CUploaded bygosalhs9395
- Casing Drilling ProiectUploaded byLucica
- DiodesUploaded bypriyosantosa
- homogeneous catalysis.pdfUploaded byevsgoud_goud
- DSI_CAST_STL_413(1)Uploaded bymax_power
- Methods in Environmental Analysis III_ElectrogravimetryUploaded byseysea
- TestUploaded bypkrsuresh2013
- Weibel Instability Due to Ultra Intense Laser Plasma Interaction Relevant to FusionUploaded byIJBSS,ISSN:2319-2968