Cluster Acceptance Certificate (CAC) Lte Project

LTE NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 1 (52)
Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

Rendhita/ Jhon P Sea Hawk 2018 2018_P5_EJ_4G_140
Approved Checked Date Rev Reference
Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
CLUSTER ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE

(CAC)
LTE PROJECT
Area East Java
City Bangkalan
Cluster Name 2018_P4_EJ_4G_222

Abstract
This document is to provide report for XL Axiata on Cluster Acceptance Cluster based for commercial LTE
launch. Approval or reject using . logic SOM { SOM and HS , if SOM OK -> END ]
PT. HUAWEI SOM

TECH INVESTMENT PT. XL AXIATA Tbk.
${Level2}
Name: Achmad Fausi Name:
Date: 05 December 2018 Date:


Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION 5
1.1 Introduction 5
1.2 General Site Information 5
1.2.1 New Site Database 5
1.2.2 Neighbors First Tier 6
1.2.3 Punch List Database 6
1.3 Drive Test Methodology “Stationary Assessment” 7
1.4 FTP Server Information 7
1.5 Drive Test tool and Detail 7
2 MAP INFORMATION 8
2.1 Map Information 8
2.2 Drive test route, cluster border and coverage prediction 8
3 Performance Result 10
3.1 NMS KPI LTE
Error! Bookmark not defined.
3.1.1 Availability
3.1.2 Accessibility
3.1.3 Retainability
3.1.4 Integrity
3.1.5 TX_RANK (Info Only) 10
3.1.6 Mobility 12
3.1.7 Utilization 12
3.1.8 CSFB 12
3.1.9 Traffic and Capacity 12
3.2 Drive Test KPI 17
3.2.1 Retainability 17
3.2.2 Accessibility 17
3.2.3 CSFB 17
3.2.4 Integrity
3.2.5 Mobility 18

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.2.6 RSRP IDLE Drive Test 19

3.2.7 SINR-DL Dedicated Drive Test 20
3.2.8 PCI Plot 22
3.2.9 CQI 22
3.2.10 RSRQ 23
3.2.11 PS DL Throughput 24
3.2.12 PS UL Throughput 25
3.2.13 Transmission Modes Plot 26
3.2.14 Channel Bandwidth Plot 27
3.2.15 Event Failed 27
3.2.16 Sleeping Cell Identification 27
3.2.17 External Interference Identification 28
3.2.18 Cell Overshooting 28
3.2.19 Bad Spot analysis and Improvement 29
3.2.20 Physical Tuning Summary 30
3.2.21 Parameter Tuning Summary 33
4 NMS KPI RAN LTE TREND 34
5 KPI 2G & 3G 38
5.1 List of 2G, 3G & LTE sites inside LTE Polygon 38
5.2 NMS 2G 39
5.3 NMS 3G 39
5.4 MRR 3G 39
6 FEATURE 42
7 Issues, Recommendation and Exclusion 45
7.1 KPI RAN LTE
7.2 DT KPI LTE
7.2.1 Ping Latency 32bit 45
7.2.2 Ping latency 1000bit 46
7.3 KPI 2G & 3G 46
8 Conclusion 46

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
Table of Figure
Figure 1: Cluster Map Information ......................................................................................................................... 8
Figure 2: Drive Test Route ....................................................................................................................................... 8
Figure 3: Coverage Prediction using Planning Tools & DT Route ............................................................................ 9
Figure 6: RSRP IDLE Drive Test Result ................................................................................................................... 19
Figure 7: RSRP CDF Distribution ............................................................................................................................ 20
Figure 8: SINR-DL Dedicated Drive Test Result ..................................................................................................... 20
Figure 9: CDF Plot on SINR-DL Drive Test .............................................................................................................. 21
Figure 15 PCI Plot .................................................................................................................................................. 22
Figure 17 CQI Distribution Result .......................................................................................................................... 22
Figure 16 RSRQ Drive Test Result .......................................................................................................................... 23
Figure 18 PS DL Throughput Drive Test Result ...................................................................................................... 24
Figure 19 PS UL Throughput Drive Test Result ...................................................................................................... 25
Figure 21: Channel Bandwidth Plot ...................................................................................................................... 27


Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
Provisional Acceptance shall be conducted after all the sites on air within cluster. If there are
some issues that halt the RFS e.g. due to delayed community case, tower strengthening,
etc, PAC can be conducted when at least 85% of sites are on air within a cluster. In the case
of mushroom site where there is only 1 new site only with existing neighbor sites SSO is
conducted for PAC.
This document presents the result of Cluster Drive test and Network Performance KPI based
on active measurement and OSS data collection for 2018_P4_EJ_4G_222
The drive-test KPIs are evaluated by drive-test coverage and statistic according to the pre-
defined drive-test route that is mutually agreed by both parties.
The results of the measurements are then compared with the passing criteria agreed upon
by XL and HUAWEI.
1.2 General Site Information

General Site Information
Cluster Name 2018_P4_EJ_4G_222
Area Bangkalan
Total number of cluster sites 3 Site
Total number of planned sites 1 Site
Total number of On-Air Macro sites: 3 Site
Total number of Pico Site 0 Site
Total number of pending On-Air Macro Sites 0 Site
Total number of pending On-Air Pico Sites 0 Site
1.2.1 New Site Database

eNB ID LTE Site Name CellID Longitude Latitude TAC PCI Status OA Date
544723 LTE_LERPAK_BANGKALAN 4 112.9338056 -7.024497222 55441 444 Integrated 17-May-18

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
1.2.2 Neighbors First Tier

eNB ID LTE Site Name CellID Longitude Latitude TAC PCI Fix Stats
543403 LTE_SELATAN_GEGER 4 112.93018 -7.0076 55441 234 existing on air
544301 LTE_REP_BATUKOCENG 4 112.9194722 -7.042361111 55441 201 existing on air
1.2.3 Punch List Database
There is no punch list at this Cluster.
Drive Test Methodology “Mobility Assessment”

Drive test shall be performed under below circumstances:
 Cluster is barred / reserved to ensure only single user camp in the cluster using USIM class 11
 HotRod Prioritas profile to be used
LTE Mobile
KPI Measured Remark
No. UE Method RAT BAND
RSRP, RSRQ, PCI 1 laptop, separated

Handset1 Idle Lock LTE LTE 1800
Plot round between UL
Round
& DL Test to
1 HUAWEI Dedicated,
PDCP DL THP, guarantee single
E392 continues Lock LTE LTE 1800 user
SINR
(Modem) download
HUAWEI Dedicated,
E392 continues Lock LTE LTE 1800 PDCP UL THP 1 laptop, separated
(Modem) Upload round between UL
Round
& DL Test to
2 Dedicated, IRAT HO on
Automatic WCDMA / 1800/ guarantee single
Handset 1 continues edge 4G user
(Unlocked) LTE 2100
download coverage

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
1.3 Drive Test Methodology “Stationary Assessment”
Stationary KPI’s will be tested based on the agreed-on methodology with XL team. Cell Edge
Performance for Link Budget Verification will be tested on the spot where the RSRP reaches between
-115dBm to -120dBm at the edge of a cluster.
LTE Mobile
KPI Measured Remark
No. UE Method RAT BAND
Speedtest (OOKLA &
Open Signal) is
required at badspot
area (-<115 dBm)
Static Handset1 Static Lock LTE LTE 1800 Target > 1 Mbps
which is detected
from MR or DT with
maximum 3 spots
with GnetTrack
HotRod Priority
Speed (higher Downlink QoS Test,
QoS) is higher best Condition Spot.
Static Handset 1 Static Lock LTE LTE 1800
than Super Continues
HotRod (lower download > 2 Min
QoS)
1.4 FTP Server Information
IP Address
FTP Server information
IP:103.52.146.236
1.5 Drive Test tool and Detail
Samsung Galaxy S5
DT Tools
GENEX Probe v3.16
Date of DT 01 Desember 2018
DT Team Achmad Afandi

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
2 MAP INFORMATION
2.1 Map Information
Figure 1: Cluster Map Information
2.2 Drive test route, cluster border and coverage prediction
Figure 2: Drive Test Route


Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
Figure 3: Coverage Prediction using Planning Tools & DT Route
PAC Ref
Item Result Target
Site List, Polygon Border, DT Route and Coverage Must be matched with
Match Pass
Prediction match with agred design agreed design

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
Residenttial
2018_P5_EJ_4G_140.xlsx
SubUrban_Open_Area(%)
Road_Open_Area(%)
Coverage Area(km2)
RSRP Criteria (dBm)
% of Coverage Area
Max Vaule (dBm)
Inland_Water(%)
Min Value (dBm)
Green_Land(%)
Percentage (%)
Village(%)
Forest(%)
Scrub(%)
Legend
-85 DL RSRP (dBm)>=-85 Infinity 3.36 1.8 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.5 44.0 25.5 0.0
-90 =-90<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-85 -85 4.50 2.5 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.0 47.3 36.7 0.0
-100 -100<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-90 -90 15.40 8.4 15.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.1 34.8 48.1 0.0
-105 -105<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-100 -100 12.01 6.6 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.2 42.0 35.7 0.0
-115 -115<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-105 -105 40.00 21.9 40.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.1 36.2 40.8 0.0
Infinity DL RSRP (dBm)<-115 -115 24.74 13.6 24.7 0.0 0.0 0.3 20.5 38.2 41.3 0.0
TOTAL 100% 54.8 100%
Figure 4: Residential Prediction using Planning Tools & RSRP Result
3 Performance Result
3.1 NMS KPI LTE (New Site)
Cell KPI Aggregate for 7 days, taken at cell busy hour except for Availability.
Availability is measured within 24 hours in a day. Cell busy hour is defined as the hour
when downlink and uplink payload reach the peak value.
Measurement period:
Before (Start - End) 21-Nov-2018 to 27-Nov-2018

After (Start - End) 28-Nov-2018 to 04-Nov-2018
3.1.1 Availability
Target
No Name CAC Before CAC After Status
(EPL)
1 Cell Availability > 99% 99.91% 100.00% Pass

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.1.2 Accessibility
Target
(EPL)
1 Session Setup Success Rate > 99% 99.88% 99.79% Pass
2 RRC Setup Success Rate > 98% 99.96% 99.91% Pass
3.1.3 Retainability
Target
(EPL)
1 Session Abnormal Release Rate < 1.4% 0.09% 0.06% Pass
3.1.4 Integrity
CAC
No Name Target (EPL) CAC After Status
Before
1 UL Packet Loss (PDCP ) <0.001 5.22E-04 4.97E-04 Pass
2 DL Packet Loss (PDCP ) <0.001 2.07E-05 1.73E-05 Pass
> 15 Mbps (3 MHz)
Info
3 Downlink User Throughput (Peak)* > 50 Mbps (10 MHz) 35.70 Mbps 39.45 Mbps
only*
> 75 Mbps (15 MHz)
> 4.5 Mbps (3 MHz)
Info
4 Uplink User Throughput (Peak)* > 20 Mbps (10 MHz) 18.99 Mbps 18.61 Mbps
only*
> 33 Mbps (15 MHz)
> 5.1 Mbps (3 MHz)
Downlink User Throughput > 17 Mbps (10 MHz) Info
5 1.96 Mbps 2.66 Mbps
(Average)* > 25.5 Mbps (15 only*
MHz)
> 3 Mbps (3 MHz)
Info
6 Uplink User Throughput (Average)* > 10 Mbps (10 MHz) 0.97 Mbps 1.18 Mbps
only*
> 15 Mbps (15 MHz)
7 DL Uu Latency < 8 ms 5.89 ms 3.28 ms Pass
3.1.5 TX_RANK (Info Only)
TX2 TX4 ISD

eNB ID LTE Site Name CID Remarks MIMO
(2T2R) (4T4R) (m)
544637 X4542427E_LTE_Tambak_Wedi_Kenjeran 4 22.66% - Normal 0 MIMO 2T2R


Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.1.6 Mobility
Target CAC CAC

No Name Status
(EPL) Before After
Handover Success Rate Intra-
1 > 98% 99.98% 99.97% Pass
Frequency
Handover Success Rate Inter- Applicable whereby LTE
2 > 98% N/A N/A
Frequency 900/2300 are installed
Handover Success Rate Inter-RAT
3 > 95% 00.00% 00.00% Pass
(PSHO, not RwR)
3.1.7 Utilization
CAC CAC
No Name Target Status
Before After
1 Maximum eNodeB CPU Utilization < 70% 13% 12% Pass
3.1.8 CSFB
No Name Target (EPL) CAC Before CAC After Status

1 Voice - Outgoing Call Setup Time* <5s 4.7s 1.2s Pass
2 Voice - Outgoing Call Setup Success Rate > 97% 100% 100% Pass
3 Voice - Incoming Call Setup Time* < 3.5 s 1.2s 1.2s Pass
4 Voice - Incoming Call Setup Success Rate > 97% 100% 100% Pass
5 Voice - Time to Return to LTE* <5s 1.6s 1.2s Pass
6 Voice - Return to LTE Success Rate* > 97% 100% 100% Pass
* Measured using probe (Smart Care or Anritsu)
3.1.9 Traffic and Capacity
3.1.9.1 Payload
Name CAC Before CAC After
UL Volume (Gigabyte) 121.78 GB 114.97 GB
DL Volume (Gigabyte) 1168.81 GB 1213.33 GB
Trend daily Payload (GB)

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
Sum of UL Traffic Volume Sum of DL Traffic Volume

Date
(GByte) (GByte)
11/28/2018 13.38479781 132.0842866
11/29/2018 15.61320875 172.0732834
11/30/2018 16.67449926 185.3820646
12/1/2018 16.90350905 181.4187014
12/2/2018 21.04366292 212.0229474
12/3/2018 16.14924691 171.3598992
12/4/2018 15.2103103 158.9922988
Grand Total 114.979235 1213.333481
3.2 NMS KPI LTE (Cluster Level)
Cell KPI Aggregate for 7 days, taken at cell busy hour except for Availability.
Availability is measured within 24 hours in a day. Cell busy hour is defined as the hour
when downlink and uplink payload reach the peak value.
Measurement period:
Before (Start - End) 21-Nov-2018 to 27-Nov-2018

After (Start - End) 28-Nov-2018 to 04-Nov-2018
3.2.1 Availability
Target
(EPL)
1 Cell Availability > 99% 99.37% 99.50% Pass
3.2.2 Accessibility
Target
(EPL)

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
1 Session Setup Success Rate > 99% 99.82% 99.81% Pass

2 RRC Setup Success Rate > 98% 99.92% 99.91% Pass
3.2.3 Retainability
Target
(EPL)
1 Session Abnormal Release Rate < 1.4% 0.06% 0.07% Pass
3.2.4 Integrity
CAC
No Name Target (EPL) CAC After Status
Before
1 UL Packet Loss (PDCP ) <0.001 4.73E-04 6.19E-04 Pass
2 DL Packet Loss (PDCP ) <0.001 6.45E-06 1.10E-05 Pass
> 15 Mbps (3 MHz)
Info
3 Downlink User Throughput (Peak)* > 50 Mbps (10 MHz) 39.75 Mbps 39.17 Mbps
only*
> 75 Mbps (15 MHz)
> 4.5 Mbps (3 MHz)
Info
4 Uplink User Throughput (Peak)* > 20 Mbps (10 MHz) 17.55 Mbps 19.43 Mbps
only*
> 33 Mbps (15 MHz)
> 5.1 Mbps (3 MHz)

Downlink User Throughput > 17 Mbps (10 MHz) Info
5 1.29 Mbps 1.48 Mbps
(Average)* > 25.5 Mbps (15 only*
MHz)
> 3 Mbps (3 MHz)
Info
6 Uplink User Throughput (Average)* > 10 Mbps (10 MHz) 1.70 Mbps 1.79 Mbps
only*
> 15 Mbps (15 MHz)
7 DL Uu Latency < 8 ms 5.23 ms 2.58 ms Pass
3.2.5 Mobility
Target CAC CAC

No Name Status
(EPL) Before After
1 > 98% 99.91% 99.97% Pass
Frequency
Handover Success Rate Inter- Applicable whereby LTE
2 > 98% N/A N/A
Frequency 900/2300 are installed
Handover Success Rate Inter-RAT
3 > 95% 00.00% 00.00% Pass
(PSHO, not RwR)

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.2.6 Utilization
CAC CAC
No Name Target Status
Before After
1 Maximum eNodeB CPU Utilization < 70% 38% 36% Pass
3.2.7 CSFB
No Name Target (EPL) CAC Before CAC After Status

1 Voice - Outgoing Call Setup Time* <5s 4.7s 1.2s Pass
2 Voice - Outgoing Call Setup Success Rate > 97% 100% 100% Pass
3 Voice - Incoming Call Setup Time* < 3.5 s 1.2s 1.2s Pass
4 Voice - Incoming Call Setup Success Rate > 97% 100% 100% Pass
5 Voice - Time to Return to LTE* <5s 1.6s 1.2s Pass
6 Voice - Return to LTE Success Rate* > 97% 100% 100% Pass
* Measured using probe (Smart Care or Anritsu)
3.2.8 Traffic and Capacity
3.2.8.1 Payload
Name CAC Before CAC After
UL Volume (Gigabyte) 1491.99 GB 1519.14 GB
DL Volume (Gigabyte) 15145.05 GB 15921.11 GB
Trend daily Payload (GB)
Sum of UL Traffic Volume Sum of DL Traffic Volume

Date
(GByte) (GByte)
11/28/2018 198.2864178 1965.320905
11/29/2018 218.0248763 2288.32945
11/30/2018 211.5704008 2258.401716
12/1/2018 219.9627944 2358.589724
12/2/2018 248.5099007 2627.042744
12/3/2018 214.628932 2234.241195
12/4/2018 208.1583446 2189.189795
Grand Total 1519.141667 15921.11553

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.2.8.2 PRB Utilization

DL PRB UL PRB
DL PRB UL PRB Utilization Utilization
Utilization Utilization (%) (%)
Site ID LTE LTE Site Name CellID
(%) (%) (BH Daily (BH Daily
Max Max averaged averaged
in a week) in a week)
X4542427E LTE_Tambak_Wedi_Kenjeran 4 98.31 31.90 91.09 23.39
*Calculation:
 Busy hour is defined as the hour in which sum DL & UL payload reach the highest value
 Daily : on busy hour, UL/DL PRB utilization is averaged for each cell on each site
 Weekly : averaging daily value
 Provided for information only
3.2.8.3 Number of RRC Connected User

RRC Connected User RRC Connected User
Site ID LTE LTE Site Name
(Average Week, Daily Max) (Average Week, Daily Sum)
X4542427E LTE_Tambak_Wedi_Kenjeran 344 5548
*Calculation:
3.2.8.4 Number of IRAT HO Attempt

IRAT HO Attempt Preparation
Site ID LTE LTE Site Name CellID
(Sum daily, summing on a week)
X4542427E LTE_Tambak_Wedi_Kenjeran 4 N/A
*Calculation:
 Daily : on busy hour, IRAT HO Attempt is summed for each cell toward its relation
 Weekly : summing daily value
Note: Attached xls showing cell relation below:

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.3 Drive Test KPI
3.3.1 Retainability
PAC
No Name Target Status Remark
Result
Session Abnormal In PAC, value is measured on mobility or
1 < 1.4% 0.00% Pass
Release Rate stationary on each PCI
3.3.2 Accessibility
No Name Target PAC Result Status Remark
1 Session Setup Success Rate > 99% 100.00% Pass In PAC, value is measured on
mobility or stationary on
2 RRC Setup Success Rate > 98% 100.00% Pass each PCI
3.3.3 CSFB
No Name Target PAC Result Status Remark
1 Voice - Outgoing Call Setup Time ≤5 s 4.46 s Pass
Voice - Outgoing Call Setup Success In PAC,
2 Rate
>97% 100% Pass value is
measured
3 Voice - Incoming Call Setup Time ≤3.5s 1.28s Pass
on mobility
Voice - Incoming Call Setup Success
4 Rate
>97% 100% Pass
or
stationary
5 Voice - Time to Return to LTE ≤5 s 1.01 s Pass on each PCI
6 Voice - Return to LTE Success Rate >97% 100% Pass
3.3.4 Integrity
No Name Target PAC Result Status
RTT Packet Delay (ping) 32/1000 Pass with
<= 20 ms / 30 ms 43.70 ms / 47.30 ms
1 bytes Justification
2 UL Packet Loss (PDCP ) < 1e-3 0 Pass
3 DL Packet Loss (PDCP ) < 1e-3 0 Pass

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
No Name Target PAC Result Status

> 15 Mbps (3 MHz)
Downlink Peak User Throughput* > 50 Mbps (10 MHz) 50.98 Mbps Info only*
4 > 75 Mbps (15 MHz)
> 4.5 Mbps (3 MHz)
Uplink Peak User Throughput* > 15 Mbps (10 MHz) 21.99 Mbps Info only*
5 > 25 Mbps (15 MHz)
> 4 Mbps (3 MHz)
Pass with
Downlink Average User Throughput > 15 Mbps (10 MHz) 10.80 Mbps justification
6 > 22.5 Mbps (15 MHz)
> 3 Mbps (3 MHz)
Uplink Average User Throughput > 10 Mbps (10 MHz) 17.13 Mbps Pass
7 > 15 Mbps (15 MHz)
8 Jitter (Uplink and Downlink) < 50 ms 43.70 ms Pass
Note: all above values are measured on mobility or stationary on each PCI
*Depends on single user scenario and Transmission Capacity
3.3.5 Mobility
No Name Ref PAC Result Status Remark
1 > 98% 100% Pass 100%
Frequency
Handover Success Rate Inter- Applicable if L900/L2300 are
2 > 98% N/A N/A
Frequency deployed
Handover Success Rate Inter-
3 > 95% 100% Pass 100%
RAT (PSHO, not RwR)

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.3.6 RSRP IDLE Drive Test
Figure 4: RSRP IDLE Drive Test Result
Min Value (dBm) RSRP Criteria (dBm) Max Value (dBm) Percentage (%) Legend
-85 DL RSRP (dBm)>=-85 Infinity 16.04%
-90 -90<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-85 -85 19.99%
-100 -100<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-90 -90 40.78%
-105 -105<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-100 -100 11.12%
-115 -115<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-105 -110 9.87%
-Infinity DL RSRP (dBm)<-115 -115 2.20%
PAC Result
Target Status
(RSRP Plot >-105 dBm Result)
Pass with
In 95% of cluster, the RSRP must be ≥ -105 dBm -109 dBm @ 95%
justification
No low RSRP ( < -105 dBm ) is found near site ± 300m) Not found Pass

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
CDF Plot:
Figure 5: RSRP CDF Distribution
3.3.7 SINR-DL Dedicated Drive Test
Figure 6: SINR-DL Dedicated Drive Test Result


Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
Min Value (dB) SINR Criteria (dB) Max Value (dB) Percentage (%) Legend
20 7.81% Infinity 7.81%
10 48.23% 20 48.23%
3 34.07% 10 34.07%
0 4.40% 3 4.40%
-5 4.08% 0 4.08%
-Infinity 1.41% -5 1.41%
SINR ≥ 3 90.11% Pass
Target PAC Result Status

In 85% of cluster, SINR-DL must be > 3 dB 5 dB @ 85% Pass
No Low SINR (<3 dB) is found near site (± 300m) Not found Pass
CDF Plot :
Figure 7: CDF Plot on SINR-DL Drive Test


Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.3.8 PCI Plot
Figure 8 PCI Plot

No partial / full cross feeder is detected Information only Pass
3.3.9 CQI
Figure 9 CQI Distribution Result


Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
Percentage (%)
Min Value CQI Max Value
10 10 <= CQI Value < 15 2099 69.27%
5 5<= CQI Value < 10 850 28.05%
3 3<= CQI Value < 5 47 1.55%
0 0 <= CQI Value < 3 34 1.12%
Item Status
CQI Distribution* Info Only
3.3.10 RSRQ
RSRQ is provided for information only.
Figure 10 RSRQ Drive Test Result
Min Value (dB) RSRQ Criteria (dB) Max Value (dB) Percentage (%) Legend
-6 RSRQ (dB)>=-6 Infinity 24.24%
-9 -9<=RSRQ (dB)<-6 -6 55.23%
-11 -11<=RSRQ (dB)<-9 -9 14.78%
-14 -14<=RSRQ (dB)<-11 -11 4.61%
-Infinity RSRQ (dB)<-14 -14 1.14%

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.3.11 PS DL Throughput
Figure 11 PS DL Throughput Drive Test Result
Min Value (Mbps) DL Throughput (Mbps) Max Value (Mbps) Percentage (%) Legend
30 DL Throughput (Mbps)>=30 Infinity 8.74%
10 10<=DL Throughput (Mbps)<30 30 53.59%
0 0<DL Throughput (Mbps)<3 3 13.28%
PS DL Drive Test Target PAC Result Status

No low DL throughput ( < 3 Mbps) near site ( ± 300m) Not Found Pass
*PS DL Throughput test do in normal mode without cell bar.

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.3.12 PS UL Throughput
Figure 12 PS UL Throughput Drive Test Result
Min Value (Mbps) UL Throughput (Mbps) Max Value (Mbps) Percentage (%) Legend
15 UL Throughput (Mbps)>=15 Infinity 42.48%
10 10<=UL Throughput (Mbps)<15 15 24.64%
0 0<UL Throughput (Mbps)<3 3 6.06 %
PS UL Drive Test Target PAC Result Status

No low DL throughput ( < 3 Mbps) near site ( ± 300m) Not Found Pass
*PS UL Throughput test do in normal mode without cell bar.

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.3.13 Transmission Modes Plot
Note: provided for information only
Figure 20: Transmission Mode Plot
MIMO Check Result

eNB ID eNB Name ID
Design Implementation
544723 LTE_LERPAK_BANGKALAN 4 MIMO MIMO
543403 LTE_SELATAN_GEGER 4 MIMO MIMO

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.3.14 Channel Bandwidth Plot
Note: provided for information only
Figure 13: Channel Bandwidth Plot
3.3.15 Event Failed
No event failed found.
Event
2018_P5_EJ_4G_140.xlsx
3.3.16 Sleeping Cell Identification
Cellname RACH SR (%) Status

SB4G18_4542427E_4 78.38% No Sleeping Cell

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.3.17 External Interference Identification

No external interference is found Not found Information only
3.3.18 Cell Overshooting

No Found site overshooting
Inter Site
Distance Overshooting
Site name Cell name Target Remark
Factor
(KM)
1822_KENJERAN SB4G18_4541822E_4 0 >=80% 100 Pass
1822_KENJERAN SB4G18_4541822E_5 4562 >=80% 99.99974 Pass
1822_KENJERAN SB4G18_4541822E_6 1822 >=80% 99.75856 Pass
2542838_DukuhBulakBanteng SB4G18_4542838E_4 1180 >=80% 99.98504 Pass
2542838_DukuhBulakBanteng SB4G18_4542838E_5 1148 >=80% 100 Pass
2542838_DukuhBulakBanteng SB4G18_4542838E_6 605 >=80% 99.96382 Pass
C863_KEDUNG COWEK SB4G18_454C863E_4 903 >=80% 97.67098 Pass
C863_KEDUNG COWEK SB4G18_454C863E_5 1102 >=80% 99.99965 Pass
C863_KEDUNG COWEK SB4G18_454C863E_6 1587 >=80% 100 Pass
254C930_TambakWediAxis SB4G18_454C930E_4 6515 >=80% 99.89931 Pass
MC254C516_BulakBantengWetan SB4G18_MC454C516E_4 680 >=80% 99.99931 Pass
MC254C516_BulakBantengWetan SB4G18_MC454C516E_5 1688 >=80% 100 Pass
MC254C516_BulakBantengWetan SB4G18_MC454C516E_6 605 >=80% 99.86136 Pass
X3542427G_3G_Tambak_Wedi_Kenjeran SB4G18_4542427E_4 0 >=80% 100 Pass
X3542427G_3G_Tambak_Wedi_Kenjeran SB4G18_4542427E_5 1788 >=80% 96.36409 Pass
X3542427G_3G_Tambak_Wedi_Kenjeran SB4G18_4542427E_6 683 >=80% 83.07241 Pass

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.3.19 Bad Spot Optimization Result
3.3.19.1 Bad spot on PCI
PCI BEFORE PCI AFTER
3.3.20 Bad Spot analysis and Improvement

All bad spots are improved 3 badspot remain with justification Pass with justification
3.3.20.1 Bad spot on RSRP
RSRP Before RSRP After


Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
System Level Legend Before After

DL RSRP (dBm)>=-85 17.13% 19.00%
-90<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-85 21.40% 22.00%
-100<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-90 38.22% 39.32% In 95% of cluster, the RSRP must be ≥ -105 dBm
LTE -105<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-100 10.64% 9.47% is improve from 96.78% to 98.03%
-115<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-105 9.40% 8.25%

DL RSRP (dBm)<-115 3.22% 1.97%
Pass 96.78% 98.03%
3.3.20.2 Bad spot on SINR
SINR Before SINR After

SINR (dB)>=20 3.17% 7.81%
10<=SINR (dB)<20 40.95% 48.23%
3<=SINR (dB)<10 41.48% 34.07%
SINR >3 is improve from 85.60 % to 90.11%
LTE 0<=SINR (dB)<3 6.82% 4.40%
-5<=SINR (dB)<0 5.21% 4.08%
SINR (dB)<-5 2.37% 1.41%
Pass 85.60% 90.11%

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.3.20.3 Bad Spot on DL Throughput
DL BEFORE DL AFTER
DL Throughput (Mbps)>=30 2.21% 8.74%
10<=DL Throughput (Mbps)<30 39.74% 53.59%

PDCP > 10Mbps is improve from 41.95% to 62.33%
LTE
0<DL Throughput (Mbps)<3 25.32% 13.28%
PDCP > 10Mbps 41.95% 62.33%

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.3.20.4 Bad Spot on UL throughput
UL BEFORE UL AFTER
UL Throughput (Mbps)>=15 30.45% 42.48%

10<=UL Throughput (Mbps)<15 25.01% 24.64%
5<=UL Throughput (Mbps)<10 25.79% 22.08% PDCP > 10Mbps is improve from 55.46% to 67.12%
LTE
3<=UL Throughput (Mbps)<5 7.52% 4.75%
0<UL Throughput (Mbps)<3 11.00% 6.06 %

PDCP > 10Mbps 55.46% 67.12%

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
3.3.20.5 Root cause and Action taken
No Root Cause Longitude Latitude Action taken

Bad RSRP SINR in line with bad DL and UL throughput Due
Propose new site at 112.955770°
to coverage issue far from nearest site and contour. Bad
1 -7.022186° -7.023880° to cover bad spot on
spot already covered by main lobe site LTE_KOMBANGAN 112.953485°
potential area
sec 2 with distance 2.74km
Bad RSRP SINR in line with UL throughput Due to coverage Already do optimization &
issue far from nearest site and contour. Bad spot already physical tuning audit on site:
2 112.922513° -7.031422°
covered by side lobe site LTE_LERPAK_BANGKALAN sec 2 with LTE_LERPAK_BANGKALAN sector 2
distance 1.48 km from Mk 1 to Mk 2.
Already do optimization &
Bad RSRP due to coverage issue far from nearest site and
physical tuning audit on site:
3 contour. Bad spot already covered by main lobe site 112.910836° -7.051427°
LTE_REP_BATUKOCENG sec 2 from
LTE_REP_BATUKOCENG sec 2 with distance 1.03 km
azimuth 190 to azimuth 195.
Bad DL throughput Due to coverage issue far from nearest
4 site and contour. Bad spot already covered by main lobe 112.928406° -7.018309° No potential area
site LTE_SELATAN_GEGER sec 3 with distance 1.56 km
Bad RSRP SINR in line with bad DL and UL throughput Due
to coverage issue far from nearest site and contour. Bad Propose upgrade bandwidth site
5 112.938217° -7.000218°
spot already covered by main lobe site LTE_SELATAN_GEGER LTE_SELATAN_GEGER
3.3.1 Physical Tuning Summary
NEW SITE AND 1st TIER NEIGHBOR SITE BEFORE FINAL

LONG LAT TAC BW
Site ID Site Name Cell ID TYPE H/AZ/E/M H/AZ/E/M
4542545E LTE_LERPAK_BANGKALAN 4 112.93380556 -7.0244972 55441 10 MHz Outdoor 70/9/6/1 70/9/6/2
4544458E LTE_SELATAN_GEGER 4 112.93018 -7.0076 55441 10 MHz Outdoor 50/20/2/1 50/20/2/1
454A618E LTE_REP_BATUKOCENG 4 112.919472 -7.042361 55448 10 MHz Outdoor 51/30/8/6 51/20/8/6
3.3.1 Parameter Tuning Summary
No Parameter tuning or optimization done since the coverage already follow RF design &
parameter standard (CDD) already implemented sucscessfully.

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
4 NMS KPI RAN LTE TREND (New Site)

Availability Session Setup Success Rate
Cell AvailabilityRate is maintained above Session Setup Success Rate is maintained above
reference value99% reference value99%
RRC Setup Success Rate Session Abnormal Release Rate
RRC Setup Success Rate is maintained above Session Abnormal Release Rate is maintained
reference value 98% below reference value 1.4 %
UL/DL PDCP Packet Loss UL/DL Average Cell Throughput
Cell DL Throughput Average is 14Mbps, Cell UL

PDPCP UL/DL Packet Loss performance is below
Throughput Average is 4 Mbps.(Only for
reference value 1e-3.
Information)

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
HOSR Intra-frequency IRAT-HO SR
Handover Success Rate Intra Frequency is Handover Success Rate Inter RAT Frequency is
maintained above reference value 98.00% maintained above reference value 95.00%
Processor Load 4G User Throughput
eNodeB processor load maximum is lower 3G and LTE User Number actually no issue.
below reference value 70.00 %. (Only for Information)
2G 3G LTE Payload Trend LTE User Number
Payload actually no issue (only for information) Throughput actually no issue(only for information)
Figure 23: NMS KPI Trend


Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
5 NMS KPI RAN LTE TREND (Cluster Level)

Availability Session Setup Success Rate
Cell AvailabilityRate is maintained above Session Setup Success Rate is maintained above
reference value99% reference value99%
RRC Setup Success Rate Session Abnormal Release Rate
RRC Setup Success Rate is maintained above Session Abnormal Release Rate is maintained
reference value 98% below reference value 1.4 %
UL/DL PDCP Packet Loss UL/DL Average Cell Throughput
Cell DL Throughput Average is 14Mbps, Cell UL

PDPCP UL/DL Packet Loss performance is below
Throughput Average is 4 Mbps.(Only for
reference value 1e-3.
Information)

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
HOSR Intra-frequency IRAT-HO SR
Handover Success Rate Intra Frequency is Handover Success Rate Inter RAT Frequency is
maintained above reference value 98.00% maintained above reference value 95.00%
Processor Load 4G User Throughput
eNodeB processor load maximum is lower 3G and LTE User Number actually no issue.
below reference value 70.00 %. (Only for Information)
2G 3G LTE Payload Trend LTE User Number
Payload actually no issue (only for information) Throughput actually no issue(only for information)

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
Figure 23: NMS KPI Trend
6 KPI 2G & 3G
Drive Test is out of LTE vendor scope of work, hence the 2G & 3G DT KPI would be reviewed
during quarterly Drive Test with PTHS. Therefore, the 2G & 3G aspect only review the NMS
KPI, plus MRR data of 3G in PAC report.
The target for NMS KPI is maintained of improved, comparing the best week (within 3 weeks)
after Frequency Carving/TRX Shutdown versus the week when PAC is collected.
2G & 3G nodes involved are applicable for nodes which are inside LTE polygon, regardless
they have collocated LTE installed or not. All KPI, except availability are calculated during
busy hour-payload UL+DL daily, averaged within a week. Availability is monitored 24 hr
daily.
6.1 List of 2G, 3G & LTE sites inside LTE Polygon

Item Target PAC Result Status
Site List 2G & 3G inside the polygon is Must be matched
Match Pass
matched with actual with actual

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
6.2 NMS 2G
KPI Baseline Week 1 PAC Week 2 Comments
Assignment Success Rate 98.53 99.06031944 Improved
Perceive Drop Rate 1.27 0.78547619 Improved
Perceive Congestion Rate 0.36 0.460227778 Maintain
SDCCH Drop Rate 0.43 0.182572222 Improved
SDCCH Congestion Rate 0.05 0.041752778 Improved
SDCCH Success Rate 99.94 99.95783611 Improved
TBF Failure Rate 0.12 0.167116667 Maintain
Cell Availability 99.98 99.91286111 Improved
HO Success Rate 97.94 97.837375 Maintain
* Fill commentswith: Degraded or Maintained or Improved according to current week compared with baseline
6.3 NMS 3G
KPI Baseline Week 1 PAC Week 2 Comments
RRC Success Rate 99.2 99.05585406 Maintain
Speech Access Rate 99.52 99.69875857 Improved
PS Access Rate 99.2 98.90206286 Maintain
Speech Drop Rate 0.35 0.329594286 Improved
PS Drop Rate 3.66 0.381028571 Improved
RAB Congestion 0.02 0.000741429 Improved
Cell Availability 99.6 99.02810286 Maintain
CS IRAT-HO SR 99.9 99.58664 Maintain
6.4 MRR 3G
During LTE Optimization process, some physical tuning might be executed to enhance LTE quality.
While in some sites, the antenna is shared between 3G and LTE. Therefore, LTE vendor must provide
the MRR before and after physical tuning is executed. The CPICH RSCP must be maintained, or if due
to less sample, the deviation of 2% is accepted.

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
MR RSCP
RSCP Range MR Number Percentage (%)

(-65.00_Inf] 1 0.05%
(-75.00_-65.00] 71 3.72%
(-85.00_-75.00] 358 18.75%
(-95.00_-85.00] 1000 52.38%
(-Inf_-95.00] 479 25.09%
Total 1909 100.00%
Reference MR Number CAC Result Status

RSCP ≥ -95 dBm 1430 74.91% Only for Information

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
MR EcIo
EcIo Range MR Number Percentage (%)

(-4.00_Inf] 0 0.00%
(-8.00_-4.00] 4 0.20%
(-12.00_-8.00] 621 31.10%
(-16.00_-12.00] 1363 68.25%
(-Inf_-25.00] 9 0.45%
Total 1997 100.00%
Reference MR Number CAC Result Status

EcIo ≥ -12 dB 625 31.30% Only for Information

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
7 FEATURE
PAC acceptance validates the feature state on each RAN LTE nodes. The validation refers to Bill of Quantity
stated in Purchased Order with the actual feature status on the node. The feature may be applicable on the cell
level, site level (eNB) or RRC Connected user level. Each LTE vendor may have their own feature ID.
We define 2 type of feature:
- Basic: standard deliverables on each product package
- Optional: selectable feature chosen by customer.
RECOMME
FEATURE FEATURE BoQ Current
FEATURES FEATURE ID NDED
DOMAIN TYPE Checking Status
BASELINE
CS Fallback to UTRAN LOFD-001033 RF Optional YES ON ON
CS Fallback to GERAN LOFD-001034 RF Optional YES OFF OFF
CS Fallback with LAI to
LOFD-001069 RF Optional YES OFF OFF
GERAN
LoCation Services(LCS) LOFD-001047 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Support of UE
LOFD-001030 RF Optional YES ON ON
Category2/3/4
Enhanced Scheduling LOFD-001015 RF Optional YES ON ON
Active Queue
LOFD-001027 RF Optional YES Trial Trial
Management(AQM)
Enhanced Admission
Control
PS Inter-RAT Mobility
between E-UTRAN and LOFD-001020 RF Optional YES OFF OFF
GERAN
Security Mechanism LOFD-001010 Product Optional YES ON ON
Temporary Temporar
Intra-LTE Load Balancing LOFD-001032 RF Optional YES
OFF y OFF
Intra-LTE User Number Temporary Temporar
LOFD-070215 RF Optional YES
Load Balancing OFF y OFF
PS Inter-RAT Mobility
between E-UTRAN and LOFD-001019 RF Optional YES ON ON
UTRAN
RObust Header Temporary Temporar
Compression (ROHC) OFF y OFF
Flash CS Fallback to
UTRAN
Flash CS Fallback to
GERAN
Temporary Temporar
Flexible User Steering LOFD-001054 RF Optional YES
OFF y OFF

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
RECOMME
BASELINE
Inter-RAT Load Sharing
to UTRAN
UL Interference
Rejection Combining
Automatic Neighbour
Relation(ANR)
Self-configuration LOFD-002004 Product Optional YES ON ON
PCI Collision Detection &
Self-Optimization
Mobility Robust
Optimization (MRO)
Remote Electrical Tilt
LOFD-001024 Product Optional YES Scene On Scene On
Control
RIM Based LTE Target Temporary Temporar
Cell Selection OFF y OFF
DL 2x2 MIMO LOFD-001001 RF Optional YES ON ON
Enhanced Transmission
LOFD-003011 Product Optional YES ON ON
QoS Management
IP Performance Temporary Temporar
LOFD-003012 Product Optional YES
Monitoring OFF y OFF
S1 and X2 over IPv6 LOFD-003017 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
IPsec LOFD-003009 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Public Key
LOFD-003010 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Infrastructure(PKI)
Integrated Firewall LOFD-003014 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
S1-flex LOFD-001018 Product Optional YES ON ON
2G/3G and LTE Co-
transmission
UL 64QAM LOFD-001006 RF Optional YES ON ON
Inter-RAT ANR LOFD-002002 RF Optional YES Trial Trial
RACH Optimization LOFD-002015 RF Optional YES Scene On Scene On
RF Channel Intelligent
Shutdown
PSU Intelligent Sleep
Mode
Temporary Temporar
UL 2x2 MU-MIMO LOFD-001002 RF Optional YES
OFF y OFF
Intra-eNodeB UL CoMP LOFD-001066 RF Optional YES ON ON
LOFD-
CQI Adjustment RF Optional YES ON ON
00101501
LOFD-
Dynamic Scheduling RF Optional YES ON ON
00101502
Control Channel IRC LOFD-001094 RF Optional YES Trial Trial

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
RECOMME
BASELINE
CS Fallback with LAI to
UTRAN
Temporary Temporar
SRVCC to UTRAN LOFD-001022 RF Optional YES
OFF y OFF
Intelligent Access Class
LOFD-070207 RF Optional YES Scene On Scene On
Control
IP Active Performance
Measurement
Dynamic Inter-Cell
Interference LOFD-001014 RF Optional YES OFF OFF
Coordination
LAOFD-
Static TDM eICIC RF Optional YES OFF OFF
002001
Temporary Temporar
TTI Bundling LOFD-001048 RF Optional YES
OFF y OFF
LAOFD-
FeICIC RF Optional YES OFF OFF
081234
SFN LOFD-003029 RF Optional YES Scene On Scene On
CPRI Compression LOFD-001076 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Cell Outage Detection
LOFD-002012 Product Optional YES ON ON
and Compensation
Enhanced
Synchronization
IPsec for IPv6 LOFD-003024 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Ethernet OAM LOFD-003004 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Antenna Fault Detection LOFD-002011 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Multi-mode BS Common
MRFD-231601 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Reference Clock
Below is the detail log file on feature validation:
Criteria Result Remark
Feature status matched with BoQ Match Pass


Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
7 Issues, Recommendation and Exclusion

Below is the explanation of the KPI that does not meet the target.
7.1.1 Ping Latency 32bit
t1 t2 t3 t4
t1' t2' t3' t4'

UE eNodeB SGW PGW FTP
t1 ≈ t1’、t2 ≈ t2’、t3 ≈ t3’、t4 ≈ t4’

RTT = t1
Ping Latency (UE to FTP) = t1 + t2 + t3 + t4 + t4’ + t3’ + t2’ + t1’ = 34.45 ms (UE ping
Huawei FTP)
Ping Latency (eNodeB to SGW) = t2 + t2’ = 39 ms
Ping Latency(UE to FTP) − Ping Latency(eNodeB to SGW) 34.45−39

t1 +t3 +t4 = = = 2.27 ms
2 2
RTT = t1 = 1.8ms – t3 – t4 < 8ms (Target)

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
7.1.2 Ping latency 1000bit
t1 t2 t3 t4
t1' t2' t3' t4'

UE eNodeB SGW PGW FTP
t1 ≈ t1’、t2 ≈ t2’、t3 ≈ t3’、t4 ≈ t4’

RTT = t1
Ping Latency (UE to FTP) = t1 + t2 + t3 + t4 + t4’ + t3’ + t2’ + t1’ = 46.60ms (UE ping
Huawei FTP)
Ping Latency (eNodeB to SGW) = t2 + t2’ = 38 ms
Ping Latency(UE to FTP) − Ping Latency(eNodeB to SGW) 46.60−38

t1 +t3 +t4 = = = 4.3ms
2 2
RTT = t1 = 5.33ms – t3 – t4 < 8ms (Target)
7.2 KPI 2G & 3G
KPI 2G & 3G are maintained
7.3 Justification

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
Bad Spot 1 Root Cause Longitude Latitude Action taken

Bad RSRP SINR in line with bad DL and UL throughput Propose new site at
Bad RSRP SINR DL Due to coverage issue far from nearest site and 112.955770° -7.023880°
12.953485° -7.022186°
and UL spot 1 contour. Bad spot already covered by main lobe site to cover bad spot on
LTE_KOMBANGAN sec 2 with distance 2.74km potential area

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
Bad spot 2 Root Cause Longitude Latitude Action taken

Bad RSRP SINR in line with UL throughput Due to
Already do optimization &
coverage issue far from nearest site and contour.
Bad RSRP SINR physical tuning audit on site:
Bad spot already covered by side lobe site 112.922513° -7.031422°
and UL spot 2 LTE_LERPAK_BANGKALAN sector
LTE_LERPAK_BANGKALAN sec 2 with distance 1.48
2 from Mk 1 to Mk 2.
km

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra

Bad RSRP due to coverage issue far from Already do optimization &
nearest site and contour. Bad spot already physical tuning audit on site:
Bad RSRP
covered by main lobe site 112.910836° -7.051427° LTE_REP_BATUKOCENG sec 2
spot 3
LTE_REP_BATUKOCENG sec 2 with distance 1.03 from azimuth 190 to azimuth
km 195.

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra

Bad DL throughput due to coverage issue far
from nearest site and contour. Bad spot
Bad DL spot 4 already covered by main lobe site 112.048873° -7.672218° No potential area
LTE_SELATAN_GEGER sec 3 with distance 1.56
km

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra

Bad RSRP SINR in line with bad DL and UL
Bad RSRP, throughput Due to coverage issue far from
Propose upgrade bandwidth
SINR, DL and nearest site and contour. Bad spot already 112.938217° -7.000218°
site LTE_SELATAN_GEGER
UL spot 5 covered by main lobe site LTE_SELATAN_GEGER

Waqas/ Kiki Chandra
8 Conclusions
We conclude that PAC of Cluster 2018_P4_EJ_4G_222 is:
Pass, without note 

Pass, with note 
Not pass 
*Tick one appropriate result

Cluster Acceptance Certificate (CAC) Lte Project

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cluster Acceptance Certificate (CAC) Lte Project

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

LTE NEW SITE PAC DOCUMENT 1 (52)

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name