Kanti Bal Hospital Slope Stability Analysis Rev Report Sept 20, 2018 PDF

SLOPE STABILITY VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS
of
Kanti Bal Medical Hospital Building Site
At
Maharajgunj, Kathmandu
Kanti Bal Hospital,Maharajgunj

Kathmandu
Submitted By
GS G.S. Soil & Materials Engineers (P) Ltd

Sinamangal, Gairigaun, Kathmandu, Nepal
P.O. Box 20716, Email: gsgroup.jain@gmail.com
Web: www.gsconsortium.com
Cell 9851118335, Off, 00977-01-4112078
September, 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................................................... 3
SOIL BODY ............................................................................................................................................................................... 4
INFLUENCE OF WATER ........................................................................................................................................................ 4
1.Ground water table ......................................................................................................................................................... 4
2.Ground water table including suction ........................................................................................................................ 4
3.Coefficient of pore pressure ru .................................................................................................................................... 4
4.Pore pressure values ..................................................................................................................................................... 5
SURCHARGE ........................................................................................................................................................................... 5
ANCHORS ................................................................................................................................................................................. 6
EARTHQUAKE EFFECT ......................................................................................................................................................... 6
Coefficient of vertical earthquake Kv ............................................................................................................................ 6
Factor of horizontal acceleration Kh.............................................................................................................................. 6
ANALYSIS OF SLOPE STABILITY ACCORDING TO THE THEORY OF LIMIT STATES / FACTOR OF SAFETY 7
SHARMA METHOD OF IDENTIFICATION OF FAILURE PLANE .................................................................................... 8
Analysis process ................................................................................................................................................................ 8
Computation of limit equilibrium .................................................................................................................................... 8
OPTIMIZATION OF POLYGONAL SLIP SURFACE .................................................................................................... 11
CHANGING INCLINATION OF DIVIDING PLANES ..................................................................................................... 12
FOLIATION ......................................................................................................................................................................... 12
FELLENIUS / PETTERSON .................................................................................................................................................. 12
BISHOP.................................................................................................................................................................................... 12
SPENCER ................................................................................................................................................................................ 13
OPTIMIZATION OF CIRCULAR SLIP SURFACE ........................................................................................................ 13
INFLUENCE OF TENSILE CRACKS .................................................................................................................................. 13
REMEDIAL MEASURES OF SLOPE STABILITY ............................................................................................................. 14
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................ 14
MODIFICATION/CHANGE OF SLOPE GEOMETRY ................................................................................................... 14
CONTROL OF SURFACE WATER [DRAINAGE] ........................................................................................................ 14
RETAINING STRUCTURES ............................................................................................................................................. 14
INTERNAL SLOPE REINFORCEMENT TO INCREASE THE INTERNAL FRICTION AND LENGTH OF
FAILURE PLANE FOR STABILITY ................................................................................................................................ 15
OUTPUT SUMMARY OF THE CRITICAL SEVEN SECTIONS ....................................................................................... 16
SUMMARY OF THE OUTPUT OF THE SLOPE STABILTY ANALYSIS FOR EXISTING CONDITION ............... 16
SUMMARY OF THE OUTPUT OF THE SLOPE STABILTY ANALYSIS CONSIDERING BUILDING
SURCHARGE ..................................................................................................................................................................... 16
SUMMARY OF THE OUTPUT OF THE SLOPE STABILTY ANALYSIS CONSIDERING BUILDING
SURCHARGE ..................................................................................................................................................................... 16
DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDATION FROM THE SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS ................................................. 17
ANNEXURE-1 ......................................................................................................................................................................... 18
SITE SURVEY DATA ............................................................................................................................................................ 18
SURCHARGE LOADS FROM THE UPCOMING ADDITIONAL BLOCKS OF KANTI BAL HOSPITAL ................. 18
CALCULATION INPUT & OUTPUT SUMMARY OF THE SLOPE STAILITY ANALYSIS ......................................... 18
1
ANNEXURE-2 ......................................................................................................................................................................... 19
DESIGN DRAWINGS OF THE SLOPE STAILITY ANALYSIS ........................................................................................ 19
2
SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
The scope of the study under this SOW is the slope behind the back yard of Existing Kanti Bal hospital located in the
heart of Kathmandu city at Maharajgunj Teaching Hospital. Near to the adjacent of the slope at backyard, the
proposed Kanti Bal hospital additional building needs to be constructed. For which the slope stability of the existing
slope under existing condition and in earthquake condition before and after the building surcharge load on the slope
needs to be analyzed with factor of safety of the slip failure plane. In order to analyze the existing slope, we have
done the detail topographic survey of the entire building area where the upcoming building needs to be constructed
along with the entire stretch up to the base of the slope where this influence occurs so that we can identify the possible
critical slope near to the upcoming additional block of Kanti Bal hospital. After the analyzing the topographic map of
the site, we have identified critical 7 sections which runs beneath the upcoming building footing and has the critical
slope angle and stretch of slope for possible failure plane. The analysis of each of the critical sections namely, Section
1-1, 2-2, 3-3, 4-4, 5-5, 6-6 and 8-8 has been done in five stages of construction. Namely
1. Frist one the evaluation of the critical failure slope on existing condition without any earthquake and building
surcharge effect in consideration.
2. The second one is the evaluation of the critical failure slope on existing condition using Earthquake effect in
order find out the slope vulnerability under major seismic event.
3. The third one is the evaluation of the critical failure slope under the building surcharge load with applying the
restriction to identify the critical failure slip plane starting beneath the footing surcharge and end up to the
base of the slope.
4. The last fourth one is the evaluation of critical failure slope with earthquake effect under the building
surcharge load with applying the restriction to identify the critical failure slip plane starting beneath the footing
surcharge and end up to the base of the slope and
5. The last Fifth one is the possible remedial measures to prevent the slope failure occurring beneath the footing
level up to the base of slope. As a part of remedial measures, we have implemented two different solutions
for the slope stability measures.
a. One is to use the RCC bored pile with sufficient numbers and length under each of the
Isolated/Combined footing in order to transmit the force beneath the failure plane as well as
preventing the slope failure propagation beneath the foundation.
b. Another one is to use the sufficient numbers, length and spacing’s of Soil anchors along the entire
stretch of the slope in order to prevent the slope failure.
It is obvious that the second one is the global solution but needs more budget funds as compared to the first option
where few numbers of RCC piles under each footing can prevent our upcoming building collapse under failure plane.
All the slope stability analysis of seven critical section, soil profile has been taken from the provided soil investigation
report which shows the water table at -15m below the existing ground level.
The slope stability problem is solved in a two dimensional environment. The soil in a slope body can be found below
the ground water table, water can also exceed the slope ground, which can be either partially or completely flooded.
The slope can be loaded by a surcharge of a general shape either on the ground or inside the soil body. The analysis
allows for including the effect of anchors expected to support the slope. An earthquake can also be accounted for in
the analysis.
Two types of approaches to the stability analysis are implemented in the program – classical analysis according to
the factor of safety and the analysis following the theory of limit states.
The slip surface can be modeled in two different ways. Either as a circular one, then the user may choose either from
the Fellenius/Petterson, Bishop or Spencer method, or as a polygonal one, in which case the program exploits the
Sarma or Spencer method.
3
SOIL BODY
The soil body is formed by a layered profile. An arbitrary number of layers can be used. Each layer is defined by its
geometry and material. The material of a layer is usually represented by a soil with specified properties. The geostatic
stress in a soil body is determined during the analysis.
A layer can be specified also as a rigid body. Such layer then represents bedrock or a sheeting wall. The slip surface
can never pass through the rigid body.
INFLUENCE OF WATER
Ground water can be assigned to the slope plane section using one of the four options:
1. Ground water table

The ground water table is specified as a polygon. It can be arbitrarily curved, placed totally within the soil
body or introduced partially above the ground surface.
When using the circular slip surface, the water influence is accounted for through the pore pressure acting
within a soil and reducing its shear bearing capacity. The pore pressure is considered as the hydrostatic
pressure. Assuming inclined slip surface, the pore pressure is determined by taking into account the actual
shape of phreatic line. Below the ground water table, the analysis proceeds using the unit weight of saturated
soil γsat and uplift pressure; above the ground water table the analysis assumes the inputted unit weight of
soil γ. The shear forces along the slip surface are provided by:
𝑇 = (𝑁 − 𝑈)𝑡𝑔𝜑 − 𝑐𝑑
where: T - shear force along slip surface segment
N - normal force along slip surface segment
U - pore pressure resultant along slip surface segment
φ - angle of internal friction
c - cohesion
d - length of slip surface segment
When selecting the polygonal slip surface, the unit weight of soil under water ϒsu is considered and the
corresponding equations of equilibrium are modified by adding the flow pressure J written as:
𝐽 = 𝐴𝛾𝑤 𝑆𝑖𝑛𝛼
where: A - block area
ϒw - unit weight of water
α - inclination of section along given block
2. Ground water table including suction

Suction table can be introduced above the inputted ground water table. A negative value of pore pressure U
is then assumed with the region separated by the two tables. Suction increases as negative hydrostatic
pressure from the ground water table towards the suction table.
3. Coefficient of pore pressure ru

The coefficient of pore pressure ru represents the ratio between the pore pressure and hydrostatic pressure
in a soil body. The inputted unit weight of soil γ is used within the entire slope regardless of the magnitudes
of inputted coefficients ru.
4
The values of ru are introduced with the help of isolines connecting points with the same value of ru. Linear
interpolation is assumed to obtain intermediate values. Computation of shear forces is then influenced in the
following way:
𝑇 = (𝑁 − 𝐺𝑟𝑢 )𝑡𝑔𝜑 − 𝑐𝑑
where: T - shear force along slip surface segment
N - normal force along slip surface segment
G - resultant of geostatic stress along slip surface segment
φ - angle of internal friction
c - cohesion
d - length of slip surface segment
4. Pore pressure values
Ground water can be introduced directly through the pore pressure values with the plane section of a soil
body.
The inputted unit weight of soil γ is used within the entire slope regardless of the magnitudes of inputted pore
pressure values.
The pore pressure values are introduced with the help of isolines connecting points with the same value of
pore pressure. Linear interpolation is assumed to obtain intermediate values. The magnitudes of resultants
of pore pressure are then derived from the values of pore pressure obtained in specific points within the slope
plane section.
SURCHARGE
The slope stability analysis takes into account even the surcharge caused by neighboring structures. The surcharge
can be introduced either as a concentrated force or distributed load acting either on the ground surface or inside the
soil body.
Since it is usually assumed that the surcharge is caused by the weight of objects found on the slope body, the vertical
component of surcharge having the direction of weight is added to the weight of blocks (slices). It means that if the
earthquake effects are included this component is also multiplied by the factor of horizontal acceleration or vertical
earthquake. The components that do not act in the direction of weight are assumed in equations of equilibrium written
for a given block (slice) as weightless thus do not contribute to inertia effects of the earthquake.
The surcharge is always considered in the analysis with respect to one meter run. Providing the surcharge, essentially
acting over the area b x l, is introduced as a concentrated force it is transformed before running the analysis into a
surface loading spread up to a depth of slip surface along the slope 2:1 as displayed in figure.
The analysis then proceeds with the resultant of surface load p having the value:
5
𝑃
𝑝=
(𝑏 + ℎ𝑠 )𝑙
ANCHORS
Anchor is specified by two points and a force. The first point is always located on the ground surface; the force
always acts in the direction of a soil body. The anchor force when computing equilibrium on a given block (slice) is
added to the weightless surcharge of the slope.
Two options are available to account for anchors:

1. Compute anchor forces – analysis assumes infinite lengths of anchors (anchors are always included in the
analysis) and computes the required lengths of links anchors (distance between the anchor head and
intersection of anchor with the slip surface) subsequently. The anchor root is then placed behind the slip
surface. This approach is used whenever we wish the anchor to be always active and thus contribute to
increase the slope stability and we need to know its minimum distance.
2. Analysis with specified lengths of anchors – the analysis takes into account only those anchors that have
their end points (center of roots) behind the slip surface. This approach is used always whenever we wish to
evaluate the current state of slope with already existing anchors, since it may happen that some of the
anchors may prove to be short to intersect the critical slip surface so that they do not contribute to increase
the slope stability.
EARTHQUAKE EFFECT
The program allows for computing the earthquake effects with the help of two variables – factor of horizontal
acceleration Kh or the coefficient of vertical earthquake Kv.
Coefficient of vertical earthquake Kv

The coefficient of vertical earthquake either increases (Kv > 0) or decreases (Kv < 0) the unit weight of a soil, water in
a soil and surcharge by multiplying the respective values by 1+Kv. It is worth to note that the coefficient Kv may receive
both positive and negative value and in case of sufficiently large coefficient of horizontal acceleration the slope
relieves (Kv < 0) is more unfavorable than the surcharge. In our case, Kv = 0 has been assumed in calculation.
Factor of horizontal acceleration Kh

In a general case the computation is carried out assuming a zero value of the factor Kh. This constant, however, can
be exploited to simulate the effect of earthquake by setting a non-zero value. This value represents a ratio between
horizontal and gravity accelerations. Increasing the factor Kh results in a corresponding decrease of the factor of
safety FS.
The coefficient of horizontal acceleration introduces into the analysis an additional horizontal force acting in the center
of gravity of a respective slice with the magnitude Kh*Wi, where Wi is the slice overall weight including the gravity
component of the slope surcharge.
The following table lists the values of the factor Kh that correspond to different degrees of earthquake based on M-C-
S scale.
M-C-S degree Horizontal acceleration Factor of horizontal acceleration
6
(MSK-64) [m/s2] Kh [ in terms of g]
1 0,0 0.0
2 0.0025 0.00025
3 0.005 0.0005
4 0.001 0.0001
5 0.025 0,.0025
6 0.050 0.005
7 0.100 0.010
8 0.250 0.025
9 0.500 0.050
10 1.000 0.100
11 2.500 0.250 has been assumed in Calculation
12
ANALYSIS OF SLOPE STABILITY ACCORDING TO THE THEORY OF LIMIT
STATES / FACTOR OF SAFETY
The verification analysis can be carried out according to the theory of limit states:
𝛾𝑆 𝑀𝑟𝑒𝑠 > 𝑀𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟
where: Movr - overturning moment

γs - coefficient of overall stability of structure
Mres - resisting moment
Soil parameters (angle of internal friction, cohesion) are in this case reduced using the design coefficients
introduced in the frame "Settings". The value of utilization Vu is calculated and then compared with the value of
100%. The value of utilization is given by:
1
𝑉𝑢 = <1
𝐹𝑆𝛾𝑠
where: FS - factor of slope stability computed with reduced soil parameters

γs - coefficient of overall stability of structure
The second option offers the verification analysis using the factor of safety:
𝑀𝑟𝑒𝑠
𝐹𝑆 = < 𝑆𝐵
𝑀𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟
where: Movr - overturning moment

Mres - resisting moment
SB - factor of safety for overturning
FS - factor of safety for overturning
7
SHARMA METHOD OF IDENTIFICATION OF FAILURE PLANE
The Sarma method falls within a category of general sliced methods of limit states. It is based on
fulfilling the force and moment equilibrium conditions on individual slices. The slices are created by
dividing the soil region above the potential slip surface by planes, which may in general experience a
different inclination. Forces acting on individual slices are displayed in figure.
Here, Ei, Xi represent the normal and shear forces between slices. Ni, Ti are normal and shear forces on segments
of a slip surface. Wi is the slice weight and k.Wi is the horizontal force that is used to achieve in the Sarma method
the limit state. Generally inclined surcharge can be introduced in each block. This surcharge is included in the analysis
together with the surcharge due to water having the free water table above the terrain, and with forces in anchors. All
these forces are projected along the horizontal and vertical directions, which are then summed up into components
Fxi and Fyi. k is a constant named the factor of horizontal acceleration and it is introduced into the analysis in order
to satisfy the equilibrium on individual slices. There is a relationship between k and the factor of slope stability
FS allowing for the safety factor computation. In ordinary cases the analysis proceeds with the value of k equal to
zero. A non-zero value of k is used to simulate the horizontal surcharge, e.g. due to earthquake (see below).
Analysis process
Computation of limit equilibrium
The computation of limit equilibrium requires the solution of 6n-1 unknowns, where n stands for the number of slices
dividing the soil region above the potential slip surface. These are:
E - forces developed between slices

N - normal forces acting on slip surface
T - shear forces acting on a slip surface
X - shear forces developed between slices
z - locations of points of applications of forces
li - locations of points of applications of forces
8
k - factor of horizontal acceleration
The Spencer method is a general method of slices developed on the basis of limit equilibrium. It requires satisfying
equilibrium of forces and moments acting on individual slices. The slices are created by dividing the soil above the
slip surface by planes, which in general may have different inclinations. Forces acting on individual slices are
displayed in figure.
Each slice assumes contribution due to the following forces:

slice weight, including surcharge having the character of weight including the influence of the coefficient
Wi -
of vertical earthquake
horizontal inertia force representing the effect of earthquake, k is the factor of horizontal acceleration
k.Wi -
during earthquake
Ni - normal force on the slip surface
Ti - shear force on the slip surface
Ei
- forces exerted by neighboring slices, they are inclined from horizontal plane by angle δ
,Ei+1
Fxi
- other horizontal and vertical forces acting on slice
Fyii
Mli - moment of forces Fxi ,Fyi rotating about point M, which is the center of the i–th segment of slip surface
Ui - pore pressure resultant on the i–th segment of slip surface
The following assumptions are introduced in the Spencer method to calculate the limit equilibrium of forces and
moment on individual slices:
 dividing planes between slices are always vertical
 the line of action of weight of slice Wi passes through the centre of the i–th segment of slip surface
represented by point M
 the normal force Ni is acting in the center of the i–th segment of slip surface, at point
 inclination of forces Ei acting between blocks is constant for all slices and equals to δ, only at slip surface
end points is δ=0
The solution adopts the following expressions:
9
Equation (1) represents the relationship between effective and total value of the normal force acting on the slip
surface. Equation (2) corresponds to the Mohr-Coulomb condition representing the relation between the normal and
shear forces on a given segment of the slip surface. Equation (3) represents the force equation of equilibrium in the
direction normal to the i–th segment of the slip surface, whereas Equation (4) represents equilibrium along the i–th
segment of the slip surface. FS is the factor of safety, which is used to reduce the soil parameters. Equation (5)
corresponds to the moment equation of equilibrium about point M, where yG is the vertical coordinate of the point of
application of the weight of slice and yM is the vertical coordinate of point M. Modifying equations (3) and (4) provides
the following recursion formula:
This formula allows us to calculate for given values of δ and FS all forces acting between blocks. This solution
assumes that at the slip surface origin the value of E is known equal to E1=0.
Additional recursion formula follows from the moment equation of equilibrium (5) as:
10
This formula allows us to calculate for a given value of all arms z of forces acting between blocks, knowing the value
on the left at the slip surface origin, where z1=0.
The factor of safety FS is determined by employing the following iteration process:
1. The initial value of δ is set to zero δ = 0.

2. The factor of safety FS for a given value of δ follows from Equation (6), while assuming the value of En+1 = 0
at the end of the slip surface.
3. The value of δ is provided by equation (7) using the values of E determined in the previous step with the
requirement of having the moment on the last slice equal to zero. Equation (7) does not provide the value of
zn+1 as it is equal to zero. For this value the moment equation of equilibrium (5) must be satisfied.
4. Steps 2 and 3 are then repeated until the value of δ does not change.
Influence of water is introduced in the program with the help of stream pressure instead of pore pressure. The way of
introducing water in the analysis is described hereafter:
For the process of iteration to be stable it is necessary to avoid instable solutions. Such instabilities occur at points
where division by zero in expressions (6) and (7) takes place. In equation (7), division by zero is encountered for δ =
π/2 or δ = -π/2. Therefore, the value of angle δ must be found in the interval (-π/2;π/2).
Division by zero in expression (6) appears when:
Therefore, the value of FSmax being the maximal value of FS satisfying equation (8) is found first. The iteration then
starts from the value of FS “just” right from FSmax and all values of FS entering the iteration process are larger than
FSmax.
OPTIMIZATION OF POLYGONAL SLIP SURFACE

The slip surface optimization proceeds such that the program changes subsequently locations of individual points of
this surface and checks, which change of location of a given point results in the maximal reduction of the factor of
slope stability FS. The end points of the optimized slip surface are moved on the ground surface, internal points are
moved in the vertical and horizontal directions. The step size is initially selected as one tenth of the smallest distance
of neighboring points along the slip surface. With every new run the step size is reduced by one half. Location of
points of slip surface is optimized subsequently from the left to the right and it is completed when there was no point
moved in the last run.
When optimizing the polygonal slip surface, the iteration process may suffer from falling into the local minimum (with
respect to gradual evolution of locations of nodal points) so not always the process is terminated by locating the
critical slip surface. Especially in case of complex slope profile it is therefore advantageous to introduce several
locations of the initial slip surface. Combination with the approach used for circular slip surfaces is also recommended.
Therefore, the critical slip surface assuming circular shape is found first and the result is then used to define the initial
polygonal slip surface.
The optimization process can be restricted by various constraints. This becomes advantageous especially if we wish
the searched slip to pass through a certain region or to bypass this region. The restriction on optimization process
can be performed in two different ways:
11
1. Optimization constrains are specified as a set of segments in a soil body. The optimized slip surface is then
forced to bypass these segments during optimization.
2. Another way of constraining the optimization process is to fix location of selected points along the optimized
slip surface or allow for moving these point only in one of two directions, either vertically or horizontally.
CHANGING INCLINATION OF DIVIDING PLANES

It is evident from figure that the planes dividing individual slices do not have to be vertical and not even mutually
parallel. In the first stage of analysis when the optimization procedure moves points along the slip surface assumes
vertical alignment of dividing planes. To arrive at even smaller value of the slope stability it is possible to change the
mutual alignment of dividing planes. This process is again performed in several runs with limited value of rotation
step and this step is again reduced in the course of optimization. This stage of optimization is terminated once the
rotation step drops below the value of 1o and no change of rotation occurred during the last optimization run.
FOLIATION
Soils can be introduced with foliation. It means that along an angle specified in terms of a certain interval, which in
turn is introduced as one of the soil parameters <Starting Slope; End Slope> the soil experiences significantly different
(usually worth) parameters (c a φ).
If the slope of a slip surface segment or the slope of interface between blocks is assumed within the interval <Starting
Slope; End Slope>, the analysis proceeds with the modified parameters of c and φ.
FELLENIUS / PETTERSON
The simplest method of slices assumes only the overall moment equation of equilibrium written with respect to the
center of the slip surface. The shear and normal forces between slices Xi and Ei are neglected. The factor of safety
FS follows directly from the following expression:
where: ui - pore pressure within slice

ci, φi - effective values of soil parameters
Wi - slice weight
Ni - normal force on the segment of slip surface
αi - inclination of the segment of slip surface
li - length of the segment of slip surface
BISHOP
The simplified Bishop assumes zero forces between slices Xi. The method is based on satisfying the moment equation
of equilibrium and the vertical force equation of equilibrium.
The factor of safety FS is found through a successive iteration of the following expression:
12
where: ui - pore pressure within slice
ci, φi - effective values of soil parameters
Wi - slice weight
αi - inclination of the segment of slip surface
li - length of the segment of slip surface
SPENCER
This method assumes non-zero forces between slices. The resultants of shear and normal forces acting between
slices have constant inclinations. The Spencer method is a rigorous method in a sense that it satisfies all three
equations of equilibrium – the force equations of equilibrium in the horizontal and vertical directions and the moment
equation of equilibrium. The factor of safety FS is found through the iteration of inclination of forces acting between
slices and the factor of safety FS. Further details can be found in section describing the analysis of polygonal slip
surface.
OPTIMIZATION OF CIRCULAR SLIP SURFACE

The goal of the optimization process is to locate a slip surface with the smallest factor of slope stability FS. The
circular slip surface is specified in terms of 3 points: two points on the ground surface and one inside the soil body.
Each point on the surface has one degree of freedom while the internal point has two degrees of freedom. The slip
surface is defined in terms of four independent parameters. Searching for such a set of parameters that yields the
most critical results requires sensitivity analysis resulting in a matrix of changes of parameters that allows for fast and
reliable optimization procedure. The slip surface that gives the smallest factor of slope stability is taken as the critical
one.
This approach usually succeeds in finding the critical slip surface without encountering the problem of falling into a
local minimum during iteration. It therefore appears as a suitable starting point when optimizing general slip surfaces
such as the polygonal slip surface.
The optimization process can be restricted by various constraints. This becomes advantageous especially if we wish
the searched slip surface to pass through a certain region or to bypass this region. Optimization constrains are
specified as a set of segments in a soil body. The optimized slip surface is then forced to bypass these segments
during optimization.
INFLUENCE OF TENSILE CRACKS

The program makes possible to account for the influence of tensile that appear on terrain surface and are filled with
water h. The only input parameter is the depth of tensile cracks. The effect of cracks is incorporated when calculating
normal and shear forces in sections of a slip surface containing cracks – in a section with tensile cracks the shear
strength parameters are set to zero (c = 0, φ = 0). Next, a horizontal force F due to presence water in a tensile crack
is introduced in the analysis (see figure):
13
REMEDIAL MEASURES OF SLOPE STABILITY
INTRODUCTION
For long-term slope stability, there are several techniques/methods such as construction of retaining walls (cantilever
type, gravity type, and earth reinforced type), protect surface by rock (soil) nail and shotcrete, regrading (reducing) of
slopes, construct avalanche shed over roads, use of anchored sheet pile or bored pile wall for deep seated slides,
vegetation or bioengineering, make proper drainage system, and other slope stabilization (physical or chemical)
methods etc. However, the recommendation of protection system & design for slope stability will be defined after
analyzing the soil type and its mechanical properties and actual modelling of the topography in 2D/3D software to
identify the failure pattern with or without ground water, static and in dynamic condition. After identifying the failure
pattern, the most suitable and nearest appropriate remedial measures or techniques/methods for long-term slope
stability in future can be recommended.
MODIFICATION/CHANGE OF SLOPE GEOMETRY

1. Removing material from area driving the landslide (with possible substitution by lightweight fill)
2. Adding material to area maintaining stability (counterweight berm or fill)
3. Reducing general slope angle
CONTROL OF SURFACE WATER [DRAINAGE]
1. Surface drains to divert water from flowing onto slide area (collecting ditches and pipes)
2. Shallow or deep trench drains filled with free-draining Geo-membrane materials (coarse granular fills and
Geosynthetics)
3. Buttress counterforts of coarse-grained materials (hydrological effect)
4. Vertical (small-diameter) boreholes, pumped or self-draining
5. Vertical (large-diameter) wells with gravity draining
6. Sub-horizontal or sub-vertical boreholes
7. Drainage tunnels, galleries or adits
8. Vacuum dewatering
9. Drainage by siphoning
10. Electro-osmotic dewatering
11. Vegetation planting (hydrological effect)
RETAINING STRUCTURES
1. Gravity-retaining walls
2. Crib-block walls
3. Gabion walls
4. Passive piles, piers and caissons
14
5. Cast-in-situ reinforced concrete walls
6. Reinforced earth-retaining structures with Geo-strip/sheet- polymer/Geo- reinforcement elements
7. Buttress counterforts of coarse-grained material (mechanical effect)
8. Retention nets for rock slope faces
9. Rock fall attenuation or stopping systems (rock trap ditches, benches, fences and walls)
10. Protective rock/concrete blocks against erosion
11. RCC bored Anchor Piles. This has been considered in all of the six Section for Slope stability measures
provided beneath the footings.
INTERNAL SLOPE REINFORCEMENT TO INCREASE THE INTERNAL FRICTION AND

LENGTH OF FAILURE PLANE FOR STABILITY
1. Rock bolts
2. Micropiles
3. Soil nailing
4. Soil Anchors. This has been considered as an option in the last Section for Slope stability measures
as an option.
5. Grouting
6. Stone or lime/cement columns
7. Heat treatment
8. Freezing
9. Electro-osmotic anchors
10. Vegetation planting (root strength mechanical effect)
The details of the inputs of Seven critical sections for calculation of slope failure plane, their corresponding details of the
outputs and corresponding remedial measures has been attached in the Annexure -1 of this report.
15
OUTPUT SUMMARY OF THE CRITICAL SEVEN SECTIONS
The output of the analysis of each of the critical sections namely, Section 1-1, 2-2, 3-3, 4-4, 5-5, 6-6 and 8-8 has been
done in five different stages of construction. Namely
1. The output of the critical failure slope on existing condition without any earthquake and building surcharge
effect in consideration.
2. The output of the critical failure slope on existing condition using Earthquake effect in order find out the slope
vulnerability under major seismic event.
3. The output of the critical failure slope under the building surcharge load with applying the restriction to identify
the critical failure slip plane starting beneath the footing surcharge and end up to the base of the slope.
4. The output of critical failure slope with earthquake effect under the building surcharge load with applying the
restriction to identify the critical failure slip plane starting beneath the footing surcharge and end up to the
base of the slope and
5. The last one is the output of the possible remedial measures implemented in order to prevent the slope failure
occurring beneath the footing level up to the base of slope.
SUMMARY OF THE OUTPUT OF THE SLOPE STABILTY ANALYSIS FOR EXISTING CONDITION
Slope Stability Analysis in Static Existing Condition Slope Stability Analysis in Earthquake Existing Condition
Section
Circular Slip Surface Circular Slip Surface
No
Bishop method Fellenius /Petterson Spencer Bishop method Fellenius /Petterson Spencer
1-1 1.220 1.160 1.220 0.750 0.820 0.740
2-2 1.080 1.030 1.080 0.740 0.720 0.780
3-3 1.180 1.120 1.180 0.940 1.000 0.980
4-4 1.200 1.110 1.200 0.740 0.730 0.580
5-5 1.270 1.160 1.270 0.750 0.770 0.620
6-6 1.240 1.160 1.240 0.880 0.900 0.850
8-8 1.240 1160 1.240 0.780 0.820 0.680
SUMMARY OF THE OUTPUT OF THE SLOPE STABILTY ANALYSIS CONSIDERING BUILDING SURCHARGE
Slope Stability Analysis in Static Slope Stability Analysis in Earthquake
Existing Condition Existing Condition
Section
Circular Slip Surface Remarks
No
Bishop Fellenius Bishop Fellenius Spencer
Spencer
method /Petterson method /Petterson method
2-2 1.900 1.880 1.920 1.050 1.090 ----- Ø600mm-20m long
3-3 1.720 1.720 1.730 0.940 1.000 -----
SUMMARY OF THE OUTPUT OF THE SLOPE STABILTY ANALYSIS CONSIDERING BUILDING SURCHARGE
Static Existing Earthquake Existing EQ condition with Anchor
Condition Condition Piles of Ø600mm RCC
Section bored Piles
Remarks
No Polygonal Slip Surface running beneath Footing up to base slope
Sarma Spencer Sarma Spencer Spencer
Sarma method
method method method method method
3-3 ----- ------ 0.790 0.730 1.690 ------ Ø600mm-20m long
4-4 1.520 ----- 0.810 ------ 2.390 ----- Ø600mm-20m long
5-5 1.490 1.480 0.870 ------ 2.400 ----- Ø600mm-20m long
6-6 1.370 1.350 1.350 1.350 1.690 2.550 Ø600mm-20m long
8-8 1.350 1.330 0.850 0.610 1.910 1.590 Soil Anchors @ 2m c/c bothways
8.8 1.610 1.510 Ø600mm-20m long
For Section 8-8, Optional technique of Soil anchors has been investigated against Anchor Piles for reference.
16
DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDATION FROM THE SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS
After analyzing the output of slope stability analysis done for critical seven sections on five different conditions, the outcomes of
the slope stability analysis are the factor of safety of the slip surface considered under the five different conditions which has
been elaborately mentioned on the output summary of the critical seven sections.
The standard user procedure for any slope to be acceptable is if the factor of safety [FOS] came out to be equal or greater than
1.50 it implies that the resisting forces [ which in general existing soil condition is gravity loads] is 1.5 times greater than the
sliding forces on the considered section analysis. If any slip failure defined or optimization calculation shows the FOS value
greater than 1.5, that particular slip plane is considered to be acceptable in the stages of conditions which has been mentioned
in previous section. If FOS of any Slope analysis came out to be less than 1.5, it is considered to be unacceptable for any time
of further construction usage of that particular slope.
Similarly, if the FOS came less than 1.0, it clearly implies that the resisting force is less than sliding forces considered for the
particular slip surface. If the slip surface has been calculated in iterative algorithm for optimized result to calculate FOS under
above mentioned stages and FOS came less than 1.0, then that particular section slope is considered to be unstable and
vulnerable to collapse in the slip failure plane calculated under that stage conditions.
Based on above concepts of evaluation, the slope failure envelope of the failure plane assessed with various methods in all
seven section for all five stages of construction has been prepared and shown on the site plan. The Slope vulnerability map has
covered almost more than 70% of column footings of the upcoming Kanti Bal Hospital block at the located site plan. It clearly
indicated that all the footing where the FOS is less than 1.5, needs to provide some sort of anchor system which not only makes
the slope stable but also makes the load transfer mechanism of the footing loads to the stable soil layers beneath the critical
slip surface.
Based on this concept, the anchor piles have been introduced with sufficient length and diameters in all seven critical section to
evaluate the FOS of the slip failure plane FOS greater than acceptable criteria [which is FOS=1.5]. The comparison table of
outputs in previous section has clearly mentioned the possible remedial measures in order to protect the upcoming building. It
shows that enough numbers of RCC bored piles of Ø600mm and length not smaller than 20m needs to be put beneath each of
the footings in contact of failure envelope so that the load can be transferred to the stable soil layers.
An alternative option to the anchor pile concept has also been provided in the last section analysis. In this case, entire area of
the vulnerable zone of the slope needs to be anchored with soil anchors with 25m length of anchor @ inclination of 30° to
horizon at spacing of 2m c/c both ways having pull strength of 200KN [20 tons]. By providing the soil anchor on the entire zones
shown in the vulnerable map, the slope can be stable under all five conditions and then no anchor piles need to be installed
beneath the footings.
Furthermore, those footings which are not in contact of the Failure envelope and considering similar foundation types of Pile
Foundation to all of the rest of Six footings, Ø600mm-10m long with one number has been provided to match same type of
founation and settlement criteria.
17
ANNEXURE-1
 SITE SURVEY DATA
 SURCHARGE LOADS FROM THE UPCOMING ADDITIONAL BLOCKS OF
KANTI BAL HOSPITAL
 CALCULATION INPUT & OUTPUT SUMMARY OF THE SLOPE STAILITY
ANALYSIS
18
ANNEXURE-2
DESIGN DRAWINGS OF THE SLOPE STAILITY ANALYSIS
19
S. No Northing Easting Elevation Description S. No Northing Easting Elevation Description
1 3068986.015 335112.412 1348 TP1 477 3068994.089 335059.021 1327.532 SH
3 3068965.876 335116.867 1348.355 TP2 478 3068996.355 335056.049 1325.436 TREE
5 3068990.962 335099.678 1342.017 BM1 479 3068992.757 335062.006 1327.513 SH
6 3068984.4 335110.084 1348.377 WALL 480 3069000.151 335066.449 1327.849 WALL
7 3068984.554 335109.905 1348.304 WALL 481 3069000.741 335066.18 1327.69 WALL
8 3068984.355 335110.157 1347.96 SH 482 3068990.239 335059.102 1327.711 SH
9 3068984.569 335109.82 1347.622 WALL B 483 3068998.326 335060.62 1325.992 SH
10 3068986.919 335111.889 1348.404 WALL 484 3068997.48 335063.566 1327.111 SH
11 3068987.117 335111.662 1348.402 WALL 485 3068992.551 335062.851 1329.882 SH
12 3068986.89 335111.923 1347.946 SH 486 3068989.574 335060.425 1329.742 SH
13 3068987.321 335111.551 1346.656 WALL B 487 3068986.936 335054.428 1327.987 SH
14 3068989.367 335113.672 1348.235 WALL 489 3069014.28 335041.794 1324.521 HC
15 3068989.406 335113.404 1348.276 WALL 490 3069014.38 335041.874 1324.514 DRN
16 3068989.389 335113.67 1347.732 SH 491 3069014.627 335042.066 1324.422 DRN
17 3068989.714 335113.171 1346.569 WALL B 492 3069002.8 335065.967 1325.882 HC
18 3068942.395 335083.264 1347.367 TP3 493 3069018.342 335044.996 1325.156 HC
19 3068993.64 335116.532 1347.702 SH 494 3069002.111 335066.133 1325.427 DRN
20 3068993.849 335116.131 1346.318 WALL B 495 3069001.885 335066.068 1325.416 DRN
21 3068993.835 335116.272 1348.088 WALL 496 3069017.62 335044.777 1324.665 DRN
22 3068993.652 335116.504 1348.102 WALL 497 3069017.484 335044.648 1324.649 DRN
23 3068996.849 335118.751 1348.083 WALL 498 3069009.77 335071.07 1325.496 HC
24 3068997.033 335118.502 1348.054 WALL 499 3069009.271 335071.107 1325.503 DRN
25 3068996.863 335118.844 1347.313 SH 500 3069009.048 335071.502 1325.534 DRN
26 3068997.077 335118.444 1346.265 WALL B 501 3068998.173 335064.92 1327.816 WALL
27 3068972.335 335128.712 1348.02 HC 502 3068997.963 335064.768 1327.89 WALL
28 3069001.474 335121.485 1348.125 WALL 503 3068998.383 335064.365 1327.806 SLAB
29 3069001.53 335121.236 1348.091 WALL 504 3068998.456 335064.332 1327.133 SH
30 3069001.555 335121.161 1346.304 WALL B 505 3068996.021 335062.269 1327.892 SLAB
31 3069001.468 335121.533 1347.321 SH 506 3068996.58 335062.154 1327.077 SH
32 3068982.058 335131.879 1347.826 HC 507 3068997.211 335063.707 1327.912 TANK
33 3069007.664 335125.18 1348.087 WALL 508 3068996.507 335065.515 1327.919 TANK
34 3069007.798 335124.887 1348.06 WALL 509 3068997.169 335066.205 1327.987 SLAB
35 3069007.503 335125.201 1347.572 SH 510 3069008.125 335074.763 1328.597 WALL
36 3069007.836 335124.61 1346.467 WALL B 511 3069007.697 335074.913 1328.596 WALL
37 3068991.299 335130.034 1347.648 HC 1 512 3069007.995 335074.374 1328.105 SH
38 3068998.854 335132.317 1347.934 HC 1 513 3069009.838 335073.179 1328.462 WALL
39 3068998.377 335130.411 1347.589 SP TANK 514 3069009.734 335072.641 1328.457 WALL
40 3069005.79 335128.98 1347.05 WALL 515 3069010.614 335071.511 1328.417 WALL
41 3068998.906 335129.151 1347.603 SP TANK 516 3069010.883 335071.718 1328.412 WALL
42 3068999.745 335124 1347.237 SH 517 3068996.986 335066.281 1328.846 WALL
43 3069001.976 335132.071 1347.768 SP TANK 518 3069011.269 335081.69 1328.861 RE
44 3068997.424 335122.189 1347.07 SH 519 3069010.548 335077.675 1328.386 RE
45 3069002.691 335135.131 1347.393 WALL 520 3069007.835 335077.141 1328.965 RE
46 3068995.379 335128.024 1347.468 SH 521 3069018.685 335075.121 1327.636 RE
47 3068993.13 335125.773 1347.377 SH 522 3069007.694 335081.994 1329.074 RE
48 3068992.825 335119.073 1348.025 SH 523 3069014.998 335072.809 1327.729 RE
49 3068989.869 335127.373 1347.458 SH 525 3068979.7 335046.438 1329.102 SH
Page 1 of 10
50 3068986.809 335132.151 1347.787 SH 526 3068977.536 335050.363 1329.698 SH
51 3068988.493 335126.594 1347.853 SH 527 3068976.162 335043.923 1329.659 SH
52 3068989.097 335116.974 1347.898 SH 528 3068972.773 335043.612 1330.868 SH
53 3068982.479 335128.238 1347.626 SH 529 3068974.066 335045.848 1329.559 SH
54 3068988.469 335121.646 1347.908 SH 530 3068975.086 335041.434 1329.657 SH
55 3068983.654 335126.239 1347.872 TREE 531 3068973.709 335046.916 1331.413 SH
56 3068985.776 335115.253 1347.908 SH 532 3068971.314 335037.964 1329.941 SH
57 3068978.724 335111.481 1348.184 SH 533 3068975.287 335050.143 1331.433 SH
58 3068977.043 335126.307 1348.099 SH 534 3068977.374 335056.344 1333.182 SH
59 3068970.994 335107.143 1348.188 SH 535 3068972.075 335035.343 1329.302 SH
60 3068973.125 335124.756 1347.934 SH 536 3068970.298 335040.544 1332.289 SH
61 3068967.341 335099.327 1348.16 SH 537 3068967.761 335042.576 1334.146 TREE
62 3068965.447 335127.34 1348.06 SH 538 3068969.256 335031.613 1329.273 SH
63 3068967.101 335120.495 1348.053 SH 539 3068974.796 335035.293 1329.251 TREE
64 3068972.531 335118.169 1348.162 SH 540 3068967.011 335028.005 1329.585 SH
65 3068967.292 335113.719 1348.208 SH 541 3068972.115 335029.069 1328.552 SH
66 3068961.289 335092.924 1347.813 SH 542 3068964.33 335024.917 1330.923 SH
67 3068968.83 335109.583 1348.161 SH 543 3068963.632 335030.221 1331.872 SH
68 3068974.635 335113.217 1348.197 SH 544 3068966.25 335028.591 1330.516 SH
69 3068979.636 335118.113 1348.085 SH 545 3068961.558 335028.476 1332.029 SH
70 3068954.849 335087.507 1347.645 SH 546 3068960.263 335022.009 1331.143 SH
71 3068984.148 335121.141 1347.765 SH 547 3068958.897 335026.347 1331.447 SH
72 3068958.032 335095.542 1347.794 SH 548 3068956.426 335020.327 1331.366 SH
73 3068960.874 335100.112 1348.016 SH 549 3068951.463 335024.743 1331.955 SH
74 3068960.572 335132.447 1348.079 HC 2 550 3068951.138 335021.473 1330.891 SH
75 3068965.235 335106.368 1348.128 SH 551 3068962.001 335040.671 1336.465 SH
76 3068965.789 335111.528 1348.193 SH 552 3068948.746 335025.232 1332.449 SH
77 3068961.059 335119.688 1348.26 SH 553 3068948.529 335030.826 1336.358 SH
78 3068960.729 335124.592 1348.061 SH 554 3068952.617 335028.137 1333.337 SH
79 3068944.791 335127.796 1347.725 HC 2 555 3068951.597 335030.781 1336.552 SH
80 3068943.902 335126.992 1347.676 HC 556 3068974.755 335026.882 1325.929 SH
81 3068949.653 335128.797 1348.027 HC 557 3068957.014 335029.212 1333.867 SH
82 3068957.309 335116.839 1348.312 WALL 558 3068967.166 335018.943 1326.875 SH
83 3068956.84 335116.668 1348.2 WALL 559 3068960.868 335032.016 1333.928 SH
84 3068956.935 335119.385 1348.149 WALL 560 3068958.521 335034.454 1336.16 SH
85 3068952.674 335118.35 1348.376 HC 2WALL 561 3068956.974 335013.393 1325.951 SH
86 3068982.462 335108.134 1347.823 FT 562 3068955.556 335006.283 1323.356 SH
87 3068983.385 335108.864 1347.694 FT 563 3068963.167 335009.322 1323.478 SH
88 3068983.304 335107.442 1347.643 FT 564 3068972.708 335015.204 1324.059 SH
89 3068983.786 335108.103 1347.647 FT 565 3068976.68 335020.955 1324.527 SH
90 3068984.341 335107.807 1347.397 FT 566 3068978.998 335025.307 1324.563 SH
91 3068983.979 335107.005 1347.384 FT 567 3068959.899 335040.388 1337.468 SH
92 3068984.474 335106.692 1347.146 FT 568 3068964.849 335045.847 1337.109 SH
93 3068984.873 335107.463 1347.172 FT 569 3068970.262 335052.227 1335.705 SH
94 3068985.117 335106.367 1346.919 FT 570 3068949.292 335033.615 1338.069 SH
95 3068985.385 335107.183 1346.918 FT 571 3068948.946 335036.062 1339.059 SH
96 3068985.881 335107.02 1346.705 FT 572 3068986.864 335103.521 1346.643 GW
Page 2 of 10
97 3068985.765 335106.191 1346.713 FT 573 3068986.189 335103.916 1346.68 GW
98 3068986.563 335106.909 1346.482 FT 574 3068987.404 335103.339 1344.54 GW B
99 3068986.611 335106.153 1346.474 FT 575 3068982.848 335098.918 1346.854 GW
100 3068987.535 335107.171 1346.217 FT 576 3068982.118 335099.388 1346.881 GW
101 3068987.814 335106.338 1346.238 FT 577 3068983.329 335098.35 1344.431 GW B
102 3068990.441 335107.286 1345.664 FT 578 3068980.471 335094.878 1344.679 GW B
103 3068990.284 335108.205 1345.726 FT 579 3068980.257 335096.139 1347.081 GW
104 3068992.539 335108.983 1345.591 FT 580 3068979.815 335096.505 1347.395 GW
105 3068991.539 335107.423 1345.65 FT 581 3068976.096 335089.688 1344.845 GW B
106 3068991.724 335106.926 1344.967 FT 582 3068975.641 335090.348 1346.909 GW
107 3068991.778 335106.396 1344.763 FT 583 3068975.114 335091.189 1347.213 GW
108 3068992.551 335106.253 1344.724 FT 584 3068971.325 335085.13 1346.883 GW
109 3068991.664 335105.865 1344.52 FT 585 3068970.871 335085.627 1347.008 GW
110 3068992.546 335105.769 1344.491 FT 586 3068971.283 335084.246 1344.827 GW B
111 3068991.526 335105.359 1344.286 FT 587 3068968.995 335088.929 1347.727 SH
112 3068992.457 335105.26 1344.26 FT 588 3068971.967 335092.44 1347.805 SH
113 3068991.406 335104.942 1344.041 FT 589 3068974.264 335095.743 1347.92 SH
114 3068992.342 335104.85 1344.022 FT 590 3068976.91 335098.354 1348.165 SH
115 3068991.337 335104.434 1343.809 FT 591 3068978.868 335098.837 1347.77 SH
116 3068992.209 335104.358 1343.81 FT 592 3068982.009 335101.426 1347.372 SH
117 3068991.24 335104.039 1343.609 FT 1 593 3068984.634 335105.171 1346.791 SH
118 3068992.102 335103.866 1343.564 FT 1 595 3068954.444 335052.426 1339.224 GW
119 3068991.12 335103.539 1343.379 FT 596 3068954.405 335053.346 1339.216 GW
120 3068992.047 335103.475 1343.363 FT 597 3068954.262 335051.924 1338.108 GW B
121 3068990.983 335103.038 1343.162 FT 1 598 3068962.473 335049.044 1337.003 RE
122 3068991.872 335102.928 1343.131 FT 1 599 3068960.129 335052.587 1336.871 RE
123 3068990.894 335102.638 1342.933 FT 600 3068962.76 335055.623 1337.885 GW
124 3068991.822 335102.535 1342.922 FT 601 3068962.901 335054.894 1336.423 SH
125 3068990.809 335102.186 1342.733 FT 1 602 3068961.982 335056.101 1337.915 GW
126 3068991.709 335102.053 1342.699 FT 1 603 3068959.475 335053.679 1338.512 GW
127 3068991.608 335101.636 1342.488 FT 604 3068959.138 335054.265 1338.7 GW
128 3068990.712 335101.809 1342.51 FT 605 3068947.858 335044.806 1338.74 EP
129 3068990.146 335099.845 1342.01 FT 606 3068953.864 335050.462 1337.738 RE
130 3068990.937 335099.505 1341.982 FT 607 3068954.072 335046.745 1337.974 RE
131 3068990.631 335098.888 1341.768 FT 1 608 3068958.039 335047.1 1337.451 RE
132 3068990.664 335098.878 1341.785 FT 1 609 3068937.927 335058.118 1339.64 TP7
133 3068989.957 335099.194 1341.773 FT 1 610 3068957.439 335050.8 1337.298 RE
134 3068990.41 335098.311 1341.561 FT 611 3068953.666 335041.364 1338.281 SH
135 3068989.655 335098.632 1341.588 FT 612 3068956.792 335042.595 1338.233 SH
136 3068989.831 335097.14 1341.27 FT 1 613 3068948.014 335046.862 1338.51 RE
137 3068989.036 335097.467 1341.271 FT 1 614 3068947.781 335052.02 1338.582 RE
138 3068990.61 335106.559 1345.581 TP 615 3068948.392 335053.349 1338.594 SH
139 3068989.529 335109.896 1346.402 TREE 616 3068944.553 335048.249 1338.815 RE
140 3068992.885 335108.788 1345.524 TREE 617 3068945.715 335053.197 1338.834 RE
141 3068994.245 335113.033 1346.108 TREE 618 3068946.089 335054.186 1338.803 SH
142 3068996.158 335116.881 1346.05 WALL 619 3068943.197 335044.452 1338.876 SH
143 3068995.6 335116.453 1346.146 WALL 620 3068960.736 335044.208 1337.341 SH
Page 3 of 10
144 3068996.583 335116.57 1345.42 WALL B 621 3068941.921 335056.283 1339.169 RE
145 3068997.641 335114.309 1345.969 WALL 622 3068939.824 335053.545 1339.188 RE
146 3068996.624 335114.369 1346.036 WALL 623 3068938.677 335052.679 1339.33 SH
147 3068997.88 335114.231 1344.961 WALL B 624 3068964.715 335047.371 1337.002 SH
148 3068994.191 335110.275 1346.129 WALL 626 3068984.74 335037.073 1325.099 TOILET
149 3068993.675 335110.769 1346.216 WALL 627 3068983.839 335035.393 1325.12 HC
150 3068994.322 335110.145 1345.607 WALL B 628 3069007.713 335089.743 1332.57 PIPE
151 3068992.3 335109.118 1346.176 WALL 629 3068997.813 335067.251 1328.906 PIPE
152 3068991.923 335109.735 1346.272 WALL 630 3069002.373 335070.677 1328.825 PIPE
153 3068992.435 335108.972 1345.584 WALL B 631 3069009.496 335075.629 1328.649 PIPE
154 3068986.168 335107.909 1346.577 WALL 632 3069010.956 335074.034 1328.243 PIPE
155 3068985.953 335107.001 1346.504 WALL 633 3069009.137 335085.749 1329.918 PIPE
156 3068985.544 335109.569 1346.8 WALL 634 3069003.599 335068.824 1328.261 WALL
157 3068985.157 335109.744 1346.821 WALL 635 3069003.748 335068.498 1328.331 WALL
158 3068987.485 335110.95 1346.673 WALL 1 636 3069003.604 335068.866 1328.015 SH
159 3068990.134 335112.807 1346.578 WALL 1 637 3069002.38 335070.138 1328.014 SH
160 3068994.151 335115.573 1346.376 WALL 1 638 3069002.401 335070.469 1328.735 WALL
161 3068996.81 335114.402 1346.145 TP4 639 3069002.116 335070.523 1328.82 WALL
163 3068996.592 335116.741 1345.458 GW 640 3069001.452 335064.468 1327.094 STAIR
164 3068996.272 335117.149 1346.337 GW 641 3068999.647 335063.135 1327.062 STAIR
165 3068995.965 335117.621 1346.325 GW 642 3069001.123 335061.199 1326.651 STAIR
166 3069000.849 335116.162 1344.382 SH 643 3069002.983 335062.529 1326.673 STAIR
167 3069000.13 335119.589 1346.252 GW 644 3069004.039 335061.14 1326.142 STAIR
168 3069000.604 335119.156 1344.694 SH 645 3069002.144 335059.769 1326.156 STAIR
169 3068999.646 335120.056 1346.268 GW 646 3069003.209 335058.259 1325.624 STAIR
170 3069000.497 335119.2 1345.401 GW 647 3069005.085 335059.776 1325.628 STAIR
171 3069000.222 335119.58 1345.401 GW 648 3068994.975 335066.014 1331.098 PIPE
172 3069003.844 335118.259 1344.333 SH 649 3068991.016 335069.74 1332.192 PIPE
173 3069000.487 335118.638 1344.821 TREE 650 3068986.625 335073.793 1333.836 PIPE
174 3069008.304 335123.556 1344.787 SH 651 3068983.855 335077.094 1335.633 PIPE
175 3069007.847 335124.122 1346.336 GW 652 3068978.897 335081.235 1338.737 PIPE
176 3069008.291 335123.635 1345.389 GW 653 3068974.187 335085.521 1344.544 PIPE
177 3069008.104 335123.942 1345.449 GW 655 3068932.542 335057.015 1339.711 SH
178 3069009.108 335121.821 1343.564 WALL 656 3068935.217 335060.074 1339.888 RE
179 3069010.798 335119.418 1342.511 WALL 657 3068942.799 335056.993 1339.149 SH
180 3069001.839 335115.231 1343.436 SH 658 3068938.456 335061.576 1339.895 RE
181 3069006.395 335116.667 1342.736 SH 659 3068940.212 335062.571 1340.291 SH
182 3069003.308 335113.347 1342.05 SH 660 3068929.762 335069.936 1340.753 RE
183 3069007.145 335115.37 1341.645 SH 661 3068932.68 335072.21 1340.713 RE
184 3069004.873 335111.362 1341.03 SH 662 3068926.061 335068.903 1340.53 SH
185 3069008.408 335113.48 1339.855 SH 663 3068933.496 335072.866 1341.025 SH
186 3069010.3 335111.564 1338.241 SH 664 3068923.9 335078.527 1341.207 RE
187 3069007.388 335109.172 1338.89 SH 665 3068926.915 335080.155 1341.279 RE
188 3069011.992 335108.975 1336.66 SH 666 3068921.65 335077.386 1341.167 SH
189 3069010.164 335105.392 1336.506 SH 667 3068927.402 335080.664 1341.432 SH
190 3069014.759 335106.646 1335.713 SH 668 3068921.844 335089.942 1342.254 RE
191 3069012.002 335102.456 1334.823 SH 669 3068919.523 335088.977 1342.323 RE
Page 4 of 10
192 3069016.2 335103.872 1334.704 SH 670 3068917.74 335088.413 1342.427 SH
193 3069017.985 335101.559 1333.739 SH 671 3068923.017 335089.243 1342.509 EP
194 3069014.149 335100.574 1333.063 SH 672 3068916.374 335088.05 1342.319 DRN
195 3069015.964 335098.75 1332.744 SH 673 3068915.705 335087.723 1342.355 DRN
196 3069020.414 335099.159 1332.466 SH 674 3068916.245 335088.038 1341.515 CL
197 3069014.738 335112.718 1338.472 WALL 675 3068914.086 335100.27 1343.873 RE
198 3069017.363 335096.14 1332.003 SH 676 3068911.647 335099.203 1344.489 DRN
199 3069022.729 335095.285 1331.459 SH 677 3068912.245 335099.812 1344.399 DRN
200 3069019.081 335093.068 1331.224 SH 678 3068915.196 335104.781 1344.017 RE
201 3069024.511 335091.839 1330.389 SH 679 3068917.419 335091.683 1343.068 TP09
202 3069016.79 335109.558 1336.367 WALL 680 3068937.926 335058.119 1339.632 TP08
203 3069021.255 335089.329 1329.975 SH 681 3068925.073 335063.726 1338.528 DRN
204 3069026.055 335090.037 1329.276 SH 682 3068923.933 335063.183 1338.72 DRN
205 3069018.668 335106.046 1334.957 WALL 683 3068924.611 335063.545 1337.993 CL
206 3069027.54 335086.862 1327.306 SH 684 3068927.472 335057.7 1337.36 DRN
207 3069021.635 335087.545 1328.201 SH 685 3068927.634 335057.201 1337.357 DRN
208 3069027.277 335087.062 1327.051 SH 686 3068925.766 335057.659 1337.395 DRN
209 3069037.877 335078.107 1326.99 WALL 687 3068925.316 335057.351 1337.39 DRN
210 3069023.477 335085.931 1327.073 HC 688 3068926.097 335057.725 1336.582 HP T
211 3069035.591 335081.376 1327.918 WALL 689 3068926.174 335057.874 1335.971 HP B
212 3069018.187 335082.161 1326.589 HC 690 3068925.645 335059.419 1337.584 DRN
213 3069030.669 335088.168 1327.925 WALL 691 3068925.16 335059.277 1337.498 DRN
214 3069015.65 335084.219 1329.332 SH 692 3068927.89 335059.659 1337.347 DRN
215 3069022.795 335099.423 1332.359 WALL 693 3068927.379 335061.694 1337.44 DRN
216 3069028.192 335091.789 1329.013 WALL 694 3068924.829 335061.609 1337.786 DRN
217 3069014.089 335088.246 1330.14 SH 695 3068925.329 335061.628 1337.822 DRN
218 3069024.994 335096.164 1330.773 WALL 696 3068924.765 335061.5 1337.784 DRN
219 3069009.819 335088.433 1331.871 SH 697 3068914.441 335109.008 1344.603 RE
220 3069010.205 335087.818 1331.242 SH 698 3068910.855 335108.267 1344.648 RE
221 3069008.066 335090.613 1332.786 HC 699 3068922.409 335097.611 1343.723 SH
222 3069007.98 335091.433 1332.5 TP 700 3068919.879 335103.35 1343.966 SH
223 3069007.727 335094.154 1332.209 SH 701 3068907.524 335118.368 1345.412 RE
224 3069004.173 335084.79 1331.749 SH 702 3068911.415 335118.861 1345.468 RE
225 3069005.913 335094.258 1333.214 HC 703 3068916.912 335105.35 1344.889 WALL
226 3068998.176 335092.185 1335.851 SH 707 3069003.783 335088.678 1333.123 HC
227 3069012.885 335090.794 1332.172 SH 708 3069025.466 335064.699 1325.971 RE
228 3069011.514 335095.351 1332.157 SH 709 3069022.308 335061.997 1325.896 RE
229 3069004.289 335095.127 1334.072 SH 710 3069030.113 335050.906 1324.675 RE
230 3068993.235 335093.589 1338.128 SH 711 3069031.586 335051.696 1324.64 RE
231 3068996.223 335097.769 1339.352 SH 712 3069023.694 335060.551 1325.887 PIPE
232 3069002.89 335097.183 1335.592 SH 713 3069019.415 335066.136 1326.746 PIPE
233 3069010.052 335097.201 1332.873 SH 714 3068991.904 335109.669 1346.294 BM3
234 3068994.204 335096.813 1339.282 SH 715 3069014.008 335072.424 1327.627 PIPE
235 3068993.832 335100.111 1340.603 SH 716 3068981.976 335105.218 1347.754 SH
236 3069007.931 335099.488 1335.296 SH 717 3068977.569 335100.61 1348.159 SH
237 3069002.24 335098.695 1336.676 SH 718 3068975.544 335097.72 1348.164 SH
238 3068995.018 335103.087 1341.696 SH 719 3068973.248 335095.412 1348.07 SH
Page 5 of 10
239 3069006.126 335101.988 1336.383 SH 720 3068971.071 335098.739 1348.315 SH
240 3068999.643 335101.457 1338.586 SH 721 3068974.051 335101.852 1348.177 SH
241 3068994.841 335108.351 1344.597 SH 722 3068976.378 335104.875 1347.963 SH
242 3069003.946 335103.516 1337.73 SH 723 3068978.705 335107.302 1348.012 SH
243 3068997.646 335102.746 1340.236 SH 724 3068946.289 335083.509 1347.454 TP10
244 3068997.134 335110.99 1344.43 SH 726 3068955.005 335087.478 1347.612 FT
245 3068999.311 335112.38 1343.61 SH 727 3068955.358 335086.31 1347.603 FT
246 3069000.091 335109.401 1341.715 SH 728 3068957.236 335084.187 1347.242 HUT
247 3068997.911 335106.646 1341.873 TREE 729 3068945.217 335084.565 1347.406 FT
249 3069000.379 335040.043 1325.139 BM2 730 3068945.382 335083.371 1347.402 FT
250 3068989.567 335096.372 1341.08 FT 731 3068942.472 335084.463 1347.363 FT
251 3068988.657 335096.632 1341.057 FT 732 3068942.345 335083.172 1347.351 FT
252 3068989.208 335095.384 1340.857 FT 1 733 3068942.339 335083.078 1347.358 FT
253 3068988.385 335095.763 1340.872 FT 1 734 3068951.24 335081.088 1347.342 HUT
254 3068988.881 335094.697 1340.635 FT 735 3068939.468 335087.013 1347.371 FT
255 3068988.078 335094.879 1340.636 FT 736 3068938.405 335086.338 1347.36 FT
256 3068987.812 335094.088 1340.405 FT 1 737 3068935.553 335094.689 1347.434 FT
257 3068988.649 335093.929 1340.428 FT 1 738 3068934.291 335094.281 1347.402 FT
258 3068987.718 335093.375 1340.178 FT 739 3068944.204 335087.402 1347.359 HUT
259 3068988.582 335093.312 1340.21 FT 740 3068947.22 335088.427 1347.431 HUT
260 3068987.717 335092.668 1339.929 FT 1 741 3068951.55 335088.564 1347.286 SH
261 3068988.525 335092.584 1339.988 FT 1 742 3068945.508 335092.698 1347.399 HUT
262 3068988.503 335092.024 1339.801 FT 743 3068953.783 335088.354 1347.621 WALL
263 3068987.673 335092.092 1339.766 FT 744 3068954.024 335088.131 1347.58 WALL
264 3068987.683 335091.391 1339.539 FT 1 745 3068949.747 335086.811 1347.654 WALL
265 3068988.459 335091.237 1339.562 FT 1 746 3068949.724 335087.075 1347.649 WALL
266 3068987.543 335090.792 1339.346 FT 747 3068930.994 335091.719 1347.427 SH
267 3068988.352 335090.527 1339.371 FT 748 3068934.387 335088.642 1347.345 POL
268 3068988.273 335089.964 1339.137 FT 1 749 3068933.104 335086.957 1347.002 SH
269 3068987.409 335090.216 1339.085 FT 1 750 3068938.114 335084.316 1347.062 SH
270 3068988.167 335089.448 1338.93 FT 751 3068936.52 335082.758 1347.247 SH
271 3068987.171 335088.919 1338.699 FT 752 3068930.845 335095.255 1347.236 TP11
272 3068987.344 335082.826 1336.675 FT 753 3068944.682 335079.831 1346.98 SH
273 3068986.509 335083.2 1336.691 FT 754 3068939.886 335081.518 1347.024 POL
274 3068986.125 335080.286 1336.048 FT 755 3068947.846 335079.032 1347.215 SH
275 3068985.031 335080.492 1335.999 FT 756 3068939.012 335080.578 1347.461 SH
276 3068986.757 335084.104 1336.973 FT 757 3068952.146 335078.942 1347.195 HUT
277 3068987.669 335083.966 1336.984 FT 758 3068952.537 335076.453 1347.366 SH
278 3068983.075 335077.013 1335.887 FT 759 3068949.988 335074.353 1346.836 SH
279 3068983.774 335076.862 1335.888 FT 760 3068951.91 335070.042 1346.909 SH
280 3068982.427 335073.131 1333.891 FT 761 3068948.171 335071.228 1346.609 SH
281 3068983.371 335073.112 1333.925 FT 762 3068962.982 335084.657 1346.803 SH
282 3068983.429 335072.17 1333.347 FT 763 3068954.283 335093.034 1347.821 SH
283 3068982.294 335072.03 1333.206 FT 764 3068956.557 335090.652 1347.641 SH
284 3068983.877 335071.465 1332.945 FT 765 3068942.834 335076.006 1347.078 SH
285 3068983.233 335070.952 1332.935 FT 766 3068942.803 335076.134 1347.07 SH
286 3068986.655 335072.473 1332.718 EP 767 3068941.805 335074.757 1346.593 SH
Page 6 of 10
287 3069005.117 335082.513 1329.757 RE 768 3068940.28 335079.995 1347.102 SH
287 3069004.99 335082.036 1329.757 RE 769 3068938.639 335077.983 1346.931 SH
288 3069006.804 335076.686 1329.169 RE 770 3068936.642 335082.387 1347.292 SH
289 3069004.655 335082.579 1331.804 GW 771 3068935.345 335081.387 1346.506 TREE
290 3069004.044 335083.47 1331.812 GW 772 3068932.738 335087.142 1346.938 SH
291 3069007.753 335075.549 1329.184 WALL 774 3068929.781 335092.002 1347.011 SH
292 3069007.542 335075.454 1329.279 WALL 775 3068927.422 335091.643 1346.437 TREE
293 3069006.191 335076.189 1329.618 WALL 776 3068930.468 335102.068 1347.312 FT
294 3069006.316 335075.865 1329.585 WALL 777 3068931.604 335102.583 1347.322 FT
295 3069004.16 335075.771 1330.038 WALL 778 3068928.283 335095.752 1346.986 SH
296 3069004.165 335075.955 1330.07 WALL 779 3068926.607 335095.785 1346.835 SH
297 3068998.755 335080.027 1332.111 GW 780 3068928.147 335109.308 1347.294 FT
298 3068998.402 335080.652 1332.133 GW 781 3068926.986 335108.781 1347.351 FT
299 3068999.143 335079.656 1330.389 RE 782 3068928.455 335099.139 1347.332 SH
300 3069000.845 335074.769 1330.94 WALL 783 3068923.766 335117.889 1347.306 FT
301 3069000.648 335075.031 1330.958 WALL 784 3068922.625 335117.211 1347.283 FT
302 3069000.566 335074.976 1330.529 RE 785 3068920.725 335124.195 1347.276 FT
303 3069000.867 335074.144 1330.191 SH 786 3068919.813 335123.878 1347.201 FT
304 3068995.936 335078.767 1332.235 GW 787 3068920.606 335112.701 1347.661 SH
305 3068995.765 335078.979 1333.213 GW 788 3068922.211 335112.059 1347.422 POL
306 3068995.255 335079.812 1333.083 GW 789 3068922.307 335109.033 1347.373 SH
307 3068995.49 335079.713 1332.59 GW 790 3068923.545 335108.802 1347.245 SH
308 3068990.802 335075.916 1333.424 GW 791 3068928.309 335114.128 1347.507 WALL
309 3068990.292 335076.841 1333.504 GW 792 3068925.873 335103.245 1346.866 SH
310 3068990.83 335075.74 1331.828 RE 793 3068927.208 335103.892 1347.303 SH
311 3068992.928 335071.511 1331.829 RE 794 3068931.861 335106.905 1347.43 WALL
312 3068993.679 335070.537 1331.063 SH 795 3068940.291 335089.48 1347.35 WALL
313 3068984.164 335072.015 1334.287 GW 796 3068943.062 335090.462 1347.358 WALL
314 3068983.679 335072.86 1334.23 GW 797 3068933.797 335102.781 1347.505 WALL
315 3068984.097 335071.964 1333.445 SH 798 3068934.776 335100.081 1347.475 POL
316 3068983.208 335070.824 1332.943 SH 799 3068937.365 335095.763 1347.323 WALL
317 3068982.608 335070.989 1334.506 GW 800 3068942.161 335093.062 1347.264 WALL
318 3068982.041 335071.814 1334.408 GW 801 3068950.225 335095.642 1347.24 WALL
319 3068995.4 335072.032 1331.736 WALL 802 3068946.145 335094.17 1347.121 WALL
320 3068995.132 335072.269 1331.78 WALL 803 3068949.59 335098.471 1347.11 SH
321 3068995.758 335071.518 1330.812 SH 804 3068950.996 335098.79 1347.156 CONTENAR
322 3068983.099 335069.855 1332.834 RE 805 3068950.038 335103.023 1346.762 CONTENAR
323 3068984.004 335066.577 1332.953 RE 806 3068950.131 335101.772 1347.173 WT
324 3068974.038 335064.52 1335.626 GW 807 3068946.002 335100.599 1347.021 WT
325 3068973.622 335065.431 1335.709 GW 808 3068943.713 335107.941 1347.044 WT
326 3068976.501 335061.151 1334.092 RE 809 3068937.097 335104.202 1347.112 WT1
327 3068974.263 335064.176 1333.905 RE 810 3068939.045 335098.249 1347.2 WT1
328 3068986.003 335066.348 1332.75 FT 811 3068944.954 335099.877 1347.233 WT1
329 3068985.117 335066.083 1332.796 FT 812 3068945.273 335097.656 1347.053 SH
330 3068983.679 335061.289 1331.257 FT 813 3068942.66 335096.155 1347.085 SH
331 3068984.284 335061.07 1331.286 FT 814 3068941.784 335093.348 1347.366 TREE
332 3068982.998 335056.735 1329.332 FT 815 3068940.198 335091.844 1347.323 BOARING
Page 7 of 10
333 3068982.356 335056.924 1329.35 FT 817 3068960.349 335116.312 1348.284 SH
334 3068968.386 335054.632 1335.675 RE 818 3068963.302 335112.351 1348.404 SH
335 3068966.756 335056.855 1335.699 RE 819 3068958.029 335112.676 1348.329 WALL
336 3068982.213 335054.196 1329.191 TEMPLE 820 3068953.457 335111.489 1347.899 WALL
337 3068982.968 335053.646 1329.183 TEMPLE 821 3068952.561 335112.351 1347.546 SH
338 3068982.211 335052.492 1329.169 TEMPLE 822 3068952.757 335115.192 1348.185 TREE
339 3068965.217 335057.576 1337.414 GW 823 3068952.352 335114.898 1347.391 SH
340 3068964.81 335058.099 1337.663 GW 824 3068971.964 335121.237 1348.087 RE
341 3069032.577 335062.245 1324.929 HC 825 3068966.528 335119.061 1348.174 RE
342 3068955.547 335047.896 1337.689 TP5 826 3068966.331 335132.754 1347.924 RE
343 3068988.336 335101.952 1343.855 SH 827 3068963.245 335131.578 1347.921 RE
344 3068988.919 335099.985 1343.05 SH 828 3068963.559 335145.144 1347.948 RE
345 3068986.523 335098.82 1343.575 SH 829 3068959.034 335144.194 1347.947 RE
346 3068986.762 335095.164 1341.329 SH 830 3068957.913 335144.756 1347.924 TP12
347 3068982.835 335095.501 1344.03 SH 832 3068953.808 335148.95 1347.55 HC
348 3068984.442 335092.993 1342.088 SH 833 3068955.842 335150.972 1347.559 HC
349 3068980.539 335092.066 1344.171 SH 834 3068957.061 335149.904 1347.661 HC
350 3068978.449 335089.774 1344.338 SH 835 3068960.404 335153.167 1347.702 HC
352 3068981.511 335090.005 1342.623 SH 836 3068949.418 335153.123 1347.327 HC
353 3068975.94 335087.176 1344.121 SH 837 3068946.925 335145.44 1347.787 HUT
354 3068978.52 335087.184 1342.556 SH 838 3068945.754 335148.062 1347.596 HUT
355 3068985.487 335075.794 1334.289 SH 839 3068943.372 335144.104 1347.724 HUT
356 3068989.095 335078.413 1334.102 SH 840 3068941.366 335138.693 1347.64 HC
357 3068992.059 335080.273 1334.189 SH 841 3068957.148 335143.345 1347.665 HC
358 3068978.983 335086.089 1341.676 SH 842 3068959.176 335143.963 1347.96 RE
359 3068995.919 335083.013 1333.672 SH 843 3068957.106 335148.031 1347.937 RE
360 3068973.239 335083.958 1344.048 SH 844 3068949.926 335144.114 1347.735 RE
361 3069000.443 335084.134 1332.842 SH 845 3068951.947 335148.104 1347.641 RE
362 3069002.495 335086.641 1333.01 SH 846 3068947.045 335146.927 1347.608 RE
363 3068973.26 335083.787 1344.029 SH 847 3068949.604 335149.856 1347.564 RE
364 3069000.234 335088.919 1334.427 SH 848 3068940.829 335157.169 1346.992 RE
365 3068996.761 335086.914 1334.971 SH 849 3068962.47 335145.252 1347.994 MH
366 3068994.103 335084.34 1334.874 SH 850 3068961.958 335146.618 1347.973 MH
367 3068991.772 335082.327 1334.758 SH 851 3068963.755 335145.713 1348.022 MH
368 3068989.096 335080.809 1335.159 SH 852 3068963.25 335147.155 1347.952 MH
369 3068977.508 335082.704 1340.558 SH 853 3068963.926 335145.357 1348.039 HUT
370 3068989.375 335084.608 1336.171 SH 854 3068964.6 335141.486 1347.99 HUT
371 3068992.73 335086.662 1335.956 SH 855 3068966.228 335146.03 1347.972 HUT
372 3068995.499 335088.814 1335.804 SH 856 3068967.083 335146.245 1347.951 HC
373 3068997.963 335091.415 1335.866 SH 857 3068976.551 335149.287 1347.96 HC
374 3069001.63 335092.323 1332.821 HC 858 3068964.157 335147.166 1348.013 RE
375 3068993.965 335092.171 1337.341 SH 859 3068961.104 335150.29 1348.065 RE
376 3068970.163 335080.907 1343.595 SH 860 3068983.364 335154.249 1348.128 HC
377 3068991.226 335089.484 1337.782 SH 861 3068957.819 335149.357 1347.978 WALL
378 3068974.162 335079.29 1341.018 SH 862 3068961.306 335152.53 1348.014 WALL
379 3068989.599 335086.76 1337.142 SH 863 3068969.584 335160.849 1347.968 WALL
380 3068967.298 335077.319 1343.358 SH 864 3068969.573 335160.771 1347.979 TP
Page 8 of 10
381 3068989.69 335091.232 1339.021 SH 865 3068964.862 335155.894 1348.155 WALL
382 3068992.214 335093.013 1338.513 SH 866 3068971.293 335154.461 1348.111 RE
383 3068994.251 335095.359 1338.625 SH 867 3068968.116 335158.37 1348.121 RE
384 3068971.079 335076.482 1340.867 SH 868 3068976.633 335162.725 1348.064 RE
385 3068991.702 335096.703 1340.272 SH 869 3068973.205 335164.899 1348.007 RE
386 3068965.476 335074.867 1343.568 SH 870 3068979.256 335167.239 1348.219 TP13
387 3068969.795 335074.598 1340.87 SH 872 3068977.658 335163.066 1348.338 WT
388 3068963.208 335072.625 1344.375 SH 873 3068982.436 335158.402 1348.687 WT
389 3068980.882 335073.94 1335.12 SH 874 3068967.816 335163.623 1348.01 HC
390 3068966.434 335071.737 1341.971 SH 875 3068972.139 335174.871 1347.78 HC
391 3068976.868 335070.765 1335.543 SH 876 3068970.037 335181.363 1347.567 HC
392 3068960.486 335069.266 1344.824 SH 877 3068970.524 335192.766 1347.189 SH
393 3068973.117 335067.96 1336.25 SH 878 3068973.157 335181.952 1347.5 SH
394 3068958.331 335066.113 1345.025 TREE 879 3068966.729 335166.121 1347.903 HC
395 3068969.884 335064.173 1337.255 SH 880 3068975.509 335180.423 1347.72 WALL
396 3068962.68 335067.507 1342.889 SH 881 3068976.856 335175.846 1347.86 GATE
397 3068957.541 335064.749 1344.705 SH 882 3068977.406 335175.342 1348.334 GATE
398 3068966.809 335060.679 1337.394 SH 883 3068968.927 335166.907 1348.096 HC
399 3068962.213 335058.45 1338.762 SH 884 3068977.966 335175.797 1348.371 GATE
400 3068959.728 335064.031 1343.209 SH 885 3068966.944 335173.012 1348.114 HC
401 3068960.243 335056.47 1339.356 SH 886 3068980.878 335172.05 1348.407 GATE
402 3068958.585 335058.632 1341.052 SH 887 3068981.422 335171.537 1348.352 GATE
403 3068964.789 335063.438 1340.354 SH 888 3068968.279 335171.806 1348.042 TLT
404 3068962.757 335065.069 1342.146 SH 889 3068970.381 335172.485 1347.924 TLT
405 3068967.384 335066.163 1339.635 SH 890 3068981.908 335172.007 1348.321 GATE
406 3068964.841 335068.085 1341.985 SH 891 3068981.981 335172.139 1348.313 WALL
407 3068968.877 335068.784 1339.102 SH 893 3068969.874 335174.047 1348.298 HC TLT
408 3068970.948 335071.165 1338.93 SH 894 3068983.234 335170.394 1348.332 WALL
409 3068967.344 335072.248 1341.568 SH 895 3068986.108 335166.106 1348.2 WALL
410 3068974.467 335072.553 1337.331 SH 896 3068988.242 335162.835 1348.126 WALL
411 3068970.5 335074.477 1340.629 SH 897 3068947.544 335058.15 1340.83 SH
412 3068976.587 335074.288 1337.516 SH 898 3068949 335062.114 1342.856 SH
413 3068973.596 335077.189 1340.317 SH 899 3068950.455 335066.078 1344.883 SH
414 3068978.83 335075.838 1337.009 SH
415 3068960.196 335072.958 1346.101 SH
416 3068976.025 335079.615 1339.863 SH
417 3068980.867 335077.928 1336.682 SH
418 3068961.415 335074.456 1346.022 SH
419 3068983.11 335081.016 1337.28 SH
420 3068978.642 335083.138 1340.311 SH
421 3068984.054 335084.786 1338.528 SH
422 3068981.344 335086.358 1340.668 SH
423 3068985.685 335088.065 1338.974 SH
424 3068986.639 335092.538 1340.752 SH
425 3068983.305 335089.647 1341.478 SH
426 3069025.414 335049.576 1324.586 HC
428 3068989.508 335039.717 1325.194 HC
Page 9 of 10
429 3068989.423 335040.187 1324.989 DRN
430 3068989.638 335040.295 1324.984 DRN
431 3068992.776 335035.288 1325.157 HC
432 3068992.842 335035.587 1324.99 DRN
433 3068990.401 335038.817 1325.003 DRN
434 3068990.593 335038.878 1324.988 DRN
435 3068992.845 335035.922 1324.971 DRN
436 3069009.841 335047.588 1325.134 HC
437 3069009.984 335047.965 1325.054 DRN
438 3069010.108 335048.237 1324.837 DRN
439 3068982.458 335040.018 1325.468 TOILET
440 3068993.09 335039.647 1324.883 SH
441 3068986.627 335042.718 1324.977 SLAB
442 3068988.791 335040.15 1324.852 SLAB
443 3068996.789 335043.019 1324.87 SH
444 3068991.488 335043.084 1324.942 HUT
445 3068990.055 335044.659 1325.043 HUT
446 3069001.315 335046.749 1324.897 SH
447 3068997.444 335043.322 1324.883 SH
448 3068996.482 335047.283 1324.98 HUT
449 3069005.792 335049.741 1325.018 SH
450 3068998.813 335052.257 1324.925 SH
451 3069001.993 335056.361 1325.319 SH
452 3069010.377 335050.036 1324.889 SH
453 3068999.316 335057.868 1325.419 TWELL
455 3069000.818 335067.877 1327.901 TP6
456 3068989.581 335047.689 1325.415 TWELL
457 3068990.868 335048.879 1325.096 BOARING
458 3068986.694 335045.2 1325.511 FT
459 3068986.139 335045.47 1325.619 FT
460 3068987.31 335048.166 1326.581 FT
461 3068986.504 335048.393 1326.552 FT
462 3068987.74 335050.539 1327.609 FT
463 3068984.792 335050.461 1328.503 FT
464 3068986.482 335050.548 1327.46 FT
465 3068984.507 335051.278 1328.654 FT
466 3068984.617 335052.054 1328.835 TP
467 3068984.268 335053.629 1328.943 FT
468 3068983.662 335053.517 1329.098 FT
469 3069003.774 335057.385 1325.277 WALL
470 3069003.493 335057.247 1325.355 WALL
471 3069006.084 335059.251 1325.434 WALL
472 3069005.888 335059.006 1325.461 WALL
473 3068987.86 335050.489 1327.453 SH
474 3068989.654 335049.674 1325.424 SH
475 3068991.231 335055.378 1327.712 SH
476 3068993.661 335053.667 1325.233 SH
Page 10 of 10
FOUNDATION DESIGN
Project: Hospital building
Location: Kathmandu
Client: Kanti hospital
Data
Weight of soil 18 KN/m3
Angle of Repose (assume) 30
Allowable bearing capacity of soil (assume) 157 KN/m2
Concrete grade, fc 20 N/Mm2
Steel Grade, (fst) 415 N/mm2
xu,l 0.416 for grade 415 N/m2
tauu,max 0.36 N/mm2
Effective cover 1.1 55 mm
ex ey
size of column Size of Footing adopted width effective width ex ey
check check
Min
unfactor unfacto Unfactore Momen Moment Area of
S No. Joint Load case Type Depth of
ed Hx red Hy d axial t (Mx) (My) Footing
Footing X
B D load X (min) Y X (min) Y Y
(min)
m m m m
1 1 DCon2 mid 0.60 0.60 39.90 39.32 1029.43 32.41 0.0286 0.97 6.56 2.60 2.50 2.80 2.80 2.74 2.80 7.66 0.03 0.00 ok ok
DCon7-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 57.23 46.73 985.419 96.03 1.786 0.97 6.28 2.50 2.50 2.80 2.80 2.61 2.76 7.20 0.10 0.00 ok ok
DCon8-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 47.23 59.28 983.895 67.15 2.5985 0.97 6.27 2.50 2.50 2.80 2.80 2.66 2.72 7.25 0.07 0.00 ok ok
2 3 DCon2 mid 0.60 0.60 1.61 71.04 1761.35 3.443 0.0732 0.97 11.22 3.30 3.40 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 12.24 0.00 0.00 ok ok
DCon7-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 32.24 68.43 1511.57 78.4 1.8123 0.97 9.63 3.10 3.10 3.50 3.50 3.40 3.45 11.73 0.05 0.00 ok ok
DCon8-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 18.61 88.64 1556.74 45.41 2.5303 0.97 9.92 3.10 3.20 3.50 3.50 3.44 3.39 11.66 0.03 0.00 ok ok
3 5 DCon2 mid 0.60 0.60 26.17 69.83 1438.03 23.21 0.0437 0.97 9.16 3.00 3.10 3.20 3.20 3.17 3.20 10.14 0.02 0.00 ok ok
DCon7-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 24.74 68.66 1519.82 76.47 1.6677 0.97 9.68 3.10 3.10 3.20 3.20 3.10 3.16 9.78 0.05 0.00 ok ok
DCon8-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 6.48 92.90 1505.91 38.37 2.17 0.97 9.59 3.10 3.10 3.20 3.20 3.15 3.09 9.72 0.03 0.00 ok ok
4 8 DCon2 mid 0.60 0.60 41.43 40.23 601.721 13.18 0.2285 0.97 3.83 2.00 1.90 3.60 3.60 3.56 3.60 12.80 0.02 0.00 ok ok
DCon7-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 77.07 109.58 1720.02 81.12 3.737 0.97 10.96 3.30 3.30 3.60 3.60 3.51 3.51 12.30 0.05 0.00 ok ok
DCon8-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 20.81 220.58 2115.11 45.42 4.6294 0.97 13.47 3.70 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.56 3.40 12.08 0.02 0.00 ok ok
5 19 DCon2 mid 0.60 0.60 70.26 4.02 1737.32 65.84 0.0045 0.97 11.07 3.30 3.40 3.50 3.50 3.42 3.50 11.98 0.04 0.00 ok ok
DCon7-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 79.34 17.41 1552.05 120.4 1.7473 0.97 9.89 3.10 3.20 3.50 3.50 3.34 3.47 11.61 0.08 0.00 ok ok
DCon8-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 64.70 33.90 1499.76 78.54 2.4536 0.97 9.55 3.10 3.10 3.50 3.50 3.40 3.44 11.67 0.05 0.00 ok ok
6 21 DCon2 mid 0.60 0.60 0.62 3.31 3057.24 1.299 0.0461 0.97 19.47 4.40 4.40 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 20.25 0.00 0.00 ok ok
DCon7-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 35.79 16.58 2516.23 82.41 1.7624 0.97 16.03 4.00 4.00 4.50 4.50 4.43 4.46 19.77 0.03 0.00 ok ok
DCon8-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 15.89 44.98 2503.13 34.62 2.4655 0.97 15.94 4.00 4.00 4.50 4.50 4.47 4.36 19.49 0.01 0.00 ok ok
7 23 DCon2 mid 0.60 0.60 4.37 2.26 3111.34 7.192 0.1285 0.97 19.82 4.50 4.40 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 20.23 0.00 0.00 ok ok
DCon7-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 30.23 21.65 2549.31 76.04 1.7468 0.97 16.24 4.00 4.10 4.50 4.50 4.44 4.45 19.78 0.03 0.00 ok ok
DCon8-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 9.95 55.05 2553.75 27.77 2.3082 0.97 16.27 4.00 4.10 4.50 4.50 4.48 4.33 19.41 0.01 0.00 ok ok
8 25 DCon2 mid 0.60 0.60 60.94 24.43 1554.71 60.6 0.1899 0.97 9.90 3.10 3.20 3.40 3.40 3.32 3.40 11.29 0.04 0.00 ok ok
DCon7-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 22.87 53.25 1528.05 27.12 1.7822 0.97 9.73 3.10 3.10 3.40 3.40 3.36 3.27 11.00 0.02 0.00 ok ok
DCon8-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 37.39 103.79 1795.86 14.96 2.299 0.97 11.44 3.40 3.40 3.40 3.40 3.38 3.09 10.46 0.01 0.00 ok ok
9 34 DCon2 mid 0.60 0.60 6.92 32.64 546.027 5.601 0.0203 0.97 3.48 1.90 1.80 2.80 2.80 2.78 2.80 7.78 0.01 0.00 ok ok
DCon7-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 55.42 11.61 1244.35 104.9 1.9347 0.97 7.93 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.80 2.63 2.76 7.27 0.08 0.00 ok ok
DCon8-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 25.64 0.26 820.88 44.23 2.2194 0.97 5.23 2.30 2.30 2.80 2.80 2.69 2.70 7.27 0.05 0.00 ok ok
10 35 DCon2 mid 0.60 0.60 39.69 22.13 318.082 8.507 1.6268 0.97 2.03 1.40 1.40 3.80 3.80 3.75 3.79 14.20 0.03 0.01 ok ok
DCon7-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 207.56 170.13 2158.09 58.82 0.3618 0.97 13.75 3.70 3.70 3.80 3.80 3.75 3.79 14.19 0.03 0.00 ok ok
DCon8-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 113.50 173.68 1602.63 31.87 0.9054 0.97 10.21 3.20 3.20 3.80 3.80 3.76 3.74 14.08 0.02 0.00 ok ok
11 39 DCon2 mid 0.60 0.60 75.00 34.04 1077.27 9.281 1.7201 0.97 6.86 2.60 2.60 4.50 4.50 4.48 4.50 20.16 0.01 0.00 ok ok
DCon7-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 153.14 11.72 3500.69 102.7 3.096 0.97 22.30 4.70 4.70 4.50 4.50 4.44 4.44 19.72 0.03 0.00 ok ok
DCon8-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 60.26 19.74 2307.52 44.93 3.0368 0.97 14.70 3.80 3.90 4.50 4.50 4.46 4.36 19.47 0.02 0.00 ok ok
12 41 DCon2 mid 0.60 0.60 1.21 12.16 3067.42 5.991 0.2105 0.97 19.54 4.40 4.40 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 20.23 0.00 0.00 ok ok
DCon7-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 40.32 8.27 2537.97 96.49 1.8424 0.97 16.17 4.00 4.00 4.50 4.50 4.42 4.46 19.74 0.04 0.00 ok ok
DCon8-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 18.08 42.25 2541.11 44.48 2.4683 0.97 16.19 4.00 4.00 4.50 4.50 4.46 4.39 19.60 0.02 0.00 ok ok
13 46 DCon2 mid 0.60 0.60 78.26 35.50 1519.87 87.61 0.3401 0.97 9.68 3.10 3.10 3.40 3.40 3.28 3.40 11.17 0.06 0.00 ok ok
DCon7-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 39.75 13.45 1410.99 2.319 1.9669 0.97 8.99 3.00 3.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 1.70 5.79 0.00 0.00 ok ok
DCon8-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 54.30 13.02 1404.38 41.32 2.4906 0.97 8.95 3.00 3.00 3.40 3.40 3.34 3.28 10.96 0.03 0.00 ok ok
14 64 DCon2 mid 0.60 0.60 69.67 177.60 1063.09 26.22 0.1293 0.97 6.77 2.60 2.60 3.20 3.20 3.15 3.20 10.08 0.02 0.00 ok ok
DCon7-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 92.29 170.53 1301.46 17.3 1.1774 0.97 8.29 2.90 2.90 3.20 3.20 3.17 3.06 9.72 0.01 0.00 ok ok
DCon8-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 71.05 161.65 1345.54 0.444 1.3841 0.97 8.57 2.90 3.00 3.20 3.20 3.20 -3.04 -9.73 0.00 0.00 ok ok
16 68 DCon2 mid 0.60 0.60 22.74 3.70 2283.81 32.68 1.4899 0.97 14.55 3.80 3.80 3.90 3.90 3.87 3.90 15.09 0.01 0.00 ok ok
DCon7-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 71.09 23.89 2371.77 125.3 3.0688 0.97 15.11 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.79 3.85 14.61 0.05 0.00 ok ok
DCon8-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 48.19 51.40 2089.72 79.7 4.0144 0.97 13.31 3.60 3.70 3.90 3.90 3.82 3.80 14.53 0.04 0.00 ok ok
17 70 DCon2 mid 0.60 0.60 51.54 43.09 1664.19 54.24 0.2195 0.97 10.60 3.30 3.20 3.50 3.50 3.43 3.50 12.02 0.03 0.00 ok ok
DCon7-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 4.11 18.06 1516.26 58.85 1.8489 0.97 9.66 3.10 3.10 3.50 3.50 3.42 3.44 11.76 0.04 0.00 ok ok
DCon8-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 15.93 9.46 1518.03 14.04 2.4921 0.97 9.67 3.10 3.10 3.50 3.50 3.48 3.14 10.95 0.01 0.00 ok ok
18 71 DCon2 mid 0.60 0.60 4.47 41.53 771.585 4.022 0.0103 0.97 4.91 2.20 2.20 2.50 2.50 2.49 2.50 6.22 0.01 0.00 ok ok
DCon7-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 17.87 30.19 904.543 37.47 0.5549 0.97 5.76 2.40 2.40 2.50 2.50 2.42 2.47 5.97 0.04 0.00 ok ok
DCon8-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 8.24 19.58 780.224 19.44 0.7667 0.97 4.97 2.20 2.30 2.50 2.50 2.45 2.42 5.93 0.02 0.00 ok ok
19 84 DCon2 mid 0.60 0.60 6.11 30.93 750.292 9.003 1.2049 0.97 4.78 2.20 2.20 2.50 2.50 2.48 2.50 6.18 0.01 0.00 ok ok
DCon7-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 48.40 0.76 979.654 45.27 1.1694 0.97 6.24 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.41 2.45 5.89 0.05 0.00 ok ok
DCon8-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 40.96 13.39 1014.26 32.14 1.6795 0.97 6.46 2.50 2.60 2.50 2.50 2.44 2.40 5.84 0.03 0.00 ok ok
20 85 DCon2 mid 0.60 0.60 37.86 11.38 915.349 29.96 0.8285 0.97 5.83 2.40 2.40 2.60 2.60 2.53 2.60 6.59 0.03 0.00 ok ok
DCon7-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 10.57 5.73 1163.86 25.89 0.4897 0.97 7.41 2.70 2.70 2.60 2.60 2.56 2.56 6.55 0.02 0.00 ok ok
DCon8-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 4.36 34.37 998.654 9.122 0.4425 0.97 6.36 2.50 2.50 2.60 2.60 2.58 2.50 6.46 0.01 0.00 ok ok
21 87 DCon2 mid 0.60 0.60 25.42 27.82 137.646 22.74 0.2725 0.97 0.88 0.90 1.00 1.50 1.50 1.17 1.50 1.75 0.17 0.00 ok ok
DCon7-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 0.62 16.20 133.526 24.43 0.6373 0.97 0.85 0.90 0.90 1.50 1.50 1.13 1.45 1.64 0.18 0.00 ok ok
DCon8-1 Max mid 0.60 0.60 7.51 4.01 128.149 10.96 0.7913 0.97 0.82 0.90 0.90 1.50 1.50 1.33 1.36 1.80 0.09 0.01 ok ok
Remarks
DCon2 Dead+live
DCon7-1 Max Dead+Eqx
DCon8-1 Max Dead+Eqy
Check for Two way Check for one way D
Stress on Moment Moment Shear Shear Trial
D assume area of assume area of
S No. Joint Max soil footing due at x at y
Min soil provided ast steel in X ast steel in Y
pressure to axial direction direction
Pressur Che Che edge
loan (Pu) mux muy Spacing Spacing
e ck ck
tvx ks tc tvx tc D d in X in Y
N/mm2 N/mm2 N/mm2 N/mm2 m m mm f mm f mm
1 1 153.16 109.45 229.75 134.36 126.65 0.81 1 1.12 OK 0.34 0.36 OK 0.50 0.45 600.00 300.00 847.607 850.11 799.01 800.62 16 150 16 150
135.58 65.53 203.37 133.88 112.50 0.71 1 1.12 OK 0.29 0.36 OK 0.50 0.45 600.00 300.00
129.62 71.17 194.43 121.57 107.72 0.68 1 1.12 OK 0.27 0.36 OK 0.50 0.45 600.00 300.00
2 3 151.90 135.67 227.85 223.92 223.31 0.85 1 1.12 OK 0.33 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00 1050.75 1055.09 1047.90 1052.18 16 150 16 150
116.15 81.28 174.22 183.62 171.03 0.65 1 1.12 OK 0.24 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00
116.04 87.29 174.05 177.76 170.97 0.65 1 1.12 OK 0.23 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00
3 5 157.87 122.99 236.81 189.82 185.02 0.71 1 1.12 OK 0.28 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00 891.406 893.62 868.89 870.78 16 150 16 150
140.44 97.03 210.66 178.10 164.87 0.63 1 1.12 OK 0.24 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00
134.50 100.79 201.76 164.11 157.99 0.61 1 1.12 OK 0.22 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00
4 8 56.03 36.83 84.04 91.04 88.40 0.33 1 1.12 OK 0.13 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00 1175.85 1182.25 1145.27 1151.06 16 125 16 150
129.31 83.04 193.96 217.38 204.51 0.77 1 1.12 OK 0.28 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00
154.34 106.79 231.51 250.63 244.11 0.92 1 1.12 OK 0.31 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00
5 19 158.83 124.81 238.25 246.30 233.49 0.89 1 1.12 OK 0.34 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00 1155.77 1161.96 1095.70 1100.75 16 125 16 150
123.16 79.56 184.73 201.65 181.33 0.69 1 1.12 OK 0.26 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00
115.29 80.60 172.93 182.39 169.87 0.64 1 1.12 OK 0.24 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00
6 21 151.32 150.63 226.98 409.89 409.71 0.83 1 1.12 OK 0.30 0.36 OK 0.90 0.85 1000.00 300.00 1349.44 1355.04 1348.90 1354.45 20 150 20 150
106.60 92.21 159.90 298.65 288.83 0.58 1 1.12 OK 0.21 0.36 OK 0.90 0.85 1000.00 300.00
104.05 93.73 156.07 285.83 282.01 0.57 1 1.12 OK 0.19 0.36 OK 0.90 0.85 1000.00 300.00
7 23 154.56 152.73 231.85 419.50 418.50 0.85 1 1.12 OK 0.30 0.36 OK 0.90 0.85 1000.00 300.00 1381.09 1387.11 1377.85 1383.77 20 150 20 150
107.54 93.88 161.32 300.39 291.38 0.59 1 1.12 OK 0.21 0.36 OK 0.90 0.85 1000.00 300.00
105.90 95.88 158.85 290.01 286.99 0.58 1 1.12 OK 0.19 0.36 OK 0.90 0.85 1000.00 300.00
8 25 153.54 115.44 230.32 222.17 209.91 0.80 1 1.12 OK 0.31 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00 1042.8 1047.13 985.35 988.69 16 150 16 150
116.25 95.25 174.37 163.10 159.17 0.61 1 1.12 OK 0.22 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00
139.32 109.24 208.98 192.79 190.79 0.73 1 1.12 OK 0.23 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00
9 34 77.67 61.62 116.51 65.48 64.23 0.41 1 1.12 OK 0.17 0.36 OK 0.50 0.45 600.00 300.00 968.689 973.86 832.66 834.75 16 150 16 150
159.13 94.82 238.69 153.55 131.97 0.84 1 1.12 OK 0.34 0.36 OK 0.50 0.45 600.00 300.00
97.32 70.21 145.98 88.94 80.88 0.51 1 1.12 OK 0.20 0.36 OK 0.50 0.45 600.00 300.00
10 35 29.22 14.84 43.83 54.48 53.00 0.14 1 1.12 OK 0.05 0.36 OK 0.80 0.75 900.00 300.00 1077.86 1081.38 1041.24 1044.23 16 150 16 150
154.47 84.65 231.71 288.22 278.40 0.71 1 1.12 OK 0.26 0.36 OK 0.80 0.75 900.00 300.00
114.26 63.31 171.40 211.21 206.04 0.53 1 1.12 OK 0.19 0.36 OK 0.80 0.75 900.00 300.00
11 39 60.38 46.01 90.58 164.98 163.77 0.41 1 1.12 OK 0.15 0.36 OK 0.80 0.75 900.00 300.00 1582.21 1592.35 1536.01 1545.22 20 150 20 150
151.69 124.91 227.53 423.47 411.07 1.03 1 1.12 OK 0.36 0.36 OK 0.80 0.75 900.00 300.00
97.48 84.84 146.22 269.36 264.29 0.66 1 1.12 OK 0.22 0.36 OK 0.80 0.75 900.00 300.00
12 41 152.77 150.19 229.15 414.46 413.64 0.84 1 1.12 OK 0.30 0.36 OK 0.90 0.85 1000.00 300.00 1364.5 1370.30 1361.89 1367.56 20 150 20 150
108.00 92.53 162.01 304.24 292.64 0.59 1 1.12 OK 0.21 0.36 OK 0.90 0.85 1000.00 300.00
106.04 94.74 159.06 292.42 287.40 0.58 1 1.12 OK 0.20 0.36 OK 0.90 0.85 1000.00 300.00
13 46 157.93 105.02 236.89 234.70 215.94 0.82 1 1.12 OK 0.32 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00 1101.6 1106.96 1013.71 1017.42 16 150 16 150
103.04 92.25 154.56 141.19 141.14 0.54 1 1.12 OK -0.01 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00
108.71 85.67 163.06 155.13 148.98 0.57 1 1.12 OK 0.20 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00
14 64 142.60 65.04 213.90 173.77 167.14 0.64 1 1.12 OK 0.25 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00 816.029 817.27 785.05 785.80 16 150 16 150
133.26 70.10 199.89 159.50 156.39 0.60 1 1.12 OK 0.21 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00
130.95 79.29 196.43 153.54 153.71 0.59 1 1.12 OK -0.80 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00
16 68 156.01 144.29 234.02 304.93 299.79 0.77 1 1.12 OK 0.28 0.36 OK 0.80 0.75 900.00 300.00 1140.2 1144.41 1121.13 1124.95 16 125 16 150
142.05 107.44 213.08 291.04 273.18 0.70 1 1.12 OK 0.25 0.36 OK 0.80 0.75 900.00 300.00
123.94 95.89 185.91 249.45 238.54 0.61 1 1.12 OK 0.21 0.36 OK 0.80 0.75 900.00 300.00
17 70 153.41 118.30 230.11 236.13 225.55 0.86 1 1.12 OK 0.33 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00 1108.05 1113.37 1058.60 1062.87 16 125 16 150
107.68 90.37 161.52 167.18 158.56 0.60 1 1.12 OK 0.22 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00
103.12 95.15 154.68 153.59 151.94 0.58 1 1.12 OK 0.18 0.36 OK 0.65 0.60 750.00 300.00
18 71 135.60 111.31 203.40 83.33 82.38 0.54 1 1.12 OK 0.23 0.36 OK 0.50 0.45 600.00 300.00 572.583 571.04 524.21 522.04 16 150 16 150
136.32 95.24 204.48 90.61 82.93 0.54 1 1.12 OK 0.23 0.36 OK 0.50 0.45 600.00 300.00
111.21 88.53 166.81 71.35 67.70 0.44 1 1.12 OK 0.17 0.36 OK 0.50 0.45 600.00 300.00
19 84 132.50 107.59 198.75 82.66 80.78 0.53 1 1.12 OK 0.22 0.36 OK 0.50 0.45 600.00 300.00 631.031 630.13 579.04 577.33 16 150 16 150
148.72 102.07 223.08 99.86 90.59 0.59 1 1.12 OK 0.24 0.36 OK 0.50 0.45 600.00 300.00
150.23 109.42 225.35 97.80 91.60 0.60 1 1.12 OK 0.23 0.36 OK 0.50 0.45 600.00 300.00
20 85 156.00 114.81 234.01 113.00 105.80 0.69 1 1.12 OK 0.29 0.36 OK 0.50 0.45 600.00 300.00 713.599 713.86 668.39 667.73 16 150 16 150
147.61 127.86 221.41 104.65 100.00 0.65 1 1.12 OK 0.27 0.36 OK 0.50 0.45 600.00 300.00
127.14 109.23 190.71 87.72 86.14 0.56 1 1.12 OK 0.22 0.36 OK 0.50 0.45 600.00 300.00
21 87 158.89 -36.53 238.33 38.07 19.26 0.12 1 1.12 OK 0.00 0.36 OK 0.50 0.45 600.00 300.00 243.032 239.04 123.01 120.38 12 150 12 150
97.48 -2.53 146.23 24.85 11.98 0.07 1 1.12 OK -0.01 0.36 OK 0.50 0.45 600.00 300.00
72.11 19.02 108.16 12.75 8.92 0.05 1 1.12 OK -0.02 0.36 OK 0.50 0.45 600.00 300.00
Remarks
DCon2
DCon7-1 Max
DCon8-1 Max
Kanti Bal Hospital
I
Slope stability analysis

Project
Task : Kanti Bal Hospital
Part : I
Description : Slope Stability Analysis at Section 1-1
User : Sanju K. Jain
Date : 8/31/2018
Analysis type : in effective parameters
Interface
Numbe Coordinates of interface points [m]
Interface location
r x z x z x z
0.00 15.00 2.81 15.31 3.27 15.40
6.61 17.35 6.70 17.39 6.73 17.43
7.10 17.41 9.66 17.45 10.09 18.09
10.64 19.70 15.77 21.90 17.48 22.58
18.00 22.62 18.80 22.67 22.13 22.71
22.16 22.78 23.70 24.50 24.69 24.46
26.74 25.11 28.23 26.20 29.61 27.14
1 31.50 28.32 34.03 30.02 34.80 30.69
35.14 30.88 36.47 31.78 39.04 33.58
39.61 33.89 39.86 34.41 44.15 36.79
46.24 37.11 51.78 37.39 54.35 37.64
57.47 37.64 58.22 37.68 60.93 37.42
64.10 37.20 68.01 37.05 69.17 36.69
76.76 36.92 76.90 36.92
22.13 22.71 76.90 22.71
0.00 15.00 76.90 15.00
0.00 0.00 76.90 0.00
1
[Geo 5 - Slope stability | version 5.9.14.0 | Copyright (c) FINE Ltd. 2009 | www.finesoftware.eu]
Kanti Bal Hospital
I
Soil parameters - effective stress state

Numbe ef cef 
Name Pattern
r [°] [kPa] [kN/m3]
1 Silt~Sand~Clay 30.00 5.00 17.00
Soil parameters - uplift

Numbe sat s n
Name Pattern
r [kN/m3] [kN/m3] [–]
1 Silt~Sand~Clay 17.00
Soil parameters
Silt~Sand~Clay
Unit weight :  = 17.00 kN/m3
Angle of internal friction : ef = 30.00 °
Cohesion of soil : cef = 5.00 kPa
Saturated unit weight : sat = 17.00 kN/m3
Assigning and surfaces

Numbe Coordinates of surface points [m] Assigned
Surface position
r x z x z soil
76.90 22.71 76.90 36.92
Silt~Sand~Clay
76.76 36.92 69.17 36.69
68.01 37.05 64.10 37.20
60.93 37.42 58.22 37.68
57.47 37.64 54.35 37.64
51.78 37.39 46.24 37.11
44.15 36.79 39.86 34.41
1 39.61 33.89 39.04 33.58
36.47 31.78 35.14 30.88
34.80 30.69 34.03 30.02
31.50 28.32 29.61 27.14
28.23 26.20 26.74 25.11
24.69 24.46 23.70 24.50
22.16 22.78 22.13 22.71
76.90 15.00 76.90 22.71

Silt~Sand~Clay
22.13 22.71 18.80 22.67
18.00 22.62 17.48 22.58
15.77 21.90 10.64 19.70
10.09 18.09 9.66 17.45
2 7.10 17.41 6.73 17.43
6.70 17.39 6.61 17.35
3.27 15.40 2.81 15.31
0.00 15.00
2
Kanti Bal Hospital
I

Surface position
r x z x z soil
76.90 0.00 76.90 15.00
Silt~Sand~Clay
0.00 15.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 -5.00

Silt~Sand~Clay
76.90 -5.00 76.90 0.00
Water
Water type : GWT
Numbe Coordinates of GWT points [m]
GWT location
r x z x z x z
0.00 15.00 76.90 15.00
Analysis settings
Analysis settings : User-defined
Analysis type : Safety factor
Safety factor : 1.50
SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS IN STATIC CONDITION
Slope Stability Analysis: - Spencer method
Circular slip surface
Slip surface parameters
x= 22.38 [m] 1 = 8.90 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 52.78 [m] 2 = 55.72 [°]
Radius : R= 28.02 [m]
The slip surface after optimization.
Slope stability verification (Spencer)
Factor of safety = 1.22 < 1.50
Slope stability NOT ACCEPTABLE
3
Kanti Bal Hospital
I
Name : Kanti Bal Hospital Section - analysis : 1 - 1
Description : Slope Stability Analysis- Optimization using Spencer method for Section-1 Static Condition
[22.38; 52.78]
2
37.68
[45.53; 37.00] 33.00
1
[26.71; 25.10] 22.00
[0.00; 15.00] [76.90; 15.00]

11.00
0.00
-5.00
Slope Stability Analysis: Fellenius/Petterson method
x= 25.26 [m] 1 = 3.12 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 47.35 [m] 2 = 62.21 [°]
Radius : R= 22.35 [m]
Slope stability verification (Fellenius / Petterson)
Sum of active forces : Fa = 424.71 kN/m
Sum of passive forces : Fp = 493.84 kN/m
Sliding moment : Ma = 9492.31 kNm/m
Resisting moment : Mp = 11037.33 kNm/m

4
Kanti Bal Hospital
I

Description : Slope Stability Analysis- Optimization using Fellenius~Petterson method for Section-1 Static
Cond
[25.26; 47.35]
2
37.68
[45.03; 36.93] 33.00
1
[26.48; 25.03] 22.00
[0.00; 15.00] [76.90; 15.00]

11.00
0.00
-5.00
Slope Stability Analysis using Bishop method
x= 21.95 [m] 1 = 9.41 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 53.51 [m] 2 = 55.06 [°]
Radius : R= 28.81 [m]
Slope stability verification (Bishop)

5
Kanti Bal Hospital
I
Description : Slope Stability Analysis at Section 1 using Bishop method

[21.95; 53.51]
[45.57; 37.01]
1 1
1
2
[26.66; 25.09]
2
3
[0.00; 15.00] [76.90; 15.00]
3
4
4
SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS IN EARTHQUAKE CONDITION

x= 21.71 [m] 1 = 8.64 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 57.21 [m] 2 = 51.94 [°]
Radius : R= 32.51 [m]

6
Kanti Bal Hospital
I
[14.79; 64.33]
Description : Slope Stability Analysis at Section 1 using Bishop method for Earthquake Condn= Kh =0.25g
[47.14; 37.15]
1
1 1
2
2
[22.14; 22.72]
3
[0.00; 15.00] [76.90; 15.00]
3
0.25
4
4
Slope Stability Analysis using Fellenius/Petterson method

x= 25.12 [m] 1 = 1.16 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 49.97 [m] 2 = 59.42 [°]
Radius : R= 25.21 [m]

7
Kanti Bal Hospital
I

Description : Slope Stability Analysis Section
[24.73; 50.07] -1 using Fellenius~Peterson method for EQ Cond Kh=0.25g
2
37.68
[46.16; 37.10]
30.00
11
24.00
[26.66; 25.09] 2
18.00
3
[0.00; 15.00] [76.90; 15.00]
12.00
6.00
0.25
4 0.00
-5.00
0.00
6.00
12.00
18.00
24.00
30.00
36.00
42.00
48.00
54.00
60.00
66.00
72.00
76.90
Slope Stability Analysis using Spencer method
x= 16.39 [m] 1 = 8.06 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 63.25 [m] 2 = 50.47 [°]
Radius : R= 40.94 [m]
[20.15; 58.90]
Name : KantiBal Hospital Section - analysis : 1 - 1

Description : Slope Stability Analysis- Optimization using Spencer method for EQ Condn= Kh =0.25g
2
37.68
[46.83; 37.14]
30.00
1
24.00
[26.73; 25.10]
18.00
[0.00; 15.00] [76.90; 15.00]

12.00
6.00
0.25
0.00
-5.00
0.00
6.00
12.00
18.00
24.00
30.00
36.00
42.00
48.00
54.00
60.00
66.00
72.00
76.90
8
Kanti Bal Hospital Slope Stability Analysis Section 2
I

Project
Part : I
Description : Slope Stability Analysis Section-2
User : Sanju. K. Jain
Date : 8/31/2018
Interface
Interface location
r x z x z x z
0.00 15.00 0.50 15.45 0.74 15.11
0.77 15.07 1.07 15.09 1.52 15.10
4.09 15.47 8.36 15.27 9.47 15.37
9.61 15.37 12.61 15.48 12.89 15.50
17.02 15.73 19.41 15.73 19.60 15.76
20.47 16.04 21.64 16.38 22.20 16.53
22.34 16.55 23.91 16.92 24.34 16.94
26.21 17.16 27.70 17.51 28.25 17.54
28.27 17.75 28.46 17.78 28.67 18.32
29.62 18.33 30.11 18.33 31.05 19.87
31.51 21.00 31.65 21.24 32.44 21.51
36.99 22.40 37.22 22.55 37.69 22.57
1 42.07 22.88 42.99 23.99 43.15 24.21
43.29 24.24 45.19 24.66 45.41 24.71
45.75 24.97 46.15 25.17 47.52 26.06
47.56 26.07 47.69 26.14 48.70 26.66
50.46 27.35 53.25 28.84 54.70 29.95
55.73 30.86 56.15 31.14 56.98 31.83
60.27 34.82 60.72 35.38 62.70 37.38
65.10 37.86 65.47 37.97 66.54 38.18
69.01 38.28 74.78 38.41 79.54 38.42
79.93 38.41 80.37 38.38 80.65 38.37
80.82 38.33 91.86 37.85 92.59 37.64
95.73 37.78 96.22 37.73
43.29 24.24 96.22 24.24
0.00 15.00 96.22 15.00
1
I

Interface location
r x z x z x z
0.00 0.00 96.22 0.00

Numbe ef cef 
Name Pattern
r [°] [kPa] [kN/m3]
1 Silt~Sand~Clay 30.00 5.00 17.00

Numbe sat s n
Name Pattern
r [kN/m3] [kN/m3] [–]
Soil parameters
Silt~Sand~Clay

Surface position
r x z x z soil
96.22 24.24 96.22 37.73
Silt~Sand~Clay
95.73 37.78 92.59 37.64
91.86 37.85 80.82 38.33
80.65 38.37 80.37 38.38
79.93 38.41 79.54 38.42
74.78 38.41 69.01 38.28
66.54 38.18 65.47 37.97
65.10 37.86 62.70 37.38
60.72 35.38 60.27 34.82
1
56.98 31.83 56.15 31.14
55.73 30.86 54.70 29.95
53.25 28.84 50.46 27.35
48.70 26.66 47.69 26.14
47.56 26.07 47.52 26.06
46.15 25.17 45.75 24.97
45.41 24.71 45.19 24.66
43.29 24.24
2
I

Surface position
r x z x z soil
96.22 15.00 96.22 24.24
Silt~Sand~Clay
43.29 24.24 43.15 24.21
42.99 23.99 42.07 22.88
37.69 22.57 37.22 22.55
36.99 22.40 32.44 21.51
31.65 21.24 31.51 21.00
31.05 19.87 30.11 18.33
29.62 18.33 28.67 18.32
28.46 17.78 28.27 17.75
28.25 17.54 27.70 17.51
26.21 17.16 24.34 16.94
2
23.91 16.92 22.34 16.55
22.20 16.53 21.64 16.38
20.47 16.04 19.60 15.76
19.41 15.73 17.02 15.73
12.89 15.50 12.61 15.48
9.61 15.37 9.47 15.37
8.36 15.27 4.09 15.47
1.52 15.10 1.07 15.09
0.77 15.07 0.74 15.11
0.50 15.45 0.00 15.00
96.22 0.00 96.22 15.00

Silt~Sand~Clay
0.00 15.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 -5.00

Silt~Sand~Clay
96.22 -5.00 96.22 0.00
Water
Water type : GWT
GWT location
r x z x z x z
0.00 15.00 96.22 15.00
3
I
Analysis settings
SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS IN STATIC CONDITION

x= 49.94 [m] 1 = 11.34 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 44.91 [m] 2 = 64.32 [°]
Radius : R= 16.43 [m]
Description : Slope Stability Analysis Section-2 using Bishop method in Static Condition
2
[49.94; 44.91] 38.42
1 [64.75;1 37.79]
26.00
[53.17; 28.80]
2
[0.00; 15.00] 13.00

[96.22; 15.00]
3
0.00
4
-5.00
Slope stability analysis using Fellenius/Peterson method

x= 51.88 [m] 1 = 5.69 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 41.58 [m] 2 = 72.27 [°]
Radius : R= 12.85 [m]
4
I

Factor of safety = 1.03 <1.50
Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Fellenius/Peterson method in Static Condition
2
[51.88; 41.58] 38.42
1 [64.12;1 37.67]
26.00
[53.15; 28.79]
2
[0.00; 15.00] 13.00

[96.22; 15.00]
3
0.00
4
-5.00
Slope stability analysis using Spencer method

x= 50.02 [m] 1 = 11.07 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 44.72 [m] 2 = 64.70 [°]
Radius : R= 16.25 [m]
5
I
Name : Kanti Bal Hospital Section - analysis : 2 – 2
Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Spencer method for Section 2 for Static Condition
2
[50.02; 44.72] 38.42
1 [64.71;1 37.78]
26.00
[53.14; 28.77]
2
[0.00; 15.00] 13.00

[96.22; 15.00]
3
0.00
4
-5.00
Slope stability analysis using Bishop method

x= 46.94 [m] 1 = 12.18 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 50.55 [m] 2 = 57.34 [°]
Radius : R= 23.00 [m]
6
I

[46.94; 50.55]
Description: Slope Stability Analysis Section-2 using Bishop method for EQ Condn :- Kh=0.25g
2
38.42
[66.30; 38.14] 35.00
1 1
28.00
[51.79; 28.07]
21.00
2
[0.00; 15.00] 14.00

[96.22; 15.00]
3 7.00
0.25
0.00
4
-5.00
14.00
21.00
28.00
35.00
42.00
49.00
56.00
63.00
70.00
77.00
84.00
91.00
96.22
0.00
7.00
Slope stability analysis using Fellenius / Petterson method

x= 50.02 [m] 1 = 3.10 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 43.75 [m] 2 = 68.66 [°]
Radius : R= 16.20 [m]
7
I
Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Fellenius/Peterson method for EQ Cond:- Kh=0.25g
[50.02; 43.75] 2
38.42
[65.11; 37.85] 35.00
1
1
28.00
[50.90; 27.57]
21.00
2
[0.00; 15.00] 14.00

[96.22; 15.00]
3 7.00
0.25
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
7.00
14.00
21.00
28.00
35.00
42.00
49.00
56.00
63.00
70.00
77.00
84.00
91.00
96.22
Slope stability analysis using Spencer method
x= 47.93 [m] 1 = 13.87 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 48.89 [m] 2 = 58.53 [°]
Radius : R= 20.84 [m]
8
I

Description: Slope Stability Analysis using Spencer method
[47.93; 48.89] for Sect 2 for EQ Condition: Kh=0.25g
2
38.42
[65.70; 38.01] 35.00
1 1
28.00
[52.93; 28.66]
21.00
2
[0.00; 15.00] 14.00

[96.22; 15.00]
3 7.00
0.25
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
7.00
14.00
21.00
28.00
35.00
42.00
49.00
56.00
63.00
70.00
77.00
84.00
91.00
96.22
Input data (After Construction of building)
Surcharge
Surcharge / / / / Slope Magnitude
Numbe
Type z [m] / x1 x [m] / z1 l [m] / x2 b [m] / z2
r new change  [°] q, q1, f, F q2 unit
[m] [m] [m] [m]
1 Yes concentrated z = 36.51 x = 86.62 l = 2.80 b = 2.80 1029.43 kN
Surcharges
Numbe
Name
r
1 Column No:- 1
Slope Stability Analysis using Bishop method (After Construction of building)

x= 37.00 [m] 1 = -3.92 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 105.00 [m] 2 = 37.94 [°]
Radius : R= 85.00 [m]
Analysis of the slip surface without optimization.
Slope stability verification (all methods)
Bishop : FS = 1.92 > 1.50 ACCEPTABLE
Fellenius / Petterson : FS = 1.88 > 1.50 ACCEPTABLE
Spencer : FS = 1.90 > 1.50 ACCEPTABLE
Description : Slope Stability Analysis for Section 2 using Fellenius /Petterson method for Static condn
after construction
9
1029.43
I
1 2
38.42
1 [89.26; 37.96]
1 26.00
2
[31.19; 20.20]
[0.00; 15.00] [37.00; 105.00] 13.00
[96.22; 15.00]
3
0.00
4
-5.00
Name : Kanti Bal Hospital 1029.43 Section - analysis : 2 - 2
Description : Slope Stability Analysis for Section 2-2 using Spencer method for Static condn after
Construction
1 2
38.42
1 [89.26; 37.96]
1 26.00
2
[31.19; 20.20]
[0.00; 15.00] 13.00
[96.22; 15.00]
3
0.00
4
-5.00
Description : Kanti Bal Hospital Slope Stability Analysis Section-2 using Bishop method after
contruction in Static Condition
10
1029.43
I
1 2
38.42
1 [89.26; 37.96]
1 26.00
2
[31.19; 20.20]
[0.00; 15.00] 13.00
[96.22; 15.00]
3
0.00
4
-5.00
EARTHQUAKE CONDITION Kh= 0.25g
Slope Stability Analysis using Bishop method (After Construction of building)

x= 37.00 [m] 1 = -3.92 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 105.00 [m] 2 = 37.94 [°]
Radius : R= 85.00 [m]
Bishop : FS = 1.05 < 1.50 NOT ACCEPTABLE
Fellenius / Petterson : FS = 1.09 < 1.50 NOT ACCEPTABLE
Spencer : The solution has not been found.

Description : Slope Stability Analysis for Section 2 using Fellenius /Petterson method for EQ condition
Kh=0.25g after construction
11
1029.43
I
1 2
38.42
1 [89.26; 37.96]
1 26.00
2
[31.19; 20.20]
[37.00; 105.00]
[0.00; 15.00] 13.00
[96.22; 15.00]
3
0.25
0.00
4
-5.00

Description : Kanti Bal Hospital Slope Stability Analysis Section-2 using Bishop method after construction1029.43
in EQ Condition Kh=0.25g
1 2
38.42
1 [89.26; 37.96]
1 26.00
2
[31.19; 20.20]
[0.00; 15.00] 13.00
[96.22; 15.00]
3
0.25
0.00
4
-5.00
12
Slope Stability Analysis Section 3 Static & EQ before & after Building Construction
Sanju K. jain
Project Kanti Bal Hospital
Name: Slope Stability Analysis Section 3-3
Date : 8/31/2018
Interface
Interface location
r x z x z x z
0.00 15.00 0.41 14.89 3.04 14.77
9.88 15.41 10.73 15.41 17.79 15.65
19.16 15.85 22.06 15.55 23.99 16.04
24.14 16.03 27.24 15.94 27.75 16.87
28.18 16.82 29.50 18.16 29.64 18.12
30.26 18.04 30.40 18.30 33.71 19.94
35.66 20.70 36.11 21.34 36.40 21.48
36.65 21.51 38.53 22.03 42.15 22.08
42.26 23.08 42.37 23.44 44.01 23.92
44.45 23.93 45.50 24.24 47.30 25.11
47.70 25.34 50.03 26.66 50.93 26.75
1
51.00 26.75 51.09 26.81 51.85 27.31
53.21 28.17 54.04 28.68 56.43 30.30
57.23 31.02 57.98 31.59 59.44 32.70
60.77 33.90 61.43 34.40 63.28 35.92
64.39 36.51 67.63 37.84 68.92 38.12
70.30 38.25 72.18 38.33 73.80 38.37
75.29 38.26 76.58 38.26 78.84 38.24
82.12 38.20 89.64 38.36 92.96 38.26
96.65 38.31 97.40 38.28 97.86 38.31
98.27 37.78 101.72 37.57 108.39 37.66
42.37 23.44 108.39 23.44
0.00 14.00 108.39 14.00
0.00 0.00 108.39 0.00
1
Sanju K. jain
Numbe ef cef 
Name Pattern
r [°] [kPa] [kN/m3]
1 Silt~Sand~Clay 30.00 5.00 17.00

Numbe sat s n
Name Pattern
r [kN/m3] [kN/m3] [–]
Soil parameters
Silt~Sand~Clay

Surface position
r x z x z soil
108.39 23.44 108.39 37.66
Silt~Sand~Clay
101.72 37.57 98.27 37.78
97.86 38.31 97.40 38.28
96.65 38.31 92.96 38.26
89.64 38.36 82.12 38.20
78.84 38.24 76.58 38.26
75.29 38.26 73.80 38.37
72.18 38.33 70.30 38.25
68.92 38.12 67.63 37.84
64.39 36.51 63.28 35.92
1 61.43 34.40 60.77 33.90
59.44 32.70 57.98 31.59
57.23 31.02 56.43 30.30
54.04 28.68 53.21 28.17
51.85 27.31 51.09 26.81
51.00 26.75 50.93 26.75
50.03 26.66 47.70 25.34
47.30 25.11 45.50 24.24
44.45 23.93 44.01 23.92
42.37 23.44
2
Sanju K. jain
Surface position
r x z x z soil
108.39 14.00 108.39 23.44
Silt~Sand~Clay
42.37 23.44 42.26 23.08
42.15 22.08 38.53 22.03
36.65 21.51 36.40 21.48
36.11 21.34 35.66 20.70
33.71 19.94 30.40 18.30
30.26 18.04 29.64 18.12
29.50 18.16 28.18 16.82
2
27.75 16.87 27.24 15.94
24.14 16.03 23.99 16.04
22.06 15.55 19.16 15.85
17.79 15.65 10.73 15.41
9.88 15.41 3.04 14.77
0.41 14.89 0.00 15.00
0.00 14.00
108.39 0.00 108.39 14.00

Silt~Sand~Clay
0.00 14.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 -5.00

Silt~Sand~Clay
108.39 -5.00 108.39 0.00
Water
Water type : GWT
GWT location
r x z x z x z
0.00 14.00 108.39 14.00
Tensile crack
Tensile crack not inputted.
Earthquake
Earthquake not included.
Analysis settings
Slope Stability Analysis using Bishop method for Section 3-Static Condition before building
Construction
3
Sanju K. jain
x= 47.16 [m] 1 = 9.17 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 50.65 [m] 2 = 58.07 [°]
Radius : R= 24.20 [m]

Name : Kanti Bal Hospital Section - analysis : 3-3

Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Bishop method for Section 3-Static Condition before building
Construction
[47.16; 50.65]
2
38.37
[67.70; 37.85]
32.00
1
1
[51.02; 26.76] 24.00
2
16.00
[0.00; 14.00] [108.39; 14.00]
3 8.00
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
8.00
16.00
24.00
32.00
40.00
48.00
56.00
64.00
72.00
80.00
88.00
96.00
104.00
108.39
Slope stability analysis using Fellenius/ Petterson method before Building

Construction
x= 49.79 [m] 1 = 2.89 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 45.76 [m] 2 = 64.58 [°]
Radius : R= 19.05 [m]
4
Sanju K. jain
Factor of safety = 1.12 <1.50


Description : Slope Stability Analysis at Section 3 using Fellenius/ Petterson method for Static condition
before building COnstruction
[49.79; 45.76]
2
38.37
[67.00; 37.58]
1 1
27.00
[50.75; 26.73]
2 18.00
[0.00; 14.00] [108.39; 14.00]

9.00
3
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
9.00
18.00
27.00
36.00
45.00
54.00
63.00
72.00
81.00
90.00
99.00
108.39
Slope stability analysis using Spencer method before Building Construction Stage
x= 47.05 [m] 1 = 9.12 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 51.48 [m] 2 = 57.27 [°]
Radius : R= 25.03 [m]
5
Sanju K. jain
Name : Kanti Bal hospital Section - analysis : 3-3

Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Spencer method at Section 3 for Static condition and
before building construction
[47.05; 51.48]
2
38.37
[68.11; 37.95]
1 1 30.00
[51.02; 26.77]
2 20.00
[0.00; 14.00] [108.39; 14.00]

10.00
3
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
108.39
Slope stability analysis using Bishop method for Section 3 EQ Condition before
building Construction
x= 46.48 [m] 1 = 9.04 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 55.35 [m] 2 = 53.66 [°]
Radius : R= 28.95 [m]

6
Sanju K. jain
Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Spencer method at Section 3 for Static condition and
before building construction
[47.05; 51.48]
2
38.37
[68.11; 37.95]
1 1 30.00
[51.02; 26.77]
2 20.00
[0.00; 14.00] [108.39; 14.00]

10.00
3
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
108.39
Slope stability analysis using Bishop method for Section 3 EQ Condition before
x= 46.48 [m] 1 = 9.04 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 55.35 [m] 2 = 53.66 [°]
Radius : R= 28.95 [m]

6
Sanju K. jain

Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Bishop
[46.25; method for Section 3-EQ Condition Kh =0.25g before
53.86]
2
38.37
[68.77; 38.08]
1 1 30.00
[51.05; 26.78]
2 20.00
[0.00; 14.00] [108.39; 10.00

14.00]
3
0.25
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
108.39
Slope stability analysis using Fellenius /Peterson method for EQ Condition before
Building Construction
x= 46.48 [m] 1 = 0.75 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 49.99 [m] 2 = 61.61 [°]
Radius : R= 25.13 [m]


7
Sanju K. jain

Description : Slope Stability Analysis at Section 3 using Fellenius/ Petterson method for EQ condition Kh =
0.25g before building Construction
[46.48; 49.99]
2
38.37
[68.59; 38.04]
1 32.00
1
24.00
[46.81; 24.86]
2
16.00
[0.00; 14.00] [108.39; 14.00]
3 8.00
0.25
0.00
4
-5.00
16.00
24.00
32.00
40.00
48.00
56.00
64.00
72.00
80.00
88.00
96.00
0.00
8.00
104.00
Slope stability analysis using Spencer method at Section 3 for EQ condition kh =0.25g 108.39
before building Construction

x= 33.57 [m] 1 = 10.05 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 70.51 [m] 2 = 49.03 [°]
Radius : R= 49.17 [m]
8
Sanju K. jain
Name : Kanti Bal hospital Section - analysis : 3 - 3

Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Spencer method at Section 3 for EQ condition and before
building construction
[33.57; 70.51]
2
38.37
[70.70; 38.27]
1
1 26.00
[42.15; 22.09] 2
13.00
[0.00; 14.00] [108.39; 14.00]
3
0.25
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
13.00
26.00
39.00
52.00
65.00
78.00
91.00
104.00
108.39
Slope stability analysis using Bishop method after Building Construction Stage
Input data (After Building Construction Stage)

Surcharge
Numbe
[m] [m] [m] [m]
Surcharges
Numbe
Name
r
1 Column No:- 8
2 Column No:- 23
3 Column No:- 34
Slope Stability Analysis After Building Construction Stage in Static Condition

x= 27.74 [m] 1 = 3.76 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 125.84 [m] 2 = 34.13 [°]
Radius : R= 105.75 [m]
Slope stability verification (all methods) Bishop : FS = 1.72 > 1.50 ACCEPTABLE
9
[27.74; 125.84]
Sanju K. jain
Fellenius / Petterson : FS = 1.72 > 1.50 ACCEPTABLE
Spencer : FS = 1.73 > 1.50 ACCEPTABLE
Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Bishop, Fellenius/ Petterson & Spencer method for Section 3-
Static Condition after building Construction
3111.34
2115.11
1244.35
2 2 1
3 38.37
[87.07; 38.30]
1
1 26.00
2
[34.67; 20.32]
13.00
[0.00; 14.00] [108.39; 14.00]
3
0.00
4
-5.00
108.39
0.00
13.00
26.00
39.00
52.00
65.00
78.00
91.00

x= 28.74 [m] 1 = 0.99 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 107.84 [m] 2 = 39.18 [°]
Radius : R= 89.75 [m]
Bishop : FS = 0.94 < 1.50 NOT ACCEPTABLE
Fellenius / Petterson : FS = 1.00 < 1.50 NOT ACCEPTABLE
Spencer : The solution has not been found.
Description : Slope Stability Analysis at Section 3 using Bishop, Fellenius/ Petterson & Spencer method
for EQ condition after building Construction
10
Sanju K. jain
3111.34
2115.11
1244.35
2 2
1
3 38.37
[85.44; 38.27]
1
24.00
1
2
[30.29; 18.10]
[0.00; 14.00] [108.39; 12.00
14.00]
3
0.25
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
12.00
24.00
36.00
48.00
60.00
72.00
84.00
96.00
Slope stability analysis using Sarma method of polygon slip running under the 108.39
footing up to the base of slope in EQ condition Kh =0.25g
Results (Stage of construction 3)

Analysis 1 (stage 3)
Polygonal slip surface
Coordinates of slip surface points [m]
x z x z x z x z x z
28.17 16.82 28.82 16.79 41.20 17.05 48.72 17.80 54.33 19.39
59.44 21.69 71.33 29.45 76.07 32.38 81.59 35.05 88.23 38.31
88.24 38.33
Segments restricting slip surface
Numbe First point Second point
r x [m] z [m] x [m] z [m]
1 27.00 15.91 39.52 16.64
2 39.52 16.43 54.54 18.52
3 54.75 18.31 67.59 21.23
4 67.59 21.23 78.13 23.95
5 78.02 24.05 89.50 27.70
6 89.50 27.70 99.20 30.83
7 99.20 30.94 102.85 34.38
8 102.85 34.38 104.32 37.82
11
Sanju K. jain
Slope stability verification (Sarma)

Description : Slope Stability Analysis at Section 3 using Sarma method on polygon slip surface for EQ
condition after building Construction
3111.34
2115.11
1244.35
10 2
11
1 38.37
93
8 [88.24;
[88.23; 38.33]
38.31]
7 [81.59; 35.05] 32.00
1
[76.07; 32.38]
[71.33; 29.45]
6 24.00
[0.00; 23.44] 5 [108.39; 23.44]
12 3 4
[59.44; 21.69]
2
[54.33; 19.39] 16.00
[28.17; [41.20; [48.72;
[28.82;16.82]
16.79] 17.05] 17.80]
3 8.00
0.25
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
8.00
16.00
24.00
32.00
40.00
48.00
56.00
64.00
72.00
80.00
88.00
96.00
104.00
108.39
Rigid bodies
Numbe 
Name Sample
r [kN/m3]
1 Ø600mm-20m long Anchor Pile 24.50
Slope stability analysis using Sarma method of polygon slip running under the
footing up to the base of slope in EQ condition Kh =0.25g with Ø600-20m long RCC
bored pile
x z x z x z x z x z
27.34 16.12 32.74 16.25 43.93 17.05 54.02 18.46 54.95 18.57
59.63 19.86 71.42 24.78 76.18 27.44 83.96 32.58 88.23 38.31
88.24 38.33
Factor of safety = 1.69 > 1.50
Slope stability ACCEPTABLE
12
Sanju K. jain
Description: Slope Stability analysis using Sarma polygon slip method at section 3 for EQ condition after
building construction with Ø600-20m long RCC bored pile
3111.34
2115.11
1244.35
10
11 2
1 38.37
3
9 [88.24; 38.31]
[88.23; 38.33]
32.00
8 [83.96; 32.58]
7
[76.18; 27.44] 24.00
6 [71.42; 24.78]
45
1 2 3
[59.63; 19.86]
[54.95;18.46]
[54.02; 18.57] 16.00
[32.74;
[27.34; [43.93; 17.05]
16.12]16.25]
8.00
0.25
0.00
-5.00
0.00
8.00
16.00
24.00
32.00
40.00
48.00
56.00
64.00
72.00
80.00
88.00
96.00
104.00
108.39
13
Slope Stability Analysis at Section 4
Sanju K. jain I

Project
Task : Slope Stability Analysis at Section 4
Part : I
Description : Kanti Bal Hospital
User : Sanju. K. jain
Author : Sanju K. jain
Date : 9/1/2018
Interface
Interface location
r x z x z x z
0.00 15.00 0.20 14.95 5.76 15.45
11.27 15.96 12.82 15.97 15.60 16.06
19.35 16.60 27.25 15.79 27.67 15.89
28.07 15.88 28.64 15.87 28.97 16.47
29.08 16.41 29.44 16.48 30.09 16.76
32.28 18.71 34.86 20.06 35.79 20.39
36.02 20.68 36.14 20.72 36.28 20.74
40.84 20.80 40.88 20.72 41.96 20.98
42.41 22.43 43.01 22.45 43.07 22.66
43.26 22.54 45.87 23.71 45.88 23.72
45.95 23.84 46.80 24.17 48.60 25.16
50.54 25.93 51.44 26.31 52.30 26.84
53.74 27.67 56.25 29.15 56.48 29.30
57.25 29.40 57.41 29.42 57.54 29.44
1
57.69 29.56 59.72 31.22 61.24 32.19
61.52 32.34 62.30 32.90 64.34 34.35
64.73 34.49 65.30 35.48 66.58 36.79
66.74 37.33 66.94 37.34 67.38 37.57
69.24 37.95 69.69 38.10 71.49 38.46
72.89 38.47 75.28 38.42 78.78 38.48
80.81 38.49 81.54 38.48 84.35 38.46
87.69 38.49 88.19 38.53 89.69 38.65
90.43 38.69 94.92 38.59 95.16 38.58
97.32 38.59 99.36 38.46 99.70 38.44
101.93 38.43 109.03 38.42 112.18 38.24
112.42 38.19 119.24 37.98 120.18 37.96
120.62 37.95
45.87 23.71 120.62 23.71
1
Sanju K. jain I

Interface location
r x z x z x z
0.00 14.00 120.62 14.00
0.00 0.00 120.62 0.00

Numbe ef cef 
Name Pattern
r [°] [kPa] [kN/m3]
1 Silt~Sand~Clay 30.00 5.00 17.00

Numbe sat s n
Name Pattern
r [kN/m3] [kN/m3] [–]
Soil parameters
Silt~Sand~Clay
2
Sanju K. jain I

Surface position
r x z x z soil
120.62 23.71 120.62 37.95
Silt~Sand~Clay
120.18 37.96 119.24 37.98
112.42 38.19 112.18 38.24
109.03 38.42 101.93 38.43
99.70 38.44 99.36 38.46
97.32 38.59 95.16 38.58
94.92 38.59 90.43 38.69
89.69 38.65 88.19 38.53
87.69 38.49 84.35 38.46
81.54 38.48 80.81 38.49
78.78 38.48 75.28 38.42
72.89 38.47 71.49 38.46
69.69 38.10 69.24 37.95
1 67.38 37.57 66.94 37.34
66.74 37.33 66.58 36.79
65.30 35.48 64.73 34.49
64.34 34.35 62.30 32.90
61.52 32.34 61.24 32.19
59.72 31.22 57.69 29.56
57.54 29.44 57.41 29.42
57.25 29.40 56.48 29.30
56.25 29.15 53.74 27.67
52.30 26.84 51.44 26.31
50.54 25.93 48.60 25.16
46.80 24.17 45.95 23.84
45.88 23.72 45.87 23.71
120.62 14.00 120.62 23.71

Silt~Sand~Clay
45.87 23.71 43.26 22.54
43.07 22.66 43.01 22.45
42.41 22.43 41.96 20.98
40.88 20.72 40.84 20.80
36.28 20.74 36.14 20.72
36.02 20.68 35.79 20.39
34.86 20.06 32.28 18.71
2 30.09 16.76 29.44 16.48
29.08 16.41 28.97 16.47
28.64 15.87 28.07 15.88
27.67 15.89 27.25 15.79
19.35 16.60 15.60 16.06
12.82 15.97 11.27 15.96
5.76 15.45 0.20 14.95
0.00 15.00 0.00 14.00
3
Sanju K. jain I

Surface position
r x z x z soil
120.62 0.00 120.62 14.00
Silt~Sand~Clay
0.00 14.00 0.00 0.00
3
0.00 0.00 0.00 -5.00

Silt~Sand~Clay
120.62 -5.00 120.62 0.00
4
Water
Water type : GWT
GWT location
r x z x z x z
0.00 23.71 45.87 23.71 120.62 23.71
Analysis settings
Slope Stability Analysis Result using Bishop method for Static Condition before
Building Construction stage
x= 39.86 [m] 1 = 2.04 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 58.80 [m] 2 = 57.66 [°]
Radius : R= 38.03 [m]

4
Sanju K. jain I

Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Bishop method at Section 4 for Static Condition before
[39.86; 58.80]
2
38.69
[71.99; 38.46]
33.00
1
1
[0.00; 23.71] [45.87; 23.71] [120.62; 22.00
23.71]
2
[41.21; 20.79]
11.00
3
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
11.00
22.00
33.00
44.00
55.00
66.00
77.00
88.00
99.00
110.00
120.62
Slope Stability Analysis Result using Fellenius/Petterson method for Static Condition
before Building Construction stage
x= 45.40 [m] 1 = -9.54 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 48.19 [m] 2 = 69.45 [°]
Radius : R= 27.78 [m]

5
Sanju K. jain I

Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Fellenius/Petterson method at Section 4 for Static Condition
[45.40; 48.19]
2
38.69
[71.41; 38.44]
1
27.00
1
[0.00; 23.71] [45.87; 23.71] [120.62; 23.71]
2 18.00
[40.80; 20.79]
9.00
3
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
9.00
18.00
27.00
36.00
45.00
54.00
63.00
72.00
81.00
90.00
99.00
108.00
117.00
120.62
Slope Stability Analysis Result using Spencer method for Static Condition before
Building Construction stage
x= 39.58 [m] 1 = 2.52 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 59.33 [m] 2 = 57.23 [°]
Radius : R= 38.56 [m]
6
Sanju K. jain I
Name : Kanti Bal Hospital [39.58; 59.33] Section - analysis : 4 - 4

Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Spencer method at Section 4 for Static Condition before
2
38.69
[72.00; 38.46]
33.00
1
1
[0.00; 23.71] [45.87; 23.71] [120.62; 22.00
23.71]
2
[41.28; 20.81]
11.00
3
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
11.00
22.00
33.00
44.00
55.00
66.00
77.00
88.00
99.00
110.00
120.62
Slope Stability Analysis Result using Bishop method for EQ Condition Kh=0.25g
x= 39.51 [m] 1 = 2.44 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 59.94 [m] 2 = 56.77 [°]
Radius : R= 39.19 [m]

7
Sanju K. jain I

Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Bishop method at Section 4 for EQ Condition before building
Construction
2
38.69
[72.29; 38.46]
33.00
1
1
[0.00; 23.71] [45.87; 23.71] [120.62; 22.00
23.71]
2
[41.18; 20.79]
11.00
3
0.25
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
11.00
22.00
33.00
44.00
55.00
66.00
77.00
88.00
99.00
110.00
120.62
Slope Stability Analysis Result using Fellenius/Petterson method for EQ Condition
Kh=0.25g before Building Construction stage
x= 37.53 [m] 1 = -16.36 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 51.23 [m] 2 = 69.77 [°]
Radius : R= 36.93 [m]

8
Sanju K. jain I

Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Fellenius/Petterson method at Section 4 for EQ Condition
before building Construction [37.53; 51.23]
2
38.69
[72.18; 38.46]
1 30.00
[0.00; 23.71] [45.87; 23.71] [120.62; 20.00

23.71]
1 2
[27.13; 15.80]
10.00
3
0.25
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
110.00
120.62
Slope Stability Analysis Result using Spencer method for EQ Condition Kh=0.25g
x= 20.47 [m] 1 = -7.38 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 85.27 [m] 2 = 47.96 [°]
Radius : R= 69.89 [m]
9
[20.47; 85.27] Slope Stability Analysis at Section 4
Sanju K. jain I
Name : Kanti Bal Hospital Section - analysis :4 - 4

Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Spencer method at Section 4 for EQ Condition before building
Construction
2
38.69
[72.38; 38.47]
1 30.00
[0.00; 1
23.71] [45.87; 23.71] 2 [120.62; 23.71]
15.00
[11.49; 15.96]
3 0.25
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
15.00
30.00
45.00
60.00
75.00
90.00
105.00
120.62
Input data (After Building Construction Stage)
Surcharge
Num Surcharge / / / Slope Magnitude
Type
ber new Column No z [m] x [m] l [m] b [m]  [°] F, KN q2 unit
1 Yes Column No-34 concentrated z = 38.50 x = 78.10 l = 3.50 b = 3.25 1244.35 kN
Inputs of Polygon slip surface (After Building Construction Stage)

x z x z x z x z x z
32.83 19.00 46.24 17.10 52.93 17.67 59.66 19.67 66.29 23.28
74.52 29.43 83.73 34.14 92.36 37.54 95.10 38.57 95.12 38.58
r x [m] z [m] x [m] z [m]
1 27.00 16.00 51.00 17.00
2 51.00 17.00 85.00 23.00
3 85.00 23.00 106.00 39.00
Slope Stability Analysis using Sarma polygon slip failure method for Static condition
after building construction
10
Sanju K. jain I

Description : Slope Stability Analysis at Section 4 using Sarma method of Polygon failure plane for Static
condition after building Construction.
3111.34
3057.24
2158.09
2115.11
1244.35
3 4
2 5
1 8 9
10
38.69
7
[95.10;
[95.12;
[92.36; 38.57]
38.58]
37.54]
6
[83.73; 34.14]
5 [74.52; 29.43] 27.00
1 4
[0.00; 23.71] [45.87;
2 323.71]
[66.29; 23.28] [120.62; 23.71]
18.00
[32.83; 19.00] [59.66; 19.67]
[46.24;[52.93;
17.10]17.67]
9.00
0.00
-5.00
0.00
9.00
18.00
27.00
36.00
45.00
54.00
63.00
72.00
81.00
90.00
99.00
108.00
117.00
120.62
Slope Stability Analysis using Sarma polygon slip failure method for EQ condition
Kh=0.25g after building construction
11
Sanju K. jain I
Name : Kanti Bal Hospital Stage - analysis : 4 - 4

Description : Slope Stability Analysis at Section 4 using Sarma method of Polygon failure plane for EQ
condition Kh=0.25g after building Construction.
3111.34
3057.24
2158.09
2115.11
1244.35
3 4
2 8 9
10 5
1
38.69
7
[95.10;
[95.12;
[90.30; 38.57]
38.58]
38.24]
6
[81.32; 34.00]
5 [75.04; 30.45] 27.00
4
[0.00; 23.71] 2 3 23.71]
[45.87; [64.81; 23.52] [120.62; 23.71]
1
[58.55; 20.34] 18.00
[52.23; 18.25]
[30.12; 16.79] [46.14; 17.19]
9.00
0.25
0.00
-5.00
0.00
9.00
18.00
27.00
36.00
45.00
54.00
63.00
72.00
81.00
90.00
99.00
108.00
117.00
120.62
Slope Stability Analysis using Sarma polygon slip failure method for EQ condition
Kh=0.25g after building construction with Ø600mm -20m long bored RCC pile
Inputs of Polygon slip surface (After Building Construction Stage)

x z x z x z x z x z
30.12 16.79 49.13 17.19 52.23 17.26 61.71 18.94 66.97 20.06
75.27 24.49 82.92 27.29 89.34 29.87 95.10 38.57 95.12 38.58
r x [m] z [m] x [m] z [m]
1 27.00 16.00 51.00 17.00
2 51.00 17.00 85.00 23.00
3 85.00 23.00 106.00 39.00
12
Sanju K. jain I

Description : Slope Stability Analysis at Section 4 using Sarma method to check Anchor pile of Ø600mm-
20m long pile for EQ condition after building construction.
3111.34
3057.24
2158.09
2115.11
1244.35
3 4
2 9
10 5
1
38.69
[95.10;
[95.12; 38.57]
38.58]
8
7
6 [89.34; 29.87] 27.00
5 [82.92; 27.29]
[0.00; 23.71] [45.87; 4 [75.27; 24.49]
1 2 3 23.71] [120.62; 23.71]
[66.97; 20.06] 18.00
[61.71; 18.94]
[30.12; 16.79] [52.23;
[49.13; 17.26]
17.19]
9.00
0.25
0.00
-5.00
0.00
9.00
18.00
27.00
36.00
45.00
54.00
63.00
72.00
81.00
90.00
99.00
108.00
117.00
120.62
13
Sanju k. Jain
I
Slope stability analysis for Section 5-5
Project
Date : 9/1/2018
Interface
Interface location
r x z x z x z
0.00 15.00 5.54 15.61 9.20 16.11
9.60 16.11 10.94 16.33 17.52 17.25
22.54 17.87 28.87 18.50 29.21 18.50
29.40 18.57 30.17 18.66 33.38 19.20
35.30 19.57 35.76 19.67 36.47 19.93
37.68 20.92 38.41 21.93 39.15 22.08
41.24 23.13 43.74 24.24 44.70 24.68
45.20 24.87 47.86 26.01 49.28 26.64
49.92 26.83 52.32 28.17 52.98 28.48
54.99 29.73 55.56 30.14 56.17 30.51
56.33 30.61 56.68 30.81 57.89 31.57
58.43 31.63 58.76 31.66 59.47 32.38
1
60.62 33.37 61.66 33.87 62.66 35.17
63.11 35.27 65.49 37.09 66.76 37.15
68.68 37.77 68.93 37.87 69.01 37.90
69.13 37.92 72.07 38.11 73.75 38.23
76.97 38.31 77.55 38.29 79.70 38.35
79.89 38.35 80.25 38.35 82.60 38.36
83.09 38.34 84.99 38.33 86.48 38.40
88.22 38.33 90.11 38.24 90.57 38.23
91.36 38.19 97.38 38.22 98.80 38.22
99.83 38.19 105.58 38.21 110.32 38.05
113.97 38.03 118.43 37.90
41.24 23.13 118.43 23.13
0.00 14.00 118.43 14.00
0.00 0.00 118.43 0.00
1
Sanju k. Jain
I
Numbe ef cef 
Name Pattern
r [°] [kPa] [kN/m3]
1 Silt~Sand~clay 30.00 5.00 17.00

Numbe sat s n
Name Pattern
r [kN/m3] [kN/m3] [–]
1 Silt~Sand~clay 17.00
Soil parameters
Silt~Sand~clay
Surface position
r x z x z soil
118.43 23.13 118.43 37.90
Silt~Sand~clay
113.97 38.03 110.32 38.05
105.58 38.21 99.83 38.19
98.80 38.22 97.38 38.22
91.36 38.19 90.57 38.23
90.11 38.24 88.22 38.33
86.48 38.40 84.99 38.33
83.09 38.34 82.60 38.36
80.25 38.35 79.89 38.35
79.70 38.35 77.55 38.29
76.97 38.31 73.75 38.23
72.07 38.11 69.13 37.92
69.01 37.90 68.93 37.87
1 68.68 37.77 66.76 37.15
65.49 37.09 63.11 35.27
62.66 35.17 61.66 33.87
60.62 33.37 59.47 32.38
58.76 31.66 58.43 31.63
57.89 31.57 56.68 30.81
56.33 30.61 56.17 30.51
55.56 30.14 54.99 29.73
52.98 28.48 52.32 28.17
49.92 26.83 49.28 26.64
47.86 26.01 45.20 24.87
44.70 24.68 43.74 24.24
41.24 23.13
2
Sanju k. Jain
I
Surface position
r x z x z soil
118.43 14.00 118.43 23.13
Silt~Sand!clay
41.24 23.13 39.15 22.08
38.41 21.93 37.68 20.92
36.47 19.93 35.76 19.67
35.30 19.57 33.38 19.20
30.17 18.66 29.40 18.57
2
29.21 18.50 28.87 18.50
22.54 17.87 17.52 17.25
10.94 16.33 9.60 16.11
9.20 16.11 5.54 15.61
0.00 15.00 0.00 14.00
118.43 0.00 118.43 14.00

Silt~Sand!clay
0.00 14.00 0.00 0.00
3
0.00 0.00 0.00 -5.00

Silt~Sand!clay
118.43 -5.00 118.43 0.00
4
Water
Water type : GWT
GWT location
r x z x z x z
0.00 23.13 41.24 23.13 118.43 23.13
Analysis settings
Slope Stability Analysis using Bishop method at Section 5 for Static condition before

x= 36.11 [m] 1 = -3.19 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 59.18 [m] 2 = 57.93 [°]
Radius : R= 39.95 [m]
3
Sanju k. Jain
I


[36.11; 59.18]
Name : Kanti bal Hospital Section - analysis : 5-5
Description : Slope Stability analysis using Bishop method for Static condition before building
construction
2
38.40
[69.96; 37.97]
27.00
1
[0.00; 23.13] [41.24; 23.13] [118.43; 23.13]
18.00
[33.89; 19.29]
9.00
0.00
-5.00
0.00
9.00
18.00
27.00
36.00
45.00
54.00
63.00
72.00
81.00
90.00
99.00
108.00
118.43
Slope Stability Analysis using Fellenius/Petterson method at Section 5 for Static

condition before building Construction
x= 40.45 [m] 1 = -16.07 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 48.51 [m] 2 = 69.88 [°]
Radius : R= 30.76 [m]

4
Sanju k. Jain
I
Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Fellenius/ Petterson method at section 5 for Static condition
before building construction [40.45; 48.51]
2
38.40
[69.33; 37.93]
27.00
1
[0.00; 23.13] [41.24; 23.13] [118.43; 23.13]
18.00
[31.94; 18.95]
9.00
0.00
-5.00
0.00
9.00
18.00
27.00
36.00
45.00
54.00
63.00
72.00
81.00
90.00
99.00
108.00
118.43
Slope Stability Analysis using Spencer method at Section 5 for Static condition
x= 35.43 [m] 1 = -1.01 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 60.77 [m] 2 = 56.51 [°]
Radius : R= 41.33 [m]
5
Sanju k. Jain
I
[35.43; 60.77]
2
38.40
[69.90; 37.96]
27.00
1
[0.00; 23.13] [41.24; 23.13] [118.43; 23.13]
18.00
[34.70; 19.45]
9.00
0.00
-5.00
0.00
9.00
18.00
27.00
36.00
45.00
54.00
63.00
72.00
81.00
90.00
99.00
108.00
118.43
Slope Stability Analysis using Bishop method at Section 5 for EQ condition using
Kh=0.25g before building Construction

x= 35.35 [m] 1 = -8.84 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 57.80 [m] 2 = 60.07 [°]
Radius : R= 39.77 [m]
6
Sanju k. Jain
I
Name : Kanti bal Hospital [35.35; 57.80] Section - analysis : 5-5
Description : Slope Stability analysis using Bishop method for Static condition before building
construction
2
38.40
[69.82; 37.96]
27.00
1
[0.00; 23.13] [41.24; 23.13] [118.43; 23.13]
18.00
[29.24; 18.50]
9.00
0.25
0.00
-5.00
0.00
9.00
18.00
27.00
36.00
45.00
54.00
63.00
72.00
81.00
90.00
99.00
108.00
118.43
Slope Stability Analysis using Fellenius/Petterson method at Section 5 for EQ
condition Kh=0.25g before building Construction
x= 37.68 [m] 1 = -23.67 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 48.88 [m] 2 = 71.06 [°]
Radius : R= 33.69 [m]

7
Sanju k. Jain
I
Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Fellenius/ Petterson method at section 5 for Static condition
before building construction [37.68; 48.88]
2
38.40
[69.55; 37.94]
27.00
[0.00; 23.13] 1 [41.24; 23.13] [118.43; 23.13]

18.00
[24.15; 18.02]
9.00
0.25
0.00
-5.00
0.00
9.00
18.00
27.00
36.00
45.00
54.00
63.00
72.00
81.00
90.00
99.00
108.00
118.43
Slope Stability Analysis using Spencer method at Section 5 for EQ condition using
Kh=0.25g before building Construction
x= 8.25 [m] 1 = -4.50 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 105.66 [m] 2 = 41.57 [°]
Radius : R= 90.82 [m]

8
Sanju k. Jain
I
2
38.40
[68.51; 37.71]
30.00
1
[0.00; 23.13] [41.24; 23.13] [118.43; 23.13]
15.00
[1.12; 15.12]
0.25
0.00
-5.00
0.00
15.00
30.00
45.00
60.00
75.00
90.00
105.00
118.43
Input data (Building Construction Point loads)
Surcharge
Numbe
[m] [m] [m] [m]
Surcharges
Numbe
Name
r
1 Column No 25
2 Column No 41
3 Column No 68
4 Column No 64
Optimization Result of Slip plane for Polygonal slip surface using Spencer method
x z x z x z x z x z
35.71 19.66 44.94 19.74 47.64 19.82 57.24 21.99 71.22 29.84
84.97 37.94 95.28 38.11 97.58 37.64 98.09 38.22
9
Sanju k. Jain
I
Boundary Segments Restraints for Optimization of Slip plane for Polygonal slip
surface

r x [m] z [m] x [m] z [m]
1 35.30 19.57 47.30 19.78
2 47.30 19.78 62.28 21.38
3 62.28 21.45 72.60 23.13
4 72.67 22.99 82.21 25.84
5 82.21 25.84 90.51 28.49
6 90.51 28.49 96.78 32.19
7 96.78 32.19 100.89 37.90
Slope Stability Analysis using Spencer method at Section 5 for Static condition after

Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Spencer method on polygon slip surface at Section 5 for
Static condition after building Construction
3067.42
2371.77
1795.86
1345.54
2
1 6 3 7 489
38.40
[98.09;
[95.28;
[84.97; 37.94] 38.22]
38.11]
[97.58; 37.64]
5
[71.22; 29.84] 27.00

4
1 2 3
[0.00; 23.13] [41.24; 23.13] [118.43; 23.13]
[57.24; 21.99] 18.00
[47.64;
[44.94;
[35.71; 19.66] 19.82]
19.74]
9.00
0.00
-5.00
18.00
27.00
36.00
45.00
54.00
63.00
72.00
81.00
90.00
99.00
0.00
9.00
108.00
118.43
10
Sanju k. Jain
I
Optimization Result of Slip plane for Polygonal slip surface using Sarma method
x z x z x z x z x z
35.71 19.66 44.94 19.74 47.64 19.82 56.97 21.99 71.05 29.84
84.97 37.94 95.28 38.11 97.58 37.72 98.06 38.22
Slope Stability Analysis using Sarma method at Section 5 for Static condition after


Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Sarma method on polygon slip surface at Section 5 for Static
condition after building construction
3067.42
2371.77
1795.86
1345.54
2 3
1 6 7 489
38.40
[98.06;
[95.28;
[84.97; 37.94] 38.22]
38.11]
[97.58; 37.72]
5
[71.05; 29.84] 27.00

4
1 2 3
[0.00; 23.13] [41.24; 23.13] [118.43; 23.13]
[56.97; 21.99] 18.00
[47.64;
[44.94;
[35.71; 19.66] 19.82]
19.74]
9.00
0.00
-5.00
0.00
9.00
18.00
27.00
36.00
45.00
54.00
63.00
72.00
81.00
90.00
99.00
108.00
118.43
Optimization Result of Slip plane for Polygonal slip surface using Sarma method for
EQ condition
x z x z x z x z x z
35.77 19.67 48.28 20.26 53.61 21.35 59.09 23.29 70.01 28.87
76.23 31.98 89.07 37.98 89.61 38.26
11
Sanju k. Jain
I
Slope Stability Analysis using Sarma method at Section 5 for EQ condition using
Kh=0.25g after building Construction
Name : Kanti Bal hospital Section - analysis : 5 - 5

Description : Slope Stability Analysis at Section 5 using Sarma method for polygon slip surface for EQ
condition after building condition.
3067.42
2371.77
1795.86
1345.54
2 378
1 4
38.40
6 [89.61; 37.98]
[89.07; 38.26]
5
[76.23; 31.98]
4 [70.01; 28.87] 27.00
2 3
1
[0.00; 23.13] [41.24; 23.13] [59.09; 23.29] [118.43; 23.13]
[53.61;
[48.28; 21.35]
20.26] 18.00
[35.77; 19.67]
9.00
0.25
0.00
-5.00
18.00
27.00
36.00
45.00
54.00
63.00
72.00
81.00
90.00
99.00
108.00
118.43
0.00
9.00
Slope Stability Analysis using Sarma method at Section 5 for EQ condition using
Kh=0.25g after building Construction after assigning RCC piles as rigid bodies
Rigid bodies
Numbe 
Name Sample
r [kN/m3]
1 Ø600mm-20m long Anchor Pile 24.50
12
Sanju k. Jain
I
Optimization Result of Slip plane for Polygonal slip surface using Sarma method for
EQ condition Kh=0.25g and RCC pile Ø600mm-20m long
x z x z x z x z x z
35.77 19.67 51.29 20.26 57.63 20.94 69.69 23.44 82.81 29.77
87.57 30.71 89.56 33.00 91.22 35.81 92.35 38.00 92.36 38.19


Description : Slope Stability Analysis at Section 5 using Sarma method for polygon slip surface for EQ
condition using Kh=0.25g and RCC pile Ø600mm-20m long after building condition.
3067.42
2371.77
1795.86
1345.54
2 3
1 10 4
9
8 38.40
7 [92.35;
[92.36; 38.00]
38.19]
5 6 [91.22; 35.81]
[89.56; 33.00]
[87.57;
[82.81; 30.71]
29.77] 27.00
4
2 3
1
[0.00; 23.13] [41.24; 23.13] [69.69; 23.44] [118.43; 23.13]
[57.63; 20.94] 18.00
[35.77; 19.67] [51.29; 20.26]
9.00
0.25
0.00
-5.00
18.00
27.00
36.00
45.00
54.00
63.00
72.00
81.00
90.00
99.00
0.00
9.00
108.00
118.43
13
Kanti Bal Hospital
I
Slope stability analysis @ Section 6-6

Project
Part : I
Description : Slope Stability Analysis at Section 6
User : Sanju K. Jain
Date : 9/2/2018
Interface
Interface location
r x z x z x z
0.00 15.00 6.05 16.16 13.07 17.01
18.42 16.58 21.06 15.97 21.68 16.26
24.04 18.27 28.44 19.37 28.74 19.56
31.31 21.36 32.05 21.60 32.41 21.54
35.21 21.63 37.08 21.47 37.24 21.52
37.44 21.67 39.20 23.06 40.50 23.75
42.23 24.77 43.69 25.69 44.68 26.12
47.87 27.73 49.30 28.66 52.79 31.06
55.32 33.07 56.41 33.90 58.05 34.79
1 58.47 34.90 59.40 35.53 59.54 35.55
61.31 35.82 62.33 36.18 63.06 36.57
63.83 37.04 63.95 37.23 64.07 37.33
64.17 37.40 64.46 37.42 65.95 37.32
66.24 37.30 68.24 37.15 71.49 37.17
71.98 37.19 73.52 37.19 78.81 37.44
79.75 37.39 80.18 37.38 82.32 37.30
86.67 37.28 92.33 37.17 95.65 37.20
99.74 37.29 107.77 36.94
39.20 23.06 107.77 23.06
0.00 14.00 107.77 14.00
0.00 0.00 107.77 0.00
1
Kanti Bal Hospital
I
Numbe ef cef 

Name Pattern
r [°] [kPa] [kN/m3]
1 Silt~sand~clay 30.00 5.00 17.00

Numbe sat s n
Name Pattern
r [kN/m3] [kN/m3] [–]
1 Silt~sand~clay 17.00
Soil parameters
Silt~sand~clay

Surface position
r x z x z soil
107.77 23.06 107.77 36.94
Silt~sand~clay
99.74 37.29 95.65 37.20
92.33 37.17 86.67 37.28
82.32 37.30 80.18 37.38
79.75 37.39 78.81 37.44
73.52 37.19 71.98 37.19
71.49 37.17 68.24 37.15
66.24 37.30 65.95 37.32
64.46 37.42 64.17 37.40
64.07 37.33 63.95 37.23
1
63.83 37.04 63.06 36.57
62.33 36.18 61.31 35.82
59.54 35.55 59.40 35.53
58.47 34.90 58.05 34.79
56.41 33.90 55.32 33.07
52.79 31.06 49.30 28.66
47.87 27.73 44.68 26.12
43.69 25.69 42.23 24.77
40.50 23.75 39.20 23.06
2
Kanti Bal Hospital
I

Surface position
r x z x z soil
107.77 14.00 107.77 23.06
Silt~sand~clay
39.20 23.06 37.44 21.67
37.24 21.52 37.08 21.47
35.21 21.63 32.41 21.54
32.05 21.60 31.31 21.36
2 28.74 19.56 28.44 19.37
24.04 18.27 21.68 16.26
21.06 15.97 18.42 16.58
13.07 17.01 6.05 16.16
0.00 15.00 0.00 14.00
107.77 0.00 107.77 14.00

Silt~sand~clay
0.00 14.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 -5.00

Silt~sand~clay
107.77 -5.00 107.77 0.00
Water
Water type : GWT
GWT location
r x z x z x z
0.00 23.06 39.20 23.06 107.77 23.06
Analysis settings
Slope Stability analysis using Bishop method at Static Condition before building
Construction Stage.
Analysis 1
x= 34.89 [m] 1 = 4.08 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 53.19 [m] 2 = 57.05 [°]
Radius : R= 31.78 [m]
3
Kanti Bal Hospital
I

r x [m] z [m] x [m] z [m]
1 21.68 16.26 30.98 16.48
2 30.82 16.48 42.42 17.42
3 42.42 17.42 53.38 18.83
4 53.38 18.83 62.24 20.32
5 62.24 20.32 69.52 21.81
6 69.52 21.81 73.83 24.24
7 73.83 24.24 77.67 27.14
8 77.67 27.14 81.35 30.11
9 81.35 30.11 85.81 33.64
10 85.81 33.64 88.87 37.16
11 63.01 35.87 64.12 35.80
12 64.12 35.80 65.10 36.44
13 65.10 36.44 65.77 37.37

[34.85; 52.91]
Description : Slope Stability Analysis using bishop method at Section 6 at Static Condition before
2
37.44
[61.29; 35.81] 32.00

1
1 24.00
[0.00; 23.06] [39.20; 23.06] [107.77; 23.06]
[37.24; 21.51] 2
16.00
3 8.00
0.00
4
-5.00
16.00
24.00
32.00
40.00
48.00
56.00
64.00
72.00
80.00
88.00
96.00
0.00
8.00
104.00
107.77
Slope Stability analysis using Fellenius/Petterson method at Static Condition before

4
Kanti Bal Hospital
I
building Construction Stage.

Analysis 2
x= 39.64 [m] 1 = -6.98 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 43.80 [m] 2 = 68.93 [°]
Radius : R= 22.48 [m]


Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Fellenius / Petterson Method at Static condition before
building construction
[39.64; 43.80]
2
37.44
[60.62; 35.72] 32.00

1
1 24.00
[0.00; 23.06] [39.20; 23.06] [107.77; 23.06]
[36.91; 21.49] 2
16.00
3 8.00
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
8.00
16.00
24.00
32.00
40.00
48.00
56.00
64.00
72.00
80.00
88.00
96.00
104.00
107.77
Slope Stability analysis using Spencer method at Static Condition before building
Construction Stage.
5
Kanti Bal Hospital
I
Analysis 3
x= 34.85 [m] 1 = 4.36 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 52.91 [m] 2 = 57.11 [°]
Radius : R= 31.49 [m]

Description : Slope Stability analysis using Spencer method at Static condition before building
construction stage
[34.85; 52.91]
2
37.44
[61.29; 35.81] 32.00

1
1 24.00
[0.00; 23.06] [39.20; 23.06] [107.77; 23.06]
[37.24; 21.51] 2
16.00
3 8.00
0.00
4
-5.00
16.00
24.00
32.00
40.00
48.00
56.00
64.00
72.00
80.00
88.00
96.00
104.00
107.77
0.00
8.00
Slope Stability analysis using Bishop method at EQ Condition before building

Construction Stage.
Earthquake
Horizontal seismic coefficient : Kh = 0.25
Vertical seismic coefficient : Kv = 0.00
Analysis 1
x= 28.98 [m] 1 = -20.63 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 90.16 [m] 2 = 48.68 [°]
Radius : R= 80.16 [m]
6
Kanti Bal Hospital
I
[28.98; 90.16]


Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Bishop method at section 6 at EQ condition before building
Construction
2
37.44
[89.18; 37.23]
32.00
1
24.00
[0.00; 23.06] [39.20; 23.06] [107.77; 23.06]
1 2
16.00
[0.74; 15.14]
3 8.00
0.25
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
8.00
104.00
107.77
16.00
24.00
32.00
40.00
48.00
56.00
64.00
72.00
80.00
88.00
96.00
Slope Stability analysis using Fellenius/Petterson method at EQ Condition before

building Construction Stage.
Analysis 2
x= 28.98 [m] 1 = -20.63 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 90.16 [m] 2 = 48.68 [°]
Radius : R= 80.16 [m]
7
[28.98; 90.16]
Kanti Bal Hospital

I


Description : Slope Stability Analysis using Fellenius/ Petterson method at EQ condition before building
construction
2
37.44
[89.18; 37.23]
32.00
1
24.00
[0.00; 23.06] [39.20; 23.06] [107.77; 23.06]
1 2
16.00
[0.74; 15.14]
3 8.00
0.25
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
8.00
16.00
24.00
32.00
40.00
48.00
56.00
64.00
72.00
80.00
88.00
96.00
104.00
107.77
Slope Stability analysis using Spencer method at EQ Condition before building
Construction Stage.
Analysis 3
x= 27.48 [m] 1 = -17.50 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 99.43 [m] 2 = 45.23 [°]
Radius : R= 88.34 [m]
8
Kanti Bal Hospital
I

Description : Slope Stability analysis at Section 6 using Spencer method at EQ condition before building
construction
2
37.44
[90.20; 37.22]
32.00
1
24.00
[0.00; 23.06] [39.20; 23.06] [107.77; 23.06]
1 2
16.00
[0.92; 15.18]
3 8.00
0.25
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
8.00
16.00
24.00
32.00
40.00
48.00
56.00
64.00
72.00
80.00
88.00
96.00
104.00
107.77
Slope Stability analysis using Sarma method using Polygon slip surface running
beneath Footing up to bottom of Slope at Static Condition after building Construction
Stage.
Analysis 1
x z x z x z x z x z
22.00 16.53 41.06 17.73 45.94 19.09 50.64 21.30 55.30 24.53
62.31 30.78 68.34 36.84 71.71 37.14 77.23 37.29 82.54 37.21
83.44 37.29
r x [m] z [m] x [m] z [m]
1 21.68 16.26 30.98 16.48
2 30.82 16.48 42.42 17.42
3 42.42 17.42 53.38 18.83
4 53.38 18.83 62.24 20.32
5 62.24 20.32 69.52 21.81
6 69.52 21.81 73.83 24.24
7 73.83 24.24 77.67 27.14
8 77.67 27.14 81.35 30.11
9 81.35 30.11 85.81 33.64
10 85.81 33.64 88.87 37.16
9
Kanti Bal Hospital
I

Description : Slope Stability analysis using Sarma method at section 6 with polygonal slip surface
running beneath the building footing up to base of slope in Static Condition
2371.77
1664.19
1519.87
1014.26
2
3 4
1 7 8 9 11
10
37.44
6 [77.23;
[71.71;
[68.34; [83.44;
37.14]
36.84] 37.29]37.21]
[82.54; 37.29]
32.00
1
5 [62.31; 30.78]
4 24.00
[0.00; 23.06] [39.20; 323.06] [55.30; 24.53] [107.77; 23.06]
2
1 [50.64; 21.30] 2
[45.94; 19.09] 16.00
[41.06; 17.73]
[22.00; 16.53]
3 8.00
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
8.00
16.00
24.00
32.00
40.00
48.00
56.00
64.00
72.00
80.00
88.00
96.00
104.00
107.77
Slope Stability analysis using Spencer method using Circular slip surface running
beneath Footing up to bottom of Slope at EQ Condition Kh=0.25g after building
Construction Stage.
Analysis 2
x z x z x z x z x z
22.00 16.53 41.06 17.77 45.89 19.09 50.73 21.30 55.37 24.53
62.26 30.78 68.00 36.84 71.71 37.14 77.23 37.29 82.54 37.21
83.44 37.29
10
[16.12; 86.56]
Kanti Bal Hospital

I

Description : Slope Stability analysis using spencer method at section 6 with polygonal slip surface
running beneath the building footing up to base of slope in EQ Condition
2371.77
1664.19
1519.87
1014.26
2
2 3 4
1
37.44
[66.86; 37.25]
32.00
1
24.00
[0.00; 23.06] [39.20; 23.06] [107.77; 23.06]
1 2
16.00
[21.09; 15.98]
3 8.00
0.25
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
8.00
16.00
24.00
32.00
40.00
48.00
56.00
64.00
72.00
80.00
88.00
96.00
104.00
107.77
Slope Stability analysis to Calculate FOS and Slip surface running beneath Footing
up to bottom of Slope at EQ Condition after introduction of Ø600mm -24m long RCC
Pile.
Rigid bodies
Numbe 
Name Sample
r [kN/m3]
1 Ø600mm-24m long Pile 24.50
Slope Stability analysis using Sarma method using polygonal slip surface running
beneath Footing up to bottom of Slope at EQ Condition after introduction of Ø600mm
-24m long RCC Pile.
Analysis 1
x z x z x z x z x z
3.17 15.61 21.77 7.25 29.04 5.45 40.26 4.50 44.72 5.00
49.48 6.37 53.81 8.58 57.97 11.78 62.85 16.94 67.58 19.18
73.90 21.82 100.26 37.27
11
Kanti Bal Hospital
I

r x [m] z [m] x [m] z [m]
1 0.05 14.97 5.46 12.65
2 5.48 12.76 12.50 8.00
3 12.37 8.00 18.39 3.99
4 18.39 3.99 25.03 1.29
5 25.03 1.29 31.42 -0.21
6 31.42 -0.21 42.08 -0.21
7 42.08 -0.21 50.79 1.29
8 50.85 1.29 58.49 3.55
9 58.49 3.55 67.71 7.68
10 67.72 7.74 75.43 13.49
11 75.43 13.37 84.49 20.10
12 84.49 20.10 90.61 24.87
13 90.61 24.87 97.34 30.87
14 97.34 30.87 103.34 37.24

Description : Slope Stability analysis using Sarma method at section 6 with polygonal slip surface
running beneath the building footing up to base of slope in EQ Condition after introduction of Ø600mm -
24m long RCC Pile.
2371.77
1664.19
1519.87
1014.26
2
3 4 12
1
37.44
[100.26; 37.27]
3
2 1 11
10 24.00
1
[0.00; 23.06] [39.20; 23.06] 9 [107.77; 23.06]
4 [73.90; 21.82]
8 [67.58; 19.18]
[3.17; 15.61]2 7 [62.85; 16.94] 12.00
3 6
4 5 [57.97; 11.78]
5
0.25
[53.81; 8.58]
[21.77; 7.25] [49.48; 6.37]
[29.04; [40.26;
5.45]
[44.72; 5.00]
4.50] 0.00
6
-5.00
0.00
12.00
24.00
36.00
48.00
60.00
72.00
84.00
96.00
107.77
Slope Stability analysis using Sarma method using Circular slip surface running
beneath Footing up to bottom of Slope at EQ Condition after introduction of Ø600mm
-24m long RCC Pile.
Analysis 2
12
Kanti Bal Hospital
I

x= 34.23 [m] 1 = -19.68 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 73.88 [m] 2 = 52.77 [°]
Radius : R= 60.47 [m]
r x [m] z [m] x [m] z [m]
1 0.05 14.97 5.46 12.65
2 5.48 12.76 12.50 8.00
3 12.37 8.00 18.39 3.99
4 18.39 3.99 25.03 1.29
5 25.03 1.29 31.42 -0.21
6 31.42 -0.21 42.08 -0.21
7 42.08 -0.21 50.79 1.29
8 50.85 1.29 58.49 3.55
9 58.49 3.55 67.71 7.68
10 67.72 7.74 75.43 13.49
11 75.43 13.37 84.49 20.10
12 84.49 20.10 90.61 24.87
13 90.61 24.87 97.34 30.87
14 97.34 30.87 103.34 37.24

[34.23; 73.88]
Description : Slope Stability analysis using Spencer method at section 6 with Circular slip surface
running beneath the building footing up to base of slope in EQ Condition after introduction of Ø600mm -
24m long RCC Pile.
2371.77
1664.19
1519.87
1014.26
2
3 2 4
1
37.44
[82.38; 37.29]
32.00
3
2 1
24.00
[0.00; 23.06] [39.20; 23.06] [107.77; 23.06]
1
4
16.00
[13.87; 16.94]
5 8.00
0.25
0.00
6
-5.00
0.00
8.00
16.00
24.00
32.00
40.00
48.00
56.00
64.00
72.00
80.00
88.00
96.00
104.00
107.77
13
Project
Date : 9/6/2018
Interface
Interface location
r x z x z x z
0.00 15.00 4.19 15.74 6.05 16.16
13.07 17.01 18.42 16.58 21.06 15.97
21.68 16.26 24.04 18.27 28.44 19.37
31.14 21.22 32.05 21.60 35.21 21.63
37.08 21.47 37.44 21.67 39.20 23.06
40.50 23.75 42.23 24.77 43.69 25.69
44.68 26.12 47.87 27.73 49.30 28.66
1 51.35 30.09 52.79 31.06 55.32 33.07
56.41 33.90 57.98 34.74 58.47 34.90
59.40 35.53 62.24 35.78 64.46 37.42
66.73 37.25 67.55 37.17 68.24 37.16
73.52 37.19 78.79 37.36 80.16 37.35
82.32 37.30 86.67 37.28 92.33 37.17
95.65 37.20 99.74 37.29 107.69 36.93
39.20 23.06 107.69 23.06
0.00 14.00 107.69 14.00
0.00 0.00 107.69 0.00

Numbe ef cef 
Name Pattern
r [°] [kPa] [kN/m3]
1 Silt~snad~clay 30.00 5.00 17.00
1
Numbe sat s n
Name Pattern
r [kN/m3] [kN/m3] [–]
1 Silt~snad~clay 17.00
Soil parameters
Silt~snad~clay

Surface position
r x z x z soil
107.69 23.06 107.69 36.93
Silt~snad~clay
99.74 37.29 95.65 37.20
92.33 37.17 86.67 37.28
82.32 37.30 80.16 37.35
78.79 37.36 73.52 37.19
68.24 37.16 67.55 37.17
66.73 37.25 64.46 37.42
62.24 35.78 59.40 35.53
1
58.47 34.90 57.98 34.74
56.41 33.90 55.32 33.07
52.79 31.06 51.35 30.09
49.30 28.66 47.87 27.73
44.68 26.12 43.69 25.69
42.23 24.77 40.50 23.75
39.20 23.06
107.69 14.00 107.69 23.06

Silt~snad~clay
39.20 23.06 37.44 21.67
37.08 21.47 35.21 21.63
32.05 21.60 31.14 21.22
28.44 19.37 24.04 18.27
2
21.68 16.26 21.06 15.97
18.42 16.58 13.07 17.01
6.05 16.16 4.19 15.74
0.00 15.00 0.00 14.00
107.69 0.00 107.69 14.00

Silt~snad~clay
0.00 14.00 0.00 0.00
2
Surface position
r x z x z soil
0.00 0.00 0.00 -5.00
Silt~snad~clay
107.69 -5.00 107.69 0.00
Water
Water type : GWT
GWT location
r x z x z x z
0.00 23.06 39.20 23.06 107.69 23.06
Analysis settings
Slope stability analysis using Bishop method static condition before building
construction at Section 8
Analysis 1
x= 35.50 [m] 1 = 3.07 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 51.56 [m] 2 = 58.17 [°]
Radius : R= 30.12 [m]

3
Description : Slope Stability analysis [35.50;

at Section
51.56] 8 using Bishop method static condition
2
37.42
[61.09; 35.67]
1
27.00
1
[0.00; 23.06] [39.20; 23.06] [107.69; 23.06]
[37.11; 21.48] 2 18.00
9.00
3
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
9.00
18.00
27.00
36.00
45.00
54.00
63.00
72.00
81.00
90.00
99.00
107.69
Slope stability analysis using Fellenius/ Petterson method static condition before
building construction at Section 8
Analysis 2
x= 39.48 [m] 1 = -6.81 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 44.18 [m] 2 = 68.05 [°]
Radius : R= 22.84 [m]

Description : Slope Stability analysis section 8 Static condition using Fellenius/Petterson method before
building Construction [39.48; 44.18]
2
37.42
[60.66; 35.64] 32.00

1
1 24.00
[0.00; 23.06] [39.20; 23.06] [107.69; 23.06]
[36.77; 21.50] 2
16.00
3 8.00
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
8.00
16.00
24.00
32.00
40.00
48.00
56.00
64.00
72.00
80.00
88.00
96.00
104.00
107.69
4
Slope stability analysis using Spencer method static condition before building
Analysis 3
x= 34.90 [m] 1 = 4.00 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 52.90 [m] 2 = 56.89 [°]
Radius : R= 31.50 [m]

Description : Slope Stability analysis section 8 using Spencer method before building construction
2
37.42
[61.29; 35.69] 32.00

1
1 24.00
[0.00; 23.06] [39.20; 23.06] [107.69; 23.06]
[37.10; 21.48] 2
16.00
3 8.00
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
8.00
16.00
24.00
32.00
40.00
48.00
56.00
64.00
72.00
80.00
88.00
96.00
104.00
107.69
Slope stability analysis using Bishop method EQ condition Kh=0.25g before building
Analysis 1
x= 33.50 [m] 1 = 6.03 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 55.95 [m] 2 = 54.28 [°]
Radius : R= 34.65 [m]

5
[33.50; 55.95]
Description : Slope Stability analysis at Section 8 using Bishop method static condition before building
Construction
2
37.42
[61.63; 35.72]
1
27.00
1
[0.00; 23.06] [39.20; 23.06] [107.69; 23.06]
[37.14; 21.49] 2 18.00
9.00
3
0.25
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
9.00
18.00
27.00
36.00
45.00
54.00
63.00
72.00
81.00
90.00
99.00
107.69
Slope stability analysis using Fellenius/Petterson method EQ condition kh=0.25g
before building construction at Section 8
Analysis 2
x= 38.50 [m] 1 = -6.53 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 45.25 [m] 2 = 66.13 [°]
Radius : R= 23.82 [m]


Description : Slope Stability analysis section 8 Static condition using Fellenius/Petterson method before
building Construction [38.50; 45.25]
2
37.42
[60.28; 35.61]
1
27.00
1
[0.00; 23.06] [39.20; 23.06] [107.69; 23.06]
[35.79; 21.58] 2 18.00
9.00
3
0.25
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
9.00
18.00
27.00
36.00
45.00
54.00
63.00
72.00
81.00
90.00
99.00
107.69
6
Slope stability analysis using Spencer method EQ condition kh=0.25g before building
Analysis 3
x= 22.03 [m] 1 = -0.98 [°]
Center : Angles :
z= 67.73 [m] 2 = 52.99 [°]
Radius : R= 51.73 [m]
Factor of safety = 0.68 < 1.50 [22.03; 67.73]

Description : Slope Stability analysis section 8 using Spencer method before building construction
2
37.42
[63.34; 36.59]
32.00
1
24.00
[0.00; 23.06] [39.20; 23.06] [107.69; 23.06]
1 2
16.00
[21.15; 16.01]
3 8.00
0.25
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
8.00
16.00
24.00
32.00
40.00
48.00
56.00
64.00
72.00
80.00
88.00
96.00
104.00
107.69
Slope stability analysis using Sarma method static condition using polygon slip
surface running under the footing to base of slope at Section 8
(Stage of construction 2)
Surcharge
Numbe
[m] [m] [m] [m]
1 No No concentrated z = 37.00 x = 78.62 l = 1.60 b = 1.60 137.64 kN
Surcharges
Numbe
Name
r
1 Column No 87
x z x z x z x z x z
20.45 16.11 20.70 16.03 22.17 15.68 28.99 15.97 41.43 16.97
45.56 18.07 49.84 19.85 53.96 22.31 62.27 28.99 67.41 33.39
69.89 34.95 72.03 35.98 74.51 37.12 74.71 37.23
7
r x [m] z [m] x [m] z [m]
1 0.00 15.00 9.89 9.93
2 9.89 9.93 19.63 6.47
3 19.63 6.47 31.68 5.70
4 31.68 5.70 44.38 7.37
5 44.38 7.37 55.91 10.83
6 55.91 10.83 71.04 17.62
7 71.04 17.62 77.07 22.88
8 77.07 22.88 82.58 29.42
9 82.58 29.42 85.79 37.24

Description : Slope Stability analysis at Section 8 using polygonal slip surface running beneath the
building footing up to base of slope using Sarma method for static condition
137.64
1
14
1213
1011
37.42
9 [74.71;
[74.51; 37.23]
37.12]
1[72.03;
[69.89;
[67.41;
35.98]
34.95]
33.39]
8
7 [62.27; 28.99] 24.00
5 6
[0.00; 23.06] 1
23 4 [39.20; 23.06] 2 [107.69; 23.06]
[53.96; 22.31]
[49.84; 19.85]
[45.56; 18.07]
[41.43; 16.97]
[20.45;
[20.70;
[22.17;16.11]
16.03]
[28.99; 15.97]
15.68] 12.00
3
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
12.00
24.00
36.00
48.00
60.00
72.00
84.00
96.00
107.69
Slope stability analysis using Spencer method static condition using polygon slip
surface running under the footing to base of slope at Section 8
x z x z x z x z x z
20.44 16.11 20.76 16.03 22.46 15.68 24.69 15.76 41.90 17.04
46.04 18.28 50.27 20.23 54.13 22.83 61.08 29.21 65.95 34.31
68.42 36.85 68.99 37.02 74.21 37.21 74.71 37.23
8
Description : Slope Stability analysis section 8 using polygonal slip surface running from base of footing
to the base of slope using Spencer method
137.64
1
14
12 13
11
10 37.42
9 [74.21;
[74.71;
[68.99;
[68.42; 37.21]
37.23]
37.02]
36.85]
1
[65.95; 34.31]
8
7 [61.08; 29.21] 24.00
[0.00; 23.06] 1
23 4 5 6 23.06]
[39.20; [107.69; 23.06]
[54.13; 22.83]
2
[50.27; 20.23]
[46.04;
[41.90; 18.28]
17.04]
[20.44;
[20.76;
[22.46;16.11]
16.03]
[24.69; 15.76]
15.68] 12.00
3
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
12.00
24.00
36.00
48.00
60.00
72.00
84.00
96.00
107.69
Slope stability analysis using Sarma method EQ condition Kh=0.25g using polygon
slip surface running under the footing to base of slope at Section 8
x z x z x z x z x z
0.66 15.12 13.05 13.94 21.77 13.09 22.15 13.07 26.92 13.02
28.49 13.04 29.32 13.09 37.07 13.69 39.99 14.01 42.87 14.55
47.14 15.75 51.04 17.27 54.85 19.24 59.55 22.35 62.92 24.83
68.26 29.02 71.77 31.61 74.87 33.75 78.62 35.97 80.16 37.18
80.46 37.34

building footing up to base of slope using Sarma method for EQ condition
137.64
1
21
20
19
18 37.42
17
16 [80.46;35.97]
[80.16;
[78.62; 37.34]
37.18]
15 1 [74.87; 33.75]
14 [71.77; 31.61]
13 [68.26; 29.02] 24.00
12
1123.06] [62.92; 24.83]
[0.00;
1 23.06] [39.20; [107.69; 23.06]
2 3
4 567 8 9 10 2 22.35]
[59.55;
[54.85; 19.24]
[51.04;
[47.14; 17.27]
15.75] 12.00
[0.66; 15.12]
[13.05; 13.94] [42.87;
[39.99;
[37.07; 14.55]
14.01]
13.69]
[21.77;
[22.15;
[29.32;
13.09]
13.07]
[26.92;
[28.49; 13.09]
13.02]
13.04]
3
0.25
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
12.00
24.00
36.00
48.00
60.00
72.00
84.00
96.00
107.69
Slope stability analysis using Spencer method EQ condition Kh=0.25g using polygon
slip surface running under the footing to base of slope at Section 8
9
x z x z x z x z x z
0.66 15.12 17.04 15.69 22.28 14.03 23.15 13.84 26.76 13.55
29.19 13.42 29.51 13.43 39.15 13.95 40.60 14.14 43.09 14.78
46.91 16.42 50.08 18.31 53.09 20.73 55.24 22.91 61.54 30.42
66.74 36.75 67.49 37.14 77.84 37.16 78.62 36.99 79.02 37.25
79.51 37.35

to the base of slope using Spencer method
137.64
1
17
16 21
20
18
19
37.42
15
[66.74; [79.51;37.16]
[79.02;
[67.49;[77.84;
37.14]
[78.62;
36.75] 37.35]
37.25]
36.99]
1
14 [61.54; 30.42]
13 24.00
12
[0.00;
1 2
23.06] [39.20;1123.06] [107.69; 23.06]
34 5 6
7 89 10 [55.24; 22.91]
2
[53.09; 20.73]
[50.08; 18.31]
[17.04;
[0.66; 15.12] 15.69] [46.91;
[43.09; 16.42]
14.78] 12.00
[22.28;
[23.15; [40.60;
14.03]
[39.15;
13.84]
[26.76;
[29.19;
[29.51;13.55]
13.42] 14.14]
13.43]13.95]
3
0.25
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
12.00
24.00
36.00
48.00
60.00
72.00
84.00
96.00
107.69
Slope stability analysis using Sarma method EQ condition Kh=0.25g using polygon
slip surface running under the footing to base of slope at Section 8 with soil anchors
@ 1m c/c both ways
Input data (Stage of construction 3)

Anchors
Elastic
Length and slope / Anchor Diamete Break
Anchor Origin modulu Active Force
coordinates spacing r / area force
Numbe s
r in
post- l [m] / x d [mm] /
new x [m] z [m]  [°] / z [m] b [m] E [MPa] Fc [kN] compre F [kN]
stressed [m] A [mm2]
ss.
1 Yes 20.00 16.22 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
2 Yes 21.00 15.98 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
3 Yes 22.00 16.53 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
4 Yes 23.00 17.38 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
5 Yes 24.00 18.24 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
6 Yes 25.00 18.51 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
7 Yes 26.00 18.76 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
8 Yes 27.00 19.01 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
9 Yes 28.00 19.26 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
10 Yes 19.00 16.45 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
11 Yes 18.00 16.61 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
10
Elastic
Numbe s
r in
post- l [m] / x d [mm] /
new x [m] z [m]  [°] / z [m] b [m] E [MPa] Fc [kN] compre F [kN]
stressed [m] A [mm2]
ss.
12 Yes 29.00 19.75 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
13 Yes 30.00 20.44 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
14 Yes 31.00 21.12 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
15 Yes 32.00 21.58 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
16 Yes 33.00 21.61 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
17 Yes 34.00 21.62 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
18 Yes 35.00 21.63 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
19 Yes 36.00 21.56 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
20 Yes 37.00 21.48 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
21 Yes 38.00 22.11 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
22 Yes 39.00 22.90 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
23 Yes 40.00 23.48 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
24 Yes 41.00 24.04 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
25 Yes 42.00 24.63 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
26 Yes 43.00 25.26 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
27 Yes 44.00 25.82 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
28 Yes 45.00 26.28 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
29 Yes 46.00 26.79 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
30 Yes 47.00 27.29 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
31 Yes 48.00 27.81 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
32 Yes 49.00 28.46 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
33 Yes 50.00 29.15 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
34 Yes 51.00 29.85 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
35 Yes 52.00 30.53 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
36 Yes 53.00 31.23 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
37 Yes 54.00 32.02 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
38 Yes 55.00 32.82 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
39 Yes 56.00 33.59 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
40 Yes 57.00 34.22 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
41 Yes 58.00 34.75 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
42 Yes 59.00 35.26 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
43 Yes 60.00 35.58 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
44 Yes 61.00 35.67 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
45 Yes 62.00 35.76 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
46 Yes 63.00 36.34 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
47 Yes 64.00 37.08 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
48 Yes 65.00 37.38 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
49 Yes 66.00 37.30 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
50 Yes 67.00 37.22 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
51 Yes 68.00 37.16 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
Surcharge
Numbe
[m] [m] [m] [m]
Earthquake
Horizontal seismic coefficient : Kh = 0.25
11
Vertical seismic coefficient : Kv = 0.00
Analysis settings

x z x z x z x z x z
0.23 15.04 1.57 14.26 4.53 12.84 7.84 11.16 13.07 9.06
15.00 8.15 17.97 7.16 23.90 7.35 29.93 7.91 32.10 8.43
38.95 8.39 46.00 9.62 50.63 11.26 54.70 13.09 58.94 15.65
62.71 18.64 65.04 21.25 68.31 24.84 71.59 26.64 75.82 29.21
78.65 31.14 83.39 34.93 85.52 37.29
Alternative Solutions to prevent slope failure. The length of anchor shown below are length up to slip plane
and he bonded length starts after the showed length. In our case, Ultimate Pull of Anchor is 200KN for
which needs 5m bonded length beyond slip plane.
Lengths of anchors w.r. to slip surface (infinite anchors assumed)

Spacing of Soil anchors = 1m c/c both ways
Anchor Length [m] Ultimate Pull Anchor Length [m] Ultimate Pull
Strength, KN Strength, KN
1 10.11 200 27 16.08 200
2 9.76 200 28 16.09 200
3 10.26 200 29 16.14 200
4 11.09 200 30 16.14 200
5 11.92 200 31 16.07 200
6 11.95 200 32 16.11 200
7 11.96 200 33 16.18 200
8 12.22 200 34 16.23 200
9 12.52 200 35 16.14 200
10 10.47 200 36 16.07 200
11 10.72 200 37 16.07 200
12 13.10 200 38 16.00 200
13 13.90 200 39 15.75 200
14 14.70 200 40 15.41 200
15 15.11 200 41 15.00 200
16 14.96 200 42 14.59 200
17 14.78 200 43 14.04 200
18 14.61 200 44 13.33 200
19 14.36 200 45 12.61 200
20 14.08 200 46 12.64 200
21 14.57 200 47 12.81 200
22 15.11 200 48 12.59 200
23 15.33 200 49 12.02 200
24 15.53 200 50 11.43 200
25 15.75 200 51 10.86 200
26 15.98 200
12
building footing up to base of slope using Sarma method for EQ condition using Soil anchor @1m c/c
both ways
137.64
1
23
22
37.42
21
20 [85.52; 37.29]
119
18 [83.39; 34.93]
17 [78.65; 31.14]
[75.82; 29.21] 24.00
16 [71.59; 26.64]
[0.00;
12 23.06] [39.20; 23.06]15 [68.31; 24.84] [107.69; 23.06]
3 14 2
[65.04; 21.25]
4 12 13 [62.71; 18.64]
56
[0.23;
[1.57; 7 8 9 10 11
15.04]
14.26] [58.94; 15.65] 12.00
[4.53; 12.84] [54.70; 13.09]
[7.84; 11.16] 3
[50.63;
[46.00; 11.26]
9.62]
[13.07;
[15.00; 9.06][32.10;
8.15]
[29.93; 8.43]
[38.95;
7.91] 8.39] 0.25
[23.90;
[17.97; 7.35]
7.16]
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
12.00
24.00
36.00
48.00
60.00
72.00
84.00
96.00
107.69
Slope stability analysis using Spencer method EQ condition Kh=0.25g using polygon
slip surface running under the footing to base of slope at Section 8 with soil anchors
@ 1m c/c both ways
Anchors
Elastic
Numbe s
r post- in
l [m] / x d [mm] /
new stresse x [m] z [m]  [°] / z [m] b [m] E [MPa] Fc [kN] compre F [kN]
[m] A [mm2]
d ss.
1 Yes 20.00 16.22 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
2 Yes 21.00 15.98 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
3 Yes 22.00 16.53 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
4 Yes 23.00 17.38 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
5 Yes 24.00 18.24 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
6 Yes 25.00 18.51 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
7 Yes 26.00 18.76 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
8 Yes 27.00 19.01 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
9 Yes 28.00 19.26 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
10 Yes 19.00 16.45 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
13
Elastic
Numbe s
r post- in
l [m] / x d [mm] /
new stresse x [m] z [m]  [°] / z [m] b [m] E [MPa] Fc [kN] compre F [kN]
[m] A [mm2]
d ss.
11 Yes 18.00 16.61 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
12 Yes 29.00 19.75 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
13 Yes 30.00 20.44 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
14 Yes 31.00 21.12 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
15 Yes 32.00 21.58 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
16 Yes 33.00 21.61 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
17 Yes 34.00 21.62 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
18 Yes 35.00 21.63 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
19 Yes 36.00 21.56 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
20 Yes 37.00 21.48 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
21 Yes 38.00 22.11 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
22 Yes 39.00 22.90 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
23 Yes 40.00 23.48 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
24 Yes 41.00 24.04 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
25 Yes 42.00 24.63 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
26 Yes 43.00 25.26 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
27 Yes 44.00 25.82 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
28 Yes 45.00 26.28 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
29 Yes 46.00 26.79 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
30 Yes 47.00 27.29 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
31 Yes 48.00 27.81 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
32 Yes 49.00 28.46 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
33 Yes 50.00 29.15 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
34 Yes 51.00 29.85 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
35 Yes 52.00 30.53 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
36 Yes 53.00 31.23 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
37 Yes 54.00 32.02 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
38 Yes 55.00 32.82 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
39 Yes 56.00 33.59 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
40 Yes 57.00 34.22 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
41 Yes 58.00 34.75 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
42 Yes 59.00 35.26 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
43 Yes 60.00 35.58 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
44 Yes 61.00 35.67 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
45 Yes 62.00 35.76 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
46 Yes 63.00 36.34 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
47 Yes 64.00 37.08 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
48 Yes 65.00 37.38 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
49 Yes 66.00 37.30 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
50 Yes 67.00 37.22 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
51 Yes 68.00 37.16 l = 25.00  = 60.00 1.00 d= No 200.00
Surcharge
Numbe
[m] [m] [m] [m]

14
x z x z x z x z x z
0.01 15.00 0.41 15.07 4.53 12.84 7.84 11.16 13.11 8.85
15.06 8.15 17.97 7.16 22.03 7.39 29.93 6.70 32.10 7.32
41.96 7.78 46.00 8.89 50.18 11.09 54.70 13.54 58.46 17.06
62.71 21.62 65.04 25.34 68.03 30.51 70.45 31.80 73.28 33.28
78.65 35.51 80.29 37.08 80.50 37.34
Alternative Solutions to prevent slope failure using Soil anchors. The length of anchor shown below are
length up to slip plane and he bonded length starts after the showed length. In our case, Ultimate Pull of
Anchor is 200KN for which needs 5m bonded length beyond slip plane.
Lengths of anchors w.r. to slip surface (infinite anchors assumed)

Spacing of Soil anchors = 1m c/c both ways
Anchor Length [m] Ultimate Pull Anchor Length [m] Ultimate Pull
Strength, KN Strength, KN
1 10.52 200 27 15.90 200
2 10.34 200 28 15.83 200
3 11.11 200 29 15.80 200
4 12.25 200 30 15.71 200
5 13.11 200 31 15.40 200
6 13.10 200 32 15.19 200
7 13.18 200 33 15.00 200
8 13.41 200 34 14.82 200
9 13.64 200 35 14.54 200
10 10.69 200 36 14.28 200
11 10.79 200 37 14.08 200
12 14.14 200 38 13.88 200
13 14.86 200 39 13.63 200
14 15.58 200 40 13.04 200
15 16.04 200 41 12.40 200
16 16.02 200 42 11.75 200
17 15.97 200 43 10.96 200
18 15.71 200 44 10.01 200
19 15.37 200 45 9.06 200
20 15.01 200 46 8.40 200
21 15.37 200 47 7.82 200
22 15.67 200 48 7.49 200
23 15.72 200 49 6.96 200
24 15.75 200 50 6.41 200
25 15.81 200 51 5.89 200
26 15.88 200
15
to the base of slope using Spencer method using soil anchor @1m c/c both ways
137.64
1
23
22
21
20 37.42
1819
[80.50; 37.08]
[80.29; 37.34]
1 [78.65;
17 [73.28; 33.28] 35.51]
[70.45;30.51]
16 [68.03; 31.80]
24.00
15 [65.04; 25.34]
[0.00;
12 23.06] [39.20; 23.06] 2 21.62] [107.69; 23.06]
3 14 [62.71;
4 13
56 11 12 [58.46; 17.06] 12.00
7 8
[0.41; 15.00]
[0.01; 15.07] 9 10
[4.53; 12.84] [54.70; 13.54]
[7.84; 11.16] 3
[50.18; 11.09]
[13.11;
[15.06;8.85]
8.15]
[22.03; [46.00;
[41.96;
7.39]6.70]
[32.10; 7.32] 8.89] 0.25
7.78]
[17.97; 7.16]
[29.93;
0.00
4
-5.00
0.00
12.00
24.00
36.00
48.00
60.00
72.00
84.00
96.00
107.69
16
ANNEXURE-2
DESIGN DRAWINGS OF THE SLOPE STAILITY ANALYSIS
19

Kanti Bal Hospital Slope Stability Analysis Rev Report Sept 20, 2018 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Kanti Bal Hospital Slope Stability Analysis Rev Report Sept 20, 2018 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SLOPE STABILITY VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS

Kanti Bal Hospital,Maharajgunj

GS G.S. Soil & Materials Engineers (P) Ltd

1. Ground water table

2. Ground water table including suction

3. Coefficient of pore pressure ru

Two options are available to account for anchors:

Coefficient of vertical earthquake Kv

Factor of horizontal acceleration Kh

M-C-S degree Horizontal acceleration Factor of horizontal acceleration

𝛾𝑆 𝑀𝑟𝑒𝑠 > 𝑀𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟

where: Movr - overturning moment

where: FS - factor of slope stability computed with reduced soil parameters

where: Movr - overturning moment

E - forces developed between slices

Each slice assumes contribution due to the following forces:

The solution adopts the following expressions:

1. The initial value of δ is set to zero δ = 0.

OPTIMIZATION OF POLYGONAL SLIP SURFACE

CHANGING INCLINATION OF DIVIDING PLANES

where: ui - pore pressure within slice

OPTIMIZATION OF CIRCULAR SLIP SURFACE

INFLUENCE OF TENSILE CRACKS

MODIFICATION/CHANGE OF SLOPE GEOMETRY

INTERNAL SLOPE REINFORCEMENT TO INCREASE THE INTERNAL FRICTION AND

Slope stability analysis

22.13 22.71 76.90 22.71

0.00 15.00 76.90 15.00

0.00 0.00 76.90 0.00

Soil parameters - effective stress state

1 Silt~Sand~Clay 30.00 5.00 17.00

Soil parameters - uplift

Assigning and surfaces

76.90 15.00 76.90 22.71

Numbe Coordinates of surface points [m] Assigned

0.00 0.00 0.00 -5.00

Name : Kanti Bal Hospital Section - analysis : 1 - 1

[26.71; 25.10] 22.00

[0.00; 15.00] [76.90; 15.00]

Factor of safety = 1.16 < 1.50

Name : Kanti Bal Hospital Section - analysis : 1 - 1

[26.48; 25.03] 22.00

[0.00; 15.00] [76.90; 15.00]

Factor of safety = 1.22 < 1.50

Name : Kanti Bal Hospital Section - analysis : 1 - 1

Description : Slope Stability Analysis at Section 1 using Bishop method

SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS IN EARTHQUAKE CONDITION

Factor of safety = 0.75 < 1.50

Slope Stability Analysis using Fellenius/Petterson method

Factor of safety = 0.82 < 1.50

Name : Kanti Bal Hospital Section - analysis : 1 - 1

Name : KantiBal Hospital Section - analysis : 1 - 1

[0.00; 15.00] [76.90; 15.00]

Slope stability analysis

43.29 24.24 96.22 24.24

0.00 15.00 96.22 15.00

Numbe Coordinates of interface points [m]

Soil parameters - effective stress state

1 Silt~Sand~Clay 30.00 5.00 17.00

Soil parameters - uplift

Assigning and surfaces

Numbe Coordinates of surface points [m] Assigned

96.22 0.00 96.22 15.00