Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ahfameri@gmail.com
By: Amirhamid Forough Ameri
February 2016
1
The Notional/Functional Syllabus
The notional/functional (N/F) syllabus:
Is the best known of contemporary language teaching syllabus types.
It is, however, also the object of a great deal of misunderstanding.
N/F is an "approach" (Brumfit & Johnson; N/F is closely associated with CLT,
1979; Widdowson, 1979) (Brumfit & Johnson; 1979; Richards
But it has never been described as &Rodgers, 1986; Widdowson, 1979)
anything other than a type of content of A rather amorphous view of language
language instruction that can be taught teaching, which is really a collection of
through a variety of classroom different approaches and procedures
techniques. clustered around notional/functional
2 content.
The Notional/Functional Syllabus
N/F grew out of a functionally-oriented linguistic tradition that has
long existed in Britain.
4
The Notional/Functional Syllabus
5
The Notional/Functional Syllabus
Notions or categories of meaning are what Wilkins (1978) has
called semanticogrammatical categories, which are usually
characterized by interaction between categories of meaning and
grammatical forms in most languages: time, duration, quantity,
agent, instrument, place, etc.
Functions or the uses to which language forms are put are
communicative purpose of language. Examples are agreement,
greeting, approval, prediction, requesting, directions, apologizing,
and so on.
6
The Notional/Functional Syllabus
Notional/functionalism is a procedure for designing a syllabus or choosing
content for a specific syllabus, but it is not a part of the content of the syllabus
itself.
The determination of what notions, functions, and forms to include in a
teaching syllabus is often regarded as part of notional/functionalism.
Two widely used series written using functions and notions as their
content are the In Touch and Lift Styles series, the former (a series
for beginning students) by Castro and Kimbrough (1980) and the
latter (an intermediate series) by Lozano and Sturtevant (1981).
10
Positive Characteristics
They will have more experience with, and knowledge about, which linguistic forms do
what in the new language, and they will have had exposure to at least some real or
simulated interaction in the language.
They may view the language less as an abstract system of elements and rules, and more
as a communicative system.
11
Negative Characteristics
Notional/functional syllabi that remain simple series of isolated form-function pairings will do
little to develop interactional and communicative ability because these isolated functions are not
synthesized into discourse.
Since the content is tied to specifics of use, the instruction is less generalizable than structural
content.
Like structural syllabi, functional content can be presented entirely in short utterances and units
of discourse. If the larger structures of discourse are ignored, the students may be unable to
handle the new language in longer, connected discourse.