Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Imposition of 20% senior citizen’s discount is a valid exercise of police power. The 20% discount is
intended to improve the welfare of senior citizens who, at their age, are less likely to be gainfully employed,
more prone to illnesses and other disabilities, and thus, in need of subsidy in purchasing basic commodities. It
is a price regulatory measure(Manila Memorial Park v. DSWD)
Coconut levy funds are considered as taxes. Market stall fees, universal charges under EPIRA Law, and
socialized housing tax do not constitute taxes. They are regulatory charges; these are imposed in the exercise
of police power.
Double Taxation
The Revenue Code of Manila imposed on a Tax on Wholesalers, Distributors, or Dealers and Tax on Retailers.
At the same time, the City of Manila imposed additional taxes on a person who sold goods and services in the
course of trade or business based on a certain percentage of his gross sales or receipts in the preceding
calendar year. Such is direct double taxation. (Nursery Care Corporation v. Acevedo)
The imposition of local business tax based on gross revenue will result in direct double taxation inasmuch
as the revenue or income for a taxable year will definitely include its gross receipts already reported during
the previous year and for which local business tax has already been paid. (Ericsson Telecommunications vs. City
of Pasig)
There is no direct double taxation on FWT on interest income and the 5% gross receipts tax paid by banks.
Tax Amnesty vs. Tax Exemption; Tax Evasion vs. Tax Avoidance; Taxpayer’s Suit vs. Citizen’s
Suit
Note: BIR cannot grant tax exemption. It is within the province of the Congress.
Can tax exemptions be revoked? GR: YES. Tax exemption is a mere privilege. (e.g., Franchise) XPN: If
exemption is contractual because it may violate the non-impairment clause.
Q: Is prior assessment a condition sine qua non for a criminal case of tax evasion?
A: NO. (1) The crime is complete when the taxpayer willfully and fraudulently files his tax return or
underpays his taxes.
(2) Section 205, NIRC, provides that civil and criminal actions may be filed simultaneously
(3) They differ as to purpose. The assessment seeks to determine tax liability while the criminal action seeks
to penalize the taxpayer.
A taxpayer’s suit requires that there be illegal or irregular disbursement of public funds derived from
taxation. In a citizen’s suit, the plaintiff/petitioner is but the mere instrument of the public concern.
INCOME TAX
Basic Principles
Only resident citizens (RC) and domestic corporations (DC) are subject to income tax on their
worldwide income.
Tax base:
Taxable income = Gross income – allowable deductions
XPN: NRANETBs and NRFCs – Taxed on gross income
Income vs. Capital: Income is any wealth which flows into the taxpayer other than a mere return of capital
while capital constitutes the investment which is the source of income.
Situs of Income
Share of a partner in a
commercial/business partnership is
subject to final tax. Share of a partner in a
general professional partnership is
subject to basic income tax.
Transactions involving capital Taxation of Capital Rules on Basic Income Tax Treatment
assets give rise to capital gains or Gains and Losses 1. Holding Period Rule
losses. GR: Subject to basic Long-term capital gains and losses
income tax (capital asset has been held for >1 year)
Two kinds of assets under NIRC: XPN: are only 50% recognized.
1. Ordinary Asset [SOUR]: Subject to final tax if gain (only for individuals)
- Stock in trade of the arose from:
taxpayer/inventory 1. Real property held as 2. Capital Loss Limitation Rule
- Property held for sale to capital asset in the Capital loss may only be deducted against
customers in the ordinary course Philippines (6% CGT) capital gain, not ordinary gain.
of trade or business; 2. Shares of stock of
- Property used in the trade or domestic corporations 3. Net Capital Loss Carryover Rule
business of character subject to sold directly through Net capital loss may be carried over to the
depreciation the buyer, not traded succeeding taxable year.
- Real property used in trade or through the LSE Note: Only 1 year for carryover. (Note:
business of the taxpayer. (5%/10% CGT, 15% Compare this with NOLCO which
2. Capital Asset – those that are under TRAIN) generally can be carried over for 3 years)
not ordinary assets (only for individuals)
In cases of expropriation, it is the seller who should shoulder the tax. The person whose property is
expropriated pays since it is a tax on the seller’s gain from the sale of the real estate. (Republic vs. Soriano)
Bad The debts are actually ascertained to be worthless or uncollectible despite diligent or earnest
Debts effort exerted by the taxpayer: [SCRA]
a. Sending of statement of accounts;
b. Sending of collection letters;
c. Referral to a lawyer for collection; and
d. Filing an action for collection in court.
Net Capital Loss Carry Over (NCLCO) vs Net Operating Loss Carry Over (NOLCO)
BASIS NCLCO NOLCO
Source Transactions involving capital asset Transactions involving ordinary asset
Who can avail Individual Individual and corporate taxpayer
Carryover of operating loss in 3 succeeding
Period of carry-
In the next succeeding taxable year taxable years or 5 years, in the case of mining
over
companies
Holding Period May apply Does not apply
Note: Minimum wage earners are exempt from income tax on their basic pay and HONHA (Holiday, overtime,
night shift differential, and hazard pay)
Taxability of PAGCOR
Exempt from income tax on income on gaming NOT exempt: income derived from other related
Extends to its lessees and contractees services
Exempt from VAT on receipts from gaming NOT exempt: legal obligation of withholding agent
operations
Administrative Provisions
Within 3 years from the filing of the ITR, the ITR may be amended provided that the taxpayer has not received
any letter of authority to investigate
Irrevocability Rule - applies only to the option of carry-over. A taxpayer is still free to change its choice after
electing a refund of its excess tax credit. But once it opts to carry over such excess creditable tax, after electing
refund or issuance of tax credit certificate, the carry-over option becomes irrevocable. Accordingly, the
previous choice of a claim for refund, even if subsequently pursued, may no longer be granted. Choice of refund
or tax credit certificate is not irrevocable. (University Physicians Services, Inc. v. CIR 2018).
When the donor makes his will within a short time of, or simultaneously with, the making of gifts, the gifts are
considered as having been made in contemplation of death subject to estate tax. (Roces v. Posadas)
Note: In estate taxation, the concept of revocability or irrevocability in the designation of the beneficiary is
necessary to determine whether the life insurance proceeds are included in the gross estate or not. However,
if the appointed beneficiary is the estate, executor or administrator, the proceeds shall be included from the
gross estate.
On the other hand, in income taxation, there is no need for the determination of revocability or irrevocability
of the beneficiary for purposes of exclusion of such proceeds from the gross income. They are non-taxable
regardless of who the recipient is.
Rule regarding transfer for less than adequate and full consideration:
GR: Where a property is transferred for less than adequate and full consideration in money or money’s worth,
the amount by which the FMV exceeds the consideration shall be deemed a gift and be included in
computing the amount of gifts made during the calendar year. Donative intent is not necessary.
XPN: Where property transferred is real property located in the Philippines considered as capital asset,
the transfer is not subject to donor’s tax but to a capital gains tax, which is a final income tax of 6% of the fair
market value or gross selling price, whichever is higher, and therefore, there can be no instance where the
seller can avoid any tax by selling his capital assets below its FMV.
Q: Are donations for political campaign purposes exempted from donor’s tax?
A: YES. Any contribution in cash or in kind to any candidate, political party, or coalition of parties for campaign
purposes, reported to COMELEC shall not be subject to payment of any gift tax.
Under the date-of-death valuation rule, claims existing at the time of death should be made the basis of
the determination of allowable deductions. Thus, post-death developments, such as condonotion in this
case, are not material in determining the amount of the deduction (Dizon, et. al v. CA)
VALUE-ADDED TAX
The seller of such transactions charges no output tax In VAT-exempt sales, the taxpayer/seller shall not
but can claim a refund or tax credit certificate for the bill any output tax on his sales to his customers and
input VAT attributable to zero-rated sales. corollarily, is not allowed any credit or refund of the
No VAT shall be shifted or passed-on by VAT- input taxes he paid on his purchases.
registered sellers or suppliers from the Customs
Territory on their sale, barter or exchange of goods,
properties or services to the subject registered
Freeport Zone enterprises.
Sale of residential house & lot and other residential dwellings by a non-dealer
Use in business (incidental transaction) VAT
Not use in business (regardless of amount) 6% CGT
Sale of real property classified as low cost housing VAT exempt
Sale of real property classified as socialized housing VAT exempt
* Apply rules on adjacent lots
** Apply rules on adjacent house and lots and other residential dwellings
Note: Parking lot is always subject to VAT, regardless of amount.
Q: Are gross receipts derived from sales of admission tickets in showing motion pictures subject to
VAT?
A: NO. The legislative intent is not to impose VAT on persons already covered by the amusement tax
Percentage Tax
Any person whose sales or receipts are exempt from the payment of 3% of gross quarterly sales or
value-added tax for not exceeding the VAT threshold and who is not a receipts
VAT-registered person
Sale, barter, exchange, or other disposition of shares of stock listed ½ of 1% of gross selling price
and traded through the local stock exchange other than the sale by a (now 60% of 1% under TRAIN)
dealer in securities
The fact that the Savings Account Plus (SAP) is evidenced by a passbook cannot remove its coverage from DST
on certificates of deposit. A document to be considered a certificate of deposit need not be in a specific form.
Thus, a passbook issued by a bank qualifies as a certificate of deposit drawing interest because it is considered
a written acknowledgement by a bank that it has accepted a deposit of a sum of money from a depositor.
(Prudential Bank v. CIR)
Excise Tax
- Sale to international carriers
Sale of Petroleum is
- Exempt entities under treaties
Exempt
- Clark Development Authority
TAX REMEDIES
Assessment
A final decision on disputed assessment that is declared void does not necessarily result in a void assessment.
The nullification of the FDDA does not extend to the nullification of the entire assessment. An FDDA that does
not inform the taxpayer in writing of the facts and law on which it is based renders the decision void. It is as if
there was no decision rendered. It is tantamount to a denial by inaction, which may still be appealed before
the CTA.
Compromise
Protest
NIRC Local taxes RPT CMTA
FLD/FAN. Protest may Notice of assessment Notice of Ruling or
be a request for issued by local treasurer. assessment decision of
Subject of
reinvestigation or issued by local Customs
protest
reconsideration. treasurer collector
30 days from receipt of 60 days from receipt of 30 days from 15 days from
Period to file FLD/FAN NOA. payment under payment
protest. under protest.
Not required Not required GR: Payment Required
under protest is
required.
XPN: [LIM]
Requirement - Lack of authority
of payment to collect
under protest - Illegality of
assessment
- Payment by
mistake (solutio
indebiti)
Before whom CIR or duly authorized Local Treasurer Local Treasurer Commissioner
filed representative (DAR)
Request for 60 days 60 days. 30 days.
reconsideration - 180
Period to
days from filing
decide
Request for
reinvestigation – 180
UST Law Bar Operations 2018
13 ACADEMICS COMMITTEE
TAXATION LAW
Refund
NIRC Local taxes RPT CMTA
2 years from payment, which is 2 years from the date of the 12 months from
the filing of the final adjustment payment of such tax, fee, or charge, the date of
return. (Sec. 229) or from the date the taxpayer is payment of
entitled to a refund or credit duties and taxes.
Period to file Note: For refund of unutilized
input VAT, period is 2 years
from the close of the taxable
quarter when the zero-rated
sale was made. (Sec. 112)
Doctrine of Not applicable Applicable
supervening
cause
Supervening causes refer to facts that transpire after judgment has become final and executory or to new
circumstances which developed after the judgment has acquired finality, including matters which the parties
were not aware of prior to or during the trial as they were not yet in existence at that time.
The proper party is the statutory taxpayer, the person on whom the tax is imposed by law and who paid the
tax even when he shifts the burden thereof to another.
Note: The withholding agent has the authority to file a claim for refund. Reason: “It is very difficult, indeed
conceptually impossible, to consider a person who is statutorily made "liable for tax" as not "subject to tax.”
(CIR v. Smart Communications, Inc., J. Del Castillo)
Period for BIR to decide on a protest is 180 days. There is no period provided for BIR to decide on a claim for
tax refund. However, the taxpayer must file a judicial claim within two years from payment or filing of final
adjustment return. For filing of tax refund under Sec. 112 (refund of unutilized input VAT attributable to zero-
rated sales, the period for BIR to decide is 120 days. (90 days under TRAIN.)
GR: The non-payment cannot be excused by supervening causes arising after the payment
XPN:
a. Assurance from the BIR that the suit or proceeding filed beyond the 2-year period shall still be accepted
by the BIR.
b. Agreement with the BIR to await the decision of the court.
4. Dissolved Corporation (BPI v. CIR) – Prescriptive period shall run 30 days after the approval by the SEC of
its plan for dissolution
Requisities for filing of refund under Sec. 112 [PRICE] (CIR v. Toledo Power Company)
1. Prescriptive period must be complied with
2. Registration – Taxpayer must be VAT-registered
3. Input tax must be the source of refund
4. Creditable input tax must not be applied against output VAT
5. Engaged in zero-rated transactions
Note: Under Section 112, upon the lapse of 120-day period, there is a deemed denial, and the taxpayer must
appeal within 30 days. Under the TRAIN Law, the period is shortened to 90 days, and it is silent as to whether
it is a deemed denial.
Other Matters
- CTA (not CA) has jurisdiction now on petitions of certiorari assailing interlocutory orders involving tax.
e.g., exclusive appellate jurisdiction over decision of Secretary of Justice on findings by the fiscal of
probable cause on criminal violations of CMTA is appealable to CTA, and not CA.
- Simultaneous running of delinquency and deficiency interest is allowed before TRAIN Law. Such has
been disallowed under TRAIN Law.
- CTA en banc cannot entertain a petition for annulment of judgment of CTA division. The divisions are
not considered separate and distinct courts but are divisions of one and the same court. The petition is
cognizable by SC.
- Dispute solely between BIR and another government agency, including GOCCs, is cognizable by Secretary of
Justice, Solicitor General, or Government Corporate Counsel, depending on the issues and the government
agencies involved. (PSALM v CIR)
Jurisdiction Taxes under NIRC: Less than or equal to P300K: MTC (P400K if Metro Manila)
for Tax P300K to P1M: RTC; P1M above: CTA
Collection Taxes under LGC: Less than or equal to P300K: MTC (P400K if Metro Manila)
Cases Above P300K, RTC
False Return Fraudulent Returns The Waiver of the Statute of Limitations should
Contains wrong Intentional and deceitful not be construed as a waiver of the right to invoke
information due to with the sole aim of the defense of prescription but rather an
mistake, carelessness or evading the correct tax agreement between the taxpayer and the BIR to
ignorance due extend the period to a date certain, within which
Does not make the Will make the taxpayer the latter could still assess or collect taxes due.
taxpayer criminally criminally liable The waiver does not mean that the taxpayer
liable relinquishes the right to invoke prescription
Not subject to 50% Subject to 50% penalty unequivocally. It must be strictly construed.
penalty surcharge surcharge
Prescriptive period for Prescriptive period is 10 The CIR cannot validly agree to reduce the
assessment is 3 years years from discovery of prescriptive period to less than that granted by
the filing of the falsified law because it would result to the detriment of the
or fraudulent return State. Such reduction diminishes the
Government’s opportunity to collect taxes
CTA has ample authority to issue injunctive writs to (Republic v. Lopez).
restrain the collection of tax and to even dispense with
the deposit of the amount claimed or the filing of the The taxpayer’s waiver of statute of limitation does
required bond, whenever the method employed by the not cover taxes already prescribed (Republic v.
CIR in the collection of tax jeopardizes the interests of Lim De Yu).
a taxpayer for being patently in violation of the law
GR: Compliance with RMO No. 20-90 or RDAO No.
05-01 is mandatory for validity of the waiver
XPN: Estoppel, in pari delicto doctrine
6. The waiver must be executed in three copies, the original copy to be attached to the docket of the case, the second
copy for the taxpayer and the third copy for the Office accepting the waiver.
Q: Does the CTA have jurisdiction over a special civil action for certiorari assailing an interlocutory
order issued by the RTC in a local tax case?
A: YES. A court may issue a writ of certiorari in aid of its appellate jurisdiction if said court has jurisdiction to
review, by appeal or writ of error, the final orders or decisions of the lower court (The City Of Manila v. Hon.
Grecia-Cuerdo, G.R. No. 175723, February 4, 2014).
The CTA may take cognizance of cases directly challenging the constitutionality or validity of a tax law or
regulation or administrative issuance. RA 9282, a special and later law than BP Blg. 129 provides an exception
to the original jurisdiction of the RTC over actions questioning the constitutionality or validity of tax laws or
regulations. Except for local tax cases, actions directly challenging the constitutionality or validity of a tax law
or regulation or administrative issuance may be filed directly before the CTA (BDO v. Secretary of Finance).
LOCAL TAXATION
Local Taxation
1. Income tax, except when levied on banks and other financial institutions;
2. Documentary stamp tax;
3. GR: Taxes on estates, inheritance, gifts, legacies and other acquisitions mortis causa, except as otherwise
provided under the LGC;
XPN: Tax on transfer of real property (Sec. 135, LGC)
4. Customs duties, registration fees of vessel and wharfage on wharves, tonnage dues, and all other kinds of
customs fees, charges and dues except wharfage on wharves constructed and maintained by the LGU
concerned;
5. Taxes, fees, and charges and other impositions upon goods carried into or out of, or passing through, the
territorial jurisdictions of LGUs in the guise of charges for wharfage, tolls for bridges or otherwise, or other
taxes, fees, or charges in any form whatsoever upon such goods or merchandise;
6. Taxes, fees, or charges on agricultural and aquatic products when sold by marginal farmers or fishermen;
7. Taxes on business enterprises certified to by the BOI as pioneer or non-pioneer for a period of six (6) and
four (4) years, respectively from the date of registration;
8. Excise taxes on articles enumerated under the NIRC, as amended, and taxes, fees, or charges on petroleum
products;
NOTE: LGUs are devoid of taxing power over the manufacturing and distribution of petroleum products per se
or even the activity or privilege related to the petroleum products, it is covered by the limitation under Sec.
133(h), LGC and thus, no levy can be imposed. Sec. 143(h) defines the general power of LGUs to tax businesses
within its jurisdiction. Thus, the omnibus grant of power to LGUs under Sec. 143(h) of the LGC cannot overcome
the specific exception or exemption in Sec. 133(h) of the same Code. (Batangas City v. Pilipinas Shell Petroleum
Corporation)
9. Percentage or VAT on sales, barters, or exchanges or similar transactions on goods or services except as
otherwise provided herein;
10. Taxes on the gross receipts of transportation contractors and persons engaged in the transportation of
passengers or freight by hire and common carriers by air, land, or water, except as provided in this Code;
11. Taxes on premiums paid by way or reinsurance or retrocession;
12. Taxes, fees, or charges for the registration of motor vehicles and for the issuance of all kinds of licenses or
permits for the driving thereof, except tricycles;
13. Taxes, fees, or other charges on Philippine products actually exported, except as otherwise provided in the
LGC (i.e. Sec. 143(c), LGC- municipalities may impose taxes on exporters);
14. Taxes, fees, or charges, on Countryside and Barangay Business Enterprises and duly registered
cooperatives
15. Taxes, fees or charges of any kind on the National Government, its agencies and instrumentalities, and
LGUs
Professional Tax
NOTE: TAX TO BE PAID ONLY ONCE. Person who has paid the corresponding professional tax shall be
entitled to practice his profession in any part of the Philippines without being subjected to any other
national or local tax, license, or fee for the practice of such profession.
Q: Quezon City passed an ordinance which contains a proviso: “The parcels of land sold after the
effectivity of this revision shall be subject to RPT based on the actual amount reflected in the deed of
conveyance or the current approved zonal valuation of the BIR prevailing at the time of the sale,
cession, transfer, and conveyance, whoever is higher, as evidenced by the certificate of payment of the
capital gains tax issued therefore.” Is the said proviso valid?
A: NO. The said proviso mandates an exclusive rule in determining the fair market value and departs from the
established procedures such as sales analysis approach, the income capitalization approach and reproduction
cost approach under the rules implementing the statute. It unduly interferes with the duties statutorily placed
upon the local assessor by completely dispensing with his analysis and discretion which the LGC and the
regulations require to be exercised. (Allied Banking Corporation v Quezon City)
Importation
The carrying vessel or aircraft enters the Philippine territory with the intention to unload
Begins
therein.
(a) The duties, taxes and other charges due upon the goods have been paid or secured to be
paid at the port of entry unless the goods are free from duties, taxes and other charges and
Terminated legal permit for withdrawal has been granted; or
(b) In case the goods are deemed free of duties, taxes and other charges, the goods have
legally left the jurisdiction of the Bureau.
Abandonment
Abandonment - renunciation by an importer of all his interests and property rights in the importer article.
Goods are forfeited in favor of the government.
Express Abandonment - When the owner, importer, or consignee of the imported goods expressly signifies
in writing to the District Collector the intention to abandon the same
Implied Abandonment
1. When the owner, importer, consignee, or interested party after due notice, fails to file the goods
declaration within 15 days (subject to extension of 15 days)
2. Having filed such goods declaration, the owner, importer, consignee or interested party after due notice,
fails to pay the assessed duties, taxes and other charges thereon within 15 days from the date of final
assessment; or
3. Having paid the assessed duties, taxes and other charges, the owner, importer or consignee or interested
party after due notice, fails to claim the goods within 30 days from payment
Smuggling