L E A R N I N G A N D D E V E L O P M E N T

MONITORING & EVALUATION REPORT

SEMINAR-WORKSHOP FOR GRADE 10
Program Title : STUDENTS ON RESEARCH PLANNING AND
CONSTRUCTION
Program Proponent/s, RAQUEL FLORIAN M. DARAUAY
:
Designation Teacher III
Lamo National High School
School/District :
District I
March 8-9, 2019
Date and Venue :
Appunan Hall, Lamo National High School
Zoraida L. Bullecer
Harry Billy Nino M. Salem
Marivic C. Somera
Facilitators/Speakers :
Shairuz Caesar B. Dugay
Raquel Florian M. Darauay
Zaldy E. Romero

Monitoring and Evaluation (M & E) Analysis

Results of the facilitator/session review of the program (QAME Form D)

Session - Facilitator Evaluation

3.596

3.600

3.550 3.478

3.500

3.450
3.360
3.400

3.350

3.300

3.250

3.200
SESSION FACILITATOR AVERAGE
 The graph revealed the evaluation of the participants to the session conducted and

the facilitator or resource speaker. Overall, it yielded an average of 3.48421, qualitatively

described as “Very Satisfactory”. Participants rated the session as 3.5900. This is attributed

to the following: the topic was relevant, the session and the objectives were well-planned,

time allotment and the materials were adequate, and the participants were engaged in the

activity and were able to demonstrate their learning. Moreover, the participants evaluated

the facilitator with an average of 3.3600, qualitatively described “very satisfactory”. This

attributed to the facilitator’s ability to exhibit full grasp of the topic, sensitive to the

participants’ mood, maintain positive learning environment, observed proper attire and was

able to firm up attainment of objectives of the session.

Result from the program manager review of the program (QAME Form D.1)

Program Management and Operations

2.977
2.930 3.220

0.000

0.000
 The graph showed how the management and operation of the program was

conducted. Program Management garnered the highest mean rating of 3.220; followed by

Training Venue with a mean rating of 2.977; and Accommodation with a mean rating of

2.930; all of which were rated to be “Very Satisfactory”. Meals were not evaluated since

no meals were served during the activity.

Result of the participants’ evaluation of the program (QAME Form F)

Program Evaluation

3.5200

3.3867 3.3829
3.3333
3.3029

3.1600

3.0343

The overall evaluation of the program was 3.3029 qualitatively described as “Very

Satisfactory”. Attainment of Objectives garnered the highest mean rating of 3.5200;

followed by Program Management with mean rating of 3.3867; Delivery of Content

garnered a mean rating of 3.3829; Program Management Team was rated 3.3333; Provision

of Support Materials has a mean rating of 3.1600; and Venue and Accommodation was

rated 3.0343; all of which were qualitatively described as “Very Satisfactory”.

Strengths : The Program Management Team are approachable and they

cater the needs of the participants. Facilitators were very
ready with their topics as evidently shown on their delivery.
Area/s for : The facilitators must provide additional training-workshop on
Improvement Research Writing.
The training venue must accommodate all the participants.
Each M and E tool must be simulated for better understanding
and thorough analysis.

Prepared by:

RAQUEL FLORIAN M. DARAUAY

Teacher III

Noted:

GUILBERT R. ORCALES
Secondary School Principal III