Police Charged With Theft of Towed Automobiles!

Towing your property without just compensation is a violation of your substantive

rights in conjunction with Article IV of the American Constitution 1787 -1791, of
which supercedes any State Statutes or the colluding DMV statutes established
ONLY for those who are doing commerce (driving) in the first place. That means
they (driving statutes) are for those who are 'drivers and 'driving', as opposed to
'traveler's who are 'traveling' upon the highways and the by-ways.

HOWEVER, since the people have not known this, as they (we) suffer from a lack
of knowledge, and have allowed these types of infractions, it became very lucrative
for 'other citizens' to 'rob' the peoples' liberties. Thus, they devised colluding plans
disguised as law, that seem to be complex on the surface. With that, they not only
confiscated your property under statutes that are NOT law; they established a
daily charge [Ransom] for 'storage' of your property, and a certain time frame
(usually 21 days) to pay to get your property out of the tow pound. All of this was
done in a violating spirit and intent of theft in the first instance, in the first degree
(meaning with intent). On the surface, and with the people having a lack of
knowledge, and not knowing that public servants and any institutions serving the
public, i.e. any government entitiy or establishment, cannot make up, create or join
alliances with any other agency or establishment, that devises ways to extort the
people.

Therefore, it was easy for those with a thieving mind set and intent, to take the
unjust advantage (in this case of towing and selling automobiles) with the reasonable
chance the automobile would not be picked up from the tow pound, and therefore
would go to their auction (after 21 days). THEY ARE NOT JUST BREAKING
THE LAW -- THEY ARE STRAIGHT UP THIEVES!! against the people's trust, of
which they are in position as public servants and Trustees, to protect. Obviously
they are not Public Servants or Trustees and they are 'Impersonating an Officer and
you will find them in the Court room 'Impersonating an Officer of the Court. We
know what they are, and who they are......they are 'Highwaymen' hired by local
municipalities and States as "State Troopers the Highway Patrol, of which the Mayor
of the Town and the Governor of the respective State corporation is RESPONSIBLE
for the actions of those they hired and conspire with to molest the people:

Highwayman: A bandit; one who robs travelers upon the highway.

Source: Black’s Law 4th Edition Dictionary p.862
If they are claiming to be 'Policemen', that means they are policy enforcers and
policies are for corporations as indicated in the following case law:
It is NOT the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect THE
CORPORATION and arrest code breakers. (SAPP vs. Tallahassee, 348 So. 2nd.
363, Reiff vs. City of Phila. 477 F. 1262, Lynch vs. NC Dept. of Justice 376 S.E.
2nd. 247)

The codes that they arrest people for breaking applies only to those who are in the
jursidiction of same, who are in this case, engaged in 'driving, which is commerce
and trafficking (of goods and passengers). Do NOT ever call someone in your
conveyance a passenger, as that is a terminology of commerce. You must refer to
them as a 'guest' to keep out of the jargon or 'right words' of a colorable
jurisdiction. Therefore, if you are NOT engaging in 'driving' / commerce /
trafficking (of goods and passsengers), then you are NOT subject to the codes of
same and there is no need and no lawful cause or effect to arrrest you -- the
'traveler'. This is very simple, so simple that it apears to be complexed. However,
you (we) must make the distinction and do it collectively, as we collectively gain
this overstanding of what is what, and who is who! People, wake up to
retain your liberties, as the ability to travel freely is the definition of liberty in its
most strictest sense. Any institution, or representative / agent of an agency
or 'government', 'Public Servant' or honorable Officer of any Court, would not take
advantage of the people. In doing so they violate the law and their obligation to
uphold the law and the trust of the people. If the people don't start exercising their
substantive, unlienable / inalienable rights of birth, they can expect more of same --
-Theft of their Liberties, which includes their property!!!