Professional Documents
Culture Documents
_______________
46
LABRADOR, J.:
47
http://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168ac6d698c3c3913e2003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 2/5
2/2/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 006
48
time she found out that some dividend checks which should
have been sent to her were sent instead to petitioner,
making her feel that she was being cheated by petitioner.
Moreover, she found that withdrawals from the Philippine
National Bank and Bank of the Philippine Islands have
been made by petitioner without her prior authority.
We see no irregularity in the appearance of respondent
Atty. Fortunato Patalinghug as counsel for the widow;
much less can we consider it as an actual grabbing of a case
from petitioner. The evidence as found by the Solicitor
General shows that Atty. Patalinghug’s professional
services were contracted by the widow, a written contract
having been made as to the amount to be given him for his
professional services.
Petitioner’s voluntary withdrawal on February 5, 1955,
as counsel for Mrs. Barrera after Atty. Patalinghug had
entered his appearance, and his (petitioner’s) filing almost
simultaneously of a motion for the payment of his
attorney’s fees, amounted to an acquiescence to the
appearance of respondent Atty. Patalinghug as counsel for
the widow. This should estop petitioner from now
complaining that the appearance of Atty. Patalinghug was
unprofessional.
Much less could we hold respondent Atty. Remotigue
guilty of unprofessional conduct inasmuch as he entered
his appearance, dated February 5, 1955, only on February
7, same year, after Mrs. Barrera had dispensed with
petitioner’s professional services on January 11, 1955, and
49
http://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168ac6d698c3c3913e2003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 4/5
2/2/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 006
Case dismissed.
_______________
http://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000168ac6d698c3c3913e2003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 5/5