01 Aug 2017 1607483831U3TZ8MNPFR PDF

PROJECT REPORT FOR PROPOSED
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
At
Survey Nos 52/1, 52/2, 52/3, 52/4, 52/5, 52/6, 52/7
Hebbal Village, Kasaba Hobli,
Bangalore North Taluk,
Bangalore District.
Submitted By
M/s. Embassy – KSL Realty Ventures Pvt. Ltd.,
1st Floor, Embassy Point, No 150, Infantry Road
Bangalore – 560 001
Submitted to
Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change
(MoEF & CC), New Delhi.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
M/s. SAMRAKSHAN,
F- 4, 1st Floor, Swastik Manandi Arcade,
SC Road, Sheshadripuram,
Bangalore - 560 020.
Phone- 080 23460102.
INDEX
APPLICATION IN FORM 1……………………………………………………………………….……………01-13

APPLICACTION IN FORM 1A…………………………………………………………………..……...……..14-24
CHAPTER 1 - PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................ 01-08

1.1-INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 02
1.2-CONTACT INFORMATION .................................................................................................. 02
1.3-PROJECT LOCATION AND INTS ENVIRONS .................................................................... 02
1.4-PRE PROJECT APPRAISAL ................................................................................................ 04
1.5-PROJECTED COST OF THE PROJECT ............................................................................. 04
1.6-LAND USE PATTERN FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT................................................... 04
1.7- AREA STATEMENT FOR THE PROJECT .......................................................................... 05
1.8-SUMMARY OF AREA STATEMENT .................................................................................... 05
1.9-FLOOR WISE ACTIVITY BREAK UP ................................................................................... 06
1.10- CAR PARKING STATEMENT…………………………………………………………………...06
1.11 RESOURCE AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS……………………….06
1.12-LANDSCAPING…………………………………………………………………………………….07
CHAPTER 2 - WATER ENVIRONMENT .............................................................................................. 09-21
2.1-SOURCE OF WATER AND ITS UTILIZATION ..................................................................... 09
2.2-WATER DISTRIBUTION AND STORAGE ............................................................................ 10
2.3-QUALITY AND POTABILITY OF AVAILABLE WATER RESOURCE ................................... 10
2.4-WASTEWATER DISCHARGE DETAILS .............................................................................. 11
2.5- TREATED SEWAGE DISPOSAL ........................................................................................ 11
2.6- WATER SAVING PRACTICES & METHODS ...................................................................... 12
2.7 GREEN CONCEPTS PROPOSED IN THE PROJECT……………………….…...……………12
2.8 DESIGN DETAILS OF PROPOSED SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT………………………..13
2.8.1 TREATMENT METHODOLOGY ADOPTED…………………………………………….13
2.8.2 QUALITY OF DOMESTIC SEWAGE BEFORE & AFTER TREATMENT…………….14
2.8.3 DESIGN DETAILS FOR THE PROPOSED SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
AND DESIGN………………….………………………………………………………………14
2.9 WATER REQUIREMENT & SEWAGE DISPOSAL DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE....21
CHAPTER 3 - SOLID WASTE MANGEMENTA AND ITS UTILIZATION.............................................. 22-26

3.1-CONSTRUCTION PHASE ................................................................................................... 22
3.2-OCCUPANCY PHASE ......................................................................................................... 22
3.2.1-SECONDARY SLUDGE FROM STP .......................................................................... 24
3.2.2-HAZARDOUS WASTE................................................................................................ 25
3.2.3-BIO MEDICAL WASTE ............................................................................................... 25
3.2.4-E-WASTE ................................................................................................................... 25
3.3 DISPOSAL OF DEMOLITION WASTE, EXCAVATED EARTH AND
CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS…………………………………………………………………………25
3.3.1 DISPOSAL OF DEMOLITION WASTE…………………………………………………….25
3.3.2 EXCAVATED EARTH DISPOSAL…………………………………………………………..26
3.3.3 CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS………………………………………………………………….26
CHAPTER 4 - AIR AND NOISE POLLUTION MANAGEMENT ................................................................. 27

4.1-AIR POLLUTION SOURCES AND ITS MANAGEMENT ...................................................... 27
4.2-NOISE GENERATION SOURCES ....................................................................................... 27
CHAPTER 5 - RAIN WATER HARVESTING AND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT ......................... 28-29
5.1-RAIN WATER HARVESTING .............................................................................................. 28
5.2-VOLUME OF RAIN WATER HARVESTED ......................................................................... 28
5.3-STORM WATER MANAGEMENT ....................................................................................... 28
CHAPTER 6 - ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ................................................................... 29-38

6.1-INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 30
6.2-EMP DURING OCCUPANCY PHASE ................................................................................. 30
6.2.1-PERSONNEL SAFETY SYSTEM………………………………………………...….……32
6.2.2-MANAGEMENT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC ISSUES..............................................…...32
6.3- EMP DURING OPERATION PHASE……………………………………………………………33
6.3.1- AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT ................................................................................ 33
6.3.2- WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT……………………………………………………..34
6.3.3- NOISE MANAGEMENT…………………………………………………………………...34
6.3.4-SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT………………………………………………………….34
6.4 -HEALTH RISK AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT………………………………………………………...35
6.4.1- PUBLIC AND HEALTH SAFETY………………………………………………………...35
6.4.2- RISK AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN…………………………………………36
6.5- EMP IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE………………………………………………………………..……36
6.6- ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ROUTINES………………………………………………………..….38
6.7 -TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT MEASURES………………………………………………………………..…..38
6.8-ENERGY CONSERVATION ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT ............................................................. .38
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1- DETAILS OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND MAJOR LANDMARKS…………………………03

Table 1.2- ESTIMATED QUANTITIES OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS…………………………………07
Table 1.3-TREES PRESENT IN THE PROJECT AREA……………………………………………………….07
Table 1.4-TREES PROPOSED IN THE PROJECT AREA…………………………………………………….07
Table 2.1- WATER CONSUMPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT……………………………………..09
Table 2.2- CAPACITY OF WATER STORAGE TANKS………………………………………………………..10
Table 2.3-WASTE WATER DISCHARGE DETAILS……………………………………………………………11
Table 2.4- QUALITY OF SEWAGE BEFORE TREATMENT…………………………………………………..14
Table 2.5- QUALITY OF SEWAGE AFTER TREATMENT…………………………………………………….14
Table 2.6- THE CIVIL UNITS OF STP AND THEIR SIZES……………………………………………………18
Table 2.7- MECHANICAL EQUIPMENTS PROPOSED FOR STP…………………………………………...19
Table 2.8- UNIT SIZE OF PACKAGE STP DESIGNED FOR 80 KLD………………………………………..21
Table 3.1- DETAILS OF SOLID WASTE GENERATION………………………………………………………22
Table 3.2- DEMOLITION DETAILS……………………………………………………………………………….25
Table 3.3- EARTH EXCAVATION DETAILS…………………………………………………………………….26
Table 4.1- AIR POLLUTION SOURCES FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT………………………………..27
Table 5.1-RAIN WATER HARVESTING DETAILS……………………………………………………………..28
LIST OF ANNEXURES
Annexure-1 ELECTRICAL POWER SAVINGS REPORT…………………………………………………39-46
Annexure-2 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT………………………………………………47-55
Annexure-3 PROJECT RELATED DRAWINGS…………………………………………………………….56-63
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
BBMP Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike
BESCOM Bengaluru Electricity Supply Company
BOD Bio-chemical Oxygen Demand
BWSSB Bengaluru Water Supply & Sewerage Board
COD Chemical Oxygen Demand
CPCB Central Pollution Control Board
Cum Cubic Meter
dB (A) A-weighted Decibel
DG Diesel Generator
EC Environmental Clearance
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
E-Waste Electronic Waste
EMP Environmental Management Plan
g/s Grams per second
Hrs Hours
Kg Kilogram
KSPCB Karnataka State Pollution Board
KVA Kilo Volt Ampere
KLD Kilo Liter per Day
L/hr Liter per hour
LPD Liter per Day
m3 Metric cube
mm Milimeter
MoEF & CC Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate
Change
Mt Meter
PPE Personal Protective Equipment
RCC Reinforced Cement Concrete
SEIAA State Level Environmental Impact
Assessment Authority
STP Sewage Treatment Plant
Sq ft Square Feet
Sq m Square Meter
Annexure &
Details to Application in
Form 1 and Form 1A
Embassy KSL Realty Ventures Commercial Development Project
CHAPTER: 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT AT NUTSHELL
PROPOSED PROJECT Commercial Development (Office facility and Retail Activity)

LOCATION Survey Nos. 52/1, 52/2, 52/3, 52/4, 52/5, 52/6 and 52/7
at Hebbal Village, Kasaba Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk,
Bangalore – 560 024.
TOTAL PLOT AREA 40,265.89 sq m (9 Acres 38 Guntas)
TOTAL BUILT UP AREA 2,12,632.36 sq m
TOTAL COST OF PROJECT Rs. 800,00,00,000/-
(Rupees Eight Hundred Crores Only)
NO. OF FLOORS PROPOSED Project consists of Commercial development (Office Buildings)

with 3 buildings
 Building 1 consists of 3 Basements, Lower Ground, Upper
ground and 17 Upper floors
 Building 2 consists of 3 Basements, Lower Ground, Upper
ground and 16 Upper floors
 Building 3 consists of Ground and 2 upper floors
CAR PARKING DETAILS Total No. of parking space proposed is 2613 Cars.
WATER SUPPLY Water supply is from BWSSB sources.
PROPOSED SANITATION Under Ground Sanitary System Facility for conveying the
wastewater to the Proposed Sewage Treatment Plant.
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT Collection and Segregation at source of generation and the
Organic waste will be treated in Organic Converter and the
Inorganic Waste will be sent for recycling.
AIR POLLUTION/ NOISE 10 X 1500 kVA capacity DG sets (6 for building 1 and Utility and
GENERATION SOURCE 4 DG sets for building 2, 3 and Retail) with acoustics are
proposed to be provided with adequate stack height.
1
1.1 INTRODUCTION
M/s. Embassy Group, a leading development firm in real estate commenced its operations in 1993. The
establishment has developed 37 MN sq ft of Commercial, Residential, Retail, Hospitality and Industrial
Warehouse spaces and holds an extensive land bank of 1,700 acres across the country.
Embassy groups is a pioneer in leasing office space and developing integrated office parks. This portfolio
includes Embassy Golf Links, Embassy Manyata Business Park, Embassy Tech Village and Embassy Tech
Zone that houses internationally renowned corporates.
M/s. Embassy – KSL Realty Ventures,1st Floor, Embassy Point, No. 150, Infantry Road, Bangalore - 560
001, intend to develop Commercial Development (Office Buildings and Retail Activities) at Survey Nos. 52/1,
52/2, 52/3, 52/4, 52/5, 52/6 and 52/7 at Hebbal Village, Kasaba Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk, Bangalore –
560 024.
1.2 CONTACT INFORMATION
Contact information of the project proponent is as below:
Sl. No. Description Information

1 Proponent M/s. Embassy – KSL Realty Ventures
2 Address 1st Floor, Embassy Point, No 150, Infantry Road
Bangalore - 560 001
3 Telephone no. +91 41799999
4 e-mail id arathi@embassyindia.com
5 Website www.embassyindia.com
1.3 PROJECT LOCATION AND ITS ENVIRONS:
The proposed project site is in the Northern part of Bangalore. The site is situated between latitude 13°
03'.03" N and Longitude 77°35'47.16" E located at a distance of about 9 Kms from Bangalore city Railway
Station. The general topographical features of the area reveal that the proposed project site and its
surroundings is generally a plain land with gentle slope. The soil nature observed is generally Sandy Loam
Soil. The land around the project site indicates a mixed land use pattern; there are Residential Apartments,
Layouts and few Commercial Establishments and surrounded by areas like Vinayaka Nagar, SBM colony,
AGS layout, Anand Nagar, Hebbal, Byatarayanapura, Kempapura etc.,
The project site has few buildings which are proposed to be demolished as per Construction and Demolition
Waste Management Rules, 2016. The buildings were previously ooccupied by M/s. Astrazeneca India Pvt
Ltd., and were used for Research and Development Centre on Biotechnology. Presently the site has been
purchased by M/s. Embassy KSL Realty Ventures for construction of commercial building project.
 Transportation: The project site is located off NH-7, Bangalore - Hyderabad Highway (300 m
towards west of the project site on main road near Esteem mall).
2
 Agricultural Lands: No agricultural lands are seen in the surroundings areas
 Forest: Bannerughatta National Park at a distance of about 30 Kms from project site.
 Water Bodies: Hebbal lake at about 750 m (South West Direction), Nagavara Lake at about 1.5
Kms (South East Direction), Rachenahalli lake at about 2.25 Kms (North East Direction), Amrutahalli
lake at about 1.25 Kms (North) from the project site.
Table 1.1: Details of adjacent properties and major landmarks around the project site:
Sl. No Description Bearings w.r.t site

1 Adjacent properties:
White Education Consultants East
Kempapura Road South
Private Property North
Embassy lake Terraces West
Jerusalem Marthoma Church South west
2 NH-7, Bangalore – Hyderabad Highway West (300 M)
3 Kemgpegowda International Airport Limited North East (21 KM)
4 Yelahanka Railway Junction North (6 KM)
5 City Railway Station / Majestic South (9 KM)
LOCATION MAP
3
1.4 PRE-PROJECT APPRAISAL:
Any activity involving construction and operation is expected to cause impacts on surrounding environment.
The impacts may be adverse or beneficial, short term or long term and reversible or irreversible.
As per the EIA Notification dated 14th September, 2006 issued by MoEF, Govt. of India the project needs
to obtain Consent from the State Pollution Board and Environmental Clearance (EC) from the State Level
Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA), Karnataka constituted by Ministry of Environment &
Forest, Govt. of India. The built up area of the project is > 20,000 sq m and it comes under Serial No. 8 (a)
of schedule, EIA 2006, Notification (Building and Construction projects with a built-up area > 1,50,000 sq
m and ≤ 3,00,000 sq m). Hence, Environmental Clearance is sought.
1.5 PROJECTED COST OF THE PROJECT:
The total projected cost of the proposed project is presented as below:
Sl. No. Particulars Cost in Rupees
1. Land Cost Rs. 2,29,37,50,000
2. Construction Cost @ rate of Rs. 5,67,61,14,061
Rs. 2,480/sq ft of built up area
Rs. 7,96,98,64,061/- Or say
TOTAL Rs. 800,00,00,000/-
Rupees Eight Hundred Crores Only
1.6 LAND USE PATTERN FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT:
No. Particulars Area in sq m Area in Acres Percentage

1 Total Plot area 40,265.89 9.95 -
2 Road widening 337.25 0.08
Net plot area considered
3 39,928.64 9.86 100
for development
4 Civic amenities area 2,014.00 0.49 5.04
5 Ground Coverage area 12,995.00 3.21 32.54
6 Paved area 18,301.64 4.52 45.83
Landscape area on earth 6,618.00 1.63 16.57
7
Podium landscape 6,542.64 - -
4
1.7 AREA STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT:
SL.NO DESCRIPTION BUILTUP AREA (Sq m)

Building 1 Building 2 Building 3
1 Basement 3 14,715.55
2 Basement 2 20,817.49
3 Basement 1 24,923.03 NA
4 Lower ground 17,059.6
5 Upper ground 13,749.07
TOTAL 91,264.74
6 1st Floor 1569.37 3626.79 2894.99
7 2nd Floor 3,658.63 3,661.31 1,254.49
8 3rd Floor 3,661.61 3,661.31 1,254.49
9 4th Floor to 14th 3,661.61 x 11 3,661.31 x 11 -
Floor (Typical) = 40,277.71 = 40,274.41
10 15th Floor 3,661.61 1,941.05 -
11 16th Floor 2,105.89 1,941.05 -
12 17th Floor 2,105.89 - -
TOTAL - 57,040.71 55,105.92 5,403.97
13 Retail 3,817.02
GRAND TOTAL 2,12,632.36
1.8 SUMMARY OF AREA STATEMENT
Sl. Built up area in Building configuration

Description
No. sq m
3 basements,1 lower ground
1 Building 1 57,040.71 floor, 1 upper ground floor
and 17 upper floors
3 basements,1 lower ground
2 Building 2 55,105.92 floor, 1 upper ground floor
and 16 upper floors
Building 3 with Ground floor and 2 -
3 5,403.97
upper floors
4 Retail 3,817.02 -
Area of 3 Basement floors, Lower
5 Ground floor and upper ground floor 91,264.74
(Combined) of Building 1 & 2 -
Total 2,12,632.36
5
1.9 FLOOR – WISE ACTIVITY BREAK UP
Floor Activity
 Basement 1, 2 and 3
 Lower ground floor and upper Parking and MEP
ground floor service rooms
Level 1 Office and Retail

Level 2 Office
Level 3 to Level 15 Typical Office
Level 16 Office
Level 17 Office
1.10 CAR PARKING STATEMENT:
Sl No. Description Car Parking Proposed

1 Basement 1 762
2 Basement 2 560
3 Basement 3 456
4 Lower Ground Floor 395
5 Upper Ground Floor 265
6 Level 1 175
Total parking 2613
1.11 RESOURCE AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS:

Construction of the project components will require the use of renewable and non-renewable resources
including wood, gravel, sand, steel, concrete, cement, bricks and paper products. The materials, apart from
paper products, will be used during the construction period only and will not be required during the operation
phase of the project. The estimated quantities (Major) of construction materials required are given in Table
1.2.
The material used for construction of the building will be of non–combustible nature. Non–combustible
material will only be used for the construction / erection of false ceiling including all fixtures and used for its
suspension / erection etc., and of low flame rating.
Fuels, such as diesel fuel, gasoline and oil will be used during the construction and operation of the project
for mechanical and electrical equipments.
Electricity will be used during construction to provide power to construction equipment and during operation
for lighting of buildings and running utilities equipments. Electricity consumption will be kept at a minimum
when possible by adopting electricity conservation measures.
6
Table 1.2: Estimated Quantities of Construction Materials
Sl No Description Unit Quantity

1 Reinforcement Steel Metric ton 14,900
2 Bricks Nos 11,99,660
3 Cement Metric ton 46,500
4 Sand Metric ton 88,350
1.12 LANDSCAPING:
The landscaping of project has been planned to provide a clean, healthy and beautiful green environment for
the people within the proposed project site. In the present project about 16% of the total space has been
designated for greenery development and has been designed to achieve a blend between modern building
and various species of plants, shrubs, to create a clean, healthy and aesthetic environment. It provides a
visual retreat and relaxation to the people in the project. The Landscape area in the project is proposed with
combination of Shaded trees, Medicinal plants, Ornamental flowering trees and Hardy palm varieties.
Project site has about 248 trees of various species as listed below, out of it about 138 will be felled (permission
from BBMP forest cell has been obtained vide letter No VRA.A/UV/PR/167/2017-18 dated 30/6/2017), 32 will
be transplanted and remaining 78 which are on the periphery of the site will be retained. In addition to this
351 saplings of indigenous species are proposed to be planted; the list of plant species proposed for
landscaping in the project is detailed in Table 1.4.
Table 1.3: Existing tree structure in the project area
Sl. No Botanical Name Common Name Total Trees To be cut To be To be
retained transplanted
1 Mangifera indica Mango Tree 42 15 10 17
2 Tecoma stans Tecoma Tree 20 15 5 -
3 Jacaranda mimosifolia Jacaranda Tree 20 12 8 -
4 Albizia lebbeck Flea Tree 13 07 6 -
5 Peltophorum pterocarpum Peltophorum Tree 29 20 9 -
6 Tabebuia avellanedae Avalanda Tree 28 21 7 -
7 Azadirachta indica Neem Tree 39 16 8 15
8 Terminalia catappa Almond Tree 27 12 15 -
9 Neolamarckia cadamba Kadamba Tree 30 20 10 -
TOTAL 248 138 78 32
Table 1.4: Trees proposed in the project area:

Sl. Proposed Trees
No Botanical Name Common Name Numbers
SPECIMEN/FLOWERING TREES
1 Bauhinia purpurea Orchid tree
2 Lagerestroea flosreginae Jarul tree 28
3 Tebebuea rosea Pink Trumpet Tree
7
4 Plumeria acutifolia ‘alba’ White frangipani Tree

5 Cassia fistula Golden shower cassia 33
6 Spathodea companulata African Tulip Tree
7 Callistemon lanceolate Lemon bottlebrush
8 Jacaranda mimusifolia Fern Tree 31
9 Delonix regia Royal Poinciana Tree
BOUNDARY & PERIPHERAL BELT TREES
1 Gravelia robusta Silky Oak Tree
2 Milingtonia hortensis Indian Cork Tree 58
3 Butea monosperma Bastard Teak Tree
SHADED / AVENUE TREES
1 Ceiba pentandra Silk-cotton tree
2 Chorisia speciose Silk Floss tree 16
3 Colvillea racemose Colville's Glory
4 Filicium decipens Fern Tree
5 Parkia biglandulosa African locust bean 54
6 Peltophoeum ferrugineum Copperpod
7 Samanea saman Albizia saman
WOODED SPECIES
1 Ficus infectoria White Fig Tree
2 Leucaena leucocephala Lead Tree 24
3 Madhuca indica Honey Tree
4 Pongamia pinnata Indian Beech Tree
5 Sweitana mahogany Mahogany Tree 7
6 Terminalia arjun Arjun Tree
HARDY/ PALM VARIETIES
1 Royastonea regia Royal Palm
2 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan Palm 10
3 Phoenix sylvestris Silver date Palm
4 Caryota urens Fishtail Palm 42
5 Wodyetia bifurcata Foxtail Palm
MEDICINAL VALUE PLANTS
1 Alstonia scholaris Devil Tree
2 Azadirachta indica Neem Tree 29
3 Canaga odorata Perfume Tree
4 Couropita guianensis Cannonball Tree 19
5 Mimusops elengi Bullet wood Tree
TOTAL 351
8
CHAPTER: 2
WATER ENVIRONMENT
2.1 SOURCE OF WATER, UTILIZATION:

The most important aspect under the water supply scheme is the selection of source of Water, which should
be reliable and potable.
The project being a Commercial Development with office buildings and retail activities, water demand is for
domestic purpose, public uses and firefighting purposes. It includes the quantity of water required for drinking,
flushing, landscaping etc. The quantity of water required depends on the habits, social status, climatic
conditions and customs of the people. In India on an average the water requirement for Commercial
Establishment is 45 LPCD. The anticipated water demand is worked out by taking into consideration that the
project is fully developed.
Table 2.1: Water consumption of the proposed project:
(1) Water requirement of Office Facility:
Sl No Building Area Total number of Occupants Water required considering 45

(considering 1 for 100 sq ft) LPCD
1 Building 1 6,51,299 6,513 2,93,085
2 Building 2 6,20,607 6,206 2,79,270
3 Building 3 58,743 587 26,415
TOTAL 13,306 5,98,770 Litres/ day or say 599
KLD
Water requirement for visitors (considering 5% extra of total demand) 29,900 Litres/day or say 30
KLD
Total water demand of Office Facility 629 KLD
(2) Water requirement for Retail facility:
Sl No Building Area Occupants considering Total water required at

1 for 64.5 sqft 45 LPCD
1 Retail 41,118 637 28,665 liters/day or say
29 KLD
(3) Water requirement for Cafetaria:
Sl No Building Occupants considering (50% of total Total water required at 15 LPCD

population)
1 Building 1 3,257 48855
2 Building 2 3,103 46545
3 Building 3 294 4410
4 Retail 318 4,770
TOTAL 1,04,580 liters/day or say 105 KLD
9
(4) Summary of water requirement:
Total water requirement of the proposed Commercial Facility and Retail Activity project is
Sl No Building Water requirement

1 Office Facility 629 KLD
2 Retail Activity 29 KLD
3 Cafeteria 105 KLD
Total 763 KLD
NOTE:
The average per capita demand of 45 LPCD accounts to an overall demand of 763 cum/day. Out of 45 LPCD,
25 LPCD for domestic requirements while and further water for flushing @ 20 LPCD is fed from STP
reclaimed water.
From the above demand, about 90% of water converts into sewage which amounts to 687 cum. Hence a
Sewage Treatment Plant of 720.0 cum is proposed considering 5% extra cushion to take care of shock loads
and also to keep the electro mechanical systems modular.
2.2 WATER DISTIBUTION AND STORAGE:

The proposed water supply scheme to cater to the public and domestic water requirement of the proposed
project consists of sourcing pre-treated potable water from Public supply into a common collection facility
known as the Raw Water Sump. The Raw Water Sump will be constructed in RCC. The water from the UG
sump will be pumped to overhead tank. The OHTs are staged on terrace depending on the contour of its
distribution network. Capacity of water storage tanks proposed in the project is as under:
Table 2.2: Capacity of water storage tanks
Sl. No. Description Capacity in cum
1 Fire storage tank 975
2 UG tank 650
3 Raw Water tank 325
4 Treated water tank 325
2.3 QUALITY & POTABILITY OF AVAILABLE WATER SOURCE:

The quality of water from the source (BWSSB) is good; treatment of the same is not envisaged except
disinfection. After the treatment of water, it is distributed through a network of distribution system. The
distribution system consists of pipes of various sizes, valves, meters, pumps, and hydrants. The valves
provided in the distribution network will control flow of water through the system. Fire hydrants are provided
to connect water to firefighting equipments during fire.
10
2.4 WASTE WATER DISCHARGE DETAILS

Wastes of different type such as spent water from toilets, water closets/ pans, street washings, semi liquid
waste of human excreta are produced daily. If proper arrangement for collection treatment and disposal of
all the wastes produced are not made, unsanitary conditions will develop and it will become impossible for
the public to live. Therefore, it is most essential to collect, treat and dispose all the sanitary waste produced.
Generally, it has been observed that about 90 % of the water supplied comes out as sewage. Therefore, the
total quantity of wastewater generated from the proposed project is worked out as below.
Table 2.3: Waste water discharge details:
Total water demand for the proposed project 763 KLD

Wastewater generated from the proposed project 7,63,000 X 0.90 =
(Assuming wastewater generation to be about 90 % of the total water 6,86,700 Liters/day
consumption) or say 687 KLD
Domestic wastewater generated from the proposed project will be conveyed to Sewage Treatment Plant of
capacity total capacity 720 KLD for treatment and disposal.
2.5 TREATED SEWAGE DISPOSAL

a. Toilet Flushing:
Contributing population from project= 13,306 Persons from Office, 637 from Retail and 6,972 from Cafetaria
Toilet flushing water requirement at the rate of 20 LPCD, 20 LPCD and 5 LPCD respectively.
= 13,306 X 20 = 2,66,120 Liters/day or say 267 KLD
637 x 20 = 12,740 Liters/day or say 13 KLD.
6972 x 5 = 34,860 Liters/day or say 35 KLD.
Total flushing water requirement = 315 KLD.
b. Gardening:
Treated water used for landscape development on earth at the rate of 5 L/sq m/day
Area available for landscape development on earth: 6,618 sq m
Total water used for landscape development on earth is 6,618 X 5
= 33,090 L/day or say 33 KLD
Treated water used for landscape development on podium at the rate of 3 L/sq m/day
Area available for landscape development on podium: 6,542.64 sq m
Total water used for landscape development on podium is 6,542.64 X 4
= or say 26,170.56 L/day or 26 say KLD
Total water requirement of Landscape development = 33 + 26 = 59 KLD
c. Water Cooled Chillers Cooling Tower make up (Commercial facilities):

AC load in TR (Ton of Refrigeration) = 3750
Quantity of water required for AC = 7 L/TR
No. of working hrs/day = 12 Hrs
11
Water requirement = AC Load X Working Hours X Water requirement/TR

= 3750 X 12 X 7
= 3,15,000 L/day or say 315 KLD or say to use 313 KLD
WATER BALANCE CHART
Total Raw Water

demand (Start Up)
763 KLD
Daily water Requirement

Recycle for Toilet 763 – 315 = 448 KLD
Flushing
Wastewater generated 687 KLD
STP Designed for

Total capacity 720 KLD
Toilet Flushing Landscape AC Cooling tower

315 KLD Development make up 313 KLD
59 KLD
2.6 WATER SAVING PRACTICES & METHODS:
Many measures can be adopted to reduce water demand through use of water efficient practices and devices
(efficient plumbing fixtures) these would result in significant saving of water and contribute towards protection
of the environment. Some of the common practices and devices that can save water are covered below:
a) Water conserving flushing fixtures operating on sensors shall be used for Urinals
b) Dual flushing cistern, low flow fixture and faucets shall be used
c) Water closet with low volume flushing cistern/ Flush valve shall be used
d) Water conserving means like pop-up sprinklers, drip irrigation etc., shall be employed to irrigate the
landscape areas
e) Stored Rain water shall be used for domestic purposes after necessary water treatment
12
2.7 GREEN CONCEPTS PROPOSED IN THE PROJECT:
The proposed Commercial Development will be constructed by adopting the following green concepts:
a) Dual Flushing System & Low flow water saving fixtures

b) 100% reuse of wastewater treated on site
c) Rainwater storage and its reuse on site
d) Reducing the impervious cover by using open grid pavement system
e) Preserving the excavated nutrient rich top soil for landscape development
f) Lower installed interior lighting integrated with daylight and motion sensors
g) Variable speed fans on AHU, Heat Recovery, Free cooling and CFC free efficient chiller and
cooling tower
2.8 DESIGN DETAILS OF PROPOSED SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT:

2.8.1 TREATMENT METHODOLOGY ADOPTED:
It is proposed to setup a treatment plant for treating the domestic waste, kitchen waste adopting Sequencing
Batch Reactor using diffused aeration. The other modes of treatment considered before arriving at activated
sludge process are FAB (Fluidized Aerobic Bio Reactor), ASP (Activated Sludge Process) etc. The
advantages and disadvantages of the each scheme, initial investment and maintenance cost etc. were
compared and finally arrived at providing a STP using SBR – Sequencing Batch Reactor.
The units proposed for the proposed STP with Sequencing Batch Reactor are:
Sl. No. Name of the Unit Purpose

1 Bar Screen Chamber For removing unwanted floating materials.
To even out the flow variations and continuous uniform mixing operations
2 Equalization Tank
with course bubble.
Activated Sludge Process for developing the bacterial culture, which
stabilizes the waste using submerged aerators. The SBR will also act as
Sequencing Batch
3 Secondary clarifier during the settle process and as a pre-filtration tank
Reactor
during the decant phase. During the decant phase only the supernatant is
removed from the reactor and taken up for tertiary treatment.
4 Pressure Sand Filter To filter out suspended solids if any in the treated water.
Activated Carbon
5 To remove color and odor if any in the filtered water.
Filter
To disinfect the treated water to make it safe to come in contact with

6 Chlorinator
humans so that the treated water can be used for gardening / allied uses.
Method adopted for the design
The Sewage Treatment Plant is designed SBR (Sequencing Batch Reactor). The system is designed for
operating up to a maximum of 2 cycles in 24 hours period.
13
2.8.2 QUALITY OF DOMESTIC SEWAGE BEFORE & AFTER TREATMENT:

Table 2.4: Quality of sewage before treatment
Sl. Quality Of
Parameter
No. Raw Sewage
1 pH 6–8
2 BOD, mg/l 350
3 TSS mg/l 400
4 SS mg/l 150
5 COD mg/l 450
Table 2.5: Quality of sewage after treatment

Sl. Quality of Treated Sewage
Parameter
No. as per CPCB directions
1 pH 6.5 – 9.0
2 BOD mg/l Not more than 10
3 COD Not more than 50
4 Total Suspended Solids, mg/l Not more than 20
5 NH4-N mg/l Not more than 5
6 NH4 mg/l Not more than 10
7 Fecal coliform (MPN/100 ml) Less than 100
2.8.3 DESIGN DETAILS FOR THE PROPOSED SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT AND DESIGN:
Description of STP
Based on the quality and quantity of sewage generated and simultaneously substantiating the requirements
of Sewage Treatment Plant, Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) technology is envisaged.
The STP proposed for the project is 720 KLD.

The system is designed for operating up to a maximum of 2 cycles in 24 hours period.
The treatment methodology comprises of the following units.
1. Bar screen
2. Collection cum Equalization
3. Sequencing Batch Reactor
4. Pressure Sand Filter
5. Activated Carbon Filter
6. On-line Chlorination
7. Final Sump
DESIGN DETAILS OF 720 KLD STP
A. Bar Screen
In the incoming channel, a chamber medium screen shall be fitted, the purpose of which is to filter out
coarse trashy matter from introducing into succeeding units of the treatment plant. Screens shall be made
14
of Mild steel Construction with Epoxy Painted.

Provide a Chamber of size 2.0 X 2.0 X 0.6 mts
Type of screen : M.S Construction manually cleaned a bar screen of 20 x 6 mm flats with 10mm spacing
in between as coarse bar screen.
B. Equalization Tank / Collection Tank

The flow from the bar screen chamber is let into the equalization tank. In order to homogenize the quality of
wastewater, as well as to feed wastewater at a uniform rate to the rest of the treatment plant, an
equalization tank is proposed. In order to mix the contents, as well as to provide a degree of preparation,
diffused aeration by means of membranes and blowers are proposed.
Flow : 720 Cum
Average flow : 20 hours
Say : 36 cum/hr
Peak factor :3
Peak flow : 36 x 3 = 105 cum/hr
Provide min 2.0 hours holding capacity.
Capacity : 216 cum
Say : 108 cum (2 nos)
Size : 6.3 x 4.3 x 4.0 m (effective depth)
Aeration : Coarse Bubble Diffusers
C. Sequencing Batch Reactor Tank
A sequencing batch reactor (SBR) is a fill – and – draw activated – sludge treatment system. The unit
processes involved in the SBR and conventional activated – sludge systems are identical. Aeration and
sedimentation /clarification are carried out in both systems. However, there is one important difference, in
conventional plants; the processes are carried out simultaneously in separate tanks, whereas in SBR
operation the processes are carried out sequentially in the same tank.
SBR systems have five steps in common that are carried out in sequence as follows
 Fill
 React (aeration)
 Settle (sedimentation/clarification)
 Draw (decant)
 Idle
15
Design
Flow : 720 Cum
BOD After treatment : <10 mg/l
Total BOD load : 720 KLD x 350 mg/l
: 252 kg/day
Assumption
F/M ratio : 0.10
MLSS : 4000 mg/l when tank is full
F/M : Q x BOD/V x MLSS
Hence required volume of the tank = 630 cum

No of Reactor : 3 any (210 + 210 + 210)
No of cycles per batch : 2 nos
Decant fraction of aeration tank : 50 %
Provide Decant tank = 315 cum
Provide volume of the Aeration tank = 210 cum (3 no’s)
Hence required volume of the Aeration tank = 7.5 x 7.5 x 4.0 m (d) 3nos
Decant tank Dimensions = 12.6 m x 12.5 x 2 m
Air Blowers
BOD Load Sequencing/ Aeration tank = 720 KLD X 350 mg/l = 252 kg /day
(2 kg’s of Oxygen is required for every kg of BOD removed)
Oxygen is required in Kg /day = 504 kg/day
30 % Extra is considered for equalization, sludge, & final tank =0.3 x 504= 151.2 kg/day
Oxygen Requirement: 655.20 say 660 cum/hr
Air Blowers Capacity: 327 say 330 cum/hr (2 W & 1S)
Transfer rate of oxygen in 1 m long membrane diffusers =10 cum/hr
TERTIARY TREATMENT SYSTEMS:
Pressure Sand Filter
16
The wastewater after biological treatment still contains some solids, Colour, Odour and harmful micro-
organisms. The pressure sand filter and activated carbon filter are used to remove the solids and Colour.
The disinfection process is used to remove the micro-organisms and Odour. Pressure sand filter with
various grades of pebbles and sand media helps in the removal of residual suspended solids. The filter will
be operating in the pressure range of 3-3.5 kg/cm 2.
Design flow = 50 m 3/hr and considering 15 hr/day of operations of PSF

The recommended PSF dimension is 2.4 m dia in 2 no. and height 1.8 m. Suitable designed backwashing
system is adopted.
Activated Carbon Filter
The recommended ACF dimension is 2.4 m dia in 2 no. and height 1.8 m. Suitable designed backwashing
system is adopted.
Chlorinator
Sodium Hypochlorite is used as disinfectant for treated wastewater. This is available in solution form with
12% to 15% of chlorine. Contact period of 15 to 30 min is specified with minimum chlorine residual to keep
the coliform count under control.
Hence provide 300 - 400 L Tank with 4 - 10 LPH dosing Pump and required dosing can be adjusted as per
requirement.
Ultrafiltration System
Ultra-filtration membrane shall remove the colloidal & particulate matter (Reduces turbidity) from STP Treated
water thus bringing down the BOD=< 5PPM and when further passed with the RO system, it removes TDS
in STP Treated water and produces good quality drinking water.
UF Membranes
Pumps
Sewage transfer pump -2 nos
Capacity : 50 m 3 /hr at 15m head (1W+1S)
Solid handling Size : up to 15 mm
Purpose: to Pump the Sewage from the equalization tank to SBR tank
Sludge transfer pump- 2 nos

Capacity : 25 m 3/hr at 35m head
17
Solid handling Size : up to 15 mm

Mechanical filter press is used to pump the sludge from the SBR tank to sludge holding tank
Filter feed pump -2 nos

Capacity : 50 m 3/hr at 35m head
Purpose: to Pump the Pre-filter water to PSF & ACF.
Centrifuge: 1 no
Capacity : 25.0 m3/hr @ 35m head
Purpose: for dewatering of sludge
Sludge Holding Tank
Sludge production is generally 15% of the total STP plant capacity

Thus, the sludge produced = 720 X 0.15 = 108 KLD
Volume of the sludge m 3 /hr holding tank: 6 m X 4.5 m X 4 m
Final Treated Water Holding Tank – 612 KLD (85% of STP Capacity)
It is envisaged to provide two separate tanks of half day’s storage for the following functions:
1) Holding tank 1 – Domestic treated water for HVAC (Cooling towers and Chillers) applications (180 KLD)
2) Holding tank 2 – Combined application of flushing of water closets and landscaping (430 KLD)
Table 2.6: The civil units and its sizes are:
Sl. No. Description Quantity MOC Dimension (m)

1 Screen Chamber 1 RCC 2.0 m x 2.0 m x 0.6 + FB 0.3 m.
2 Equalization tank 2 RCC 6.3 X 4.3 x 4 m (FB 0.3 m)
3 Aeration tank 3 RCC 7.5 x 7.5 x 4.0m +fb 0.3m
4 Sludge holding tank 1 RCC 6 m x 4.5 m x 4.0 m +(FB 0.3 m)
5 Decant tank 1 RCC 12.6 m x 12.5 m x 2.0m + (FB 0.3m)
6 Pressure Sand Filter 2 MS 2.4 m Dia & 1800 HOS
7 Activated Carbon Filter 2 MS 2.4 m Dia & 1800 HOS
8 Final Tank ( Flushing 1 RCC 10.4 m x 10.3 m x 4.0m +(FB 0.3m)
and landscaping )
9 Final Tank ( HVAC) 1 RCC 8 m x 5.7 m x 4.0m +(FB 0.3m)
18
Table 2.7: Mechanical equipments proposed:
SI.NO Description Quantity Capacity

1 Sewage transfer pump 2 ( 1W+1S) 50 m 3/hr at 15 m head
2 Sludge transfer pump 2( 1W+1S) 25 m 3/hr at 35 m head
3 Filter feed pump 2( 1W+1S) 30 m 3/hr at 35 m head
4 Air blower capacity 3(2W+1S) 330 m 3/hr
5 Centrifuge 1W 25 m 3/hr at 35 m head
19
TYPICAL SCHEMATIC FLOW CHART (720 KLD CAPACITY):
Raw Sewage
Bar Screen
chamber
Equalization Tank
Excess sludge
Disposed in to SBR
Filter Press for
Drying
Decant Tank
PSF
ACF
Chlorine
Dosage
SBR- Sequential Batch
Final Holding Reactor
Tank
PSF- Pressure Sand
Filter
To Reuse for
Flushing / ACF- Activated
Gardening purposes Carbon Filter
20
2.9 WATER REQUIREMENT & SEWAGE DISPOSAL DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE:
Domestic water requirements during construction phase.

Total number of manpower required : 800
Water requirements @ of 100 LPCD : 800 x 100 = 80,000 Liters/day
Total domestic water requirements : 80 KLD
Wastewater discharge (Considering 90% of water consumed comes out as wastewater)
= 80,000 X 0.90 = 72,000 Liters/day or say 72 KLD
The wastewater generated will be treated in Package Sewage Treatment Plant of 80 KLD Capacity and
treated water will be reused for dust suppression and construction/curing activities.
Table 2.8: Unit size of package STP designed for 80 KLD
Description Size
Bar Screen Chamber 0.4 x 0.6 x 1.2 m
Equalization Tank 3.2 x 3.2 x 2.0 m SWD
SBR Tank 4.68 x 4.68 x 2.75 m SWD
Pressure Sand filter 1.01 m dia 1.5 HOS
Activated Carbon Filter 1.01 m dia 1.5 HOS
21
CHAPTER: 3
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
3.1 CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

The total manpower : 800
Considering solid waste generation @ 0.2 kg/capita/day
Total solid waste generation : 800 x 0.2 = 160 Kgs/day
The domestic wastes will be disposed through BBMP authorities.
3.2 OCCUPANCY PHASE:
The wastes that are generated from the day to day activities which are in solid form are categorized as solid
wastes. Solid Wastes include dry refuse of offices, street sweepings, and also electronic wastes. The quantity
of solid waste generated from the proposed project is calculated as follow s.
Table 3.1: Details of solid waste generation
Sl No Description Population Solid waste generated kg/day *

Total Organic Inorganic (60%)
(40%)
1 Building 1,2 and 3 14637 14637 x 0.2 = 2927 1171 1756
2 Retail 587 587 x 0.4 = 235 94 141
Total 3,162 Kg/day 1,265 1,897
*considering solid waste generated in office as 0.2 kg/day and 0.4 kg/day in retail buildings and 40% of the
solid waste generated is organic waste.
The solid Wastes generated will be segregated at its point of generation and collected separately in different
color coded Synthetic Bins depending upon the basis of its Bio Degradability at a common designated point.
The collection and disposal of the solid wastes from the project is done in such a way that it is scientifically
disposed without causing eyesore or any adverse effects to the surrounding environment. Organic solid
waste from the project will be treated in an Organic Waste Converter and is used as manure for Landscape
or used as fuel. The inorganic solid waste is proposed to be recycled.
22
23
The compost formed by this method will have a pH value of 6.5 – 7.5 C: N ratio of 15:1 and organic matter
of 40 – 50%. There will not be any pathogens and the pellets manufactured will have a calorific value of 3,500
to 4,000 Kcal/Kg.
3.2.1 SECONDARY SLUDGE FROM STP:
The solid waste generated from the STP of secondary settling is in the form of stabilized secondary sludge.
Then it is passed through the Plate & Frame filter press, the solids obtained as semi solid cakes will be used
as organic manure for the development of landscaping within the premises. The quantity of secondary sludge
from the secondary settling units of the treatment plant
* Rate: 720 m 3/day and Sludge: 108 Kgs/Day (Considering 15% of sewage volume as sludge generation)
24
3.2.2 HAZARDOUS WASTE:
The Hazardous waste generated from the project is Waste Oil from DG Sets of about 500 Litres/annum which
will be stored is oil seared (HDPE) barrels and disposed through KSPCB approved and CPCB register waste
oil re-processors. Authorization will be obtained from KSPCB as per Hazardous waste (Management &
Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016.
3.2.3 BIO MEDICAL WASTE:

The Bio Medical Waste generated from the project will be collected and segregated at source based on their
categorization as per the Biomedical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules in containers and will be
disposed as per the guidelines. Common designated place will be earmarked for the storage of bio medical
waste and will be disposed scientifically.
3.2.4 e - WASTE:
The Electronic Waste (e-waste) such as CD’s, Pen drives, computer and its components, used batteries,
etc., from the project will be segregated, collected and stored at a designated place and will be handed over
to authorized recyclers.
3.3 DISPOSAL OF DEMOLITION WASTE, EXCAVATED EARTH AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS:
3.3.1 DISPOSAL OF DEMOLITION WASTE

Presently in the project there are about Seven Buildings of various dimensions. Previously the buildings were
occupied by M/s. Astrazeneca India Pvt Ltd., and was used for Research and Development centre on
Biotechnology. The centre was operated by obtaining consents from KSPCB. The research work was
stopped(the centre is relocated) during 2016 and the site was brought by M/s. Embassy KSL Realty Ventures
through sale deed. Now, M/s. Embassy KSL Realty Ventures intend to develop commercial building project,
hence the below buildings are proposed for demolition. The demolition work will be undertaken as per the
Construction and Demolition waste management rules, 2016.
The proposed project involves demolition of the existing building with the built up area of 23,095.9 sq m.
Table 3.2: Demolition details
Sl. No. Building Name Built up Area in Sq m Anticipated Quantity of Debris in Cum
1 Block B 1 14,600 4964
2 Block B 2 423.3 143.92
3 Block B 5 434.5 147.73
4 Block B 8 71.5 24.31
5 Block B 9 6,512.8 2214.3
6 Block B 9 a 1,040 353.6
7 Block B 12 13.8 4.69
Total 23,095.9 7,852.55 or say 8,000
25
The above buildings in the project site are proposed for dismantle and demolition. All the buildings are of
Laterite Masonry walls. The total quantity of debris generated by dismantling and demolition of building
structures is about 8,000 cum. The debris generated will be segregated into four streams such as concrete,
soil, steel, wood and plastics, bricks and mortar. A demolition contractor will be engaged who recovers steel,
glass, wood, marble and stone etc. which fetch income. Demolition and management plan will be
implemented as per the rules and norms of BBMP. Part of demolition waste will be reused for paved area
formation within the project. Excess debris after recovering reusable will be disposed at pre- identified site
identified by BBMP.
3.3.2 EXCAVATED EARTH DISPOSAL
The proposed buildings in the project has basement floors and earth excavation is necessary. Quantity of
earth excavated and its disposal is detailed below.
Table 3.3: Earth excavation details
Sl No Description Basement Area Basement Earth excavated

Sq m (A) Height * (B) m (A x B) Cum
1 Building 1 and 2 24,923.03 8 1,99,384.24 or
say 2,00,000
* Building 1 and 2 has 3 basements, and considering average level difference at site as 1 m, the assumed
height of excavation necessary for basement floor is 8 m (Considering standard basement height as 3 m)
The excavated earth will be reused for backfilling, landscape development (top soil will be stored at site and
reused at appropriate time), paved area formation activity within the project site (1,01,000 Cum). The
excess excavated earth of 1,01,500 cum will be disposed of at pre – identified site.
For backfilling: Considering 35% of the total excavated earth to be reused: 2,00,000 x 35% = 70,000 Cum
For landscape development (considering 1 m filling) :13,160 x 1 = 13,160 Cum
For paved area development (considering 0.5 m filling by soil and
0.5 m by construction waste for formation) :18301 x 1 = 18,301 Cum
Total quantity of excavated soil to be reused within the project = 1,01,461 Cum
Or say 1,01,500 Cum
3.3.3 CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS:
About 200 cum of construction debris generated will be used as preparatory for formation activities within the
project site. Necessary measures and modern construction practices such as proportioning and weigh
batchers for concreting etc. will be implemented to reduce construction debris.
26
CHAPTER: 4
AIR AND NOISE POLLUTION MANAGEMENT
4.1 AIR POLLUTION SOURCES & ITS MANAGEMENT:
The anticipated power required for the project (about 6899 kW) will be supplied from BESCOM. The primary
sources of air pollution from the establishment are from the operation of diesel generator sets. The project
will be provided with DG set of following capacity and is installed to serve as an alternative back up source
of power supply in the event of breakdown of power supply from BESCOM. The details of capacities & fuel
consumption for the DG sets are given below.
Table 4.1: Air Pollution Sources for the Proposed Project:
Sl. No Stack Details Stack Attached to

Physical Details D.G Set
1 Capacity For Building 1 and Utility = 6 X 1500 kVA
For Building 2, 3 & Retail = 4 x 1500 kVA
2 Fuel quantity 298.95 L/hr for DG set of 1500 kVA capacity.
3 Fuel used High Speed Diesel
4 Stack height Chimneys (Above roof level) of 79 for 1500
kVA DG sets.
5 Stack diameter Each DG set dia of the pipe = 600 mm
Emission Details
1 Sulphur dioxide 0.097 g/s for each DG set
2 Suspended 0.03 g/s for each DG set
Particulate Matter
(SPM)
3 Oxides of Nitrogen 0.57g/s for each DG set
4.2 NOISE GENERATION SOURCES
Major noise producing sources of the Commercial Development is expected to be from DG set, Vehicular
movements from and to the proposed project. The DG sets are provided with acoustic enclosures to control
the noise levels in such a way that the noise levels are within the permissible limits specified for ambient
noise levels. More over the DG sets are operated only during the emergencies when there is power failure.
27
CHAPTER: 5
RAIN WATER HARVESTING AND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT:
5.1 RAIN WATER HARVESTING:
The water collected from the terraces of the buildings shall be collected in the rainwater collection sump and
reused for domestic purpose after necessary treatment.
5.2 VOLUME OF RAIN WATER HARVESTED:

The total quantity of water i.e., received in the form of rainfall over an area is called the rain water endowment
of that area, out of which the amount of water that can be effectively harvested is called the rain water
harvesting potential.
Rain Water harvesting potential = Intensity of Rainfall (m) x Roof Area x Impermeability Factor.
The collection efficiency accounts for the fact that all the rain water falling over an area cannot be effectively
harvested due to losses on account of evaporation, spillage or run off etc.,
According to the data available from the Indian Meteorological Department, the Average annual rainfall
around month of September = 194.80 mm
Assuming that about 90 % Rainfall can be effectively harvested.
Number of Rainy Days = 9.3
Therefore the I.R = 194.80/9.3= 20.94 mm/day or 0.02094 m/Day or 0.021 m/day
Table 5.1: Rainwater harvesting details:
Sl Description Top floor area 75 % of Top floor area Quantity of rainwater

No (sq m) (sq m) harvested (Q) Cum*
1 Building 1 2,105.89 1,579.41 29.85
2 Building 2 1,941.05 1,455.78 27.51
3 Building 3 1,254.59 940.94 17.78
Total quantity of rain water harvested = 75.14 or say 76
*Rain water (Q) = 0.021 x 75 % Top floor area x 0.9
5.3 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT:
Storm water disposal is divided into 2 Groups:

 Terrace Storm water disposal: The entire rainwater from the terrace would be disposed through
suitable rain water pipes and collecting in the dedicated rain water collection sump, which is proposed
at site level. This water will be utilized for domestic purpose
 Site (Paved and landscape area) Storm water disposal: The entire storm water from the site would
be disposed-off through suitable RCC Box drainage system to the rainwater recharge pits and the
excess is diverted to external storm water drainage.
28
The amount of storm water that the paved area will produce can be determined by considering the
impermeability factor to be 0.9.
The paved area of the proposed project is 18,301.64 sq m
Q = 0.021 x 18,301.64 sq m x 0.9
= 345.90 cum/day or say 346 cum/day
The amount of storm water that the landscaped area will produce can be determined by considering the
impermeability factor to be 0.3
The landscape area of the proposed project is 6,618 sq m
Q = 0.021 x 6,618sq m x 0.3
= 41.69 cum/day or say 42 cum/day
The Total amount of storm water = paved area + landscaped area
= 346 + 42 cum/day
= 388 cum/day
The Proponents shall also Provide Recharging Pits along the inner periphery of the boundary wall with
recharging pit of size 1.2 m dia x 2.5 m deep spaced at 20 m centre to centre. These recharging pits are filled
with graded media comprising of Boulder at bottom and with coarse aggregates to facilitate percolation of
harvested rain water to Recharge Ground Water table.
29
CHAPTER: 6
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN:
6.1 INTRODUCTION:
The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is aimed at mitigating the possible adverse impact of a project
and ensuring the existing environmental quality. The EMP converse all aspects of planning, construction and
operation of the project relevant to environment. It is essential to implement the EMP right from the planning
stage continuing throughout the construction and operation stage. Therefore the main purpose of the
Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is to identify the project specific activities that would have to be
considered for the significant adverse impacts and the mitigation measures required.
The construction phase impacts are mostly short term, restricted to the plot area and not envisaged on the
larger scale. In the operational phase the environmental impacts are due to continuous operation of the
project, hence, the emphasis in the Environment Management Plan (EMP) is to minimize such impacts. The
following mitigation measures are recommended in order to synchronize the economic development of the
project area with the environmental protection of the region.
The emphasis on the EMP development is on the following;
 Mitigation measures for each of the activities causing the environmental Impact.
 Monitoring plans for checking activities and environmental parameters and monitoring
responsibilities.
 Role responsibilities and resource allocation for monitoring; and
 Implementation of the Scheduled plan.
6.2 EMP DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

During Construction phase, the activities which need to be monitored and managed from the point of pollution
are detailed in the subsequent sections.
Environmental Mitigation Proposed Remarks

Impacts
Noise generation:  Most optimum no. of operations by the heavy To reduce noise level,
caused due to equipment. Equipment provided
demolition machineries,  Selection of equipment with less noise with noise control
Excavators and generation. devices is only used.
Bulldozers  The earth moving equipment shall be
periodically checked and maintained for noise
levels.
 The workers will be provided with PPE such as
ear plugs
30
Dust generation: 
The site cleared will be periodically watered to Tertiary treated water
Leveling and demolition reduce dust emissions to be used.
activities results in the
 Barricades like metal sheets will be provided
emission of dust. all-round the premises to avoid fugitive dust
emission during demolition to the neighboring
area apart from water sprinkling.
 The workers will be provided with PPE such as
nose masks and goggles to reduce impact.
TRANSPORTATION OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
Environmental Impacts Mitigation Proposed
Noise generation  Quality fuel will be used.
 Periodic maintenance of vehicles is required.
Dust generation  Quality packaging of the construction materials
 Construction materials will be covered with tarpaulin sheet to prevent from
being air borne.
 The vehicle speed shall be regulated.
 The workers transporting materials will be provided with PPE such as nose
masks to reduce impact of air borne dust on their health.
Vehicular emissions  Periodic emission check for vehicles will be done.
 Clean fuel will be used for vehicles.
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITES
Environmental Impacts Mitigation Proposed Remarks
Noise generation  Less noise generating equipment Implementation
 Personnel Protective Equipment (PPE) such as ear responsibility:
plugs and helmets will be provided for workers Contractor - Civil
 The working hours to be imposed on the construction Works
workers.
Dust generation  PPE in the form of nose masks will be provided for Implementation
construction workers. responsibility:
 Use of water sprays to prevent dust from being air Contractor
borne.
 Barricades like metal sheets will be provided all
around the premises to avoid fugitive dust emission
in to the neighboring area apart from water sprinkling.
Water discharge  Sewage generated will be treated in Package STP. Implementation
(Construction works) responsibility:
Contractor
31
Air Emissions from  Periodic check and regular maintenance of Implementation

Construction construction machinery for emissions. responsibility:
machinery  Clean fuel are used in equipments Contractor
LABOR CAMPS
Environmental Mitigation Proposed Remarks
Impacts
Wastewater generation The sewage generated from the labors during Responsibility:
construction is estimated to be about 72 KLD will be Contractor
treated in Package STP of 80 KLD Capacity. The treated
water will be reused for dust suppression and
construction/curing activities
Usage of water Water for labor camps will be supplied in required Responsibility:
quantities. Contractor
Solid waste generation Segregation of Dry Waste and Wet Waste. Adequate Implementation
facilities to handle solid wastes shall be provided and will responsibility:
be disposed through BBMP. Contractor –
maintenance.
6.2.1 PERSONNEL SAFETY SYSTEM:
It is planned to adopt the safe working practices which shall govern all construction works undertaken
throughout the project. Following Safety Aids to all laborers will be provided:
 Safety Helmets, Safety Belts, Safety Shoes, Hand gloves
 Gumboots while concreting
 Safety Goggles while welding/ Stone dressing etc.
 Facemasks and full body kit while Pest control
Implementation of Safety procedures such as:

 Using proper lifting techniques
 Using Safe Scaffolds
 Hot work permits for Fabrication and Welding
6.2.2 MANAGEMENT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC ISSUES:
1) Schools for laborer’s children

Temporary education centers (Crèche) will be provided for education of the children of the laborers.
2) Health camp for laborer’s family
Periodical health camps will be organized to monitor and facilitate the occupants of the labor camps.
32
FINANCIAL ALLOCATION AND BUDGETARY PROVISION FOR EMP ASPECTS (CONSTRUCTION

ASPECTS)
Financial Provision in Lakhs
Sl.
Description Capital Recurring
No.
Cost Cost
Environmental Management Plan during construction phase:
Using tertiary treated water for
1 • Sprinkling to control fugitive dusts 2.0 1.0
 Construction & curing purposes 2.0 1.0
 Flushing 2.0 1.0
2 Sewage Treatment Plant for Operation Phase 150.0 -
3 Potable water requirement for the construction workers 2.0 1.0
4 Maintenance of Vehicles and equipments - 2.0
5 Top Soil Conservation 5.0 -
6 Temporary Storm Water Drains 5.0 2.0
7 Personal protection safety gadgets and health care. 4.0 1.0
8 First aid facilities for workers 4.0 1.0
9 Plantation of Saplings 10.0 -
10 Environmental Monitoring Plan (Air, Noise, Water and Soil). - 2.0
TOTAL 186 12
11
Contingency at 10 % 18.6 0.11
TOTAL 204.6 12.1
6.3 EMP DURING OPERATION PHASE:

Following are the identified operational phase activities in the impact assessment, which may have impact
on the environment.
1. Air quality
2. Water quality
3. Noise quality
4. Solid waste disposal
5. Green belt development
6. Storm water Management
6.3.1 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT:

The pollutants envisaged from the proposed project are SPM, SO 2, NOx , HC and CO mainly due to burning
of liquid fuel (HSD) in DG sets. Exhaust from DG set will be emitted from stack of adequate height for
dispersion of gaseous pollutants. The following Table presents the EMP for air quality management during
operation phase.
Air Quality Management during Operation Phase
33

 Equipment selected will ensure the exhaust emission standard as
prescribed as per the latest amendments from the MoEF.
DG set
 DG will be used as stand-by unit
 Periodic check and maintenance
 Ambient air quality monitoring as per the prescribed norms at
Ambient air quality
regular interval.
6.3.2 WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT:

Water requirement of project will be augmented through BWSSB Sources. Details of water requirement and
Water balance is presented in Chapter 2.4.
The sewage generated from the proposed project will be treated in the proposed STP of total capacity 720
KLD. The treatment scheme for domestic sewage generated from project is discussed in Chapter 2.8.
Treated water will be reused for flushing, gardening etc., and the following Table presents the EMP for water
quality.
Water Quality Management during Operation Phase:

Environmental impacts Mitigation Proposed
 Treated with proposed Sewage Treatment Plant to produce tertiary
treated water which is reused for secondary purposes such as flushing,
Wastewater
and landscape development.
 Water conservation measures will be encouraged
6.3.3 NOISE MANAGEMENT:

High noise generating units such as DG sets will be provided with acoustic enclosures. Green belt on the
project boundary will further act as noise barrier and helps in attenuation of noise. The Table presents the
EMP for noise level.
Noise Management during Operation Phase:
Noise from DG set area  Acoustic enclosures will be provided for DG set
 DG set will be installed in an area (utility section) where the access will be
restricted
 The use of PPE (ear plugs) will be mandatory in this area.
 Selection of equipment to ensure that the residual noise level of <55 dB(A)
 Noise levels will be checked periodically using a noise pressure level meter
6.3.4 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT:
The solid wastes generated during operation phase can be categorized as:
 Wet Garbage: Food waste, Lawn mowing wastes etc.
34
 Dry Garbage: Paper, Plastic, Bottles, etc.

 Sludge from Sewage Treatment Plant (STP)
The solid waste generated and its management is detailed in the previous section.
The various mitigation measures to be adopted during collection and disposal of wastes are as follows:
 It is preferable that the container and bins used for collection of waste should be of closed type and
waste is not exposed thus possibility of spreading of disease through flies and mosquitoes is
minimized.
 Collection system should be properly supervised so that quick and regular removal of waste from the
dustbin is practiced.
6.4 HEALTH RISK AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT:
6.4.1 PUBLIC AND HEALTH SAFETY:

Since all the construction related activities are confined to the project site, minimal health related impacts are
envisaged within the project influenced area during the construction stage.
At the project site on an average of 800 no. of persons will be engaged, who face direct exposure to dust and
noise generated from the construction activity. This is likely to cause health related affects such as asthma,
bronchitis etc., and hearing impairments respectively.
To minimize these anticipated impacts, suitable actions like

1. Use of water sprinklers to prevent dust from being air borne.
2. Providing suitable Personal Protective Equipments (PPE) like mouth mask with filters, nose mask,
helmets etc.,
3. Periodic health checkup camp for the laborers will be arranged.
4. Provision of safety belts.
5. In case of injury on site medical treatment and transport will be organized.
Due to operation of the proposed project, there will be enhancement in public Health and safety.
 Regular visit of resident medical officer to take care of the first aid and primary medication in case of
emergency for project occupants and laborers.
 First aid kit with primary medicines will always be available in the medical Centre.
 Display of action plan and preparedness measures during emergency situations.
35
6.4.2 RISK AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN:
CONSTRUCTION PHASE:
Sl. Potential Mitigation

No.
1 Accidental fire Fire safety gadgets.
2 Fall of objects Use of personal protection devices-helmets
3 Working at great Protection to prevent fall, with life safety belts and nets.
heights
4 Accidents from Personal protection gadgets
machinery
5 Electrical mishap Adopting safety measures to prevent any act of negligence and
providing electrical safety measures like fire extinguishers.
OPERATION PHASE:
Disaster is an unexpected event due to sudden failure of the system, external threats, internal disturbances,
earth quakes, fire and accidents.
An appropriate management plan shall be incorporated:
Precautions:
 Once the likelihood of the disaster is suspected, preventive actions should be undertaken by the project
in-charge.
 Conditional maintenance of equipments, materials and expertise for use during emergency.
 The electrical systems shall be provided with automatic circuit breakers activated by over current.
 Proper escape routes are planned and displayed in the public domain.
 Selected representatives are given proper training to guide other inhabitants during Fire accidents.
 Periodic awareness program is conducted for the workers on their roles during emergency situations.
 Important telephone numbers like police authorities, fire department and hospitals for use during
emergency situations will be made available.
6.5 EMP IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
Phased according to the priority, the implementation schedule is presented in the following table:
Implementation Schedule for EMP:
Sl No. Recommendations Requirement
1 Air pollution control measures Before commissioning of respective units
2 Water pollution control measures Before commissioning of the project
3 Noise control measures Along with the commissioning of the project
4 Solid waste management During commissioning of the project
5 Green belt development Stage-wise implementation
36
FINANCIAL ALLOCATION AND BUDGETARY PROVISION FOR EMP ASPECTS (OCCUPANCY PHASE)
Financial Provision in
Sl. Lakhs
Description
No. Capital Recurring
Cost Cost
1 Operation of Sewage Treatment Plant - 5.0
2 Reclaimed Sewage Distribution Network 15.0 2.0
3 Rain water harvesting tanks and its facilities 15.0 2.0
4 Ground water recharging pits & its management 15.0 2.0
5 DG sets acoustic & Maintenance 10.0 2.0
6 Landscaping 15.0 5.0
7 Solid waste management 10.0 2.0
Environmental Monitoring Plan per annum (Air, Noise, Water and
8 - 3.0
Soil)
TOTAL 80 23
9 Contingency at 10 % 8.0 2.3
TOTAL 88 25.3
6.6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ROUTINES:
A comprehensive monitoring program is suggested below:

Monitoring Schedule for Environmental Parameters:
Important
Sl. Particulars Monitoring Duration of
parameters for
No frequency monitoring
monitoring
I Air Quality
1. Ambient Air monitoring
RSPM, SPM, SO2,
Project premises Once in a month 24 hourly sample
NOx
Stack monitoring
Once in a year if SPM, SO2, NOx,
2. Grab
required HC, CO
II Water and Wastewater Quality

1. Water Quality
Groundwater at two locations (up-
As per KSPCB
i. gradient and down-gradient) of treated Once in a month Grab
requirements
effluent discharge area/land
2. Wastewater quality
i. Inlet into STP NA NA -
ii. Treated effluent prior to discharge NA NA -
37
III Soil Quality

Within project premises at 1 location on Composite As per KSPCB
1. Once in 6 month
effluent discharging area/land sample requirements
Visual
2. Ecological preservation and up gradation Seasonal Survival rate
observations
IV Noise monitoring
As per KSPCB
1. Project premises Once in 6 month Day and night
requirements
6.7 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT MEASURES:
 Merging of vehicles will be performed only to left traffic from the exit gates, this ensures safety.
 To establish smooth entry & exit of vehicles, bell mouth shape geometry is provided at the gates.
This ensures smooth transition for merging of vehicles.
 Yellow paint junction boxes are painted at the locations to create psychological barrier for through
drivers to control the speed.
 Rubber humps are introduced for the outgoing vehicles at the exit gate drive way. All gates are
manned with efficient security who can guide the entry and exit of vehicles.
 Adequate sign & guide posts for traffic as per IRC (Indian Roads Congress).
 Road marking, STOP lines, parking lanes, slot numbers etc., must be clearly painted so as to guide
the vehicles
6.8 ENERGY CONSERVATION ASPECTS PROPOSED IN THE PROJECT :
 Energy Efficient motors, whose efficiency is not lower than the limits specified in section 8.2.2 of the
Energy Conservation Building Code will be installed.
 Dry type Transformer with efficiency not lower than the limits specified in section 8.2.1 of the code
shall be considered.
 Power monitoring, recording and check metering will be provided in the main LT panels on the
incoming feeders and individual outgoing feeders covering all parameters such as Current, Voltage,
and Energy & THDI as stipulated in section 8.2.4 of the code.
 Cable sizing and design of distribution system will ensure that the total distribution loss will not
exceed 1% of the total energy consumed as stipulated in section 8.2.5.1 of the code.
 Timer controls will be incorporated in the distribution board of external lighting to save energy as
stipulated in section 7.4 of the code.
 Power conditioning equipment will be installed to limit THDI to 5% which shall also improve power
factor to 0.95 as stipulated in section 8.2.3 of the code.
 Solar Lighting shall be provided at strategic locations in outdoor areas.
 Water cooled Chillers are used instead of air cooled chillers which provide energy savings.
 VFD drives shall be provided for secondary pumps for water cooled chillers and lifts which will result
in energy savings.
38
Project Commercial Development for Astra Zeneca Airtron Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd.
Project :Embassy- Commercial Development for Astra Zeneca Date:14.07.2017
Electrical Power Consumption
Block-A & Utility Loads

Description Area Estimated MD
in
Sq.mt in kW
1 Built-up area (excluding basement & car parking) Block-A 63701.60 3084.4
2 Utility Loads & Block-A Lift loads 2589.4
TOTAL 5673.8
Maximum demand in kW considering Demand factor of 0.7 for a 12 hours/day 3971.7
Power Consumption 12 hours per day in kWH = 47,660.2 (1)
Minimum demand in kW considering Demand Factor of 0.1for rest 12 hours/dary 567.4
Power Consumption 12 hours per day in kWH = 6808.6 (2)
Total consumption of power per day in kWH 54468.8 (1+2)
Total consumption of power per year in Lakh kWH = 198.8 Lakh Units
Block-B+C & Retail space

in
Sq.mt in kW
1 Built-up area (excluding basement & car parking) Block B+C & retail 66016.46 3196.5
2 Built-up area of basement & car parking 96619.74 176.8
3 Utility Loads 245.0
TOTAL 3618.4
Power Consumption 12 hours per day in kWH = 30394 (1)
Total consumption of power per year in Lakh kWH 126.8 Lakh Units
Last Modified Date:14-07-2017

Project Commercial Development for Astra Zeneca Rev-C
Airtron Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd.
Project :Embassy- Commercial Development for Astra Zeneca

Electrical Power Saving using Solar Power Generation
Block-1 , 2 & 3
Description Lighting Load in kW
External Street lighting

Landscape lighting. 30.0
TOTAL 30.0
External lighting Load on solar 30.0
Consumption of power for 12 hours per

day (6PM - 6AM) 360.0
Total Energy Saving using Solar

power in kWH 1.31 Lakh Units

Project :Embassy- Commercial Development for Astra Zeneca Date:14.07.2017
Energy Saving by using copper wound Low loss Transformers
Energy Savings using low loss CU. wound transformer with higher energy efficiency level
1.2 %
Sq.mt in kW
1 Built-up area (Excluding basement & car parking) Block-A 63701.60 3196.5
2 Utility Loads & Block-A Lift loads 176.8
TOTAL 3373.4
Maximum demand in kW considering Demand factor of 0.7

for a 12 hours/day 2361.4
Minimum demand in kW considering Demand Factor of 0.1

for rest 12 hours/dary 337.3
Total consumption of power per day in kWH 32384 (1+2)
Total consumption of power per year in Lakh kWH = 118.2 Lakh Units
Savings in power loss using Cu. Wound low

loss Transformers 1.42 Lakh Units

in
Sq.mt in kW
Built-up area (excluding basement & car parking) Block B+C

1 & retail 4799.57 477.4
2 Built-up area of basement & car parking 61216.90 2964.1
3 Utility Loads 3618.4
TOTAL 7059.9
Power Consumption 12 hours per day in kWH = 59303 (1)
Total consumption of power per year in Lakh kWH 247.4 Lakh Units
Savings in power loss using Cu. Wound low

loss Transformers 2.97 Lakh Units


Electrical Power savings using VFD's for AHU's Date:14.07.2017
Savings in power Using VFD's for AHU's - 25%

Description Area
in
Sq.ft MD in kW for AHU's
Built-up area (excluding basement & car parking)

822.5
1 Block-A 685,429
TOTAL 822.5
Maximum demand in kW considering Demand

factor of 0.8 for a 10 hours/day 658.01
Minimum demand in kW considering Demand

Factor of 0.3 for 4 hours/day 246.75
Power Consumption 4 hours per day in kWH

with Demand Factor of 0.3 =
987.02 (2)

Power Consumption for 10 hours per day in

kWH with Demand Factor of 0.1 =
822.52 (3)
Total consumption of power per day in kWH 8389.7 (1+2+3)
Total consumption of power per year in kWH 30.62 Lakh Units
Savings in power using VFD's for AHU's 7.66 Lakh Units

Description Area
in
Sq.ft MD in kW for AHU's

852.4
1 Block B+C & retail 710,337
TOTAL 852.4



1022.89 Last Modified
(2) Date:14-07-2017


852.40 (3)
Savings in power using VFD's for AHU's 7.93 Lakh Units


Electrical Power savings using LED for lighting Date:14.07.2017
Savings in power Using LED as against Fluorescent Lamps 45%

Description Area
in
Sq.ft MD in kW for lighting

685.4
1 Block-A 685,429
TOTAL 685.4



822.52 (2)


685.43 (3)
Savings in power using LED 11.48 Lakh Units

Description Area
in
Sq.ft MD in kW for lighting

710.3
1 Block B+C & retail 710,337
2 Built-up area of basement & car parking 1,039,628 207.9
TOTAL 918.3




1101.92 (2)


918.26 (3)
Savings in power using LED 15.38 Lakh Units


Savings in Electrical Power Consumption - SUMMARY Date:14.07.2017
Total Power
Power Saving in Power Power
Consumption per Power Saving in
going for low loss savings savings Total Power Total savings in
Description year in lakh Kwh for going for low
Transformers using LED using VFD's savings percentage
Block A, B, C & Solar power
Fixtures for AHU's
Retail
Power Consumption in
1 Lakhs of kWH 325.60 1.42 1.3 26.9 15.6 45.2 13.9

QMP 8.2.4 R/A
REPORT
ON
THE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED OFFICE
BUILDING AT HEBBAL , BENGALURU
CLIENT: M/s. EMBASSY KSL REALITY VENTURES,
# 150, 1st floor, Embassy Point,
Infantry Road,
Bengaluru - 560 001
************
REPORT NO: 290617 – 236/R
REPORT ON THE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED OFFICE
BUILDING ATHEBBAL , BENGALURU
1.0 INTRODUCTION
M/s. EMBASSY KSL REALITY VENTURES, Bengaluru had entrusted us to carry
Geotechnical investigation for the proposed Office Building at, Bengaluru. The primary
objective of this investigation is to establish the geotechnical condition at the site and to
evaluate the allowable bearing pressure and other engineering design parameters through the
various field and laboratory tests. This report consists of the details about the field tests
performed and the recommendations made based on the test results.
2.0 SCOPE
Field work comprising drilling of one borehole conducting SPT tests and collection of
samples started on 29.06.17 and completed on 06.06.17. The primary objective of this
investigation was to obtain information about the sub-surface conditions at the site and
obtain net allowable bearing pressure for design of foundations. Fig A: shows the location of
borehole for the proposed construction site (Refer Annexure I). Details are summarized
below:
BH No. Depth of explorations (m)
BH – 1 & BH – 2 15.0
BH – 3 20.0
BH – 4 11.0
3.0 RELAVENT DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AREA

3.1 General Information about Project Site
The Proposed facility is Office Building (Triple Basement, G+17 floors). The Project site is
located at Hebbal, Bengaluru.
4.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION- RELEVANT DESCRIPTION

4.1 Boring and Drilling
The field investigation comprised of advancing 150mm boreholes using rotary drilling rig
with bentonite mud circulation. Standard penetration test (SPT) was conducted at every
1.50m intervals as per IS: 2131. The number of blows for 30cm penetration of split spoon
sampler was recorded as N-values. The boreholes were terminated after drilling to their
respective depth. The various sub-surface strata are presented in the respective bore chart.
4.2 Standard Penetration Test (SPT) in boreholes
Standard Penetration Test (SPT) to determine penetration resistance was conducted in the
boreholes using the procedure described in IS: 2131. In this method, driving bit is replaced
by split spoon sampler (50.8 mm OD and 35 mm ID) and the sampler is driven by dropping
63.5 kg hammer on the top of the driving collar with a free fall of 75 cm. The length of the
sampler is 60 cm. The sampler is first driven through 15 cm as “Seating Drive”. It is further
driven through 30 cm. The number of blows required to drive the sampler for 30 cm beyond
seating drive is termed as “Penetration Resistance, N”. Representative samples were
collected using split spoon sampler. Where full 30cm penetration beyond seating drive was
not possible, number of blows and corresponding penetration is mentioned in bore logs.
Refer Annexure II for Bore logs.
4.3 Sampling in boreholes
In view of silt dominated formations prevalent, representative samples were mainly
collected from split spoon sampler used for conducting SPT at close intervals of 1.5m.
4.4 Ground water table
At time of investigations, subsequent to completion of borehole and after allowing water
level to stabilize for minimum 24 hours, there was an occurrence of water table at 3.0m
depth below the existing ground level. However, a point to be noted is that, water levels are
invariably subjected to seasonal fluctuations.
5.0 LABORATORY TESTS ON SAMPLES
Assessment of Geotechnical Properties - Samples from Boreholes
The following Tests were carried out
• Grain size analysis
• Natural Moisture content
• Atterberg’s Limits
• Direct shear test
Test results are as shown in Annexure III
6.0 SUB-SOIL PROFILE ANALYSIS
Based on soil explorations, following sub-soil stratification has been noticed upto explored
depth
Layer I: Soil Overburden
The sub-soil stratification essentially comprises of sandy Silt formations with layer of 4.5m.
Layer II: Completely Weathered rock
This layer occurs immediately below layer I. This layer required the use of Tungsten bits for
drilling. The ‘N’ values occurred in the range of 20 - 50 indicating medium dense to dense
strata formation and N>100 indicating very dense stratification.
7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NET SAFE BEARING PRESSURE

Recommendations for Shallow Foundations
1. The foundation for structure having basement shall be taken to a minimum depth of
1.5m below the basement floor level.
2. Isolated/combined footing up to minimum width of 2.0m may be designed with the
following allowable bearing pressure of, which gives a factor of safety of 3.0 against
shear failure and for an allowable settlement of 25mm:
Depth below the Natural Net SBC* (IS 6403 -

Ground Level (m) 1981), (t/m2)
7.5 35
9.0 40
10.5 50
12.0 60 L
13.5 60 L
L: Limited
Note 1: During excavations, in case any variation is noticed in the strata/seepage water same shall be
brought to the notice of geotechnical engineer for review of net SBC recommended.
Note 2: All the structures shall be found on the natural ground only. The above said SBC are indicative
and represents virgin soil strata only
**Where ever structural foundations resting over CWR (N>100) and Rock formations shall be designed with
following recommendations,
Net SBC* (IS 6403 -

Strata
1981), (t/m2)
CWR (N>100) 60
Rock formations 120

CONCLUDING REMARKS
This Geotechnical report is valid for site conditions that prevailed at time of subsurface
explorations. Geo-technical design recommendations are based on the data derived from
borehole investigations. There is a possibility that strata variations could occur. If any
variations indicate significant deviations from the findings of this report, same shall be
brought to the notice of Geo-technical consultant for appropriate design review.
For GEOENGINEERING COMPANY PRIVATE LTD
(JAYAPRAKASH K N)
Annexure II
BORELOG
Client:M/s. EMBASSY KSL REALITY VENTURES Size of Borehole : 150mm
Borehole No : BH 1 Ground water table : Nil
Project : Astra Zeneca Commenced : 29/06/2017
Location: Hebbal Completed :01/07/2017
Core Recovery,
SPT TEST, number of blows
N Value =
Depth (m)
RQD, %
Sample
recorded
Legend
N2+N3
Description of Sub-soil
%
Remarks
stratum 1st 15cm 2nd15cm 3rd15cm
N1 N2 N3
0.0
Reddish brown sandy Silt 0.5 DS
1.5 SPT 4 6 7 13
DS
Reddish brown silty Sand
3.0 SPT 16 17 20 37
DS
4.5 SPT 20 26 31 57 Refusal strata

Brownish yellow CWR
DS
6.0 SPT 30 35 44 79
DS
7.5 SPT 18 24 31 55
Brownish gray CWR
DS
9.0 SPT 20 25 35 60
DS
10.5 SPT 50B/2cm R >100

Brownish gray CWR
DS
12.0 SPT 50B/2cm R >100

DS
Grayish to brownish white
hard rock CR 66 46
13.5
Grayish white hard rock
15.0 CR 98 92
SPT=Standard Penetration test Refusal means SPT N>50

DS=Disturbed Sample B= No. of blows R=Rebound
*Ground water table is as recorded at the time of soil investigation CWR: completely weathered rock
BORELOG
Core Recovery,
N Value =
Depth (m)
RQD, %
Sample
recorded
Legend
N2+N3
%
Remarks
N1 N2 N3
0.0
0.5 DS
Brownish red silty Clay
with gravel
1.5 SPT 6 8 10 18
DS
3.0 SPT 5 8 12 20
DS
4.5 SPT 8 10 24 34
Grayish brown CWR
DS
6.0 SPT 14 18 25 43
DS
7.5 SPT 18 22 34 56 Refusal Strata

DS
Grayish to brownish white
CWR 20 24 44 68
9.0 SPT
DS
10.5 SPT 28 30 45 75
DS
12.0 SPT 30 38 40 78
DS
Grayish yellow CWR 13.5 SPT 21 28 45 73

DS
15.0 SPT 25 30 45 75
DS

BORELOG
Core Recovery,
N Value =
Depth (m)
RQD, %
Sample
recorded
Legend
N2+N3
%
Remarks
N1 N2 N3
0.0
0.5 DS
Yellowish red silty Sand
1.5 SPT 4 4 6 10
DS
3.0 SPT 9 11 13 24
DS
4.5 SPT 11 12 22 34
DS
6.0 SPT 14 20 26 46
DS
7.5 SPT 15 23 29 52
DS
Whitish yellow silty Sand
9.0 SPT 13 18 25 43
DS
10.5 SPT 16 20 25 45
DS
12.0 SPT 12 16 24 40
DS
13.5 SPT 15 19 23 42
DS
15.0 SPT 35 50B/3cm R >100 Refusal Strata

DS
Greenish to brownish 16.5 SPT 48 50B/2cm R >100

yellow CWR DS
18.0 SPT 50B/2cm R >100

DS
20.0 RS R >100

BORELOG
Core Recovery,
N Value =
Depth (m)
RQD, %
Sample
recorded
Legend
N2+N3
%
Remarks
N1 N2 N3
0.0
0.5 DS
Reddish yellow silty Sand
1.5 SPT 5 6 8 14
DS
3.0 SPT 11 12 14 26
DS
4.5 SPT 15 16 20 36
Whitish yellow CWR
DS
6.0 SPT 18 25 31 56 Refusal Strata

DS
Whitish brown CWR
8.0 SPT 50B/2cm R >100
DS
9.5 CR 70 70
Grayish white hard rock
11.0 CR 86 86

GOOGLE MAP
TOPO MAP
Project site
SOURCE: SURVEY OF INDIA

SCALE: 1:50000
LOCATION MAP
PROJECT SITE
CDP MAP
93.00
0
.5
95
TOPO-MAP OF M/S ASTRAZENECA PREMISES

AT AVISHKAR CAMPUS ON BELLARY ROAD,
BANGALORE.
M/S. EMBASSY GROUP

BANGALORE.
NOTE: 1) The physical boundary of the plot is identified

by the clients / their representatives.
A0 SHEET : 841 X 1189 mm
600mm WIDE STORM WATER
DRAIN WITH PRE-CAST
PERFORATED COVER SLAB ON TOP (TYP) 600 X 600mm VALVE CHAMBER
WITH WATER METER
PROPOSED SITE
RP RP SILT CHAMBER &
322.57 M 600mm WIDE STORM WATER
OIL INTERCEPTOR
RP BOUNDARY LINE
DRAIN WITH PRE-CAST 600MM WIDE STORM WATER
RP PERFORATED COVER SLAB ON TOP (TYP) DRAIN CONNECTED TO EXTERNAL
M
9.22
3M BASEMENT SETBACK LINE RP STORM WATER DRAIN
CA RAMP UP FFL 12m SETBACK LINE RP VALVE CHAMBER - 600 x 600
ELT SITE
21
AREA=2013.6 SQM SLOPE 1:10 100.00
LINE
RAMP UP
LINE
.61
LOCATION OF OWC SLOPE 1:10
12m SETBACK
BOUNDARY
FIRE WATER TANK - 01

FIRE PUMP ROOM
ACCESS DOOR
SUPPLY MAIN LINE TAPPING
M
SIZE : 15.0 X 11.0 X 3.0 m LIQUID DEPTH
FROM BWSSB MAIN LINE
CAP : 490 Cum
RAMP UP
SLOPE 1:10
FIRE
92.86 M
FIRE WATER TANK - 02 CORPORATE

SIZE : 15.0 X 11.0 X 3.0 m LIQUID DEPTH PUMP ROOM EVENT TERRACE
NING
CAP : 490 Cum SIZE:225 Sqm LVL. : 898.8 MSL
AD WIDE
RY LINE
TO HYDERABAD
NH-7 ROAD TO BANGALORE
E
RAW WATER TANK
BACK LIN
LOCATION OF OWCSIZE : 15.0 X 7.2 X 3.0 M LIQUID DEPTH
X
HIGH SPEED
BOUNDA
SLOPE 1:10
2.2m RO
RAMP UP
CAP : 325 Cum DIESEL
K LINE
BLOCK-2
12m SET
600mm WIDE STORM WATER PHE
NT SETBAC
TREATED WATER TANK PUMP ROOM 3B+LGF+UGF+16

DRAIN WITH PRE-CAST
PERFORATED COVER SLAB
SIZE : 15.0 X 7.2 X 3.0 M LIQUID DEPTH SIZE: 7.5 X 16.0 M UPPER FLOORS
CAP : 325 Cum
LVL. : 964.05 MSL
3M BASEME
ON TOP (TYP)
RAIN WATER HARVESTING TANK
91.53 M
BLOCK-3 CAP : 180 Cum
G+2 UPPER FLOORS
LVL. : 915 MSL OFFICE PARK
M
BLOCK-1 LVL. : 902.85 MSL

2
3B+LGF+UGF+16
3.1
SOIL PIPE LAID @ BASEMENT

UPPER FLOORS CEILING LVL(TYP)
LVL. : 964.05 MSL WASTE PIPE LAID @ BASEMENT
CEILING LVL(TYP)
TERRACE RAIN WATER PIPE LAID
@ BASEMENT CEILING LVL(TYP)
36.75 M
RAMP UP
SLOPE 1:10 FLUSHING WATER SUPPLY RINGMAIN
POS 12m SETBACK LINE
DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY RINGMAIN
AREA=4032.23 SQM RAMP UP RAMP UP
RAMP UP
SLOPE 1:10 SLOPE 1:10
3M BASEMENT SETBACK LINE SLOPE 1:10
RP BOUNDARY LINE
RP
Y LINE
BOUNDARY LINE
RP RP RP RP
SILT CHAMBER &
BOUNDAR
OIL INTERCEPTOR
DRAIN WITH PRE-CAST 340.69 M 600mm WIDE STORM WATER
PERFORATED COVER SLAB ON TOP (TYP) BOUNDARY LINE DRAIN WITH PRE-CAST 600MM WIDE STORM WATER
PERFORATED COVER SLAB ON TOP (TYP) DRAIN CONNECTED TO EXTERNAL
16m SETBACK LINE STORM WATER DRAIN
16m SETBACK LINE
16m SETBACK LINE

FFL+103.45 m LEVEL GROUND FLOOR LEVEL NOTE:
FFL +103.45 m LVL
FBL + 102.75 m LEVEL PCC 1:2:4 PERFORATED SLAB
1 . ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM UNLESS
OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
2. ALL PIPE SIZES ARE IN MM..
3 . DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWING REFER
PCC 1:2:4
TO DIMENSIONS AS INDICATED.
NOTE:
PLASTERING
IN C M 1:6 PROJECT TITLE: 1 . ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM UNLESS
PUMP ROOM OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
2. ALL PIPE SIZES ARE IN MM..
PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR 3 . DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWING REFER
FBL + 99.75 m LEVEL EMBASSY-KSL REALTY VENTURES ON SY.NO'S : TO DIMENSIONS AS INDICATED.
(52/1, 52/2, 52/3, 52/4, 52/5, 52/ 6 & 52/ 7) AT

PUMP ROOM 100mm THICK PROJECT TITLE:
HEBBAL VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE
P.C.C 1:4:8
BSL + 99.15 m LEVEL NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE -560024. PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR
EMBASSY-KSL REALTY VENTURES ON SY.NO'S :
(52/1, 52/2, 52/3, 52/4, 52/5, 52/ 6 & 52/ 7) AT
RAW WATER TANK HEBBAL VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE
SIZE : 15.0 X 7.2 X 3.0 M LIQUID DEPTH OWNER'S SIGNATURE: NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE -560024.
CAP : 325 Cum
OWNER'S SIGNATURE:
SECTION = X - X
ARCHITECT'S SIGNATURE: ARCHITECT'S SIGNATURE:
FLUSHING WATER SUPPLY RINGMAIN
DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY RINGMAIN

1
CONSULTANT'S SIGNATURE:
PERFORATED
PLATES CONSULTANT'S SIGNATURE:
RUNG
CLIENT:
Embassy Property Developers Private Limited

Embassy Point, 1st Floor 150 Infantry Road Bangalore 560 001 India
BAFFLE
WALL RCC HUME PIPE CLIENT:
ARCHITECTS
RCC HUME PIPE
Embassy Property Developers Private Limited
A Embassy Point, 1st Floor 150 Infantry Road Bangalore 560 001 India
Andy Fisher workshop Pte Ltd.
A 2 Alexandra Road, #02-04, Delta House,
Singapore 159919
t: +65 6372 1695 f: +65 6372 1585
www.afworkshop.com
ARCHITECTS
TO STRUCTURAL PHE & FIRE CONSULTANTS :
DETAIL PLAN
PERFORATED #404 Arihant Complex
Andy Fisher workshop Pte Ltd. 6th Cross J.C.Road,
PLATES Bangalore - 560002
RUNG 2 Alexandra Road, #02-04, Delta House, Tel Phone : 080- 22270066 / 40960040
Singapore 159919 Email : info@adithiconsultants.com
t: +65 6372 1695 f: +65 6372 1585
PURPOSE :
www.afworkshop.com MOEF SANCTION DRAWING
BAFFLE DRAWING TITLE : ORIENTATION
400mm HUME PIPE WALL PHE & FIRE CONSULTANTS :
400mm HUME PIPE DUAL PIPING N
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM
#404 Arihant Complex DRAWING NO : MEP - ADITHI - ASTRAZENACA - PHE-02

FINAL INVERT LEVEL
6th Cross J.C.Road, DESIGNED BY : ANAM REV:
SHEET : A0
Bangalore - 560002 DRAWN BY : B KUMAR R0 1 OF 1
Tel Phone : 080- 22270066 / 40960040 CHECKED BY : MANJULA SCALE : N.T.S
Email : info@adithiconsultants.com APPROVED BY : MANJULA DATE : 06.07.2017
PERFORATED
PLATES PURPOSE :
TO STRUCTURAL
DETAIL MOEF SANCTION DRAWING
DRAWING TITLE : ORIENTATION
SITE PLAN N
MOEF SANCTION PLAN
DRAWING NO : MEP - ADITHI - ASTRAZENACA - PHE-01

SECTION - AA DESIGNED BY : ANAM REV:
SHEET : A0
TYPICAL DETAIL-1 DRAWN BY : B KUMAR R1 1 OF 1
CHECKED BY : MANJULA SCALE : 1 : 500

SILT CHAMBER & OIL INTERCEPTOR
APPROVED BY : MANJULA DATE : 06.07.2017
A1 SHEET : 594 X 841 mm

DRAIN WITH PRE-CAST
PERFORATED COVER (TYP)
REMOVABLE DRAIN
COVER EVERY 10 Mts
OWNER'S SIGNATURE:
DRAIN WITH PRE-CAST
FOR M/s. EMBASSY - KSL REALTY VENTURES
REMOVABLE DRAIN 600mm WIDE STORM WATER

COVER EVERY 10 Mts DRAIN CONNECTING TO NALA
LVL. : 898.8 MSL LVL. : 895.0 MSL BASEMENT LINE

8 M WIDE FIRE DRIVEWAY LVL. : 891.2 MSL
LVL. : 887.7 MSL SIGN........................................................
LVL. : 891.2 MSL FOR M/s. EMBASSY - KSL REALTY
SITE BOU
VENTURES
DIRECT ACCESS REQUIRED
FROM SLIP ROAD ARCHITECTS NAME & SIGNATURE
BLOCK-1
NDARY ROAD WIDENING A

DUCT
DUCT
HSD- 3X50KL
3B+LGF+UGF+16 (92.00)
2200
9820
UPPER FLOORS LVL. : 898.8 MSL
PROPOS EXISTING ROA

8 M WIDE FIRE DRIVEWAY
LVL. : 964.05 MSL
9.8M W
BLOCK-3
G+2 UPPER FLOORS
BLOCK-2

LVL. : 915 MSL DUCT
SIGN.......................................................
ED 12M
D
3B+LGF+UGF+16 JAYANT VAITHA
SOIL PIPE TO STP

( BCC / BL-3.6 A 1685 /07-08 )
DRAIN WITH PRE-CAST
SIZE : 13.0 X 10.5 X 3.0 m LIQUID DEPTH UPPER FLOORS
CAP : 400 Cum
LVL. : 964.05 MSL
WD ROA
DUCT

SIZE : 13.0 X 10.5 X 3.0 m LIQUID DEPTH SOIL PIPE TO STP SOIL PIPE TO STP
BASC
PHE CONSULTANTS
REA=248.2
CAP : 400 Cum
D
D
STP RECLAIMED WATER
FROM STP PLANT ROOM
TO TOILETS & LANDSCAPE USE
FOR M/s. ADITHI BUILDING SERVICE CONSULTANTS
LVL. : 902.85 MSL

RAW WATER TANK
CAP : 390 Cum
2SQM
LVL. : 898.8 MSL
DWS WATER SUPPLY DWS WATER SUPPLY

TO DOMESTIC USAGE TO DOMESTIC USAGE
TREATED WATER TANK

SIGN........................................................
CAP : 390 Cum FOR Ms. MANJULA
RAIN WATER PIPE RAIN WATER PIPE
SEWAGE TREAT MENT PLANT

LVL. : 898.8 MSL
RAIN WATER HARVESTING TANK
RAIN WATER PIPE

CAP : 200 Cum
AREA : 700 Sqm
CAP : 700 KLD LVL. : 895.0 MSL
LVL. : 888.7 MSL

WATER SUPPLY LVL. : 895.0 MSL LVL. : 891.2 MSL
DRAIN WITH PRE-CAST
ENTRY
PERFORATED COVER (TYP) WATER SUPPLY
DRAIN WITH PRE-CAST

REMOVABLE DRAIN DRAIN CONNECTING TO NALA
REMOVABLE DRAIN COVER EVERY 10 Mts
COVER EVERY 10 Mts
#404 Arihant Complex

6th Cross J.C.Road,
PERFORATED Bangalore - 560002
PLATES Tel Phone : 080- 22270066 / 40960040
Email : info@adithiconsultants.com
RUNG
SCALE = DATE 12.04.2017

BAFFLE
WALL OUTLET DRAWN : B KUMAR DEALT : PRAKASH
INLET
A NORTH: DRAWING NO:

A
TO STRUCTURAL
DETAIL PLAN REVISION NO:
PERFORATED
PLATES
RUNG R0
BAFFLE
WALL OUTLET
INLET
JOB TITLE
FINAL INVERT LEVEL
PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR
EMBASSY-KSL REALTY VENTURES ON SY.NO'S
PERFORATED : (52/1, 52/2, 52/3, 52/4, 52/5, 52/ 6 & 52/ 7) AT
PLATES
TO STRUCTURAL HEBBAL VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE
DETAIL
NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE -560024.
MOEF SANCTION DRAWING

DETAIL - AA
TYPICAL DETAIL-1 1
SILT CHAMBER & OIL INTERCEPTOR
MASTER PLAN
MOEF SANCTION DRAWING
PROPOSED SITE
ELT SITE
TO HYDERABAD
NH-7 ROAD TO BANGALORE
LVL. : 895.0 MSL BASEMENT LINE
LVL. : 898.8 MSL

8 M WIDE FIRE DRIVEWAY LVL. : 891.2 MSL
LVL. : 887.7 MSL
LVL. : 891.2 MSL
SITE BOU
DARY N
2200
9820
LVL. : 898.8 MSL
PROPOS
9.8M WD
ROAD WID
GREEN AREAS ON GROUND - 5970.21 SQM
BLOCK-2 GREEN AREAS ON PODIUM - 6593.96 SQM
BLOCK-1

3B+LGF+UGF+16 TOTAL GREEN AREA - 12564.2 SQM
ED 12M
3B+LGF+UGF+16 UPPER FLOORS
E
SPECIMEN / FLOWERING TREES NOS
UPPER FLOORS
XISTING
LVL. : 964.05 MSL 1 Bauhinia purpurea 28
E
BLOCK-3 LVL. : 964.05 MSL 2 Lagerstroea flosreginae
NING ARE
WD ROA
3 Tebebuea rosea
G+2 UPPER FLOORS 4 Plumeria acutifolia 'alba' 33
R
LVL. : 915 MSL 5 Cassia fistula
OAD
6 Spathodea companulata
1 Callistemon lanceolata 31
D
A=248.22S
LVL. : 902.85 MSL 2
3
Jacaranda mimusifolia
Delonix regia
BOUNDARY & PERIPHERAL BELT TREES
1 Gravelia robusta 58
2 Millingtonia hortensis
LVL. : 898.8 MSL
3 Butea monosperma
QM
SHADED / AVENUE TREES
1 Ceiba pentandra 16
2 Chorisia speciosa
3 Colvillea racemosa
4 Filicium decipens 54
LVL. : 898.8 MSL 5 Parkia biglandulosa
6 Peltophoeum ferrugineum
LVL. : 895.0 MSL 7 Samanea saman
HARDY/PALM VARIERTES
1 Royastonea regia 10
2 Washingtonia robusta
LVL. : 888.7 MSL
LVL. : 895.0 MSL LVL. : 891.2 MSL 3 Phoenix sylvestris 42
ENTRY 4
5
Caryota urens
Wodyetia bifurcata
WOODED SPECIES
1 Ficus infectoria 24
2 Leucaena leucocephala
3 Madhuca indica
4 Pongamia pinnata 7
5 Swietana mahogany
6 Terminalia arjun
MEDICINAL VALUE TREES

1 Alstonia scholaris 29
2 Azadirachta indica
3 Canaga odorata 19
4 Couropita guianensis
5 Mimusops elengi
OWNER'S SIGNATURE:
FOR M/s. EMBASSY - KSL REALTY VENTURES
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
ARCHITECT'S SIGNATURE
JAYANT VAITHA
( BCC / BL-3.6 A 1685 /07-08 )
JOB TITLE
PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR
EMBASSY-KSL REALTY VENTURES ON SY.NO'S :
(52/1, 52/2, 52/3, 52/4, 52/5, 52/ 6 & 52/ 7) AT
HEBBAL VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BANGALORE
NORTH TALUK, BANGALORE -560024
DRAWING TITLE
SITE PLAN
DRAWING NUMBER
DATE CAD file ref. SCALE
TOWN PLANER ASISTANT DIRECTOR (N) DEPUTY DIRECTOR (E) JOINT DIRECTOR (E) TOWN PLANNER MEMBER COMMISSIONER 12 Apr. 2017 APR-MOEF-01 1:750
B.D.A B.D.A B.D.A B.D.A B.D.A B.D.A DRAWN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BY
SHEET : 1 / 1
AJ STK JV

01 Aug 2017 1607483831U3TZ8MNPFR PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

01 Aug 2017 1607483831U3TZ8MNPFR PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PROJECT REPORT FOR PROPOSED

COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

APPLICATION IN FORM 1……………………………………………………………………….……………01-13

CHAPTER 1 - PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................ 01-08

2.9 WATER REQUIREMENT & SEWAGE DISPOSAL DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE....21

CHAPTER 3 - SOLID WASTE MANGEMENTA AND ITS UTILIZATION.............................................. 22-26

CHAPTER 4 - AIR AND NOISE POLLUTION MANAGEMENT ................................................................. 27

CHAPTER 6 - ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ................................................................... 29-38

Table 1.1- DETAILS OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND MAJOR LANDMARKS…………………………03

PROPOSED PROJECT Commercial Development (Office facility and Retail Activity)

NO. OF FLOORS PROPOSED Project consists of Commercial development (Office Buildings)

1.2 CONTACT INFORMATION

Contact information of the project proponent is as below:

Sl. No. Description Information

1.3 PROJECT LOCATION AND ITS ENVIRONS:

 Agricultural Lands: No agricultural lands are seen in the surroundings areas

Sl. No Description Bearings w.r.t site

1.4 PRE-PROJECT APPRAISAL:

1.6 LAND USE PATTERN FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT:

No. Particulars Area in sq m Area in Acres Percentage

1.7 AREA STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT:

SL.NO DESCRIPTION BUILTUP AREA (Sq m)

1.8 SUMMARY OF AREA STATEMENT

Sl. Built up area in Building configuration

1.9 FLOOR – WISE ACTIVITY BREAK UP

Level 1 Office and Retail

1.10 CAR PARKING STATEMENT:

Sl No. Description Car Parking Proposed

1.11 RESOURCE AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS:

Table 1.2: Estimated Quantities of Construction Materials

Sl No Description Unit Quantity

Table 1.4: Trees proposed in the project area:

4 Plumeria acutifolia ‘alba’ White frangipani Tree

2.1 SOURCE OF WATER, UTILIZATION:

(1) Water requirement of Office Facility:

Sl No Building Area Total number of Occupants Water required considering 45

(2) Water requirement for Retail facility:

Sl No Building Area Occupants considering Total water required at

(3) Water requirement for Cafetaria:

Sl No Building Occupants considering (50% of total Total water required at 15 LPCD

(4) Summary of water requirement:

Sl No Building Water requirement

Total 763 KLD

2.2 WATER DISTIBUTION AND STORAGE:

2.3 QUALITY & POTABILITY OF AVAILABLE WATER SOURCE:

2.4 WASTE WATER DISCHARGE DETAILS

Total water demand for the proposed project 763 KLD

2.5 TREATED SEWAGE DISPOSAL

c. Water Cooled Chillers Cooling Tower make up (Commercial facilities):

Water requirement = AC Load X Working Hours X Water requirement/TR

WATER BALANCE CHART

Total Raw Water

Daily water Requirement

Wastewater generated 687 KLD

STP Designed for

Toilet Flushing Landscape AC Cooling tower

2.6 WATER SAVING PRACTICES & METHODS:

2.7 GREEN CONCEPTS PROPOSED IN THE PROJECT:

a) Dual Flushing System & Low flow water saving fixtures

2.8 DESIGN DETAILS OF PROPOSED SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT:

Sl. No. Name of the Unit Purpose

To disinfect the treated water to make it safe to come in contact with

Method adopted for the design