9/2/2019 How does the Reynolds Number affect my CFD model?

| Facebook

How does the Reynolds Number affect

my CFD model?
FLOW RESEARCH LAB · SÁBADO, 12 DE MAYO DE 2018

The Reynolds number (Re) is the single most important non-dimensional number in fluid
dynamics and is recommended to be calculated before you begin any new CFD modelling
project. The Reynolds Number is defined as the dimensionless ratio of the inertial forces to
viscous forces and quantifies their relevance for the prescribed flow condition:

Reynolds number

Where U∞ and L are the characteristic velocity and length scale of the problem, ρ is the fluid
density and μ is the dynamic viscosity.

The use of the Reynolds number frequently arises when performing a dimensional analysis
and is known as Reynolds principle of similarity. For example, air flow of U∞ = 1 [m/s]
over a flat plate of L = 1 [m] will exhibit the same flow pattern as air flow of U∞ = 10 [m/s]
over a flat plate of L = 0.1 [m]. This concept holds since the Re is equal and the flow is
incompressible (i.e. the Mach number is low).

The Re also allows us to characterize whether a flow is laminar or turbulent. Laminar flow is
characterized by lower Re and high diffusion over convection. Turbulent flow on the other
hand is characterized by higher Re where inertial forces dominate considerably, resulting in
largely chaotic flow. The flow may also undergo a transitioning phase whereby the flow
exhibits neither completely laminar nor completely turbulent characteristics.

Free shear flow illustrating laminar, transition and turbulent phases

Note: Inertial forces are proportional to the square of velocity, while viscous forces vary
linearly with velocity. Therefore as the Re → 0 it is reasonable to neglect convective terms

https://www.facebook.com/notes/flow-research-lab/how-does-the-reynolds-number-affect-my-cfd-model/460017927773267/ 1/4
9/2/2019 How does the Reynolds Number affect my CFD model? | Facebook

(e.g. creeping flow). Similarly, as the Re → ∞ the viscous terms of the momentum equation
can be neglected and the problem can be characterized purely by the generation of inertial
forces (e.g. high supersonic and hypersonic flows).

For flows in a pipe of diameter L or non-circular pipes with hydraulic diameter L, empirical
studies have shown that laminar flow occurs for ReL < 2500 and fully developed turbulent
flow occurs for ReD > 4000. In the interval between, transition occurs. For external flows
(e.g. flow over a flat plate), laminar flow is observed up to approximately ReD ~ 1×105 to
5×105 (where D is the distance from the leading edge) before transition to turbulence takes
place and turbulent flow is observed thereafter.

Animation illustrating cyclic laminar vortex shedding

Factors influencing transition include roughness and local acceleration. The Turbulence
Modelling team at ANSYS Inc, led by Dr. Florian Menter, have developed world-leading
capabilities to allow CFD users to accurately model these transition effects. Using the
Reynolds number, we can determine whether or not it is necessary to include transition in
our simulation (as this may ultimately affect the development of the boundary layer). For
example, for high speed flows over a flow plate, we may observe that the flow is
predominately turbulent – in this case, transition may safely be neglected. Alternatively, for
cases where laminar flow is observed for a large region of the geometry (i.e. low speed
applications) then modelling fully turbulent flow may be an incorrect assumption.

Consider the flow and wake pattern over a circular cylinder at various Reynolds numbers. At
Re < 1 (see Figure 1), the flow is creeping and laminar and remains attached over the entire
cylinder, which is a characteristic flow governed by momentum diffusion. At Re ~ 10 (see
Figure 2) we begin to see a pair of stable and symmetrical laminar vortices in the wake. The
flow in this regime is steady and the flow pattern will not change over time.

Figure 1: Re << 1 creeping flow (streamlines of velocity)

https://www.facebook.com/notes/flow-research-lab/how-does-the-reynolds-number-affect-my-cfd-model/460017927773267/ 2/4
9/2/2019 How does the Reynolds Number affect my CFD model? | Facebook

Figure 2: Re ~ 10 steady laminar flow (streamlines of velocity)

At a Re ~ 100 (see Figure 3) we see the development of a Kármán vortex street, whereby a
repeating pattern of vortices are shed due to unsteady separation of the flow. While the flow
is unsteady, the vortices are shed in a constant cyclic pattern and the flow remains laminar. A
similar flow pattern is observed for Re ~ 105 (see Figure 4) with the exception that the flow
remains laminar when it separates while the wake is largely unsteady and turbulent. In this
case the use of a transition model is necessary. Assuming fully laminar flow will provide an
erroneous pattern for the wake, and assuming fully turbulent flow will result in a delayed
separation point (which affects the accuracy of lift and drag force prediction).

Figure 3: Re ~ 100 Kármán vortex street (streamlines of velocity)

Figure 4: Re ~ 1e5 laminar flow with largely unsteady and turbulent wake
(Streamlines of turbulent kinetic energy)

At Re ~ 106 (see Figure 5) the flow transitions to turbulence before it separates. The use of a
transition model here is necessary to obtain correct viscous drag predictions but will
ultimately not affect the point of separation and so we can assume that the influence of the
laminar boundary layer is only additive. Furthermore, the flow can be approximated to be
steady-state, as the delayed separation due to the higher stresses caused by turbulent
fluctuations results in a narrower wake region. At even higher Re (while remaining
incompressible - see Figure 6) a highly unsteady turbulent vortex sheet appears and
instabilities in the boundary layer result in the separation point moving further upstream.
https://www.facebook.com/notes/flow-research-lab/how-does-the-reynolds-number-affect-my-cfd-model/460017927773267/ 3/4
9/2/2019 How does the Reynolds Number affect my CFD model? | Facebook

This is called the trans-critical regime. This phenomenon must be captured using a high-
order turbulent scale resolving simulation.

FIgure 5: Re ~ 1e6 steady fully turbulent flow field (streamlines of velocity)

Figure 6: Re ~ 5e6 three-dimensional trans-critical flow showing turbulent vortical

structures

This small example should provide some basis for determining whether the use of a
transition model is necessary, provided we calculate the characteristic Reynolds number and
are aware of the flow pattern that we would like to capture. For further clarification, or for
some insight into your own particular problem, please contact our support line.

FLOW RESEARCH LAB

https://www.facebook.com/notes/flow-research-lab/how-does-the-reynolds-number-affect-my-cfd-model/460017927773267/ 4/4