Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tim Dunne, Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (2013) (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and
Diversity. New York, Oxford University Press.
John Baylis, Steve Smith and Patricia Owens ( 7th Edition) The Globalisation of World Politics, Oxford
University Press.
Theories of IR/Current Issues in IR
Week 2: What is IR Theory for?
• ONTOLOGY: THEORY OF BEING / what is the World made of? What objects
do we study?
• A normative theory would say ‘ theories represent the way the World ought to
be’
• Critical theory would say ‘ we need to have a critical approach to the present,
this would open up alternative paths to change, freedom and human
autonomy’
Ontology:
• is a branch of philosophy that deals with the nature of existence
• Refers to the nature of social reality
• Helps us to understand the nature of social world
• Is there an objective social reality independent from us
*ontology: varlık felsefesi
Positivism vs. Post-positivism
(ontology and epistemology)
Epistemology:
• How can we obtain knowledge about the social world?
• What is knowledge?
• How is knowledge acquired?
• What do people know?
• How do we know what we know?
(4) The main goal of the state is survival. States want to maintain their
territorial integrity and the autonomy of domes<c poli<cal order
(5) States are ra.onal actors. They are capable of coming up with
strategies that maximise their prospects for state survival
(6) Great powers fear each other. There is liDle trust among then.
Again inten<ons are uncertain.
(7) Great powers know that it is a ’self-help world’. Although
coopera<on is possible, ‘self-interest’ comes first.
• Historical debate:
• National security writers like Hobbes, Machiavelli, Rousseau
Pessimist viewà permanent peace is unlikely to be achievedà
• Realist school of thought: Carr and Hans Morgenthau
• Neo-realism (Structural realism): Kenneth Waltz and John
Mearsheimer
• The international system is anarchic: no central authority to
capable of controlling state behaviour
• States are potentially dangerous to each other: offensive
military capabilities
• Uncertainty, a lack of trust:
• National security (or lack of security) is a result of the structure of
the international system
The traditional approach to national security in the Post-Cold
War period
• Interna'onal poli'cs ‘is constrained by the dominant logic of security
compe''on, which no amount of coopera'on can
eliminate’(Mearsheimer 1994, 9)
• No significant change in the nature of security in the post-Cold War
period
• The Gulf War, the violent disintegra'on of the former Yugoslavia
• Coopera'on is possible, but limited due to :
• The problem of chea.ng and the problem of rela.ve gains
rather than absolute gains
Theories of IR/Current Issues in IR
Week 4: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism
Liberalism
• Also labelled as ‘liberal institutionalist’
• Classical liberals ‘John Locke, Hugo Grotius, Immanuel Kant’
• Liberal assumptions in Kant’s framework: belief in the rational
qualifications of individuals, possibility of progress in social life, humans
despite their self-interest nature can ‘cooperate’ and construct a more
harmonius society
• Kant: ‘democratic government, economic interdependence, international
law, and organisations are a means to overcome the security dilemma of
the international system’
• Liberal internationalism: War and conflict can be overcome, or minimised,
through ‘concerted changes in both domestic and international structure of
governance’
Liberalism
• Liberal internationalism: War and conflict can be overcome, or
minimised, through ‘concerted changes in both domestic and
international structure of governance’
Decline in global conflict deaths
(1) The rise in democracies
(2) The increase in economic openness: increase in economic
interdependence
(3) The growth in countries’ membership in intergovernmental
organisaitons
What are the likelihoods of not going to war
Realist assump,ons
• Power ra,o (to deter by military strength)
• Allies/ Alliance
• Distance and size
‘The way we live our lives, the kinds of persons we are, our social relations are all
historical social products’. They ask whether/how we can organize ourselves
differently. Is there a way to have a more peaceful, democratic and equitable world?
Marxism
In the mid-19th century Marx and Engels suggested that ‘capitalist
globalization’ was eroding the foundations of the international
system of states.
Competition and conflict between nation-states would not totally
end, but the actual problem will occur between two main social
classes:
(1) The national bourgeoisie controlling different systems of
government;
(2) A growing cosmopolitan proletariat – through a revolutionary
action proletariat would embed the ideals of Enlightenment
‘equality, liberty, fraternity’ and free all human beings from
exploitation and domination
Marxism
• Capitalism as a ‘form of social life’ involves human freedom and
unfreedom, empowerment and disempowerment:
• Capitalism develops the productive power of human beings, but this
development is disabling, exploitative, undemocratic
• Criticism of capitalism : ‘commodification has reached levels in
which human labour itself is bought and sold in the market’
• This leads to ‘development of historically specific class-based
relations and powers’
• Under Capitalism, although societies are empowered socially, they are
also prevented from realising their true socially productive Powers
• Isolated individuals Vs. ‘collective social product’
Marxism
-- “Capitalism prevents us from looking into social relations as ‘collective and
transformative’
--- “Capitalism is exploitative: ‘ The process and product of socially organized
labour are subordinated to private property and incorporated intothe
accumulation of capital”
«An account of the alienating and exploitative character of
industrial capitalism was linked with a political vision which looked
forward to the democratization of the labour process (regarded as
being as important as democratizing the institutions of the state,
and possibly of greater significance).
Marxism on capitalist globalisa1on
»The bourgeoisie has through its exploitation of the world-market given a
cosmopolitan character to production and consumption in every country … All old-
fashioned national industries have been destroyed or are daily being destroyed …
In place of the old wants, satisfied by the productions of the country, we find new
wants, requiring for their satisfaction the products of different lands and climes. In
place of the old local and national seclusion and self-sufficiency, we have
intercourse in every direction, universal interdependence of nations … The
bourgeoisie, by the rapid improvement of all instruments of production,by the
immensely facilitated means of communication, draws all, even the most barbarian
nations, into civilisation. The cheap prices of its commodities are the heavy artillery
with which it batters down all Chinese walls, with which it forces the barbarians’
intensely obstinate hatred of foreigners to capitulateIt compels all nations, on pain
of extinction, to adopt the bourgeois mode of production … i.e. to become
bourgeois themselves. In one word, it creates a world after its own image» (Marx
and Engels 1977: 224–5)
Marxism
• For Realists, the central flaw of Marxism as an IR Theory is its failure
to anticipate the World events after the 1st World War
• «Class conflicts within autonomous but separate societies would trigger the
great political revolutions. It would spread from one capitalist society to
another»
• ‘Members of the proletariat following the first World War saw that they had
more in common with their own national bourgeoise than with the working
class of other countries’ (Kenneth Waltz, 1959)
• Economic reductionism: Underestimated the concepts of nationalism, the
state and war; over-estimating the understanding of capitalism would solve all
the mysteries of international politics (Kennety Waltz)
Marxism
• ‘A relational and process-oriented’ view of human beings
• Triangular set of relations: (1) the natural world, (2) social relations and
institutions, (3) and human actors
• Humans are material beings: they develop a productive interchange
with the natural world in order to secure survival.
• Humans are social beings: This productive activity is ‘socially organized’
involving social exchanges with other individuals
• Humans continuously remake the natural and social aspects of their
world
Marxism
• Relationship between Agency and Structure
“Structure influences human behavior, and human beings are capable of
changing the social structures”
• Agents are social actors enduring social relations or structures
• Structures generate the possibility of kinds of social identity and corresponding forms of
action
• There is a need to uncover all sorts of hegemonic interests feeding the World
order as a first step to overcome ‘global systems of exclusion and inequality’
Theories of IR/Current Issues in IR
Week 7 : Constructivism
Constructivism
• Neo-realism and neo-liberalism agree on two issues:
• Individualism: is the view that actors have fixed interests and the structure
constrains their behaviour
• Materialism: is the view that the structure constrains behaviour is defined by
distribution of power, technology and geography.
• Neo-realism assertss that interests trump ideas and norms
• Neo-liberal institutionalism recognises that states might willingly construct norms and
institutions to regulate their behaviour if doing so will enhance their long-term interests
These two were the initial two points challenged by scholars who are now known as
‘Constructivists’
Constructivism
Nicholas Onuf (1989) «World of Our Making»
Construc=vism is a social theory, not a substan=ve theory of interna=onal
poli=cs
-- A World without norms and ideas was not very sensible, and
for understanding the behaviour of states and non-state actors,
we also need to understand how they see the World and themselves.
-- The end of Cold War: the impact of ideas to transform the
organisa=on of World poli=cs (transna=onalism, human rights, etc.)
«What is the na*onal interest? How it relates to their
na*onal iden*ty?»
Constructivism
• Constructivists are concerned with human
consciousness and knowledge, and treat ideas as
structural factors that influence how actors interpret
the World, consider the dynamic relationship between
ideas and material forces as a consequence of how
actors interpret their material reality, and are
interested in how agents produce structures and how
structures produce agents
Constructivism
• Constructivism is a social theory, not a substantive theory of
international politics
• Comparable to rational choice: how actors operate with fixed
preferences that they attempt to maximise under a set of constraints?
• Ideas are social. They are constantly shaped in our heads by knowledge,
symbol, language and rules.
• Idealism does not reject material reality. But the meaning of that material
reality is dependent on ideas and interpretation.
Example: Balance of Power is not standing there on its own. States debate about balance
of power, what it means and how they should respond to balance of power.
Common issues within Constructivism
(2) The core of Construc1vism: holism and structuralism
’Rules are not static, but they are revised through practice, reflection,
and arguments by actors regarding how they should be applied to new
situations’ (Finnemore and Sikkink 1998)
Constructivism
• Ideas, knowledge, norms and rules also influence states’ iden66es
and interests and the organisa6on of poli6cs.
• Construc6vism has a strong interest in ‘global change’
• The convergence by states around similar ways of organising domes6c and
interna6onal life;
• How norms become interna6onalised and ins6tu6onalised;
• How norms influence what states and non-states actor do?
• Core ques6ons: Is Interna6onal Poli6cs a system or a society?
• Can norms and ideas define states’ interests
Constructivism: Key Elements
• Power: The forces of power go beyond the material, they can also be
idea0onal (BarneA and Duvall 2005)
• The issue of legi0macy: is an important determinant of power (even great
Powers will frequently feel the need to alter their policies in order to be
viewed as ‘legi0mate’
• Naming and shaming in the human rights field.
Constructivism: Common issues
• The methods of the natural World and the social World are different:
humans reflect on their experiences and use these experiences to
inform their reasons for their behaviour.
• There is no need to search for timeless laws for global politics (or
human sciences), because these will adapt to new social realities
through human experience.
Agent—structure problem
• How to think about the relationship between agents and structures
• One view: agents are born with already formed identities and interests and
then treat other actors and the broad structure that their interactions
produce as a constraint on their interests
• Actors are pre-social and there is little interest in their identities or possibility that they
might change their interests through their interactions with others
• Studies show that both women and men assign a more positive
value to masculine characteristics
• Women in powerful positions appear to act like ‘real man’
• Some feminists argue that such behaviour is necessary for both women
and men to succeed in the tough world of international policy-making
(Cohn 1993)
Feminist theory – Gender analysis
• International rules existed before the emergence of the modern state, but
they have become a global phenomenon during the 20th century
Regime theorists are generally located within two schools of thought: REALISM and
LIBERALISM
- Common assumptions:
- States operate in an anarchic international system
- States are rational and unitary actors
- States are the units responsible for establishing regimes
- Regimes are established on the basis of cooperation in the international system
- Regimes promote international order
How and Why International Regimes are formed and
maintained?
Realism Liberalism
POWER: The role of power in creating and sustaining INTERESTS: Regimes as mechanisms that facilitate
regimes, the consequences regimes may have in achieving optimal outcomes by reducing ‘uncertainty’
power distribution
RATIONALIST RATIONALIST
Ø Regimes promote the common good Ø Regimes generate differential benefits for states
Ø Regimes flourish best when promoted and maintained by a Ø Power is the centre feature of regime formation and
‘benign hegemon’ survival
Ø «HEGEMON IS NOT NECESSARY» Ø «HEGEMONIC STABILITY THEORY»
Ø Regimes help to overcome the problem of anarchy. Because Ø Regimes form in situations where uncoordinated
anarchy inhibits collaboration. That is why we need regimes strategies interact to produce subobtimal outcomes
Ø Regimes promote globalisation and liberal World order Ø The nature of the World order depends on the underlying
principles and norms of regimes
Ø And to maintain a regime, there is need for inspection, Ø States wishing to form a regime confront the problem of
surveillance and scientific studies coordination: THE BATTLE OF SEXES AND PARETO’S
FRONTIER
Ø Regimes promote globalisation and liberal World order Ø The nature of the World order depends on the underlying
principles and norms of regimes
International Regimes
• For some Realists, ‘distributional issues’ is an important issue.
• Regimes are useful for providing stability.
• And they are important in mediating between interests & outcomes.
• States’ sensitivity to relative gains, «that others may get more out of
an agreement than the other ones»
• So, regimes are easier to maintain in ‘economic spheres’ rather than
‘security spheres’
• But at the same time, regimes help to minimize ‘cheating issues’ and
allow for cooperation based on state interests.
International Regimes
• Neoliberals/ Liberal Institutionalists argue that states are primarily
concerned with ‘absolute gains’.
• When deciding to cooperate, states will evaluate what is offered to
them, rather than ‘what they will gain relative to others’
• From the neoliberal perspective, regimes help to solve the »prisoner’s
dilemma»
• Regimes can facilitate cooperation by providing information, reducing
transaction costs, facilitating linkages, a cooperative ‘tit-for-tat’
strategy leaving an actor with ‘absolute gains’
4 Defining Elements of a Regime
1. Principles are presented by coherent bodies of theore1cal
statements about how the World Works
2. Norms iden1fy general standards of behaviour, and iden1fy
the rights and obliga1ons of states
3. Rules operate at a lower level generality than principles and
norms, they are o;en designed to reconcile conflicts between
principles and norms
4. Decision-making procedures iden1fy specific prescrip1ons for
behaviour, e.g. The vo1ng system
(Krasner, 1983:2)
Security Regimes
• An earlier example: Concert of Europe, which was established by
conservative states of post-Napoleonic European states to counter
revolution and conflict
• During the Cold War: SALT 1 ; SALT 2, to bring the arms race between
the US and the Soviet Union under control
• The Partial Test Ban Agreement (1963)
• Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime
Economic Regimes / Communication Regimes
• Communication regimes: Growing attempts to open postal services,
telecommunications, and national airlines to greater competition
• Economic regimes: Established in the post 2nd World War period with
the leadership of the US based on liberal principles
• GATT (now the WTO) : A Trading regime based on free trade principles
• But a trading regime also required stable economies and a stable monetary
system (International Monetary Fund/IMF)