CHISQUARE

1. QUESTION 2 & 9

OBSERVED FREQUENCY

AGE ADVERTISE FRIENDS PRESENT NEIGHBOUR TOTAL

MENT USERS

25-35 YEARS 14 10 3 27

35-45 YEARS 8 1 5 14

ABOVE 45 YEARS 3 2 1 6

LESS THAN 25 64 31 8 103

YEARS

TOTAL 89 44 17 150

EXPECTED FREQUENCY

AGE ADVERTISE FRIENDS PRESENT NEIGHBOUR TOTAL

MENT USERS

25-35 YEARS 16.02 7.52 3.06 27

35-45 YEARS 8.31 4.11 1.59 14

3.56 3.56 1.76 0.68 6

LESS THAN 25 61.11 30.21 11.67 103

YEARS

TOTAL 89 44 17 150
 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
Df = (r-1)*(c-1)
= (4-1)*(3-1)
= (3) * ( 2)
=6
CALCULATON OF X²
O E O–E (O – E)^2 £(O-E)2/E
14 16.02 -2.02 4.08 0.25

8 8.31 -0.31 0.09 0.01

3 3.56 -0.56 0.31 0.09

64 61.11 2.89 8.35 0.14

10 7.92 2.08 4.32 0.55

1 4.11 -3.11 9.67 2.35

2 1.76 0.24 0.05 0.03

31 30.21 0.79 0.62 30.21

3 3.06 -0.06 0.003 0.00

5 1.59 3.41 11.62 7.34

1 0.68 0.32 0.10 0.15

8 11.67 -3.67 13.46 1.16

TOTAL 0.00 52.67 42.28

CALCULATION VALUE OF X² = 42.28

CHI SQUARE DEGREE OF SIGNIFICANT TABLE SIGNIFICANT / NULL

VALUE FREEDOM VALUE VALUE NOT SIGNIFICANT HYPOTHESIS
NOT
42.28 6 0.05 12.59 SIGNIFICANT
ACCEPTED
INTERPRETATION
The result of the chi – square test reveals that the calculated chi – square value (42.28) is greater
than the table chi – square value (12.59) at 5% level of significance and therefore, there is
relationship between price and age. Thus, the hypothesis is that the relationship between the two
factors does hold good. Hence, the null hypothesis is not accepted.

CHISQUARE

2. QUESTION 3 & 11

OBSERVED FREQUENCY

GENDER LESS THAN 6 MONTHS - 1 - 3 YEARS MORE TOTAL

6 MONTHS 1 YEAR THAN 3
YEARS
MALE 19 22 6 2 49
FEMALE 31 39 20 11 101
TOTAL 50 61 26 13 150

EXPECTED FREQUENCY

GENDER LESS THAN 6 MONTHS - 1 - 3 YEARS MORE TOTAL

6 MONTHS 1 YEAR THAN 3
YEARS
MALE 16.33 19.93 8.49 4.25 49
FEMALE 33.67 41.07 17.51 8.75 101
TOTAL 50 61 26 13 150
 DEGREE OF FREEDOM
Df = (r-1)*(c-1)
= (2-1)*(4-1)
= (1) * ( 3)
=3
CALCULATON OF X²
O E O–E (O – E)^2 £(O-E)2/E
19 16.33 2.67 7.1289 0.436552

31 33.67 -2.67 7.1289 0.211729

22 19.93 2.07 4.2849 0.214997

39 41.07 -2.07 4.2849 0.104332

6 8.49 -2.49 6.2001 0.730283

20 17.51 2.49 6.2001 0.354089

2 4.25 -2.25 5.0625 1.191176

11 8.75 2.25 5.0625 0.578571

TOTAL 0.00 45.35 3.82

CALCULATION VALUE OF X² = 3.82

CHI SQUARE DEGREE OF SIGNIFICANT TABLE SIGNIFICANT / NULL

VALUE FREEDOM VALUE VALUE NOT SIGNIFICANT HYPOTHESIS

3.82 3 0.05 7.82 NOT SIGNIFICANT ACCEPTED

INTERPRETATION
The result of the chi – square test reveals that the calculated chi – square value (3.82 ) is less than
the table chi – square value (7.82 ) at 5% level of significance and therefore, there is no
relationship between taste and age. Thus, the hypothesis is that the relationship between the two
factors does not hold good. Hence, the null hypothesis is accepted.
CHISQUARE

3. QUESTION 2 & 12

OBSERVED FREQUENCY

A B C D E F G H TOTAL
LESS 10 2 5 10 8 2 18 1 56
THAN 25
YEARS
25-35 12 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 17
YEARS
35-45 2 4 12 10 2 2 1 0 32
YEARS
ABOVE 45 10 4 8 10 2 5 2 4 45
YEARS
34 12 26 30 12 7 22 7 150

EXPECTED FREQUENCY
A B C D E F G H TOTAL
LESS 12.69 4.48 9.70 11.2 4.48 2.61 8.21 2.61 56
THAN 25
YEARS
25-35 3.85 1.36 2.94 3.4 1.36 0.79 2.49 0.79 17
YEARS
35-45 7.25 2.56 5.54 6.4 2.56 1.49 4.69 1.49 32
YEARS
ABOVE 45 10.2 3.6 7.8 9 3.6 2.1 6.6 2.1 45
YEARS
34 12 26 30 12 7 22 7 150
DEGREE OF FREEDOM
Df = (r-1)*(c-1)
= (4-1)*(8-1)
= (3) * ( 7)
= 21
CALCULATON OF X²
O E O–E (O – E)^2 £(O-E)2/E

10 12.69 -2.69 7.2361 0.570221

12 3.85 8.15 66.4225 17.2526

2 7.25 -5.25 27.5625 3.801724

10 10.2 -0.2 0.04 0.003922

2 4.48 -2.48 6.1504 1.372857

2 1.36 0.64 0.4096 0.301176

4 2.56 1.44 2.0736 0.81

4 3.6 0.4 0.16 0.044444

5 9.70 -4.7 22.09 2.27732

1 2.94 -1.94 3.7636 1.280136

12 5.54 6.46 41.7316 7.53278

8 7.8 0.2 0.04 0.005128

10 11.2 -1.2 1.44 0.128571

0 3.4 -3.4 11.56 3.4

10 6.4 3.6 12.96 2.025

10 9 1 1 0.111111

8 4.48 3.52 12.3904 2.765714

0 1.36 -1.36 1.8496 1.36

2 2.56 -0.56 0.3136 0.1225

2 3.6 -1.6 2.56 0.711111

 2 2.61 -0.61 0.3721 0.142567

0 0.79 -0.79 0.6241 0.79

2 1.49 0.51 0.2601 0.174564

5 2.1 2.9 8.41 4.004762

18 8.21 9.79 95.8441 11.67407

1 2.49 -1.49 2.2201 0.891606

1 4.69 -3.69 13.6161 2.90322

2 6.6 -4.6 21.16 3.206061

1 2.61 -1.61 2.5921 0.993142

1 0.79 0.21 0.0441 0.055823

0 1.49 -1.49 2.2201 1.49

4 2.1 1.9 3.61 1.719048

TOTAL 0.00 372.72 73.91

CALCULATION VALUE OF X² = 73.91

CHI SQUARE DEGREE OF SIGNIFICANT TABLE SIGNIFICANT / NULL

VALUE FREEDOM VALUE VALUE NOT SIGNIFICANT HYPOTHESIS
NOT
73.91 21 0.05 32.67 SIGNIFICANT
ACCEPTED

INTERPRETATION
The result of the chi – square test reveals that the calculated chi – square value (73.91) is greater
than the table chi – square value (32.67) at 5% level of significance and therefore, there is
relationship between price and age. Thus, the hypothesis is that the relationship between the two
factors does hold good. Hence, the null hypothesis is not accepted.
CHISQUARE

4. QUESTION 5 & 19

OBSERVED FREQUENCY

<499 >3000 1000-1499 1500-1999 2000-2499 500-999 TOTAL

1 TO 5 0 12 3 1 9 30
2LAKHS
2 TO 10 2 33 3 1 19 68
4LAKHS
LESS 6 0 10 3 2 4 25
THAN
1LAKHS
MORE 8 0 6 6 0 7 27
THAN 4
LAKHS
TOTAL 29 2 61 15 4 39 150

EXPECTED FREQUENCY

<499 >3000 1000-1499 1500-1999 2000-2499 500-999 TOTAL

1 TO 5.80 0.40 12.20 3.00 0.80 7.80 30
2LAKHS
2 TO 13.15 0.91 27.65 6.80 1.81 17.68 68
4LAKHS
LESS 4.83 0.33 10.17 2.50 0.67 6.50 25
THAN
1LAKHS
MORE 5.22 0.36 10.98 2.70 0.72 7.02 27
THAN 4
LAKHS
TOTAL 29 2 61 15 4 39 150
DEGREE OF FREEDOM
Df = (r-1)*(c-1)
= (4-1)*(6-1)
= (3) * ( 5)
= 15
CALCULATON OF X²
O E O–E (O – E)^2 £(O-E)2/E
5 5.80 -0.8 0.64 0.11

10 13.15 -3.15 9.9225 0.75

6 4.83 1.17 1.3689 0.28

8 5.22 2.78 7.7284 1.48

0 0.40 -0.4 0.16 0.40

2 0.91 1.09 1.1881 1.32

0 0.33 -0.33 0.1089 0.33

0 0.36 -0.36 0.1296 0.36

12 12.20 -0.2 0.04 0.00

33 27.65 5.35 28.6225 1.03

10 10.17 -0.17 0.0289 0.00

6 10.98 -4.98 24.8004 2.26

3 3.00 0 0 0.00

3 6.80 -3.8 14.44 2.12

3 2.50 0.5 0.25 0.10

6 2.70 3.3 10.89 4.03

1 0.80 0.2 0.04 0.05

1 1.81 -0.81 0.6561 0.36

2 0.67 1.33 1.7689 2.67

0 0.72 -0.72 0.5184 0.72

9 7.80 1.2 1.44 0.18

 19 17.68 1.32 1.7424 0.10

4 6.50 -2.5 6.25 0.96

7 7.02 -0.02 0.0004 0.00

TOTAL 0.00 112.73 19.61

CALCULATION VALUE OF X² = 19.61

CHI SQUARE DEGREE OF SIGNIFICANT TABLE SIGNIFICANT / NULL

VALUE FREEDOM VALUE VALUE NOT SIGNIFICANT HYPOTHESIS
19.61 15 0.05 25.00 NOT SIGNIFICANT ACCEPTED

INTERPRETATION
The result of the chi – square test reveals that the calculated chi – square value (19.61) is less
than the table chi – square value (25.00 ) at 5% level of significance and therefore, there is no
relationship between taste and age. Thus, the hypothesis is that the relationship between the two
factors does not hold good. Hence, the null hypothesis is accepted.

CHISQUARE

5. QUESTION 4 & 28

OBSERVED FREQUENCY

EDUCATION ALLERGIC LESSER SHOW TOTAL

REACTIONS BANDWIDTH RESULTS
OF
FLAVOURS

BACHELOR 15 10 29 54
GRADUATE
HIGHER 3 0 9 12
SCHOOL
LEVEL

POST 18 6 28 52
GRADUATE

PROFESSIONAL 9 3 7 19

SECONDARY 5 1 7 13
SCHOOL
LEVEL

TOTAL 50 20 80 150

EXPECTED FREQUENCY
EDUCATION ALLERGIC LESSER SHOW TOTAL
REACTIONS BANDWIDTH RESULTS
OF
FLAVOURS

BACHELOR 18 7.20 28.80 54

GRADUATE

HIGHER 4 1.60 6.40 12

SCHOOL
LEVEL

POST 17.33 6.93 27.73 52

GRADUATE
PROFESSIONAL 6.33 2.53 10.13 19

SECONDARY 4.33 1.73 6.93 13

SCHOOL
LEVEL

TOTAL 50 20 80 150

DEGREE OF FREEDOM
Df = (r-1)*(c-1)
= (5-1)*(3-1)
= (4) * ( 2)
=8
CALCULATON OF X²
O E O–E (O – E)^2 £(O-E)2/E
15 18 -3 9 0.5

3 4 -1 1 0.25

18 17.33 0.67 0.4489 0.025903

9 6.33 2.67 7.1289 1.126209

5 4.33 0.67 0.4489 0.103672

10 7.20 2.8 7.84 1.088889

0 1.60 -1.6 2.56 1.6

6 6.93 -0.93 0.8649 0.124805

3 2.53 0.47 0.2209 0.087312

1 1.73 -0.73 0.5329 0.308035

29 28.80 0.2 0.04 0.001389

9 6.40 2.6 6.76 1.05625

 28 27.73 0.27 0.0729 0.002629

7 10.13 -3.13 9.7969 0.967117

7 6.93 0.07 0.0049 0.000707

TOTAL 0.00 3.1 7.24

CALCULATION VALUE OF X² = 7.24

CHI SQUARE DEGREE OF SIGNIFICANT TABLE SIGNIFICANT / NULL

VALUE FREEDOM VALUE VALUE NOT SIGNIFICANT HYPOTHESIS
7.24 8 0.05 15.51 NOT SIGNIFICANT ACCEPTED

INTERPRETATION
The result of the chi – square test reveals that the calculated chi – square value (7.24 ) is less than
the table chi – square value (15.51 ) at 5% level of significance and therefore, there is no
relationship between taste and age. Thus, the hypothesis is that the relationship between the two
factors does not hold good. Hence, the null hypothesis is accepted.

CHISQUARE

6. QUESTION 2 & 12

OBSERVED FREQUENCY

A B C D E F G H TOTAL
LESS 10 2 5 10 8 2 18 1 56
THAN 25
YEARS
25-35 12 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 17
YEARS
35-45 2 4 12 10 2 2 1 0 32
 YEARS
ABOVE 45 10 4 8 10 2 5 2 4 45
YEARS
34 12 26 30 12 7 22 7 150

EXPECTED FREQUENCY
A B C D E F G H TOTAL
LESS 12.69 4.48 9.70 11.2 4.48 2.61 8.21 2.61 56
THAN 25
YEARS
25-35 3.85 1.36 2.94 3.4 1.36 0.79 2.49 0.79 17
YEARS
35-45 7.25 2.56 5.54 6.4 2.56 1.49 4.69 1.49 32
YEARS
ABOVE 45 10.2 3.6 7.8 9 3.6 2.1 6.6 2.1 45
YEARS
34 12 26 30 12 7 22 7 150

DEGREE OF FREEDOM
Df = (r-1)*(c-1)
= (4-1)*(8-1)
= (3) * ( 7)
= 21

CALCULATON OF X²
O E O–E (O – E)^2 £(O-E)2/E

10 12.69 -2.69 7.2361 0.570221

12 3.85 8.15 66.4225 17.2526

2 7.25 -5.25 27.5625 3.801724

10 10.2 -0.2 0.04 0.003922

2 4.48 -2.48 6.1504 1.372857

2 1.36 0.64 0.4096 0.301176

4 2.56 1.44 2.0736 0.81

4 3.6 0.4 0.16 0.044444

5 9.70 -4.7 22.09 2.27732

1 2.94 -1.94 3.7636 1.280136

12 5.54 6.46 41.7316 7.53278

8 7.8 0.2 0.04 0.005128

10 11.2 -1.2 1.44 0.128571

0 3.4 -3.4 11.56 3.4

10 6.4 3.6 12.96 2.025

10 9 1 1 0.111111

8 4.48 3.52 12.3904 2.765714

0 1.36 -1.36 1.8496 1.36

2 2.56 -0.56 0.3136 0.1225

2 3.6 -1.6 2.56 0.711111

2 2.61 -0.61 0.3721 0.142567

0 0.79 -0.79 0.6241 0.79

2 1.49 0.51 0.2601 0.174564

5 2.1 2.9 8.41 4.004762

18 8.21 9.79 95.8441 11.67407

1 2.49 -1.49 2.2201 0.891606

1 4.69 -3.69 13.6161 2.90322

2 6.6 -4.6 21.16 3.206061

1 2.61 -1.61 2.5921 0.993142

1 0.79 0.21 0.0441 0.055823

0 1.49 -1.49 2.2201 1.49

 4 2.1 1.9 3.61 1.719048
TOTAL 0.00 372.72 73.91

CALCULATION VALUE OF X² = 73.91

CHI SQUARE DEGREE OF SIGNIFICANT TABLE SIGNIFICANT / NULL

VALUE FREEDOM VALUE VALUE NOT SIGNIFICANT HYPOTHESIS
NOT
73.91 21 0.05 32.67 SIGNIFICANT
ACCEPTED

INTERPRETATION
The result of the chi – square test reveals that the calculated chi – square value (73.91) is greater
than the table chi – square value (32.67) at 5% level of significance and therefore, there is
relationship between price and age. Thus, the hypothesis is that the relationship between the two
factors does hold good. Hence, the null hypothesis is not accepted.