POST-WORKSHOP EVALUATION REPORT

Poor Fair Adequate Good Excellent

1 2 3 4 5

Date of Convention

Registration Fee

Topics

Venue

Audio Visual Facilities

Food

Module I: Epidemiology of Dengue in the Philippines

Speaker:
Topic was relevant to my practice and met personal
expectations.

My knowledge was increased by the lecture.

Level of presentation was appropriate for the audience.

Sufficient time was provided for open discussion.

Speaker answered questions satisfactorily.

Module II: Clinical Course of Dengue

Speaker:
Topic was relevant to my practice and met personal
expectations.

My knowledge was increased by the lecture.

Level of presentation was appropriate for the audience.

Sufficient time was provided for open discussion.

Speaker answered questions satisfactorily.

Module III: Case Classification

Speaker:
Topic was relevant to my practice and met personal
expectations.

My knowledge was increased by the lecture.

Level of presentation was appropriate for the audience.

Sufficient time was provided for open discussion.

Speaker answered questions satisfactorily.

Module IV: OPD Management of Dengue

Speaker:
Topic was relevant to my practice and met personal
expectations.
My knowledge was increased by the lecture.

Level of presentation was appropriate for the audience.

Sufficient time was provided for open discussion.

Speaker answered questions satisfactorily.

Module V: In Patient Management of Dengue

Speaker:
Topic was relevant to my practice and met personal
expectations.

My knowledge was increased by the lecture.

Level of presentation was appropriate for the audience.

Sufficient time was provided for open discussion.

Speaker answered questions satisfactorily.

Module VI: Fluid Management in Dengue

Speaker:
Topic was relevant to my practice and met personal
expectations.

My knowledge was increased by the lecture.

Level of presentation was appropriate for the audience.

Sufficient time was provided for open discussion.

Speaker answered questions satisfactorily.

Workshop Case I:
Facilitator:
Topic was relevant to my practice and met personal
expectations.

My knowledge was increased by the lecture.

Level of presentation was appropriate for the audience.

Sufficient time was provided for open discussion.

Speaker answered questions satisfactorily.

Sufficient time was provided for open discussion.

Speaker answered questions satisfactorily.

Workshop Case 2:
Facilitator:
Topic was relevant to my practice and met personal
expectations.
My knowledge was increased by the lecture.

Level of presentation was appropriate for the audience.

Sufficient time was provided for open discussion.

Speaker answered questions satisfactorily.

Workshop Case 3:
Facilitator:
Topic was relevant to my practice and met personal
expectations.

My knowledge was increased by the lecture.

Level of presentation was appropriate for the audience.

Sufficient time was provided for open discussion.

Speaker answered questions satisfactorily.

Workshop Case 4:
Facilitator:
Topic was relevant to my practice and met personal
expectations.

My knowledge was increased by the lecture.

Level of presentation was appropriate for the audience.

Sufficient time was provided for open discussion.

Speaker answered questions satisfactorily.

OVER-ALL WORKSHOP RATING 1 2 3 4 5

What topics would be of interest to you in the next workshop?

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Other Comments/ Suggestions: ____________________________________________________________________