escheat them in favor showing that the subject lands had been

of Pasay City conveyed by Hankins to private respondent

notwithstanding an Solano, the same still remained, at least before
allegation that they the escheat, part of the estate of the decedent
had been previously and the lower court was right not to assume
donated. We recall otherwise. The Court of Appeals therefore cannot
that a motion for perfunctorily presuppose that the subject
intervention was properties were no longer part of the decedent’s
earlier denied by the estate at the time the lower court handed down
escheat court for its decision on the strength of a belated
failure to show "valid allegation that the same had previously been
claim or right to the disposed of by the owner. It is settled that courts
properties in decide only after a close scrutiny of every piece
question." 9 Where a of evidence and analyze each case with
person comes into an deliberate precision and unadulterated
escheat proceeding thoroughness, the judgment not being diluted by
as a claimant, the speculations, conjectures and unsubstantiated
burden is on such assertions.
intervenor to escheat them in favor of Pasay City
establish his title to notwithstanding an allegation that they had been
the property and his previously donated. We recall that a motion for
right to intervene. A intervention was earlier denied by the escheat
fortiori, the court for failure to show "valid claim or right to
certificates of title the properties in question." 9 Where a person
covering the subject comes into an escheat proceeding as a claimant,
properties were in the burden is on such intervenor to establish his
the name of the title to the property and his right to intervene. A
decedent indicating fortiori, the certificates of title covering the
that no transfer of subject properties were in the name of the
ownership involving decedent indicating that no transfer of ownership
the disputed involving the disputed properties was ever made
properties was ever by the deceased during her lifetime. In the
made by the absence therefore of any clear and convincing
deceased during her proof showing that the subject lands had been
lifetime. In the conveyed by Hankins to private respondent
absence therefore of Solano, the same still remained, at least before
any clear and the escheat, part of the estate of the decedent
convincing proof and the lower court was right not to assume
otherwise. The Court intervention was earlier denied by the escheat
of Appeals therefore court for failure to show "valid claim or right to
cannot perfunctorily the properties in question." 9 Where a person
presuppose that the comes into an escheat proceeding as a claimant,
subject properties the burden is on such intervenor to establish his
were no longer part title to the property and his right to intervene. A
of the decedent’s fortiori, the certificates of title covering the
estate at the time the subject properties were in the name of the
lower court handed decedent indicating that no transfer of ownership
down its decision on involving the disputed properties was ever made
the strength of a by the deceased during her lifetime. In the
belated allegation absence therefore of any clear and convincing
that the same had proof showing that the subject lands had been
previously been conveyed by Hankins to private respondent
disposed of by the Solano, the same still remained, at least before
owner. It is settled the escheat, part of the estate of the decedent
that courts decide and the lower court was right not to assume
only after a close otherwise. The Court of Appeals therefore cannot
scrutiny of every perfunctorily presuppose that the subject
piece of evidence and properties were no longer part of the decedent’s
analyze each case estate at the time the lower court handed down
with deliberate its decision on the strength of a belated
precision and allegation that the same had previously been
unadulterated disposed of by the owner. It is settled that courts
thoroughness, the decide only after a close scrutiny of every piece
judgment not being of evidence and analyze each case with
diluted by deliberate precision and unadulterated
speculations, thoroughness, the judgment not being diluted by
conjectures and speculations, conjectures and unsubstantiated
unsubstantiated assertions.
assertions. escheat them in favor of Pasay City
escheat them in favor notwithstanding an allegation that they had been
of Pasay City previously donated. We recall that a motion for
notwithstanding an intervention was earlier denied by the escheat
allegation that they court for failure to show "valid claim or right to
had been previously the properties in question." 9 Where a person
donated. We recall comes into an escheat proceeding as a claimant,
that a motion for the burden is on such intervenor to establish his
title to the property lower court handed down its decision on the
and his right to strength of a belated allegation that the same
intervene. A fortiori, had previously been disposed of by the owner. It
the certificates of is settled that courts decide only after a close
title covering the scrutiny of every piece of evidence and analyze
subject properties each case with deliberate precision and
were in the name of unadulterated thoroughness, the judgment not
the decedent being diluted by speculations, conjectures and
indicating that no unsubstantiated assertions.
transfer of ownership escheat them in favor of Pasay City
involving the notwithstanding an allegation that they had been
disputed properties previously donated. We recall that a motion for
was ever made by intervention was earlier denied by the escheat
the deceased during court for failure to show "valid claim or right to
her lifetime. In the the properties in question." 9 Where a person
absence therefore of comes into an escheat proceeding as a claimant,
any clear and the burden is on such intervenor to establish his
convincing proof title to the property and his right to intervene. A
showing that the fortiori, the certificates of title covering the
subject lands had subject properties were in the name of the
been conveyed by decedent indicating that no transfer of ownership
Hankins to private involving the disputed properties was ever made
respondent Solano, by the deceased during her lifetime. In the
the same still absence therefore of any clear and convincing
remained, at least proof showing that the subject lands had been
before the escheat, conveyed by Hankins to private respondent
part of the estate of Solano, the same still remained, at least before
the decedent and the the escheat, part of the estate of the decedent
lower court was right and the lower court was right not to assume
not to assume otherwise. The Court of Appeals therefore cannot
otherwise. The Court perfunctorily presuppose that the subject
of Appeals therefore properties were no longer part of the decedent’s
cannot perfunctorily estate at the time the lower court handed down
presuppose that the its decision on the strength of a belated
subject properties allegation that the same had previously been
were no longer part disposed of by the owner. It is settled that courts
of the decedent’s decide only after a close scrutiny of every piece
estate at the time the of evidence and analyze each case with
deliberate precision ownership involving the disputed properties was
and unadulterated ever made by the deceased during her lifetime.
thoroughness, the In the absence therefore of any clear and
judgment not being convincing proof showing that the subject lands
diluted by had been conveyed by Hankins to private
speculations, respondent Solano, the same still remained, at
conjectures and least before the escheat, part of the estate of the
unsubstantiated decedent and the lower court was right not to
assertions. assume otherwise. The Court of Appeals
escheat them in favor therefore cannot perfunctorily presuppose that
of Pasay City the subject properties were no longer part of the
notwithstanding an decedent’s estate at the time the lower court
allegation that they handed down its decision on the strength of a
had been previously belated allegation that the same had previously
donated. We recall been disposed of by the owner. It is settled that
that a motion for courts decide only after a close scrutiny of every
intervention was piece of evidence and analyze each case with
earlier denied by the deliberate precision and unadulterated
escheat court for thoroughness, the judgment not being diluted by
failure to show "valid speculations, conjectures and unsubstantiated
claim or right to the assertions.
properties in escheat them in favor of Pasay City
question." 9 Where a notwithstanding an allegation that they had been
person comes into an previously donated. We recall that a motion for
escheat proceeding intervention was earlier denied by the escheat
as a claimant, the court for failure to show "valid claim or right to
burden is on such the properties in question." 9 Where a person
intervenor to comes into an escheat proceeding as a claimant,
establish his title to the burden is on such intervenor to establish his
the property and his title to the property and his right to intervene. A
right to intervene. A fortiori, the certificates of title covering the
fortiori, the subject properties were in the name of the
certificates of title decedent indicating that no transfer of ownership
covering the subject involving the disputed properties was ever made
properties were in by the deceased during her lifetime. In the
the name of the absence therefore of any clear and convincing
decedent indicating proof showing that the subject lands had been
that no transfer of conveyed by Hankins to private respondent
Solano, the same still escheat them in favor of Pasay City
remained, at least notwithstanding an allegation that they had been
before the escheat, previously donated. We recall that a motion for
part of the estate of intervention was earlier denied by the escheat
the decedent and the court for failure to show "valid claim or right to
lower court was right the properties in question." 9 Where a person
not to assume comes into an escheat proceeding as a claimant,
otherwise. The Court the burden is on such intervenor to establish his
of Appeals therefore title to the property and his right to intervene. A
cannot perfunctorily fortiori, the certificates of title covering the
presuppose that the subject properties were in the name of the
subject properties decedent indicating that no transfer of ownership
were no longer part involving the disputed properties was ever made
of the decedent’s by the deceased during her lifetime. In the
estate at the time the absence therefore of any clear and convincing
lower court handed proof showing that the subject lands had been
down its decision on conveyed by Hankins to private respondent
the strength of a Solano, the same still remained, at least before
belated allegation the escheat, part of the estate of the decedent
that the same had and the lower court was right not to assume
previously been otherwise. The Court of Appeals therefore cannot
disposed of by the perfunctorily presuppose that the subject
owner. It is settled properties were no longer part of the decedent’s
that courts decide estate at the time the lower court handed down
only after a close its decision on the strength of a belated
scrutiny of every allegation that the same had previously been
piece of evidence and disposed of by the owner. It is settled that courts
analyze each case decide only after a close scrutiny of every piece
with deliberate of evidence and analyze each case with
precision and deliberate precision and unadulterated
unadulterated thoroughness, the judgment not being diluted by
thoroughness, the speculations, conjectures and unsubstantiated
judgment not being assertions.
diluted by escheat them in favor of Pasay City
speculations, notwithstanding an allegation that they had been
conjectures and previously donated. We recall that a motion for
unsubstantiated intervention was earlier denied by the escheat
assertions. court for failure to show "valid claim or right to
the properties in otherwise. The Court of Appeals therefore cannot
question." 9 Where a perfunctorily presuppose that the subject
person comes into an properties were no longer part of the decedent’s
escheat proceeding estate at the time the lower court handed down
as a claimant, the its decision on the strength of a belated
burden is on such allegation that the same had previously been
intervenor to disposed of by the owner. It is settled that courts
establish his title to decide only after a close scrutiny of every piece
the property and his of evidence and analyze each case with
right to intervene. A deliberate precision and unadulterated
fortiori, the thoroughness, the judgment not being diluted by
certificates of title speculations, conjectures and unsubstantiated
covering the subject assertions.
properties were in escheat them in favor of Pasay City
the name of the notwithstanding an allegation that they had been
decedent indicating previously donated. We recall that a motion for
that no transfer of intervention was earlier denied by the escheat
ownership involving court for failure to show "valid claim or right to
the disputed the properties in question." 9 Where a person
properties was ever comes into an escheat proceeding as a claimant,
made by the the burden is on such intervenor to establish his
deceased during her title to the property and his right to intervene. A
lifetime. In the fortiori, the certificates of title covering the
absence therefore of subject properties were in the name of the
any clear and decedent indicating that no transfer of ownership
convincing proof involving the disputed properties was ever made
showing that the by the deceased during her lifetime. In the
subject lands had absence therefore of any clear and convincing
been conveyed by proof showing that the subject lands had been
Hankins to private conveyed by Hankins to private respondent
respondent Solano, Solano, the same still remained, at least before
the same still the escheat, part of the estate of the decedent
remained, at least and the lower court was right not to assume
before the escheat, otherwise. The Court of Appeals therefore cannot
part of the estate of perfunctorily presuppose that the subject
the decedent and the properties were no longer part of the decedent’s
lower court was right estate at the time the lower court handed down
not to assume its decision on the strength of a belated
allegation that the establish his title to the property and his right to
same had previously intervene. A fortiori, the certificates of title
been disposed of by covering the subject properties were in the name
the owner. It is of the decedent indicating that no transfer of
settled that courts ownership involving the disputed properties was
decide only after a ever made by the deceased during her lifetime.
close scrutiny of In the absence therefore of any clear and
every piece of convincing proof showing that the subject lands
evidence and analyze had been conveyed by Hankins to private
each case with respondent Solano, the same still remained, at
deliberate precision least before the escheat, part of the estate of the
and unadulterated decedent and the lower court was right not to
thoroughness, the assume otherwise. The Court of Appeals
judgment not being therefore cannot perfunctorily presuppose that
diluted by the subject properties were no longer part of the
speculations, decedent’s estate at the time the lower court
conjectures and handed down its decision on the strength of a
unsubstantiated belated allegation that the same had previously
assertions. been disposed of by the owner. It is settled that
escheat them in favor courts decide only after a close scrutiny of every
of Pasay City piece of evidence and analyze each case with
notwithstanding an deliberate precision and unadulterated
allegation that they thoroughness, the judgment not being diluted by
had been previously speculations, conjectures and unsubstantiated
donated. We recall assertions.
that a motion for
intervention was
earlier denied by the
escheat court for
failure to show "valid
claim or right to the
properties in
question." 9 Where a
person comes into an
escheat proceeding
as a claimant, the
burden is on such
intervenor to