You are on page 1of 4

President created 33 municipality based on power provided in Sec  Sec 68 of the Admin Code is declared unconstitutional

68 of the Revised Admin Code  Creating municipalities is purely legislative in nature


 1935 expressly limits the power/control of president over LGUs

Pelaez vs Auditor General

Chief of Division of Archives is being compelled to file the AOI of  Just bec his duty is ministerial doesn’t mean he cannot determine
petitioner question of law
Chief doesn’t was to accept bec he said it was not registrable under  May check not just the form but also the lawfulness of purpose
Act 1459:  Determine first the purpose before issuing license
- they want to incorporate to have control over the Bario of  Sure, he can be mandamused since his duty is “ministerial” but
PUlo or San Miguel; use the natural products for this does not take the fact that he can exercise judicial function
institutions, foundations, charitable work for common – and this decision is reviewable
Asuncion vs De Yriate utility – These barrios have no Local Government yet but  The proposed corporation has no right to own or hold such
are under the Municipality of Pasig properties claimed as the are not legal entities by any law; it
- they want to incorporate to administer any property belongs to Municipality of Pasig
under Pasig but in the limits of that barrio

Does he have the authority to decide:


1. sufficiency of form of Articles and lawfulness of the
purpose?
Plebiscite was conducted for the creation of Negros del Norte.  Unconstitutional plebiscite since Loc Gov Code requires (accdg to
It was participated by the voters of the proposed municipality only construction) votes from proposed and new province
What does “”unit or units affected”

Tan vs Comelec
The plebiscite for the Municipality of Tulay na Lupa in Camarines  Voters still need to be from both the parent and new
Norte was held, no votes won municipalties
Was the plebiscite valid? – Yes.
Did the ratification of the 1987 Constitution reive the Paredes ruling
and made the Tan vs Comelec doctrine invalid? –NO.
Padilla vs Comelec

ARMM Regional Assembly created the Province of Shariff  No province can be created without legislative district. Only
Kabunsuan pursuant to the organic act of ARMM Congress through:
Is it valid? – NO. 1. Indirectly thru creation of a province
2. Direct creation of a district upon meeting requirements
Can create Legislative Districts
Sema vs Comelec

Several barangays in Municipality of Bayugan were separated to  Absence of Loc Gov Code is not a hindrance in modifying
form Municipaity of Sibagat by virtue of BP 56 territorial and political subdivisions
Peitioner said the Loc Gov must first be enacted to provide a criteria  It only says that IF there is a Code already, all modifications must
before the new municipality can be created. confirm therein
- Loc Gov Code – Feb 10, 1983  That in the interregnum, plebiscite must be made
Torralba vs Municipality of Sibagat - BP 56 – Feb 1, 1980
Is BP 56 (creating the Sibagay) null and void? – NO.

RA 8535 was enacted creating NOVALICHES (from 15 brgys of QC)  The requirements in the Loc Gov Code are:
Petitioner challenges it for not being compliant wit the Income, 1. Income (20M)
Population and Land Area requirements in Loc Gov Code 2. Population (150k) OR land area
 Compliance with either population or land area PLUS income is
CONSTITUTIONAL sufficient
Samson vs Aguirre
RA 9355 created the Province of Dinagat; approved in plebiscite  BARANGAY – land area is not required indicator of viability
Challenged for compliance to the land area requirement of:  Municipality, City, Provinces – all three are indicators of viability
1. 2000 skm if continuous  If 2 or more islands – exempt from land area requisites
2. need not be contiguous if comprises 2 or more islands

Navarro vs Ermita CREATION OF DINAGAT ISLANDS VALID

RA 7720 was passed converting Municipality of Santiago Isabela  IRA – form; right to be allocated a just share in national taxes
into an Independent Component City (City of Santiago) - This is an item of income; forms part of gross accretion of
Constitutionality assailed bec it did not originate from House and the funds of the LGU; income that LGU can rely on as
did not meet the income requirement source of much needed funds
Petitioners based their argument on the income of Santiago as  ANNUAL INCOME – revenues and receipt realized by the province
Alvarez vs Guingona stated in the Internal Revenue Allotment fro regular sources of Local General Fund including IRA and other
shares
INCOME REQUIREMENT MET; SENATE BILL VALID

League of Cities vs Comelec

EO 386 created the Municipality of Balabangan, which used to be  There can be no de facto corporation
part o f Malabang, Lanao del Sur  The fact that the basis of the EO is declared unconstitutional (Sec
Petitioner challenges the validity of the creation citing Pelaez 68 of Revised Admin Code), no rights or legal basis existed
Respondent avers that this case is different since Balabagan is a De
facto Corporation; created before the court promulgated Pelaez
Malabang vs Benito - Hence, cannot be collaterally attacked and can only be
inquired into directly thru quo warranto

EO IS VOID
EO 107 created the Municipality of Andong in Lanao del Sur (by  Pelaez Doctrine still in effect
virtue of Sec 68 of the Admin Code)  Confusion starts upon enactment of Loc Gov Code of 1991 when
Petitioner want the Court to affirm the validity of the creation of the EOs creating municipalities are not yet judicially annulled
municipality since it metamorphosed into a full-blown municipality  But there’s not such thing as De Facto municipality
- Assails DILG act for not classifying Andong as a regular  All municipalities created under EO are declared void ab initio
Camid vs OP existing municipality upon promulgation of Pelaez
- Pelaez has been modified by supervening events

EO 353 created the Municipal District of San Andres, Quezon  QUO WARRANTO – prerogative writ by which government can
EO 174—san andres gained status of fifth class municipality call upon any person to show what warrant he holds a public
Then it was proposed that it be converted into a municipal district office or exercises a public fanchise
via House Bill 1515; approved
Municipality of San Narciso filed a Quo Waranto Proceeding seeking
Municipality of San Narciso, Quezon vs to declare EO 353 void
Mendez

Municipality of Jimenez vs Baz

Caliwag vs Comelec

You might also like