Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PII: S0927-7765(16)30653-1
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.09.011
Reference: COLSUB 8143
Please cite this article as: Maxine Swee-Li Yee, Poi-Sim Khiew, Wee Siong Chiu,
Yuen Fen Tan, Yih-Yih Kok, Chee-Onn Leong, Green Synthesis of Graphene-Silver
Nanocomposites and Its Application as a Potent Marine Antifouling Agent, Colloids
and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.09.011
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.
As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.
The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof
before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that
apply to the journal pertain.
Highlights
1
Ag nanoparticle
AgNO3,
Citrate
Green hydrothermal
processing
Graphene-Ag (GAg)
Graphene flakes nanocomposite
(from green sonochemical processing)
100
% Biofilm Attachment
80
Potent
marine
60
antifouling
agent
40 *
20 * * All GAg
samples are
* significant
0 * biofilm
inhibitors
Antifouling Samples
Green Synthesis of Graphene-Silver Nanocomposites and Its
Application as a Potent Marine Antifouling Agent
Maxine Swee-Li Yeea,*, Poi-Sim Khiewa,*, Wee Siong Chiub, Yuen Fen Tanc, Yih-Yih
Kokd, Chee-Onn Leonge
a
Centre of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham
Malaysia Campus, Jalan Broga, 43500 Semenyih, Selangor, Malaysia.
b
Low Dimensional Materials Research Center, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University
Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
c
School of Postgraduate Studies, International Medical University, 126 Jalan 19/155B, Bukit Jalil 57000
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
d
School of Health Sciences, International Medical University, 126, Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil,
57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
e
School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, 126 Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil 57000
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
*
Corresponding authors at: Centre of Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials, Faculty of Engineering,
University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Jalan Broga, 43500 Semenyih, Selangor, Malaysia.
E-mail address: kedx2ysn@nottingham.edu.my (M.S-L. Yee), PoiSim.Khiew@nottingham.edu.my (P-S.
Khiew)
Abstract:
Fouling of marine surfaces has been a perpetual problem ever since the days of
the early sailors. The tenacious attachment of seaweed and invertebrates to man-made
surfaces, notably on ship hulls, has incurred undesirable economic losses. Graphene
receives great attention in the materials world for its unique combination of physical
support material, with potent marine antifouling properties. The GAg nanocomposite
while the crystallite size of the silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) was estimated between 1-5
2
nm. The nanocomposite also exhibited the SERS effect. GAg was able to inhibit
little as 1.3 wt % loading of Ag. All GAg samples displayed significant biofilm
inhibition property, with the sample recording the highest Ag loading (4.9 wt.% Ag)
and inhibited the growth of the organisms by more than 80% after 96 h. The marine
antifouling properties of GAg were a synergy of the biocidal AgNPs anchored on the
stable yet flexible graphene sheets, providing maximum active contact surface areas to
3
1. Introduction
The fouling of marine systems occur from the attachment and growth of
biological species on submerged surfaces [1, 2]. The biofouling of marine systems is a
global concern, with economic impact estimated at billions of dollars [2, 3]. The bulk of
hydrodynamic drag, while the associated necessary and frequent hull maintenance
schedules cause extra economic losses [3]. The sequence of fouling events has been
reviewed extensively [4, 5]. A wetted marine surface promptly attracts the settlement of
early bacterial colonies, with the formation of a microbial biofilm within the initial 24
as barnacles [4]. Protective paint coatings for immersed parts of ship hulls include an
antifouling topcoat which usually contains at least one biocidal agent [5]. According to
system should possess the following characteristics: broad spectrum activity, low
mammalian toxicity, low water solubility, does not bio-accumulate in the food chain,
does not persist in the environment, is compatible with paint raw materials, and has a
inhibit and kill multiple drug resistant bacteria, due to their extremely small size and
ability to penetrate bacterial cells [7]. The release of silver ions from the nanoparticles
also enhance their antimicrobial activity [8]. In fact, silver nanoparticles have been
described as the most potent of current antimicrobial agents, while being relatively safe
4
to humans [9]. The shape of silver nanoparticles has also been found to affect their
antimicrobial activity, with truncated triangular-shaped particles being the most potent,
extremely large surface area causes aggregation of the nanoparticles, leading to reduced
efficiency of their antimicrobial properties [11]. One of the strategies to overcome this
surfaces [9, 12-14], zeolite frameworks [15-17] and more recently, on the surfaces of
reduced graphene oxide (rGO) [11, 18-20]. From our previous work, composite
properties by inhibiting the growth of Halomonas pacifica, a marine bacteria [14, 17].
dimensional crystalline structure possessing large specific area and unique electrical
properties [22], various applications have been reported to take advantage of its unique
properties [23]. Graphene has wide applications especially as electrochemical and bio-
sheets has yielded composites with antimicrobial properties [18, 37]. Nanoparticles of
applications in food safety by detecting prohibited food additives [38, 39] and the
presence of toxins [19]. AgNPs on GO sheets have been reported as promising fuel cell
applications [40, 41], whereas the addition of noble bimetallic nanoparticles on GO/rGO
5
antifouling properties of graphene-silver nanomaterials remain scarce. Here, we explore
chemical methods [11, 22, 38, 39, 43-47] or physical methods [48-50]. In most of these
studies, graphene nanomaterials were synthesized using the modified Hummers route,
followed by chemical reduction pathways to form rGO. These production methods use
harsh acids, have multiple processing steps and release toxic gases [51]. Furthermore,
unlike pristine graphene, the rGO surface may be decorated with various functional
groups [24].
This paper presents a novel, facile and green method to produce graphene-silver
work [24]. Our graphene-silver (GAg) composite synthesis method incorporates a low
This technique bypasses the formation of GO. Through a direct exfoliation of graphite,
graphene is produced and used as the substrate for the templated growth of metallic
citrate as a mild reducing agent for the formation of silver nanoparticles on the graphene
bacterium identified as a model biofilm-causing organism [52, 53] as well as the marine
6
2. Experimental
2.1 Materials
Graphite flakes (purity ≥ 98% carbon) were purchased from Bay Carbon Inc.,
USA. Analytical grade silver nitrate (99.9999%) and trisodium citrate dihydrate were
(Baumann et al.) Dobson and Franzmann (ATCC® 27122) was purchased from the
American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and cultured in Zobell Marine Broth 2216
(HiMedia Laboratories, India). All materials were used as received. All reagents were
The GAg nanomaterial was prepared via a 2-step method comprising a sonochemical
Graphene was produced directly from a graphite precursor via a liquid phase exfoliation
of graphite was dispersed in 100 ml mixture of ethanol and deionized water in a 2:3
volume ratio, and sonicated in an ultrasonic bath at room temperature for 3 h to form a
black suspension. The sonicated dispersions were then centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 30
min to remove unexfoliated graphite flakes. The supernatant is then filtered and dried at
7
Graphene (0.2 g) nanomaterial was then redispersed in a 40 ml mixture of ethanol and
deionized water (2:3 volume ratio) under sonication for 30 min. Silver nitrate was added
to the graphene solution and stirred for 30 min in the dark to produce a uniform
solution (0.5 M) were then added to the graphene-silver nitrate mixture and stirred for
15 min. The mixture was transferred to a stainless steel Teflon lined autoclave chamber
and heated in an oven from room temperature to 140C with a ramping rate of 10C.
The temperature was then held at 140C for 6 h before it was allowed to cool down to
room temperature again. The solid precipitation was isolated from the solution by
centrifugation, washed alternatingly with excess water and ethanol for three times each,
8
Table 1: Different mass ratios of graphene to silver precursor in the formation of
graphene-Ag (GAg) nanocomposites. aThe Ag wt % is determined from EDX analyses
of 3 different spots. bThe average size of the Ag nanoparticle supported on graphene
nanosheets is determined from measurements of 100 points.
The GAg and graphene samples were deposited from dispersion onto silicon substrates
for observation under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using the FEI Quanta-400
FESEM and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) microanalysis (Oxford Instruments X-Max,
20mm2 detector). Samples were also viewed under transmission electron microscopy
(TEM) (JEOL JEM-2100F) at an operating voltage of 200 kV. The Raman spectra on
inVia Raman microscope at room temperature. The system is equipped with a CCD
detector and a holographic notch filter, using a 514 nm diode laser excitation source
with power below 0.5 mW. The crystalline property of the samples was measured using
a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer equipped with a 1-D fast detector (Lynx-
Eye) and Cu anode (λ = 0.15406 nm), in the 2θ range from 20 to 80, with
9
2.5 Evaluation of anti-microfouling behaviour against H. pacifica
bacteria [52, 53], as described previously [14, 17]. Briefly, an overnight culture of H.
pacifica in marine broth was seeded into a 96-well plate at an optical density 600 nm
(OD600) of 0.01 in the presence or absence of 0.1 mg/ml GAg. H. pacifica was
incubated under stationary conditions at 26 C for 24 h, after which the medium was
discarded and the plates were washed with water. The wells were then treated with a
0.1% aqueous solution of crystal violet and allowed to stand at room temperature for 30
min. The stained bacteria on the biofilm were washed twice with water and the stain
was solubilized with 30% acetic acid. The solubilized stain was transferred into a fresh
microtiter plate. Biofilm inhibition was quantified by using a Tecan Infinite 200
microplate reader to measure the optical density at 570 nm (OD570). All data was
tertiolecta (LB999) and Isochrysis sp. (CS177), obtained from the culture collection of
published in our previous work [17]. Briefly, ten percent of inoculums (concentration of
0.1 mg/ml) were inoculated into sterilized Provasoli medium with a final volume of 2
mL in a 24-well plate. The treated algal cultures were carried out in triplicates and cell
viability was determined using PrestoBlue® (Life technologies) on a daily basis for 4
10
days. Fluorescent intensity was measured using a monochromater plate reader
(Spectramax M3, Molecular Devices) with excitation and emission wavelengths of 560
Fig. 1: A scheme (not to scale) of the synthesis process for few-layer graphene (FLG)
flakes and hydrothermal reduction process for graphene-Ag nanocomposite formation.
exfoliation method in a mixture of ethanol and deionized water in a 2:3 volume ratio.
The full details of this process has been previously published [24]. The resultant
graphene flakes were redispersed in the ethanol-water mixture to form a dark grey
11
suspension. After the addition of silver nitrate and trisodium citrate, no physical change
was discerned in the suspension. After the completion of the hydrothermal treatment
and subsequent cooling, dark grey to black solid precipitates were sedimented in clear
liquid.
electrons from the citrate reducing agent. Citrate is a well-known reducing agent and
stabilizer in nanoparticle formation [54], directly influencing the particle size and shape
of silver nanoparticles [55] and bimetallic nanoparticles [56] through steric isolation of
individual nanoparticles [57]. The graphene acts as a stable surface to support the
deposition of silver nanoparticles and increasing the active surface area of the
composite.
observed under scanning electron microscopy as shown in Fig. 2. SEM imaging reveals
that the graphene sample consisted of few-layer graphene (FLG) flakes with pristine
the water-ethanol mixture, which gently exfoliates the graphite, resulting in the
preservation of large pieces of pristine graphene on the micron scale [24]. After the
addition of silver nitrate and undergoing hydrothermal reduction with citrate, the Ag
12
particles are supported on the surface of the micron-sized FLG flakes (Fig. 2B-2E). The
chemical composition of the composites were analysed by EDX. The peaks of C and Ag
in the EDX spectrum show only the presence of carbon and silver elements, confirming
the purity of the composite (Fig. 2F). The peak attributed to Si is due to the silicon
substrate used to load the graphene-silver nanocomposite material for analysis. The
amount of Ag loaded on the surface of the graphene flakes was quantitated through the
EDX method as well. The quantity of the precipitated Ag particles supported on the
graphene flakes are concordant with the starting amounts of silver nitrate used, ranging
from 1.3 – 4.9 wt.% Ag (Table 1), indicating that the yield of Ag nanomaterial is
consistent with the stoichiometry as shown in Eq. (1). Additional analysis from SEM
graphene, with the average size of the Ag nanoparticles less than 90 nm (Table 1). The
concentration of 1 to 5 x 10-4 M [55]. Importantly, the integrity and size of the graphene
flakes appear to be retained after the hydrothermal processing and the incorporation of
13
Fig. 2: Scanning electron images of (A) graphene and the graphene-silver composites.
(B) GAg-1 with graphene:silver nitrate weight ratio of 1:3, (C) GAg-2 with
graphene:silver nitrate weight ratio of 1:1, (D) GAg-3 with graphene:silver nitrate
weight ratio of 4:1 and (E) GAg-4 with graphene:silver nitrate weight ratio of 10:1. (F)
Spot analysis of a silver particle on a graphene flake. Silver-graphene dispersions were
dropped onto a silicon substrate for SEM imaging and EDX analysis.
diffraction analysis was performed. The XRD spectra of the GAg materials are shown in
Fig. 3. The graphene sample exhibited relatively broad diffraction peaks at 2 theta
angles of 26.5, 44.5 and 54.6, which corresponded to the (0 0 2), (1 0 1) and (0 0 4)
and graphene possess a similar crystal structure [58]. The GAg samples also exhibited
the characteristic peaks for face-centered cubic (FCC) metallic Ag (ICDD PDF 03-065-
2871) at angles 2 theta of 38.1, 44.3, 64.4 and 77.4. These peaks corresponded to
indicating that metallic silver was successfully formed without the production of other
14
compounds. The presence of the graphene diffraction peaks at 26.5 and 54.7 2 theta
was clearly observed on the diffraction patterns of the GAg samples as well. In addition,
graphite planes was obscured by the relative prominence of the (0 0 2) planes of cubic
Ag. These results clearly show that the crystalline structure of the graphene substrate
Scherrer‟s equation using the diffraction peaks attributed to the Ag planes. The peak
However, besides crystallite size, peak broadening is also attributed to the instrumental
profile and microstrain of the sample [60]. LaB6 was used as a calibration standard to
determine the instrumental profile of the Bruker D8 Advance XRD. The FWHM of
LaB6 over a range from 20-135 2 theta angle is shown in Supplementary Fig. S1. The
instrumental broadening effect for each position can be directly calculated from an
empirical formula obtained from the polynomial equation of the trend line [Eq. (2)].
where y is the FWHM of the instrumental profile, and x is the position in 2. Peak
broadening due to the instrumental contribution at position 2 theta of 38.1 was 0.054.
Using the corrected peak width, B and applying Scherrer‟s equation (Eqs. 3 and 4) led
K
D … Eq. (3)
B cos
15
where D is the crystallite size, K is the Scherrer constant which varies from 0.62-2.08,
is the wavelength of the incident Cu-K alpha wave (0.15406 nm), 2 is the Bragg angle
0.94
DAg … Eq. (4)
[FWHM(sample) FWHM(instrument)] cos
The estimated crystallite sizes for the GAg samples using a single Ag peak at position 2
theta = 38.1 is presented in Supplementary Table S1, with the crystallite sizes
increasing from about 1 nm to 2 nm, concordant with the increasing amounts of silver
precursor.
We also estimated the average crystallite size using the 4 main peaks of the Ag
phase. The Ag crystallites are increasing in size from 1.3 nm for GAg-1 to greater than
4 nm for GAg-3 and up to 4.85 nm for GAg-4 (Supplementary Table S2), with greater
16
+
. Silver (03-065-2871)
+ Graphite 2H (00-041-1487)
. . . .
Relative Intensity (a.u.)
GAg-4 + +
GAg-3
GAg-2
GAg-1
Graphene
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
2 theta ()
(002)
Intensity (a.u.)
Graphite 2H (00-041-1487)
(101) (004)
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
2 theta ()
(111)
Intensity (a.u.)
Silver (03-065-2871)
(004)
(220) (311)
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80
2 theta ()
17
Graphene and GAg-4 nanocomposite samples were observed under transmission
electron microscopy to further elucidate their morphology and structure. Fig. 4A shows
and doping with Ag, the structure of the graphene sheets appears to be retained, with
some slight curling of the graphene edges (Fig. 4B). The scrolling of graphene
distribution across the graphene surface, with the appearance of several large
aggregates. This is most likely due to the highest amount of silver precursor used in
conjunction with the high concentration of citrate used as both reducing agent and
stabilizer. According to Henglein [55], large lumps of Ag are formed through the
detected. This suggests that graphene is a suitable substrate material for supporting the
be 18.1 1.3 nm. At high resolution analysis, the fringe spacing of approximately 0.235
discerned (Fig. 4C). The particles also appeared to have lattice arrangements in different
18
A
30
25
20
15
10
0
< 10
10-19.9
20-29.9
30-39.9
> 40
Diameter (nm)
0.235 nm
C
Fig. 4: (A) TEM image of graphene shows micron-sized pristine few-layer graphene
sheets, (B) TEM image of GAg-4 graphene-silver nanocomposite with Ag nanoparticles
having an average diameter of 18.1 1.3 nm supported on the graphene surface, and (C)
HRTEM image of GAg-4 reveals the lattice spacing corresponding to the (1 1 1) lattice
planes of face-centered cubic Ag.
19
Apart from microscopy techniques which allow surface investigation of the
the number of layers present in the material [62]. Apart from that, Raman spectroscopy
arising from the particular way the molecular vibration in a substance causes a shift in
the wavelength of the incident laser light [38]. In the Raman analysis of graphene, three
characteristic peaks are prominent: the D peak at wavenumber ~1350 cm-1, the G peak
at ~1580 cm-1 and the 2D peak at ~2720 cm-1, as shown in Fig. 5. The D peak arises
primarily from the existence of defects and disorder, particularly the edge defects in
graphene [63]. The 2D band provides information about the number of layers present in
the graphene. Specifically, the broadness of the 2D band indicates the presence of few-
layer graphene, in contrast to monolayer graphene which has a sharp, single Lorentzian
2D peak [62].
The D and G bands of the composite material, with a layer of silver, increased
by 68-fold and 8-fold, respectively, compared with the graphene which did not undergo
processing. This is likely due to the surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) effect
of silver nanoparticles on the graphene surface. The SERS effect originates from the
enhancing the intensity of Raman scattering of the composite material. Resonant light
excitation cause clusters of AgNPs to generate strong localized electric fields at the
particle interfaces, an effect of plasmon coupling [64]. Due to the magnitude of the
signal enhancement observed, the enhancement effect is likely due to the short-range
chemical interactions between silver nanoparticles and graphene. This Raman signal
20
enhancement for graphene-Ag nanomaterial is consistent with the SERS effect
bands within the 500 – 1000 cm-1 region, which are attributed to silver nanoparticles,
can be clearly observed in the spectrum (inset of Fig. 5). The main vibrational bands
were at 555, 667, 743, 776, 807, 830, 890 and 913 cm-1. The SERS spectra of bare
silver nanoparticles from literature [65] display a group of similar weak bands in this
region.
667
Raman Intensity (a.u.)
913
890
555
807
G band
776
743
830
GAg-4
D band
Raman Intensity (a.u.)
800 %
2 D band
6800 %
745 %
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800
Raman Shift (cm-1)
Taken together with the TEM results, the Raman spectroscopy results of
graphene indicate the successful exfoliation of graphite yielding large quantities of few-
21
layer graphene. These results also show the interactions of Ag nanoparticles with the
graphene support.
culminating in the attachment of algae and invertebrates [66]. The classical model of
marine fouling proposed a linear successional progress of fouling species [67], while
more dynamic and probabilistic fouling mechanisms have also been described [68].
Whether the progress of maritime fouling follows the „successional model‟ or the
„dynamic model‟, the presence of bacterial biofilms attract the attachment of spores and
larvae of macrofouling species [1]. Therefore, the disruption of the microbial biofilm is
assay was carried out using H. pacifica, a common marine fouling bacteria. As shown in
Fig. 6, the GAg materials inhibit the attachment of biofilm from H. pacifica after an
incubation period of 24 hours. Fig. 6(a) shows a decrease in the optical density of
crystal violet dye for GAg samples, in contrast to the untreated control and pure
graphene sample. The surface-associated crystal violet dye attaches to the biofilm mass.
biofilm matter. Figure 6(b) revealed that all 4 GAg samples exhibited potent inhibitory
±1.8% for GAg-1, 86.9±1.3% for GAg-2, 95.6±0.1% for GAg-3 and 99.6±0.1% for
GAg-4 (P < 0.05, Student‟s t-test). On the other hand, the graphene material and
22
biofilm from H. pacifica. These results show that graphene and graphene-free bulk
silver on its own does not possess any antifouling quality. However, a minimal doping
directly with the amounts of Ag loading, suggesting that the graphene nanosheets may
promote the antifouling properties of the GAg material by providing a flexible support
for nanosized biocidal AgNPs. The graphene nanosheets are capable of wrapping
around the contours of the bacteria cell, maximizing the contact area between the GAg
material and the bacteria. In addition, the graphene material promotes the formation of
metallic silver.
(A) (B)
† Average OD 100
Control 2.8465
80
% Biofilm Attachment
Graphene 2.8265
60
GAg-1 0.9279
40 *
GAg-2 0.3722
20
*
GAg-3 0.1253 *
0 *
GAg-4 0.0110
Fig. 6: (A) Crystal violet assay results for anti-biofilm activity of GAg materials at 0.1
mg/ml. † indicates the average OD measured at 570 nm, and (B) H. pacifica bacteria
biofilm attachment by GAg materials at 0.1 mg/ml. Bars represent mean ± s.d. of three
independent experiments. * indicates statistical significance compared to control (P <
0.05, Student‟s t-test).
23
Gram-negative bacteria such as H. pacifica have thin peptidoglycan walls, likely
making them more susceptible to AgNPs diffusing in to the microbial cells [14].
Another viable explanation is the dissolution of the bacterial outer cell wall by AgNPs,
causing leakage of vital cellular constituents, leading to cell death [18]. Similar
which had no activity against the microbe [18, 39]. Graphene oxide-silver
GO [69].
The effects of graphene and GAg on the marine microalgae D. tertiolecta and
Isochrysis sp. were evaluated using a microalgal growth inhition assay. As shown in
Fig. 7(A) and 7(B), 0.1 mg/mL of GAg materials inhibited the growth of both
organisms by more than 70% after 96 h of exposure. On the other hand, graphene alone
did not show any inhibitory effects on both microalgae. These results are in contrast to a
previous report that pristine graphene nanoparticles were found to inhibit the growth of
morphological changes in both D. tertiolecta and Isochrysis sp. after exposure to the
GAg materials. The microalgal cells lost membrane integrity and cytoplasm materials
[Fig. 7(C) and 7(D)], suggesting that the effect of GAg is likely to be antiproliferative.
24
D. tertiolecta Isochrysis sp.
(A) (B)
4500
2500 Negative Graphene
Negative Graphene 4000 GAg-1 GAg-2
GAg-1 GAg-2
2000 3500 GAg-3 GAg-4
GAg-3 GAg-4
3000
1500 2500
RFU
RFU
2000
1000
1500
1000
500
500
0 0
0 24 48 72 96 0 24 48 72 96
Hours Hours
(C) (D)
(E) (F)
25
4. Conclusion
reduction process using citrate as a green reducing agent. Graphene is directly produced
from graphite through the facile and low-energy method, without the need of hazardous
were formed on the graphene flakes through a benign hydrothermal process using
trisodium citrate as a green reducing agent. Electron microscopy methods revealed that
processing preserved the quality of the few-layer graphene flakes. The silver
estimated average particles size through TEM observation was less than 20 nm. On the
other hand, the crystallite size of the silver nanoparticles was estimated to range
between 1-5 nm. XRD phase analysis confirms the presence of face-centered cubic Ag
and graphene only, while EDX analysis also corroborates the purity of the samples, with
the detection of only carbon and silver elements present in the samples. Raman
spectroscopy confirmed the interaction of the silver nanoparticles with the graphene
substrate with detection of the SERS effect. The GAg nanocomposite displayed
marine bacteria H. pacifica. Low amounts of silver nanoparticles (1.3 wt.%) supported
on the graphene flakes were able to inhibit the bacteria from forming the fouling
biofilms. All the GAg samples displayed statistically significant biofilm inhibition
26
property. The highest wt.% of Ag loading was associated with a biofilm inhibition of
99.6%. The GAg materials also showed growth inhibitory activity against marine
microalgae D. tertiolecta and Isochrysis sp., compared to both pure graphene and bulk
silver particles, which did not exhibit any significant antifouling properties. Our work
shows that the presence of graphene is vital as it provides a stable and effective support
for the anchoring and growth of Ag nanoparticles. In addition, the flexible sheets of
graphene-Ag nanomaterial are able to improve the contact area and provide an
Acknowledgements
would like to thank the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) Malaysia (MyBrain 15)
References
[1] J.A. Callow and M.E. Callow, Trends in the development of environmentally friendly
fouling-resistant marine coatings, Nature communications, 2 (2011) 244.
[2] M.E. Callow and J.A. Callow, Marine biofouling: a sticky problem, Biologist (London), 49
(2002) 1-5.
[3] M.P. Schultz, J.A. Bendick, E.R. Holm and W.M. Hertel, Economic impact of biofouling on
a naval surface ship, Biofouling, 27 (2010) 87-98.
27
[4] S. Abarzua and S. Jakubowski, Biotechnological investigation for the prevention of
biofouling. I. Biological and biochemical principles for the prevention of biofouling, Mar.
Ecol. Prog. Ser., 123 (1995) 301-312.
[5] A. Lindholdt, K. Dam-Johansen, S.M. Olsen, D.M. Yebra and S. Kiil, Effects of biofouling
development on drag forces of hull coatings for ocean-going ships: a review, Journal of
Coatings Technology and Research, 12 (2015) 415-444.
[6] International_Maritime_Organization, Anti-fouling systems, in: Focus on IMO,
International Maritime Organization, London, 2002, pp. 1-31.
[7] A. Panáček, L. Kvítek, R. Prucek, M. Kolář, R. Večeřová, N. Pizúrová, V.K. Sharma, T.
Nevěčná and R. Zbořil, Silver Colloid Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization, and Their
Antibacterial Activity, J. Phys. Chem. B, 110 (2006) 16248-16253.
[8] M. Rai, A. Yadav and A. Gade, Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials,
Biotechnol. Adv., 27 (2009) 76-83.
[9] P. Dallas, V.K. Sharma and R. Zboril, Silver polymeric nanocomposites as advanced
antimicrobial agents: Classification, synthetic paths, applications, and perspectives, Adv.
Colloid Interface Sci., 166 (2011) 119-135.
[10] S. Pal, Y.K. Tak and J.M. Song, Does the antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles
depend on the shape of the nanoparticle? A study of the gram-negative bacterium
Escherichia coli, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 73 (2007) 1712-1720.
[11] Y. Zhou, J. Yang, T. He, H. Shi, X. Cheng and Y. Lu, Highly Stable and Dispersive Silver
Nanoparticle–Graphene Composites by a Simple and Low-Energy-Consuming Approach and
Their Antimicrobial Activity, Small, 9 (2013) 3445-3454.
[12] A. Travan, E. Marsich, I. Donati, M. Benincasa, M. Giazzon, L. Felisari and S. Paoletti,
Silver–polysaccharide nanocomposite antimicrobial coatings for methacrylic thermosets,
Acta Biomaterialia, 7 (2011) 337-346.
[13] E. Marsich, A. Travan, I. Donati, G. Turco, J. Kulkova, N. Moritz, H.T. Aro, M. Crosera and
S. Paoletti, Biological responses of silver-coated thermosets: An in vitro and in vivo study,
Acta Biomaterialia, 9 (2013) 5088-5099.
[14] M.S.-L. Yee, P.S. Khiew, Y.F. Tan, Y.-Y. Kok, K.W. Cheong, W.S. Chiu and C.-O. Leong,
Potent antifouling silver-polymer nanocomposite microspheres using ion-exchange resin as
templating matrix, Colloids Surf., A, 457 (2014) 382-391.
[15] D.L. Boschetto, L. Lerin, R. Cansian, S.B.C. Pergher and M. Di Luccio, Preparation and
antimicrobial activity of polyethylene composite films with silver exchanged zeolite-Y, Chem.
Eng. J., 204–206 (2012) 210-216.
[16] R.S. Bedi, R. Cai, C. O’Neill, D.E. Beving, S. Foster, S. Guthrie, W. Chen and Y. Yan,
Hydrophilic and antimicrobial Ag-exchanged zeolite a coatings: A year-long durability study
and preliminary evidence for their general microbiocidal efficacy to bacteria, fungus and
yeast, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 151 (2012) 352-357.
[17] M.S.-L. Yee, P.S. Khiew, Y.F. Tan, W.S. Chiu, Y.-Y. Kok and C.-O. Leong, Low
Temperature, Rapid Solution Growth of Antifouling Silver-Zeolite Nanocomposite Clusters,
Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 218 (2015) 69-78.
[18] M.R. Das, R.K. Sarma, S.C. Borah, R. Kumari, R. Saikia, A.B. Deshmukh, M.V. Shelke, P.
Sengupta, S. Szunerits and R. Boukherroub, The synthesis of citrate-modified silver
nanoparticles in an aqueous suspension of graphene oxide nanosheets and their
antibacterial activity, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 105 (2013) 128-136.
[19] M.L. Yola, V.K. Gupta and N. Atar, New molecular imprinted voltammetric sensor for
determination of ochratoxin A, Materials Science and Engineering: C, 61 (2016) 368-375.
[20] M.L. Yola, V.K. Gupta, T. Eren, A.E. Şen and N. Atar, A novel electro analytical
nanosensor based on graphene oxide/silver nanoparticles for simultaneous determination of
quercetin and morin, Electrochimica Acta, 120 (2014) 204-211.
28
[21] K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, S.V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y. Zhang, S.V. Dubonos, I.V.
Grigorieva and A.A. Firsov, Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films, Science, 306
(2004) 666-669.
[22] H.-W. Tien, Y.-L. Huang, S.-Y. Yang, J.-Y. Wang and C.-C.M. Ma, The production of
graphene nanosheets decorated with silver nanoparticles for use in transparent, conductive
films, Carbon, 49 (2011) 1550-1560.
[23] A.K. Geim and K.S. Novoselov, The rise of graphene, Nat Mater, 6 (2007) 183-191.
[24] J.S.Y. Chia, M.T.T. Tan, P.S. Khiew, J.K. Chin, H. Lee, D.C.S. Bien and C.W. Siong, A novel
one step synthesis of graphene via sonochemical-assisted solvent exfoliation approach for
electrochemical sensing application, Chemical Engineering Journal, 249 (2014) 270-278.
[25] J.S.Y. Chia, M.T.T. Tan, P.S. Khiew, J.K. Chin and C.W. Siong, A bio-electrochemical
sensing platform for glucose based on irreversible, non-covalent pi–pi functionalization of
graphene produced via a novel, green synthesis method, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical,
210 (2015) 558-565.
[26] G. Kotan, F. Kardas, O.A. Yokus, O. Akyldrm, H. Saral, T. Eren, M.L. Yola and N. Atar, A
novel determination of curcumin via Ru@Au nanoparticle decorated nitrogen and sulfur-
functionalized reduced graphene oxide nanomaterials, Analytical Methods, 8 (2016) 401-
408.
[27] M.L. Yola, T. Eren and N. Atar, A novel and sensitive electrochemical DNA biosensor
based on Fe@Au nanoparticles decorated graphene oxide, Electrochimica Acta, 125 (2014)
38-47.
[28] V.K. Gupta, N. Atar, M.L. Yola, Z. Üstündağ and L. Uzun, A novel magnetic Fe@Au core–
shell nanoparticles anchored graphene oxide recyclable nanocatalyst for the reduction of
nitrophenol compounds, Water Research, 48 (2014) 210-217.
[29] M.L. Yola, N. Atar, Z. Üstündağ and A.O. Solak, A novel voltammetric sensor based on p-
aminothiophenol functionalized graphene oxide/gold nanoparticles for determining
quercetin in the presence of ascorbic acid, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 698 (2013)
9-16.
[30] V.K. Gupta, N. Atar, M.L. Yola, M. Eryılmaz, H. Torul, U. Tamer, İ.H. Boyacı and Z.
Üstündağ, A novel glucose biosensor platform based on Ag@AuNPs modified graphene oxide
nanocomposite and SERS application, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 406 (2013)
231-237.
[31] V.K. Gupta, M.L. Yola, M.S. Qureshi, A.O. Solak, N. Atar and Z. Üstündağ, A novel
impedimetric biosensor based on graphene oxide/gold nanoplatform for detection of DNA
arrays, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 188 (2013) 1201-1211.
[32] M.L. Yola, T. Eren and N. Atar, A sensitive molecular imprinted electrochemical sensor
based on gold nanoparticles decorated graphene oxide: Application to selective
determination of tyrosine in milk, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 210 (2015) 149-157.
[33] M.L. Yola, N. Atar, T. Eren, H. Karimi-Maleh and S. Wang, Sensitive and selective
determination of aqueous triclosan based on gold nanoparticles on
polyoxometalate/reduced graphene oxide nanohybrid, RSC Advances, 5 (2015) 65953-65962.
[34] N. Atar, T. Eren, M.L. Yola, H. Karimi-Maleh and B. Demirdogen, Magnetic iron oxide
and iron oxide@gold nanoparticle anchored nitrogen and sulfur-functionalized reduced
graphene oxide electrocatalyst for methanol oxidation, RSC Advances, 5 (2015) 26402-26409.
[35] N. Atar, T. Eren, M.L. Yola, H. Gerengi and S. Wang, Fe@Ag nanoparticles decorated
reduced graphene oxide as ultrahigh capacity anode material for lithium-ion battery, Ionics,
21 (2015) 3185-3192.
[36] F. Lorestani, Z. Shahnavaz, P. Mn, Y. Alias and N.S.A. Manan, One-step hydrothermal
green synthesis of silver nanoparticle-carbon nanotube reduced-graphene oxide composite
29
and its application as hydrogen peroxide sensor, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 208
(2015) 389-398.
[37] D. Gu, X. Chang, X. Zhai, S. Sun, Z. Li, T. Liu, L. Dong and Y. Yin, Efficient synthesis of
silver-reduced graphene oxide composites with prolonged antibacterial effects, Ceramics
International, (2016).
[38] Y. Xie, Y. Li, L. Niu, H. Wang, H. Qian and W. Yao, A novel surface-enhanced Raman
scattering sensor to detect prohibited colorants in food by graphene/silver nanocomposite,
Talanta, 100 (2012) 32-37.
[39] S.V. Kumar, N.M. Huang, H.N. Lim, M. Zainy, I. Harrison and C.H. Chia, Preparation of
highly water dispersible functional graphene/silver nanocomposite for the detection of
melamine, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 181 (2013) 885-893.
[40] V.K. Gupta, M.L. Yola, N. Atar, Z. Üstündağ and A.O. Solak, Electrochemical studies on
graphene oxide-supported metallic and bimetallic nanoparticles for fuel cell applications,
Journal of Molecular Liquids, 191 (2014) 172-176.
[41] N. Atar, T. Eren, B. Demirdögen, M.L. Yola and M.O. Çağlayan, Silver, gold, and
silver@gold nanoparticle-anchored l-cysteine-functionalized reduced graphene oxide as
electrocatalyst for methanol oxidation, Ionics, 21 (2015) 2285-2293.
[42] N. Atar, M.L. Yola and T. Eren, Sensitive determination of citrinin based on molecular
imprinted electrochemical sensor, Applied Surface Science, 362 (2016) 315-322.
[43] C. Xu, X. Wang and J. Zhu, Graphene−Metal Particle Nanocomposites, The Journal of
Physical Chemistry C, 112 (2008) 19841-19845.
[44] R. Pasricha, S. Gupta and A.K. Srivastava, A Facile and Novel Synthesis of Ag–Graphene-
Based Nanocomposites, Small, 5 (2009) 2253-2259.
[45] J. Shen, M. Shi, N. Li, B. Yan, H. Ma, Y. Hu and M. Ye, Facile synthesis and application of
Ag-chemically converted graphene nanocomposite, Nano Res., 3 (2010) 339-349.
[46] K.S. Subrahmanyam, A.K. Manna, S.K. Pati and C.N.R. Rao, A study of graphene
decorated with metal nanoparticles, Chemical Physics Letters, 497 (2010) 70-75.
[47] H.-W. Tien, S.-T. Hsiao, W.-H. Liao, Y.-H. Yu, F.-C. Lin, Y.-S. Wang, S.-M. Li and C.-C.M.
Ma, Using self-assembly to prepare a graphene-silver nanowire hybrid film that is
transparent and electrically conductive, Carbon, 58 (2013) 198-207.
[48] S. Liu, J. Tian, L. Wang and X. Sun, Microwave-assisted rapid synthesis of Ag
nanoparticles/graphene nanosheet composites and their application for hydrogen peroxide
detection, J Nanopart Res, 13 (2011) 4539-4548.
[49] X.-Z. Tang, Z. Cao, H.-B. Zhang, J. Liu and Z.-Z. Yu, Growth of silver nanocrystals on
graphene by simultaneous reduction of graphene oxide and silver ions with a rapid and
efficient one-step approach, Chemical Communications, 47 (2011) 3084-3086.
[50] M. Zainy, N.M. Huang, S. Vijay Kumar, H.N. Lim, C.H. Chia and I. Harrison, Simple and
scalable preparation of reduced graphene oxide–silver nanocomposites via rapid thermal
treatment, Materials Letters, 89 (2012) 180-183.
[51] W. Gao, Chapter 15: Graphite Oxide, in: R.E. Vajtai (Ed.) Springer Handbook of
Nanomaterials, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 571-604.
[52] D.P. Bakker, J.W. Klijnstra, H.J. Busscher and H.C. van der Mei, The effect of dissolved
organic carbon on bacterial adhesion to conditioning films adsorbed on glass from natural
seawater collected during different seasons, Biofouling, 19 (2003) 391-397.
[53] C. Melander, P.D.R. Moeller, T.E. Ballard, J.J. Richards, R.W. Huigens and J. Cavanagh,
Evaluation of dihydrooroidin as an antifouling additive in marine paint, Int. Biodeterior.
Biodegrad., 63 (2009) 529-532.
[54] Z.S. Pillai and P.V. Kamat, What factors control the size and shape of silver
nanoparticles in the citrate ion reduction method?, J. Phys. Chem. B, 108 (2004) 945-951.
30
[55] A. Henglein and M. Giersig, Formation of Colloidal Silver Nanoparticles: Capping Action
of Citrate, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 103 (1999) 9533-9539.
[56] Z. Zhang, T.M. Nenoff, J.Y. Huang, D.T. Berry and P.P. Provencio, Room Temperature
Synthesis of Thermally Immiscible Ag−Ni Nanoalloys, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C,
113 (2009) 1155-1159.
[57] Z. Zhang, T.M. Nenoff, K. Leung, S.R. Ferreira, J.Y. Huang, D.T. Berry, P.P. Provencio and
R. Stumpf, Room-Temperature Synthesis of Ag−Ni and Pd−Ni Alloy Nanoparticles, The
Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 114 (2010) 14309-14318.
[58] J. Guo, T. Zhang, C. Hu and L. Fu, A three-dimensional nitrogen-doped graphene
structure: a highly efficient carrier of enzymes for biosensors, Nanoscale, 7 (2015) 1290-
1295.
[59] J.I. Langford and A.J.C. Wilson, Scherrer after sixty years: A survey and some new
results in the determination of crystallite size, Journal of Applied Crystallography, 11 (1978)
102-113.
[60] E.J. Mittemeijer and U. Welzel, The "state of the art" of the diffraction analysis of
crystallite size and lattice strain, Z Kristallogr, 223 (2008) 552-560.
[61] W. Xialie, W. Xiaohong, L. Zhanpeng, T. Yi, Y. Ye and Z. Ping, Rapid and efficient
synthesis of soluble graphene nanosheets using N -methyl- p -aminophenol sulfate as a
reducing agent, Nanotechnology, 23 (2012) 485604.
[62] L.M. Malard, M.A. Pimenta, G. Dresselhaus and M.S. Dresselhaus, Raman spectroscopy
in graphene, Physics Reports, 473 (2009) 51-87.
[63] Z. Xu and G. Hu, Simple and green synthesis of monodisperse silver nanoparticles and
surface-enhanced Raman scattering activity, RSC Advances, 2 (2012) 11404-11409.
[64] Y. Zhang, B. Walkenfort, J.H. Yoon, S. Schlucker and W. Xie, Gold and silver nanoparticle
monomers are non-SERS-active: a negative experimental study with silica-encapsulated
Raman-reporter-coated metal colloids, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 17 (2015)
21120-21126.
[65] G. Naja, P. Bouvrette, S. Hrapovic and J.H.T. Luong, Raman-based detection of bacteria
using silver nanoparticles conjugated with antibodies, Analyst, 132 (2007) 679-686.
[66] G. Zanaroli, A. Negroni, C. Calisti, M. Ruzzi and F. Fava, Selection of commercial
hydrolytic enzymes with potential antifouling activity in marine environments, Enzyme
Microb. Technol., 49 (2011) 574-579.
[67] L.D. Chambers, K.R. Stokes, F.C. Walsh and R.J.K. Wood, Modern approaches to marine
antifouling coatings, Surface & Coatings Technology, (2006) 3642-3652.
[68] D. Rittschof, Research on Practical Environmentally Benign Antifouling Coatings, in: S.
Dürr, J.C. Thomason (Eds.) Biofouling, Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 396 - 409.
[69] C. Li, X. Wang, F. Chen, C. Zhang, X. Zhi, K. Wang and D. Cui, The antifungal activity of
graphene oxide–silver nanocomposites, Biomaterials, 34 (2013) 3882-3890.
[70] C. Pretti, M. Oliva, R.D. Pietro, G. Monni, G. Cevasco, F. Chiellini, C. Pomelli and C.
Chiappe, Ecotoxicity of pristine graphene to marine organisms, Ecotoxicology and
Environmental Safety, 101 (2014) 138-145.
[71] J. Ren, P. Han, H. Wei and L. Jia, Fouling-Resistant Behavior of Silver Nanoparticle-
Modified Surfaces against the Bioadhesion of Microalgae, ACS Applied Materials &
Interfaces, 6 (2014) 3829-3838.
31