Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In planning for this lesson, students typically experience difficulty or have misconceptions using the accurate pieces
of the problem to set up a correct proportion or equation to represent the problem at hand. Quite often, students
interchange the discount and the sales price incorrectly as well. In planning for these concerns, Ms. Fricke plans to
receive each of her students’ current thoughts and answers to each of the problems presented to them during the
class period by utilizing the NearPod activity. Based upon the information acquired from this tool, Ms. Fricke will
point out the typical errors being made by the students in real time, or if the students are demonstrating
understanding and accuracy of the problems at hand, elect to continue progressing along within her planned
lesson. This process will allow both the students and Ms. Fricke with the opportunity to fine tune any
misconceptions throughout the entire class period.
Ms. Fricke demonstrated an expectation that her students fully understand the concepts at hand, as evident from
the following observations. Ms. Fricke patiently accepted different student answers to the various problems
discussed during the class period. To elicit these various student responses, Ms. Fricke was heard asking, “Can
you explain?” “Why?” “Wow, I didn’t do it that way, very good. Did anyone else do this differently?” Additionally,
towards the end of the class period, Ms. Fricke even withheld providing the answer to a student’s question after
allowing multiple students attempt to answer the question at hand. She concluded the period and this
conversation by informing her students that they would have the opportunity to continue thinking about as well as
answer this question during the next class period.
Smooth and efficient procedures and transitions where utilized throughout the entire class period resulting in little
to no loss of instructional time, as evident from the following observations. Through the use of a previously
prepared NearPod presentation, Ms. Fricke smoothly progressed from one activity to the next seamlessly. To begin
the class period, Ms. Fricke posted a class code that allowed students to access this presentation directly on their
iPad. Within this presentation, each student was provided with an answer key to the homework that they could
easily zoom in or move around for a clearer view, all of the problems worked on during the class period, as well as
a method of sharing and submitting their answers to their teacher. As a result of using this technology, Ms. Fricke
was able to immediately and easily display selected student work, or all of the submitted student responses,
anonymously or by student name.
Ms. Fricke regularly expected that her students fully explain or justify their answers as evident from the questions
she asked her students during the class period. For example, Ms. Fricke asked, “Ok, where did you get the 80%
from?” “Ok, why are you allowed to do that?” “Why wouldn’t $18 be the sales price?” and “If we wanted to take
your proportion and put a different number where your 15 is, could we put something else there?” In the middle of
the class period, one student asked Ms. Fricke, “What is the way that most students find discount?” Ms. Fricke
responded to this interesting student question in a whole class conversation. As discussed in our post conference,
this was an excellent opportunity to have all students think about and focus on the main objective of the lesson.
Consider providing time for all of the students to answer this question individually or with a partner, and possibly
using the NearPod activity as well. This expectation for each student will hold them all individually accountable for
thinking about, and hopefully being able to explain the objective for the class period.
Students were engaged throughout the entire class period, either by working on different examples at their seats
individually or with classmates, comparing their work with the presented procedures and answers that were
shared anonymously within their iPad “NearPod” presentation, or thinking about or listening to different
explanations for the completed problems. By utilizing the NearPod activity, where each student had their own iPad,
each student was constantly held accountable for not only remaining focused on the task at hand, but also sharing
information that could be viewed by both their teacher and their peers. During the lesson, students were asked to
complete work at their seats and to submit their answers and full work through the NearPod lesson. As a result,
Ms. Fricke formatively assessed of her students’ knowledge throughout the lesson to gauge her response to her
students work as well as which task to assign next.