Item /refence clause Heading

Chapter 15 Waste management strategy

Chapter 16 Waste management strategy

Chapter 17 Waste management strategy

Chapter 18 Waste management strategy

Chapter 19 Waste management strategy

Chapter 20 Waste management strategy

Chapter 21 Waste management strategy

Chapter 22 Waste management strategy

Chapter 23 Waste management strategy

Chapter 24 Waste management strategy

Chapter 25 Waste management strategy

Chapter 26 Waste management strategy

Chapter 27 Waste management strategy

comment Proposed Action

The waste generation rates made for the museum

are significantly higher that what would be
expected for a museum of this size. Currently and
estimated 1500 tonnes per year have been
calculated and designed for. In comparison against a
benchmark museum with a visitor base of between
5-6 million visitors per year, a generation rate of
around 600-700 tonnes is expected; Revise based on visitor numbers expected
The report does not outline any other waste
management options that have been considered Provide outline commentary on any options
and/or rejected appraisal

It is not clear whether any bench line work has

been carried out on exiting museums in Doha or
whether QMA have been consulted, with regard to
any specific requirements the authority may
require; Confirm

Whilst basic details on hazardous waste

management are given. The potential for
generation of chemical waste from art restoration
works is possible and should be detailed Detail

The municipal department responsible for waste

management does not appear to have been
contacted – General Cleaning Project who issue
waste permits Detail any contact or correspondence

There is no indication of a review external waste

treatment infrastructure constraints or capabilities Detail

The solution to storing two compactors and moving

one out on a dolly is questionable. Although
potentially workable it is inefficient and liable to Are there any case study examples? Produce
significant issues in the event of mechanical failure. diagram showing cycle of operations
There appears to be no storage for reusable
artworks packaging crates; Highlight location or reference
There appears to be no confirmation on the roof
clearance in loading dock Confirm roof clearance

The waste section suggested the use of 1100lt

Eurobins internally for intermediate storage and
movement of waste. Such bins are not
recommended due to their size and
manoeuvrability Comment only
The loading dock has not made provision for
storage of spare bins or an area for bin wash down.
It may be possible this is happening offsite. Highlight location or reference
No potential waste contractors have been identified
as detailed in the scope; Highlight any corrsespondance

The feasibility of integrating the museum with an

adjacent Pneumatic Waste Collection Systems has
not been detailed as detailed in the scope Detail assessment
Owner

Arup

Arup

Arup

Arup

Arup

Arup

Arup

Arup

Arup

Arup
Arup

Arup

Arup