You are on page 1of 8

Collaborative Marketing: A Study to Increase Indonesian Fish

Consumption
Tondi Sudaryo1, Imas Nurzanah2, Impo Philipus Sitindaon3,
Ira Tutia4, and Zefanya Alanza Christabel Loveldy5
1
Jurusan Administrasi Niaga, Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung 40012
E-mail: tondi.sudaryo.mpem415@polban.ac.id
2
Jurusan Administrasi Niaga, Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung 40012
E-mail: imas.nurzanah.mpem415@polban.ac.id
3
Jurusan Administrasi Niaga, Politeknik Negeri Bandung 40012
E-mail:impo.philippus.mpem415@polban.ac.id
4
Jurusan Administrasi Niaga, Politeknik Negeri Bandung 40012
E-mail: ira.tutia.mpem415@polban.ac.id
5
Jurusan Administrasi Niaga, Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung 40012
E-mail: zefanya.alanza.mpem415@polban.ac.id

ABSTRACT

Even though Indonesia, as a maritime country, has high potency in fish production, its consumption is still very
low. Different from Singapore and Malaysia which have high fish consumption level in 70 to 80 kg per capita
per year. Fish consumption can be caused by several factors such as fish attributes (taste, appearance, odor, and
price), consumer awareness, subjective norms, and consumption intention. The effect of these variables on
consumption intention and consumption behavior is the primary focus of this paper. By using the method of
distributing questionnaires to 400 respondents around Bandung Raya, the results show that there is an influence
between two dimensions of the fish attributes, namely taste and odor, and also consumer awareness and
subjective norms variable to consumption intention and behavior. Based on the findings, the results of this study
explain the variables that affect the consumption intention and behavior, also its implication in Indonesia.

Keywords

Fish Attribute, Consumer Awareness, Subjective Norm, Fish Consumption, Intention, Behavior

1. BACKGROUND Indonesia is still relatively low. Secretary-General


of the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries said
As a maritime country, Indonesia has a "Indonesia consumes only 41 kg per capita per
great potency in the marine sector. In fact, year, which is relatively lower than Singapore 80
according to Ministry of Marine Affairs and kg per capita per year, Malaysia 70 kilograms per
Fisheries, Indonesia is known as one of the capita per year and Japan nearly 100 kg per capita
fisheries world paradises. The Food and per year.
Agriculture Organization (FAO) explains that
Indonesia produces 6 million tons of fisheries by Whereas, fish is one food that has a
2014. It makes Indonesia becomes the second reasonably complete nutritional composition [1].
largest fish producer under China with production Fish are rich in nutrients mainly protein, minerals
reaching 14 million tons by 2014. However, behind and fats, as well as the largest producers of
the very high production, fish consumption in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), especially
eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic consumption behavior is primarily influenced by
(DHA), which are beneficial to health [2]. Thus, consumption intention, which is shaped by
consuming fish 1-2 times per week, especially fish consumers’ attitudes, subjective norms (i.e.,
containing high EPA and DHA can reduce the risk influences from individual’s social environment),
of heart disease until 36% [3]. Moreover, the and perceived behavioral control which is related to
essential fatty acids are indispensable in the consumer awareness. Besides, the intention of
formation of brain cells to increase the level of eating healthy foods is an important factor in
intelligence [4]. Apart from fish is relatively explaining the frequency of consuming fish [6].
cheaper than beef and chicken, fish protein The pattern of fish consumption is also influenced
absorption is higher than other animal products by several factors such as taste, price, appearance,
such as beef and chicken because fish has shorter and odor as fish attributes [7, 8]. So, the variables
protein fibers than beef or chicken protein fibers used in this study are fish attributes, consumer
[1]. awareness, subjective norm, and consumption
intention.
Since fish contain many benefits and the
consumption is very low, the Indonesian 2.1 Fish Attribute
government, through the National Coordination
Meeting conducted by the Ministry of Marine Product attribute is a component that is the
Affairs and Fisheries, even supports and nature of the product that ensures that the product
emphasizes the importance of eating fish. One form can meet needs and desires expected by the buyer
of the government’s efforts is by performing a [9, 10]. Product attributes can be tangible or
program of Gerakan Memasyarakatkan Makan intangible, and those are elements of products that
Ikan or abbreviated as GEMARIKAN for the are considered important by consumers as the basis
movement of the fish-loving campaign. In addition, for making purchasing decisions [11]. Based on
Forum Peningkatan Konsumsi Ikan Nasional these notions, it can be concluded that attributes are
(FORIKAN) is established in every province in important factors that can affect consumer’s
Indonesia as one of the provincial unit institutions intention or behavior in consuming. It happens
supporting the program of GEMARIKAN itself. because the quality characteristics of a product that
For these reasons, research to explore causes that consumers want can be obtained through the
induce low fish consumption is necessarily needed. assessment of consumer behavior based on the
The objective of this study is to examine and concept of product attribute concept [12].
discuss the association between independent and
Attributes in fish products include taste,
dependent variables. Independent variables used in
appearance, odor, and price [7, 8]. The taste of food
this study are the fish attribute, consumer
is affected by the components contained in foods
awareness, and subjective norm. Fish attribute itself
such as proteins, fats, and carbohydrates. Food with
is divided into four dimensions, namely taste,
high protein content is excellent in consumption as
appearance, odor, and price. Those variables will
in fish that also has saturated fat with healthy fish
be measured to identify factors that have a
oil content. Moreover, functional characteristics of
significant association with fish consumption
protein from food affect the quality of a food
intention and behavior as the dependent variable.
product [13]. Although demand for fish
Also, the influence of consumption intention on
consumption increases with regard to health
consumption behavior itself will also be measured.
benefits, fish consumption also still has some
Thereafter, further discussion about the factors
barriers such as high prices, lack of product
improvement to increase Indonesian fish
standardization, and quality control issues in the
consumption and its implication will also be
production chain. It is important to consider that in
undertaken.
the study of the perception of fish consumption in
2. LITERATURE REVIEW regions where fish have a high price, this attribute
becomes a limiting factor for consumption [8].
In trying to understand food consumption Research has shed light on consumer’s motives and
behavior, the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) barriers to fish consumption, and the price is the
[5], is a model that has frequently been used to most important factor [6]. Appearance attributes in
explain consumer choices. This theory reveals that food are particularly important in allowing
consumers to categorize a product as familiar or the subjective norm has a role in shaping one's
unfamiliar, normal or abnormal, and desirable or behavior including regarding consuming fish.
undesirable. The appearance of food that is
interesting when presented will stimulate the senses 2.4 Consumption Intention
associated with the taste of food that is primarily
Consumption intention is a situation where
the sense of sight [7]. A study on consumer
a person wants or desire to buy some products
attitudes conducted in Italy has reported that
implicitly or explicitly that leads to a behavior that
consumers decide which fish to buy based on its
is expected to be done [21, 22]. Also, behavioral
appearance, odor, a point of sale hygiene and
intention is determined by attitudes, subjective
geographic origin [14].
norms and conscious behavior control [23].
2.2 Consumer Awareness Further, it is stated that consumption intention
influences consumer buying behavior. This is
To increase consumption, increasing supported in a study by Fishbein and Ajzen which
consumer awareness becomes the main focus. states that individual behavior is based on
Consumer awareness is an affiliation by the range consumption intention by putting forward the
of which awareness consumers to their pattern of rational behavior [24]. In addition, the
responsibilities and appropriate in the marketplace. stronger intention of a person to display certain
This theory is also supported by literature that behavior, it influences more likely the behavior that
mentions consumer awareness means building will be done [25]. It supports consumer
awareness of a consumer against their consumption patterns on goods and services,
responsibilities and appropriate [15]. Consumer including in terms of consuming fish. If the
awareness can be affected by the surrounding intention of fish consumption in a person is very
environment [16]. So, the consumer’s environment strong, the behavior to consume fish will be very
will influence behavior in consumer awareness, possible to do.
because an existing environment increases the
desire of consumers to want to have what is Taste

perceived as a consideration to adjust from what is


Appearance
around it. Besides, consumer awareness also affects
their consumption intention, because consumer’s Odour

knowledge will build their awareness that leads to H1


Price Consumption
an intention to consume [17]. Intention

H3
2.3 Subjective Norm H2
Consumer
Consumption
Awareness
Subjective norm is the perceived social Behaviour

pressure as a motivation to follow the views of


others or to conduct specific behavior [5, 18]. Subjective
Norm
Subjective norm relates to theories proposed by
Martin Fishbein and Ajzen of Theory of Reasoned
Figure 1. Research Model
Action, which describe beliefs, attitude, intention,
and behavior. Where attention is focused is when Hypothesis 1. Taste, appearance, odor, price,
considering the interests of a thing as well as consumer awareness, and subjective norm have a
subjective attitudes and norms that become the positive and significant effect on consumption
determination of the will or intention [19]. Also, intention.
one of the things that influence behavior other than
the attitude specifically to something is the Hypothesis 2. Taste, appearance, odor, price,
subjective norms themselves. In other words, the consumer awareness, and subjective norm have a
subjective norm will give a belief to someone positive and significant effect on consumption
which is somebody else influences by other people behavior.
or external factors, that will encourage or prevent
behavior that will be done [20]. So, it can be said if Hypothesis 3. Consumption intention has a
positive and significant effect on consumption
behavior.
3. RESEARCH METHOD Table 2. Hypothesis Test 1
Pearson Significant
Variable/Dimension
Research design which is suitable for the Correlation Value
topic of this study is causal. The design is a method Taste 0.650 0.000*
for collecting and processing data to help the Appearance 0.500 0.106
researcher understand the correlation between Odor 0.606 0.000*
variables [26]. Quantitative data is the data that is Price 0.332 0.943
Consumer Awareness 0.471 0.023*
used in this study. Moreover, the data collected are
Subjective Norm 0.394 0.000*
primary data obtained directly through
questionnaires distributed to 400 respondents who
are divided into four classifications based on age. From the data analysis of Hypothesis 1 in
The first is children who are less than 12 years old. Table 2, it results that appearance has Pearson
The second classification is teenagers with an age correlation value of 0.500 and significant value of
range of 12-25 years old. The third are adults with 0.106 (p > 0.05). Price has Pearson correlation
an age range of 26-45 years old. Lastly, there are value of 0.332 and significant value of 0.943 ( p >
the elderly who are more than 45 years old. 0.05). It means that appearance and price do not
have a positive and significant effect on
After collecting the data, the next step is consumption intention. Meanwhile, the Pearson
calculating and analyzing the data by using SPSS. correlation value of taste is 0.650 with the
The method for this calculation is regression significant value of 0.000 (p < 0.05). Odor has
analysis to know the correlation between Pearson correlation value of 0.606 and significant
independent variables and dependent variable [27].
value of 0.000 (p < 0.05). Consumer awareness has
Pearson correlation value of 0.471 and significant
4. DATA ANALYSIS
value of 0.023 (p < 0.05). Lastly, the Pearson
The result of data analysis will be explained in correlation value of subjective norm is 0.394 with
this section. Researchers use data obtained from significant value of 0.000 (p < 0.05). Therefore, it
400 respondents classified into 183 men and 217 shows that factors which have a positive and
women by distributing a questionnaire in Bandung. significant effect on consumption intention are
Details of respondent data are shown in Table 1 taste, odor, consumer awareness, and subjective
below. norm.

Table 1. Descriptive Analysis Tabel 3. Hypothesis Test 2


Variable Description Frequency % Pearson Significant
Variable/Dimension
Gender Male 183 45.8 Correlation Value
Female 217 54.3 Taste 0.681 0.000*
Age < 12 years 6 1.5 Appearance 0.520 0.384
12-25 years 289 72.3 Odor 0.703 0.000*
26-45 years 64 16.0 Price 0.329 0.680
> 45 years 41 10.3
Consumer Awareness 0.348 0.011*
Education Primary school 10 2.5
Junior high school 11 2.8 Subjective Norm 0.344 0.000*
Senior high school 207 51.7
College 172 43.0
Occupation Civil servant 24 6.0 From the data analysis of Hypothesis 2 in
Private employees 102 25.5 Table 3, it results that appearance has Pearson
Entrepreneur 26 6.5 correlation value of 0.520 and significant value of
Student 228 57.0
0.384 (p > 0.05). Price has Pearson correlation
Others 20 5.0
Income < 1,000,000 IDR 167 41.8 value of 0.329 and significant value of 0.680 ( p >
1,000,000 - 0.05). It means that appearance and price do not
85 21.3 have a positive and significant effect on
2,500,000 IDR
2,500,000 - consumption behavior. Meanwhile, the Pearson
88 22.0
5,000,000 IDR correlation value of taste is 0.681 with the
> 5,000,000 IDR 60 15.0
significant value of 0.000 (p < 0.05). Odor has
Pearson correlation value of 0.703 and significant
value of 0.000 (p < 0.05). Consumer awareness has
Pearson correlation value of 0.348 and significant consumption [33]. Moreover, a study about fish
value of 0.011 (p < 0.05). Lastly, the Pearson consumption in Yogyakarta indicates that the
correlation value of subjective norm is 0.344 with consumers are not price sensitive because they
significant value of 0.000 (p < 0.05). Therefore, it already have an understanding of health and
shows that factors which have a positive and healthy food [34]. Therefore, consumers are willing
significant effect on consumption behavior are to pay more to get healthy and high-quality food.
taste, odor, consumer awareness, and subjective
norm. Along with taste and odor, consumer
awareness also indicates a significant effect on
Table 4. Hypothesis Test 3 consumption intention and behavior. This
Pearson Significant consumer awareness of fish consumption is
Variable
Correlation Value connected to the pattern of healthy food
Consumption consumption. The interest in consuming healthy
0.776 0.000*
Intention
foods and health involvement has a direct positive
effect on total fish consumption because
From the data analysis of Hypothesis 3 in respondents feel healthy if they eat fish [34]. It is
Table 4, it results that consumption intention has related to the price issue that consumption intention
the Pearson correlation value of 0.776 with the and behavior are caused by the consumers’ level of
significant value of 0.000 (p < 0.05). It means that understanding about health. Therefore, it indicates
consumption intention has a positive and that respondents in Bandung are aware of
significant effect on consumption behavior. consuming healthy food.

5. DISCUSSION Correspondingly, subjective norm


significantly affects consumption intention and
This study reveals that taste and odor behavior. It happens because a person will feel that
significantly affect consumption intention and he has a personal right to determine what he will
consumption behavior. Literatures have shown that do, includes what is determined by others around
taste and odor are the most important sensory him. In such circumstances, a person will know the
qualities in explaining consumers’ attitude toward views of others whether his behavior is appropriate
fish product [28, 29]. Similarly, the result of this or not, so that will cause the intention to perform a
study also indicates that taste and odor have the behavior [5]. For instance, parents who can pay
highest Pearson correlation value which means that attention to the dietary habit of their children, it can
taste and odor are the most influential factor in control and advise what foods should be consumed
consumption intention and behavior. It happens and what foods should be avoided [35]. Also,
because a person accustomed to the odor and taste friends have a role in providing recommendations
of fish will tend to have higher levels of fish for the food to eat. So, food selection is no longer
consumption [30]. However, the other dimension of based on nutritional content, but for socializing,
the fish attributes such as appearance and price, do enjoyment, and not to lose the status of a friend
not have a significant effect on consumption [35]. It indicates that respondents in Bandung are
intention and behavior. Research conducted in influenced by subjective norm to determine
Sweden shows that the appearance is less important whether they want to consume fish.
as an indicator of food quality and less relevant to
food purchase decisions [31]. It happens because Consumption behavior is also affected
consumers tend to see fish quality from other significantly by consumption intention. It happens
product attributes, such as taste and odor. In because one’s actions are the realization of one’s
addition, there is the type of consumer namely desire or intention to act [5]. Then, a particular
“economical mother” which assumes that the behavior displays the strength of intention to
appearance of food is not a priority but the nutrition perform that behavior [36]. Therefore, this study
contained is more important [32]. Similarly, ascertains the relationship between intention and
consumers do not consider the price as a factor in behavior in the context of fish consumption.
their consumption intention and behavior, because
a routine requirement for sufficient appetite and
nutritional intake contained are the reason for their
6. IMPLICATION 7. CONCLUSION & FUTURE RESEARCH

As a maritime country, Indonesia has a high The result of this research shows the
level of production in the fisheries sector. dimension of a fish attribute, that is the appearance
However, in Indonesia, the level of fish and price, do not have a significant effect on the
consumption is still low compared with Japan. fish consumption intention and behavior. However,
Japanese society has a very high level of fish other dimensions of taste and odor have a
consumption because they are fond of consuming significant influence on consumption intention and
fish, mainly marine fish. From this case, Minister consumption behavior, as well as consumer
of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, Susi Pudjiastuti awareness and subjective norms. The results of this
ambition to increase fish consumption with study come from data collection methods with an
GEMARIKAN program. In addition to inviting the online questionnaire spread around Bandung Raya.
people of Indonesia to like to consume fish, the In addition, there are supporting data from the
participation of all parties such as fishermen, fish Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries of the
suppliers, and traders is needed to succeed in the Republic of Indonesia regarding the behavior of
program. The reason is Indonesian society needs fish consumption in Indonesia. Low fish
more fish supply as an alternative to the consumption data in Indonesia compared to
consumption of animal protein at affordable prices. Singapore and Malaysia become the focus of this
Minister Susi urged that fish-eating campaign research. Both fish attribute dimensions (taste and
continue to be encouraged through bazaar or odor), consumer awareness and subjective norms,
competitive fish market, so that the people of have an important role in influencing a person to
Indonesia will be familiar with the fish consume fish. It is because a person's behavior in
consumption. eating fish is based on self-awareness formed by
self-evaluation. The self-evaluation can come from
In terms of helping to make the one's knowledge of the importance of eating fish
GEMARIKAN campaign successful, collaborative and recommendations from the nearest person.
marketing also needs to be well established, so that
the level of fish consumption in Indonesia increases In further research, particular research is
according to the desired target. In this digital era, needed to understand other factors that lead to
the proper collaborative marketing is to create an lower fish consumption through more specific data
all in one mobile application about fish culinary. In collection. As using the method of interviews and
this collaborative marketing, fish marketing is focus group discussion that makes researchers
formed with the help of various sectors such as know things that affect the consumption of fish in
application developer, restaurant owner, culinary more detail. Caused by the different tastes of each
influencer, and also the fish supplier. With this person, therefore providing more specific solutions
application, Indonesian society will be more tailored to the needs and desires of an individual. In
comfortable to get information on details of the addition, the movement of fish consumption needs
content contained from various types of fish and to be more disseminated to all levels of society.
the dishes, various benefits of fish, information
about the restaurant that serves fish dishes, and the REFERENCES
nearest markets or supermarkets which sell various
1. Simanjuntak, Y.G.T., Pemanfaatan Ampas
types of fish. Further, some influencers will also
Jus Kedelai dan Ikan Patin dalam
enliven this application in reviewing and discussing Pembuatan Nugget Serta Uji Daya Terima
fish restaurants and the benefits of consuming fish, dan Kandungan Gizinya. 2018.
thus it will encourage Indonesian people to love to 2. Soccol, M.C.H. and M. Oetterer, Seafood
consume fish. as functional food. Brazilian Archives of
Biology and Technology, 2003. 46(3): p.
With the creation of successful collaborative 443-454.
marketing, it will enable to increase fish 3. Susanto, E. and A. Fahmi, Senyawa
fungsional dari ikan: aplikasinya dalam
consumption in Indonesia. The existence of this
pangan. Jurnal Aplikasi Teknologi
media application will help the Indonesian people Pangan, 2012. 1(4).
easier to access information about fish and will 4. Zulaihah, S. and L. Widajanti, Hubungan
encourage them to get used to consuming fish. kecukupan asam eikosapentanoat (EPA),
asam dokosaheksanoat (DHA) ikan dan 18. Pratana, J.A.J., Analisis Pengaruh Sikap,
status gizi dengan prestasi belajar siswa. Subjective Norm dan Perceived
Jurnal Gizi Indonesia, 2006. 1(2). Behavioral Control Terhadap Purchase
5. Ajzen, I., The theory of planned behavior. Intention Pelanggan SOGO Department
Organizational behavior and human Store di Tunjungan Plaza Surabaya.
decision processes, 1991. 50(2): p. 179- Jurnal Strategi Pemasaran, 2014. 2(1).
211. 19. Jogianto, H., Salah Kaprah dan
6. Verbeke, W. and I. Vackier, Individual Pengalaman-pengalaman. 2007.
determinants of fish consumption: 20. Lo, C.T., The impact of entrepreneurship
application of the theory of planned education on entrepreneurial intention of
behaviour. Appetite, 2005. 44(1): p. 67- engineering students. 2011, City
82. University of Hong Kong.
7. Olsen, S.O., Comparative evaluation and 21. Ding, X., et al. Mining User Consumption
the relationship between quality, Intention from Social Media Using
satisfaction, and repurchase loyalty. Domain Adaptive Convolutional Neural
Journal of the academy of marketing Network. in AAAI. 2015.
science, 2002. 30(3): p. 240-249. 22. Suhartanto, D., et al., Loyalty Intention
8. Myrland, Ø., et al., Determinants of towards Islamic Bank: The Role of
seafood consumption in Norway: lifestyle, Religiosity, Image, and Trust.
revealed preferences, and barriers to International Journal of Economics and
consumption. Food quality and Preference, Management, 2018. 12(1): p. 119-132.
2000. 11(3): p. 169-188. 23. Albery, I.P. and M. Munafo, Psikologi
9. Sihite, E.L., Pengaruh Atribut Produk Kesehatan, Panduan Lengkap dan
Terhadap Sikap Konsumen Pada Green Komprehensif Bagi Studi Psikologi
Product Cosmetics (Studi Kasus Pada Kesehatan. Mitra Setia, 2011.
Puri Ayu Martha Tilaar Sun Plaza 24. Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen, Belief, attitude,
Medan). Pengaruh Atribut Produk intention and behavior: An introduction to
Terhadap Sikap Konsumen Pada Green theory and research. 1975.
Product Cosmetics (Studi Kasus Pada Puri 25. Dhaneswara, D.P., Faktor yang
Ayu Martha Tilaar Sun Plaza Medan). Mempengaruhi Niat Makan Sayur dan
2008. Buah pada Mahasiswa Asrama
10. Suhartanto, D., Perilaku Konsumen Universitas Airlangga. Jurnal PROMKES,
(Tinjauan Aplikasi di Indonesia). Penerbit: 2017. 4(1): p. 34-47.
Guardaya intimarta. Bandung, 2008. 26. Suhartanto, D., Metode Riset Pemasaran.
11. Fandy, T., Strategi Pemasaran Edisi 3. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2014.
CV. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2008. 27. Duwi, P., Mandiri Belajar SPSS
12. Cerda, A.A., et al., Consumer preferences (Statistical Product and Service Solution)
and willingness to pay for organic apples. Untuk Analisis Data & Uji Statistik.
Ciencia e Investigación Agraria, 2012. Jakarta: Penerbit MediaKom, 2009.
39(1): p. 47-59. 28. Aikman, S.N., S.L. Crites, and L.R.
13. Pratiwi, A., L. Hartayanie, and A. Tabita, Fabrigar, Beyond affect and cognition:
Sifat fungsional protein spirulina Identification of the informational bases of
platensis. Jurnal Teknologi Pangan. food attitudes. Journal of Applied Social
Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata. Psychology, 2006. 36(2): p. 340-382.
Semarang, 2012. 29. Olsen, S.O., Antecedents of seafood
14. Donati, F., G. Ruol, and M. Vasciaveo, consumption behavior: An overview.
Consumers’ attitude and behaviour Journal of Aquatic Food Product
towards fish products: a regional survey Technology, 2004. 13(3): p. 79-91.
of fish consumption in Italy. Responsible 30. Thorsdottir, F., et al., A model of fish
aquaculture in the new millenium. Aqua, consumption among young consumers.
2000: p. 185-186. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2012.
15. Kuwakhedawala, H., Consumer awarness 29(1): p. 4-12.
: importance of consumer awareness and 31. Bosona, T. and G. Gebresenbet, Swedish
rights of consumers. 2012. consumers’ perception of food quality and
16. Sutisna, P.K. and K. Pemasaran, Penerbit sustainability in relation to organic food
PT Remaja Rosdakarya. 2002, Bandung. production. Foods, 2018. 7(4): p. 54.
17. Rezai, G., et al., Consumers' awareness 32. Nevin, C., Consumers' Perceptions of
and consumption intention towards green Frozen and Chilled Seafood. Sea Fish
foods. African Journal of Business Industry Authortiy, Edinburgh, 2003.
Management, 2012. 6(12): p. 4496.
33. Siregar, A., M. Febri, and I.H. Hasman,
Analisis Faktor-faktor yang
Mempengaruhi Konsumsi Daging Ayam
(Studi Kasus: Pasar Sei Kambing,
Medan). Journal of Agriculture and
Agribusiness Socioeconomics, 2013. 2(2).
34. Pieniak, Z., et al., Impact of consumers'
health beliefs, health involvement and risk
perception on fish consumption: A study in
five European countries. British Food
Journal, 2008. 110(9): p. 898-915.
35. Khomsan, A., Pangan dan gizi untuk
kesehatan. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada,
Jakarta, 2003.
36. Kumar, B., A.K. Manrai, and L.A. Manrai,
Purchasing behaviour for environmentally
sustainable products: A conceptual
framework and empirical study. Journal of
Retailing and Consumer Services, 2017.
34: p. 1-9.

You might also like