You are on page 1of 5
APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY STATE OF CONNECTICUT ADANOTICE EX PARTE ORDER OF CUSTODY ‘SUPERIOR COURT Bl deed edodtglenpar tig gen] peewee winw jodlctgov need a ressonatle sccommadaton in accordance with pamenees Dg the ADA, carat corto oan ADA cai person isrccons: age Bed iste at rn jo €LgOVADA 1. Complete this form inctucing the aida on page 2 4. Bring the original and copy of his fom fo he cout aaa Om 2 Altlach an AtidavitConcoming Chicken form JO-F¥-164. clerk's ofc. 8 ifthora isnot yet a cour caso, oF posadgment ten fe modly After your application is processed the clerk wit gve you | EXPCUS custody, you mus fle wi this application (eg, the divorce, the proper papes o have served on the respondent toga sefroton ennunont usoay econ or poseicoment 6 Make sre the orignal ar etumea to cour aterseree. AMAIA ‘motor to moat custody must be fled wth hs epphcaton). Tosa barat Rone) Taian a (Tappa) | Dost ramar Hartford Hartford HHD FA 12-40651598 Na case PSR. Daten) ‘Tanya A. Taupier vs. Edward F. Taupior 1.1, (Name and address) Tanya A. Taupler, 155 Windermere Ave., Unit 2404, Ellington, CT 06029 ; ‘am the Applicant for this emergency ex parte order of custody, and !am the pA Mother [] Father] Legal Guardian of the following child or children for whom | am seeking this order (attach additional sheets if necessary): Child's Name (Fist, Mite Ina, Las) Date of birth (Month, day. year) Gabriel Taupior 11/04/2005 ‘Sara Taupier 03/23/2007 2. The Respondent (Name and address) Edward F. Taupier, 6 Douglas Drive, Cromwell, CT 06416 is the [-] Mother [x] Father["] Legal Guardian of the child or children named above. 3. Lam filing or there is already a pending matter in which | am a party for: [divorce (dissolution of marriage) i legal separation. CO annulment C1 custody of the child or children named abgve. J postjucament modification of custody 4, | believe there is an immediate and present risk of physical danger or psychological harm to the child or children named ‘above as further explained in the attached affidavit. | ask the Court to enter the following ex parte orders: Temporary custody to Va her? C Visitation as follows: BX No visitation. BX Respondent may not remove the child or children from the State of Connecticut JX Respondent may not interfere with Applicant's custody of the child or children. [Respondent may not interfere with the educational program of the child or children. FA Other or z Sa S577 te TT =] Ta “ Geraldine Fiearra qa orzar2014 TT nT oF, FFT ea ar 3 Scholes Lane, Essex, CT 06426 ( 860) 767 - 8300 Page tof 3) ee Cas POTATO Dasa TURE Tanya A. Taupier vs. Edward F. Taupier HHD FA 12-4065159S Affidavit 1, (Name) 1: am the Applicant in this matter and swear to the following (explain the events that have occurred, when they occurred, and why you believe that there is an immediate and present risk of physical danger or psychological harm to the child or children): 4. An emergency ex parte order is required because (attach additional sheets if necessary): 4. There is a Court order in pl 127.00) that the children attond the Ellington school system. That order was stained last summer, and the children attended the Ellington schools the entire academic year 2013-2014. That order remains any modification. _ children's Ellington school year commences on Wednesday August 27, 2014. On August 20, 2014, the Respondent _ smth mes mss it ob int Se school district. The Cromwell district begins a day earlier on Tuesday, August 26, 2014. Copy of email attached sta panier 3. The children have never attended Cromwell schools. When the Respondent and | lived together, the children went to Montessori schoo! in West Hartford. The Respondent refuses to contribute to any further education at Montessori, so the children were enrolled in public school. ‘4. checked with the Cromwell schoo! administration and verified that the Respondent did indeed register email so stating attached as Exhi children in spondent’s unilateral efforts t ing and psychologically harmful to_ the children, particularly Gabriel who has learning difficulties and has shown substantial progress in the Ellington system. 2. An emergency ex parte order is in the best interests ofthe child or children because there is an immediate and present risk of physical danger or psychological harm to the child or children named in this application, 3. (Check one) | [1] have [X] have not been a party or a witness or participated in any other capacity in cases in Connecticut or in any other state concerning custody or any child listed in this application. Ifyou have, identiy the name of any courts), the court case numberts) and the date(s) of any order(s): 4, (Check one) 1 I have or another person has taken the following actions to inform the respopgienbof thi (tit was another person, state who its}: rh Respondent was served by electronic mal th iF — [J No actions have been taken to inform the respondent of this application, but the court st sop consider this mea eons onan expat bas tre tolewng ears fy cforppurag hong Suda B71: Be ae hank of thelr schoo! year: caver bd‘disrupted wit The children were in the Ellington schoo! _ ‘School starts on August 27, 2014 and the children's peaceful abriel is particularly vulnerable since he has learning dueling system for academic year 2013/2014 pursuant to court order which has not expired or been modified. ais signad ‘Suse fa tra a aie eH re Ge OF Sperone oai2a2014 GEYUTDINE, ORE th 1873 (Page 2 of 3) Toarfy hal the statements above ar tue | 59D PRE TaRS OPO TG tothe best of my knowedge and bat f elif |For Touper CH Ure Dect nar Nama of Case (ani Deena HHD FA 12-4085159S Tanya A. Taupier vs. Edward F. Taupior Order e Court has reviewed this application and finds that an immediate and present risk of physical danger or psychological harm to the child or children exists, and in the best interests of the child or children the Court enters the following ex parte order: (Temporary custody to Ci Visitation as follows: (No visitation. (Respondent may not remove the child or children named in the application from the State of Connecticut, [Respondent may not interfere with Applicant's custody ofthe child or children named in the application. [Respondent may not interfere with the educational program of the child or children named in the application. Other eps mae odrde by the coianitiaaetnimna a ato serths (C1 This application for ex parte cree Bye Car aaa Order for Hearing and Summons Wp be completed by clerk) ‘The court orders that a hearing be held at the time and place shown below, which shall not be later than 14 days from the date of such order for hearing. The court further orders notice to be given by the Applicant to the Respondent of the Application, Affidavit, any ex parte order ifissued, and the time and place of the hearing, by having a true and attested copy served on the Respondent by any proper officer at least 5 days before the date of the hearing, Proof of service must be made to this Court. womngto yl Mav Hard ep onl pehatdat Fy Claas) Hovthoud Dod tes [420A To any proper officer: By the Authority of the State of Connecticut, you must serve a true and attested copy of the Application, Affidavit, Ex Parte Order if any, and Order for Hearing and Summons on the person named below in one of the ways required by law atleast 5 days before the date of the hearing, and file proof of service with this Court #o ta 10 a » Nouslig FaaaT De HS a Wye Cet ae IO222 Ne 10-19 (Page 3 of 3) rod

You might also like