Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Education
QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications (For Senior High School Teachers, please refer to: DO 3, s. 2016; DO 27, s. 2016; and DO 51, s. 2017)
Position Title Master Teacher I Master Teacher II Master Teacher III Master Teacher IV
Education For Elementary School - For Elementary School - Completion of academic Completion of academic
Bachelor of Elementary Bachelor of Elementary requirements for a Master’s requirements for a Master’s
Education (BEEd) or Education (BEEd) or degree in Education or its degree in Education or its
Bachelor’s degree plus 18 Bachelor’s degree plus 18 equivalent equivalent
professional units in professional units in Education;
Education; and 18 units for a and 24 units for a Master’s
Master’s degree in Education degree in Education or its
or its equivalent equivalent
For Secondary School - For Secondary School - Completion of academic Completion of academic
Bachelor of Secondary Bachelor of Secondary requirements for a Master’s requirements for a Master’s
Education (BSEd) or Education (BSEd) or degree in Education or its degree in Education or its
Bachelor’s degree plus 18 Bachelor’s degree plus 18 equivalent equivalent
professional units in Education professional units in Education;
with appropriate major; and 18 and 24 units for a Master’s
units for a Master’s degree in degree in Education or its
Education or its equivalent equivalent
Experience 3 years relevant experience 1 year as Master Teacher I or 1 year as Master Teacher II or 1 year as Master Teacher III or
4 years as Teacher III 5 years as Teacher III 5 years as Teacher III
Eligibility RA 1080 RA 1080 RA 1080 RA 1080
Trainings None required 4 hours relevant training 8 hours of relevant training 16 hours of relevant training
B. Preferred Qualifications
Education Master’s Degree Graduate
Experience 3 years in service as Teacher III
Eligibility Licensure Examination for Teachers
Trainings Relevant trainings
12. Applied skills in the effective 1. Sample agreement for learners at risk signed
communication of learner needs, by parents and corresponding evidence of
progress and achievement to key improvement
stakeholders, including 2. Record of dialogue and/or parent-teacher
parents/guardians. conferences and corresponding evidence of
improvement
3. Anecdotal record communicated to and signed
by the learners and/or parents with
corresponding evidence of improvement
4. Sample of learners' test results signed by
parents and corresponding evidence of
improvement
5. Sample of accomplished rubrics given for
performance task and corresponding evidence
of improvement
6. Attendance sheet/minutes of parent-teacher
conference
7. Signed report cards of students at risk with
corresponding evidence of improvement
8. Correspondence notebook/letters/proof of
communication using other modalities (e.g. e-
mail, SMS, etc.) and corresponding evidence of
improvement
9. Learners’ performance record
10. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)
Plus Factor 13. Performed various related 1. Served as reliever of classes in the absence of
works/activities that contribute to the teachers
teaching-learning process. 2. Served as OIC in the absence of the principal
10
Performance Indicators
Very
Objectives Means of Verification (MOV) Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Satisfactory
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
1. Modeled effective 1. Classroom observation tool Quality Modeled Modeled Modeled Modeled No
applications of content (COT) rating sheet and/or inter- effective effective effective effective acceptable
knowledge within and observer agreement form about applications of applications of applications applications of evidence
across curriculum effective applications of content content content of content content was shown
teaching areas. knowledge within and across knowledge knowledge knowledge knowledge
curriculum teaching areas within and within and within and within and
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used across across across across
in demonstration teaching curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum
highlighting integration of content teaching areas teaching teaching teaching areas
knowledge within and across as shown in areas as areas as as shown in
subject areas MOV 1 with a shown in shown in MOV 1 with a
3. Instructional materials developed rating of 8 MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a rating of 5
highlighting effective application rating of 7 rating of 6
of content knowledge within and Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
across subject areas least 4 lessons lessons as lessons as lesson as acceptable
4. Performance tasks/test as evidenced evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidence
material(s) used in demonstration by MOV 1 and MOV 1 from MOV 1 from MOV 1 from was shown
teaching highlighting integration supported by colleagues colleagues colleagues and
of content knowledge within and any 1 of the and supported and supported by
across subject areas other MOV by any 1 of supported by any 1 of the
5. Results of assessment used in given the other any 1 of the other MOV
demonstration teaching MOV given other MOV given
highlighting mastery of lessons given
learned
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations) Timeliness
11
Performance Indicators
Very
Objectives Means of Verification (MOV) Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Satisfactory
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
2. Collaborated with 1. Copy of the research proposal Quality Conducted, Conducted Conducted Proposed No
colleagues in the focused on enriching knowledge completed and and action action research acceptable
conduct and of content and pedagogy disseminated completed research with with colleagues evidence
application of research 2. Proof of participation and/or action action colleagues was shown
to enrich knowledge of contribution to a collaborative research with research with
content and research (e.g. e-mail, actual colleagues colleagues
pedagogy. output submitted, terms of
reference, etc.)
3. Certified completed collaborative
research focused on enriching
knowledge of content and
pedagogy
4. Proof of dissemination of Efficiency Submitted at Submitted any Submitted Submitted any No
research findings with colleagues least 4 of the 3 of the any 2 MOV 1 MOV acceptable
5. Proof of utilization of research given MOV acceptable evidence
findings MOV was shown
6. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
12
Performance Indicators
Very
Objectives Means of Verification (MOV) Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Satisfactory
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
3. Developed and 1. Classroom observation tool Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated No
applied effective (COT) rating sheet and/or inter- effective effective effective effective acceptable
teaching strategies to observer agreement form about teaching teaching teaching teaching evidence
promote critical and using effective teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to was shown
creative thinking, as strategies to promote critical and promote promote promote promote critical
well as other higher- creative teaching, as well as critical and critical and critical and and creative
order thinking skills. other higher-order thinking skills creative creative creative thinking, as
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used thinking, as thinking, as thinking, as well as other
in demonstration teaching well as other well as other well as other higher-order
highlighting different teaching higher-order higher-order higher-order thinking skills
strategies that develop critical thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills as shown in
and creative thinking and/or other as shown in as shown in as shown in MOV 1 with a
HOTS MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a rating of 5
3. Instructional materials rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6
highlighting different teaching Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
strategies that develop critical more lessons lessons as lessons as lesson as acceptable
and creative thinking and/or other as evidently evidently evidently evidently evidence
HOTS shown in MOV shown in shown in shown in MOV was shown
4. Performance tasks/test 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and 1 and
material(s) used in demonstration supported by supported by supported by supported by
teaching any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the any of the other
5. Results of assessment used in other MOV other MOV other MOV MOV given
the demonstration teaching given given given
6. Others (Please specify and Timeliness
provide annotations)
13
Performance Indicators
Very
Objectives Means of Verification (MOV) Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Satisfactory
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
4. Worked with 1. Classroom observation tool Quality Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and No
colleagues to model (COT) rating sheet and/or inter- shared shared shared shared acceptable
and share effective observer agreement form about effective effective effective effective evidence
techniques in the sharing effective techniques in classroom classroom classroom classroom was shown
management of the management of classroom management management management management
classroom structure to structure strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
engage learners, 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used engage engage engage engage
individually or in in demonstration teaching learners in learners in learners in learners in
groups, in meaningful highlighting effective classroom activities/ tasks activities/ activities/ activities/ tasks
exploration, discovery management strategies that done in tasks done in tasks done in done in
and hands-on engage learners in activities/tasks different different different different
activities within a in different physical learning physical physical physical physical
range of physical environments learning learning learning learning
learning environments. 3. Minutes of LAC highlighting the environments environments environments environments
sharing on effective classroom as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
management techniques MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
4. Instructional materials used in rating of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
demonstration teaching Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any No
5. Others (Please specify and least 4 lessons lessons lessons 1 of the acceptable
provide annotations) supported by supported by supported by acceptable evidence
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV was shown
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
other other other
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
14
Performance Indicators
Very
Objectives Means of Verification (MOV) Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Satisfactory
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
5. Exhibited effective Classroom observation tool (COT) Quality Exhibited Exhibited Exhibited Exhibited No
and constructive rating sheet and/or inter-observer effective and effective and effective and effective and acceptable
behavior management agreement form about effective constructive constructive constructive constructive evidence
skills by applying teacher management of learner behavior behavior behavior behavior shown
positive and non- behavior using the following management management management management
violent discipline to strategies: skills by skills by skills by skills by
ensure learning- 1. Providing motivation applying applying applying applying
focused environments. 2. Praising the learners/Giving positive and positive and positive and positive and
positive feedback non-violent non-violent non-violent non-violent
3. Setting house rules/guidelines discipline to discipline to discipline to discipline to
4. Ensuring learners’ active ensure ensure ensure ensure
participation learning- learning- learning- learning-
5. Allowing learners to express their focused focused focused focused
ideas/opinions environments environments environments environments
6. Giving equal opportunities to shown in MOV shown in shown in shown in MOV
learners 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a 1 with a rating
7. Encouraging learners to ask of 8 rating of 7 rating of 6 of 5
questions Efficiency Applied at Applied at Applied at Applied any of No
8. Others (Please specify and least 7 of the least 7 of the least 7 of the the given acceptable
provide annotations) given given given strategies as evidence
strategies as strategies as strategies as observed in shown
observed in at observed in 3 observed in 2 only 1 lesson
least 4 lessons lessons lessons
Timeliness
15
Performance Indicators
Very
Objectives Means of Verification (MOV) Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Satisfactory
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
6. Worked with 1. Minutes of LAC session/s, Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with Worked with No
colleagues to share highlighting one’s sharing of colleagues at colleagues in colleagues in colleagues but acceptable
differentiated, strategies on differentiated and least in the the school the no evidence of evidence
developmentally developmentally-appropriate district/cluster level to share department or sharing with shown
appropriate opportunities to address learners’ level to share lesson grade level to others
opportunities to differences lesson share lesson
address learners’ 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
differences in gender, highlighting strategies on
needs, strengths, differentiated and
interests and developmentally-appropriate
experiences. opportunities to address learners’ Efficiency Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at Submitted at No
differences least 1 lesson least 1 lesson least 1 lesson least 1 lesson, acceptable
3. Corresponding instructional as evidently as evidently as evidently as evidenced evidence
materials showing differentiated shown in MOV shown in shown in by either MOV shown
and developmentally appropriate 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and 2 or 3 but no
opportunities to address learners’ supported by supported by supported by evidence of
differences any any any sharing with
4. Others (e.g. testimonial, write-up acceptable acceptable acceptable others
from colleagues of the MOV MOV MOV
lessons/insights gained from the
Master Teacher's sharing)
Timeliness
16
Performance Indicators
Very
Objectives Means of Verification (MOV) Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Satisfactory
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
7. Developed and 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) Quality Developed and Developed Developed Developed and No
applied effective rating sheet and/or inter-observer applied and applied and applied applied acceptable
strategies in the agreement form about using effective effective effective effective evidence
planning and effective strategies in strategies strategies strategies strategies was shown
management of implementing developmentally showing showing showing showing
developmentally sequenced teaching and learning developmentall developmenta developmenta developmentall
sequenced teaching process y- sequenced lly- sequenced lly- y- sequenced
and learning 2. Results of learners’ assessment teaching and teaching and sequenced teaching and
processes to meet during the actual teaching learning learning teaching and learning
curriculum 3. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used process as process as learning process as
requirements and in demonstration teaching shown in MOV shown in process as shown in MOV
varied teaching highlighting developmentally 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a shown in 1 with a rating
contexts. sequenced teaching-learning of 8 rating of 7 MOV 1 with a of 5
process rating of 6
4. Instructional materials showing Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 Submitted 1 No
effective strategies in least 4 lessons lessons as lesson as lesson as acceptable
developmentally sequenced as evidenced evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by evidence
teaching and learning process by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and 2 shown in any 1 of the was shown
5. Performance tasks/test 2 and and supported MOV 1 and/or acceptable
material(s) used in demonstration supported by by any 1 of 2 and MOV
teaching any 1 of the the other supported by
6. Others (Please specify and other acceptable any 1 of the
provide annotations) acceptable MOV other
MOV acceptable
MOV
Timeliness
17
Performance Indicators
Very
Objectives Means of Verification (MOV) Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Satisfactory
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
8. Reviewed with 1. Implemented LAC/FGD Plan Quality Consistently Frequently led Occasionally Rarely led No
colleagues, teacher 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on led collaborative led collaborative acceptable
and learner feedback use of teacher and learner collaborative reviews of collaborative reviews of evidence
to plan, facilitate and feedback to enrich teaching reviews of teacher and reviews of teacher and was shown
enrich teaching practice with proof of attendance teacher and learner teacher and learner
practice. 3. Others (Please specify and learner feedback as learner feedback as
provide annotations) feedback as evidenced by feedback as evidenced by
evidenced by the MOV evidenced by the MOV
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
collaborative collaborative collaborative collaborative acceptable
reviews of reviews of reviews of review of evidence
teacher and teacher and teacher and teacher and was shown
learner learner learner learner
feedback as feedback as feedback as feedback as
evidently evidently evidently evidently
shown in MOV shown in shown in shown in any of
1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and the acceptable
supported by supported by supported by MOV
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
18
Performance Indicators
Very
Objectives Means of Verification (MOV) Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Satisfactory
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
9. Advised and guided 1. Teaching and learning resources Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely advised No
colleagues in the developed by colleagues and advised advised advised colleagues in acceptable
selection, critiqued on their alignment to colleagues in colleagues in colleagues in the selection, evidence
organization, learning goals the selection, the selection, the selection, organization, was shown
development and use 2. Lesson plans by colleagues organization, organization, organization, development
of appropriate critiqued in terms of the alignment development development development and appropriate
teaching and learning of the teaching and learning and and and use of teaching
resources, including resources to the indicated appropriate appropriate appropriate and learning
ICT, to address learning goals and use of use of use of resources as
specific learning goals. appropriateness to the target teaching and teaching and teaching and shown in the
learners learning learning learning MOV submitted
3. Others (Please specify and resources as resources as resources as
provide annotations) shown in the shown in the shown in the
MOV MOV MOV
submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
least 4 teaching and teaching and teaching and acceptable
teaching and learning learning learning evidence
learning resources as resources as resource as was shown
resources as evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by
evidenced by at least 1 of at least 1 of any of the
at least 1 of the the acceptable
the acceptable acceptable acceptable MOV
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
19
Performance Indicators
Very
Objectives Means of Verification (MOV) Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Satisfactory
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
10. Worked 1. Any proof of collaborative review Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
collaboratively with if the test is designed based on reviewed reviewed reviewed reviewed acceptable
colleagues to review its purpose (e.g. diagnostic, collaboratively collaboratively collaborativel collaboratively evidence
the design, selection, formative and summative) assessment assessment y assessment assessment was shown
organization and use 2. Any proof of collaborative review tools with tools with tools with tools with
of a range of effective of the alignment of the test with colleagues as colleagues as colleagues as colleagues as
diagnostic, formative the curriculum shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
and summative 2.1.formative test attached to a MOV MOV MOV MOV submitted
assessment strategies lesson plan submitted submitted submitted
consistent with 2.2.summative assessment with
curriculum TOS
requirements. 2.3.diagnostic test with its TOS
3. Others (Please specify and Efficiency Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
provide annotations) least 4 assessment assessment assessment acceptable
assessment tools as tools as tool as evidence
tools as evidently evidently evidently was shown
evidently shown in any shown in any shown in any of
shown in any of the of the the acceptable
of the acceptable acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
20
Performance Indicators
Very
Objectives Means of Verification (MOV) Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Satisfactory
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
11. Interpreted 1. Collaborative interpretation of the Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
collaboratively index of mastery obtained from 1 collaborated collaborated collaborated collaborated acceptable
monitoring and class with with with with colleagues evidence
evaluation strategies 2. Collaborative interpretation of colleagues in colleagues in colleagues in in the was shown
of attainment data to item analysis of quarterly the the the interpretation of
support learner examinations interpretation interpretation interpretation assessment
progress and 3. Collaborative interpretation of of assessment of assessment of data as shown
achievement. results of performance data as shown data as shown assessment in the MOV
assessment in the MOV in the MOV data as submitted
4. Others (Please specify and submitted submitted shown in the
provide annotations) MOV
submitted
Timeliness
21
Performance Indicators
Very
Objectives Means of Verification (MOV) Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Satisfactory
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
12. Applied skills in 1. Sample agreement for learners at Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely applied No
the effective risk signed by parents and applied skills in applied skills applied skills skills in the acceptable
communication of corresponding evidence of the effective in the effective in the effective evidence
learner needs, improvement communication communicatio effective communication was shown
progress and 2. Record of dialogue and/or parent- of learner n of learner communicatio of learner
achievement to key teacher conferences and needs and needs and n of learner needs and
stakeholders, corresponding evidence of progress to progress to needs and progress to
including improvement parents/ parents/ progress to parents/
parents/guardians. 3. Anecdotal record communicated guardians as guardians as parents/ guardians as
to and signed by the learners shown in the shown in the guardians as shown in the
and/or parents with corresponding MOV MOV shown in the MOV submitted
evidence of improvement submitted submitted MOV
4. Sample of learners’ test results submitted
signed by parents and
corresponding evidence of
improvement
5. Sample of accomplished rubrics
given for performance task and
corresponding evidence of
improvement
6. Attendance sheet/minutes of
parent-teacher conference
7. Signed report cards of students at
risk with corresponding evidence
of improvement
22
Performance Indicators
Very
Objectives Means of Verification (MOV) Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Satisfactory
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
8. Correspondence Efficiency Submitted at Submitted any Submitted Submitted any No
notebook/letters/proof of least 4 of the 3 MOV any 2 MOV 1 MOV acceptable
communication using other acceptable evidence
modalities (e.g. e-mail, SMS, MOV was shown
etc.) and corresponding evidence
of improvement
9. Learners’ performance record
Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Timeliness
23
Performance Indicators
Very
Objectives Means of Verification (MOV) Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Satisfactory
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
13. Performed various 1. Served as reliever of classes in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely No
related works/activities the absence of teachers performed performed performed performed acceptable
that contribute to the 2. Served as OIC in the absence of special tasks special tasks special tasks special tasks evidence
teaching-learning the principal and/or and/or and/or and/or was shown
process. 3. Represented the principal in assignments assignments assignments assignments as
meetings and conferences as shown in as shown in as shown in shown in the
4. Observed classes of Teachers I- the MOV the MOV the MOV MOV submitted
III submitted submitted submitted
5. Assisted the school selection
committee in the evaluation of
credentials when hiring or
promoting teachers
6. Certificate of Recognition or
Participation
7. Certificate of Training
8. Certificate of Speakership
9. Committee involvement
24
Performance Indicators
Very
Objectives Means of Verification (MOV) Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
QET Satisfactory
(5) (3) (2) (1)
(4)
10. Advisorship of Co-curricular Efficiency Submitted at Submitted Submitted Submitted any No
activities least 4 only 3 only 2 1 of the acceptable
11. Book or Journal Authorship/Co- different kinds different kinds different kinds acceptable evidence
authorship/Contributorship of acceptable of acceptable of acceptable MOV was shown
12. Coordinatorship/chairmanship MOV MOV MOV
13. Coaching and mentoring learners
in competitions
14. Mentoring pre-service/in-service
teachers
15. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Timeliness
25
This Tool was developed through the Philippine National Research Center for Teacher Quality (RCTQ) with support from the Australian
Government through the Basic Education Sector Transformation (BEST) Program.
26