by registered mail on may 3 and received by the Rule 13 NLRC the following day. Thus it was filed out of time.
Facts: The board insists that the appeal was made on
time because it was delivered for mailing on Private Respondent Peter Colasan was the may 1 to Garcia Communications Company a General Manager of Benguet Electric licensed private letter carrier. Cooperative (Beneco). Private letter carrier instead of the Philippine Colasan Received memorandums from COA post office is not a regocnized mode of filing regarding substantial inconsistencies regarding pleadings. In case of private carrier the date of per diem allowances received by officials and actual receipt of court and not date of delivery members of the board with the directives of to the private carrier is deemed date of the NEA ( National Electrification Administration). pleading. The audit report enumerated irregularities in the utilization of funds amounting to 37 million released by NEA to Beneco.
Having ben aware of the serious financial
condition on Beneco andx what appeared to be mismanagement, Colasa initiated implementation of remedial measures recommended by COA. The board responded by abolishing his allowance and subsequently ousted Colasan as GM.
Colasan filed w the NLRC a complaint. The Labor
arbiter granted complaint and ordered Colasa tro be reinstated and joint liability of the board and Beneco in the payment of backwages.
The board appealed to the NLRC. The NLRC
declared that only Beneco is liable. Beneco filed a petition on certiorari.
Issue:
WON the appeal was filed out of time.
Ruling:
Yes.
The board members received decision of the LA
on 21 april 1988. And because may 1 is a holiday they had until may 2 to perfect their