Drainage Rainfall Calcs - GOOD Drawings in Revit - MansWilliams Consulting PDF

Mann Williams Consulting Civil and Structural Engineers
7 Old King Street, Queen Square, Bath BA1 2JW T 01225 464419
Project 6505. 10 West, University of Bath
10 West, University of Bath
Planning Conditions 6 & 7
The following pages in conjunction with Intégrale responses to condition 3 have been compiled to address
planning conditions 6 & 7 of the Application.
Surface Water Strategy
The building site is relatively flat and slopes down to the south west corner.
The existing surfacing is a mixture of permeable paving, soft landscaping and impermeable roadways.
The existing landscaping provides sustainable drainage solutions through run off from the hard landscaping
onto the soft or permeable paving for natural infiltration into the ground.
With the new building, the intention is to utilise SUDS and the known infiltration rates of the ground strata
encountered on the campus. From previous developments and soakaway testing in accordance with BRE
Digest 365, the infiltration rate is known to be 0.00012m/s.
Ground investigations completed at the proposed site have identified that where previous developments have
occurred (an earlier car park) the original tarmac surface was left in place and built over. The proposed
building will mean that all made ground is removed, and any potential contamination with it, to leave a natural
site.
The proposed location for the SUDS system is within an undeveloped area of parkland to the east of the main
site, see figure 1. This area has only been developed from farmland to sports pitches, and assuming no
anomalies, will not be likely to contain any contamination through which the SUDS would infiltrate. This
theory is based on the Intégrale GI report and recent letter dated 14 September (appended letter at the end of
this document).
Figure 1
Photo 1 – Circa 1971 Site is undeveloped Photo 2 – Circa 1976. Site developed with Photo 3 – Circa 2011. Site has been
and used as sports pitches circular car park. Car park is cut into the redeveloped with increased car park.
previous sports pitches South end of car park has been built up
in fill to
The design of the SUDS system will be a hybrid swale/soakaway. This is to ensure that there is sufficient
capacity to store the water run off prior to infiltration but also provide enhancement for the ecology of the site
and its enjoyment by its users.
The design has been completed in TEDDS using stormwater crates under the swale ditch to provide the fully
sized soakaway. BRE Digest 365 has been used.
The completed design and details are shown on Mann Williams’ 500 series drawings.
1
Mann Williams Consulting Civil and Structural Engineers
Project 6505. 10 West, University of Bath
Surface Water Design
Impermeable area 2314m²
Infiltration rate
(based on various tests around campus) 0.00012m/s
A 30% increase in rainfall inflow has been allowed for at the peak volume requirement.
From TEDDS soakaway design using crates, the provision of a 25m x 3.3m x 0.75m deep soakaway is
sufficient for the required emptying time based on the infiltration rates.
The calculations show a shortfall in the storage volume of 83.5m³. This will be provided through the swale
ditch located directly above the soakaway crates.
Over the 25m length of the crates the required cross sectional area is 3.35m².
For a “semicircular” formed ditch as indicated on the drawing 6505-512 ground level will provide an area of
3.38m² which is adequate over the 25m length to provide the additional storage volume as well as some
capacity in the granular backfill layer.
∴ Design has adequate capacity.
2
3
lntégrale The Granary
Chewton Fields
Ston Easton
Somerset BA3 4BX
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0) 1761 241041
Fax: +44 (0) 1761 241042
Environment Agency
Rivers House
East Quay
Bridgwater
Somerset TA6 4YS
FAO Anita Cottrell & Andy Reading
Ref: KNB/1233
11th September 2014
Dear Ms Cottrell and Mr Reading
Re: Proposed Academic Building, West Car Park, University of Bath Campus
Your Ref. WX/2014/125641/01-L01
BANES Planning Ref. 14/00953
We have been forwarded your letter of 11th April 2014 to Bath & Northeast Somerset Council, in which
planning conditions covering contamination aspects were recommended for this redevelopment. These
‘model conditions’ include pre-commencement requirements for conceptual modelling, ground investigation,
risk assessment, remediation and verification strategy. We have been asked by the project team to confirm
the pertinent details contained within our 2013 investigation report, which cover these aspects.
I confirm having spoken with Andy Reading and Anita Cottrell today, and note the ‘Condition Guidance’
given by the Agency. This indicates 3 particular aspects of concern to the Agency, which led to the imposing
of these conditions, as discussed below:
1. Application Area
The Phase 1 & 2 reports prepared by Integrale in October 2013 show a ‘Site Boundary’ in Figure 1,
which we understood to be the new building footprint proposed at that time. The Figure also shows a
‘Study Area’, which we drew arbitrarily to enclose the area where specific investigation had been
requested by the project team and where access was possible. However as the scheme design
progressed, the subsequent application gives a ‘red line boundary’ extending further to the north and
west. The Agency have asked that consideration (of contamination aspects) be given to the whole
application area.
The attached drawing gives the ‘red line boundary’ of the planning permission area, the proposed
building footprint (in grey), and the 2013 trial pit locations. It also shows the extent of the existing car
park in the west, which is to be retained alongside the new building. A planted landscaping area in the
northwest has been annotated. Due to ongoing use, limitations on acceptable surface damage, tree root
protection zones and buried services, there were restrictions on the available areas for investigation.
The positions were therefore mutually agreed by the consulting engineers, Integrale and the University
Estates Department where access, trees and services allowed and where design information was needed.
The desk study of historical maps and Google Earth satellite imagery given in the Phase 1 report
confirms that the complete development area was open ground until the early 1950’s when it became
Geological • Geotechnical • Environmental • Engineering

Intégrale Consulting is a trading name of Integrale Limited
Registered Office: West End House, Blackfriars Road, Nailsea, Bristol, BS48 4DJ, United Kingdom
Company Registration No. 2855366 England VAT Reg. No. 609 7402 37
part of sports pitches. A circular car park had been developed by the mid 1980’s, and by 2002/2005 the
existing larger car park and surrounding landscaping was constructed. The desk study does not suggest
that in the western and northern zones there has been any more contaminative land usage, and
therefore the potential for remnant contamination due to past use is identified as low.
2. Investigation and Sampling Rationale
The Agency has also requested clarification on the rationale for sampling strategy and trial pit location.
Again, access and buried service restrictions controlled these locations, and the positions excavated
were chosen to provide as broad a range as possible, given that the desk study did not suggest any
specific target areas based on past use.
The trial pits proved Made Ground due to buried service trenches at TP 3 and 4, and make up above the
former car park asphalt surface at TP 6. At TP 2 and 5 a natural succession of topsoil over subsoil and
weathered bedrock was found. In TP 1, there appeared to be a thick mantle of reworked natural soils
and bedrock gravel beneath the topsoil, presumed due to relandscaping.
The sampling details provided on the trial pit records show typically one sample per stratum recovered
across the range of topsoil, Made Ground and natural soils. The analytical strategy covered a suite of
generic and hydrocarbon testing of Made Ground, plus a typical existing topsoil sample and a Total
Petroleum Hydrocarbon test on Made Ground from the existing parking area, as follows:
Trial Pit 1 Made Ground 0.5m depth Generic suite, speciated PAH, unspeciated TPH
Trial Pit 4 Made Ground 1.2m depth Unspeciated TPH
Trial Pit 5 Topsoil 0.15m depth Generic suite, speciated PAH, unspeciated TPH
Trial Pit 6 Made Ground 0.7m depth Generic suite, speciated PAH, unspeciated TPH
We therefore consider that the investigation locations were completed at optimal locations given the
relatively ‘non-contaminative’ past usage and the existing site restrictions, to provide representative data
across a reasonable and typical area. The pitting confirmed that the original in situ strata may still exist
in the southern area, while the central and northern zones have been remodelled with site won material
due to construction of sports pitches, two phases of car parking and landscaping, together with
installation of buried service trenches. These usages date from the 1950’s to 1980’s.
3. Risk to Controlled Waters
The Agency note that no groundwater or leachability samples were taken and requested confirmation
that the risk posed by remnant contamination to controlled waters is understood.
Sections 2.2 and 2.5.2 of the report describe the known geological succession, including a deep borehole
sunk very close to, or possibly within the site boundary. This proved Great Oolite limestone bedrock
to approximately 17m depth, apparently without groundwater being proven. Extensive previous
investigations at the University have confirmed the groundwater table stands below at least 10m depth,
as would be expected at this elevated location, with free-draining, fractured limestone present.
The conceptual exposure model given in Section 2.8 identifies the Great Oolite Principal Aquifer as the
most likely controlled waters receptor. The most likely source-pathway-receptor linkage, if a
contaminant source were to be present, was identified as leaching from soils or migration of liquid
contaminants through the unsaturated zone or by means of man-made pathways, to reach the principal
aquifer.
The risk assessment was continued by excavating trial pits to confirm the typical range of ground
conditions, and completing analyses of soil to characterise the likely contaminant components.

The analyses proved raised petroleum and polyaromatic hydrocarbons present in the Made Ground
sample from TP 6. However this sample included asphalt remnants from the former car park surface
which would cause the raised hydrocarbon results. These are highly unlikely to be leachable or mobile,
given their origin and nature within the bound tarmacadam.
Marginally raised arsenic and chromium from existing Topsoil within the landscaping area are similarly
highly unlikely to be in leachable form. Indeed, they are within the range of naturally occurring metals
for this district and typical of the topsoils within the campus.
The remainder of the soils analyses show contaminants very low or absent, indicating that significantly
leachable materials are unlikely to be present.
Proposed Redevelopment
The attached cross-sections show the proposed building is to be constructed close to existing grade at
the southern end, where a natural soils profile has been proven. Due to the gradual slope, the northern
end of the building will require excavation to 2.5-4m depth below existing level, ie through the complete
depth of Made Ground and into the bedrock. Within the area of new building construction therefore,
the source zone for any remnant contaminants within Made Ground beneath the northern and central
areas will be completely removed. As the southern end is approached, the building will be close to
existing grade, with approximately 600mm of build-up required at the southeast corner.
The southwestern area of the ‘red line boundary’ site is to remain as existing car parking alongside the
new building. Similarly in the northwestern zone and to the east, the existing soft landscaping and trees
are to remain.
Recommended Remedial Measures

In addition to the required excavation of Made Ground to achieve new floor slab formation levels, the
Phase 2 report recommends removal of any proven buried asphalt and drainage runs associated with
areas of the former car park where these occur beneath the new building area. Sufficient Made Ground
is to be removed in new soft landscaped areas to allow placement of at least 300mm of certified topsoil.
Conclusions
The Phase 1 and 2 reports prepared by Integrale in October 2013 identified preliminary risk assessment
by desk study and conceptual modelling, as required by the planning conditions. The site investigation
completed in 2013 confirmed the desk study findings and the absence of significant potential
contaminative ground. The Made Ground proven relates to former reworked natural soils beneath
sports pitches, and subsequent car park construction, together with buried service trenches. The
analyses have proven minimal remnant contamination, with the exception of hydrocarbons within buried
asphalt surfacing.
Based on these findings, the recommended remediation, and the removal of soils during deep
excavations across the northern and central new building footprint, the risk of significant remnant Made
Ground which could potentially impact on groundwater quality at depth within the limestone aquifer
once the new building is constructed is considered negligible. As such, there would be no need for any
longer term monitoring or maintenance.
A verification report confirming the extent and depth of excavations, recording and certifying the
formations can be provided if required.
We therefore consider that the pre-commencement conditions for risk identification and site
characterisation are fulfilled. A verification report providing details of the excavated formations, any
anomalies proven, details of waste disposal or soils reuse and any associated validation sampling, can be
provided prior to completion of the construction and occupation.

This letter is copied to the planning authority for compliance with the conditions.
Yours sincerely
Dr Kay Boreland
Technical Director
Copy to: Sarah James, BANES Planning Services

Spencer Fereday, Mann Williams
Charles Jordan, AWW Architects
Encl. Proposed Site Plan showing Investigation Strategy & Locations

Ground Reduction Illustration & Sections

Notes
This drawing may be scaled for the purposes of Planning Applications, Land
Registry and for Legal plans where the scale bar is used, and where it verifies
that the drawing is an original or an accurate copy. It may not be scaled for
construction purposes.
Always refer to figured dimensions. All dimensions are to be checked on site.
Discrepancies and/or ambiguities between this drawing and information given
elsewhere must be reported immediately to this office for clarification before
proceeding. All drawings are to be read in conjunction with the specification and
all works to be carried out in accordance with latest British Standards / Codes of
Practice.
'Red Line' Trial Pit

application
boundary
Northern
building
area to be
in 3-3.5m
excavation
cutting TP 6
New
Extent of existing building
landscaping mound - TP 3 footprint
inaccessible for shaded grey
investigation
TP 1
TP 4
TP 5
Existing
car park TP 2
to be
retained
Rev Date Init Notes Chkd
Compound
Southern
North
Eastern extent of building
Client
existing car park - area

area inaccessible at/close to
for investigation grade Drawing Originator
inspired
environments
London - 7 Birchin Lane, London, EC3V 3BW 020 7160 6000
Bristol - Rivergate House, Bristol, BS1 6LS 0117 923 2535
Plymouth - East Quay House, Plymouth, PL4 0HN 01752 261 282
RIBA Chartered Practice www.aww-uk.com
Project Title
10 West
University of Bath
Drawing Title
Proposed Site Plan
Scale Sheet Drawn Checked Date
1 : 500 A1 CEJ IJ 17/02/14

Status Project No.
PLANNING 3208
Drawing Reference Drawing No. Revision
10WEST-AWW-A-DWG 0110
NOTES
1. This drawing is copyright and may not be reproduced

without the permission of Mann Williams.
2. All drawings are to be read in conjunction with the

project specification with all works carried out in
accordance with the latest British Standards and codes
of practice.
3. Any ambiguities or discrepancies between this drawing

and any other information given elsewhere must be
reported to Mann Williams for clarification before work
proceeds.
4. All dimensions to be checked on site and any

discrepancies reported to the engineer before work
commences.
5. Only figured or calculated dimensions should be used

and no drawing , in any format should be scaled.
. .
01
SK-137
01
SK-137
02
SK-137
02
SK-137
EXISTING
GROUND LEVEL DEPTH OF MAIN
REDUCED DIG
DEPTH OF MAIN 5 4 3 2 1
3521
1874
REDUCED DIG SCALE BAR 1:200
0 10m
REV DESCRIPTION BY DATE

P1 PRELIMINARY ISSUE RJC 10.09.14
SECTION 01
1:200 SK-137
P-PRELIMINARY T-TENDER CONSTRUCTION
EXISTING PROJECT
UNIVERSITY OF BATH
GROUND LEVEL
10 WEST
DEPTH OF MAIN
REDUCED DIG TITLE
HEIGHT OF 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
GROUND REDUCTION
2076
BUILD UP ILLUSTRATION
600
MANN WILLIAMS
CONSULTING CIVIL AND
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
7 OLD KING STREET
QUEEN SQUARE
BATH BA1 2JW
T 01225 464419
F 01225 448651
E bath@mannwilliams.co.uk
DRAWN CHKD SIZE SCALE DATE
RJC SCF A1 1:200 SEPT 2014

STATUS
SECTION
1:200
02
SK-137 PRELIMINARY
PROJECT DRAWING REV
6505 SK-137 P1
NOTES

without permission of Mann Williams
2. All drawings are to be read in conjunction with the

accordance with the latest British Standards and
codes of practice
3. Any ambiguities or discrepancies between this

drawing and any other information given elsewhere
must be reported to Mann Williams for clarification
before work proceeds

discrepancies reported to the engineer before any
work commences
5. Only figured or calculated dimensions should be used
HV C
and no drawings, in any format should be scaled
HV CABL
ABLES
.21
IL 183.35
IL 182.70
IL 182
225
100
PIG
150
MH (S) .74
AR
CL 183.32
ES
100
IL 181
100
MH (S) .80
CL 183.34
225
IL 181
A B C D E
4W
D = 640
8W
No 81
100
HV No 79 10
REFER TO MW
d0 0
.7
UP 100 ER CIG
T
TOP 183.42
CIG
25 UT
No 80
DRAWING 6505_503 100
IL
75 UTT
D=
183.
100
680
Cable Rises to High Level to Underdeck
Cable Buried 400mm BFFL
FOR DETAILED ZONE 1
D = 610
RWC
WEST CAR PARK

RWC 100 IL 183.22 MH (S)
100 IL 183.22
No 77
DRAINAGE 100 3.2 2
IL 18
HV
C
CA
No 78 G
9
181.1
UP MH (F) MH (F)
HV
RW P
BL
100
L)
IC (UT .87
CA
ES
CL. 183.750 CL. 183.870 CL 183
SW
d0.4
BL
C
150
UP
ES
G
G
181.4
0
IL. 181.550 IL. 180.950 183.8
4
MH (F)
10
RW P RW P
0
No 75 FW G
7
15
183.8
SW
d0
CL. 183.730 VP
150
100
.3
100
No 76 RE
FW
1
FW
FW
FW
RE
TM 10
0
100
FW SW
150
FW
150Ø
150
ER
150
SW
ER 150Ø IL. 180.620
225Ø
225Ø
H No 73 FW FW
SW FW FW FW
SW
15
0
SW
C
2 150Ø
SW
SW
150Ø
D = 200
0
No 74
AR LP
MH (S) Soakaway 225
CL. 183.820 Ø
EOT
AR
IL. 182.470 (Both Pipes)
3 Pit IL. 181.8 (A) MH (F)
UNI
No 72 C
CL. 183.020
No 71
IL. 179.930
LP MH (S)
UTT way
Soaka .48
M Sub Station
225
CL 179178.56 G
Pit IL 179.4
2 (A
R)
4
HV CABL 100 IL 179.08
ES G
7
179.4 RE
HALL
G
(A
4
(A
150 IL 179.08 179.4
R)
R)
100 IL 179.03
RE RE
LP 2 x 100
ducts
C
LP
5
G
No 52
EOT
6W
PTZ LP
No 51
UTTF d0.6
225Ø
225Ø
2 x 100 No 50
d0.9
No 70 No 69
LP ducts
LP
D = 500
No 68 D = 450
6
LP
ES
ABL
100
1
HV C
00
10
10
0 2 x 100
0
ducts
C G
6
179.6 MH F) .54
CL 179.57
IL 178
D = 100
150
0
10
7 MH (F) .56 0
G CL 179
HV
179.5
1 IL 177
.82
(R)
DRAINAGE NOTES
No 63 MH (S)
100
MH (F) .51
d0.5
G CL 179
.43
0
ES CL. 183.530 0 G IL 178
90
179.5
ABL
1
UTTF 179.5 G
1. All pipework to be 150mmØ Osma Ultrarib or
=
HV C
2
D
179.5
ER ER
ER
IL. 179.080 G
7
G
9 clayware, e.g. Hepworth, unless noted otherwise.
179.4 179.3
100
2. Inspection chambers to be Wavin Tegra 600
510
UTTF
150
D=
8 225Ø (UTT) RG
179.1
7
surrounded in mass concrete.
0
22 100
65
MH (F) .50 MH (F) .51
d0.4
=
CL 179 CL 179
3. Existing services shown in greyscale. Refer to
D
(UTL)
5Ø MH (S) IL 178
.74
IL 178
.32 IC
CL 179.45
10
D = 700
drawing 'Bath Buried Services Feb 2012' for
=5
Soakaway
D
existing services.
150
CL. 181.410 Access
No 66 MH (F) Pit IL. 177.840
Duct
CL 179
.54
10
0 U
TT 4. All external manholes/ inspection chambers to
No 67
9 CL. 182.940
IL. 178.210
G
177.2
4
MH (F) .62
CL 179.28
IL 178
T(UTL)
5.
have D400 lids, painted.
For proposed external levels refer to architects
150
G 10
3
LP 177.3 0
landscape drawing.
UTTF
UTTF 6. Aco channel drains to be 150mm deep with C250
CONNECT INTO MH (F) .57 No 49
covers to architects requirements.
D = 500
CL 179.25
150(
IL 178
6WS
203 EXISTING SYSTEM
10 7. All drainage to be CCTV surveyed on completion
AR )
)
150
IC(UTL .42
No 65 CL 179
No 64 Sealed
15
0 Acc ess ber
Access
in with manhole lid levels and invert survey and
225Ø -1:80 UTTF
Sealed
Plate
in Ch
am MH (F) .36
CL 179.96
Plate
Cham
ber
150
IL 176
T
UT 1 4 photographed for inclusion in the O & M to the
UTT
MH (F) .50
225 5 77.
CL 179.20 22 1
IL 178 MH (S) .52
C C
ABANDON THIS
LP
MH (S) .38
225
IL
CL 179.91
IL 176
satisfaction of the client.
MH (F) CL 179.24
IL 177
SECTION OF DRAIN FH
22 CL. 178.670
TM
HV
11 BACKDROP CONNECTION
5Ø IL. 177.990
T
T
LM
T KEY
10
DENOTES PROPOSED
0
No 62
FOUL WATER DRAINAGE
D = 600
PTZ C
D=
30
+ GL 179.860 LP
DENOTES PROPOSED
D = 860
0
12
10
100
Fire Hydrant
HV
150Ø -1:80 FWMH21 STORM WATER DRAINAGE
0
+ GL 179.740 + GL 179.740 + GL 179.790 MH (F)
C
300 PVC Firemain (Approximate Route)
LP
Ø
CL. TO MATCH
AB
CL. 179.780 DENOTES PROPOSED
LE
EXISTING GL
S
13 IL. 177.940 LAND DRAINAGE
FR
IL. 175.295
OM
+ GL 179.680
225
PROPOSED FOUL DRAINAGE
RE
LP
DENOTES PROPOSED
C
C
ROUTE (SET LOW TO ALLOW
HV
OR
+ GL 179.490 SECTION OF PIPE FOUL WATER MANHOLE
CA
D
REFER TO MW GL 179.420 + + GL 179.460 FOR POSSIBLE FUTURE
BL
PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED
ES
DEVELOPMENT CONNECTIONS) DENOTES PROPOSED
DRAWING 6505_504 C C SWALE AS BEING SURCHARGED LM
GL 179.140 + STORM WATER MANHOLE

FOR DETAILED ZONE 2 LP
DRAINAGE DENOTES EXISTING

W FOUL WATER DRAINAGE
UTTF
EXACT DRAINAGE POSITIONS DENOTES EXISTING
225
GL 178.900 + W
22 STORM WATER DRAINAGE

TO BE CO-ORDINATED AROUND LAY NEW SECTION OF FOUL DRAIN TO 5Ø
LM
DENOTES ABANDONED
FOR EXACT SERVICES DETAILS TEMPORARY CAR PARK RELIEVE SURCHARGING FROM LP
FOUL WATER DRAINAGE

REFER TO HOARE LEA DRAWING CHAMBER C - HIGHLIGHTED BY CAPITA
UTTF
225Ø -1:80
0511484-HL-XX-XX-DR-U-900-0002 DENOTES ABANDONED
STORM WATER DRAINAGE
FOUL WATER MANHOLE TO ADOPTABLE

LP
LP
FWMH STANDARDS - SEE SCHEDULE FOR SIZE
T
No 48 FOUL WATER PROPRIETARY
225
LP
FWIC POLYPROPYLENE INSPECTION CHAMBER
LP
STORM WATER MANHOLE TO ADOPTABLE

d0
UTT
B
IL ack
.4
17 D
7 . ro p
04 SWMH STANDARDS - SEE SCHEDULE FOR SIZE
BT
No 47
MH (F)
T
d0
.6
CL. 178.460
LM STORM WATER PROPRIETARY
SWIC
.4
POLYPROPYLENE INSPECTION CHAMBER

d0
IL 176.43
IL. 175.870 MH (S)
pit
Catch .16
.7
CL 178 176.37
d0
Pipe
Pit IL
IL
176.12 DENOTES EXISTING GROUND LEVEL
LP
+ GL ???.??? TAKEN FROM TOPO SURVEY
DENOTES AREA TO BE CAREFULLY
225Ø
HAND DUG TO AVOID SERVICES
225
FWMH22
d1
.3
.0
d0
d0.1 REV D E S CR I P T I O N BY DATE
CL. TO MATCH LP
EXISTING GL T1 ISSUED FOR DRAFT TENDER RJC 29.04.14

IL. 174.445 MH (S)
way
Soaka .81 T2 ISSUED FOR TENDER RJC 16.05.14
CL 177173.51
PNI
Pit IL
No 61
LP
LP
HV
CA
225Ø
LM
No 60
BL
Pit
Ca tch
100
150Ø -1:80
ES
MH(S) .26
CL 175
.66
IL 174
MH(S) .30 174.46
00
Pit IL
CL 175
1
.45
150 IL 174
d1
.3
SW
LM FWMH23
CL. 177.000
SW
(APPROX)
IL. 174.135
5
22
LP
e
Propan k
Gas Tan
.3
d0
SW
.4
LM
d0
Pit
Ca tch
MH(S) .82
CL 176
173.99
Pit IL
No d0
LP
UTT
.4
258 IL 174.15 No 46
SW
SW LP
.23
SW P-PRELIMINARY T-TENDER CONSTRUCTION
1S
225
1 74
SW MH(S) .56
CL 175
SW
IL
.27
SW IL 174 RW P
225
RE PROJECT
Route Plugged (R)
SW LP
G
175.3
2
LM
(R) MK
MH (F)
90(R) UNIVERSITY OF BATH
CL. 177.170
SW
d1
.6 FWMH24
CL. 176.650 IL. 174.880
F&R HEATING IN DUCT
SW
LP
IL. 173.970
150
LM RW P
10 WEST
225
No 59 RG
6
MH(S) .32 176.3
CL 175 ER
.52
IL 174
1 00
SW
G
6
176.1
SW
LODG
Ø
225
15 P
ay 0 SW
Soa kaw G RW
MH(S) .84
CL 175
E
Pipes) d0.3
.01(All
IL 174
173.7(
A) MH (S) .29
CL 175 174.71 ROUTE OUT TO TOP
100 IL 174.13
Pit IL MH (S)
Pit IL .99 way
100 Soaka .26
AR
IL 174
15
0( OF NORTH ROAD CL 176173.56
Pit IL
)
TTF
Fle
xib
LP LP
TITLE
(U
le T T
00
Pit )
Ca ble
SW 1
Telecom data duct (AR) 100(AR)

No 55 15
0(
Fle
x ib
Pit No 45
LP to 3 South Building
IC(UTL
)
L)
IC (UT .54
CL 175
PROPOSED SITE DRAINAGE
0
le Ca tch 5.6 2
100
10
) MH(S) .42 CL 17
No 44 CL 175
.80
IL 174
HV 174.52 G
Pit IL
ct
CAB G 175.7
2
Du
9
LES MH (F) 175.6
C a ata
RW P MH (S) .29
5.8 8 ER RW P
CL 175.77 CL 17 6
ble
/D
IL 177 3.4
IL 17
CONNECTION TO MAIN RUN
Op com
MH (F) MH (F) .57
(R)
5.6 1
.3
CL 17 4 CL 175.34
tic
15
d0
le
3.8
MD 0 IL 17 IL 174
Fi b n Te
C
re
100
Mai
100
LP
Stn F
4S
RW P
0
10
15 15
0(A 0
R)
G d0.3
RW P/ RW P MH (S)
5.7 1
CL 17 8
No 43 G
IL 17
4.2
100
7
175.3
15
0
MANNWILLIAMS
7 OLD KING STREET
QUEEN SQUARE
BATH BA1 2JW
T 01225 464419
F 01225 448651
RJC CW A1 1 : 500 APR 2014

STATUS
TENDER
PROJECT DRAWING REV
6505 501 T2
NOTES

A B C D E 2. All drawings are to be read in conjunction with the
8W
HV No 79 codes of practice
d0
.7
3. Any ambiguities or discrepancies between this
UP drawing and any other information given elsewhere
No 80 must be reported to Mann Williams for clarification
D=
before work proceeds
680
D = 610
work commences
PARK
No 77 5. Only figured or calculated dimensions should be used
HV
C
CA
No 78 G
9
181.1
HV
BL
REFER TO MW
CA
UP DRAWING 6505_503
ES
SW
BL
C
FOR DETAILED ZONE 1
ES
G
0
DRAINAGE
181.4
UP
10
RWP RWP
0
No 75 FW
15
150
SW
100
100
No 76 RE
FW
FW
FW
FW
SW RE
TM 10 ER
No 73
0
100
1 FW SW
150
FW
150
FW
150
ER
H FW
SW FW FW
SW
15 SW
0
2 SW
SW
D = 20
C
00
No 74 UP ROUTE OF EXISTING
AR STORMWATER
LP
DRAINAGE UNKNOWN
EOT
AR
No 71 No 72 C
M Sub Statio
HV CAB
LES
4 DRAINAGE NOTES
n
clayware, e.g. Hepworth, unless noted otherwise.
3. Existing services shown in greyscale. Refer to
drawing 'Bath Buried Services Feb 2012' for
existing services.
4. All external manholes/ inspection chambers to
C have D400 lids, painted.
5. For proposed external levels refer to architects
EOT 5 6.
landscape drawing.
Aco channel drains to be 150mm deep with C250
d0.6 LP covers to architects requirements.
UTTF
7. All drainage to be CCTV surveyed on completion
with manhole lid levels and invert survey and
photographed for inclusion in the O & M to the
LP satisfaction of the client.
No 70 No 69
KEY
LP DENOTES PROPOSED
D = 500 FOUL WATER DRAINAGE
No 68 D = 450
LP
ES DENOTES PROPOSED
6 ABL STORM WATER DRAINAGE
HV C
DENOTES PROPOSED
LAND DRAINAGE
DENOTES PROPOSED
FOUL WATER MANHOLE
D=1
000
DENOTES PROPOSED
STORM WATER MANHOLE
DENOTES EXISTING
FOUL WATER DRAINAGE
7 DENOTES EXISTING
HV STORM WATER DRAINAGE
DENOTES ABANDONED
0
ES FOUL WATER DRAINAGE
90
ABL
=
HV C
D
DENOTES ABANDONED
10
FWMH
=5
STANDARDS - SEE SCHEDULE FOR SIZE
D
8 FWIC FOUL WATER PROPRIETARY
0
65
d0.4
=
D
SWMH STORM WATER MANHOLE TO ADOPTABLE
SERVICES UNDER BUILDING
10
D = 700
=5
SWIC STORM WATER PROPRIETARY
RELOCATED AS PART OF
D
ENABLING WORKS PACKAGE,
SEE HOARE LEA DRAWINGS FOR SERVICE CLASHES SEE MANN
WILLIAMS DRAWING 6505_501
No 66 REV D E S CR I P T I O N BY DATE
T1 ISSUED FOR DRAFT TENDER RJC 29.04.14
9 T2 ISSUED FOR TENDER RJC 16.05.14
No 67
UTTF
D = 500
203
No 65 10
No 64
PROJECT
UNIVERSITY OF BATH
11
HV
D = 600 10 WEST
PTZ
D=
C TITLE
30
D = 860
PROPOSED DRAINAGE LAYOUT

HV
12
C
512
AB
01
LE
S
FR
13
OM
MANNWILLIAMS
RE

C
CO
HV
7 OLD KING STREET

RD
CA
QUEEN SQUARE
TO MAIN SEWER CONNECTION BATH BA1 2JW
BL
- SEE DRAWING 6505_501 SWALE

T 01225 464419
ES
REFER TO MW F 01225 448651

DRAWING 6505_504 C C E bath@mannwilliams.co.uk
FOR DETAILED ZONE 2 DRAWN CHKD SIZE SCALE DATE
DRAINAGE
RJC CW A1 1 : 200 APR 2014
GENERALLY NO DRAINAGE IS TO PASS THROUGH PADS. STATUS
RWP PASS ABOVE PADS

FWP PASS BETWEEN PADS AT PERIMETER OF BUILDING TENDER
PROJECT DRAWING REV
6505 502 T2
NOTES
FOUL WATER MANHOLE SCHEDULE
COVER INVERT LARGEST
LEVEL LEVEL DEPTH CONNECTING 2. All drawings are to be read in conjunction with the
REF. EASTING (m) NORTHING (m) (m) (m) TYPE MATERIAL COMMENTS (m) PIPE C D E project specification with all works carried out in
FWMH 180.000 178.445 1200Ø CONCRETE 1.555 150 DIA codes of practice
01 MANHOLE 3. Any ambiguities or discrepancies between this
FWMH 181.500 178.140 1200Ø CONCRETE 3.360 150 DIA drawing and any other information given elsewhere
must be reported to Mann Williams for clarification
02 MANHOLE before work proceeds
FWMH 181.500 177.840 1200Ø CONCRETE 3.660 225 DIA 4. All dimensions to be checked on site and any
03 MANHOLE discrepancies reported to the engineer before any
work commences
FWMH 180.975 177.680 1200Ø CONCRETE 3.295 225 DIA
04 MANHOLE 5. Only figured or calculated dimensions should be used
05 MANHOLE
06 MANHOLE
ACO DRAIN TO
FWMH 180.000 177.300 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.700 225 DIA BASE OF STAIRS
07 MANHOLE
08 MANHOLE
09 MANHOLE UP
SHALLOW MANHOLE IN
FWMH 181.500 178.925 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.575 150 DIA PEDESTRIAN ONLY AREA -
10 MANHOLE B CLIENT TO CONSIDER USING
PLASTIC INSPECTION CHAMBER
11 MANHOLE
12 MANHOLE 2 150Ø -1:2 1 150Ø LAND DRAIN -
H0 H0
FWMH 180.000 178.775 1200Ø CONCRETE 1.225 225 DIA A SW
M
SW
M ACO DRAIN ACROSS
DOOR OPENINGS
PERFORATED PIPE WITH
GRANULAR BACK FILL
150Ø -1:80
13 MANHOLE
512
02
3
14 MANHOLE H0 RWP REMAINS
MANHOLE INVERT LEVEL IS
M OUT OF THE INTERACTION
FWMH 180.625 178.595 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.030 225 DIA SW OUTSIDE BUILDING ZONE FOR BOTH 8 WEST &
AT LEVEL 1 150Ø -1:80 10 WEST FOUNDATIONS
15 MANHOLE
1
16 MANHOLE
FWMH 180.625 178.385 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.240 225 DIA 2
THIS SECTION OF PIPE LIKELY TO BE
17 MANHOLE H1
ACO DRAIN ACROSS VISIBLE IN FINISHES - ALLOW FOR M 2No. BACKDROP
FWMH 180.625 178.310 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.315 225 DIA DOOR OPENING SPECIAL, E.G. STAINLESS STEEL BOX SW
CONNECTIONS
PIPE ACROSS BASEMENT ROOF
18 MANHOLE
2 DRAINAGE NOTES
FWMH 180.000 176.615 1200Ø CONCRETE 3.385 225 DIA RWP
19 MANHOLE RODDABLE TRAPPED
clayware, e.g. Hepworth, unless noted otherwise.
FLOOR GULLEY
FWMH 179.740 176.340 1200Ø CONCRETE 3.400 225 DIA 2. Inspection chambers to be Wavin Tegra 600
150Ø -1:80
150Ø -1:40
20 MANHOLE RODDABLE TRAPPED 3. Refer to drawing 'Bath Buried Services Feb
FLOOR GULLEY 2012' for existing services.
FWMH 179.740 175.295 1200Ø CONCRETE 4.445 225 DIA RODDABLE TRAPPED 0
FLOOR GULLEY H1 4. All external manholes/ inspection chambers to
150Ø -1:69
21 MANHOLE 1 150Ø -1:40 M have D400 lids, painted.
H0 FW
M 150Ø -1:40 5. For proposed external levels refer to architects
FWMH 181.500 174.445 1200Ø CONCRETE 7.055 225 DIA FW landscape drawing.
22 MANHOLE RODDABLE TRAPPED 6. Aco channel drains to be 150mm deep with
FLOOR GULLEY C250 covers to architects requirements.
FWMH 177.000 174.135 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.865 225 DIA 7. All drainage to be CCTV surveyed on completion
150Ø LAND DRAIN -
23 MANHOLE PERFORATED PIPE WITH
photographed for inclusion in the O & M to the
FWMH 176.650 173.970 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.680 225 DIA GRANULAR BACK FILL
satisfaction of the client.
24 MANHOLE 03 TOE OF RETAINING WALL
512 ROCKER PIPES TO
150Ø -1:80
LOCALLY OMITTED FOR KEY
PLACEMENT OF MANHOLE BOTH PIPES, BOTH
SIDES OF THE WALL
SURFACE WATER MANHOLE SCHEDULE RODDING EYE
DENOTES PROPOSED
FOUL WATER DRAINAGE
RODDABLE TRAPPED
RWP
COVER INVERT LARGEST SHOWER GULLIES DENOTES PROPOSED
LEVEL LEVEL DEPTH CONNECTING 3
REF. EASTING (m) NORTHING (m) (m) (m) TYPE MATERIAL COMMENTS (m) PIPE 2No. BACKDROP
DENOTES PROPOSED
LAND DRAINAGE
SWMH 183.880 183.585 1200Ø CONCRETE 0.295 150 DIA ACO DRAIN ACROSS SVP WITH CONNECTIONS
DOOR OPENING RODDABLE RODDING POINT
01 MANHOLE TRAPPED GULLY
DENOTES PROPOSED
SWMH 181.500 179.715 1200Ø CONCRETE 1.785 150 DIA FOUL WATER MANHOLE
3
02 MANHOLE 4 ACO DRAIN TO H1
M
H0 BOTTOM OF RAMP RODDABLE
SW
SWMH 181.500 179.200 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.300 150 DIA M TRAPPED
03 MANHOLE SW GULLIES ACO DRAIN ACROSS
DOOR OPENINGS DENOTES PROPOSED
150Ø -1:80
SWMH 180.130 179.050 1200Ø CONCRETE 1.080 150 DIA 150Ø -1:49 STORM WATER MANHOLE
ABOVE GROUND
04 MANHOLE SINK CONNECTION 150Ø -1:40
SWMH 181.500 178.855 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.645 150 DIA DENOTES EXISTING
1 FOUL WATER DRAINAGE
05 MANHOLE SVP WITH H1
RODDING POINT M
RODDABLE TRAPPED ABOVE GROUND FW DENOTES EXISTING
SWMH 181.500 178.590 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.910 225 DIA SHOWER GULLIES SINK CONNECTION STORM WATER DRAINAGE
06 MANHOLE SVP WITH DENOTES ABANDONED
SWMH 180.340 178.210 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.130 225 DIA RODDING POINT FOUL WATER DRAINAGE
RODDABLE
07 MANHOLE 150Ø LAND DRAIN -
TRAPPED GULLY DENOTES ABANDONED
SWMH 180.000 178.055 1200Ø CONCRETE 1.945 225 DIA GRANULAR BACK FILL STORM WATER DRAINAGE
08 MANHOLE 2
RODDABLE
TRAPPED GULLY M
H1 4 FWMH
SWMH 180.000 177.950 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.050 225 DIA FW STANDARDS - SEE SCHEDULE FOR SIZE
09 MANHOLE
150Ø -1:80
150Ø -1:80
FOUL WATER PROPRIETARY

FWIC
SWMH 180.000 177.690 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.310 225 DIA POLYPROPYLENE INSPECTION CHAMBER
RODDABLE 150Ø -1:40
10 MANHOLE TRAPPED GULLY SWMH
STORM WATER MANHOLE TO ADOPTABLE
SWMH 180.000 177.415 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.585 225 DIA
STORM WATER PROPRIETARY
11 MANHOLE SWIC
SWMH 181.500 179.140 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.360 150 DIA 3
H1 FOR SERVICE CLASHES SEE MANN
12 MANHOLE SVP WITH M ACO DRAIN ACROSS
RODDING POINT FW DOOR OPENING WILLIAMS DRAWING 6505_501
13 MANHOLE REV D E S CR I P T I O N BY DATE
150Ø -1:40
150Ø -1:40
SVP WITH ACO DRAIN TO T1 ISSUED FOR DRAFT TENDER RJC 29.04.14
SWMH 179.910 178.100 1050Ø CONCRETE 1.810 150 DIA RODDING POINT BOTTOM OF RAMP T2 ISSUED FOR TENDER RJC 16.05.14
14 MANHOLE
SWMH 180.560 177.980 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.580 150 DIA ACO DRAIN ACROSS 1No. BACKDROP
15 MANHOLE DOOR OPENING CONNECTION
16 MANHOLE 4
H1
SWMH 180.000 177.550 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.450 225 DIA M 5
225Ø -1:80
RWP SW
17 MANHOLE
SWMH 179.500 177.130 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.370 225 DIA SVP WITH
150Ø LAND DRAIN -
RODDING POINT
18 MANHOLE PERFORATED PIPE WITH
GRANULAR BACK FILL 150Ø -1:40 150Ø -1:40
150Ø -1:80
4No. BACKDROP
CONNECTIONS 150Ø LAND DRAIN -
4 GRANULAR BACK FILL P-PRELIMINARY T-TENDER CONSTRUCTION
150Ø -1:80 H1 PROJECT
150Ø -1:80 M 2No. BACKDROP
5 6 SVP WITH FW
H0 H0
SW
M M RODDING POINT CONNECTIONS UNIVERSITY OF BATH
SW
150Ø -1:79
10 WEST
150Ø -1:80
225Ø -1:80
2 3
H0 H0
M M
FW FW
RWP
6 TITLE
3No. BACKDROP
CONNECTIONS
SVP WITH ZONE 1

RODDING POINT
5
H1 2No. BACKDROP
M
150Ø -1:40 SW CONNECTIONS
MANNWILLIAMS
225Ø -1:80
150Ø LAND DRAIN -

PERFORATED PIPE WITH 7 OLD KING STREET
GRANULAR BACK FILL QUEEN SQUARE
5
H1 BATH BA1 2JW
M
FW T 01225 464419
F 01225 448651
7 RJC CW A1 1 : 100 APR 2014

STATUS
TENDER
225Ø -1:80
225Ø -1:80
PROJECT DRAWING REV
SVP WITH
RODDING POINT 6505 503 T2
NOTES
FOUL WATER MANHOLE SCHEDULE 1. This drawing is copyright and may not be reproduced
C D E without permission of Mann Williams
COVER INVERT LARGEST 2. All drawings are to be read in conjunction with the
LEVEL LEVEL DEPTH CONNECTING project specification with all works carried out in
SVP WITH REF. EASTING (m) NORTHING (m) (m) (m) TYPE MATERIAL COMMENTS (m) PIPE accordance with the latest British Standards and
codes of practice
RODDING POINT FWMH 180.000 178.445 1200Ø CONCRETE 1.555 150 DIA
2No. BACKDROP 01 MANHOLE 3. Any ambiguities or discrepancies between this
150Ø -1:40 CONNECTIONS drawing and any other information given elsewhere
FWMH 181.500 178.140 1200Ø CONCRETE 3.360 150 DIA must be reported to Mann Williams for clarification
02 MANHOLE before work proceeds
FWMH 181.500 177.840 1200Ø CONCRETE 3.660 225 DIA 4. All dimensions to be checked on site and any
03 MANHOLE
225Ø -1:80
150Ø LAND DRAIN - work commences
PERFORATED PIPE WITH FWMH 180.975 177.680 1200Ø CONCRETE 3.295 225 DIA
GRANULAR BACK FILL 5. Only figured or calculated dimensions should be used
5 04 MANHOLE
H1 and no drawings, in any format should be scaled
M FWMH 180.530 177.560 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.970 225 DIA
FW
05 MANHOLE
06 MANHOLE
7 FWMH 180.000 177.300 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.700 225 DIA
07 MANHOLE
08 MANHOLE
225Ø -1:80
225Ø -1:80
SVP WITH 09 MANHOLE
RODDING POINT FWMH 181.500 178.925 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.575 150 DIA
150Ø -1:79
10 MANHOLE
150Ø LAND DRAIN - FWMH 180.000 178.820 1200Ø CONCRETE 1.180 150 DIA
150Ø -1:40 PERFORATED PIPE WITH
GRANULAR BACK FILL
11 MANHOLE
6
H1 12 MANHOLE
M
SVP WITH FW
4 150Ø -1:40 RODDING POINT FWMH 180.000 178.775 1200Ø CONCRETE 1.225 225 DIA
H0 13 MANHOLE
M
FW 1No. BACKDROP
SVP WITH CONNECTION FWMH 180.625 178.690 1200Ø CONCRETE 1.935 225 DIA
RODDING POINT 14 MANHOLE
RWP FWMH 180.625 178.595 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.030 225 DIA
8 15 MANHOLE
16 MANHOLE
17 MANHOLE
225Ø -1:80
6 FWMH 180.625 178.310 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.315 225 DIA

H1
M 18 MANHOLE DRAINAGE NOTES
SW
FWMH 180.000 176.615 1200Ø CONCRETE 3.385 225 DIA 1. All pipework to be 150mmØ Osma Ultrarib or
150Ø LAND DRAIN -
PERFORATED PIPE WITH 19 MANHOLE clayware, e.g. Hepworth, unless noted otherwise.
225Ø -1:80
GRANULAR BACK FILL FWMH 179.740 176.340 1200Ø CONCRETE 3.400 225 DIA surrounded in mass concrete.
20 MANHOLE 3. Refer to drawing 'Bath Buried Services Feb
2012' for existing services.
FWMH 179.740 175.295 1200Ø CONCRETE 4.445 225 DIA 4. All external manholes/ inspection chambers to
21 MANHOLE have D400 lids, painted.
5. For proposed external levels refer to architects
FWMH 181.500 174.445 1200Ø CONCRETE 7.055 225 DIA landscape drawing.
6. Aco channel drains to be 150mm deep with
22 MANHOLE C250 covers to architects requirements.
FWMH 177.000 174.135 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.865 225 DIA 7. All drainage to be CCTV surveyed on completion
23 MANHOLE photographed for inclusion in the O & M to the
9 FWMH 176.650 173.970 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.680 225 DIA satisfaction of the client.
SVP WITH 24 MANHOLE

SVP WITH KEY
RODDING POINT RODDING POINT
1No. BACKDROP
DENOTES PROPOSED
CONNECTION
M
H0
5
150Ø -1:40 SURFACE WATER MANHOLE SCHEDULE FOUL WATER DRAINAGE
FW 7 DENOTES PROPOSED
H1 COVER INVERT LARGEST STORM WATER DRAINAGE
M
FW LEVEL LEVEL DEPTH CONNECTING DENOTES PROPOSED
REF. EASTING (m) NORTHING (m) (m) (m) TYPE MATERIAL COMMENTS (m) PIPE LAND DRAINAGE
225Ø -1:80
01 MANHOLE DENOTES PROPOSED
FOUL WATER MANHOLE
225Ø -1:80

02 MANHOLE
DENOTES PROPOSED
CONCRETE ENCASE 03 MANHOLE STORM WATER MANHOLE
7 SHALLOW DEPTH SWMH 180.130 179.050 1200Ø CONCRETE 1.080 150 DIA
H0 LAND DRAIN RUN
M 04 MANHOLE
SW DENOTES EXISTING
SWMH 181.500 178.855 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.645 150 DIA FOUL WATER DRAINAGE
10 05 MANHOLE DENOTES EXISTING
1No. BACKDROP SWMH 181.500 178.590 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.910 225 DIA
CONNECTION 06 MANHOLE DENOTES ABANDONED
SVP WITH FOUL WATER DRAINAGE
RODDING POINT SWMH 180.340 178.210 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.130 225 DIA
DENOTES ABANDONED
07 MANHOLE STORM WATER DRAINAGE
8
H1 SWMH 180.000 178.055 1200Ø CONCRETE 1.945 225 DIA
M
SVP WITH FW 08 MANHOLE FOUL WATER MANHOLE TO ADOPTABLE
225Ø -1:80
RODDING POINT FWMH

6 150Ø -1:40 STANDARDS - SEE SCHEDULE FOR SIZE
H0 SWMH 180.000 177.950 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.050 225 DIA
M FOUL WATER PROPRIETARY
FW 09 MANHOLE FWIC
SWMH 180.000 177.690 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.310 225 DIA STORM WATER MANHOLE TO ADOPTABLE
SWMH
10 MANHOLE STANDARDS - SEE SCHEDULE FOR SIZE
SWMH 180.000 177.415 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.585 225 DIA SWIC
STORM WATER PROPRIETARY
11 MANHOLE
SWMH 181.500 179.140 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.360 150 DIA FOR SERVICE CLASHES SEE MANN
12 MANHOLE WILLIAMS DRAWING 6505_501
SWMH 180.000 178.245 1050Ø CONCRETE 1.755 150 DIA REV D E S CR I P T I O N BY DATE
RWP 13 MANHOLE T1 ISSUED FOR DRAFT TENDER RJC 29.04.14
11 SWMH 179.910 178.100 1050Ø CONCRETE 1.810 150 DIA T2 ISSUED FOR TENDER RJC 16.05.14
14 MANHOLE
1No. BACKDROP SWMH 180.560 177.980 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.580 150 DIA
CONNECTION
225Ø -1:80
15 MANHOLE
RWP FROM SWMH 181.200 177.810 1200Ø CONCRETE 3.390 225 DIA
BIN STORE 7
H1 16 MANHOLE
M
SW SWMH 180.000 177.550 1200Ø CONCRETE 2.450 225 DIA
17 MANHOLE
18 MANHOLE
8
H0 ACO DRAIN
225Ø -1:80
TRAPPED M ACROSS DOOR

GULLY FROM SW OPENING
BIN STORE
PROJECT
H2
0 UNIVERSITY OF BATH
M
12 FW
225Ø -1:81
225Ø -1:80
GULLY
10 WEST
150Ø -1:40
SVP WITH
RODDING POINT
7 0.75m DEEP x 3.3m WIDE x 25.0m LONG TITLE
H0 HIGH LEVEL PIPE OVER ACO DRAIN SOAKAWAY FORMED FROM AQUACELL
M
FW ACROSS DOOR
OPENING
PLASTIC CRATES
SVP FROM ABOVE
1No. BACKDROP
CONNECTION
13 ZONE 2
8 PIPE INLET LEVEL T.B.C.

8 225Ø -1:80 9 9 H1 DEPENDANT ON FINAL
M
H0 H0 H1 SW GROUND LEVELS
M M M 225Ø
FW FW FW MANNWILLIAMS
9 225Ø -1:51 0 1 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
H0 H1 H1 7 OLD KING STREET
M M M
SW SW SW QUEEN SQUARE
BATH BA1 2JW
1No. BACKDROP T 01225 464419
CONNECTION F 01225 448651
512
-
EXACT SWALE LOCATION TO BE
CONFIRMED WITH LANDSCAPE TEAM - RJC CW A1 1 : 100 APR 2014
FINAL LEVELS OF THIS AREA REQUIRED STATUS
TENDER
PROJECT DRAWING REV
6505 504 T2
39 NOTES
45 45
16 1. This drawing is copyright and may not be reproduced
without the permission of Mann Williams
FFL 38 30 35 FFL
41 SSL 100 SSL 2. This drawing is not to be scaled
41 FGL FGL
MINIMUM
16 38 17 discrepancies reported to the engineer before work
0.275m
FFL FFL 30 32 SURROUND PIPE IN CONCRETE
0.45m MINIMUM
SSL SSL 42 commences
100
27 WHERE PIPE HAS LESS THAN
FGL 300mm COVER TO UNDERSIDE 4. Any ambiguities or discrepancies between this drawing
28 29 OF GROUND SUPPORTED SLAB and any other information given elsewhere must be
0.485m MINIMUM
17 OR SUSPENDED FLOOR VOID reported to Mann Williams for clarification before work
0.5m MINIMUM
17 30 19
39 proceeds
44
30 36 5. All drawings to be read in conjunction with the project
40 26 specification with all works carried out in accordance
32 with the latest British Standards and codes
15 of practice
CONTINUING PIPE AT
31
INTERMEDIATE LOCATION
END OF RUN . .
19
40 LOCATION
40 32
32
EXTERNAL SINK WASTE
DETAIL A DIRECT RAINWATER DETAIL B DIRECT RAINWATER DETAIL C INTO TRAPPED BACK DETAIL D RODDING POINT DETAIL E INTERNAL SINK WASTE
1:20 -
CONNECTION 1:20 -
CONNECTION THROUGH GULLY 1:20 -
INLET GULLY 1:20 - 1:20 -
PIPE CONNECTION
67
155
62 68 67 FINISHED
SURFACE LEVEL
21 FGL FGL
25
48
20
16 61
168 63
FFL FFL 24
SSL SSL 66
52
FGL FGL
17 27 51
0.45m MINIMUM
0.45m MINIMUM
53
900
22 22
10 M
27 17 450mmØ
IN MU
28
23 23
E 1 INI
OP M
19
SL BLE.
60 58
50
19
RIA
150
VA
18 59
26 18 26
0Ø
MINIMUM BASE
64
15
150
150 max 07 13 54
150 max 06 57
THICKNESS
15 15
17 17
65
15
DETAIL F INTERNAL DETAIL G GROUND FLOOR SECTION H PRECAST CONCRETE SECTION J SECTION K ROAD GULLY
1:20 -
S.V.P OUTLET 1:20 -
W.C. OUTLET 1:20 ---
INSPECTION CHAMBER 1:20 --- 1:20 ---
DEPTH TO SOFFIT
LESS THAN 1.0m
NOTES: DEPTH OF PIPE COVER 900mm x 600mm minimum clear opening with Reinforced concrete cover and reducing slab Cover and frame for light duty use to be precast Round or square road gully with grating and frame Inlet adaptors to be used to connect 100mm
Pipes laid at shallow depths should be adequately 01 11 Brick arch over pipe. 24 Waste manifold where required. 36 Short radius 90 degree bend. 50 62 71 80
Class D400 or Class B125 ductile iron cover and bedded with mortar, proprietary bitumen or resin concrete to BS 5911: Part 200, for heavy duty to BS EN 124, Grade B as detailed on drainage layout diameter pipes to 150mm inlets.
1. Insitu concrete generally to be GEN4 S.R.P.C. protected. Where pipes laid less than 1000mm below frame to BS EN 124, see drainage schedule. mastic sealant. locations use metal cover and frame on engineering and schedules, set in 1:3 cement and sand mortar
designated mix, thoroughly compacted. Minimum 150mm GEN4 S.R.P.C. designated mix 25 WC pan connector. 37 Incoming surface water drain.
formation level, or less than 900mm in fields & gardens, 12 brick shaft on flat top reducer. Covers and frames to centrally over gully chamber. 81 Unused inlets to be sealed with a blanking off plug.
insitu concrete bed. Minimum 75mm concrete
protection should be provided. 1220mm x 685mm minimum clear opening with 51 Construction joint. be initially bedded loose for final adjustment to suit
2. Insitu reinforced concrete to be RC35 designated mix, 02 blinding to be provided Insitu concrete surround carried up to underside of Square hopper with back inlet and alloy grid or
Class D400 or Class B125 ductile iron cover and 26 38 finished levels. Round or square gully grid; black cast iron to drives Ensure cover loads are taken in concrete collar only
ONLY when specified. Rigid Pipes:- 100mmØ with less than 300mm cover, or • to protect the bottom of the excavation if ground supported slab or to SSL with beam and sealing plate. 72 82
frame to BS EN 124, see drainage schedule. Bottom chamber section to be built into base with a bituminous surface and alloy finish elsewhere. when used.
150Ø pipes or greater with less than 600mm cover should there is a delay in pouring structural concrete. block floor, flooring blocks omitted locally to allow 52
concrete minimum 100mm. Where chambers constructed wholly above the
3. Where sulphates present, Consulting Engineer to be surrounded in 150mm of concrete with joints at • to provide sufficient support to ensure cover is insitu concrete to carry through. 39 Cement mortar joint/ infill. 63 83 Backdrop pipe set vertically.
Where approved by the Adopting Council/ water table, rebated joints to be sealed in 1:3 73 Catchment bucket.
confirm concrete & mortar specification. 5000mm maximum centres. 03 maintained to reinforcement where required. Minimum distance between top of pipe and
Undertaker, PVCu pipes and fitting may be cement and sand mortar. In water logged ground or
• where excavation has been slightly over dug. 27
Seal around pipe where passing through damp
40
100mm bed of selected as dug or granular material; 53 underside of precast chamber to be 100mm. Minimum 100mm thick GEN 4 concrete surround. Minimum of two rocker pipes; additional rocker
Flexible Pipes:- with less than 600mm cover, NOT under a submitted for clayware pipes shown. When PVCu where water table is above the base, joints should 74
4. All insitu concrete to be thoroughly compacted. road, should be protected with a layer of concrete paving • where localised soft spots have been removed. proof membrane. if ground conditions unstable (Site Control to 84 pipes may be necessary to accommodate transition
pipes are used, concrete bed and surround MUST be made water tight with a rubber/ bitumen flexible
confirm) use 100mm bed of GEN4 designated mix
slabs with at least 75mm layer of granular material be extended a minimum of 600mm from the inside 54 Short length pipe to be similar length to rocker pipe. jointing compound. Where chambers are 100mm bed of selected as dug or granular material; of pipe gradient to vertical downpipe. Care to be
5. For types and sizes of pipes and fittings refer to Pipe joint with channel to be located 100mm inside 28 45 degree bend. insitu concrete. 75
between pipe and slab, or surrounded in 150mm face of the chamber, see drainage schedules. 13 constructed in unstable ground (site control are to if ground conditions are unstable (site control to taken to maintain flexibility of joints.
drainage layout and schedule. face of manhole. Self cleaning toe holes to be provided in benching
concrete. Flexible pipes under roads with less than 29 55 confirm) or likely to be subjected to exceptional or confirm) use 150mm bed of GEN 4 designated mix
Oblique 45 degree junction. 41 PVCu rainwater down pipe. (CSS)
900mm cover should be protected in reinforced concrete 1:3 cement and sand mortar haunching & bedding of sewer where channel exceeds 600mm wide. eccentric loads a 150mm think GEN 4 concrete insitu concrete, placing chamber in position whilst Splash guard/pipe stopper in rodding eye attached
6. Drainage pipes and fittings to be Hepworth vitrified 04 14 Double steps to BS 1247, Parts 1, 2 & 3. OR, 85
bridging slabs of adequate strength. to cover frame. surround should be provided after jointing with 1:3 concrete is still wet in order that it may adopt the to chain bolted to wall if required by the
clay and PVCu, or Wavin Osma PVCu or other equal polypropylene encapsulated steps. 30 150mm selected dug or granular material backfill Insitu concrete dished surround where required as
42 Minimum 225mm GEN4 S.R.P.C. Designated mix cement and sand mortar. shape of the chamber base. undertaker/ council.
and approved. Refer to drainage layout and schedules packed and rammed firmly around pipes and indicated on working drawings. 56
Benching slope to be 1 in 10 to 1 in 30 of 20mm insitu concrete bed, on minimum 75mm concrete
for details of manufacturer and specification. 05 15 Minimum 150mm think GEN4 concrete surround. fittings until adequate support achieved.
Table 1: minimum thickness high strength GEN4 S.R.P.C. blinding. 64 Rocker pipe. Inspection chamber base with 100 or 150mm
43 Curved square junction. 76
granolithic concrete topping to be brought up to a 16 diameter drain connections.
7. Manhole width should be increased for pipes larger Adaptor/ reducer. 31 100mm bed of suitable as dug or granular material.
Nominal Diameter Rocker Pipe dense smooth finish with a steel trowel, neatly 57 GEN 4 Designated mix insitu concrete bed. 65 Precast concrete road gully to BS5911: Part 230.
than 150mmØ to give 225mm benching each side 44 Low back 'P' trap.
(mm) Effective Length (m) shaped to all connections. 17 Concrete bed and surround will be required only Polypropylene inspection chamber shaft providing
with brickwork or precast masonry units corbelled to Pipe cut to required length. 32 20mm minimum thickness 1:3 cement and sand 77
45 PVCu waste pipe. 58 66 Mild steel stopper and chain galvanised to BS 479. set inverts using standard height sections or
suit over. where fittings are installed in soft landscaped areas
150 to 600 0.6 06 Inverts formed generally using channel pipes. rendering. intermediate inverts by site cutting shaft sections to
18 Flexible joint and rocker pipe 600MM maximum subjected to heavy construction traffic.
675 to 750 1.0 Square hopper with sealing plate. Road and pavement surfacing and kerbs as detailed the required height.
8. Manhole length consider side with greater number of overall length. 46 67
750 and over 1.25 Flexible joint to be as close as practicable to outside Rocker pipes 600mm maximum overall length on road cross section drawings.
branches, allow 300mm for each 100mm or 150mmØ 07 225/250mm diameter shallow inspection chamber 59
face of manhole to permit satisfactory joint and 33 required to entry and exits to accommodate 150mm minimum width GEN4 designated mix insitu
branch plus adequate allowance at downstream end 19 Rest bend, for use up to two storey only. providing inverts up to 600mm in plastic or vitrified 600mm minimum clear opening with class D400 or 78
subsequent movement. 47 differential movement, where considerable Road gully grating and frame to BS EN 124 Grade A concrete collar around top of shaft to provide seating
Table 2: clay; vitrified clay invert can be increased to 750mm class B125 ductile iron cover & frame to BS EN 124. 68
for angle of entry. Manholes with curved channels differential movement anticipated several rocker or B, as required by Highways Authority, set in 1:3 for cover and frame in unadopted hard landscaped
require special requirements. 20 Access pipe fitting. when means of access required for rodding only. Refer to drainage schedule.
08 Rocker pipe, refer to table 1 for details. pipes should be laid and the gradient should if cement and sand mortar centrally over gully areas; concrete collar not required in unadopted soft
Largest Pipe Diameter Internal Diameter necessary be increased locally to avoid possibility of chamber. landscaped areas, unless accessed by construction
in Manhole (mm) of Manhole (mm) 21 110mm diameter soil vent pipe. Grade C light duty sealed plastic or alloy cover and Class B engineering brick or precast concrete
9. All covers to be stamped 'FW' of 'SW' as appropriate. Brickwork or precast masonry unit corbelled to suit 34 48 a back fall developing. vehicles.
09 frame for use in areas inaccessible for motor masonry units or precast concrete cover frame
cover to a maximum of 30mm per course. Prestressed concrete lintel(s) positioned to provide vehicles. seating rings, 4 courses maximum or 2 courses min. Round or square polypropylene or vitrified clay
10. The design of manholes will need to comply with the Less than 375 1200 (1050 where depth 22 60 Benching slope to be no flatter than 1:12. 69
a minimum of 50mm clearance around pipe. gully. Grade C light duty cast iron circular cover in a plastic
undertaker's safety policy. to soffit is 1.35 - 1.5m) 79
215mm minimum thickness solid class B Grade C light duty oval cover, sealing ring & rodding Precast concrete chamber sections and cover slab, frame in unadopted areas in accessible to motor
375 to 450 1350 10 engineering brickwork in English bond, or precast 35 49 Precast concrete chamber system comprising
6mm calcium silicate board permanent shuttering eye in 100mm insitu concrete surround set level all to BS 5911: Part 200, to be bedded with mortar, 61 70 Rubber plug. vehicles; in unadopted hard landscaped areas use
11. Boxed arrows indicate minimum invert depth for use 500 to 700 1500 masonry units, with fully filled joints in 1:3 cement 23 chamber wall sections, reducer slabs & shaft wall
each side of wall. with finished ground level. proprietary bitumen or resin mastic sealant. Grade B1 or B2 cast iron circular covers and frames to
when calculating drainage levels. 750 to 900 1800 sections to BS 5911: Part 200.
& sand mortar, flush jointed as work proceeds. BS EN 124, as detailed in the layout & schedules.
T1 ISSUED FOR DRAFT TENDER GED 29.04.14
T2 ISSUED FOR TENDER RJC 16.05.14
L1 N1
--- 47
62 ---
04
FGL FGL FGL FGL
43 17
48
675 max
675 max
85
14
50
49
CHAMBER HEIGHT NOT LESS THAN 900mm
INVERT OF RODDING EYE IS TO BE

NO GREATER THAN 1.5 m ABOVE
84 PROJECT
250
61
250
VARIABLE DIAMETER, REFER TO TABLE 2
14
49 UNIVERSITY OF BATH
TOP OF BENCHING
250
63 CAST INTEGRAL 10 WEST
WITH MANHOLE 15
SURROUND
52 15 TITLE
51 53
03
DRAINAGE
05
53 600 max
83 DETAILS
20
500 min 225 min

13
60 58
51 SHEET 1
150
59
100
64 06
MINIMUM BASE
07
06
57 13 54
36 MANN WILLIAMS
52
THICKNESS

L1 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
---
225
51
12 56 4 PALACE YARD MEWS
BATH BA1 2NH
T +44 (0)1225 464419
TO BARREL
55 F +44 (0)1225 448651

06 08 08
OF PIPE
N1 07 54 56 54 07 E bath@mannwilliams.co.uk
--- DRAWN CHKD SIZE SCALE DATE
RCJ PB A1 NTS APRIL 14

STATUS
SECTION L PRECAST CONCRETE MANHOLE SECTION M SECTION N PRECAST CONCRETE RING MANHOLE DETAIL SECTION N1 SECTION P BACKDROP MANHOLE TENDER
1:20 ---
DEPTH TO SOFFIT 1.0 TO 2.7m MAXIMUM 1:20 --- 1:20 ---
DEPTH TO SOFFIT 1.45 TO 3.0m MAXIMUM 1:20 --- 1:20 ---
PROJECT DRAWING REV
6505 511 T2
NOTES

without the permission of Mann Williams
2. This drawing is not to be scaled

discrepancies reported to the engineer before work
commences
1 2
4. Any ambiguities or discrepancies between this drawing
and any other information given elsewhere must be
reported to Mann Williams for clarification before work
proceeds
5. All drawings to be read in conjunction with the project

specification with all works carried out in accordance
with the latest British Standards and codes
of practice
. .
INLET PIPE
DRY SWALE BED PLANTED RWP EXITS AT LEVEL 1 RC COLUMN
1200
WRAP TO CONTINUE 1m UP. 1.2 m DEEP x 25 m LONG.
INTO ADJACENT LANDSCAPE FREE VOLUME 83.5m3
SHS RUNS FLAT STAINLESS STEEL
LARGE GRANULAR BACKFILL INTO MANHOLE 150x150 SHS ACTING AS
UNDER TOPSOIL STORM PIPE IN FINISHES RC UPSTAND
FGL
SSL (LEVEL 1)
500
TERRAM GEO FILTER
WRAP CRATES
750
SOAKAWAY FORMED
FROM AQUACELL RC RETAINING WALL
PLASTIC CRATES,
TOTAL 25m LENGTH
3300
FILTRATION INTO GROUND
DISTRIBUTION PIPE
SECTION 01 SWALE SECTION 02 LEVEL 1 RWP IN

1:20 502 1:20 502
EXTERNAL FINISHES
NOTES: DEPTH OF PIPE COVER 900mm x 600mm minimum clear opening with Reinforced concrete cover and reducing slab Cover and frame for light duty use to be precast Round or square road gully with grating and frame Inlet adaptors to be used to connect 100mm
Pipes laid at shallow depths should be adequately 01 11 Brick arch over pipe. 24 Waste manifold where required. 36 Short radius 90 degree bend. 50 62 71 80
Class D400 or Class B125 ductile iron cover and bedded with mortar, proprietary bitumen or resin concrete to BS 5911: Part 200, for heavy duty to BS EN 124, Grade B as detailed on drainage layout diameter pipes to 150mm inlets.
1. Insitu concrete generally to be GEN4 S.R.P.C. protected. Where pipes laid less than 1000mm below frame to BS EN 124, see drainage schedule. mastic sealant. locations use metal cover and frame on engineering and schedules, set in 1:3 cement and sand mortar
designated mix, thoroughly compacted. Minimum 150mm GEN4 S.R.P.C. designated mix 25 WC pan connector. 37 Incoming surface water drain.
formation level, or less than 900mm in fields & gardens, 12 brick shaft on flat top reducer. Covers and frames to centrally over gully chamber. 81 Unused inlets to be sealed with a blanking off plug.
insitu concrete bed. Minimum 75mm concrete
protection should be provided. 1220mm x 685mm minimum clear opening with 51 Construction joint. be initially bedded loose for final adjustment to suit
2. Insitu reinforced concrete to be RC35 designated mix, 02 blinding to be provided Insitu concrete surround carried up to underside of Square hopper with back inlet and alloy grid or
Class D400 or Class B125 ductile iron cover and 26 38 finished levels. Round or square gully grid; black cast iron to drives Ensure cover loads are taken in concrete collar only
ONLY when specified. Rigid Pipes:- 100mmØ with less than 300mm cover, or • to protect the bottom of the excavation if ground supported slab or to SSL with beam and sealing plate. 72 82
frame to BS EN 124, see drainage schedule. Bottom chamber section to be built into base with a bituminous surface and alloy finish elsewhere. when used.
150Ø pipes or greater with less than 600mm cover should there is a delay in pouring structural concrete. block floor, flooring blocks omitted locally to allow 52
concrete minimum 100mm. Where chambers constructed wholly above the
3. Where sulphates present, Consulting Engineer to be surrounded in 150mm of concrete with joints at • to provide sufficient support to ensure cover is insitu concrete to carry through. 39 Cement mortar joint/ infill. 63
Where approved by the Adopting Council/ water table, rebated joints to be sealed in 1:3 73 Catchment bucket.
confirm concrete & mortar specification. 5000mm maximum centres. 03 maintained to reinforcement where required. Minimum distance between top of pipe and
Undertaker, PVCu pipes and fitting may be cement and sand mortar. In water logged ground or
• where excavation has been slightly over dug. Seal around pipe where passing through damp
40
100mm bed of selected as dug or granular material; 53 underside of precast chamber to be 100mm.
Flexible Pipes:- with less than 600mm cover, NOT under a submitted for clayware pipes shown. When PVCu 27 where water table is above the base, joints should 74 Minimum 100mm thick GEN 4 concrete surround.
4. All insitu concrete to be thoroughly compacted. • where localised soft spots have been removed. proof membrane. if ground conditions unstable (Site Control to
road, should be protected with a layer of concrete paving pipes are used, concrete bed and surround MUST be made water tight with a rubber/ bitumen flexible
confirm) use 100mm bed of GEN4 designated mix
slabs with at least 75mm layer of granular material be extended a minimum of 600mm from the inside 54 Short length pipe to be similar length to rocker pipe. jointing compound. Where chambers are 100mm bed of selected as dug or granular material;
5. For types and sizes of pipes and fittings refer to Pipe joint with channel to be located 100mm inside 28 45 degree bend. insitu concrete. 75
between pipe and slab, or surrounded in 150mm face of the chamber, see drainage schedules. 13 constructed in unstable ground (site control are to if ground conditions are unstable (site control to
drainage layout and schedule. face of manhole. Self cleaning toe holes to be provided in benching
concrete. Flexible pipes under roads with less than 29 55 confirm) or likely to be subjected to exceptional or confirm) use 150mm bed of GEN 4 designated mix
Oblique 45 degree junction. 41 PVCu rainwater down pipe. (CSS)
900mm cover should be protected in reinforced concrete 1:3 cement and sand mortar haunching & bedding of sewer where channel exceeds 600mm wide. eccentric loads a 150mm think GEN 4 concrete insitu concrete, placing chamber in position whilst
6. Drainage pipes and fittings to be Hepworth vitrified 04 14 Double steps to BS 1247, Parts 1, 2 & 3. OR,
bridging slabs of adequate strength. to cover frame. 150mm selected dug or granular material backfill Insitu concrete dished surround where required as surround should be provided after jointing with 1:3 concrete is still wet in order that it may adopt the
clay and PVCu, or Wavin Osma PVCu or other equal polypropylene encapsulated steps. 30 42 Minimum 225mm GEN4 S.R.P.C. Designated mix
packed and rammed firmly around pipes and indicated on working drawings. 56 cement and sand mortar. shape of the chamber base.
and approved. Refer to drainage layout and schedules Benching slope to be 1 in 10 to 1 in 30 of 20mm insitu concrete bed, on minimum 75mm concrete
for details of manufacturer and specification. 05 15 Minimum 150mm think GEN4 concrete surround. fittings until adequate support achieved.
Table 1: minimum thickness high strength GEN4 S.R.P.C. blinding. 64 Rocker pipe. Inspection chamber base with 100 or 150mm
43 Curved square junction. 76
granolithic concrete topping to be brought up to a 16 diameter drain connections.
7. Manhole width should be increased for pipes larger Adaptor/ reducer. 31 100mm bed of suitable as dug or granular material.
Nominal Diameter Rocker Pipe dense smooth finish with a steel trowel, neatly 57 GEN 4 Designated mix insitu concrete bed. 65 Precast concrete road gully to BS5911: Part 230.
than 150mmØ to give 225mm benching each side 44 Low back 'P' trap.
(mm) Effective Length (m) shaped to all connections. 17 Concrete bed and surround will be required only Polypropylene inspection chamber shaft providing
with brickwork or precast masonry units corbelled to Pipe cut to required length. 32 20mm minimum thickness 1:3 cement and sand 77
45 PVCu waste pipe. 58 66 Mild steel stopper and chain galvanised to BS 479. set inverts using standard height sections or
suit over. where fittings are installed in soft landscaped areas
150 to 600 0.6 06 Inverts formed generally using channel pipes. rendering. intermediate inverts by site cutting shaft sections to
18 Flexible joint and rocker pipe 600MM maximum subjected to heavy construction traffic.
675 to 750 1.0 Square hopper with sealing plate. Road and pavement surfacing and kerbs as detailed the required height.
8. Manhole length consider side with greater number of overall length. 46 67
750 and over 1.25 Flexible joint to be as close as practicable to outside Rocker pipes 600mm maximum overall length on road cross section drawings.
branches, allow 300mm for each 100mm or 150mmØ 07 225/250mm diameter shallow inspection chamber 59
face of manhole to permit satisfactory joint and 33 required to entry and exits to accommodate 150mm minimum width GEN4 designated mix insitu
branch plus adequate allowance at downstream end 19 Rest bend, for use up to two storey only. providing inverts up to 600mm in plastic or vitrified 600mm minimum clear opening with class D400 or 78
subsequent movement. 47 differential movement, where considerable Road gully grating and frame to BS EN 124 Grade A concrete collar around top of shaft to provide seating
Table 2: clay; vitrified clay invert can be increased to 750mm class B125 ductile iron cover & frame to BS EN 124. 68
for angle of entry. Manholes with curved channels differential movement anticipated several rocker or B, as required by Highways Authority, set in 1:3 for cover and frame in unadopted hard landscaped
require special requirements. 20 Access pipe fitting. when means of access required for rodding only. Refer to drainage schedule.
08 Rocker pipe, refer to table 1 for details. pipes should be laid and the gradient should if cement and sand mortar centrally over gully areas; concrete collar not required in unadopted soft
Largest Pipe Diameter Internal Diameter necessary be increased locally to avoid possibility of chamber. landscaped areas, unless accessed by construction
in Manhole (mm) of Manhole (mm) 21 110mm diameter soil vent pipe. Grade C light duty sealed plastic or alloy cover and Class B engineering brick or precast concrete
9. All covers to be stamped 'FW' of 'SW' as appropriate. Brickwork or precast masonry unit corbelled to suit 34 48 a back fall developing. vehicles.
09 frame for use in areas inaccessible for motor masonry units or precast concrete cover frame
cover to a maximum of 30mm per course. Prestressed concrete lintel(s) positioned to provide vehicles. seating rings, 4 courses maximum or 2 courses min. Round or square polypropylene or vitrified clay
10. The design of manholes will need to comply with the Less than 375 1200 (1050 where depth 22 60 Benching slope to be no flatter than 1:12. 69
a minimum of 50mm clearance around pipe. gully. Grade C light duty cast iron circular cover in a plastic
undertaker's safety policy. to soffit is 1.35 - 1.5m) 79
215mm minimum thickness solid class B Grade C light duty oval cover, sealing ring & rodding Precast concrete chamber sections and cover slab, frame in unadopted areas in accessible to motor
375 to 450 1350 10 engineering brickwork in English bond, or precast 35 49 Precast concrete chamber system comprising
6mm calcium silicate board permanent shuttering eye in 100mm insitu concrete surround set level all to BS 5911: Part 200, to be bedded with mortar, 61 70 Rubber plug. vehicles; in unadopted hard landscaped areas use
11. Boxed arrows indicate minimum invert depth for use 500 to 700 1500 masonry units, with fully filled joints in 1:3 cement 23 chamber wall sections, reducer slabs & shaft wall
each side of wall. with finished ground level. proprietary bitumen or resin mastic sealant. Grade B1 or B2 cast iron circular covers and frames to
when calculating drainage levels. 750 to 900 1800 sections to BS 5911: Part 200.
& sand mortar, flush jointed as work proceeds. BS EN 124, as detailed in the layout & schedules.
T1 ISSUED FOR DRAFT TENDER GED 29.04.14

T2 ISSUED FOR TENDER RJC 16.05.14
T3 SECTION 01 SWALE SECTION CW 16.09.14
ADJUSTED
HARDCORE WELL
COMPACTED IN
150mm LAYERS PROJECT
UNIVERSITY OF BATH
150mmØ PERFORATED
TERRAM GEOTEXTILE LAND DRAIN PIPE
MEMBRANE OR SIMILAR 10 WEST
APPROVED
300mm DEPTH OF
40mm SINGLE SIZE
TITLE
GRAVEL BACKFILL
DRAINAGE
DETAILS
SHEET 2
MANN WILLIAMS
7 OLD KING STREET
QUEEN SQUARE
BATH BA1 2JW
T 01225 464419
SECTION 03 LAND DRAIN F 01225 448651

1:20 502
RCJ PB A1 NTS APRIL 14

STATUS
TENDER
PROJECT DRAWING REV
6505 512 T3

Drainage Rainfall Calcs - GOOD Drawings in Revit - MansWilliams Consulting PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Drainage Rainfall Calcs - GOOD Drawings in Revit - MansWilliams Consulting PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mann Williams Consulting Civil and Structural Engineers

10 West, University of Bath

Planning Conditions 6 & 7

Surface Water Strategy

Surface Water Design

Impermeable area 2314m²

∴ Design has adequate capacity.

FAO Anita Cottrell & Andy Reading

Dear Ms Cottrell and Mr Reading

Geological • Geotechnical • Environmental • Engineering

2. Investigation and Sampling Rationale

3. Risk to Controlled Waters

Geological • Geotechnical • Environmental • Engineering

Recommended Remedial Measures

Geological • Geotechnical • Environmental • Engineering

Copy to: Sarah James, BANES Planning Services

Encl. Proposed Site Plan showing Investigation Strategy & Locations

Geological • Geotechnical • Environmental • Engineering

'Red Line' Trial Pit

existing car park - area

RIBA Chartered Practice www.aww-uk.com

Proposed Site Plan

Scale Sheet Drawn Checked Date

1 : 500 A1 CEJ IJ 17/02/14

1. This drawing is copyright and may not be reproduced

2. All drawings are to be read in conjunction with the

3. Any ambiguities or discrepancies between this drawing

4. All dimensions to be checked on site and any

5. Only figured or calculated dimensions should be used

REV DESCRIPTION BY DATE

P-PRELIMINARY T-TENDER CONSTRUCTION

RJC SCF A1 1:200 SEPT 2014

1. This drawing is copyright and may not be reproduced

2. All drawings are to be read in conjunction with the

3. Any ambiguities or discrepancies between this

4. All dimensions to be checked on site and any

5. Only figured or calculated dimensions should be used

FOR DETAILED ZONE 1

WEST CAR PARK

ER 150Ø IL. 180.620

GL 179.140 + STORM WATER MANHOLE

DRAINAGE DENOTES EXISTING

EXACT DRAINAGE POSITIONS DENOTES EXISTING

22 STORM WATER DRAINAGE

FOUL WATER DRAINAGE

FOUL WATER MANHOLE TO ADOPTABLE

No 48 FOUL WATER PROPRIETARY

STORM WATER MANHOLE TO ADOPTABLE

POLYPROPYLENE INSPECTION CHAMBER

DENOTES AREA TO BE CAREFULLY

EXISTING GL T1 ISSUED FOR DRAFT TENDER RJC 29.04.14

SW P-PRELIMINARY T-TENDER CONSTRUCTION

Telecom data duct (AR) 100(AR)

CONNECTION TO MAIN RUN

RJC CW A1 1 : 500 APR 2014

1. This drawing is copyright and may not be reproduced

A B C D E 2. All drawings are to be read in conjunction with the

FOUL WATER MANHOLE TO ADOPTABLE

P-PRELIMINARY T-TENDER CONSTRUCTION

PROPOSED DRAINAGE LAYOUT

CONSULTING CIVIL AND

7 OLD KING STREET

- SEE DRAWING 6505_501 SWALE