Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SOLUTION GUIDE
How to save steam and improve run time
on a Recovery Boiler
Background
Sootblowers in a recovery boiler consume a significant is impossible to achieve 100% efficiency. A conventional
amount of valuable high-pressure steam. Although nozzle generally has low nozzle efficiency (less than 50%),
paramount to keep the recovery boiler running at so the amount of steam consumed by a conventional
its full capacity without plugging the gas passes, nozzle has to be increased in order to compensate for the
sootblower steam usage can be excessive—and costly. lower nozzle efficiency.
This cost cannot be passed to consumers, requiring
mill engineers to continuously look for opportunities Clyde Bergemann’s CFE III nozzle has pushed the
to reduce costs for improved profitability. envelope with breakthrough nozzle efficiency greater
than 90%. This higher nozzle efficiency means that CFE
While it is impossible to completely eliminate III can generate the same amount of cleaning power
sootblower steam consumption, current technology as its conventional nozzle counterpart at a much lower
advancements have successfully reduced the steam flow rate. Conversely, it also means that CFE III
sootblower steam usage to a level well below 5% can generate more cleaning power than a conventional
of the total boiler steam production. Our experience nozzle at the same steam flow rate.
with the solutions listed in this guide has shown a
sootblower system is able to achieve 2.5% of the
boiler MCR.
2
Sootblowing Costs ($ Million/yr) Sootblowing Costs ($ Million/yr)
4 40
34 kph
3.5 35
25 kph 30
3
25
2.5 $2.0 M/yr 19 kph
16 kph
20
1.5 $1.5 M/yr
15
$1.1 M/yr $1.0 M/yr
1
10
0.5
5
0 0
TM
Before CFE Nozzle SMART Clean Performance
System Upgrade Upgrade Monitoring &
Upgrade Optimization
Use of complete Clyde Bergemann solutions with data from recovery boiler 5.0 Mlb BLDS/day
SMART Clean™ can also identify sootblowers that are 4) Remote Performance Monitoring &
located in non-critical areas, where the deposits can be Optimization:
easily removed with a one-way sootblowing strategy.
One-way-sootblowing uses the full cleaning power of the Clyde Bergemann offers Sootblower Performance
sootblower only during the insertion process. The cleaning Monitoring and Optimization Service for your recovery
power is reduced to a minimum level, which is just enough boilers. Our team of veteran industry professionals has
to keep the lance from overheating during the retraction optimized dozens of systems nationwide and can help
process, further saving valuable sootblowing steam. you:
3
High Pressure Steam = $8/kLb Low Pressure Steam = $4/kLb
Steam Saver Sootblowing
POWER POWER
TURBINE TURBINE
TO MILL TO MILL
150-250
150 - 25-PSIG
PSIG 150-250
150 - 25-PSIG
PSIG
600 - 1,500 PSIG (10 -17 BAR) 600 - 1,500 PSIG (10 -17 BAR)
(41 - 103 BAR) (41 - 103 BAR)
SOOTBLOWING SOOTBLOWING
STEAM STEAM
BOILER BOILER
5) Steam Saver Sootblowing Technology (RSP-H): the mill to direct all high-pressure boiler steam to a steam
turbine generating additional 1-3 MW power, while the
Sootblowers consume a significant amount of extraction steam from the turbine is used for sootblowing.
valuable high pressure steam produced by the boiler.
A tremendous cost-saving alternative is to use lower Four U.S. pulp mills have used Clyde Bergemann Steam
pressure steam from the outlet of the steam turbine at Saver sootblowing technology to generate more MW
150 – 250 psig (10-17) bar. and improve profitability. While initial investment is not
nominal, the payoffs for this technology, even for retrofits,
RSP-H is Clyde Bergemann’s new generation sootblower are extremely significant- more than enough to make the
designed to produce cleaning force equivalent to that of investment worthwhile.
a higher-pressure sootblower. This technology enables
$819K
$800K $756K
$693K
$630K
$400K
$0
$40 $45 $50 $55 $60 $65
Return On Investment based on 350Average Sell Price
days of annual for Greenand
operation Energy (US $/MWhr)
1.5 MWhr additional green energy generation