Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER = 7
INTRODUCTION TO COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD
The column analogy method was proposed by Prof. Hardy Cross and is a powerful
technique to analyze the beams with fixed supports, fixed ended gable frames, closed frames & fixed
arches etc., These members may be of uniform or variable moment of inertia throughout their lengths but
the method is ideally suited to the calculation of the stiffness factor and the carryover factor for the
members having variable moment of inertia. The method is strictly applicable to a maximum of 3rd degree
of indeterminacy. This method is essentially an indirect application of the consistent deformation method.
This method is based on a mathematical similarity (i.e. analogy) between the stresses
developed on a column section subjected to eccentric load and the moments imposed on a member due to
fixity of its supports .*(We have already used an analogy in the form of method of moment and shear in
which it was assumed that parallel chord trusses behave as a deep beam). In the analysis of actual
engineering structures of modern times, so many analogies are used like slab analogy, shell analogy &
girder analogy etc. In all these methods, calculations are not made directly on the actual structure but,
infact it is always assumed that the actual structure has been replaced by its mathematical model and the
calculations are made on the model. The final results are related to the actual structure through same
logical engineering interpretation.
In the method of column analogy, the actual structure is considered under the action of
applied loads and the redundants acting simultaneously. The load on the top of the analogous column is
usually the B.M.D. due to applied loads on simple spans and therefore the reaction to this applied load is
the B.M.D. due to redundants on simple spans.
P1 P2 WKN/m
Ma A
B MB
L
E1=Constt. (d) Loading on top of
(a) Given beam analogous column,
Ms diagram, same as(b).
0 0 1 (Unity)
(b) B.M.D. due to
applied loads, L
plotted on the
compressin side. (e) X-section of analogous
column.
0 0
MB
If we plot (+ve) B.M.D. above the zero line and (-ve) B.M.D below the zero line then we can say
that these diagrams have been plotted on the compression side.
(The conditions from which MA & MB can be determined, when the method of consistent
deformation is used, are). From the Geometry requirements, we know that
(1) the change of slope between points A & B = 0; or sum of area of moment diagrams between
A & B = 0 (note that EI = Constt:), or area of moment diagrams of fig.b = area of moment diagram
of fig..c.
(2) the deviation of point B from tangent at A = 0; or sum of moment of moment diagrams between
A & B about B = 0, or Moment of moment diagram of fig.(b) about B = moment of moment
diagram of fig.(c) about B. above two requirements can be stated as follows.
(1) total load on the top is equal to the total pressure at the bottom and;
(2) moment of load about B is equal to the moment of pressure about B),
indicate that the analogous column is on equilibrium under the action of
applied loads and the redundants.
SIGN CONVENTIONS:-
It is necessary to establish a sign convention regarding the nature of the applied load (Ms -
diagram) and the pressures acting at the base of the analogous column (Mi-diagram.)
Outside
C
Inside
T
Outside
2ND SIGN CONVENTION :-
Upward pressure on bottom of the analogous column ( Mi - diagram) is considered as (+ve).
M = Ms - Mi,
which is (+ve) if it causes compression on the outside.
PROBLEM :- Determine the fixed-ended moments for the beam shown below by the method of column
analogy.
SOLUTION:
W/Unit length.
A B
EI=Constt.
L 2 Ms-diagram
WL
8 (B.M.D. due to applied
loads on B.D.S.)
+
Loading on top of
0 3 0 analogous column.
WL
12 3
WL
12
X-section of
1 analogous column
Mi-diagam
L
Pressure on bottom of
2 analogous column.(uniform as
WL 0
12 resultant falls on the mid point of
2 analogous column section
2 WL
WL WL2 /24 12 2
+
12 0 WL
12
Pressure at the base of the column = P
A
= WL3
12(Lx1)
Mi = WL2
12
(MS)a = 0
Ma = (Ms - Mi)a
= 0 - WL2
12
Ma = - WL2
12
W/unit-length
A B
EI=Constt.
L
3
WL
L/4 6 3/4L
0 0 Ms-diagram
2
WL
2
L/4 L/2
3 yo
WL
6 M X-section of
1
analogous column.
L 3
yo Eccentric load wl /6 acts on centre of
analogous column x-section with an
associated moment as well
A = bh = L x WL2 = WL3
(n+1) 2 (2+1) 6
X = b = L = L
(n+2) (2+2) 4
X = Mxdx
Mdx
2 2
= - W X4 oL = - WL4
2 4 8
X= Mxdx
Mdx
X = - WL4 . 6 = 3 L. (from the origin of moment
8 (-WL3) 4 expression or moment area formula can be used)
A =L1=L
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 319
I yo yo = L 3
12
C = L
2
A e’=M = ( WL3) ( L ) = WL4 ( L/4 is distance between axis yo- yo and the centroid of Ms diagram)
6 4 24
= - 5 WL2
12
(Ms)a = - WL2
2
Ma = (Ms - Mi)a
= - WL2 + 5 WL2
2 12
= - 6 WL2 + 5 WL2
12
Ma = - WL2
12
Mb = (Ms - Mi)b
(Mi)b = P Mc
A I
= - WL3 + WL4 L 12
6L 24 2 L3
= -WL2 + WL2
6 4
= - 2WL2 + 3 WL2
12
= WL2
12
(Ms)b = 0
Mb = (Ms - Mi)b = 0 - WL2 = - WL2
12 12
320 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES
a b
L
Pab
L
+ Ms-diagram
L+b
L+a 3
1 (P ab) P ab
3 xL= 2
2 L
a P ab
2
M
1 x-section of analogous column
L
e = L - (L + a) = 3 L - 2 L - 2a = ( L - 2 a) ( The eccentricity of load w.r.t
2 3 6 6 mid point of analogous column)
I = L2
12
C = L
2
(Mi)a = P Mc
A I
= 2 PabL - 2 Pa2b
2 L2
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 321
= Pab (L - a) a+b=L
L2 b=L-a
= Pab . b
L2
(Mi) = Pab2
L2
(Ms) a = 0
Ma = (Ms - Mi) a
= 0 - Pab2
L2
Ma =- Pab2
L2
The (-ve) sign means that it gives us tension at the top when applied at A.
(Mi)b = P MC
A I
= 2Pa2b
2L2
(Mi)b = Pa2b
L2
(Ms)b = 0
A a b
EI=Constt B
L
1 Pa(a)
2
Pa 2
2 0 Ms-diagram
0
Pa
2
e Pa
2
M
1 x-section of analogous column
L
L/2
e=L - a = ( 3L - 2a )
2 3 6
= -4 Pa2L + 2Pa3
2L2
= -2Pa2L + Pa3
L2
= Pa2 (a - 2L)
L2
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 323
= -Pa2 (2L - a)
L2
(Mi)a = -Pa2 (L + b)
L2
(Ms)a = - Pa
Ma = (Ms - Mi)a
= -Pa + Pa2(L + b)
L2
= - PabL + Pa2 b
L2
= - Pab (L - a)
L2
= - Pab . b
L2
Ma = - Pab2 ( Same result as was obtained with a different BDS)
L2
(Mi)b = P MC
A I
= - Pa2 + Pa2 (3L - 2a)
2L 2L2
= - Pa L + 3Pa L - 2Pa3
2 2
2L2
= 2 Pa L - 2Pa3
2
2L2
= Pa2 L - Pa3
L2
2
= +Pa (L - a )
L2
2
(Mi)b = Pa b
L2
(Ms)b = 0
Mb = (Ms - Mi)b
= 0 - Pa2 b
L2
2
Mb = - Pa b ( Same result as obtained with a different BDS)
L2
324 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES
SOLUTION:-
w/unit length
A B
L/2 L/2
EI = Constt WL3
If B.D.S. is 48 L
a cantilever
8
supported 0 0
at b. -
Ms-diagram = WL x L
2 4
2
WL
WL3
8
48
e=3/8 L
M
1
Analogous col.
L section.
e = L - L = 4L - L = 3L
2 8 8 8
A = L, I = L3 and C = L
12 2
Step !: Apply P= Area Of BMD(Ms diagram ) due to applied loads in a BDS at the center of analogous
column section i.e. at L/2 from either side.
Step 2: The accompanying moment Pe, where e is the eccentricity between mid point of analogous column
section and the point of application of area of Ms diagram, is also applied to at the same point alongwith P.
Step 3: Imagine reactions due to P and M=Pe. Use appropriate signs.
= - 4WL2 + 9WL2
192
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 325
= + 5 WL2
192
Ma = (Ms - Mi)a
= 0 - 5WL2
192
Ma = - 5WL2
192
(Mi)b = P MC ( Additive reactions at B)
A I
= -4 WL2 - 9WL2
192
= - 13 WL2
192
(Ms)b = - WL2
8
Mb = (Ms - Mi)b
SOLUTION:-
W/Unit length
A B
L/2 L/2
bh EI=Constt:
A= n+1 WL
192
3 L
(L)WL 10
= 0 0
192
b
X= Ms-diagram
n+2
L
= 3
2(3+2) WL
192
L 2
X= e (1xWxL) x L (L) = WL
10 M 2 2 3 2 24
1 Analogous column section
L
326 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES
e = L - L = 5L - L = 4L =2 L
2 10 10 10 5
M = ( WL3 ) ( 2 L ) = WL4
192 5 480
(Mi)a = P MC
A I
= - WL2 + WL2
192 80
(Mi)a = 7 WL2
960
(Ms)a = 0
Ma = (Ms - Mi)a
Ma = 0 - 7 WL2 = - 7 WL2
960 960
(Mi)b = P MC
A I
= - WL2 - WL2
192 80
= - 272 WL2
15360
= - 17 WL2
960
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 327
(Ms)b = - WL2
24
Mb = (Ms - Mi) b
= - WL2 + 17 WL2
24 960
= - 40 WL2 + 17 WL2
960
Mb = - 23 WL2
960
Note : After these redundant end moments have been determined, the beam is statically
determinate and reactions , S.F, B.M, rotations and deflections anywhere can be found.
328 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES
PROBLEM:- Determine the fixed - end moments for the beam shown by the method of column analogy
SOLUTION:-
90kn
3kn/m 4m
A B
6m 10m
I=2 I=1
2
3x16 = 96
P2 8
b90
Ms dia. due 3.83m 3kn/m
EI to U.D.L. 45
only. 0a 0
8m 8m 24kn 6m 10m 24kn
P4 P1 90x12x4 M=24x6-3 x (6)2
135 16 2 90kn
Ms dia due = 270 =90kn-m
EI to point 4m 67.5 4m
12m
load only. 67.5kn
yo 16+4
P3 90x4 =22.5kn
3 =6.67m
x 16
M=22.5x6 =135kn-m
1/2 M 1
Analogous
9.15m 6.85m column
x-section.
(a) Ms - diagram has to be divided by a given value of I for various portions of span.
(b) The thickness of the analogous column x - section will also vary with the variation of inertia.
Normally, the width 1/EI can be set equal to unity as was the case in previous problem.
(c) As the dimension of the analogous column x - section also varies in this case, we will have to
locate the centroidal axis of the column and determine the moment of inertia about it.
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 329
Mdx = o6 (24x - 1.5 x2) dx ( Simply supported beam moment due to UDL)
= 1242
= P1 + P 3 - P2 - P4
= 1024 + 2160 - 162 - 202.5
= 2819.5 KN
330 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES
Applied Moment about centroidal axis = M = + 1024 (1.15) + 2160 (0.18) - 162 (5.32) - 202.5 (5.15)
= - 1116 KN-m
The (-ve) sign indicates that the net applied moment is clockwise.
= + 174.34 KN-m
(Ms)a = 0
= - 174.34 KN-m
(Mi)b = 2819.5 + 1116 6.85 ( Note the difference in the values of C for points A and B.)
13 240
= + 248.74 KN-m
(Ms)b = 0
Mb = (Ms - Mi)b
= 0 - 248.74
= - 248.74 KN-m
The -ve sign with Ma & Mb indicate that these cause compression on the inside.
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 331
90kn
3kn/m 4m
A B
2IC IC
3m 6m
3x13
P2 8 =63.4
1 Chosing a 58.5 54 P3
simple beam b d
1.95 2.58
as a.B.D.S. m
m c = 29.25 e Ms dia. due to U.D.L..
EI
a f
6.5 m
P1 90x9x4 =249.23
P5 13
P6
Ms dia. due to pt load.
83 124.62 2.67 EI
2m m
41.5
yo (13+4)
P
175.9kn 4 3 =5.67m
x
877.6kn-m
½ 1 1/2 Analogous column
x-section
6.34m 6.66m
yo
3KN/m
9m 4
m
2
7.6
9 62
.30
7
= 145.12
A = 1 4 + 1 6 + 1 3 = 9.5m2
2 2
Total concentric load on analogous column x – section to be applied at centroidal column axis )
= P1 - P2 - P3 + P4 - P5 - P6
= 1759 KN
= 549.5 (0.16) + 37.125 (4.39) - 62(4.08) + 1624 (0.99) + 62.25 (4.34) - 249.2 (3.99)
= + 877.6 clockwise.
= + 130 KN-m
(Ms)a = 0
(Mi)b = P MC
A I
= + 243 KN-m
(Ms)b = 0
Mb = (Ms - Mi)b
= 0 - 243
Mb = - 243 KN-m
334 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES
Now the beam has become determinate. Let us now solve the same question by choosing another BDS
bh 2.25m 3.25m
A = n+1 b d
0a 0f
13x253.5
= 60.79
3
C
=1098.5 P2= 13.5 126.75
6.75 e121.5
b 13 P4=720 3x 13x13
X' = = Ms/EI diagram due to u.d.l
n+2 4 =3.25 g =253.5
3894KN-m Ps=360KN
1 1/2
6.34m 6.66m
yo
Analogous column section
3KN/m 4m
A B
10m 253.5
3m 39
= - 1292
x = - 1292
- 734
x = + 1.76 m From B
P5 = 1 180 4 = 360 KN
2
= P1 + P2 + P3 - P4 + P5
A = 1 4 + 1 6 + 1 3 = 9.5
2 2
x = 6.66 From B as in previous problem.
(Ms)a = 0
Ma = (Ms - Mi)a
= - 370.83 KN-m
Mb = - 243 KN-m
Now beam is determinate.
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 337
Ma=K a Mb=(COF)Ma
A a B
b EI=Constt:
L
Ma
EI +
0 L/3 2/3L 0
1 Loading on the
MaL
xbLx Ma = 2EI conjugate beam
2 EI
MbL
2/3L 2EI L/3 Reaction on the
0 __ 0 Mb conjugate
EI beam.
aL/2
a a 1 Analogous
EI column
L section.
By choosing a B.D.S. as simple beam under the action of Ma and Mb, we can verify by the use of
conjugate beam method that b = 0. In this case, we are required to find that how much rotation at end A is
required to produce the required moment Ma. In other words, a (which is in terms of Ma and Mb can be
considered as an applied load on the analogous column section). The moments computed by using the
formula P/A MC/I will give us the end moments directly because in this case Ms diagram will be
zero.
I = 1 L3 = L3
EI 12 12EI
Downward load on analogous column = a at A.
Ma = P + MC
A I
= a EI + 3a EI
L L
Ma = 4 EI a
L
Where 4EI = Ka
L
= a EI - 3a EI
L L
= - 2a EI
L
= - 2EI . a
L
The (-ve) sign with Mb indicates that it is a (-ve) moment which gives us tension at the top or
compression at the bottom.
EXAMPLE:- Determine the stiffness factors at A & at B and the carry-over factors from A to B and
from B to A for the straight members with variable x-sections shown in the figure below..
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 339
SOLUTION:-
A B
2I I 2I
4m 6m 6m
1 1 1 1 rad
A= x6+ x6+ x4
2EI EI 2EI
1 rad 7.73
= 3 + 6 + 2
EI EI EI B
11 1 A 1 1
Analogous column section
= EI 2EI EI 2EI
7.73m 8.27m
x = (0.5 6) 3 + (6 1) 9 + (4 0.5) 14
11
x = 8.27
Ma = P MC
A I
= P + MC = 1 EI + 7.73 7.73 EI
A I 11 181.85
Ma = 0.419 EI = 0.419 16 EI
L
Ma = 6.71 EI
L
Ka = 6.71
Mb = EI - 7.73 8.27 EI x 16
11 181.85 L
= - 4.17 EI
L
(COF)AB = Mb = 4.17 = 0.62
Ma 6.71
1rad
1rad
8.27
7.73 8.27
Mb = 7.47 EI
L
Kb = 7.47
(COF)ba = 0.56
SOLUTION:-
B C
12KN 5I
6m 2I 2I 6m
A D
10m
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 341
The term “axis of symmetry” implies that the shown frame is geometrically symmetrical (M.O.I. is
symmetrical) w.r.t. one axis as shown in the diagram. The term does not include the loading symmetry (
the loading can be and is unsymmetrical).
6m 6m
A D
72 kN-m
10m
Ms-diagram
B 5I C
12 kN-m
6m 2I
6m 2I
Force= 108
2 - EI
36 D
A EI
Ms - Diagram
EI
According to our sign convention for column analogy, the loading arising out of negative Ms /EI will act
upwards on the analogous column section.
y
B C 1
5
y=2.27m 5m 5m
Mxx
x x
3.73m 108
EI Myy
2m
D
A
1 y 1/2
2
342 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES
A = (1 6) 2 + 1 10 = 8
2 5 EI
y = (1/5 10) 1/10 + 2 [ 1/2 6] 3 = 2.27 about line BC.
8
= 31.51
EI
POINT Ms P/A Mx y My x Mi M
Ix Iy
A - 72 - 13.5 - 22.14 - 16.17 - 51.81 - 20.19
B 0 - 13.5 + 13.47 - 16.17 - 16.20 + 16.20
C 0 - 13.5 + 13.47 + 16.17 + 16.14 - 16.14
D 0 - 13.5 - 22.14 + 16.17 - 19.47 + 19.47
Note : Imagine the direction of reaction due to P, Mx and My at various points. Use appropriate signs.
PROBLEM:- Analyze the quadrangular frame shown by the method of column analogy.
B 3KN/m
C
5I
6m 2I 2I 6m
A D
10m
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 343
B C
150K n-m
A D
15
B.D.S under loads
Draw Ms-diagram by parts and then superimpose
150
15 B C C
B 150
150
A
30 150
D
150
15
3KN/m
150
B C
-
150
A 150 D
Ms-Diagram
344 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES
100
2.5
B 75 C
-
30
450
Ms - Diagram
6m
EI
3m I
75
A D
10m
100 y
2.25m
C
B
450 1/5
2.275m Mx
X X
6m 0.725m
My
3.725
3m
D
1/2 1/2
10m
Analogus colmun section
y
A = 2 [ 1/2 6] + 1 10 = 8
5 EI
y = (1/5 10) 1/10 + 2[(6 1/2) 3] = 2.275 about line BC
8
Ix = 2 [ 1/2 63 + (1/2 6) (0.725)2] + [ 10 (1/5)3 + (10 1 ) (2.275)2]
12 12 5
= 31.51
EI
POINT Ms P/A Mx y My x Mi M
Ix Iy
A - 150 - 68.75 - 11.32 - 75.69 - 155.76 5.76
B - 150 -68.75 + 6.91 - 75.69 - 137.53 -12.47
C 0 -68.75 + 6.91 + 75.69 13.85 -13.85
D 0 -68.75 -11.32 + 75.69 -4.38 4.38
Example.4 :- Determine stiffness factors corresponding to each end and carry-over factors in both
direction of the following beam.
SOLUTION:-
5
I 2
I 4
I I 3
I
2
m 1
.
5mm1
2 m 2
m
yo
4.74m 3.76m
yo
A = 1 2 + 1 1.5 + 1 2 + 1 1 + 1 2
5 2 4 3
A = 3.32
EI
= 19.53
EI
1 rad
A 8.5m B
A 4.74 B
4.74 3.76
Ka = 12.33
Mb = EI - 4.74 3.26 EI
3.32 19.53
Mb = - 5.19 EI
L
(COF)a b = 0.42
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 347
Ma = P Mc
A I
1 rad
A 8.5m B
A 3.76 B
4.74 3.76
EI 3.76 x 4.74 x EI
Ma = -
3.32 19.53
= -0.61EI
EI
= - 0.61 x 8.5 x = -5.19 EI/L
L
Mb = P Mc
A I
= EI + 3.76 3.76 EI
3.32 19.53
Kb = 8.76
(COF) b a = 0.6
348 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES
SOLUTION :-
3 kN/m
B C D 3m
3I 3I
7m
I I
A E
14 m
3kN/m
C
7.62
B D
7 7 3 .5 7 3 .5
C
B 7 .6 2 D
A E
21 21 A E
B.D.S under loads M s -d iag ra m
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 349
2.
24.5 24.5
86
a =
C
x
4.7
B 2 .8 6
6
6
D
4 .7
4.375
A M s diagram E
EI
Taking the B.D.S. as a simply supported beam.
Mx = 21X – 1.5X2
Mx = Mc at x = 7m
Mc = 21 x 7 – 1.5 x 72
= 73.5 KN-m
Sin = 3 = 0.394
7.62
Cos = 7 = 0.919
7.62
P1 = P2 = 2/3 24.5 7.62 = 124.46
P = P1 + P2 = 248.92
Mx dx = o7 (21 X - 1.5X2) dx = 21X2 - 1.5 X3 o7 = 343
2 3
7 x 73 - 1.5 x 74 = 1500.625
4
X = (Mx) X dx = 1500.625
Mx dx 343
Cos = 4.375
a
a = 4.375 = 4.375
Cos 0.919
a = 4.76
350 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES
124.46
124.46
2.8
3m 6
B 4.7
6
C
2.17
D
x 1/3
x
Mx
4.83
A
E
1
1
Y = 4.83 from A or E
Ix = 2 [ 1 73 + (1 7) (4.83 - 3.5)2 ]
12
Iy 770
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 351
Mx = 2 [124.46 4.05 ]
Mx = 1007 (clockwise).
My = 0
Applying the general formulae in a tabular form.
Ma = ( Ms- Mi)a
( Mi)a= P/A Mx y/Ix My x/Iy)
10kN
B C
3I
2kN/m 4m
2I 2I
A D
3m
10 kN
2kN/m
8
31 B.D.S
10
A
8
31 31 D
10
10
15
15
31
M s-diagram
COLUMN ANALOGY METHOD 353
A = (1 4 ) 2 + ( 1 3) = 5
2 3
(3 1 ) ( 1 ) + 2 [ ( 1 4 ) 2 ]
Y = 3 6 2 .
5
Y = 1.63 From line BC
Ix = 3 (1/3)3 + (1/3 3) (1.63)2 +2[0.5 43 (0.5 4) (0.37)2]
12 12
= 8.55
Iy = (1/3) (3)3 + 2 [ 4 0.53 ( 4 0.5) (1.5)2]
12
= 9.83
1
0kN
3
kN/m
3
I 1
.5
I I
M
s
-
di
ag
ra
m
6 d
u
et
ou
.d
.
l
onl
y
2
4
7
2
354 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES
4
0
P4=80
1.33
40
yo
Analogous
1/3 1/1.5 1 column
section
4.78 3.22
yo
4
X = - 6 = 1.5m from A
-4
= - 284 KN (upward)
A= 1 2+ 1 2+14=6
3 1.5
X = (1 4) 2 + (2 1/1.5) 5 + (1/3 2 ) 7
6
= 3.22
= 25.70
= - 426.79 (counterclockwise).
(Mi)a = P Mc
A I
= + 32.05
(Ms)a = 0
Ma = - 32.05 KN-m
356 THEORY OF INDETERMINATE STRUCTURES
(Mi)b = P - Mc
A I
= - 100.81
(Ms)b = - 72 - 40 = - 112
Mb = (Ms - Mi)b
= - 112 + 100.81
Mb = - 11.19 KN-m