Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Manish Selliah
20731825
Section: 008
Introduction
Calorimetry is one of the greatest processes in science, it is the process of heat transfer, and the
piece of equipment that is used for this study is called a calorimeter (Gaisford, 2016). To attain
the heat transfer values within a reaction, substances are put inside of the calorimeter to allow for
the reaction to occur and the change in temperature should be observed allowing for the
calculation of heat transfer for the specific reaction to exist. To determine the heat transfer, q, of
this experiment, the equation, q=ms∆T is used. In addition to the change in temperature, one
must know the mass of the substance and also the specific heat of the substance. Specific heat is
a unique value given to every substance and is the measure of the amount of heat per unit mass
required to raise the temperature of the substance by one-degree Celsius (Gaisford, 2016). In
addition to the heat transfer equation, the equation qsystem=0 is used. This equation represents
the heat transfer within the system and the fact that it will add up to 0. Meaning, all the heat
produced by the reaction being studied will be either absorbed by the water or by the water and
calorimeter combined. The calorimeter specifically used for this experiment is made out of
Styrofoam. Styrofoam is a good insulation material but it has the inability to isolate the system
from its surroundings completely. Due to this, the pressure of the calorimeter inside is equal to
the barometric pressure on the outside of the calorimeter. Since there is an equal pressure
between the system and its surroundings, it is determined that the heat of the reaction is the same
as its enthalpy change, ∆H=qreaction (Gaisford, 2016). This equation will then allow for the
Table #2: Temperature Change of Water when combined with NaOH in a Calorimeter
Time Elapsed since Temperature of Time Elapsed (m) Temperature of
reaction began (m) Water (ºC) Water (ºC)
2 23 13 28.3
3 26.2 14 28.2
4 28 15 28.1
5 29 16 27.9
6 29 17 27.9
7 29.3 18 27.8
8 29.5 19 27.8
9 28.5 20 27.8
10 28.8 21 27.6
11 28.8 22 27.5
12 28.5 23 27.4
Results Part B:
Table #3: Temperature Change of Heated Water prior to mixing with Cool Water
Time Elapsed since Temperature of Time Elapsed (m) Temperature of
reaction began (m) Water (ºC) Water (ºC)
-6 50 -3 49.8
-5 50 -2 49
-4 50 -149.8 48
Tf = 30 °C
30
29
28
27
26
Temperature (°C)
25
24
23
22
21
20
Ti = 19.5 °C ΔT:
10.5 °C
19 Time (s)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
PART A:
ΔHsoln = qrxn / n
ΔHsoln = 10,983 J / 0.2518 mol
ΔHsoln = 43,617.95 J/mol
ΔHsoln = qrxn / n
ΔHsoln = 13,332.69 J / 0.2518 mol
ΔHsoln = 54,593.31 J/mol
Temperature of Water before and after the addition of Cold
Water
52
50
Ti heated water: 50 °C
48
46
44
42
Temperature (ºC)
40
38
34
32
28
26
ΔT cool water: 8.99 °C
Ti cool water: 20.01 °C
24
-8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Time (m)
PART B:
18
17.8
17.6
17.4
ΔT = 4 ºC Tf: 19 °C
17.2
17
16.8
16.6
16.4
16.2
16
15.8
15.6
15.4 Ti =15 °C
15.2
15
14.8
14.6
14.4
14.2
14
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650
Time (s)
Calculating the Molar Concentration of NaOH:
Discussion
The results aquired for the molar enthalpy of NaOH, incorporating the heat lost to the calorimeter,
it was quite close to the expected result of – 44.51 kJ/mol (Petrucci, 2011). This emphasizes the
fact that the heat lost to the calorimeter must be added into calculations to make sure that the most
accurate results occur. Some assumptions that were made in this experiment was that the solutions
in Part C were very similar to water, proving that 1 mL of each solution was equal to 1 g. The
evidence of this assumption is strong since the theoretical density of 1.0M NaOH is 1.0411 g/mL
which is close enough to make this assumption true (Petrucci, 2011). The same assumption is
valid for HCl which has a theoretical density of 1.0 – 1.1 g/mL which is close enough to make this
assumption true(Petrucci, 2011). The calorimeter used in this experiment allowed for the reactions
to occur, but an observation during the experiment, it usually leaks, so this may have led to a
decrease in accuracy of the results obtained. Methods of aquring accurate results for the
measurements of the mass of the calorimeter and contents may have also caused the decrease in
the accuracy of results as the top loading balances were used and those did not give as accurate of
a mass as an analytical balance could have given. This would have affected the final masses and
inevitably changing the calorimetric calculations done. The method used to calculate the
concentration of the NaOH using the mass of the NaOH and volume of water gave a result closest
to the approximate concentration from in the lab book, 1.008M vs 1.00M, compared to the method
using the calorimetric data to calculate the concentration which gave a result that was lower than
then expected, 0.92M vs 1.00M. This may be due to the fact that the first result was a theoretical
calculation whereas the other two were experimental calculations where error can be present and
Conclusion
The purpose of this experiment was to determine the molar concentration of NaOH using a
obtaining the molar enthalpy of NaOH, using the calorimetric constant to ensure the heat lost to
the calorimeter, and taking the heat released by NaOH in the neutralization reaction and dividing
it by the the theoretical kJ/mol figure of H O to determine the molar concentration of NaOH. These
2
objectives were all achieved, the findings being 43,617.95 J/mol for the molar enthalpy of NaOH
without heat lost to the calorimeter, 54,593.31 J/mol for the molar enthalpy with heat lost to the
calorimeter, 0.063 kJ/ºC for the calorimeter constant, 2.856 J ºC g for the specific heat of the
-1
calorimeter, 1.008 mol/L for the molar concentration of NaOH using mass of NaOH and volume
of water, 0.748 mol/L for the molar concentration of NaOH using calorimetric calculations without
heat lost to the calorimeter, and 0.9204 mol/L for the molar concentration of NaOH using
calorimetric calculations with heat lost to the calorimeter. The molar concentrations of NaOH
calculated and are not as close to the expected molar concentration as would’ve been wanted,
Petrucci, R. et al., General Chemistry: Principles and Modern Applications, 10th ed. ; Pearson
Canada Inc., Ontario, 2011.