Professional Documents
Culture Documents
by H. Lubanska
A comparison has been made between the atomiza- represent the atomizing gas. In order that the results
ti on characteristics of severaL Liquid metaLs, gas- derived from such investigations may be applied
atomized by spray rings of various design. An ap- generally to metallurgical problems, some correlation
proximate correlating equation is deduced for the of the atomization of different metals is required. In
particle mass median diameter, based on the avail- the present report a preliminary attempt is made to
able data from iron atomization triaLs and model correlate the limited information to hand.
experiments using tin and low melting point alloys.
RELATED LITERATURE AND THEORY
NOMENCLATURE A great deal of research has been concerned with
A-mass flow rate of gas the atomization of aqueous fluids and oils (Fraser,
D-diameter of liquid stream 1956 and Gretzinger, 1961) .1,2 Several empirie al
M-mass flow rate of liquid (metal) formulae have been derived for specific types of gas
V-velocity of gas at impact with liquid stream atomizers. Very little, however, is to be found on the
Xm-mass median particle diameter or geometrie subject of liquids with physical properties differing
me an diameter to any great extent from those of water. The influence
p-density of liquid of the surface tension and density of liquid metals has
y-surface tension of liquids been hardly explored. Wetzel (1951)" carried out a
(Tg-geometric standard deviation limited investigation on molten wax and a metal
V 2D alloy of low melting point in the case of a venturi
W- p - - , the Weber number atomizer. He did not succeed in obtaining a correlat-
y
vm , Vg , Kinematic viscosity of liquid, gas respectively. ing formula for the two liquids.
Nukiyama (1938)' derived an equation for a specific
INTRODUCTION design of converging pneumatic atomizer. The equa-
The drop-size distribution of atomized liquids is of tion is widely quoted and contains the fluid properties
interest in many fields. Much research has been car- mentioned above and a viscosity term, hut is only
ried out on various atomizer designs for spraying claimed to hold within the range of the physical prop-
aqueous liquids, fuels and paints. However, only com- er ti es of oils and aqueous liquids. The mass mean
paratively recently has there been an interest in the particle diameter, d, in micrometers is given by
atomization of molten met als in connection with the
production of metal powders in particular. For reasons
d = --
585 -. /'i
V - + 597
[ -/k ]0.4" ( 1000 Qr. )'-"
related to control and production efficiency in this V p Y QA
field of powder metallurgy, a knowledge of particle
size distribution is of importance. The factors govern- where V = relative velocity in rn/sec of gas to liquid
ing the mean particle size of the atomized metals and, stream
in particular, the deviation ab out this mean are then
y = surface tension of liquid, dynes/cm
of special concern.
p = density of liquid, gm/ce
In the course of research on the gas-atomization of
/L = viscosity of liquid, poise
molten met al streams, model work is being carried
Qc., QA = volume flow rates of liquid, air respectively.
out using low-melting point metal alloys and tin to
simulate the metal stream, with compressed air to
It may be noted that for ratios of QA/QL ): 5000, the
second term of the righthand side of the equation
H. LUBANSKA is associated with The Inter-Group Laboratories of the
contributes little to the predicted drop-size in the case
British Steel Corporation, London, England.
of inviscid fluids. This relationship has not been found
various pressures, the metal droplets falling into to constitute the governing parameter. V is the rela-
water to eomplete their solidifieation and prevent
agglomeration. The dried atomized particles were • Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1929, p. 341.
--"
---:::''0... .....
~ CPAtin
<1'
H 100
Probobillty
" ",
" 9999
100 .--~~~~~----------~~~~~~~~~~-------~---,
.
Annulor type otomisers from literature
OAluminium'o OCopper 'OWox 7
(1 + MA )
Iran
J.
lI.l.
~,
Model tests.
l: ~~t~~cai~~~,
Tin
dimensionless group, the correlation
serie!> W Vg
10 4 Annular type atomlsers fram literature
OAluminium lo 0 Copper 9 OWax 7 was evidently improved (Fig. 5). W is a Weber num-
ber, in which V has been taken as the gas jet velocity
x at the impact point, D the stream diameter, p the
X X liquid density, y the liquid surface tension. The
X kinematic viscosity ratio, vrnlv., of the liquid to the
Wigg line
1>200 N atomizing gas, was used to preserve the non-dimen-
sional form, and V g , the value of the gas viscosity at
N.T.P. is, in fact, a constant and does not contribute
to the correlation.
/
Iran single
test 1966 $ n=8
initially against W, and some correlation was immedi-
ately apparent. However, improved correlation was
Iran powder
(".d:. St"l) n.4
l
triols Iran
Model ttsh
A Tin
obtained when account was taken of the mass flow
•
.. Meta! alloy
Tin factorial series
ratio, total liquid to gas flow, MI A, and the kinematic
100 Annulor type atomisers fram literature x viscosity of the metal vrn.
<> Aluminlum10 0 Copper9 0 "'ex' The data for the iron tests were finally plotted with
all appropriate model spray data in the dimensionless
Line equation form, xrn/D versus rP where
I m iD-50 [(I+~)~w]>
X
x...ID = K [ --
lJ", (
1 + -M ) ] "2
v, W A
oÜIOL.O-1-...L-----L----L-L.L.l..O.l...I.JOI--..l..--.l..-.l..-Ll....l...I.JO.J..I--.l.---L--L.J...Ju.J-UI.O where K is a constant to be determined for particular
Im/O
conditions of spray ring and liquid stream. The value
Fig. 5-Correlation of atomization data for liquid metals. of K is seen to vary between ab out 40 and 50 for the
c
Tin Alloy
Copper 1083 2300 8.3 1150 4.2 0.5
( approx range)
Wax 40 370 0.83 23 40-20 ange
40-20 )
(Clare's material)
• The iron va lues are estimated for the pig iron used for the pilot plant trials, C - 4.2, Si _ 1.25, S = 0.012, P = 0.132, Mm 1.15. Refer-
ences for iron properties. P. Kozakevitch and G. Urbain, Rev. Met. 1963, 60 (Surface Tension).
H. Schenk et al. BISI 3248 "Measurements of the Viscosity of Molten Metals at High Temperatures"
Units (1) ImN/m = 1 dyne/cm
(2) lrnNs/m' = 1 centipoise
(3) Imm2 /s = 1 centistoke