Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

#855
COMPLETE
Collector: Web Link 1 (Web Link)
Started: Friday, March 15, 2019 9:16:51 AM
Last Modified: Friday, March 15, 2019 9:34:12 AM
Time Spent: 00:17:21
IP Address: 173.50.93.45

Page 1: Placement Information

Q1 Student Teacher's Name

Micayla Chapmen

Q2 Student Teacher's Endorsement Area Secondary Education,

English

Q3 Grade Taught Middle School

Q4 Internship Start Date (MM/DD/YYYY)

01/14/2-19

Q5 Internship End Date (MM/DD/YYYY)

03/08/2019

Q6 School of Student Teaching Placement

Independence Middle School

Q7 School Division Virginia Beach City Public Schools

Q8 Evaluator's Name (First Last)

Sandra Cox

Q9 Evaluator's Email. We will return a PDF copy of your report to this address.

Email Address: sccox@regent.edu

1/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q10 Evaluator's Position/Role University Supervisor

Q11 What time period is this evaluation for? Final

Page 2: Standard One: Professional Knowledge

Q12 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Demonstrates accurate knowledge and skills of the subject area(s) Superior

taught.
Demonstrates an understanding of the development of the age Proficient
group.
Integrates key content elements and facilitates students’ use of Superior
higher level thinking skills.
Links content with other subject areas and real world applications. Proficient

Q13 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall performance in the area of professional knowledge.

Ms. Chapman demonstrates strong English content knowledge

Page 3: Standard Two: Instructional Planning

Q14 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Aligns lesson objectives to the school’s curriculum and student Exemplary

learning needs.
Develops appropriate plans designed to meet all learner needs; Superior
adapts plans as needed.
Plans time realistically for pacing, content mastery, and Proficient
transitions.
Plans for differentiated instruction. Proficient

Q15 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional planning.

Written plans are excellent aligned well with the district curriculum. Pacing, transitions, and differentiation are on-target, and growing
with each week.

Page 4: Standard Three: Instructional Delivery

2/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Q16 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Engages and maintains students in active learning. Superior

Differentiates instruction to meet the students’ needs. Proficient
Reinforces learning goals consistently throughout lessons. Exemplary
Uses a variety of effective instructional strategies and resources. Exemplary
Uses instructional technology to enhance student learning. Proficient

Q17 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness of instructional delivery.

Instructional delivery is on-target with student engagement and using a variety of learning tools and strategies as strengths.

Page 5: Standard Four: Assessment of and for Student Learning

Q18 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Uses student learning data to make instructional decisions. Superior

Uses a variety of appropriate assessment strategies and Superior
instruments
Uses assessment tools for both formative and summative Superior
purposes.
Gives constructive and frequent student feedback. Exemplary

Q19 Please comment on the teacher candidate's performance in the area of assessment of and for student learning.

Responses to students, both informal and formal measures, are well thought through.

Page 6: Standard Five: Learning Environment

Q20 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Establishes clear expectations for classroom rules and Proficient

procedures; enforces them consistently and fairly.
Uses available resources and knowledge of students to prevent, Proficient
redirect, or reinforce behaviors.
Respects students’ diversity, including language, culture, race, Superior
gender, and special needs.
Actively listens and pays attention to students’ needs and Superior
responses.

Q21 Please comment on the teacher candidate's overall effectiveness in creating an environment conducive to
learning.

Ms. Chapman has grown in this area since the beginning of student teaching. She is consistent, fair, and calm in her responses while
managing student behavior.

3/4
 Regent University CAS Student Teacher Evaluation SurveyMonkey

Page 7: Standard Six: Professionalism

Q22 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Modifies performance based on personal and professional Superior

critiques.
Demonstrates initiative in planning, management, and Exemplary
professional interactions.
Demonstrates effective communication and collaboration with Exemplary
teachers and other school personnel.
Fosters trust in all school relationships through fair and ethical Exemplary
interactions.

Q23 Please comment on the teacher candidate's professionalism throughout the period of observation.

Ms. Chapman integrated herself full in the grade level's planning and collaboration.

Page 8: Standard Seven: Student Academic Progress

Q24 Using the following scale, please rate the teacher candidate's performance in each of the areas below.

Documents the progress of each student throughout the Exemplary

placement.
Provides evidence that achievement goals have been met. Superior
Uses available data to document/communicate student progress Superior
and develop learning targets.

Q25 Please comment on the students academic progress throughout the period of observation.

Ms. Chapman revises instruction based on the most current student performance data.

4/4