Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SCIENCE INSTRUCTION
those things that they can observe, touch, and experience. I challenge students to “think like
scientists” as they study relevant phenomena, building a deeper understanding of science through
constructivist learning principles where students build their knowledge through experience and
problem solving (Powell & Kalina, 2009). Through direct experience, students practice inquiry
skills and are challenged to seek deeper understanding of science content through investigation
The project “Mock Rocks” illustrates the inquiry model and constructivist learning
this project, students explore the scientific concepts of mineral analysis through separation,
dissolving, and evaporation. Students are building upon both direct instruction of science
concepts as well as their prior learnings from this ongoing unit. They are using new tools to
gather information, and are challenged to use evidence from the activity to support their findings.
Students are directed to take time to pause and ask questions in an effort to think more deeply
about what they are doing, and more importantly, why they are doing it.
To support my students learning through the inquiry model, lessons are prepared in such
a way that students have clear direction, appropriate scaffolding, and engaging content. District,
State, and National Standards for Science Education provide the framework from which I base
my science instruction. I lean heavily on concepts presented in the Next Generation Science
Standards, with an intent to build a science experience that resembles the way scientists work
and think (NGSS, 2013). Lessons in my classroom utilize a combination of direct instruction in
ERICKSON MASTERS PORTFOLIO 2
science coupled with guided inquiry, which allows students to explore new thinking while also
providing them with scaffolding and guidance on what they are looking for. To achieve this, I
build lessons upon a framework that uses the 5E Model of Instruction: Engage (ask questions),
Explore (investigate), Explain (use and apply information), Elaborate (Look at information in a
new way), and Evaluate (Share results). This learning cycle approach emphasizes the
conclusions (Duran, 2004). Through this learning cycle approach, students are challenged to
integrate inquiry, critical thinking, and cooperative learning methods to build an understanding
of science concepts.
opportunities for problem solving, social interaction, and use of language. Combined, these
factors are important contributors to the learning process (Vygotsky, 1978). In cooperative
learning experiences, students benefit from tasks that are designed to practice problem solving,
Ashman, 1998). Collaboration in science lessons supports the objective of working “like a
scientist”, where findings and results are shared, reviewed, and enhanced within a wider
community.
In conclusion, my science classroom is designed to inspire students to think and act like
scientists as they learn new concepts. My goal is to support students in deepening their
understanding of science concepts, but also to develop skills that support inquiry,
REFERENCES
Banchi, H., Bell, R., (2008). The Many Levels of Inquiry.. Science and Children, 46 (2), 26-29
Duran, L., Duran, H., The 5E Instructional Model:. A Learning Cycle Approach for Inquiry-
Gilles R., Ashman, A., (1998) Behavior and interactions of children in cooperative groups in
lower and middle elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology ,90 (4), 746-
757.
NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States.
Powell, Katherine C., Kalina, Cody J. (2009) Cognitive and Social Constructivism: Developing
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes.