Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com -
Transactions of
Nonferrous Metals
Society of China
Science Trans. Nonfcrrous Met. Soc. China I7(2007) 600-605
Press wwLv.csu.edu.ctiiysxbi
Abstract: The deflection of rolls of Sendziinir mill with double AS-U-Roll was simulated by finite element niethod(FEM). The
intlucticcs of rolling pressure, strip width and rolls-assignment on rolls deflection were analyzed. The results show that thc work roll
dctlectioii increases with the increase of rolling pressure and the reduction ofwork roll radius, but the rigid displacemcnt of work roll
slightly changes; the work roll end might appear negative displacement for the narrow strip width and high rolling prcssure that
might ':;Lux the contact of work rolls. The research results are significant for guiding production and theoretical analysis of the rolls
system of Scndzimir mill.
Kei words: roll deflection; Sendzimir mill; tinitc element method; double AS-U-roll
LAD *
AS-U LBC
roll
!LA
Fig.2 Simplified model of backup roll
LI )
-~
. - Schemt. 1
- Schelnc 2
'- Scheme I
- Scheme 2
A - \theme 3 A - Scheme 3
I
0 200 400 600 xoo I 000 1 200 I 401
Barrel length ol'roll Olinin
0.22
0.20
E
.g
d
0.1x
c
E
"J
0.16
n
0
0.14
.- Schen1c I
- Schelne 2
6
0.I2
A - Scheme 3 0.10
0.08 i
' - 0 200 400 600 x00 I 000 I 200 I 400 0 200 400 600 xoo I 000 I 200 1 40
Barrel length o f roll I/mm Barrel length of' roll J/mm
c.
r:
5-
- Scheme 2
E
2.5
2.0 -
Y A A
'- Schcme
A - Schcme 3
I
- Schc111c 2
2 4- 1
3
fl
IJ 5 1.5-
EC J 3 - f?d
c: 0
--
0
2 1.0-
..-
E-2- .-9
n n
0.5 -
I-
0- 0-
- 8 d I
Y U Hai-liang, et aliTrans. Nonferrous Met. SOC.China 17(2007) 603
mtn for scheme 2, 0.57 inm and 0.77 m m for scheme mm, the rigid displacement and deflection of roll S
3. From Fig.4(b), the rigid displacement of roll 0 is decrease. However, when +he strip width reduces from
0.41 min and the maximum deflection o f roll 0 is 0.44 987 to 8.53 mm, the displacement of cnd of roll S
mm for scheme 1 ; similarly, 0.38 m m and 0.43 tnm becomes negative. Meanwhile, thc maximum of roll
for scheme 2, 0.30 mm and 0.33 mm for scheme 3. It deflection increases, which also appears in rolls 0 and I.
can be found that the roll deflection increases and the From Figs.S(e) and (f), the deflection of parts 2-4 of
rigid dislocation changes slightly with the increase of rolls A and B changes little, but that of the parts 1 and 6
rolling force. From Figs.4(c) and (d), it can be found that changes obviously.
the maximum deflection of roll J is smaller than that of Fig.6 shows the rolls deflection under variable
roll I. Similarly, the maximum roll deflection of roll B is rolls-assignment. From Fig.6(a), the maximum of roll S
smaller than that of roll A. deflection increases with the reduction of roll radius, and
Fig5 shows the rolls deflection under various strip it increascs with the reduction of the radius of 1st IMR
widths. When the strip width reduces from 1 121 to 987 when the work roll radii are equal. From Fig.6(b), the
- 0.7
-
r
-
r
2 0.5
P
. - Scl1cmc I
2
d
-P
*
'- Scheme I
j
.- 0 - f
A
- Scheme 4
- Sc11eme 5 t .z 0.3-
c A
- Scllclllc 4
- Schcmc. 5
-0.4
-0.81 ,J
f 'il
, L - 1
0 200 400 600 so0 1 000 I 200 I 100 0 2 0 0 400 000 so0 1 000 I 100 1 400
t3arrc.l length of roll S ' m m Ha1.rel length 01'r011 O/mn1
- Schelne 1 1 - Schcme I
- Schcme 4
- Schen1e 4 A - Schcmc 5
- Schemt. 5
0.05 1 I L _
J 0.02 t , , , 1 L
0 200 400 600 800 I 000 1 100 1 100 0 200 400 600 so0 I 000 I 200 1 41 L
u,'illel
.. length o F r o l l I/mm B a r r e l length ol'roll .l/mm
1 - Schcme I
- Schcme 4 - Scheme 4
A- Scheme 5 .-5 chcme 5
1
5-
-I
c
> 4-
5
3-
-m
.-$ 2 -
n
I-
0 ~
I I
604
1.8
E 1.4
-E
1
c
w
E
-
:1.0
.-2
a
0.6
0.2 L' I I ,
0 200 400 600 800 1 000 1 200 I 300 0 200 400 600 800 I 000 I 200 I 400
Barrel length of roll Simm Barrel Icngth o f roll Oinini
0.30- (
0.22 -
0.20 ~
0.18-
0.16-
0.14-
0.12-
0.101 1
roll deflection increases as the 1st IMR radius reduces. rolling processes. It will provide suitable theoretical
From Figs.6(e) and ( f ) , the rolls have the same radius, guide for adjusting AS-U-rolls to analyze the rolls
but they have different roll deflections. The main reason deflection without the change of AS-U racks position.
is the change of acting force of rolls system. During rolling processes, there are many influence
The roll deflection and the rigid displacement of factors of roll deflection, e.g. physical dimensions and
work roll are important influence factors of strip exit material attribution of rolls and strip, rolling schedules,
profile, which are affected by the 1st IMR, 2nd IMR and tensions, etc. It is undoubted that the rolling pressure, the
backup roll radii, the acting force distribution in 20-high strip width and the rolls-assignment are the most
Sendzimir mill, the position of AS-U racks and the important factors.
profile of roll J, etc. The AS-U racks position and the There are many influencing factors of rolling force,
profile of roll J are used to control the strip shape during e.g. rolling schedule, tension, work roll radius, friction
Y U Hai-liang, et aliTrans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 17(2007) 605
and material attribution etc. From the above results, the changes little.
rolls deflection reduces with decreasing rolling force. 3) The work roll end might appear negative
When rolling the same physical dimension strip with displacement for narrow strip width and high rolling
different material attributions, the strip with low pressure, which should be avoided for reducing the wear
dcfortnation resistance should reduce the bend of work roll end.
deformation of backup roll by adjusting AS-U-rolls.
The strips with different widths are rolled for References
variablc users. In this paper, the rolls deflection was
analyzcd with three kinds of strip widths. From the KIM J T, YI J J, HAN S Y. Shape control of alloy atcel rolled by
Sendziinir mill [J]. KSMt Journal. 1996. lO(3): 277-2x5.
results, the rigid displacement of the end of work roll is ASANO K. TAKAHASHI H. MIYA'IA 'I.. KOIIIRO Y. Stabilization
not a positive value but a negative value when the strip o f tension control iii reverse rolling mills using statc feedback [J].
width i s narrow and the rolling force is big. Under this Tetsu To Hagane. 2004. 90( 1 I ) : 95X-963. ( i n Japanese)
RINGWOOD J V. Shape control systems for Scndmnir steel mills [J].
condition. the main reason is that the roll flattening along
IEEE Transactions o n C'ontrol Systems Technology. 2000, X( I ):
barrel length direction is not symmetrical. When the strip 70-86
width is narrow, the roll flattening in the roll middle part RAY A, MUKHERJEE I). SARKAR t3. MISHRA S. Influence of
is big and that in other parts are small, and the barrel iiiicro~trueture on the premature failure of a 2nd intermediate
Sendziinir inill drive roll [J]. Journal o f Marcrials Engineering and
length i s long, so the end of work roll lowers, as shown Performance. 1994. 3 ( 5 ) :049-656
in Fig.7. SCHEIDER A, WERNERS R. Modeling and optimimtion lor a 20-h
cold rolling mill [J]. Iron and Steel Engineer. 1999. 76(3):44-47.
HARA K. YAMADA T. TAKAGI K. Shape controllability for quarter
buckles of strip in 20-high Scndmnir mills [J]. lSlJ International.
1991. 31(6). 607-613
BERGER B. SCHULTE H. t3ENFER M. RlNKli F W. Advanced
20-high inill technology [J]. Metallurgical Plant and Technology
Iiitcrnarional. 2000, 23(6): 70-72. 74.
FOREHLING P. RIECKMANN J , JATTA J . High tensile. light gage
Fig.7 I<oll displacement with narrow strip width rolling with 20-11 reversing cold mills [J]. Iron and Steel Engineer,
1099. 76(3). 41-43.
PAN C. 20-High Mill and High Precise Cold Strip Rolling [MI.
For Sendzimir mill, there are hundreds of rolls-
Bcijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2003. ( i n Chinese)
assignment conditions. When the rolling force KNAPlNSKl M. FEM 3D analysia of roll deflection during plate
distribution is identical, the acting force of rolls system rolling [J]. Metalurgija, 2005. 44(3): 175-1 7X.
will change with the change of rolls-assignment, which ZHANCi G M, XlAO H, WANG C H. 'Ihrec-dimensional model for
strip hot rolling [J]. Journal o f Iron and Steel Research International.
will cause variable rolls deflection, so it is needed to 2006. I3( I ): 23-26.
adjust the AS-U-rolls. From the above results, the NILSSON A. FF. simulations of camber i n hot strip rolling [J].
increase of work roll radius will reduce the work roll Journal of Materials Proccsaing Technology. I99X. X0'X I : 325-329.
XlAO W F. ZHANG L H. ZHU Z 11. FEM analysis ofcasting roller
deflection. However, it might reduce the rolling power,
intensity under aluniinuni strip high-speed casting condition [J]
even can't roll some thin strip. So when the work roll Journal of Central South U n t \ crsity of Technology: Natural Science,
radius is not changed, it can suitably increase the radius 2000. 31(6): 54X-551.
YU H L, LIU X H. ZHAO X M. WU D. KUSARA Y. Explicit
of I st IMR and reduce the radius of 2nd IMR.
dynamic FEM analysis of multipass vcnie~il-horirontal rolling [J].
Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, 2006. I3(3): 26- 30.
4 Conclusions WANG M. YANG H, S l J N Z C, GUO L G, OU X Z. Dynamic
explicit FE modeling of hot ring rolling proceas [J]. Trans
Nonferrous Met Soc C'hina. 2006, I h ( 6 ) . 1274-1 2x0.
1 ) The rolls deflection of Sendzimir mill under CHUNG W K. CHOI S K, THOMSON I' k-. I'lircc-dimensional
different rolling forces, strip widths and rolls- simulation of the edge rolling process by the explicit linite element
assignments was simulated by explicit dynamic FEM, method [J]. Journal o f Vaterials Processing Technology. 1993.
3X( l/2): 85--l02.
which supplies a method for dealing with complex
LIU X B, TAN J P. YI Y P. Stress ticld analysis of extra-height
rolling problems. forging die using finite eleinent method [J]. Journal of Central South
2 ) The work roll deflection increases with the University ofTechnology. 1999.6( I ) : 50-62
increase of rolling force and the reduction of work roll (Edited by CHEN Wei-ping)