Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rivera
GSTATMESET 1
INTERPRETATION:
This means that the average change in net income from 2008 to 2009 is approximately
3.25%, the median is slightly greater than the mean, this shows that the mean and median
are not necessarily equal to one another
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
`
ons for Common Values of α
Upper-Tailed Two-Tailed
z > 1.280 z < -1.645 or z > 1.645
z > 1.645 z < -1.960 or z > 1.960
z > 2.330 z <-2.575 or z > 2.575
edian
Michelle D. Rivera
WAITIN TIME
28
39
23
67
37
28
56
40
28
50
51
45
44
65
61
27
24
61
34
44
64
25
24
27
29
INTERPRETATION:
since the median value is 15, this reflects that themiddle value of flight arrivals is 15min after
time, and most of the time arrival is 3 minutes later than the scheduled time.
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
0.07692
2.7504749838
gions for Common Values of α
Upper-Tailed Two-Tailed
z > 1.280 z < -1.645 or z > 1.645
z > 1.645 z < -1.960 or z > 1.960
z > 2.330 z <-2.575 or z > 2.575
MARRIED 333
DIVORCED 182
WIDOWED 24
0.3376623
Michelle D. Rivera
WAITIN TIME
mu1 7 n 50
saple 6.8 std 0.9
INTERPRETATION:
since the median value is 15, this reflects that themiddle value of flight arrivals is 15min after
time, and most of the time arrival is 3 minutes later than the scheduled time.
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
0.07692
45.377777778
gions for Common Values of α
Upper-Tailed Two-Tailed
z > 1.280 z < -1.645 or z > 1.645
z > 1.645 z < -1.960 or z > 1.960
z > 2.330 z <-2.575 or z > 2.575
GSSTATME 2
cost o hospitalization
9700 State the Null and Alternative Hypothesis:
9400 H0 μ =10000
11700 H1 μ <10000
9000 Compute Test Statistic:
9100 Population Mean (μ) 10000 Critical Regions
10500 Sample Mean (x) 9787.5 Rejection Regions
9100 Standard Deviation (s) 917.1968164 α
9800 Sample Size (n) 8 0.10
Numerator (x-μ) -212.5 0.05
Denominator (s/√n) 324.2780443 0.01
Z -0.65530184
α
Decision: accept Ho 0.10
0.05
P-value: 0.256136717 0.01
median 9550
mode 9100 INTERPRETATION:
range max v 11700 given a 99% confidence level with 1% significance level I will
min 9000 accept the null hypothesis that there is no difference between the
2700
skewness 1.520627278 ______________________________________________________
kurtosis 2.119991181 decision:
Accept the Null Hypothesis
l Regions
Rejection Regions for Common Values of α
Lower-Tailed Upper-Tailed Two-Tailed
z < -1.280 z > 1.280 z < -1.645 or z > 1.645
z < -1.645 z > 1.645 z < -1.960 or z > 1.960
z < -2.330 z > 2.330 z <-2.575 or z > 2.575
Reject H0
p < 0.10
p < 0.05
p < 0.01
___________________________________
Michelle D. Rivera
relationship, likelihood / table u will use Chi Hy
GSSTATME 2
3. The director of advertising for the Angeles Sun Times, the largest newspaper in Pampanga, i
studying the relationship between the type of community in which a subscriber resides and
thsection of the newspaper he or she reads first.
For a sample of readers, she collected the followinsample information. At the 0.01 significance level, can we
conclude that there is a relationship
between the type of community where a person resides and the section of the paper read first?
r c
c 2 = å å ni
i=1 j=1
(
MITCH:
is there is no relationshi between two objects,
H0 Independent
H1 Dependent
Given
regular price avertised special
undercharge 20 10
overcharge 15 30
correct price 200 225
Actual Table
regular price avertised special Total
undercharge 20 10 30
overcharge 15 30 45
correct price 200 225 425
Total 235 265 500
Expected Table
National News Sports Total
city 14.1 15.9 30
Suburb 21.15 23.85 45
Rural 199.75 225.25 425
Total 235 265 500
Chi2 Statistic
National News Sports Total
city 2.4687943262 2.189308176 4.658102502
Suburb 1.7882978723 1.585849057 3.374146929
Rural 0.0003128911 0.000277469 0.000590361
Total 4.2574050897 3.775434702 8.032839792
mpanga, i
s and
r c
(
c = å å nij - Eij / Eij )
2 2
i=1 j=1
Actual Table
no concern some concerns great concerns Total
doctors 15 13 12 40
nurses 20 19 21 60
pharmacists 7 7 6 20
staf 28 21 31 80
Total 70 60 70 200
Expected Table
no concern some concerns great concerns Total
doctors 14 12 14 40
nurses 21 18 21 60
pharmacists 7 6 7 20
staf 28 24 28 80
Total 70 60 70 200
Chi2 Statistic
no concern some concerns great concerns Total
doctors 0.0714285714 0.0833333333 0.2857142857 0.44047619
nurses 0.0476190476 0.0555555556 0 0.103174603
pharmacists 0 0.1666666667 0.1428571429 0.30952381
staf 0 0.375 0.3214285714 0.696428571
Total 0.119047619 0.6805555556 0.75 1.549603175
(
c = å å nij - Eij / Eij )
2 2
i=1 j=1
, based on the study,
ommunity