Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This paper was prepared for presentation at the SPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition held in Abu Dhabi, UAE, 9–11 October 2011.
This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE program committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper have not been
reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its
officers, or members. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper without the written consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers is prohibited. Permission to
reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of SPE copyright.
Abstract
Lab tests were carried out to study the gas slippage and quasi starting pressure in water-bearing gas reservoirs of low
permeability. The permeability of the testing cores is mainly lower than 1 mD. The testing results indicate that: for similar
water saturation, the lower the permeability is, the more serious the gas slippage is. For similar permeability, with the
increasing of water saturation, the gas slippage effect increases first and then decreases. The turning point is called critical
water saturation (Sw)c1. The relationship between the critical water saturation and the core coefficient is binomial, where the
core coefficient is the ratio between permeability and porosity. By curve fitting, it was found that, when the water saturation is
lower than a critical value, gas slip factor is a logarithmic function of the ratio of core coefficient and water saturation; when
water saturation is higher than the critical value, the gas slip factor is a logarithmic function of the multiplication of core
coefficient and water saturation. The quasi starting pressure gradient may exist when the gas flow in porous media that
contains water. The reason is that the increase of capillary resistance is larger than gas slippage as the water saturation rises. In
further, it was concluded that there is another critical water saturation (Sw)c2. When the water saturation is larger than the
critical value (Sw)c2, the quasi starting pressure gradient exists. The relationship between the quasi starting pressure gradient
and the ratio of core coefficient and water saturation is a power function. Further more, the relationship between the critical
water saturation and absolute permeability is also a power function.
Introduction
The important physical characteristics of gas flow are that the gas slippage effect exists when the gas flows through the porous
media, and the slip factor is used to describe the degree of slippage effect. According to the former studying, the slip factor is
affected by the absolute temperature, permeability, gas type, water saturation, and pore pressure and so on. At present, the gas
slippage in dry cores has reached agreement: the slippage effect reduces with the decrease of permeability and the increase of
temperature. But most of the gas reservoirs found in China are water-bearing gas reservoirs, with the change of the water
saturation, the capillary force will also changes, which affects the gas slippage effect. However, the experiment and the
mechanism study about which are few, and there are still some disputes: according to Klinkenburg theory, the slippage effect
is more obvious when the water saturation increases in water-bearing condition. While Rose and Fulton got the contradict
condition. In addition, when the water saturation increases, the capillary force rises too. So only when the driving pressure
gradient reaches a certain value, the gas can flow. Sometimes we called this value “starting pressure gradient”. However,
whether this starting pressure exists or not and how to determine it have not been reached agreement. This paper studied the
gas slippage effect and the quasi starting pressure gradient in water bearing gas cores by lab testing.
According to experimental results, the testing gas log permeability and reciprocal average pressure can be drawn in the
coordinate system, and then the gas slip factor can be determined by slope and intercept of the straight line. Here, K∞ is the
absolute permeability of gas in certain water saturation.
When there is no starting pressure, the gas flow should obey the following relationship:
q 10 K ∞ ( P12 − P02 ) (2)
v= =
A 2 P0 μ L
Where, v is the flow rate; q is quantity of flow; A is flow area; P1 is inlet pressure; P0 is outlet pressure; μ is viscosity of
fluid; L is length of core.
From the Eq. 2, it can be seen that the relationship between v and (P12-P02) is a straight-line passing through original
point, when the gas flow is Darcy flow. However, when there is starting pressure, the relationship between them is no longer a
straight-line. The expression is as following:
v = α ( P12 − P02 ) − β (3)
Where, α, β are constants.
Given v=0, then the quasi starting pressure is:
1
⎡β ⎤2 (4)
Pλ = ⎢ + P02 ⎥
⎣α ⎦
Where, Pλ is quasi starting pressure.
So the quasi starting pressure gradient is:
1
⎡β ⎤2
⎢ + P02 ⎥ − P0
P −P α
λ= λ 0 =⎣ ⎦ (5)
L L
Where, λ is the quasi starting pressure gradient.
Methods
Select cores taking from Sulige gas field of low permeability to carry out the physical simulation experiments. The
permeability of the cores is 0.026-4.661 mD. The formation of different water saturation was realized by “water increading
method”; the gas was nitrogen; the testing pressure is lower than 1.0 MPa, the outlet pressure is atmosphere, temperature is
25 . During the tests, the effective pressure maintains 4.5MPa. To avoid the water saturation changes obviously, wet adding
device was used to control it, so the error of estabishing water saturation is lower than 5 percent.
The common method to build the water saturation is gas driving or microwave, the water saturation is from high to low,
but these methods have a shortcoming: because the fluid used to saturate the cores is formation water, so the phenomena of
salt out may be occurred when the water saturation is becoming low, worse of all, the salt may block some pores or pore
throats, which brings some error to the testing results. While the method referred in this paper is water increasing method. The
method is adding certain amount of water gradually, then put the cores into closed container for 1 to 2 days, then absorbs the
redundant water on the surface of the cores, finally weigh the weight and calculate the water saturation. Though this method
costs a bit longer time, but it makes good of those common methods.
The experimental flow is shown in Fig. 1.
From Fig. 3, it can be seen that the critical water saturation and core coefficient have the good binominal relationship:
2
⎛K ⎞ ⎛K ⎞
( S w )c1 = −0.0455 ⎜ ∞ ⎟ + 1.0234 ⎜ ∞ ⎟ + 16.324 (6)
⎝ φ ⎠ ⎝ φ ⎠
For different cores, if the absolute permeability and porosity have been known, the critical water saturation can be
determined by the Eq. 6.
However, it is easy to find that the gas slippage not only has relation with permeability and porosity, but also with water
saturation. To find the relationship among them, curve fitting was carried out below the critical water value and above it. The
results are shown in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5.
The curve fitting results show that: the gas slip factor is logarithm to the ratio of core coefficient and water saturation,
while it is logarithm to the multiplication of core coefficient and water saturation. So the gas slip factor in water-bearing cores
can be described as following:
⎧ ⎛K ⎞
⎪b = −0.0372 ln ⎜ ∞ ⋅ S w ⎟ + 0.084,S w ≥ ( S w )c1
⎪ ⎝ φ ⎠
⎪ (7)
⎪ ⎛ K∞ ⎞
⎨b = −0.0248ln ⎜ ⎟ + 0.2044,S w < ( S w )c1
⎪ ⎝ φ ⋅ Sw ⎠
⎪ 2
⎪( S ) = −0.0455 ⎛ K ∞ ⎞ + 1.0234 ⎛ K ∞ ⎞ + 16.324
⎪⎩ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ φ ⎠ ⎝ φ ⎠
w c1
However, the quasi starting pressure gradient not only is related with core physical property, but also with the water
saturation. So we fitted the relationship between quasi starting pressure gradient and the ration of core coefficient and water
saturation according to the experimental results. The fitting result is shown in Fig. 7.
So the quasi starting pressure gradient in water-bearing formation can be described as Eq. 8:
⎧ ⎛ K ⎞
−1.2245
⎪λ = 0.0881⎜ ∞ ⎟ ,S w > ( S w )c 2
⎪ ⎝ φ ⋅ Sw ⎠
⎪ (8)
⎨λ = 0,S w ≤ ( S w )c 2
⎪
⎪( S ) = −10.697 ⎛ K ∞ ⎞ + 83.562
⎪ w c2 ⎜ ⎟
⎩ ⎝ φ ⎠
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank College of Petroleum Engineering in Xi’an Shi You University for providing experimental conditions,
and also thank Changqing Oilfield Company for supporting researching funds. In addition, it is supported by the science and
technology fund item “specific flow laws of low permeability gas reservoirs”.
Nomenclature
Kg — gas log permeability, mD; K∞ — absolute permeability, mD
b — gas slip factor, MPa p — average pressure, MPa
v — is the flow rate, m/s q — quantity of flow, m3/s
A — flow area, m2 P1 — inlet pressure, MPa
P0 — outlet pressure, MPa μ— viscosity of fluid, mPa.s
L — length of core, m α, β — constants
Pλ— quasi starting pressure, MPa λ— quasi starting pressure gradient, MPa/m
K ∞ — core coefficient, mD Sw— water saturation, %
φ
(Sw)c—critical water saturation, % Ф — porosity,%
References
1. K Sampath, C William Keighin. Factors Affecting Gas Slippage in Tight Sandstones of Cretaceous Age in the Uinta Basin. JPT, 1972,
24:120-124
2. Kewen Li, Roland N. Horne. Gas Slippage in Two-phase Flow and the Effect of Temperature, SPE 68778, 2001:1-8
3. Tuegay Ertekin, Gregory R King, Fred C. Schwerer. Dynamic Gas Slippage: A Unique Dual-Mechanism Approach to the Flow of Gas in
4. Tight Formations, SPE Formation Evaluation, 1986:43-52
5. Yu-Shu Wu, Karsten Pruess, Peter Persoff. Gas Flow in Porous Media with Klinkenberg Effects, Transport in Porous Media 1998,
32:117-137
6. W Kast, C-R. Hohenthanner Mass Transfer within the Gas-phase of Porous Media. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2000,
43(5):807-823
SPE 145803 5
Fig. 1 Experimental flow of gas slippage and quasi starting pressure gradient testing
0.1 K∞=0.300mD
experimental point
0.08
fitting curve
0.06
b(MPa)
2
0.04 y = -2E-05x + 0.0008x + 0.0685
2
R = 0.9508
0.02
0
0 20 40 60 80
Sw (%)
(a)
0.12 K∞=0.438mD
0.10 experimental point
fitting curve
0.08
b(MPa)
0.06
2
0.04 y = -0.0002x + 0.0074x + 0.0367
2
0.02 R = 0.762
0.00
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Sw (%)
(b)
6 SPE 145803
0.14 K∞=0.878mD
b(MPa)
0.08
2
0.06 y = -6E-05x + 0.0027x + 0.0823
2
0.04 R = 0.7862
0.02
0.00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Sw (%)
(c)
0.06 K∞=1.125mD
0.03 2
y = -4E-05x + 0.0018x + 0.0345
0.02 2
R = 0.9527
0.01
0.00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Sw (%)
(d)
0.10 K∞=3.028mD
0.08
0.06
b(MPa)
2
y = -8E-05x + 0.0025x + 0.0644
0.04 2 experimental point
R = 0.7571
fitting curve
0.02
0.00
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Sw (%)
(e)
SPE 145803 7
0.14 K∞=4.661mD
0.12
experimental point
0.10
fitting curve
b(MPa)
0.08
0.06 2
y = -8E-05x + 0.0013x + 0.1159
0.04 2
R = 0.8328
0.02
0.00
0 10 20 30 40 50
Sw (%)
(f)
Fig. 2 Relationship curves between water saturation and slip factor
20 experimental point
(Sw )c1 (%)
15 fitting curve
10
0
0 10 20 30 40
-3 2
K∞/φ(×10 μm )
Fig. 3 Relationship curve between critical water saturation and core coefficient
0.25
fitting curve
0.10
0.05
0.00
0 50 100 150 200
K∞/(φ.Sw )
Fig. 4 Fitting curve of slip factor below the critical water saturation
8 SPE 145803
0.25
b(MPa)
experimental point
fitting curve
0.10
0.05
0.00
0 2 4 6 8 10
K∞/φ.Sw
Fig. 5 Fitting curve of slip factor above the critical water saturation
90
y = -10.697x + 83.562
80 2
R = 0.9225
70
60 experimental point
(Sw )c2 (%)
50
fitting curve
40
30
20
10
0
0 2 4 6 8
-3 2
K∞/φ(×10 µm )
Fig. 6 Relationship curve between critical water saturation (Sw)c2 and core coefficient
0.08
0.07 -1.2245
y = 0.0881x
0.06 2
R = 0.9533
0.05 experimental point
λ(MPa/m)
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
K∞/(φ.Sw )
Fig. 7 Relationship curve between quasi starting pressure gradient and the ration of core coefficient and water saturation
SPE 145803 9