Role: Chris Bennett James Pinder Role: Sam Stokes Interests Run a well-planned and executed Manage directors Run a well-performing summer internship program for (particularly Chris and engineering department university students Sam) of departments in a fair manner This means when output is dropping due to lack of workers, This means Pinder can’t Sam may need to hire quickly, and just side with you on every sometimes without following issue with Stokes, and vice bureaucratic hiring practices like versa the 48-hour ad rule Positions I want the sole authority to Guide each party Hire interns at hire interns for the firm. (Chris or Sam) to any time for Individual departments more fair reasoning engineering should not be allowed to for issues involved in department bypass Personnel hiring interns, and without I also want the ability to set ultimately help approval of guidelines for intern hiring establish better Personnel (i.e. processes, such as the GPA guidelines for intern Chris) requirement hiring Draw on If a department decides to resources bypass Personnel’s intern established for hiring process, then the summer intern’s salary and benefits internship should come from that program to aid department, NOT mine internally hired students Reservation Price(s) Any situation where other Any situation where Any situation Directors get to hire without either party is ready where Personnel involvement of Personnel will to leave the table has sole not be accepted in any way. without agreeing to authority to hire a deal is unsuitable interns is for Pinder. As the unacceptable to boss for both Stokes directors, Pinder has the ability to establish clear, mutually beneficial guidelines for both parties BATNA (Best Disconnect the engineering interns Side with an individual Continue to hire interns Alternative to a from the rest of the Summer Intern party and demand the without approval from Negotiated program, and say it’s because of other party come in line Personnel, which may Agreement) fundamental differentiators between with your position. lead to issues with top engineering’s hiring needs and the management like rest of the firm. Note: This is the most Pinder important BATNA Note: Pinder’s BATNA supersedes mine and Stokes’ Other Power Sources Sam needs the resources, including Pinder is the boss, so he Engineering is a critical funds from salaries, from Personnel has ultimate authority function of the firm, to motivate his interns to work over the final outcome of and Sam runs it well. the negotiation. If it doesn’t go well, he can Pinder wants the summer internship choose to set terms that Sam also has been at program to work because the firm both parties must abide by Levver for a lot longer would like to get full time hires from (or walk away literally than me, so he has the program and develop a strong through voluntary greater pull with some relationship with the students’ resignation) of the significant universities members in the firm’s pecking order. Weaknesses / New to the firm, so little pull with Must not come off Doesn’t have the Vulnerabilities regards to senior members authoritative so as to resources necessary to provide for autonomy of unilaterally finance and Needs to prove himself with Pinder workers. Without that, manage an intern and other top management to get there’s a greater likelihood troupe respect and negotiating leverage in of workplace issues the future between colleagues Opening Move My first move would be to point out Pinder’s first move would Stokes’ first move Possibilities/Target the blatant disregard for firm hiring most likely be to wait and would be to downplay Price - Goal protocol by Stokes, and then state hear both sides discuss the his policy violations as that Personnel should have sole issues at hand. After that, “doing Personnel’s authority with regards to hiring Pinder will try his best to work for them”, and interns at the firm. get both sides to an then state why it’s acceptable middle point, better if Engineering My goal will be to gather as many where each department is gets to hire their own issues in my favor including: satisfied with the outcome. interns unilaterally. Setting guidelines so even if Engineering has a say in His strategy for doing so His strategy would also hiring interns, they must will most likely involve involve convincing follow practices set forth by redirecting both sides to Pinder to see his Personnel the matter at hand rather viewpoint, as Benefits will only come from than going off on a Engineering is a critical Personnel to interns if our tangent about hurt function of the firm and practices are abided by. needs to have the I’d get these goals by slowly allowing feelings or policy ability to hire when Engineering to have a say in hiring violations. needed. interns, perhaps through a system similarly followed by folks in As the boss, Pinder can However, if he feels that Financial Services (HR conducts also force a side to see an Pinder is not siding his initial screens to pass quantitative issue from a particular way, Stokes may choose metrics, and then department- viewpoint. to enter the middle specific hiring practices are ground of offering conducted such as first-round Personnel certain interviews and superdays) provisions in the intern hiring practices, such as upholding the GPA requirement and the 48-hour ad rule. Other Strategies I do not want to disclose my ultimate Pinder will want to Stokes would not want Timing/If-then positions or my BATNA (which is dispassionately view the to disclose his ultimate essentially a threat to Engineering) negotiation, so he most positions or BATNA likely will be silent for the (which is essentially a If my initial proposal fails, then I’d majority of the threat to Personnel) like to negotiate in a manner that negotiation. sways Pinder to my side, which will If his initial proposal be instrumental in getting a final In an attempt to get a fails, then Stokes most verdict that goes my way. more bipartisan likely will conclusion, Pinder may step in time-to-time to offer a fair viewpoint of how the proceedings are going.
[Use multiple pages if necessary. For multiple issue deals, you should consider developing and using an issue-value matrix such as is discussed in the text “Getting (More of) What You Want”]