You are on page 1of 4

COMM 3050

Negotiation Preparation template

NAME: Aneesh Reddy

BLOCK: 2

SELF OTHER OTHER


Role: Chris Bennett James Pinder Role: Sam Stokes
Interests Run a well-planned and executed Manage directors Run a well-performing
summer internship program for (particularly Chris and engineering department
university students Sam) of departments in a
fair manner This means when output is
dropping due to lack of workers,
This means Pinder can’t Sam may need to hire quickly, and
just side with you on every sometimes without following
issue with Stokes, and vice bureaucratic hiring practices like
versa the 48-hour ad rule
Positions  I want the sole authority to  Guide each party  Hire interns at
hire interns for the firm. (Chris or Sam) to any time for
Individual departments more fair reasoning engineering
should not be allowed to for issues involved in department
bypass Personnel hiring interns, and without
 I also want the ability to set ultimately help approval of
guidelines for intern hiring establish better Personnel (i.e.
processes, such as the GPA guidelines for intern Chris)
requirement hiring  Draw on
 If a department decides to resources
bypass Personnel’s intern established for
hiring process, then the summer
intern’s salary and benefits internship
should come from that program to aid
department, NOT mine internally hired
students
Reservation Price(s)  Any situation where other  Any situation where  Any situation
Directors get to hire without either party is ready where Personnel
involvement of Personnel will to leave the table has sole
not be accepted in any way. without agreeing to authority to hire
a deal is unsuitable interns is
for Pinder. As the unacceptable to
boss for both Stokes
directors, Pinder has
the ability to
establish clear,
mutually beneficial
guidelines for both
parties
BATNA (Best Disconnect the engineering interns Side with an individual Continue to hire interns
Alternative to a from the rest of the Summer Intern party and demand the without approval from
Negotiated program, and say it’s because of other party come in line Personnel, which may
Agreement) fundamental differentiators between with your position. lead to issues with top
engineering’s hiring needs and the management like
rest of the firm. Note: This is the most Pinder
important BATNA
Note: Pinder’s BATNA supersedes
mine and Stokes’
Other Power Sources Sam needs the resources, including Pinder is the boss, so he Engineering is a critical
funds from salaries, from Personnel has ultimate authority function of the firm,
to motivate his interns to work over the final outcome of and Sam runs it well.
the negotiation. If it
doesn’t go well, he can
Pinder wants the summer internship choose to set terms that Sam also has been at
program to work because the firm both parties must abide by Levver for a lot longer
would like to get full time hires from (or walk away literally than me, so he has
the program and develop a strong through voluntary greater pull with some
relationship with the students’ resignation) of the significant
universities members in the firm’s
pecking order.
Weaknesses / New to the firm, so little pull with Must not come off Doesn’t have the
Vulnerabilities regards to senior members authoritative so as to resources necessary to
provide for autonomy of unilaterally finance and
Needs to prove himself with Pinder workers. Without that, manage an intern
and other top management to get there’s a greater likelihood troupe
respect and negotiating leverage in of workplace issues
the future between colleagues
Opening Move My first move would be to point out Pinder’s first move would Stokes’ first move
Possibilities/Target the blatant disregard for firm hiring most likely be to wait and would be to downplay
Price - Goal protocol by Stokes, and then state hear both sides discuss the his policy violations as
that Personnel should have sole issues at hand. After that, “doing Personnel’s
authority with regards to hiring Pinder will try his best to work for them”, and
interns at the firm. get both sides to an then state why it’s
acceptable middle point, better if Engineering
My goal will be to gather as many where each department is gets to hire their own
issues in my favor including: satisfied with the outcome. interns unilaterally.
 Setting guidelines so even if
Engineering has a say in His strategy for doing so His strategy would also
hiring interns, they must will most likely involve involve convincing
follow practices set forth by redirecting both sides to Pinder to see his
Personnel the matter at hand rather viewpoint, as
 Benefits will only come from than going off on a Engineering is a critical
Personnel to interns if our tangent about hurt function of the firm and
practices are abided by. needs to have the
I’d get these goals by slowly allowing feelings or policy ability to hire when
Engineering to have a say in hiring violations. needed.
interns, perhaps through a system
similarly followed by folks in As the boss, Pinder can However, if he feels that
Financial Services (HR conducts also force a side to see an Pinder is not siding his
initial screens to pass quantitative issue from a particular way, Stokes may choose
metrics, and then department- viewpoint. to enter the middle
specific hiring practices are ground of offering
conducted such as first-round Personnel certain
interviews and superdays) provisions in the intern
hiring practices, such as
upholding the GPA
requirement and the
48-hour ad rule.
Other Strategies I do not want to disclose my ultimate Pinder will want to Stokes would not want
Timing/If-then positions or my BATNA (which is dispassionately view the to disclose his ultimate
essentially a threat to Engineering) negotiation, so he most positions or BATNA
likely will be silent for the (which is essentially a
If my initial proposal fails, then I’d majority of the threat to Personnel)
like to negotiate in a manner that negotiation.
sways Pinder to my side, which will If his initial proposal
be instrumental in getting a final In an attempt to get a fails, then Stokes most
verdict that goes my way. more bipartisan likely will
conclusion, Pinder may
step in time-to-time to
offer a fair viewpoint of
how the proceedings are
going.

[Use multiple pages if necessary. For multiple issue deals, you should consider developing and using an issue-value matrix such as
is discussed in the text “Getting (More of) What You Want”]

You might also like