HAZARD/RISK ASSESSMENT

Revision: Rev 0.0 Task/Process Assessed: Well Testing Operations

Date: 14-Oct-10 Location: Somewhere in asia
Operation: Well Testing Assessment Team: Drilling Team
Owner: Test Engineer Approved: General Manager
Severity of Consequence x Likelihood = Risk Level Scale of 1 to 5
See Risk Assessment Matrix - Consequence v Likelihood

HAZARD Initial Risk CONTROLS

Activity Steps

Consequence
List All Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Items in yellow have
Undesirable Risk thus
requiring additinoal Hazard Description and Effect Loss Category/ Population at Risk
ALARP
Prevention

TESTING

• Comprehensive load out equipment lists

been prepared and used as check lists prior to
load out.
• Interface checks completed where different
Service provider suppliers equipment requires connection.
Wrong load out, equipment missing, Lost time, delayed operations, incurred
1 equipment load 3 3 9 • Respective Supervisors oversee dispatch of
shortage on equipment when arrival at Rig costs due to delays.
out. equipment.
• Equipment load out lists checked against
programme requirements by the respective
product line Supervisors.

Testing Page 2 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
 HAZARD/RISK ASSESSMENT

Revision: Rev 0.0 Task/Process Assessed: Well Testing Operations

Date: 14-Oct-10 Location: Somewhere in asia
Operation: Well Testing Assessment Team: Drilling Team
Owner: Test Engineer Approved: General Manager
Severity of Consequence x Likelihood = Risk Level Scale of 1 to 5
See Risk Assessment Matrix - Consequence v Likelihood

HAZARD Initial Risk CONTROLS

Activity Steps

Consequence
List All Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Items in yellow have
Undesirable Risk thus
requiring additinoal Hazard Description and Effect Loss Category/ Population at Risk
ALARP
Prevention

• Good loading practices followed, all

equipment secured with appropriate tie down
straps during transportation.
• Only certified lifting equipment will be used.
• All equipment lifts will be controlled using
tag lines.
• Equipment offloaded at Petrosea by trained
and competent logistics crew. Offloading and
Equipment damage in transit resulting in handling of equipment at rig will be
Equipment coordinated by JDC personnel and competent
delay to operations.
shipping / Equipment
Personal injury during loading and roustabouts and deck foreman.
transportation to Operation delays.
2 offloading of trucks and vessels. 4 3 12 • Contractors journey management plans
shorebase, Lost time
Trucks lost, stuck on road, broken down. followed for transportation of equipment to
onward shipping
Customs / clearance issues. Petrosea shorebase.
to Hauryu-5
• Reputable transportation contractor s used,
vehicle pre checks completed prior to dispatch
where applicable.
• Customs / clearance paperwork checked
prior to load out, local procedures followed.
• Salamander co-ordinated logistics and
material management in place – Jakarta and
Petrosea.

Testing Page 3 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
 HAZARD/RISK ASSESSMENT

Revision: Rev 0.0 Task/Process Assessed: Well Testing Operations

Date: 14-Oct-10 Location: Somewhere in asia
Operation: Well Testing Assessment Team: Drilling Team
Owner: Test Engineer Approved: General Manager
Severity of Consequence x Likelihood = Risk Level Scale of 1 to 5
See Risk Assessment Matrix - Consequence v Likelihood

HAZARD Initial Risk CONTROLS

Activity Steps

Consequence
List All Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Items in yellow have
Undesirable Risk thus
requiring additinoal Hazard Description and Effect Loss Category/ Population at Risk
ALARP
Prevention

• Travel coordinated through journey

management.
Personnel Land, Air, Water transportation. • Reputable transportation companies selected
transportation to Personnel injury or fatalities. Personnel. for use.
3 and from the Delays in transport, late arrival at rig. Operational delays. 4 3 12 • Helicopter transportation company audited
worksite – . Lost time. for HSE compliance.
Hakuryu-5 • Adequate notification given for personnel
required at rig to avoid p0ossible delays.

Testing Page 4 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
 HAZARD/RISK ASSESSMENT

Revision: Rev 0.0 Task/Process Assessed: Well Testing Operations

Date: 14-Oct-10 Location: Somewhere in asia
Operation: Well Testing Assessment Team: Drilling Team
Owner: Test Engineer Approved: General Manager
Severity of Consequence x Likelihood = Risk Level Scale of 1 to 5
See Risk Assessment Matrix - Consequence v Likelihood

HAZARD Initial Risk CONTROLS

Activity Steps

Consequence
List All Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Items in yellow have
Undesirable Risk thus
requiring additinoal Hazard Description and Effect Loss Category/ Population at Risk
ALARP
Prevention

• Cranes certified for use. Operated by trained

personnel.
• All lifting equipment certified for use. Visual
colour code used for easy identification by rig
crew.
• Good lifting practices adhered to – dedicated
bansksman, use of tag lines. Only competent
JDC deck personnel involved in offloading and
moving equipment.
Heavy lifting. • Permit to work system used for heavy lifting
Dropped objects. operations. JDC.
Offloading
Crushing. • Use ladders to climb on top of equipment if
equipment. Injury to personnel.
Personal injury.
Spotting Damage to equipment. necessary.
4 Damaged equipment. 4 3 12
equipment in Delay in operations. • Use fall protection when working at heights.
Falling from heights.
place on the rig. • Check all lifts for loose objects or
Crane load exceeded.
Working at heights. transportation damage prior to moving.
• Loadout list with equipment dimensions and
weights prepared and reviewed prior to job.
• Loadout lists sent to rig ahead of equipment
arrival for planning purposes.
• All equipment lifts will be controlled using
tag lines.
• Layout pre-planned with rig OIM / marine.
Deck loading checked and verified against
equipment weights.
• Loadout lists sent to Rig.

Testing Page 5 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
 HAZARD/RISK ASSESSMENT

Revision: Rev 0.0 Task/Process Assessed: Well Testing Operations

Date: 14-Oct-10 Location: Somewhere in asia
Operation: Well Testing Assessment Team: Drilling Team
Owner: Test Engineer Approved: General Manager
Severity of Consequence x Likelihood = Risk Level Scale of 1 to 5
See Risk Assessment Matrix - Consequence v Likelihood

HAZARD Initial Risk CONTROLS

Activity Steps

Consequence
List All Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Items in yellow have
Undesirable Risk thus
requiring additinoal Hazard Description and Effect Loss Category/ Population at Risk
ALARP
Prevention

• Heavy lifts done by crane. Mechanical lifting.

Manual handling.
Slipping / tripping.
Uncertified equipment.
Rigging up
Missing equipment.
5 equipment. –
Wrong equipment.
General.
Air, water, electrical interface issues.
Bad weather, heavy rain.
• Good lifting techniques adopted.
• Toolbox talks highlight risks and hazards.
• Load out confirmed from checklists. All
Injury to personnel equipment checked upon arrival at rig.
Equipment damage.
• Equipment certification checked prior to
Delay to operations. 3 3 9
dispatch.
Lost time.
• Air, water, electric service requirements to
be identified prior to load out.
• Rig visit documented in advance, equipment
positioning and locations planned in advance.

Operational delays • Pipework quantities calculated based on

Surface Well Test
6 Shortage of pipework. Lost time. 2 3 6 dimensions of Hakuryu-5, loadout planned as
rig up.
per rig visit.

• Crossovers cut and prepared as per

requirements.
Surface Well Test • Load out as per packing lists.
7 Wrong / missing crossovers Operational delays 2 3 6
rig up. • P&ID identifies all surface equipment
crossover requirements.

Testing Page 6 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
 HAZARD/RISK ASSESSMENT

Revision: Rev 0.0 Task/Process Assessed: Well Testing Operations

Date: 14-Oct-10 Location: Somewhere in asia
Operation: Well Testing Assessment Team: Drilling Team
Owner: Test Engineer Approved: General Manager
Severity of Consequence x Likelihood = Risk Level Scale of 1 to 5
See Risk Assessment Matrix - Consequence v Likelihood

HAZARD Initial Risk CONTROLS

Activity Steps

Consequence
List All Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Items in yellow have
Undesirable Risk thus
requiring additinoal Hazard Description and Effect Loss Category/ Population at Risk
ALARP
Prevention

• Well Test personnel used to working around

equipment, familiar with pipe runs and general
layout.
Tripping hazards throughout equipment rig • Equipment layout plans adequate access and
Surface Well Test up. walkways amongst equipment.
8 Personal injury 2 3 6
rig up. Multiple flow lines and hoses. • Temporary pipework rigged up as neat as
possible to avoid crossed and multiple lines.
• Only essential personnel in the area of
operation.

Testing Page 7 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
 HAZARD/RISK ASSESSMENT

Revision: Rev 0.0 Task/Process Assessed: Well Testing Operations

Date: 14-Oct-10 Location: Somewhere in asia
Operation: Well Testing Assessment Team: Drilling Team
Owner: Test Engineer Approved: General Manager
Severity of Consequence x Likelihood = Risk Level Scale of 1 to 5
See Risk Assessment Matrix - Consequence v Likelihood

HAZARD Initial Risk CONTROLS

Activity Steps

Consequence
List All Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Items in yellow have
Undesirable Risk thus
requiring additinoal Hazard Description and Effect Loss Category/ Population at Risk
ALARP
Prevention

• Pre-job planning and briefing conducted to

Wrong hanging equipment
Shortage of slings
Uncertified equipment
Hanging burner
9 Dropped objects
booms
Fall from heights
Pinch points
align all involved parties on tasks to be
completed.
• Schlumberger specific standard operating
procedure followed throughout operations.
Procedures discussed and reviewed with JDC
personnel.
• All measurements, sling dimensions, wind
stay dimensions checked and calculated prior
to loadout.
• All lifting, handling and hanging equipment,
slings, shackles, snatchblocks, fishplates
Equipment damage inspected and certified for use.
Personal injury
• Kingposts MPI’d by third party inspector.
Delays in operations 4 3 12
• Dedicated banksman in radio contact with
Lost time
crane operator to be assigned throughout
operations.
• Certified personnel basket used for rigging
up to Kingposts.
• Tag lines used on all basket and lifting
operations.
• No personnel allowed to step on boom
before safety pins and locks installed.
• Safety pins chained to baseplates to prevent
dropping overboards.
• JDC Permit to Work system adhered to at all
times.

Testing Page 8 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
 HAZARD/RISK ASSESSMENT

Revision: Rev 0.0 Task/Process Assessed: Well Testing Operations

Date: 14-Oct-10 Location: Somewhere in asia
Operation: Well Testing Assessment Team: Drilling Team
Owner: Test Engineer Approved: General Manager
Severity of Consequence x Likelihood = Risk Level Scale of 1 to 5
See Risk Assessment Matrix - Consequence v Likelihood

HAZARD Initial Risk CONTROLS

Activity Steps

Consequence
List All Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Items in yellow have
Undesirable Risk thus
requiring additinoal Hazard Description and Effect Loss Category/ Population at Risk
ALARP
Prevention

• Pre-job safety meeting and discussion

ensures all parties are familiar with the
planned procedure. Pump operator is briefed,
well test crew member present on the pump
throughout testing.
• Well Test supervisor coordinates all pressure
testing, radios used amongst crew to maintain
good channels of communication.
• Pressure testing within design limits of
Pressure testing / high pressure release. equipment.
Closed vales, line rupture, vessel • Pressure containing equipment certified and
Surface Test Personal injury.
overpressure. fit for purpose.
10 Equipment Equipment damage. 4 3 12
Unsecured lines. • Pressure testing conducted as per SOP.
Pressure Testing
Incorrect line up. • Service company detailed pressure testing
procedure followed . Copy included in Well
Test programme to be followed don location.
• Well Test personnel trained and certified for
pressure operations.
• Low pressure tests conducted prior to all
high pressure tests.
• Pressure increased in increments of 500psi
during testing.
• Permit to work system followed.

Testing Page 9 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
 HAZARD/RISK ASSESSMENT

Revision: Rev 0.0 Task/Process Assessed: Well Testing Operations

Date: 14-Oct-10 Location: Somewhere in asia
Operation: Well Testing Assessment Team: Drilling Team
Owner: Test Engineer Approved: General Manager
Severity of Consequence x Likelihood = Risk Level Scale of 1 to 5
See Risk Assessment Matrix - Consequence v Likelihood

HAZARD Initial Risk CONTROLS

Activity Steps

Consequence
List All Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Items in yellow have
Undesirable Risk thus
requiring additinoal Hazard Description and Effect Loss Category/ Population at Risk
ALARP
Prevention

• Conduct toolbox talk amongst DST crew

prior to laying out and preparing tools.
• Prepare tools in pre-designated area, keep
non essential personnel clear by use of barrier
tape.
• Heavy lifts conducted using crane.
• Manoeuvring tools on racks to be conducted
Manual lifting by two people.
Pinch points • Chalk all tools when stationary to prevent
Tools rolling off stands, rig pitch and roll Personal injury, fatality
DST and Subsea unintentional movement.
Dropped objects Equipment damage
11 equipment 4 3 12 • Avoid pinch points between tools on racks.
Working with handtools Delays, lost time
preparation. • Competent personnel used for operations,
Blocked hydraulic lines
Spilled hydraulic fluids familiar with DST tool preparations and
operations.
• Hydraulic lines and pump units function
checked onshore, all umbilical lines flushed
and tested prior to mobilization.
• Hydraulic fluids transported in sealed
containers.
• MSDS documentation available for all fluids.

Testing Page 10 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
 HAZARD/RISK ASSESSMENT

Revision: Rev 0.0 Task/Process Assessed: Well Testing Operations

Date: 14-Oct-10 Location: Somewhere in asia
Operation: Well Testing Assessment Team: Drilling Team
Owner: Test Engineer Approved: General Manager
Severity of Consequence x Likelihood = Risk Level Scale of 1 to 5
See Risk Assessment Matrix - Consequence v Likelihood

HAZARD Initial Risk CONTROLS

Activity Steps

Consequence
List All Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Items in yellow have
Undesirable Risk thus
requiring additinoal Hazard Description and Effect Loss Category/ Population at Risk
ALARP
Prevention

• Permit to Work in place prior to pressure

Pressure testing tools
Function testing tools
High pressure operations
DST and Subsea
High pressure release
12 equipment
Pre charging tools with N2
preparation.
Flushing hydraulic lines
Hydraulic operation of tools
testing operations.
• Prejob safety meeting held prior to
operations to discuss plan.
• Pressure testing within design limits of
equipment.
• Pressure containing equipment certified and
Personal injury. fit for purpose.
Equipment damage. 4 3 12 • All tools pressure tested onshore prior to
dispatch.
• High pressure tests performed in increments
of 500psi.
• Regulators used on N2 equipment.
• N2 purity checked prior to use.
• Schlumberger procedures adhered to and
followed at all times.

Testing Page 11 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
 HAZARD/RISK ASSESSMENT

Revision: Rev 0.0 Task/Process Assessed: Well Testing Operations

Date: 14-Oct-10 Location: Somewhere in asia
Operation: Well Testing Assessment Team: Drilling Team
Owner: Test Engineer Approved: General Manager
Severity of Consequence x Likelihood = Risk Level Scale of 1 to 5
See Risk Assessment Matrix - Consequence v Likelihood

HAZARD Initial Risk CONTROLS

Activity Steps

Consequence
List All Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Items in yellow have
Undesirable Risk thus
requiring additinoal Hazard Description and Effect Loss Category/ Population at Risk
ALARP
Prevention

• Pre-job meeting and briefings conducted

prior to handling any explosives.
• JDC permit to work system adhered to for all
operations involving explosives.
• Dedicated explosive storage / transportation
bunkers used for shipping explosives.
• Explosive handling only by trained and
Personal injury. certified personnel.
Explosives handling, damage to explosives,
13 TCP preparation Equipment damage. 4 3 12 • Dedicated explosive storage area to be
unintentional detonation.
identified on site.
• Barriers in place with warning signs.
• Safe practices used for storage of primary
and secondary explosives.
• Schlumberger explosive guidelines followed
at all times.
• No gun loading operations during rain,
lightning

• Explosives inventory and hardware checked

prior to dispatch.
• Explosives inventory checked and verified
upon arrival at the rig.
Wrong interval loaded • Guns to be loaded as per Well Test
Lost time
Storage of loaded guns
Personal injury. programme intervals.
14 TCP preparation Missing explosive inventory 4 3 12
Equipment damage. • Loading sheets to be agreed and signed off
Insufficient hardware
prior to loading on the rig.
• Loading dimensions to be witnessed on site
and agreed between TCP engineer and
Salamander.

Testing Page 12 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
 HAZARD/RISK ASSESSMENT

Revision: Rev 0.0 Task/Process Assessed: Well Testing Operations

Date: 14-Oct-10 Location: Somewhere in asia
Operation: Well Testing Assessment Team: Drilling Team
Owner: Test Engineer Approved: General Manager
Severity of Consequence x Likelihood = Risk Level Scale of 1 to 5
See Risk Assessment Matrix - Consequence v Likelihood

HAZARD Initial Risk CONTROLS

Activity Steps

Consequence
List All Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Items in yellow have
Undesirable Risk thus
requiring additinoal Hazard Description and Effect Loss Category/ Population at Risk
ALARP
Prevention

• String diagrams prepared and checked prior

to use.
• Individual tool end connections identified to
be compatible with rig drill pipe.
• Required crossovers between drill pipe sizes
Wrong equipment available on the rig.
Delays in programme
Make up clean Missing interface crossovers • Load out checked upon arrival at rig.
15 Lost time 2 3 6
out string Equipment wrongly sized for casing / riser • Crossovers to work string for 4-1/2” scraper
identified and available along with tools.
• Tool specialist mobilized to prepare, check
and run tools as per programme.
• Casing, liner, riser ID’s identified and
appropriate tools selected for the job.

• Physically check tools against the

specification sheets.
• Gauge scraper and calliper all tools prior to
running.
Stuck pipe • Record all OD’s and ID’s on the string
Solids and debris in BOP ram cavities Delays in programme diagram / tally for reference.
16 Scrape casing Obstruction found in wellbore Lost time 2 3 6 • Detailed procedure for running tools and
Wellbore tools plugged cleanout included in the well test programme.
• BOP jetting planned, use of STJS and well
protector.
• Drill bit will be run with clean out string, can
drill through obstruction.

Testing Page 13 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
 HAZARD/RISK ASSESSMENT

Revision: Rev 0.0 Task/Process Assessed: Well Testing Operations

Date: 14-Oct-10 Location: Somewhere in asia
Operation: Well Testing Assessment Team: Drilling Team
Owner: Test Engineer Approved: General Manager
Severity of Consequence x Likelihood = Risk Level Scale of 1 to 5
See Risk Assessment Matrix - Consequence v Likelihood

HAZARD Initial Risk CONTROLS

Activity Steps

Consequence
List All Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Items in yellow have
Undesirable Risk thus
requiring additinoal Hazard Description and Effect Loss Category/ Population at Risk
ALARP
Prevention

• Casing clean up procedures in place with

wash trains and pills to be pumped before
brine.
• Checks on returned fluid carried out
throughout displacement.
Contaminated brine system • Fluid weight checked after mixing
Delays in programme
Fluid handling procedures
Displace mud to Lost time • Brine to be mixed and prepared onshore
17 Exposure to personnel 2 3 6
brine Personal injury • Only trained personnel used for handling and
Wrong fluid weights mixed
mixing operations.
• MSDS sheets referenced prior to handling
fluids.
• Personnel briefed on dangers of brine,
exposure to skin, eyes etc.

• Baroid procedure in place to condition mud,

circulation over shaker screens prior to
running the DST.
Excess solids in mud system • Checks on returned fluid carried out
Non homogeneous fluid Delays in programme throughout conditioning trip.
DST tool failure Missrun
Condition mud if • Fluid weight checked after displacement of
18 Unable to set and test DST packer Lost time 2 3 6
testing in mud fresh mud.
Unable to transmit pressure through mud Personal injury
system to function DST tools. • Only trained personnel used for mixing
operations.
• DST surface applied operating pressures will
be increased to compensate for mud in hole.

Testing Page 14 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
 HAZARD/RISK ASSESSMENT

Revision: Rev 0.0 Task/Process Assessed: Well Testing Operations

Date: 14-Oct-10 Location: Somewhere in asia
Operation: Well Testing Assessment Team: Drilling Team
Owner: Test Engineer Approved: General Manager
Severity of Consequence x Likelihood = Risk Level Scale of 1 to 5
See Risk Assessment Matrix - Consequence v Likelihood

HAZARD Initial Risk CONTROLS

Activity Steps

Consequence
List All Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Items in yellow have
Undesirable Risk thus
requiring additinoal Hazard Description and Effect Loss Category/ Population at Risk
ALARP
Prevention

• Casing and liners pressure tested after

Poor cement job
Delays in programme cementing.
Possibilities of gas channelling
19 Log, GR / CCL Lost time 2 3 6 • Review CBL / cement integrity with respect
No casing / liner integrity
to planned perforations.

Testing Page 15 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
 HAZARD/RISK ASSESSMENT

Revision: Rev 0.0 Task/Process Assessed: Well Testing Operations

Date: 14-Oct-10 Location: Somewhere in asia
Operation: Well Testing Assessment Team: Drilling Team
Owner: Test Engineer Approved: General Manager
Severity of Consequence x Likelihood = Risk Level Scale of 1 to 5
See Risk Assessment Matrix - Consequence v Likelihood

HAZARD Initial Risk CONTROLS

Activity Steps

Consequence
List All Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Items in yellow have
Undesirable Risk thus
requiring additinoal Hazard Description and Effect Loss Category/ Population at Risk
ALARP
Prevention

• Pre-job toolbox talks held prior to

commencing operations.
• Gun specific handling equipment used for
lifting.
• Firing head configuration requires pressure
to activate.
• Mechanical firing head has no go to prevent
detonation by dropped object, additionally,
hydrostatic pressure required to initiate
Picking up guns. detonation.
Connecting firing • Firing head shear pin calculations cross
Dropped guns.
heads. checked by Schlumberger Test Supervisor and
Premature detonation.
Arming guns. Personal injury. Salamander representative.
Dropped gun string.
Running guns in Damaged equipment.
Pressure surges when running in hole • Safety clamps used on gun assemblies.
hole. Lost equipment.
20 Incompatible make up of TCP BHA 4 3 12 • Controlled running speeds adhered to.
Connecting guns Off depth perforation.
Missing crossover to below packer • Safety factor on firing head.
to tubing joints Lost time.
Pinchpoints • Crossover and interface requirements
Connecting TCP
Over torqued connections identified in TCP/DST string diagrams.
BHA to below
packer • Crossovers checked against load out lists.
• TCP personnel will supervise make up of TCP
accessories, all gun connections will be made
by them.
• Gun connections made up by hand.
• Only trained and competent personnel
involved in the operation.
• All torque figures discussed and agreed upon
prior to start, reference values listed in
programme.

Testing Page 16 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
 HAZARD/RISK ASSESSMENT

Revision: Rev 0.0 Task/Process Assessed: Well Testing Operations

Date: 14-Oct-10 Location: Somewhere in asia
Operation: Well Testing Assessment Team: Drilling Team
Owner: Test Engineer Approved: General Manager
Severity of Consequence x Likelihood = Risk Level Scale of 1 to 5
See Risk Assessment Matrix - Consequence v Likelihood

HAZARD Initial Risk CONTROLS

Activity Steps

Consequence
List All Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Items in yellow have
Undesirable Risk thus
requiring additinoal Hazard Description and Effect Loss Category/ Population at Risk
ALARP
Prevention

• Toolbox talks to discuss operational hazards.

• Identify and use correct slips, dog collars
• Safety clamp used on all slick assemblies
when running.
• Tools chalked across connections to check
for backout / torque.
Dropped string. • All tool operations supervised by DST
Trapped fingers. Lost time
personnel.
Making up DST Telescopic tools Equipment damage
21 3 3 9 • Torque values and make up, connections
tools Over torqued connections Personal injury
Surface activation of hydraulic Jar identified by DST personnel, good
communication with driller.
• Safety clamps used on tools to keep closed
when picking up.
• Safety clamp on Jar only removed when
weight taken on string to avoid inadvertently
cocking.

• Toolbox talks to discuss operations

• Annulus open during testing.
• Annulus monitored during pressure tests.
Premature detonation of guns. Lost well • DST/TCP personnel present throughout all
Pressure testing
22 Leak on DST BHA Lost time 4 3 12 pressure tests.
the BHA
• DST tools pressure tested prior to running.
• JAM make up on all connections.
• Pump lines pressure tested prior to BHA test.

Testing Page 17 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
 HAZARD/RISK ASSESSMENT

Revision: Rev 0.0 Task/Process Assessed: Well Testing Operations

Date: 14-Oct-10 Location: Somewhere in asia
Operation: Well Testing Assessment Team: Drilling Team
Owner: Test Engineer Approved: General Manager
Severity of Consequence x Likelihood = Risk Level Scale of 1 to 5
See Risk Assessment Matrix - Consequence v Likelihood

HAZARD Initial Risk CONTROLS

Activity Steps

Consequence
List All Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Items in yellow have
Undesirable Risk thus
requiring additinoal Hazard Description and Effect Loss Category/ Population at Risk
ALARP
Prevention

• Correct lifting and handling equipment

identified and used for pipe.
• Premium connections on tubing
• Threads inspected prior to running
• Torque turn computer used on all
connections
• Hole cover used when running
Dropped pipe • Casing and liner pressure tested prior to
Tubing leaks running DST.
Damaged threads • Isolation plug pressure tested between
Connections over or under torqued zones.
Personal injury
Object dropped in hole • Casing not perforated when running DST.
Lost time
23 Running tubing Well influx while running string 3 3 9 • Ensure hydril is open before reaching BOP
Well control issues
String hangs up when running through BOP • Compensate string when entering BOP and
or Wellhead well head.
String hangs up on liner top • Exercise caution when entering liner,
Incorrect tally, string lengths wrong compensate string, reduce running speeds
• DST / Subsea personnel available on the drill
floor throughout operations to supervise
running tools.
• Intended running tally prepared and agreed
upon prior to picking up tools.
• All assemblies / pipe physically strapped
prior to picking up, lengths recorded on tally.

Testing Page 18 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
 HAZARD/RISK ASSESSMENT

Revision: Rev 0.0 Task/Process Assessed: Well Testing Operations

Date: 14-Oct-10 Location: Somewhere in asia
Operation: Well Testing Assessment Team: Drilling Team
Owner: Test Engineer Approved: General Manager
Severity of Consequence x Likelihood = Risk Level Scale of 1 to 5
See Risk Assessment Matrix - Consequence v Likelihood

HAZARD Initial Risk CONTROLS

Activity Steps

Consequence
List All Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Items in yellow have
Undesirable Risk thus
requiring additinoal Hazard Description and Effect Loss Category/ Population at Risk
ALARP
Prevention

• Correct lifting and handling equipment

identified and used for equipment
Dropped tools • Dummy run performed to confirm spaceout
Damage to tools of BOP.
Unable to land in wellhead • BOP pressure tested prior to running DST
Wrong space out, ram positioning off on • BOP cavities jetted and cleaned prior to
tools running DST
Tool malfunction • All tools function tested on deck prior to
Unable to disconnect at latch running
Personal injury
Running Subsea Unable to reconnect at latch
Lost time • Torque turn computer used on all
24 and Landing Unable to pressure test with rams closed on 3 3 9
Well control issues connections
String slick joint
Damaged threads • Hole cover used when running
Connections over or under torqued • Subsea personnel available on the drill floor
Clamps dropped in hole throughout operations to supervise running
Incorrect tally, string lengths wrong tools.
Damaged umbilicals, rig heave, bad • Intended running tally prepared and agreed
weather upon prior to picking up tools.
• All assemblies / pipe physically strapped
prior to picking up, lengths recorded on tally.

• Subsea, DST, DC’s and tubing drifted prior

Hold up when running in hole Lost time to running.
Wireline Logging tools stuck in TTV Equipment damage • Wireline depth verified against OH GR
25 3 2 6
correlation log Discrepancy between log and tally Fishing • String diagram used for tool depth reference
in conjunction with as run tally.

Testing Page 19 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
 HAZARD/RISK ASSESSMENT

Revision: Rev 0.0 Task/Process Assessed: Well Testing Operations

Date: 14-Oct-10 Location: Somewhere in asia
Operation: Well Testing Assessment Team: Drilling Team
Owner: Test Engineer Approved: General Manager
Severity of Consequence x Likelihood = Risk Level Scale of 1 to 5
See Risk Assessment Matrix - Consequence v Likelihood

HAZARD Initial Risk CONTROLS

Activity Steps

Consequence
List All Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Items in yellow have
Undesirable Risk thus
requiring additinoal Hazard Description and Effect Loss Category/ Population at Risk
ALARP
Prevention

• Crossovers and interface connections

identified on string diagrams.
• Crossover checked on equipment load out.
• Handling equipment and make up equipment
requirements identified prior to load out,
suppliers identified and equipment lists
checked by Subsea and DST Supervisor.
• Packer depth requirements verified with
correlation run.
• Tubing spaceout considers slick joint across
rams.
Heavy lifting • BOP test completed by rig prior to starting
Making up Dropped objects Lost time the testing phase of operations.
Surface Flowhead Damaged equipment Operational delays • Surface spaceout planned prior to picking up
26 3 3 9
and Coflexip Missing crossovers Personal injury Flowhead.
flowline hoses Interface issues • Pup joints numbered and selected for
surface spaceout / Flowhead stick up.
• Modified slips used when running umbilical.
• Flowhead swivel function tested prior to
making up to test string.
• Flowhead valves pressure tested on deck
prior to picking up.
• Use of hole cover enforced.
• Use wrist straps on wrenches when working
near the hole.
• Flowhead and Coflexip rig up follows
Schlumberger procedures

Testing Page 20 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
 HAZARD/RISK ASSESSMENT

Revision: Rev 0.0 Task/Process Assessed: Well Testing Operations

Date: 14-Oct-10 Location: Somewhere in asia
Operation: Well Testing Assessment Team: Drilling Team
Owner: Test Engineer Approved: General Manager
Severity of Consequence x Likelihood = Risk Level Scale of 1 to 5
See Risk Assessment Matrix - Consequence v Likelihood

HAZARD Initial Risk CONTROLS

Activity Steps

Consequence
List All Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Items in yellow have
Undesirable Risk thus
requiring additinoal Hazard Description and Effect Loss Category/ Population at Risk
ALARP
Prevention

• Packer dressed to match casing weight,

Unable to set packer, weights incorrect
Incorrect space out
27 Setting packer Unable to pressure test packer
Torque backlash when pulling slips
checked prior to running.
• Setting weights calculated prior to job, DC’s
selected accordingly.
• Programme includes casing clean up
Lost time 3 2 6 operations.
• Packer setting depth scraped.
• Turns in string calculated from packer depth
• Personnel pulling slips cautioned before
operation.

• DC’s weight sufficient for full set, verified

calculations.
• Packer dressed to match casing weight.
Pressure testing Unable to pressure test annulus against
28 Lost time 3 2 6 • Programme includes casing clean up
packer packer
operations.
• Packer setting depth scraped.

Testing Page 21 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
T

Scale of 1 to 5
v Likelihood
Residual
CONTROLS
Risk

Consequence
Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Comments/ Person Responsible

Mitigation

• Logistics infrastructure functional and set up to

receive equipment and dispatch to rig.
• All loadout lists provided in advance to logistics base
to enable forward planning and shipping of equipment
to rig.
3 2 6
• Load out lists checked against approved P&ID’s and
string diagram drawings.
• Pre-job operational meetings to address importance
of correct load out.

Testing Page 22 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
T

Scale of 1 to 5
v Likelihood
Residual
CONTROLS
Risk

Consequence
Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Comments/ Person Responsible

Mitigation

• All personnel involved in loading and handling

wearing correct PPE.
• All equipment checked upon arrival at the shorebase
for visual damage.
• Where possible equipment dispatched as a convoy.
3 2 6
• Conduct pre-job safety meetings to raise awareness
with drivers.
• Base maintains contact with truck drivers.
• Agents at place on border to deal with customs.

Testing Page 23 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
T

Scale of 1 to 5
v Likelihood
Residual
CONTROLS
Risk

Consequence
Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Comments/ Person Responsible

Mitigation

• Personnel trained for air and water transportation.

HUET and Sea Survival certification required for all
employees travelling to the rig.
3 2 6
• Emergency response plans in place for Helicopter
transportation.

Testing Page 24 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
T

Scale of 1 to 5
v Likelihood
Residual
CONTROLS
Risk

Consequence
Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Comments/ Person Responsible

Mitigation

• All lifting equipment certification checked and

verified prior to dispatch from Petrosea to rig.
• Ensure pre job safety meetings address lifting
hazards.
• Relevant service company supervisors to be involved
in planning / spotting of equipment to ensure
positioning in correct place. Avoid double handling
where possible.
• Only competent and experienced personnel used for 3 2 6
operations.
• Use of correct PPE for all personnel.
• Crane requirements should exceed maximum
anticipated load.
• Medical facilities on rig.
• Trained medic / doctor on Hakuryu-5.
• Use of dedicated JDC banksman with Hi-vis vest.

Testing Page 25 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
T

Scale of 1 to 5
v Likelihood
Residual
CONTROLS
Risk

Consequence
Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Comments/ Person Responsible

Mitigation

• Maintain adequate well site supervision during

operations.
• Use of correct PPE for all personnel
• Keep the work area tidy.
• Check all equipment on arrival at location. 3 2 6
• On site assessment of weather conditions. Weather
forecast monitored daily.
• Medic on rig available to treat injuries.
• Medivac plan in place.

• Sufficient quantities dispatched at load out.

• Requirements double checked by job Supervisor. 2 2 4

• Interface checks carried out on all equipment. 2 2 4

Testing Page 26 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
T

Scale of 1 to 5
v Likelihood
Residual
CONTROLS
Risk

Consequence
Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Comments/ Person Responsible

Mitigation

• Correct PPE work by all personnel.

• First aid treatment for light injuries available on the
2 2 4
rig.

Testing Page 27 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
T

Scale of 1 to 5
v Likelihood
Residual
CONTROLS
Risk

Consequence
Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Comments/ Person Responsible

Mitigation

• Correct personnel used by personnel. Flotation

workvests to be used for personnel working over the
side.
• Fall protection to used from rig side when working
near the side without handrail protection.
3 2 6
• Stan-by vessel to be notified and brought alongside
to monitor all over the side operations. Radio
communication with standby vessel throughout
operations.

Testing Page 28 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
T

Scale of 1 to 5
v Likelihood
Residual
CONTROLS
Risk

Consequence
Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Comments/ Person Responsible

Mitigation

• Safety tie down wires used on high pressure lines.

• Barricades, sign boards and announcements used to
keep personnel away from pressure testing.
• Keep out of the line of fire. 4 2 8
• Competent crew used for operations.
• Full PPE worn at all times.

Testing Page 29 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
T

Scale of 1 to 5
v Likelihood
Residual
CONTROLS
Risk

Consequence
Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Comments/ Person Responsible

Mitigation

• Toolbox talks to highlight risks.

• PPE used by all personnel.
• Back up tools available on board should damage 4 2 8
occur to primary tools.

Testing Page 30 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
T

Scale of 1 to 5
v Likelihood
Residual
CONTROLS
Risk

Consequence
Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Comments/ Person Responsible

Mitigation

• Barricades, sign boards and announcements used to

keep personnel away from pressure testing.
• Competent and certified crew used for operations. 4 2 8
• Full PPE worn at all times.

Testing Page 31 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
T

Scale of 1 to 5
v Likelihood
Residual
CONTROLS
Risk

Consequence
Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Comments/ Person Responsible

Mitigation

• Dedicated explosive storage area used on rig with

Jettison skid.
4 2 8
• Bunker location clear from work areas.
• Restricted access to explosives storage.

• Programme will reference planned test intervals. 4 2 8

Testing Page 32 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
T

Scale of 1 to 5
v Likelihood
Residual
CONTROLS
Risk

Consequence
Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Comments/ Person Responsible

Mitigation

• Loadouts checked.
2 2 4
• Equipment checked upon arrival at rig.

• Monitor and record all weights, PU / SO and statics.

• Watch string weights, reciprocate pipe on depth.
2 2 4
• Break circulation.

Testing Page 33 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
T

Scale of 1 to 5
v Likelihood
Residual
CONTROLS
Risk

Consequence
Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Comments/ Person Responsible

Mitigation

• Mud engineer Supervising all pit operations.

• PPE worn by mixing personnel, rubber gloves, face
shield, apron, coveralls.
• Eye wash stations in place. 2 2 4
• MSDS referenced, first aid procedure in place.
• Medical facilities available on board.

• Mud engineer Supervising all pit operations.

• PPE worn by mixing personnel, rubber gloves, face
shield, apron, coveralls. 2 2 4
• Eye wash stations in place.

Testing Page 34 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
T

Scale of 1 to 5
v Likelihood
Residual
CONTROLS
Risk

Consequence
Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Comments/ Person Responsible

Mitigation

• Consideration for remedial cementing operations a

2 2 4
possibility.

Testing Page 35 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
T

Scale of 1 to 5
v Likelihood
Residual
CONTROLS
Risk

Consequence
Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Comments/ Person Responsible

Mitigation

• Back up equipment available on location.

• Programme highlights precautions to be taken when
making up guns, toolbox talk requirements.
• Schlumberger SOP’s followed. 3 2 6
• TCP accessories thread connections compatible with
tubing connections.

Testing Page 36 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
T

Scale of 1 to 5
v Likelihood
Residual
CONTROLS
Risk

Consequence
Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Comments/ Person Responsible

Mitigation

• Competent DST personnel working with tools,

alerting floor crew of hazards and pinch points. 3 2 6
• Full PPE worn throughout operations.

• Programme highlights annulus status requirements

4 2 8
prior to testing.

Testing Page 37 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
T

Scale of 1 to 5
v Likelihood
Residual
CONTROLS
Risk

Consequence
Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Comments/ Person Responsible

Mitigation

• All lifting equipment certified for use.

• All operations supervised
• Well control crossovers and pump in equipment 3 2 6
available on rig floor when running tubing.

Testing Page 38 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
T

Scale of 1 to 5
v Likelihood
Residual
CONTROLS
Risk

Consequence
Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Comments/ Person Responsible

Mitigation

• Back up tools available on board.

• Running procedures in place and followed. 3 2 6
• Weather forecast monitored daily.

• Reduce running speed when entering BHA.

• Programme identifies maximum depth to run within
3 1 3
BHA.

Testing Page 39 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
T

Scale of 1 to 5
v Likelihood
Residual
CONTROLS
Risk

Consequence
Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Comments/ Person Responsible

Mitigation

• All equipment pressure tests witnessed and recorded

on charts.
• Toolbox talks held prior to commencing any major
step in operations. Talks highlight potential hazards
and risks associated with planned operation. 3 2 6
• Programme details all steps in the running procedure
and highlights points for further attention and
consideration.

Testing Page 40 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10
T

Scale of 1 to 5
v Likelihood
Residual
CONTROLS
Risk

Consequence
Additional Controls Required

Likelihood

Risk Level
Comments/ Person Responsible

Mitigation

• Setting slips and drag blocks checked on rig floor

prior to running in hole.
• Programme highlights requirement to check packer 3 1 3
movement prior to running.

• Packer dressed with new elastomers.

• Back up tools available on site. 3 1 3

Testing Page 41 Angklung 1

HLRA Spreadsheet Rev Draft 6-10-10