Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The sulphate, 4 CuO, SO8, is the least basic one obtained by the
action of lime on copper sulphate, and is more soluble than 10 CuO, SQ,
whilst 10 CuO, SO8, 3CaO, is the most basic one, and is that present,
together with excess of lime, in ordinary Bordeaux" mixture; it is
strongly alkaline, and insoluble, and does not itself act on ironj but as
soon as carbon dioxide is passed into the liquid containing it, it begins
to be decomposed with the formation of 10 CuO, SO,, and the mixture,
though still alkaline, acts on the iron at the rate indicated. Ordinary
copper carbonate, as will be seen, exercises only one-quarter as energetic
an action as the sulphate 10 CuO, SO8 (quantities containing equal
weights of copper being compared), and in some cases the action with
the carbonate was found to be much more feeble than that in the
experiment here recorded. ' :
When ordinary Bordeaux mixture itself was examined in this way,
taking a mixture made from equal weights of crystallized sulphate and
278 Copper Fungicides
calcium oxide, the iron remained perfectly bright in it till the current
of air had been passed through it for 130 hours; then, all the free lime
having been carbonated1, the basic sulphate began to be attacked, and
the iron was soon acted upon at the rate indicated above for 10 CuO, SO,,
3CaO.
A simple experiment of this sort must place it beyond doubt that
the copper in Bordeaux mixture is brought into the soluble condition
by the action of air, and the greater the excess of lime present, the
longer is the interval before this action commences, though in practical
spraying it will always be much shorter than in this experiment, owing
to the deposit drying up and isolating the particles of basic sulphate
from those of lime.
The following experiments with Woburn Bordeaux (10 CuO, SO8),
confirm the writer's previous results as to the great increase of the
action produced by an atmosphere of carbon dioxide, but they show, at
the same time, that the action is actually reduced by carbon dioxide
until this latter reaches a certain proportion. Except in the last
experiment, the results were obtained by drawing the air charged with
carbon dioxide, first through a bottle containing the basic sulphate, next
through apparatus capable of absorbing this gas, and then through a
second bottle with basic sulphate. In the last experiment, where
carbon dioxide itself was used, the two bottles had to be separate, the
rates of it, in the one case, and of the air, in the other, being adjusted
so as to be as nearly the same as possible. In the third experiment the
proportion of carbon dioxide was not determined, the air being drawn
from a funnel suspended over a burning candle. The results refer to
observations made after 3 hours' passage of the gas.
or a reduction of 40 per cent, per unit area exposed when the actual
area was increased ten fold. But rough calculation shows that the
same amount of copper used in these experiments, when sprayed on to
a tree would be spread over a surface 6000 times greater in area than
that of the one iron rod, and, even if the rate of action were thereby
reduced to only one-hundredth of that observed in the case of the one
rod, the actual amount of action occurring in unit time would be sixty
times greater than with the rod. Thus we may get a very energetic
absorption or fungicidal action, with a substance showing a minimum of
solubility, though the possibility of this action depends entirely on the
substance passing into solution. Of course, if the solid basic sulphate
is separated from the liquid, the latter by itself will give no appreciable
reaction with iron, just as Barker and Gimingham found that it had
but little action on fungi, simply because there is very little copper in
solution, but the fact that the presence of the solid sulphate in the
S. U. PICKERING 281
liquid is necessary for the production of an appreciable action in either
case, is certainly no proof that the solid is directly acted upon either by
the iron or the fungus; the solid merely serves to keep up the supply
of dissolved copper in the liquid.
The experiment which Barker and Gimingham rely upon as estab-
lishing definitely their view that an insoluble copper compound is
dissolved by excretion from the fungus, appears to be very unconvincing.
A drop of basic sulphate liquid on a cover-slip was dried; a drop of
liquid containing fungus spores was similarly dried on another slip, and
partially superimposed on the patch of basic sulphate. The slips were
then kept in a moist atmosphere for 24 hours, and it was found that
the spores had germinated only in the region where there was no basic
sulphate. It is difficult to see wherein the convincingness of this result
lies: for it is just what would occur if the fungicidal action were due to
the presence of soluble copper in the fungicide. That the result affords
no proof of the excretion of a solvent substance from the spores, may
be demonstrated by substituting for these a substance which certainly
excretes no copper-dissolving body, namely, potassium ferrocyanide:
a drop of a solution of this and of Woburn Bordeaux mixture are dried
on separate pieces of paper, they are then partially superimposed, and
pressed together, being kept moist by placing above them a slightly
damped piece of paper. After a time the portions of the blotches which
were in contact become red, whilst those portions which were not in
contact remain unaffected. No action occurs if the papers are kept
quite dry.
It is only necessary to add that if fungicidal action depended on a
solvent material exuded from the fungus, all copper compounds, or at
any rate all the basic sulphates and carbonates, would be equally
efficacious for a given weight of copper present, a proposition which is
contrary to all experience. Indeed ordinary Bordeaux mixture with
excess of lime should be much more effective than other compounds
with the same copper content, for the lime itself seems to have a con-
spicuous fungicidal action (Freeman, this Journal, in. 400); and this
fungicidal action, it may be remarked, accounts for the results obtained
by Barker and Gimingham (loc. cit. p. 86), when they found that
ordinary Bordeaux was effective in an atmosphere free from carbon
dioxide, which they accept as proving that carbon dioxide does not
bring the copper of such a mixture into solution.