Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sarah Kerschgens
March 1, 20018
RELIGION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2
A Kindergarten teacher Karen White has recently joined the religion Jehovah's Witnesses.
Due to her new affiliation with this religion Ms. White is refusing to sing “Happy Birthday”,
recite the “Pledge of Allegiance” , decorate the classroom for the holidays or even plan for gift
exchanges during the Christmas season. Parents quickly protested and the school principal has
recommended her dismissal as he feels she cannot meet the needs of her students. Ms. White has
the right to the Free Exercise Clause as per the First Amendment but does she have the right to
infringe her beliefs on her Kindergarten students. Ms. White as an individual is free to believe in
what she wants , but is she right to act on these beliefs in a classroom setting ? Or is their a
compelling interest in teaching these Kindergarten children the “Happy Birthday”song , being
able to recite the “Pledge of Allegiance” or knowing about the Christmas season ?
The schools principal is well within his rights to dismiss Ms. White as in the case Palmer
v. Board of Education 1979, this was also a case where a teacher refused to recite the “Pledge of
Allegiance” or to participate in certain religious activities, The courts ruled in the schools favor
citing “the First Amendment was not a teacher license for uncontrolled expression at variance
with established curriculuar content.” Furthermore, “there is a compelling state interest in the
choice and adherence to a suitable curriculum for the benefit of our young citizens and society”.
Also is favor if the school dismissing Ms. White is the ruling Skoros v City of New York
(2006). In this case a mother did not want her public school to display holiday ornaments in the
school. Here the courts ruled that “New York City's holiday display policy for its public schools,
both on its face and as applied by the defendants, comports with the Establishment and Free
Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment and does not violate a parent's right to control the
RELIGION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS 3
religious upbringing and education of her children. This is also the case in Ms. Whites case, the
Kindergarten teacher does not have the right to control what the children learn and what they do
not learn. Kindergarten children should be educated in all manners and customs of society. Ms.
White cannot decide herself what the children should or should not learn based on her own
Religious beliefs.
In favor of Ms. White is the case West Virginia State Board of Education v Barnette
(1943). Here the courts ruled held that school officials do violate the First Amendment by
compelling students to salute the flag and recite the Pledge of Allegiance. Here a group of
Jehovah's Witnesses challenged the law on First Amendment grounds. They argued that the
forced flag salute conflicted with their religious beliefs against idol worship and graven images,
and therefore violated their free exercise of religion and freedom of speech rights under the First
Amendment, this is the exact same as with Ms. White , as she is also a Jehovah Witness and
cannot be forced to recite things she does not believe in. Ms. White has the right to protect her
Also in favor of Ms. White decision not to sing “Happy Birthday”, recite the “Pledge of
Allegiance” , decorate the classroom for the holidays or even plan for gift exchanges during the
Christmas season would be the case Sherbert v Verner (1963). In this case a member of the
Seventh Adventist Religion was dismissed from her job as she refused to work on a Saturday,
which for her was her “Sabbath”. Here the courts ruled in her Sherbert's favor , this decision by
the courts made the States recognize the requirements of faith. As in Ms. Whites case , she
should have the right to execute her faith in the manner that is acceptable to her.
RELIGION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS 4
I feel the courts will decide to dismiss Ms. White . As ultimately, the teacher’s
responsibility is to deliver the curriculum in a manner that is most efficient and beneficial to the
students. In my opinion, she was not asked to conform to the beliefs or the principles of the
“Religion was once deemed to be a function of the public school system. The Northwest
Ordinance, which antedated the First Amendment, provided in Article III that "Religion,
morality, and knowledge being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind,
schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged." (Engel v Vitale 1962)
A teacher can not refuse to follow the prescribed curriculum, even if the refusal is based on
religious objections. In regards to teacher’s freedom of religion, teachers must teach the
prescribed curriculum, even if it partially or wholly offends the teacher’s religion. Also the fact
that Ms. White has only recently joined the Jehovah Witnesses means she cannot be so immersed
in the religion that it should effect her teaching if these young students.
RELIGION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS 5
REFERENCES
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/370/421.html
https://shannon3457.wordpress.com/palmer-significance-to-school-policiesprocedures/
http://caselaw.findlalw.com/us-supreme-court/374/398.htm
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-2nd-circuit/1351830.html
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/319/624.html