You are on page 1of 5

Yale University

George Grosz, "The American Scene"


Author(s): Esther da Costa Meyer
Source: Yale University Art Gallery Bulletin, Vol. 37, No. 3 (Spring, 1980), pp. 4-7
Published by: Yale University , acting through the Yale University Art Gallery
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40514202
Accessed: 23-01-2016 16:00 UTC

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/
info/about/policies/terms.jsp

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content
in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.
For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Yale University Art Gallery and Yale University are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Yale
University Art Gallery Bulletin.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 130.191.17.38 on Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:00:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Fig. i GeorgeGrosz,
GeorgeGrosz(1893-1959),
Harlem Street. TheAmericanScene
SabarskyGallery,New York.

Estherda Costa Meyer

In the summerof 1932, at the invitation


of theArt Students'League, George
Grosz arrivedin Americaforthe first
time.The invitationitselfwas theobject
of considerablecontroversy and ended in
theresignationof both thepresidentand
the directorof theleague,the latter
havingdeclaredthatGrosz was not a
"healthyinfluencefortheprogressof
Americanyouth."1The reasonsbehind
the uproarare not hardto guess.Grosz
had achieveda well-earnedreputationas
the "pitilessDaumier of a torturedGer-
many."2The taskhe had set was to ex-
pose, by meansof his art,the mechanisms
of totalitarianismin Germanyand the
corruptclassesthatcontrolledtheprocess.
His pictorialmeans were congruentwith
his aims. He had developed earlywhat he
termedhis knife-edgeline bestsuitedto
depicthis indictmentof Germansociety.
The sharpconcisionof his drawing
broughtthe spectatorintoimmediatecon-
tactwiththe social and politicalsignifi-
cance of the workin question.Grosz was
notconcernedwithprovidingtheviewer
witha purelyaestheticexperience.
Like all German intellectualsof his
generation,the artistsuffered froman
acute case of Grossstadtpessimismus* and
saw the modernmetropolisas a monster
thatwrestedeverytraitof individuality
fromits inhabitantsand reducedthemto
a featureless,amorphousmass.Grosz' main
targetwas thequintessentialGerman
bourgeois: smug,self-satisfied,stillliving
in an imaginaryWalhalla withthe sounds
of Siegfriedand the versesof Goethe
ringingin his ears,totallyblind to the
tragicrealitybroughtabout by war and
defeat.
When the invitationto teachat the
ArtStudents'League arrived,theWeimar
Republic was on the brinkof collapse.
Bitterlydisillusionedwiththepolitical
situationand withhis own art,whichhad
provedso powerlessto avertcatastrophe,
Grosz came to Americain the hope of
startingboth life and artafresh.One week
afterthe artistleftGermany,Hitler took
4

This content downloaded from 130.191.17.38 on Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:00:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2
George Grosz,Shoe Shine.
SabarskyGallery,New York.

in Berlin: "One had the impressionthat Footnotes


powerand Grosz was declared"Bolshevik 1
EnemyNo. i." Americansof all races,classesand profes-
Quoted in "Mild Monster,"
In theUnited Stateshis workunder- sions were at one withtheworld,and this unsignedarticlein Time,
wenta drasticchange in contentas well Americanworld,superficially, seemed 20 June1932,p. 20.
as style.Hithertohis arthad servedto muchmorecolorful,muchricherthan 2
the German."5 Rom Landau, quoted in
expressmeaningsoutsideitself.The RichardBoyer,"ProfileHI,"
politicianin him stuntedthegrowthof The AmericanScene,a Grosz water-
The New Yorker,11 Decem-
theartist:"The finerartist,"he latersaid, colorgiven to Yale by Mr. Fitch ( Fig. 3 ) ber 1943, p. 39.
"thepainterthatlived withinme, was is an excellentexample of the new 3
somehowrepressedand forcedintothe "American"George Grosz. The signature See Beth IrwinLewis, George
on the versobearsthedate 1932, which Grosz: Artand Politicsin
background."4 the Weimar Republic,
Manhattanfascinatedhim with its indicatesthatit was executedduringthe
Madison, Wis., 197 1, p. 15.
wealth,modernityand above all, withthe artist'sfirstsummerat the ArtStudents' 4
ethnicand culturaldiversityof its in- League.6This workshowsthe artistexam- George Grosz,A LittleYes
habitants,and Grosz'searlyworksin iningthecitycrowdwiththegustoof a and a Big No, New York,
Americashow thetremendousimpactof Baudelaireflâneur.The urbansetting 1946, p. 274.
itselfis no longerimportant.What Grosz 5
New York City ( Figs. 1,2). This young, Ibid., p. 266.
vigorouspopulationof self-mademen attemptsto captureis the fleetingflowof 6
contrastedsharplywiththe humanmisery faces,gesturesand costumes,the human The rectoshows another

This content downloaded from 130.191.17.38 on Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:00:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
writtenmuch
inscription, configurations whichincessantly alterthe stock,notfarfromBayside,Long
later,whenGrosz presented physiognomy of the citystreets. Island,whereGroszhadsettledwithhis
the drawingto a former
student:"To Caesar / to
Butitis notonlyGrosz'sattitude family.ButKuniyoshi's presencein this
remember/ his old teacher/ towardthecitywhichchanged. Afterre- drawingis ofsymbolic as wellas bio-
George Grosz / Douglaston / defining hisartisticaims,Groszalso graphicimport. Whatmusthavemadea
Nov. 39." developednew, more appropriate tech- deepimpression onGroszwasKuniyoshi's
and
niques began to dwellon the"artistic" Americanization, hissuccessfulintegra-
sideforitsownsake.Topicalsignificance tionas artistandcitizenintoa radically
wasstillimportant butwasnotallowed differentculture.Grosz,likemanyother
to dominate. Groszinterpreted American politicalexiles,wasdesperately trying to
city sceneslessin terms ofline than in achieve thisgoal,thechance to erase the
patchesofcolor.In The American Scene, pastandbeginlifeanew.Thisis,in fact,
byallowingtheliquidwashestobe ab- thethemeofall Grosz'sdrawings of the
sorbedbytheirregularities oftheporous period(Fig. 4). As a closeinspection will
paper,he achieveda grainytexture that reveal,Grosz'saverageAmerican wasof
givesthecolorsa lifeoftheirown.He diverseethnicandcultural origins.These
didawaywithdarkhuesaltogether, figuresweremorethanverifiable city
leavingonlysoft,luminous ones. types;theywerelivingproofoftheun-
One elementin theiconography of limitedpossibilities
thatthecityheldfor
Yale's watercolor is ofparticularinterest. them.In thisrespect,New Yorkwas
Grosz'sfriend, theartist Yasuo Kuniyoshi, muchmorethana precisegeographical or
is prominently featured in thecenterwith historical entityforGrosz;itwasa
a "Y" pullover. The twomenundoubtedly metaphor expressiveofthepossibility
metat theArtStudents' Leaguewhere ofrebirth.
bothtaughtin 1933.Groszalsovisited
Kuniyoshi at thelatter'shomein Wood-
6

This content downloaded from 130.191.17.38 on Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:00:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Fig. 3 Fig. 4
George Grosz,The American George Grosz,New York
StreetScene. Sabarsky
Scene, 1932. Watercolor,
i8!4 x 22^ inches.Yale Gallery,New York.
UniversityArtGallery.Gift
of GeorgeHopper Fitch,B.A.
1932. I953.29-I

This content downloaded from 130.191.17.38 on Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:00:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

You might also like