Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Body
Novel approaches, Experimental/ Research Methodology, Result and Analysis
Your contributions and their significances, discussion of results in context of literature
Connection with introduction through new findings, hypothesis etc.
What you claim in introduction must be proved/connect well with your discussions/ analysis
etc.
Future work (if needed, i.e. any improvement that can be done on your this work)
Conclusions
Highlights of your work, what you can say with confidence are true about your work.
Significant contributions that advanced the state of the art
Usefulness and importance of your work
ORGANIZATION OF IDEAS: Make sure each of your key points is easy to explain with aid of the material on your slides. Do not read
directly from the slide during your presentation. You shouldn't need to prepare a written speech, although it is often a good idea to prepare
the opening and closing sentences in advance. It is very important that you rehearse your presentation in front of an audience before you
give your presentation.
IEDM guidelines
Abstracts for review must clearly state:
The purpose of the work;
The manner and degree to which it advances the art;
Specific new results that have been obtained and their significance.
THE DEGREE TO WHICH THE ABSTRACT DEALS WITH THESE ISSUES WILL STRONGLY
AFFECT WHETHER THE PAPER IS ACCEPTED. The most common cause of rejection of
submitted papers is a lack of specific results. Only work that has not been previously published at the
time of the conference will be considered. Paper acceptance will be based solely on the information
provided on the 3-page abstract submitted. Promises of upcoming results will be ignored.
How to Write for the IEDM
Each year, the IEDM rejects many paper submissions simply because the authors have not met the
conference’s specific, stated requirements. Because our requirements differ from those of other
conferences, we have prepared this guide to help you better understand what the IEDM is seeking:
Examples of submissions from prior years which were accepted may be found on the website
Include Specific, Complete Data: By far the most common reason an otherwise worthy paper
submission is rejected is because it does not contain enough data, whether from physical experiments or
modeling simulations that have been performed. Other conferences may welcome a one- or two-paragraph
abstract with one or two figures, but the IEDM is seeking submissions which give a complete, detailed
picture of the work involved, and why it is important and relevant. The more detailed yours is, the better
chance you have to convince the review committee that the work you have performed is suitable for
presentation.
Say What You’ve Done, Not What You Will Do: The IEDM Call for Papers states specifically that
promises of upcoming results will be ignored, yet many prospective authors either miss or ignore this
point. The fact is, paper submissions are rejected automatically if they say that a series of supporting
experiments or simulations will be completed by the time of the conference. Therefore, your job is to
describe work which has been accomplished already. It is perfectly appropriate to update data in
December that were in a paper submission, but not having base data at the time of submission means the
paper has no chance.
The First Paragraph is Critical: The first paragraph of your submission really should be a mini-abstract
of the paper, such that if the reviewer reads nothing else, it will be clear what the paper is about and why it
is important. Authors should put some actual numerical results in the first paragraph, and tell why they are
significant.
Put Your Work into a Context: The field has grown and become quite specialized, and it would be a
mistake to assume all of the people reviewing and rating your paper are as familiar with the importance
and relevance of your topic as you are. Therefore, put your work into a context. Interpret it and tell why it
is important. The figure captions also should be descriptive and interpretive, to the extent possible. For
example, try not to say only what a given plot describes, but why it is important in the first place to have
these data points.
Go Beyond Incremental: The chances of a paper being accepted are much greater if the subject matter
goes beyond incremental device or process improvements.