Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mikael Johansson, Avesta Research Centre, Outokumpu Stainless AB, Avesta, Sweden
Elin M. Westin, Avesta Research Centre, Outokumpu Stainless AB, Avesta, Sweden
Now at: Böhler Schweißtechnik GmbH Austria, Kapfenberg, Austria
Introduction 0.6
0.5
Duplex stainless steels combine a number of attractive features. 0.4 Sigma phase
The two phase microstructure, with approximately equal amounts 0.3
of austenite and ferrite, imparts a higher strength than the
0.2
corresponding austenitic grades and a good resistance to stress
0.1 Nitrides, carbides
corrosion cracking. The lower nickel contents of duplex grades,
typically in the range 1 – 7% compared with 8 – 25 % in the 0.0
500 1000 1500
austenitic grades also gives cost advantages and better price
Temperature (°C)
stability in times of nickel price volatility. In the steel mill, the
duplex stainless steels are produced by a very well controlled Figure 1 Equilibrium phases in a 22Cr duplex stainless steel as a function of
process of rolling, annealing and pickling in order to impart the temperature, calculation using ThermoCalc software with the TCFE5 database.
optimal properties to the material, whether it be as thick plate,
pipe, tube, precision strip or bar. The microstructural issues to be faced when welding duplex
However, the vast majority of applications require welding, stainless steels are thus multiple and only when a satisfactory
which introduces the metallurgical challenges that heating should microstructure is attained will adequate corrosion properties be
not give rise to undesirable phase changes and that a favorable achieved. Having said that, however, there is a certain degree of
structure must be reformed in a matter of seconds after melting. tolerance to the presence of minor amounts of precipitated
This applies both to the weld metal, which is melted and can be phases before the corrosion performance is affected.
1/2014 | 3
UNS EN Cr Ni Mo Mn N PREN
an increase in measured current without any actual pitting Normal range CPT G150
Critical pitting temperature (°C)
20
0
S32101 S32304 S82441 S32205 S32750
Figure 2 Typical critical temperatures for pitting and crevice corrosion of base
metal of different duplex base materials
1/2014 | 4
If duplex stainless steels are subject to slow cooling, as may occur the superduplex S32750, with an appreciable decrease occurring
in conjunction with welding with a very high heat input, or after 10 minutes at this temperature. Scatter bands have been
inappropriate heat treatment in the temperature range omitted from the figure for clarity, but are detailed in [1]. The
300 – 1000 °C (300 – 800 °C for the leaner duplex grades) grades S32304 and S32101 are largely insensitive to heat
microstructural changes, including precipitation of secondary treatment in this temperature range, because their leaner alloying
phases and 475 °C embrittlement, can occur. This is illustrated in concept means that they are remarkably resistant to precipitation
Figure 3 which includes typical microstructures after longer heat of intermetallic phases. However, they do show some decrease in
treatment times. The effect of holding times of 1, 10 or 30 CPT as a result of holding times at 700 °C, where precipitation is
minutes at either 850 °C or 700 °C on pitting corrosion resistance dominated by nitrides and carbides which can form in the phase
is shown in Figure 4. This indicates that a slight drop in CPT occurs boundaries.
after only 1 minute at 850 °C for the standard duplex S32205 and
11000
S32750
1000
900 Intermetallics
S32205 S32101
Temperature (°C)
800
Carbides
& nitrides
700 S32304
600
500
Spinodal
”475 C”
400 embrittlement
300
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
(36s) (6 min) Time (h)
Figure 3 Precipitation kinetics for duplex grades evaluated as the conditions required to give a 50 % reduction in impact toughness, and microstructures illustrating
intermetallic phases, predominantly sigma phase, and carbides/nitrides
100 100
700 °C 850 °C
90 S32750 90 S32750
80 80
70 70
S32205 S32205
SensitisedCPT (°C)
SensitisedCPT (°C)
60 60
0.1 M NaCl 0.1 M NaCl
50 50
40 S32304 40 S32304
S32101 S32101
30 30
20 20
10 10
1 min 10 min 30 min 1 min 10 min 30 min
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100
Figure 4 Effect of holding time at 700 °C or 850 °C in decreasing the CPT compared to that of the base material. 700 °C is the more detrimental temperature
for the lean grades S32101 and S32304 while 850 °C has a larger influence for the standards S32205 or the superduplex S32750
1/2014 | 5
the CPT to the same level as that of the unwelded base material,
50
if nitrogen shielding is employed.
An even more demanding welding process is spot welding, 40 S32304
because the low heat input and thus rapid cooling can give a very S32101
30
ferritic weld. Figure 7 using data from [5] shows how a drop of
around 15 °C in CPT occurs as a result of resistance spot welding 20
thin sheets of duplex steels. In the case of the lean duplex 10
S32101, however, this could be restored to a similar level as the
base material by the use of a protective argon atmosphere to 0
0 20 40 60 80 100
minimize the oxidation of the spot weld. This was particularly
Base metal CPT (°C)
notable since the weld microstructure was far from optimal, with a
high ferrite content of 75 – 85 % and some nitrides present in the
Figure 6 Critical pitting corrosion temperatures according to ASTM G150 for
microstructure. The austenite formation was somewhat lower for the root side of single-side GTA welds on 1 mm material with argon as both
the other two duplex grades, S32304 and S2205, due to the lower shielding and backing gas or with Ar + 2 % N2 as shielding gas and 90 % N2 +
nitrogen contents in these grades. 10 % H2 as backing gas, based on data from [3,4].
100
Shielding gas No shielding
Visible oxide
90
Shielding oxide
80
S32205
70
Spot weld CPT (°C)
60
50 S32304
40
30
S32101
20
10
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Figure 7 ASTM G150 critical pitting temperature for spot welds in three duplex grades. The beneficial effect of using a shielding gas is apparent for S32101 and
gives a CPT on a par with the base material, in spite of the presence of nitrides in the microstructure, based on data from [5].
1/2014 | 6
The corrosion performance of a number of welds in the lean duplex composition. Adding nitrogen via the shielding gas could have a
grade S32101 are shown in Figure 8, based on data from [6,7]. In beneficial effect on the weld microstructure, as is illustrated in the
each case the base material CPT is given as a reference point, this microstructures, but for the autogenous GTA welds was found to
shows some variation because of the different surfaces and have only a minor influence on the CPT, increasing it from 15 to
product forms tested. All welds were pickled prior to corrosion 17 °C. Even most laser welds showed acceptable CPT values,
testing, attempts to test the GTA welds with residual weld oxides above the normally specified minimum of 15 °C for base material.
caused the CPT measurement to terminate just after the starting The exceptions were the fiber laser weld in 2 mm material and the
temperature of 0 °C due to oxide dissolution but no pitting. The Nd:YAG laser weld in 1mm material, but in both cases a switch to
figure shows that in the majority of cases the weld CPT was close hybrid welding with leading GTA or GMA gave a significant
to that of the base material. This even applies to autogenous improvement.
welds, where there is no filler metal added to adjust the weld
Top
GTA-5 mm (C)
Nd:YAG-1 mm (A)
Nd:YAG-1 mm (B)
Nd:YAG/GTA-1 mm (B)
CO2-1 mm (A)
CO2-2 mm (A) (B)
Fiber-1 mm (A)
Fiber/GMA-1 mm (C)
Root
Fiber-2 mm (A)
Fiber/GMA-2 mm (C)
Nd:YAG-1 mm (A)
Nd:YAG-1 mm (B)
Nd:YAG/GTA-1 mm (B)
0 10 20 30 40 50
CPT (°C)
Figure 8 Critical pitting temperatures for various welds in the lean duplex grade S32101, based on data from [6,7]. These include GTA and Nd:YAG, CO2 or fiber laser
welds which were either autogenous (A) or with a filler (B = W 23 7 N L, C = W 22 9 3 NL or G 22 9 3 NL). Micrographs show a reduction in the amount of surface
nitride for GTA welds with Ar + 2% N2 (lower photograph) compared to pure argon (top) but little difference in CPT. The lower CPT values (circled) were improved by
hybrid welding.
1/2014 | 7
Conclusions References
Results presented in this paper have demonstrated that excellent [1] H. Liu, P. Johansson and M. Liljas: Structural evolution of LDX
pitting corrosion resistance, on a par with that of the base material, 2101 (EN1.4162) during isothermal ageing at 600 – 850 °C.
can be achieved for welds in duplex stainless steels. A critical Proc. 6th European Stainless Steel conference, Helsinki
factor is the removal of weld oxide by pickling, or minimization of 2008).
oxidation by efficient use of shielding and backing gas. Nitrogen [2] E. M. Westin: Pitting corrosion resistance of GTA welded lean
additions to the shielding gas can also have a beneficial effect on duplex stainless steel. Welding in the World 54 (2010) 11/12
weld metal pitting resistance by increasing the weld metal nitrogen R308-321.
content and promoting austenite reformation. The high nitrogen
[3] E. M. Westin & D. Serrander: Experience in welding stainless
content of the lean duplex steel UNS S32101 means that good
steels for water heater applications. Welding in the World I56
corrosion resistance can be achieved even in autogenous GTA
(2012) 5/6 14 – 28. IIW Doc.-No. IX-2357-11
welds, laser welds and resistance spot welds.
[4] E. M. Westin, M. M. Johansson and R. F. A. Pettersson: Effect
of nitrogen-containing shielding and backing gas on the pitting
corrosion resistance of welded lean duplex stainless steel
EN 1.4162. IIW Doc. II-C-437-11. Accepted for publication in
Welding in the World.
[5] A. Thulin, M. Johansson, S. Mameng: Properties of resistance
spot welded duplex stainless steel. Proc. Duplex Stainless
Steel World 2010
[6] E. M. Westin: Corrosion resistance of welded lean duplex
stainless steel. Proc. Stainless Steel World 2008.
[7] M. M. Johansson, E. M. Westin, J. Oliver and R.F.A. Pettersson:
Localised corrosion resistance of welded austenitic and lean
duplex stainless steels. Welding in the World 55 (2011) 9/10
19 – 27.
Information given in this brochure may be subject to alterations without notice. Care has been taken to
ensure that the contents of this publication are accurate but Outokumpu and its affiliated companies do
not accept responsibility for errors or for information which is found to be misleading. Suggestions for
or descriptions of the end use or application of products or methods of working are for information only
and Outokumpu and its affiliated companies accept no liability in respect thereof. Before using products
supplied or manufactured by the company the customer should satisfy himself of their suitability.
research.stainless@outokumpu.com
outokumpu.com