Number of Users: 50

Number of IT Experts 10

USERS USERS IT EXPERTS SUMM

Very Good

Very Good
Excellent

Excellent

Excellent
Good

Good
Poor

Poor
Fair

Fair
FUNCTIONALITY
1. Completeness 15 15 5 10 5 7 2 1 0 0 22
2. Correctness 20 20 10 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 25
3. Appropriateness 18 12 20 0 0 0 3 7 0 0 18

RELIABILITY
4. Maturity 10 10 20 10 0 5 3 0 1 1 15
5. Availability 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6. Fault Tolerance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7. Recoverabilty 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

USABILITY
8. Recognizability 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9. Learnability 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10.Operability 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11. Error Protection 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
12. UI Aesthetics 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13. Accessibility 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FOR IT EXPERTS ONLY
PERFORMANCE EFFICIENCY
14. Time Behavior 6 2 1 1 0 6
15. Resource Utilization 0 0 0 0 0 0
16. Capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0

COMPATIBILITY
17. Co-existence 6 2 1 1 0 6
18. Interoperability 0 0 0 0 0 0

SECURITY
19. Confidentiality 6 2 1 1 0 6
20. Integrity 0 0 0 0 0 0
21. Non-repudiation 0 0 0 0 0 0
22. Accountability 0 0 0 0 0 0
23. Authenticity 0 0 0 0 0 0

MAINTAINABILITY
24. Modularity 0 0 0 0 0 0
25. Reusability 0 0 0 0 0 0
26. Analysability 0 0 0 0 0 0
27. Modifiability 0 0 0 0 0 0
 28. Testability 0 0 0 0 0 0

PORTABILITY
29. Adaptability 0 0 0 0 0 0
30. Installability 0 0 0 0 0 0
31. Replaceability 0 0 0 0 0 0
 SUMMARY
5 4 3 2 1

Total No. of Evaluators

Very Good

Very Good
Excellent
Good

Good
Poor

Poor
Fair

Fair
FUNCTIONALITY
17 6 10 5 60 110 68 18 20 5
25 10 0 0 60 125 100 30 0 0
15 27 0 0 60 90 60 81 0 0

RELIABILITY
13 20 11 1 60 75 52 60 22 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

USABILITY
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ERTS ONLY
PERFORMANCE EFFICIENCY
2 1 1 0 10 30 8 3 2 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

COMPATIBILITY
2 1 1 0 10 30 8 3 2 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SECURITY
2 1 1 0 10 30 8 3 2 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MAINTAINABILITY
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PORTABILITY
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 Weighted Mean

Interpretation
Overall Evaluation of the Program
FUNCTIONALITY Software Evaluation Characteristics
1. Completeness 3.68 Very Good FUNCTIONALITY
2. Correctness 4.25 Excellent RELIABILITY
3. Appropriateness 3.85 Very Good USABILITY
MEAN 3.93 Very Good PERFORMANCE EFFICIENCY
RELIABILITY COMPATIBILITY
4. Maturity 3.50 SECURITY
5. Availability 0.00 MAINTAINABILITY
6. Fault Tolerance 0.00 PORTABILITY
7. Recoverabilty 0.00 Overall Mean
MEAN 0.88
USABILITY
8. Recognizability 0.00
9. Learnability 0.00
10.Operability 0.00
11. Error Protection 0.00
12. UI Aesthetics 0.00
13. Accessibility 0.00
MEAN 0.00
PERFORMANCE EFFICIENCY
14. Time Behavior 4.30
15. Resource Utilization 0.00
16. Capacity 0.00
MEAN 1.43
COMPATIBILITY
17. Co-existence 4.30
18. Interoperability 0.00
MEAN 2.15
SECURITY
19. Confidentiality 4.30
20. Integrity 0.00
21. Non-repudiation 0.00
22. Accountability 0.00
23. Authenticity 0.00
MEAN 0.86
MAINTAINABILITY
24. Modularity 0.00
25. Reusability 0.00
26. Analysability 0.00
27. Modifiability 0.00
 28. Testability 0.00
MEAN 0.00
PORTABILITY
29. Adaptability 0.00
30. Installability 0.00
31. Replaceability 0.00
MEAN 0.00
he Program
Mean Interpretation
3.93 Very Good Scale Interpretation
0.88 4.21 to 5.00 Excellent
0.00 3.41 to 4.20 Very Good
1.43 2.61 to 3.40 Good
2.15 1.81 to 2.60 Fair
0.86 1.00 to 1.80 Poor
0.00
0.00
1.56
 Table 10. Performance Tests / Stress Tests for Different File on 800x600 Image Size

Data File Type ==> Microsoft Word(.doc) Microsoft Excel(.xls) Executable File (.exe) Text File (.txt) Image File(.jpg)
File Size(kilobytes) ==> 30kB 33.5kB 42.1kB 34kB 30kB
Image Size(no.of pixels)==> 800 x 600 800 x 600 800 x 600 800 x 600 800 x 600
EXECUTION TIME EXECUTION TIME EXECUTION TIME EXECUTION TIME EXECUTION TIME
Number of Error (in seconds) Error (in seconds) Error (in seconds) Error (in seconds) Error (in seconds)
Passes Occurred Hide Extract Occurred Hide Extract Occurred Hide Extract Occurred Hide Extract Occurred Hide Extract

1 none 13.10 13.00 none 15.00 15.50 none 21.20 22.30 none 14.00 14.20 none 15.20 15.00
2 none 13.20 13.00 none 15.30 15.00 none 21.00 21.00 none 14.20 14.00 none 14.70 15.00
3 none 13.00 12.70 none 14.70 14.50 none 22.30 22.10 none 13.70 14.10 none 14.80 14.50
4 none 13.10 13.20 none 14.90 15.10 none 20.90 21.20 none 14.20 14.00 none 15.10 15.30
5 none 13.20 13.20 none 15.00 15.20 none 21.70 21.30 none 14.30 13.90 none 15.50 15.00

Mean Execution Time ==> 13.12 13.02 14.98 15.06 21.42 21.58 14.08 14.04 15.06 14.96

Performance Tests / Stress Tests were conducted on the program using an image size of 800 x 600 on different file types
(i.e. Microsoft Word document, Microsoft Excel document, Executable File, Text File and Image File). Tests show that no errors
occurred during program execution. The tests also show that there is no significant difference in terms of time execution between
encryption and decryption of hidden messages. And that the time execution of hiding and extracting a file depends on the size of
both the image file used for covering and the file needed to be hidden.