CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL

UNSWAGATI CIREBON
JOURNAL

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT DESIGN OF JAKARTA-CIKAMPEK II

ELEVATED TOLL ROAD PROJECT (P.186-P.187)
Abdul Khalim**, Dr.H.Saihul Anwar Ir.,M.Eng.,MM*, Nikko Rozy ST.,MT.*

* Lecturer & Examiners of Civil Engineering Program of Unswagati

** Student of Civil Engineering Program of Unswagati

ABSTARCT

The success of a major construction project, undoubtedly offset by a good

management. A construction project requires a significant amount of resources, and also
must considering the efficiency, effectiveness and cost factors. The Jakarta-Cikampek II
Elevated Toll Road project is an improved infrastructure project from the existing Jakarta-
Cikampek Toll Road. The Toll project is built on Eksisting Jakarta-Cikampek Toll Road,
its existence amid the highway, bringing a big challenge. So in the course of this project
requires special methods, such as in erection pier head in this project will be done using
Sosrobahu Method, so it will ease the erection process. Because this type of project
construction in such terrain is futuristic, it is necessary to propose methods with different
versions to enrich the methods in construction management.

Keyword : Scheduling, CPM, Analysis, Coefficient, Gantt Chart,

Implementation

1. Preliminary The Jakarta-Cikampek II Elevated

1.1. Background Toll Road project is an improved
infrastructure project from the
The success of a major
existing Jakarta-Cikampek Road
construction project, undoubtly
Toll. The toll road project will
offset by a good management. A
increase the cargo load capacity
construction project requires a
of Jakarta-Cikampek toll road by
significant amount of resources,
constructing the Jakarta
and also must considering the
Cikampek Toll Road Structure
efficiency, effectiveness and cost
with the type of flyover
factors.
construction built just above the
existing Toll Road.

1 | Journal of Construction Management Design of Jakarta-Cikampek II Elevated Toll Road Project

(P.186-P.187)
 The construction of the Jakarta- a. Total volume of each work
Cikampek II Elevated Toll Road required for construction
project requires special attention, project Jakarta-Cikampek II
especially in the implementation Elevated Toll Road
stage in the field. The Toll project b. Determine the value of
is built on Existing Jakarta- effectiveness, efficiency and
Cikampek Toll Road, its existence operational time on the type of
amid the highway, bringing a big materials used and the work
challenge. So in the course of this required
project requires special methods, c. Determine the right method of
such as in erection pier head in project implementation
this project will be done using d. Determining the right time
Sosrobahu Method, so it will ease schedule for project
the erection process. implementation
1.3. Scope of Problem
This will be the focus of the
a. Calculates the volume of
authors to plan the construction of
work carried out in the
highway toll roads in the middle
project
of Jakarta-Cikampek toll road
b. Accumulating construction
routine. Because this type of
project costs needed, and
project construction in such
determining the value of its
terrain is futuristic, it is necessary
efficiency.
to propose methods with different
c. Identify networking
versions to enrich the methods in
d. Not compare project costs
construction management. With
obtained during research on
the participation of the authors in
project costs determined by
proposing the methods, is
the Jakarta-Cikampek II
expected to be many
project contractor Elevated
conveniences that can be achieved
Toll Road
both from the author and the
e. Not counting the electrical
construction executor in
cost
Indonesia.
f. The method used to analyze
1.2. Problem Formulation the control of costs and time

2 | Journal of Construction Management Design of Jakarta-Cikampek II Elevated Toll Road Project

(P.186-P.187)
 and network in this project b. Secondary Data
research is the type of method Secondary data used in the
of Critical Path Methods, Bar preparation of this thesis is
Charts and S-Curve. data obtained from the
2. Research Methods constractor implementing,
The preparation of this task will namely PT. Waskita Karya in
use qualitative research methods, Construction Project Jakarta-
with this data collection is carried Cikampek II Elevated Toll
out by means of observation, Road. Covers :
interviews and literature studies
 Time Schedule
on all work related to the Jakarta-
 Data of workers in the
Cikampek II Elevated Toll Road
field
construction project.
 Material and equipment
2.1. Research Data
data used in the project
a. Primary Data
The primary data used during the 2.2. Research Flowchart
preparation of this thesis is the 2.3. Analysis Methods
data that the authors collect
through the process :

 Observation of conditions
and implementation in the
Jakarta-Cikampek II
Elevated Toll Road
construction project field
 Technical drawings as
planned for the
construction of the
Jakarta-Cikampek II
Elevated Toll Road
 Interviews with the
executors of the Jakarta-
Cikampek II Elevated Toll
Road project
3 | Journal of Construction Management Design of Jakarta-Cikampek II Elevated Toll Road Project
(P.186-P.187)
 In the preparation of this thesis there :𝐵𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑃𝑖𝑙𝑒 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 =
are 2 types of data that have been 0.24𝜋 𝑥 𝐷2 𝑥 ℎ
described in the previous section. The
Detail :
data will be analyzed by several
methods, first the data is analyzed to h = Depth plan (from existing surface to
determine the work network, then end bearing)
some data is analyzed to get the cost D = Bored Pile Diameter
and time for effective and efficient From the specification above we get that :
project implementation. Some of h = 44 m
these methods are, CPM (Critical D = 1200 mm = 1.2 m
Path Method), Bar Chart, S-Curve. So,
𝐵𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑃𝑖𝑙𝑒 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 =
3. Analysis and Discussion
0.25𝜋 𝑥 1.22 𝑥 44
3.1. Job Volume Calculation
= 49. 73 𝑚3
In this calculation the bored pile structure After the volume of the structure is
will be the sample. generated, then the number of volumes
can be determined for the sub-work in the
In the bored pile foundation there are
bored pile work such as :
several sub-jobs, therefore the calculation
of volume becomes very important so  Drilling Volume
that a construction implementer can
Volume of drilling work equals to h
determine the amount of material,
(depth) of bored pile from existing, and
manpower and tools needed to complete
h = 44 m’
the bored pile foundation work.

 Reinforcement work volume

All work in the field must be based on
shop drawings, so that the results of the
work will be obtained according to
planning, here is an example of shop
drawing from the bored pile foundation :

Bored Pile structure in cylindrical shop

drawings, the formula for determining the To determine the volume for
volume of the bored pile structure is reinforcement work, we need to make the
barlist that needed for bored pile
4 | Journal of Construction Management Design of Jakarta-Cikampek II Elevated Toll Road Project
(P.186-P.187)
foundation. Here is the bar list and also The calculation of admixture for 1 m3 of
bar steel volume calculation of bored concrete 30 Mpa taken from the
bored pile : Indonesian National Standart (SNI) AHSP
2012.
 Concrete Structure Volume
No Material Unit Coefficient
Concrete volume determined by reduce
Portland
the structure volume with the bar volume. 1 Kg 448
Cement
To find the bar steel volume need to
2 Sand Kg 667
divide it by the steel unit volume (=7850
Rough
Kg/m3) : 3 Kg 1000
Aggregate
𝐵𝑎𝑟 𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑙 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 (𝑚3 ) = Water (w/c
4 Ltr 215
= 0.48)
𝐵𝑎𝑟 𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑙 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 (𝐾𝑔)
7850
Table 4.3 SNI Concrete f’c 30 Mpa
3956.352 𝐾𝑔
=
7850
The data above is detailing the material
= 0.504 𝑚3 volume needed for making 1 m3 of
concrete f’c 30 Mpa.
WORK VOLUME CALCULATION

𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 (𝑚3 ) = JAKARTA CIKAMPEK II ELEVATED TOLL ROAD P.186-P.187

SPECIFICATION
DESCRIPTION COEFFICIENT UNIT DETAIL
L (m) H (m) W (m)

PRELIMINARY WORK

𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 − 𝐵𝑎𝑟 𝑆𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑙 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 SECTION.1 Trafic protection and treatment
SECTION.2 Praparation for Direction
120 - 15.00 1.00
1.00
Ls
Ls
SECTION.4 Mobilization & Demobilization 1.00 Ls
SECTION.5 Measurment & Bowplank 260.00 m'

SOIL WORKS

= 49. 73 − 0.504 SECTION.3 Preparation for work platform

SECTION.2 Excavation 0-2 m 240 1.50 1.50
1.00
540.00
Ls
m3

DRAINAGE WORK
= 49.23 𝑚3 SECTION.1 Deck Drain
+ Installing PVC Pipe
240.00
240.00
m'
m'
SECTION.2 RCP 120.00 m'
+ Installing RCP D= 800 mm 120 120.00 m'

The volume of concrete has determined STRUCTURAL WORK

SECTION.1 BORED PILE FOUNDATION WORK
+ Preparatory work for Bored Pile work 1.00 Ls

the next step is determining the volume + Drilling Work P.186 D=1,2 m
+ Drilling Work P.187 D=1,2 m
44.00
38.00
398.94
343.95
m3
m3
8 Point
8 Point
+ Re Bar Work Bored Pile P.186 ( 8 point) 41.10 31,650.82 Kg
+ Re Bar Work Bored Pile P.187 ( 8 point) 35.00 1.2 31,085.25 Kg
of material that needed to make concrete. + Concrete Cast Bored Pile P.186
+ Concrete Cast Bored Pile P.187
44.00
38.00
398.94
343.95
m3
m3
8 Point
8 Point
SECTION.2 Footing Work

Concrete grade that designed for bored + Preparatory work for Footing Work
+ Excavation for Footing P.186 13.4 3.00 7.4
1.00
297.48
Ls
m3
+ Excavation for Footing P.187 13.4 3.00 7.4 297.48 m3

pile is f’c 30 Mpa. For making concrete

+ Erection Steel Sheet Pile P.186 67.00 Bar
+ Erection Steel Sheet Pile P.187 67.00 Bar
+ Concrete Cast for LC Footing P.186 f 'c 10 Mpa 13.4 0.10 7.4 9.92 m3
+ Concrete Cast for LC Footing P.187 f 'c 10 Mpa 13.4 0.10 7.4 9.92 m3

with the grade of 30 Mpa we need a + Pile Demolition P.186 D=1,2 m

+ Pile Demolition P.187 D= 1,2 m
8.00
8.00
Point
Point
+ Formwork Installation Pile Cap P.186 11.4 2.5 5.4 84.00 m2
+ Formwork Installation Pile Cap P.187 11.4 2.5 5.4 84.00 m2
admixture calculation. + Re Bar Work Pile cap P.186 11.4 2.50 5.4 18,157.95 Kg
+ Re Bar Work Pile cap P.187 11.4 2.50 5.4 18,157.95 Kg
reduced by
+ Concrete Cast for Pile Cap P.186 f 'c 30 Mpa 11.4 2.5 5.4 151.59 m3
vol of bar
reduced by
+ Concrete Cast for Pile Cap P.187 f 'c f 'c 30 Mpa 11.4 2.5 5.4 151.59 m3
vol of bar
+ Curing Pile Cap P.186 84.00 m2
+ Curing Pile Cap P.187 84.00 m2

5 | Journal of Construction Management Design of Jakarta-Cikampek II Elevated Toll Road Project

(P.186-P.187)
 The above is an example of calculating
work volume and material for bored pile
work. In general, the volume of structural
work in this project can be determined
using the basic formulas for volume
building. The following is a table on the
calculation of the volume of work in the
Construction
Cikampek II Elevated Toll Road Project
P.186 – P.187 :
3.2. Manpower & Equipment
3.2.1. Equipment Coefficient
Tool coefficient is the time needed (in
hours) by a tool to complete or produce a
production of one unit volume of work.
The main data needed for this efficiency
calculation is:
Project of Jakarta-
Type of tool
- Production capacity

- Tool efficiency factor

WORK VOLUME CALCULATION
JAKARTA CIKAMPEK II ELEVATED TOLL ROAD P.186-P.187
SPECIFICATION
- Cycle time
DESCRIPTION COEFFICIENT UNIT DETAIL
L (m) H (m) W (m)
SECTION.3 PIER WORK
+ Preparatory Work 1.00 Ls - Equipment production capacity
+ Re Bar Work Pier P.186 2.5 9.26 3 11,645.71 Kg
+ Re Bar Work Pier P.187 2.5 9.039 3 11,539.24 Kg
+ Formwork Installation Pier P.186 108.03 m2
+ Formwork Installation Pier P.187 105.56 m2
For the purposes of the Job Unit Price
reduced by
+ Concrete Cast for Pier P.186 f 'c 30 Mpa 77.66 m3
vol of bar Analysis (JUPS) in the process of
reduced by
+ Concrete Cast for Pier P.187 f 'c 30 Mpa 75.98 m3

+ Curing Pier P.186 108.03 m2

vol of bar preparing this thesis one or more heavy
+ Curing Pier P.187 105.56 m2 equipment is needed. Each has a different
SECTION.4 PIER HEAD WORK
+ Preparatory work for Pier Head Work 1.00 Ls production capacity (Q), depending on
+ Re Bar Work Pier Head P.186 18.5 2.80 3 14,936.69 Kg
+ Re Bar Work Pier Head P.187 18.5 2.80 3 14,936.69 Kg
+ Re Bar Work Slab Line B 60 98,470.52 Kg
the type of tool, the factor of tool
+ Deck Drain (interval 4 m) 30.00 Point
+ Formwork Installation Slab Line A 342.00 m2 efficiency, tool capacity and cycle time.
+ Formwork Installation Slab Line B 342.00 m2
+ Concrete Cast Slab Line A 248.59 m3
+ Concrete Cast Slab Line B 248.59 m3
reduced by
Equipment Coefficient /m3 = 1 / Q
+ Re Bar Barrier Line A 60 23,285.79 Kg
bar vol
+ Re Bar Barrier Line B 60 23,285.79 Kg
reduced by
bar vol
(Hour)
Reduced by
+ Concrete Cast Barrier Line A 20.93 m3
bar vol
Reduced by
+ Concrete Cast Barrier Line B 20.93 m3
bar vol 3.2.2. Manpower Coefficient
+ Curing Slab Line A 60 11.5 690.00 m2
+ Curing Slab Line B 60 11.5 690.00 m2
SECTION.7 AC-WC (0.04 cm)
+ Tack Coat 60 21 441.00 liter
The use of labor in construction projects
+ AC-WC 60 0.04 21 115.92 ton
SECTION.8 FINISHING is needed to operate the equipment
+ Marking 60 360.00 M' 3 mark line

+ Lighting (interval 20 m) 60 9.00 Point

multiple
with 4 side
(operator) and complete the work that
+ Traffic Sign 61 4.00 Point
cannot be done using heavy equipment.
Coefficient calculations for labor for
work that cannot be done by heavy

6 | Journal of Construction Management Design of Jakarta-Cikampek II Elevated Toll Road Project

(P.186-P.187)
equipment are quite complex, for o Labor (Day) =((Tw x W) / Qt) / 7
example work that cannot be done by
o Labor (Hour) = (Tw x Ws) / Qt
heavy equipment is iron installation
work, installation of formwork, etc. o Labor (Day) =((Tw x Ws) / Qt) / 7
because human labor will depend on the
o Labor (Hour) = (Tw x Wh) / Qt
area of work, the origin of the worker,
and the ethos of the worker. o Labor (Day) =((Tw x Wh) / Qt) / 7

So that in the analysis of the worker o Labor (Hour) = (Tw x F) / Qt

coefficient in this thesis other than taken
Figure Error! No text of specified style in document.-1 Pile Cap Shop
from the Indonesian National Standard Drawing
o Labor (Day) =((Tw x F) / Qt) / 7
(SNI), it will also be taken from the
conditions of the Jakarta-Cikampek II Detail :
Elevated Toll Road construction project Q1 = Equipment productivity
that has been observed during the (Hour/m3/Ton,etc)
research, then input into the formula Qt = Productivity per day
compiled in Indonesian National Tw = Working time for a day (7
Standard (SNI). Hours)
W = Labor number needed
In this thesis the workforce will be
Ws = Skilled Labor needed
classified into 4 types, namely :
Wh = Chief Labor needed
- Labor F = Foreman needed
- Skilled Labor
- Chief Labor
As an example of calculation in this
- Foreman
thesis, below is a sample calculation of
The following is a formula to identify the productivity of a tool and determining
labor productivity : the coefficient for excavation work of a
pile cap structure is 2-4 m. Here are the
Productivity/hari : Qt = Tw x Q1
specifications :
Manpower Coefficient / m3,ton, etc. :

o Labor (Hour) = (Tw x W) / Qt

7 | Journal of Construction Management Design of Jakarta-Cikampek II Elevated Toll Road Project

(P.186-P.187)
Figure Error! No text of specified style in document.-2 Pile Cap
Layout
From the data above , obtained : So the calculation of excavation volume
is:

Volume = W x L x H
= 7.4 x 13.4 x 3
= 297.48 m3

EXCAVATIO FOR FOOTING (2-4 M)

NO DESCRIPTION CODE COEFFICIENT UNIT DETAIL
I ASSUMPTION
1 Using Heavy Equipment
2 Work Location : P.186 to P.187
3 Track Condition : fine
4 Effective Working Hour per-Day Tw 7.00 Hour
5 Material Development Factor Fk 1.20
II WORKING METHOD
1 The location of the land cutting is on the side of the road
2 Excavation is done using Excavators
3 Excavators move to reach land locations
4 Excavators pour material into the Dump Truck
5 Dump Truck removes the material from the excavation to the
disposal location with distance of L 15.00 Km

III USING OF EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER

1 EQUIPMENTS
1.A EXCAVATOR KOBELCO SK-200
Bucket Capacity V 0.93 m3
Bucket Factor Fb 1.00
Equipment eficiency factor Fa 0.83
Conversion factor, Depth (40% - 75%) Fv 1.00
Time cycle Ts1
- Digging T1 0.50 Minute
- Swing and Dump T2 0.25 Minute
- Setting Position T3 0.50 Minute
- Disruption T4 0.30 Minute
Time cycle = (T1+T2+T3+T4) x Fv) Ts1 1.55 Minute

Capacity of Prod./Hour = V x Fb x Fa x 60 Q1 29.88 M3/Hour

Ts1
Equipment Coeff./Hour = 1 : Q1 0.0335 Hour

1.B DUMP TRUCK

III USING OF EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER
Bed Capacity
1 EQUIPMENTS V 28.00 m3
Equipment Efficiency
1.A EXCAVATOR KOBELCOFactor
SK-200 Fa 0.83
Bucket Capacity V 0.93 m3
Loaded average speed v1 20.00 Km/h Disturbed by
Bucket Factor Fb 1.00
Empty average
Equipment speedfactor
eficiency v2
Fa 40.00
0.83 Km/h traffic jam
Conversion
Time cycle factor, Depth (40% - 75%) Fv
Ts2 1.00
Time cycle Ts1
-- Digging
Loading = (V / Q1) x 60 T1
T1 56.22 Minute
0.50 Minute
-- Swing
Loadedand
travel
Dumptime = (L / V1) x 60 T2
T2 45.00 Minute
0.25 Minute
- Setting Position T3 0.50 Minute
- Empty travel time = (L / V2) x 60 T3 22.50 Minute
W = 5.4 m - Disruption
- etc cycle
Time = (T1+T2+T3+T4) x Fv)
T4
T4
Ts1
0.30 Minute
5.00 Minute
1.55 Minute
Time cycle = ∑T Ts2 128.72 Minute
Capacity of Prod./Hour = V x Fb x Fa x 60 Q1 29.88 M3/Hour
Capacity of prod./Hour = V x Ts1
Fa x 60 Q2 9.03 M3/Hour
Equipment Coeff./Hour = D x1Fk: Q1
x Ts2 0.0335 Hour

L = 11.4 m 1.B
Equipment coeff./M3
DUMP TRUCK
DumpCapacity
Truck unit needed = (Q1 x Coeff2)
= 1 : Q2 0.1108 Hour
3.31 m3
Unit 4 Truck
Bed V 28.00
COMPLEMENTARY
Equipment TOOLS
Efficiency Factor Fa 0.83
Loaded average speed v1 20.00 Km/h Disturbed by
Need small complementary tools :
Empty average speed v2 40.00 Km/h traffic jam

H = 2.5 - Hoe cycle

Time
-- Loading
Shovel = (V / Q1) x 60
Ts2
T1 56.22 Minute Lump Sump
- Loaded travel time = (L / V1) x 60 T2 45.00 Minute
-- Empty
etc travel time = (L / V2) x 60 T3 22.50 Minute
- etc T4 5.00 Minute
Time cycle = ∑T Ts2 128.72 Minute

From the shop drawing specification, it is IV MANPOWER

Capacity of prod./Hour = V x Fa x 60
D x Fk x Ts2
Q2 9.03 M3/Hour

Productivitycoeff./M3
Equipment determines : EXCAVATOR = 1 : Q2 Q1 29.88 Hour
0.1108 M3/Hour
Dump Truck unit needed = (Q1 x Coeff2) 3.31 Unit 4 Truck

necessary to add excavation dimensions Digging Productivity/Day

COMPLEMENTARY TOOLS
Need small complementary tools :
Manpower needed
=
=
Tw x Q1 Qt 209.16 M3/Day
- Hoe
- Shovel - worker w 2.00 Man Lump Sump

that exceed the dimensions of the pile cap - etc - Foreman f 1.00 Man
IV MANPOWER
Manpower Coefficient/M3 :
structure. This aims to make work space Productivity determines : EXCAVATOR

Digging Productivity/Day
- Worker =
=
(Tw x w) / Qt
Tw x Q1
Q1

Qt
29.88 M3/Hour
0.0669 Hour
209.16 M3/Day
Manpower needed
- Foreman == (Tw x f) / Qt 0.0335 Hour
- worker w 2.00 Man
for workers. Add width (W) = 2 m, and - Foreman f 1.00 Man

Manpower Coefficient/M3 :

(L) = 2 m. depth from the existing - Worker =

- Foreman =
(Tw x w) / Qt
(Tw x f) / Qt
0.0669 Hour
0.0335 Hour

surface to the pile cap surface of 0.5 m.

So that W = 7.4 m, L = 13.4 m, H = 3 m).

8 | Journal of Construction Management Design of Jakarta-Cikampek II Elevated Toll Road Project

(P.186-P.187)
In addition to examples of calculations In determining the duration of work
from Excavatio work, below are during analysis, the duration of the work
examples of coefficient calculations for is brought closer to the real state of the
Reinforcement work: field, which was observed during the
study. The following is one example of
REINFORCEMENT WORK (PROFILED STEEL)
NO
I ASSUMPTION
DESCRIPTION CODE COEFFICIENT UNIT DETAIL
the calculation used in this thesis to plan
1 Using Manpower
2 Work Location : P.186 to P.187
3
4
Track Condition : fine
Effective working hour Tw 7.00 Hour
the duration of a job.
5 1 Kg of Steel = 1.2 Kg

II WORK METHOD
Workers are divided into several groups
Workers cut the D-diameter pole manually using a worker tool
The cut pile is lifted to the surface using a crane truck
From the data above, it is known that the
The truncated pile is loaded into the dump truck and then moved to
disposal at a distance L

III MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER

volume of pembesian work for Barrier in
MATERIAL
Steel 1.50 Kg
Wire Strand 1.50 Kg
line A is 23,285,787 Kg.
EQUIPMENT
Bar Cutter & Bar Bender V1 4.00 Kg/Minute
Bar Roller (Conventional Bender) V2 7.00 Kg/Minute
Equipment eficiency factor Fa 0.83
Production Capacity (Bar Cutter) / Hour
Production Capacity (Bar Bender) / Hour
V x Fa x 60
V x Fa x 60
Q1'
Q2'
199.20 Kg/Hour
199.20 Kg/Hour
The tool that determines the duration of
Production Capacity (Bar Roller) V2 x 60 Q3' 420.00 Kg/Hour
Equipment Needed :

- Bar Cutter = 4 Unit = 4 x Q1 Q1 796.80 Kg/Hour the work above is a bar cutter and bar
- Bar Bender = 4 Unit = 4 x Q2 Q2 796.80 Kg/Hour
- Bar Roller = 2 Unit = 2 x Q3' Q3 840.00 Kg/Hour
Equipment Coefficient
Equipment Coefficient
=
=
1 : Q1'
1 : Q2'
0.0050 Hour
0.0050 Hour
bender, as well as laborers in this case the
Equipment Coefficient = 1 : Q3' 0.0024 Hour
MAN POWER
Productivity determiner : Bar Bender
Productivity in Day = Tw x Q2
Q2
Qt
796.80 Kg/Hour
5577.60 Kg/Day
foreman, chief artisan, ironworker, and
Manpower required :
- Worker w 16.00 Man
- Tukang Besi
- Kepala Tukang
Ws
Wh
8.00 Man
4.00 Man
worker. So to determine the duration of
- Foreman f 1.00 Man
Manpower coeficient :
- Worker
- Tukang Besi
=
=
( Tw x w ) : Qt
( Tw x Ws ) : Qt
0.0201 Hour
0.0100 Hour
the data required about the value of
- Kepala Tukang = ( Tw x Wh ) : Qt 0.0050 Hour
- Foreman = ( Tw x f ) : Qt 0.0013 Hour

FOR BORED PILE REBAR WORK

coefficients per unit element associated
Productivity determiner : Bar Roller Q3 840.00 Kg/Hour
Productivity in Day = Tw x Q2 Qt 5880.00 Kg/Day
Manpower required :
- Worker w 16.00 Man
with the work mentioned above.
- Tukang Besi Ws 8.00 Man
- Kepala Tukang Wh 4.00 Man
- Foreman f 1.00 Man
Manpower coeficient :
- Worker
- Tukang Besi
=
=
( Tw x w ) : Qt
( Tw x Ws ) : Qt
0.0190 Hour
0.0095 Hour
Below is a calculation of productivity,
- Kepala Tukang = ( Tw x Wh ) : Qt 0.0048 Hour
- Foreman = ( Tw x f ) : Qt 0.0012 Hour
and the coefficient value of the elements
BAR INSTALLATION related to the work mentioned above:
1 BAR INSTALLATION PILE CAP
Volume (Specification) V 18157.95 Kg
Implemented Duration (Site Condition) D 5 Day
Labor involved (Site Condition) W 11
- Labor (Site Condition) w 6 Man
- Skilled Labor (Site Condition) tw 2 Man
- Chief Labor (Site Condition) tw 1 Man
- Foreman (Site Condition) m 1 Man
EQUIPMENT
Bar Cutter & Bar Bender V1 4.00 Kg/Minute
Bar Roller (Conventional Bender) V2 7.00 Kg/Minute
Productivity Kg/Day = V Q 3631.589 Kg/Day Equipment eficiency factor Fa 0.83
D Production Capacity (Bar Cutter) / Hour V x Fa x 60 Q1' 199.20 Kg/Hour
Coefficient of Manpower Production Capacity (Bar Bender) / Hour V x Fa x 60 Q2' 199.20 Kg/Hour
Equipment Needed :
- Labor 6 Man = 6:Q 0.001652 MD
- Skilled Labor 2 Man = 2:Q 0.000551 MD - Bar Cutter = 4 Unit = 4 x Q1 Q1 796.80 Kg/Hour
- Chief Labor 1 Man = 1:Q 0.000275 MD - Bar Bender = 4 Unit = 4 x Q2 Q2 796.80 Kg/Hour
- Foreman 1 Man = 1:Q 0.000275 MD Equipment Coefficient = 1 : Q1' 0.0050 Hour
Equipment Coefficient = 1 : Q2' 0.0050 Hour

3.2.3. Duration Calculation

9 | Journal of Construction Management Design of Jakarta-Cikampek II Elevated Toll Road Project

(P.186-P.187)
From the above data obtained 3.2.5. Budget Plan
productivity data Bar Bender tool and
BUDGET PLAN

Cutter Bar per hour. The coefficient of DESCRIPTION

JAKARTA CIKAMPEK II ELEVATED TOLL ROAD P.186-P.187
SPECIFICATION
COEFFICIENT UNIT DETAIL UNIT PRICE NOMINAL PRICE
L (m) H (m) W (m)
PRELIMINARY WORK

labor is : SECTION.1 Trafic protection and treatment

+ Install and Uninstall MCB and Panel
+ Petugas kebersihan jalan
120
120
120
-
-
-
15.00
15.00
15.00
1.00 Ls Rp 2,831,710,274.00 Rp 2,831,710,274.00

SECTION.2 Praparation for Direction 1.00 Ls

+ Land clearing for office 20 15.00 300.00 m2 Rp 19,644.99 Rp 5,893,497.00
+ Site office / Director's set 20 15.00 300.00 m2 Rp 726,601.94 Rp 217,980,583.33
+ Concrete cast for office area f 'c 10 Mpa 20 0.10 15.00 30.00 m3 Rp 885,656.92 Rp 26,569,707.71

So to determine the duration, the number + Sanitation & Electricity installation

SECTION.4 Mobilization & Demobilization
SECTION.5 Measurment & Bowplank
1.00
1.00
260.00
Ls
Ls
m'
Rp
Rp
Rp
4,415,655.00
3,001,500,000.00 Rp
74,767.25 Rp
Rp 4,415,655.00
3,001,500,000.00
19,439,485.00
SOIL WORKS

of tools and labor needed to complete the SECTION.3 Preparation for work platform
+ Clearing, Stripping, and Grubbing
+ Land filling and Compaction
120
120 0.40
10.00
10.00
1.00
1,200.00
480.00
Ls
m2
m3
Rp
Rp
19,644.99 Rp
36,794.46 Rp
23,573,988.00
17,661,339.87
SECTION.2 Excavation 0-2 m 240 1.50 1.50 540.00 m3 Rp 74,706.80 Rp 40,341,674.69
DRAINAGE WORK

work are as follows: SECTION.1 Deck Drain

+ Installing PVC Pipe 240.00 m' Rp 161,303.49 Rp 38,712,836.40
SECTION.2 RCP
+ Installing RCP D= 800 mm 120 120.00 m' Rp 1,223,987.37 Rp 146,878,484.76
STRUCTURAL WORK
SECTION.1 BORED PILE FOUNDATION WORK
BARRIER STRUCTURE + Drilling Work P.186 D=1,2 m
- Bored Pile Drilling D=1,2 m | P.186a 44.00 49.78 m' Rp 151,479.37 Rp 6,665,092.39
1 REINFORCEMENT - Bored Pile Drilling D=1,2 m | P.186b 44.30 50.12 m' Rp 151,479.37 Rp 6,710,536.20
- Bored Pile Drilling D=1,2 m | P.186c 44.00 49.78 m' Rp 151,479.37 Rp 6,665,092.39
VOLUME = 23,286 Kg
- Bored Pile Drilling D=1,2 m | P.186d 44.00 49.78 m' 8 Point Rp 151,479.37 Rp 6,665,092.39
- Pekerja 0.0014 MD 33 17 - Bored Pile Drilling D=1,2 m | P.186e 44.00 49.78 m' Rp 151,479.37 Rp 6,665,092.39
- Bored Pile Drilling D=1,2 m | P.186f 44.00 49.78 m' Rp 151,479.37 Rp 6,665,092.39
- Tukang Besi 0.0007 MD 17 8 - Bored Pile Drilling D=1,2 m | P.186g 44.00 49.78 m' Rp 151,479.37 Rp 6,665,092.39
- Chief Labor Besi 0.0004 MD 8 4 - Bored Pile Drilling D=1,2 m | P.186h 44.30 50.12 m' Rp 151,479.37 Rp 6,710,536.20
352.60 m'
- Foreman 0.0001 MD 2 1 + Drilling Work P.187 D=1,2 m
- Bored Pile Drilling D=1,2 m | P.187a 38.00 42.99 m' Rp 151,479.37 Rp 5,756,216.15
EQUIPMENT
- Bar Cutter 0.0050 Hour 116
2 8
- Bored Pile Drilling D=1,2 m | P.187b
- Bored Pile Drilling D=1,2 m | P.187c
38.00
38.00
42.99
42.99
m'
m'
Rp
Rp
151,479.37
151,479.37
Rp
Rp
5,756,216.15
5,756,216.15
- Bored Pile Drilling D=1,2 m | P.187d 38.00 42.99 m' Rp 151,479.37 Rp 5,756,216.15
- Bar Bender 0.0050 Hour 116 8 - Bored Pile Drilling D=1,2 m | P.187e 38.00 42.99 m' Rp 151,479.37 Rp 5,756,216.15
- Bored Pile Drilling D=1,2 m | P.187f 38.00 42.99 m' Rp 151,479.37 Rp 5,756,216.15
- Truck Crane 0.0006 Hour 15 1
- Bored Pile Drilling D=1,2 m | P.187g 38.00 42.99 m' Rp 151,479.37 Rp 5,756,216.15
MATERIAL - Bored Pile Drilling D=1,2 m | P.187h 38.00 42.99 m' Rp 151,479.37 Rp 5,756,216.15
304.00 m'
- Bar Steel 1.5000 Kg 34929 17500 + Drilling Material Removing 742.90 m3 Rp 358,623.74 Rp 266,420,141.00
+ Re Bar Work Bored Pile P.186 ( 8 point) 41.10 31,650.82 Kg
Bar Type L QTY Total Weight Total x 8 Point
- Main Bar (A) D25 12 28.00 1,293.60 10,348.80 Kg Rp 30,214.46 Rp 312,683,401.29
- Main Bar (B) D25 4 28.00 431.20 3,449.60 Kg Rp 30,214.46 Rp 104,227,800.43
- Main Bar (C) D16 12 28.00 530.88 4,247.04 Kg Rp 30,214.46 Rp 128,322,019.23
- Main Bar (D) D16 12 28.00 530.88 4,247.04 Kg Rp 30,214.46 Rp 128,322,019.23

3.2.4. Job Unit Price - Main Bar (E ) D16

- Spiral (F) D13
5.2
12
28.00
38.00
230.05
474.24
1,840.38
3,793.92
Kg
Kg
Rp
Rp
30,214.46
30,214.46
Rp
Rp
55,606,208.33
114,631,243.22
- Spiral (G) D13 12 36.00 449.28 3,594.24 Kg Rp 30,214.46 Rp 108,598,019.89
- Spacer (H) D13 0.3 52.00 16.22 129.79 Kg Rp 30,214.46 Rp 3,921,595.16
Total = 3,956.35 31,650.82 Kg

+ Re Bar Work Bored Pile P.187 ( 8 point) 35.00 1.2 31,085.25 Kg

The coefficient of labor, material and - Main Bar (A) D25

- Main Bar (B) D25
Bar Type L
12
6
QTY
28.00
28.00
Total Weight Total x 8 Point
1,293.60
646.80
10,348.80
5,174.40
Kg
Kg
Rp
Rp
30,214.46
30,214.46
Rp
Rp
312,683,401.29
156,341,700.64
- Main Bar (C) D16 12 28.00 530.88 4,247.04 Kg Rp 30,214.46 Rp 128,322,019.23
- Main Bar (D) D16 8.5 28.00 376.04 3,008.32 Kg Rp 30,214.46 Rp 90,894,763.62

tools in certain work units is calculated - Spiral (F) D13

- Spiral (G) D13
- Spacer (H) D13
12
12
0.3
43.00
39.00
48.00
536.64
486.72
14.98
4,293.12
3,893.76
119.81
Kg
Kg
Kg
Rp
Rp
Rp
30,214.46
30,214.46
30,214.46
Rp
Rp
Rp
129,714,301.54
117,647,854.88
3,619,934.00
Project Jakarta-Cikampek II Elevated Toll Road P.186-P.187 Total = 3,885.66 31,085.25 Kg
Work Kind RCP Installation + Concrete Cast Bored Pile P.186 44.00 398.94 m3 8 Point

against per unit volume in the unit of

Payment Unit

NO COMPONENT
M'

UNIT COEFFICIENT UNIT PRICE (IDR) COST (IDR)

- Concrete Cast Bored Pile P.186a D=1,2 m
- Concrete Cast Bored Pile P.186b D=1,2 m
- Concrete Cast Bored Pile P.186c D=1,2 m
44.00
44.30
44.00
49.78
50.12
49.78
m3
m3
m3
Rp
Rp
Rp
1,184,331.88
1,184,331.88
1,184,331.88
Rp
Rp
Rp
58,959,424.89
59,361,420.97
58,959,424.89
- Concrete Cast Bored Pile P.186d D=1,2 m 44.00 49.78 m3 Rp 1,184,331.88 Rp 58,959,424.89
A MATERIAL - Concrete Cast Bored Pile P.186e D=1,2 m 44.00 49.78 m3 Rp 1,184,331.88 Rp 58,959,424.89

payment to get the price of the work in a

1 RCP (Type-1) Unit 0.8000 IDR 1,267,200.00
TOTAL COST OF MATERIAL
IDR 1,013,760.00
IDR 1,013,760.00
- Concrete Cast Bored Pile P.186f D=1,2 m
- Concrete Cast Bored Pile P.186g D=1,2 m
- Concrete Cast Bored Pile P.186h D=1,2 m
44.00
44.00
44.30
49.78
49.78
50.12
m3
m3
m3
Rp
Rp
Rp
1,184,331.88
1,184,331.88
1,184,331.88
Rp
Rp
Rp
58,959,424.89
58,959,424.89
59,361,420.97
B MANPOWER Total = 398.94 m3
1 labor MD 0.0357 IDR 85,500.00 IDR 3,052.35
certain unit as well.
2
2
Skilled Labor
Foreman
MD
MD
0.0179
0.0089
IDR 107,400.00
IDR 198,000.00
IDR 1,922.46
IDR 1,762.20
+ Concrete Cast Bored Pile P.187
- Concrete Cast Bored Pile P.187a D=1,2 m
- Concrete Cast Bored Pile P.187b D=1,2 m
38.00
38.00
38.00
343.95
42.99
42.99
m3
m3
m3
8 Point
Rp
Rp
1,184,331.88
1,184,331.88
Rp
Rp
50,919,503.32
50,919,503.32
TOTAL COST OF MANPOWER IDR 6,737.01 - Concrete Cast Bored Pile P.187c D=1,2 m 38.00 42.99 m3 Rp 1,184,331.88 Rp 50,919,503.32
C EQUIPMENT - Concrete Cast Bored Pile P.187d D=1,2 m 38.00 42.99 m3 Rp 1,184,331.88 Rp 50,919,503.32
1 Flatbed Truck Hour 0.1230 IDR 275,120.62 IDR 33,839.84 - Concrete Cast Bored Pile P.187e D=1,2 m 38.00 42.99 m3 Rp 1,184,331.88 Rp 50,919,503.32
2 Hoe - Concrete Cast Bored Pile P.187f D=1,2 m 38.00 42.99 m3 Rp 1,184,331.88 Rp 50,919,503.32
Ls 1.0000 IDR 10,000.00 IDR 10,000.00
Here is the example :
3 Shovel,etc
TOTAL COST OF EQUIPMENT IDR 43,839.84
- Concrete Cast Bored Pile P.187g D=1,2 m
- Concrete Cast Bored Pile P.187h D=1,2 m
SECTION.4 PIER HEAD WORK
38.00
38.00
42.99
42.99
m3
m3
Rp
Rp
1,184,331.88
1,184,331.88
Rp
Rp
50,919,503.32
50,919,503.32

+ Re Bar Work Pier Head P.186 14,936.69 Kg Rp 31,842.37 Rp 475,619,799.14

D Total cost of Material, Manpower and Equipment ( A + B + C ) IDR 1,064,336.85 Rp 31,842.37 Rp 475,619,799.14
+ Re Bar Work Pier Head P.187 14,936.69 Kg
E Overhead & profit ( 15% X D ) IDR 159,650.53
+ Shoring Installation Pier Head P.186 1,003.29 m3 Rp 152,832.30 Rp 153,335,299.16
F Job unit price ( D + E ) IDR 1,223,987.37
+ Shoring Installation Pier Head P.187 978.92 m3 Rp 152,832.30 Rp 149,611,158.15
+ Formwork Installation Pier Head P.186 139.87 m2 Rp 187,630.08 Rp 26,242,880.93
Project Jakarta-Cikampek II Elevated Toll Road P.186-P.187
+ Formwork Installation Pier Head P.187 139.87 m2 Rp 187,630.08 Rp 26,242,880.93
Work Kind Drilling Using SR 60
+ Concrete Cast Pier Head P.186 f 'c 30 Mpa 116.53 m3 Rp 1,329,532.36 Rp 154,932,927.93
Payment Unit M'
+ Concrete Cast Pier Head P.187 f 'c 30 Mpa 118.40 m3 Rp 1,329,532.36 Rp 157,421,838.94
NO COMPONENT UNIT COEFFICIENT UNIT PRICE (IDR) COST (IDR) + Curing Pier Head P.186 139.87 m2 Rp 7,468.96 Rp 1,044,646.44
+ Curing Pier Head P.187 139.87 m2 Rp 7,468.96 Rp 1,044,646.44
A MATERIAL
+ Sosrobahu Work P.186-P.187 2.00 Point Rp 63,370,737.14 Rp 63,370,737.14
TOTAL COST OF MATERIAL
+ PC Strand Procurement 1.00 Ton Rp 12,483,000.00 Rp 12,483,000.00
B MANPOWER
+ Temporary Bearing 8.00 Point Rp 1,521,335.00 Rp 12,170,680.00
1 labor MD 0.0777 IDR 85,500.00 IDR 6,647.23
TOTAL Rp 1,709,140,294.34
2 Foreman MD 0.0130 IDR 198,000.00 IDR 2,565.51
TOTAL COST OF MANPOWER SECTION.5 SBG (Steel Box Girder) Work
IDR 9,212.74
+ Erection SBG 4.00 Point Rp 2,437,962,674.45 Rp 9,751,850,697.80
C EQUIPMENT
1 Drill Machine SR60 Hour 0.0907 IDR 699,814.55 IDR 63,473.18 + Installing SBG Diaphragm 14.00 Point Rp 1,417,506.21 Rp 19,845,086.87
2 Service Crane (Crawler) Hour 0.0907 IDR 300,000.00 IDR 27,210.00 TOTAL Rp 9,771,695,784.67
3 Water Tank Truck Hour 0.0907 IDR 240,631.41 IDR 21,825.27 SECTION.6 SLAB WORK 1.00 Ls
4 Hoe + Scaffolding Installation for Slab 1.9 m 20.00 Unit 535,000.00 10,700,000.00
Ls 1.0000 IDR 10,000.00 IDR 10,000.00
5 Shovel,etc + Installing Bondex Line A 270.00 m2 221,331.56 59,759,520.00
TOTAL COST OF EQUIPMENT IDR 122,508.45 + Installing Bondex Line B 270.00 m2 221,331.56 59,759,520.00
+ Re Bar Work Slab Line A 98,470.52 Kg 33,637.66 3,312,317,613.41
D Total cost of Material, Manpower and Equipment ( A + B + C ) IDR 131,721.19 + Re Bar Work Slab Line B 98,470.52 Kg 33,637.66 3,312,317,613.41
E Overhead & profit ( 15% X D ) IDR 19,758.18 + S-Form 1.00 Ls 210,124,967.63 210,124,967.63
F Job unit price ( D + E ) IDR 151,479.37 + Concrete Cast Slab Line A 248.59 m3 1,324,126.83 329,160,695.29
+ Concrete Cast Slab Line B 248.59 m3 1,324,126.83 329,160,695.29
Project Jakarta-Cikampek II Elevated Toll Road P.186-P.187 + Re Bar Barrier Line A 23,285.79 Kg 29,873.77 695,634,244.61
Work Kind Drilling Material Removing
Payment Unit M3 + Re Bar Barrier Line B 23,285.79 Kg 29,873.77 695,634,244.61

NO COMPONENT UNIT COEFFICIENT UNIT PRICE (IDR) COST (IDR) + Barrier Formwork 624.00 m2 236,442.21 147,539,940.00
+ Concrete Cast Barrier Line A 20.93 m3 Rp 1,154,049.21 Rp 24,156,248.19
A MATERIAL
TOTAL COST OF MATERIAL + Concrete Cast Barrier Line B 20.93 m3 Rp 1,154,049.21 Rp 24,156,248.19
B MANPOWER
+ Curing Slab Line A 690.00 m2 Rp 7,468.96 Rp 5,153,584.13
1 labor MD 0.0777 IDR 85,500.00 IDR 6,647.23
+ Curing Slab Line B 690.00 m2 Rp 7,468.96 Rp 5,153,584.13
2 Foreman MD 0.0144 IDR 198,000.00 IDR 2,851.20
+ Curing Barrier Line A 312.00 m2 Rp 7,468.96 Rp 2,330,316.30
TOTAL COST OF MANPOWER IDR 9,498.43
+ Curing Barrier Line B 312.00 m2 Rp 7,468.96 Rp 2,330,316.30
C EQUIPMENT
1 Excavator Hour 0.1009 IDR 399,995.71 IDR 40,359.57 TOTAL Rp 9,225,389,351.49
2 Dump Truck Hour 0.7799 IDR 323,103.90 IDR 251,988.73 SECTION.7 AC-WC (0.04 cm)
3 Hoe + Tack Coat 441.00 liter 22,036.50 9,718,096.55
Ls 1.0000 IDR 10,000.00 IDR 10,000.00 856,693.51 99,307,911.79
4 Shovel,etc + AC-WC 115.92 ton
TOTAL COST OF EQUIPMENT IDR 302,348.30 TOTAL Rp 109,026,008.34
SECTION.8 FINISHING
D Total cost of Material, Manpower and Equipment ( A + B + C ) IDR 311,846.73 + Marking 360.00 M' Rp 344,301.52 Rp 123,948,547.42
E Overhead & profit ( 15% X D ) IDR 46,777.01 + Lighting (interval 20 m) 9.00 Point Rp 5,691,392.02 Rp 51,222,528.19
F Job unit price ( D + E ) IDR 358,623.74
+ Traffic Sign 4.00 Point Rp 1,638,835.89 Rp 6,555,343.56
TOTAL Rp 181,726,419.17

TOTAL COST RP 33,821,983,227.07

10 | Journal of Construction Management Design of Jakarta-Cikampek II Elevated Toll Road

Project (P.186-P.187)
3.2.6. Network Analysis 1. CPM (Critical Path Method)
From the duration data calculated in the A. Acticity Table
previous section, the next step is to
determine the network. The method of
IMMEDIATE
determining the network in this NO DESCRIPTION NODE
PREDECESSOR
DURATION

preparation is using the CPM (Critical 1 GENERAL WORK -

Traffic Protection and Treatment
Path Method) method. An explanation of Mob and Demob
2 PRELIMINARY WORK -

the CPM (Critical Path Method) has been Measurement & Bowplank
Site Office
A
B
-
A
2
18
3 SOIL WORK
described in the previous chapter. Site Clearing, Stripping & Grubbing C A 9
Land Filling & Compaction D B,C 1
Before forming a CPM diagram, what Excavation 0-2 m E A 2
4 BORED PILE FOUNDATION

must be done first is to determine the list Drilling F D,E 10

Reinforcement Work G D,E 12
Material Removing H F 10
of jobs to be analyzed along with the Concrete Structure I F,G 4
5 PILE CAP WORK
immediate predecessor. In this thesis, SSP Driving J H,I 4
Footing Excavation ( 2-4 m) K J 4
network analysis will be carried out Pile Demolition L K 6
Reinforcement Work M K 20
Formwork Installation N L,M 2
specifically and general. Specifically, a Concrete Cast + Waiting Time O N 6
Curing P O 14
network analysis will be carried out on 6 PIER WORK
Reinforcement Work Q O 10
each job, the results of this calculation Scaffolding + Climbing Platform Instl. R P 6
Formwork Installation S Q,R 6

are recommended as a reference for the Concrete Cast + Waiting Time

7 Curing
PIER HEAD
T
U
S
T
6
14
Shoring Installation V U 2
implementation method in the field. The Formwork Installation W V 10
Sosrobahu Tool Installation X W 10

following are jobs that are included in the Reinforcement Work

Concrete Cast + Waiting Time
Y
Z
U
W,X,Y
22
6
Curing AA Z 14
analysis of specific work networks : Erection + Stresssing Tendon AC AA 2
Pedestal + Temporary Bearing Instl. AD AA 2

1. Bored Pile Uninstalling Formwork+Shoring AB AC,AD 7

8 STEEEL BOX GIRDER
2. Pile Cap SBG Mobilization AE AB 1
Erection AF AB 1
3. Pier Diaphragm Installation AG AE,AF 6
9 SLAB
4. Pier Head Reinforcement Work AH AE,AF 46
S-Form Installation AI AG 17
5. Slab Deck Drain AJ AG 2
Concrete Structure AK AH,AI,AJ 3
Curing AL AK 7
Then in general the analysis of the Moving S-Form AM AL 2
10 BARRIER STURCTURE
network will be carried out covering all Formwork Installation AN AL 2
Concrete Structure AO AN 3
Curing AP AO 7
jobs except public works. Here is the type 11 DRAINAGE
Excavation 0-2 m AQ AM 2
of work : RC Pipe Installation AR AQ 2
12 FINISHING AS AP 5

1. Preliminary Track Line Marking

AC-WC
2. Drainage Public Road Lighting

3. Structure
4. Finishing

11 | Journal of Construction Management Design of Jakarta-Cikampek II Elevated Toll Road

Project (P.186-P.187)
B. CPM Diagram 6+14+22+6+14+2+7+1+46+3+7+2+3+7
+5 = 248 Days
IMMEDIATE CRITICAL SLACK
NO DESCRIPTION NODE DURATION ES LS EF LF
PREDECESSOR PATH TIME

1 GENERAL WORK -
Traffic Protection and Treatment
Mob and Demob
2 PRELIMINARY WORK -
Measurement & Bowplank A - 2 Yes 0 0 2 2 0
Site Office B A 18 Yes 2 2 20 20 0
3 SOIL WORK 0
Site Clearing, Stripping & Grubbing C A 9 No 2 11 11 20 18
Land Filling & Compaction D B,C 1 Yes 20 20 21 21 0
Excavation 0-2 m E A 2 No 2 4 19 21 4
4 BORED PILE FOUNDATION
Drilling F D,E 10 Yes 21 21 31 31 0
Reinforcement Work G D,E 12 No 21 33 25 37 24
Material Removing H F 10 Yes 31 31 41 41 0
Concrete Structure I F,G 4 No 33 37 37 41 8
5 PILE CAP WORK 0
SSP Driving J H,I 4 Yes 41 41 45 45 0
Footing Excavation ( 2-4 m) K J 4 Yes 45 45 49 49 0
Pile Demolition L K 6 No 49 63 55 69 28
Reinforcement Work M K 20 Yes 49 49 69 69 0
Formwork Installation N L,M 2 Yes 69 69 71 71 0
Concrete Cast + Waiting Time O N 6 Yes 71 71 77 77 0
Curing P O 14 Yes 77 77 91 91 0
6 PIER WORK 0
Reinforcement Work Q O 10 No 77 87 87 97 20
Scaffolding + Climbing Platform Instl. R P 6 Yes 91 91 97 97 0
Formwork Installation S Q,R 6 Yes 97 97 103 103 0
Concrete Cast + Waiting Time T S 6 Yes 103 103 109 109 0
Curing U T 14 Yes 109 109 123 123 0
7 PIER HEAD 0
Shoring Installation V U 2 No 123 123 125 125 0
Formwork Installation W V 10 No 125 125 135 135 0
Sosrobahu Tool Installation X W 10 No 135 135 145 145 0
Reinforcement Work Y U 22 Yes 123 123 145 145 0
Concrete Cast + Waiting Time Z W,X,Y 6 Yes 145 145 151 151 0
Curing AA Z 14 Yes 151 151 165 165 0
Erection + Stresssing Tendon AC AA 2 Yes 165 165 167 167 0
Pedestal + Temporary Bearing Instl. AD AA 2 No 165 167 165 167 4
Uninstalling Formwork+Shoring AB AC,AD 7 Yes 167 167 174 174 0
8 STEEEL BOX GIRDER 0
SBG Mobilization AE AB 1 No 174 174 175 175 0
Erection AF AB 1 Yes 174 174 175 175 0
Diaphragm Installation AG AE,AF 6 No 175 198 181 204 46
9 SLAB 0
Reinforcement Work AH AE,AF 46 Yes 175 175 221 221 0
S-Form Installation AI AG 17 No 181 204 198 221 46
Deck Drain AJ AG 2 No 181 219 183 221 76
Concrete Structure AK AH,AI,AJ 3 Yes 221 221 224 224 0
Curing AL AK 7 Yes 224 224 231 231 0
Moving S-Form AM AL 2 No 231 242 233 244 22
10 BARRIER STURCTURE 0
Formwork Installation AN AL 2 Yes 231 231 233 233 0
Concrete Structure AO AN 3 Yes 233 233 236 236 0
Curing AP AO 7 Yes 236 236 243 243 0
11 DRAINAGE 0

C. Critical Path Identification Excavation 0-2 m

RC Pipe Installation
AQ
AR
AM
AQ
2
2
No
No
233 244 235 246
235 246 237 288
22
62
12 FINISHING AS AP 5 Yes 243 243 248 248 0
Track Line Marking
AC-WC

From the CPM diagram in point B, the Public Road Lighting

The duration will be the optimum

data regarding the duration of the work
included in the analysis of the general
CPM network is 248 days without the
addition of the duration of the project's
general work. And paths have several
critical paths, but the critical path chosen
is as follows :
duration of the project if it has been
added to the duration of public works
carried out throughout the project and
begins 6 days before the preliminary
work is carried out. So if you want to get

Critical Path : the optimum duration, then the duration

of the results of the general CPM analysis
A-B-D-F-H-J-K-M-N-O-P-R-S-T-U-Y-
Z-AA-AC-AB-AF-AH-AK-AL-AN-AO- is summed by 6 days (the distance from
AP-AS the start of public works to the start of the

Duration : preliminary work).

2+18+1+10+10+4+4+20+2+6+14+6+6+
Optimum Duration = 248 + 6 = 254 Days

12 | Journal of Construction Management Design of Jakarta-Cikampek II Elevated Toll Road

Project (P.186-P.187)
 GENERAL PROJECT ACTIVITY WEEKLY GANTT CHART
JANUARRY FEBRUARRY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULLY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER
IMMEDI
ATE DURATI CRITICAL SLACK START
NO DESCRIPTION NODE ES LS EF LF END DATE
PREDEC ON PATH TIME DATE
ESSOR

2-Jul-18
9-Jul-18

1-Jan-18
8-Jan-18
4-Jun-18

5-Feb-18
2-Apr-18
9-Apr-18
3-Sep-18
1-Oct-18
8-Oct-18

16-Jul-18
23-Jul-18
30-Jul-18
6-Aug-18

5-Mar-18

15-Jan-18
22-Jan-18
29-Jan-18
7-May-18
11-Jun-18
18-Jun-18
25-Jun-18

12-Feb-18
19-Feb-18
26-Feb-18
16-Apr-18
23-Apr-18
30-Apr-18
10-Sep-18
17-Sep-18
24-Sep-18
15-Oct-18
22-Oct-18

13-Aug-18
20-Aug-18
27-Aug-18

12-Mar-18
19-Mar-18
26-Mar-18
14-May-18
21-May-18
28-May-18
1 GENERAL WORK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43
Traffic Protection and Treatment 01-Jan-18 23-Oct-18
Mob and Demob 01-Jan-18 23-Oct-18
2 PRELIMINARY WORK -
Measurement & Bowplank A - 2.00 Yes 0 0 2 2 0 08-Jan-18 09-Jan-18
Site Office B A 18.00 Yes 2 2 20 20 0 10-Jan-18 30-Jan-18
3 SOIL WORK ` 0
Site Clearing, Stripping & Grubbing C A 9.00 No 2 11 11 20 18 10-Jan-18 19-Jan-18
Land Filling & Compaction D B,C 1.00 Yes 20 20 21 21 0 31-Jan-18 31-Jan-18
Excavation 0-2 m E A 2.00 No 2 4 19 21 4 10-Jan-18 11-Jan-18
4 BORED PILE FOUNDATION
Drilling F D,E 10.00 Yes 21 21 31 31 0 01-Feb-18 12-Feb-18
Reinforcement Work G D,E 12.00 No 21 33 25 37 24 01-Feb-18 14-Feb-18
Material Removing H F 10.00 Yes 31 31 41 41 0 13-Feb-18 23-Feb-18
Concrete Structure I F,G 4.00 No 33 37 37 41 8 15-Feb-18 19-Feb-18
5 PILE CAP WORK 0
SSP Driving J H,I 4.00 Yes 41 41 45 45 0 24-Feb-18 28-Feb-18
Footing Excavation ( 2-4 m) K J 4.00 Yes 45 45 49 49 0 01-Mar-18 05-Mar-18
Pile Demolition L K 6.00 No 49 63 55 69 28 06-Mar-18 12-Mar-18
Reinforcement Work M K 20.00 Yes 49 49 69 69 0 06-Mar-18 28-Mar-18
Formwork Installation N L,M 2.00 Yes 69 69 71 71 0 29-Mar-18 30-Mar-18
Concrete Cast + Waiting Time O N 6.00 Yes 71 71 77 77 0 31-Mar-18 06-Apr-18
Curing P O 14.00 Yes 77 77 91 91 0 07-Apr-18 23-Apr-18
6 PIER WORK 0
Reinforcement Work Q O 10.00 No 77 87 87 97 20 07-Apr-18 18-Apr-18
Scaffolding + Climbing Platform Instl. R P 6.00 Yes 91 91 97 97 0 24-Apr-18 30-Apr-18
Formwork Installation S Q,R 6.00 Yes 97 97 103 103 0 01-May-18 07-May-18
2. Gantt Chart

Concrete Cast + Waiting Time T S 6.00 Yes 103 103 109 109 0 08-May-18 14-May-18
Curing U T 14.00 Yes 109 109 123 123 0 15-May-18 30-May-18
7 PEKERJAAN PIER HEAD 0
Shoring Installation V U 2.00 No 123 123 125 125 0 31-May-18 01-Jun-18
Formwork Installation W V 10.00 No 125 125 135 135 0 02-Jun-18 13-Jun-18
Sosrobahu Tool Installation X W 10.00 No 135 135 145 145 0 14-Jun-18 25-Jun-18
Reinforcement Work Y U 22.00 Yes 123 123 145 145 0 31-May-18 25-Jun-18
Concrete Cast + Waiting Time Z W,X,Y 6.00 Yes 145 145 151 151 0 26-Jun-18 02-Jul-18
Curing AA Z 14.00 Yes 151 151 165 165 0 03-Jul-18 18-Jul-18
Erection + Stresssing Tendon AC AA 2.00 Yes 165 165 167 167 0 19-Jul-18 20-Jul-18
Pedestal + Temporary Bearing Instl. AD AA 2.00 No 165 167 165 167 4 19-Jul-18 20-Jul-18
Uninstalling Formwork+Shoring AB AC,AD 7.00 Yes 167 167 174 174 0 21-Jul-18 29-Jul-18
8 STEEEL BOX GIRDER 0
SBG Mobilization AE AB 1.00 No 174 174 175 175 0 30-Jul-18 30-Jul-18
Erection AF AB 1.00 Yes 174 174 175 175 0 30-Jul-18 30-Jul-18
Diaphragm Installation AG AE,AF 6.00 No 175 198 181 204 46 31-Jul-18 06-Aug-18
9 SLAB 0
Reinforcement Work AH AE,AF 46.00 Yes 175 175 221 221 0 31-Jul-18 21-Sep-18
S-Form Installation AI AG 17.00 No 181 204 198 221 46 07-Aug-18 26-Aug-18
Deck Drain AJ AG 2.00 No 181 219 183 221 76 07-Aug-18 08-Aug-18
Concrete Structure AK AH,AI,AJ 3.00 Yes 221 221 224 224 0 22-Sep-18 25-Sep-18
Curing AL AK 7.00 Yes 224 224 231 231 0 26-Sep-18 03-Oct-18
Moving S-Form AM AL 2.00 No 231 242 233 244 22 04-Oct-18 05-Oct-18
10 BARRIER STURCTURE 0
Formwork Installation AN AL 2.00 Yes 231 231 233 233 0 04-Oct-18 05-Oct-18
Concrete Structure AO AN 3.00 Yes 233 233 236 236 0 06-Oct-18 09-Oct-18
Curing AP AO 7.00 Yes 236 236 243 243 0 10-Oct-18 17-Oct-18
11 DRAINAGE 0
Excavation 0-2 m AQ AM 2.00 No 233 244 235 246 22 06-Oct-18 08-Oct-18
RC Pipe Installation AR AQ 2.00 No 235 246 237 288 62 09-Oct-18 10-Oct-18
12 FINISHING AS AP 5.00 Yes 243 243 248 248 0 18-Oct-18 23-Oct-18
Track Line Marking
AC-WC
Public Road Lighting
WEEKLY TOTAL DURATION 43

MASTER SCHEDULE
WEEKLY S-CURVE
CONCTRUCTION PROJECT OF JAKARTA - CIKAMPEK II ELEVATED TOLL ROAD
ZONE - 5 (P.186 - P.187)
2018
JANUARRY FEBRUARRY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULLY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OKTOBER
4.964 1.227 1.936 0.497 1.915 1.472 18.111 3.666 1.815 0.831
PRECENTA

FINISHING
NO DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT PRICE COEFFICIENT NOMINAL PRICE
GE (%)

SOIL WORKS
2-Jul-18
9-Jul-18

1-Jan-18
8-Jan-18
4-Jun-18

5-Feb-18
2-Apr-18
9-Apr-18
3-Sep-18
1-Oct-18
8-Oct-18

16-Jul-18
23-Jul-18
30-Jul-18
6-Aug-18

5-Mar-18

15-Jan-18
22-Jan-18
29-Jan-18
7-May-18
11-Jun-18
18-Jun-18
25-Jun-18

12-Feb-18
19-Feb-18
26-Feb-18
16-Apr-18
23-Apr-18
30-Apr-18
10-Sep-18
17-Sep-18
24-Sep-18
15-Oct-18
22-Oct-18

13-Aug-18
20-Aug-18
27-Aug-18

12-Mar-18
19-Mar-18
26-Mar-18
14-May-18
21-May-18
28-May-18

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

DRAINAGE WORK
STRUCTURAL WORK
1 GENERAL

PRELIMINARY WORK
1.1 Traffic Protection and Treatment Ls 2,831,710,274.00 1.00 Rp 2,831,710,274.00 8.37 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195
1.2 Mob & Demob Ls 3,001,500,000.00 1.00 Rp 3,001,500,000.00 8.87 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206 0.206
2 PRELIMINARY
2.1 Measurement & Bowplank m' 74,767.25 260.00 Rp 19,439,485.00 0.06 0.057
2.2 Site Office Ls 254,859,443.04 1.00 Rp 254,859,443.04 0.75 0.188 0.188 0.188 0.188
3 SOIL, EXCAVATION & DRILLING WORKS
3.1 Site Clearing, Stripping & Grubbing m2 19,644.99 1,200.00 Rp 23,573,988.00 0.07 0.035 0.035
3.2 Land Filling & Compaction m3 36,794.46 480.00 Rp 17,661,339.87 0.05 0.052
3.3 Excavation 0-2 M m3 74,706.80 540.00 Rp 40,341,674.69 0.12 0.060 0.060
3.4 Excavation 2-4 M m3 199,644.46 594.96 Rp 118,780,466.24 0.35 0.176 0.176
3.5 Drilling D1200 m' 151,479.37 656.60 Rp 99,461,355.93 0.29 0.098 0.098 0.098
3.6 Drilling Material Removing m3 358,623.74 742.90 Rp 266,420,141.00 0.79 0.394 0.394
3.7 SSP Driving Sheet 3,280,879.97 134.00 Rp 439,637,915.97 1.30 0.650 0.650

A. Budget Plan
4 REINFORCEMENT WORK

4. Conclusion
4.1 Reinforcement Bored Pile Kg 30,214.46 62,736.06 Rp 1,895,536,281.98 5.60 1.868 1.868 1.868
4.2 Reinforcement Pile Cap Kg 34,073.44 36,315.89 Rp 1,237,407,491.27 3.66 0.915 0.915 0.915 0.915
4.3 Reinforcement Pier Kg 37,678.99 23,184.95 Rp 873,585,333.61 2.58 0.861 0.861 0.861
4.4 Reinforcement Pier Head Kg 31,842.37 29,873.39 Rp 951,239,598.28 2.81 0.562 0.562 0.562 0.562 0.562
4.5 Reinforcement Slab Kg 33,637.66 196,941.05 Rp 6,624,635,226.83 19.59 3.264 3.264 3.264 3.264 3.264 3.264
4.6 Reinforcement Barrier Kg 29,873.77 46,571.57 Rp 1,391,268,489.21 4.11 2.057 2.057

DESCRIPTION
5 CONCRETE STRUCTURE
5.1 Concrete Structure f'c 30 Mpa (Bored Pile) m3 1,184,331.88 742.90 Rp 879,835,417.86 2.60 1.301 1.301
5.2 Concrete Structure f'c 30 Mpa (Pile Cap) m3 1,097,442.00 303.17 Rp 332,715,630.67 0.98 0.492 0.492
5.3 Concrete Structure f'c 30 Mpa (Pier) m3 1,278,901.13 156.60 Rp 200,270,417.46 0.59 0.296 0.296
5.4 Concrete Structure f'c 40 Mpa (Pier Head) m3 1,329,532.36 234.94 Rp 312,354,766.87 0.92 0.462 0.462
5.5 Concrete Structure f'c 40 Mpa (Slab) m3 1,324,126.83 497.17 Rp 658,321,390.58 1.95 0.973 0.973
5.6 Concrete Structure f'c 20 Mpa (Barrier) m3 1,154,049.21 41.86 Rp 48,312,496.38 0.14 0.071 0.071
6 DRAINAGE
6.1 Deck Drain m' 161,303.49 240.00 Rp 38,712,836.40 0.11 0.114

B. Schedulling Concept
6.2 Reinforcement Concrete Pipe D100 m' 1,223,987.37 120.00 Rp 146,878,484.76 0.43 0.434
7 SOSROBAHU ls 63,370,737.14 1.000 Rp 63,370,737.14 0.19 0.047 0.047 0.047 0.047
8 FORMWORK
8.1 Formwork Pile Cap m2 258,088.75 168.00 Rp 43,358,910.00 0.13 0.128
8.2 Alsina Climbing Form m2 203,459.89 213.59 Rp 43,456,305.29 0.13 0.064 0.064
8.3 Formwork Pier Head (Shoring) m2 187,630.08 279.73 Rp 52,485,761.86 0.16 0.052 0.052 0.052

BUDGET PLAN RECAPITULATION

8.4 S-Form Ls 210,124,967.63 1.00 Rp 210,124,967.63 0.62 0.207 0.207 0.207
8.5 Bondeks m2 221,331.56 540.00 Rp 119,519,040.00 0.35 0.353
8.6 Formwork Barrier m2 236,442.21 624.00 Rp 147,539,940.00 0.44 0.436
9 STEEL BOX GIRDER Ls 9,771,695,784.67 1.00 Rp 9,771,695,784.67 28.89 14.446 14.446
10 CURING m2 7,468.96 2,665.3166 Rp 19,907,149.74 0.06 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.004
11 FINISHING
11.1 Track Line Marking (Type - 1) m2 344,301.52 360.00 Rp 123,948,547.42 0.37 0.183 0.183
11.2 AC-WC Ton 856,693.51 115.92 Rp 99,307,911.79 0.29 0.147 0.147

JAKARTA CIKAMPEK II ELEVATED TOLL ROAD P.186-P.187

11.3 Bituminous Tack Coat Ltr 22,036.50 441.00 Rp 9,718,096.55 0.03 0.014 0.014
11.4 Public Road Lighting Point 5,691,392.02 9.00 Rp 51,222,528.19 0.15 0.076 0.076
11.5 Traffic Sign Point 1,638,835.89 4.00 Rp 6,555,343.56 0.02 0.010 0.010
12 MISCELLANOUS
12.1 Pile Demolition Point 394,507.50 16.00 Rp 6,312,120.00 0.02 0.009 0.009
12.2 Shoring m3 152,832.30 1,982.21 Rp 302,946,457.31 0.90 0.896
12.3 Scaffolding Unit 535,000.00 40.00 Rp 21,400,000.00 0.06 0.032 0.032
12.4 PC Strand Procurement Ton 12,483,000.00 1.00 12,483,000.00 0.04 0.018 0.018
12.5 Temporrary Bearing Installation Point 1,521,335.00 8.00 Rp 12,170,680.00 0.04 0.036

Total Precentage Rp 33,821,983,227.07 100.00

WEEKLY PROGREE PLAN (%) 0.401 0.794 0.624 0.589 2.556 2.367 4.062 2.746 1.227 1.501 1.325 1.316 1.936 1.758 1.266 1.266 0.437 0.497 0.761 0.701 0.405 1.915 1.015 1.062 1.010 1.472 0.867 0.405 0.507 0.420 18.111 18.433 4.226 3.873 3.666 3.666 2.458 3.431 1.815 0.536 0.911 0.835 0.831
WEEKLY PROGRESS PLAN CUMULATIVE (%) 0.40 1.19 1.82 2.41 4.96 7.33 11.39 14.14 15.37 16.87 18.19 19.51 21.44 23.20 24.47 25.73 26.17 26.67 27.43 28.13 28.54 30.45 31.47 32.53 33.54 35.01 35.88 36.28 36.79 37.21 55.32 73.75 77.98 81.85 85.52 89.18 91.64 95.07 96.89 97.42 98.33 99.17 100.00
MONTHLY PROGRESS PLAN (%) 4.9642 1.2266 1.9358 0.4970 1.9152 1.4722 18.1113 3.6656 1.8147 0.83

NOMINAL PRICE
MONTHLY PROGRESS PLAN CUMULATIVE (%) 10.7876 15.3654 21.4427 26.6672 30.4505 35.0106 55.3204 85.5174 96.8866 100.00

13 | Journal of Construction Management Design of Jakarta-Cikampek II Elevated Toll Road

Project (P.186-P.187)
TOTAL COST RP 33,821,983,227.07
290,752,427.51
27,156,553,273.79
6,107,509,202.04

185,591,321.16
81,577,002.56
WEEKLY CASHFLOW RP
135,656,052.88
268,429,569.86
211,157,907.64
199,370,913.64
864,370,126.28
800,655,265.52
928,602,790.30
414,865,243.99
507,554,218.82
448,163,985.70
445,007,925.70
654,724,651.04
594,630,918.69
428,273,103.35
428,273,103.35
147,777,992.15
168,084,205.53
257,519,414.26
237,213,200.88
137,077,992.15
647,767,623.07
343,399,226.49
359,241,910.78
341,746,656.83
497,924,040.26
293,255,375.59
137,077,992.15
171,332,856.44
141,897,552.88
831,290,297.49
613,778,627.44
181,405,077.69
308,112,725.10
282,454,205.91
281,032,266.64

1,373,783,044.95
6,125,609,816.36
6,234,364,308.64
1,429,322,619.90
1,309,803,579.90
1,239,761,924.02
1,239,761,924.02
1,160,450,992.78

WEEKLY CASHFLOW CASHFLOW CUMULATIVE RP

135,656,052.88
404,085,622.74
615,243,530.39
814,614,444.03
1,678,984,570.31
2,479,639,835.83
3,853,422,880.78
4,782,025,671.08
5,196,890,915.07
5,704,445,133.90
6,152,609,119.60
6,597,617,045.30
7,252,341,696.34
7,846,972,615.03
8,275,245,718.38
8,703,518,821.73
8,851,296,813.88
9,019,381,019.41
9,276,900,433.66
9,514,113,634.54
9,651,191,626.69
10,298,959,249.76
10,642,358,476.25
11,001,600,387.03
11,343,347,043.86
11,841,271,084.12
12,134,526,459.71
12,271,604,451.86
12,442,937,308.29
12,584,834,861.18
18,710,444,677.54
24,944,808,986.17
26,374,131,606.07
27,683,935,185.97
28,923,697,109.99
30,163,459,034.02
30,994,749,331.50
32,155,200,324.29
32,768,978,951.73
32,950,384,029.42
33,258,496,754.52
33,540,950,960.43
33,821,983,227.07
The results of the CPM general work
network analysis, critical path is obtained
with a duration of 248 days, this duration
is called the optimum duration. The
optimum duration was added to the
duration of the predessessor work (public
works) which is 6 days. Then the total
duration is 254 days.
The critical path duration obtained from
the results of the analysis of the work
network is used as data to form the gantt
chart, this gantt chart serves as an
ingredient for monitoring the project
implementation process. In the gantt
chart the duration will increase due to
adjustments to the work calendar. The
number of holidays on the gantt chart is
41 days,
So that the total duration becomes = 254
days + 41 days = 295 days. To be made
into the week, then 295 days are divided
into 6 days (number of days in a week) so
the duration of the week is = 33 Weeks.
So that it can be concluded that the
duration of the project implementation
plan until completion is 295 days, 33
weeks, 10 months. Starting on January
1, 2018 and planned to be completed on
October 23, 2018, with a budget plan of
Rp.33,823,256,667,0656.
5. Suggestion
14 | Journal of Construction Management Design of Jakarta-Cikampek II Elevated Toll Road
- Use the result of specific CPM
analysis as a reference for
implementation method
- Research on the productivity of labor
and tools must be carried out
regularly, in order to obtain better
coefficient values, so that duration
planning and budget plan can
provide more tangible results with
implementation in the site.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Indonesian government. 2005.
Government Regulation No. 15 of
2005 On Highway.
Siallagan Ramot David and Johannes
Tarin. Bridge design withUsing
Profile Single Twin Cellular
Prestress Box Girder. North
Sumatra: Civil Engineering
Department of the University of
North Sumatra.
Semarang: Journal of Civil Engineering
Works. Vol. 5, No. 1: 11-24.
Dawn Sri Handayani, Setiono, and
Winarto. Control of Material
Costs Method Variant Analysis on
Construction.
Setiawati, Dwi Novi. 2013. Analysis of
Productivity Heavy On Project
Herlambang, Dewangga. Surabaya River
Bridge Construction Management
STA 601 + 251 398 Surabaya-
Mojokerto toll road.
Arianto, Arif. 2010. Exploration Methods
Bar Chart, CPM, PDM, PERT,
Line of balance and Time
Project (P.186-P.187)
Chainage Charts in Construction
Project Scheduling.Semarang:
Diponegoro University.

15 | Journal of Construction Management Design of Jakarta-Cikampek II Elevated Toll Road

Project (P.186-P.187)