You are on page 1of 3

REVERSE OSMOSIS REJECT WATER –

METHODS OF DISPOSAL
Sharat V. Rao
Preface:-

Water scarcity is one of the most signiicant ter by forcing the water through a semi
factors due to which extraction of water permeable membrane. Smaller salt mole-
from diferent sources has gained momen- cules along with the water molecules pass
tum. The deteriorating quality, in terms of through the membrane. This water is called
usability, of some of these extracted wa- ‘permeate’. Larger molecules are retained
ters has encouraged proliferation of Water by the membrane along with some water
Treatment Plants. Reverse Osmosis (RO) that does not pass through the membrane
is one type of treatment which has been – this is called ‘concentrate’. This concen-
adopted - especially when the source of trated stream of water which does not pass
water is brackish and has a high content of through the membrane is called RO Reject.
dissolved salts. Desalination of sea water Typically, the reject percentage can be any-
has also become a promising technology, where between 20% - 50% of the low pass-
as available water gets depleted from the ing through the RO system depending on
earth’s surface due to climate warming. the quality of water and type of membrane
Desalination and RO plants generate reject used. When the reject percentage is low,
concentrates which has to be disposed of in you recover more water as permeate, leav-
a safe manner. ing behind more concentrated salt and con-
taminants as reject water and vice-versa.
RO Reject:-
The reject water is hyper saline and may
RO is a water puriication technology contain salt concentrates upto 20,000 –
which separates dissolved solids from wa- 50,000 ppm.

26 / August 2016 / Indian Plumbing Today


Methods to Dispose RO Reject to evaporate water from the RO concen-
Water. trate stream and leaving behind precipitat-
ed salts. These salts which are left behind
RO Reject Water is hyper saline and thus can be used as landills at designated and
cannot be directly disposed into sanitary authorised areas as per the governing rules
sewers, storm drains or any other water and bye laws and with the permission of the
bodies. Some of the common methods ad- AHJ. The advantage of this process is that
opted for disposal are as below:- there is no operational cost involved but the
major disadvantage is that it requires a large
a) Evaporation Ponds, land area - depending on the strength of the
b) Disposal to sanitary sewers, storm concentrate and volume of low.
drains after blending,
c) Irrigating salt tolerant species, In many places, these ponds will have to be
d) Mechanical Evaporation, lined so that the leachate does not permeate
e) Carting away from site by vendors. into the soil and pollute the ground water
or other water sources. Common materials
used as pond liners are PVC, HDPE and bu-
Evaporation Ponds:-
tyl rubber. Clay liners are also used – these
are cheaper but a small amount of seepage
Evaporation Ponds rely on solar energy
would have to be accepted.

Disposal to Sanitary Sewers, Storm blended eluent can then be discharged into
Drains:- sanitary sewers or storm drains. The TDS
value of this discharge eluent should be
This method involves blending RO Reject less than 2,100 ppm. Blended eluent can
Concentrate with treated wastewater ef- also be used for irrigation if the TDS level
luent from a wastewater treatment plant, is below 600 ppm.
thereby taking advantage of blending a
lower TDS (Total Dissolved Solids) stream Irrigating Salt Tolerant Species:-
from the treatment plant with the high TDS
concentrate. Even cooling water eluent, The reject concentrate can be used for irri-
if available, can be used for blending. The gating salt tolerant species of plants, shrubs,

Indian Plumbing Today / August 2016 / 27


trees or any other form of vegetation. A co-
conut tree is one example of a salt tolerant
tree.

Mechanical Evaporation:-

As the name suggests, in this method, me-


chanical devices are used to create forced
evaporation. In this process, the water com-
ponent of the concentrate is converted into
condensable water vapour, leaving behind
wet salt. This wet salt can be used as land-
ill in designated and authorised areas as
per the governing rules and bye laws. The
most common combination of technologies
used for this purpose is a vertical tube fall-
ing ilm brine concentrator followed by a
forced crystalliser.

The major disadvantage of this method of


disposal is the size and complexity of the
equipment and also the fact that they are
cost and energy intensive.

There are other Evaporators available in the


market such as vacuum evaporators, ther-
mal evaporators, etc.

Carting Away from Site by


Vendors:-

In many places, the service of an authorised


and approved vendor can be used - espe-
cially in small plants and when there is a
limitation to adopt any of the above men-
tioned methods of disposal. These vendors
are authorised to cart away the reject water
from the site and dispose them at authorised
and designated areas identiied by the ap-
proving or statutory authorities. Necessary
permissions from concerned departments
will have to be obtained.

Sharat V Rao
Sharat V Rao is an MEP Consultant and
is Managing Director of M/s Engineering
Creations Public Health Consultancy
Pvt Ltd. He is Chairman, IPA Mumbai
Chapter, NEC Member and member of
the Technical Committee.

28 / August 2016 / Indian Plumbing Today

You might also like