Professional Documents
Culture Documents
org
GYNECOLOGY
Cranberry juice capsules and urinary
tract infection after surgery: results
of a randomized trial
Betsy Foxman, PhD; Anna E. W. Cronenwett, BA; Cathie Spino, DSc;
Mitchell B. Berger, MD, PhD; Daniel M. Morgan, MD
OBJECTIVE: The risk of urinary tract infection (UTI) among women RESULTS: The occurrence of UTI was significantly lower in the cran-
undergoing elective gynecological surgery during which a catheter is berry treatment group compared with the placebo group (15 of 80
placed is high: 10-64% following catheter removal. We conducted the [19%] vs 30 of 80 [38%]; odds ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval,
first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the thera- 0.19e0.79; P ¼ .008). After adjustment for known confounders,
peutic efficacy of cranberry juice capsules in preventing UTI after including the frequency of intermittent self-catheterization in the
surgery. postoperative period, the protective effects of cranberry remained
(odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.18e0.94). There were
STUDY DESIGN: We recruited patients from a single hospital between
no treatment differences in the incidence of adverse events, including
August 2011 and January 2013. Eligible participants were undergoing
gastrointestinal upset (56% vs 61% for cranberry vs placebo).
elective gynecological surgery that did not involve a fistula repair or
vaginal mesh removal. One hundred sixty patients were randomized CONCLUSION: Among women undergoing elective benign gyneco-
and received 2 cranberry juice capsules 2 times a day, equivalent to 2 logical surgery involving urinary catheterization, the use of cranberry
8 ounce servings of cranberry juice, for 6 weeks after surgery or extract capsules during the postoperative period reduced the rate of
matching placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of par- UTI by half.
ticipants who experienced clinically diagnosed and treated UTI with or
without positive urine culture. Kaplan-Meier plots and log rank tests Key words: catheter-associated urinary tract infection, clinical trial,
compared the 2 treatment groups. cranberry extract
Cite this article as: Foxman B, Cronenwett AEW, Spino C, et al. Cranberry juice capsules and urinary tract infection after surgery: results of a randomized trial. Am J
Obstet Gynecol 2015;213:194.e1-8.
FIGURE 1
CONSORT flow diagram
Enrollment and exclusions, allocation to treatment, follow-up, and reasons for loss are shown.
CONSORT, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials.
Foxman. Cranberry juice capsules and UTI. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015.
the prevention of urinary tract infections. from adhering to uroepithelial cells, or attachment; these effects would be similar
Cranberry juice may prevent UTIs by by both of these mechanisms.8,9 Other to those seen with subinhibitory con-
selecting against more adhesive strains in effects might include influence on centrations of antibiotics.10 A 2012 sys-
the stool, by directly preventing E coli fimbrial subunit synthesis, assembly, or tematic review and metaanalysis found an
treatment groups by age (younger than 60 the laboratory to forward results to the thus, we assumed the UTI rate to be
years vs 60 years or older), based on the treating physician at the University of similar to that in the literature for pa-
expected median age of our study popu- Michigan Health System if the culture tients receiving prophylactic antibiotics
lation. Stratified randomization (1:1 was performed elsewhere, and written (15e18%).6 We believed we could enroll
Theracran cranberry capsuleseplacebo) instructions for at-home urine collection. approximately 200 participants (100 per
was performed using computer-generated Participants were given a symptom diary treatment group) and calculated that this
permuted blocks, with a block size known to record any urinary symptoms. sample size would provide at least 80%
only to the Data Coordinating Center. The Participants were advised to contact power with a 2-sided type I error of 5%
Data Coordinating Center provided a research staff immediately and to collect to detect a large treatment difference
randomization schedule for the supplier a urine specimen should they experience (65e75% relative risk reduction) if the
who printed labels that were placed on urinary symptoms consistent with UTI. UTI rate was 15e20% in the placebo
each bottle of capsules. When participants contacted research group (based on a 2-sample binomial
After participants were deemed eligible, staff, they were administered a brief test, performed using EAST, version 5.1,
study coordinators performed the ran- structured interview regarding the type 2007; Cytel, Cambridge, MA). Recruit-
domization using the next available and duration of symptoms and referred ment was stopped at 160 randomized
randomization number on a stratum- to their physicians for diagnosis and participants because of budgetary and
specific list provided by the Data Coordi- treatment. Urine was cultured using timing constraints.
nating Center. standard microbiological techniques for Baseline sociodemographic and medi-
the presence of uropathogens at the cal history characteristics were summa-
Masking clinical laboratory selected by their rized using descriptive statistics. Primary
All study personnel (with the exception treating physician. analyses used an intent-to-treat approach.
of designated individuals at the Data Study staff contacted participants We used logistic regression to model the
Coordinating Center), treating physi- within 3 days, and at 2 and 4 weeks after incidence of the primary endpoint and to
cians, and patients were masked to hospital discharge to assess compliance take into account all prespecified risk fac-
treatment assignment. The Investiga- to study protocol, to identify whether the tors including age, UTI history, the pres-
tional Drug Service at the University of participant had urinary symptoms ence of a Foley catheter, and intermittent
Michigan stored and managed the cap- consistent with UTI, and to elicit any self-catheterization.
sules and conducted drug accountability. adverse events. These items were also We also summarized treatment
assessed at the 6 week postoperative differences in the time to UTI using
Study procedures and data collection doctor’s visit using a self-administered Kaplan-Meier methods and tested these
After giving informed consent, each questionnaire. At study exit, capsule differences with log rank tests. A sensi-
participant completed a self-administered bottles were collected so capsules could tivity analysis was performed for the
questionnaire regarding her medical and be counted to assess compliance. primary endpoint, using a modified
sexual history, health behaviors, and Medical records of all randomized intent-to-treat analysis population that
symptoms. Following hospital admission, study participants were reviewed to included only randomized participants
a urine specimen was collected upon identify any missed postoperative sym- who took at least 1 dose of the study me-
catheter insertion in the operating room ptomatic UTI episodes, adverse events, dication. In addition, we assessed treat-
and catheter removal (from the catheter and medications prescribed. All study ment differences in culture-confirmed
port). At the time of hospital discharge, participants received an intravenous UTI and culture-confirmed when E coli
research staff provided the participant with antibiotic administration prior to the was the pathogen. We tested for differ-
enough capsules for 8 weeks of the start of the surgical procedure, including ences in compliance and safety using the
assigned regimen and administered the urinary catheter insertion (as per hos- c2 test.
first dose. Participants were reminded to pital protocol). All analyses were performed using
take the cranberry capsules daily, con- There were no changes to the methods SAS software, version 9.3 (SAS Institute,
tinuing 2 times per day until their post- or trial outcomes after the trial began. Cary, NC).
operative visit, usually at 6 weeks. There were no interim analyses or
Research staff also instructed the par- stopping guidelines. R ESULTS
ticipants to collect a urine sample if they The study protocol, including defini- Study population
experienced urinary symptoms consis- tions of adverse events, is available upon Between August 2011 and January 2013,
tent with a UTI (painful urination, an request. 359 women presenting for elective gyne-
urgent need to urinate, pain/pressure in cological surgery were screened for eligi-
the lower abdomen or pubic area, fever of Statistical methods bility; 160 met the inclusion criteria,
100 F or more, or flank pain), provided a Sample size was based on logistical and agreed to participate and were random-
urine collection kit (containing a pre- statistical principles. Estimates of the ized. Almost all (94%) received the allo-
servative), orders for a urine culture incidence of symptomatic UTI in our cated intervention (cranberry: 74 of 80 vs
(if needed) that included instructions to patient population were unavailable, and placebo: 76 of 80). Reasons for not