Benjamin Irish v. Ramfis Trujillo, CMP, EXB, CCV

Case 1:19-cv-21775-RNS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2019 Page 1 of 41
UN ITED STA TES D ISTR IC T C O U RT SO UTH E RN DISTR ICT O F FLO R IDA

C A SE N O . -LA G ER STRO M /T RU JIL LO
19-cv-21775-Scola/Torres
BenjaminF.Lagerstrom,
a/k/a''BenjnminIrish'' FILED BY D.C .
Plaintiff
MAt 23 2219
ANGELA E.NOBLE
V S. CLE9K U s DISQ C1:
s.D.oFfl
-k.-MI
AMI
LuisRamfisDominguezTrujillo,CarlosSilva, C O N STITU TIO N A L RIG H TS

Silva & Silva A ttorneysatLaw ,Partido Esperanza JU R Y D EM A N D
Democratica,lnc.,(a/k/aFtmdacionRafaelLeonidasTrujillo
M olina lnc.,Barclay W ellington Inc,Fenix Fidelity lnc.,
Proyecto LRDT Inc., Consilium M obililnc.,P.D .T.
lnternationalGroup lnc.,W .D .D esign Stone lnc.,D & O
Entem risesInc.,D M G ProfessionalServices Corp.,
Greenup Serviceslnc.,M atrix ConsultantCop .)
H ilario Castillo,Felix Lugo,Cirilo M atas Dom inguez,
W illiam Lora,FranklinTrujillo,JaimeHernandez,
Rodolfo Silva Contreras,Yasser Senllle Ferdinand,
M aria Laura D .Silva,M aria M ercedes Dom inguez,
M aria Julia Dom inguez,M aria A .Dom inguez,Carlos
Jaim e M cFarlane,M aria M .M cFarlane,Jean D iaz,
Susan Senise,and the D OES UN NU M B ERED ,
D efendants
CO M PLA IN T A N D D EM A ND FO R JU R Y TR IA L
W IT H IN JU N CTIVE RELIEF SO U G H T
1.BenjnminF.Lagerstrom,professionallyknownas''BenjaminIrish''(''plaintiff'or
''Lagerstrom''or''Irish''),suesdefendantsLuisRamfisDominguezTrujillo,CarlosSilva,Silva&
SilvaAttorneysatLaw,PartidoEspernnzaDemocratica,lnc.(a/k/aFundacionRafaelLeonidas
TnjilloM olinalnc.,BarclayW ellingtonlnc,FenixFidelitylnc.,ProyectoLRDT Inc.,
2
Consilitlm M obiliInc.,P.D .T.lnternationalGroup lnc., W .D .Design StoneInc.,D&O
EnterprisesInc.,DM G ProfessionalServicesCop .,Greenup Serviceslnc., M atrix Consultant
Com .),Hilario Castillo,Felix Lugo,CiriloM atasDominguez,W illiam Lora,Franklin Trujillo,

Jaime Hernandez,Rodolfo SilvaContreras,YasserSerulle Ferdinand, M ariaLauraD .Silva,
M aria M ercedesDominguez,M ariaJulia Dom inguez,M ariaA . D om inguez,CarlosJaim e
M cFarlane,M aria M .M cFarlane,Jean D iaz,Susan Senice, and the D O ES UN N UM BER ED ,
(eolledively,''Defendants'')and allegesasfollows:
N ATU R E O F TH IS A CT IO N
2.D efendants have engaged in intentional,outrageous, irresponsible and despicable
conductby designing and displaying on theinternet, television and in paid-forprinted materials
and advertisem entsbegirm ing in M arch 2019 an intentionally false narrative depicting Plaintiff
ashaving a crim inalrecord including sexualassault, false im prisonm ent,stalking,forcible
touching,and m ore,accom panied by graphic narrativesthatdescribe him as a crim inaland are
lurid in their depiction.The Plaintiffhasno crim inalrecord. H e w asthe victim offalse charges
m adeby awom an believedto berelated to m any oftheDefendantsforwhich hewasfully
acquitted twice,and abook and documentary film wereproduced aboutthiscalled ''M argarita's
M illions'';Defendantsdesigned an onlineguideto comm itthesecrimesandencouragetheir
followersto do samewhich isexhibited in evidence,actually swearing in by oath ''discipline
directors''and ''externalsectorbosses''to theirprivate com orationsto achievethis.
3.The motivebehindthisviciousand unintelligentassaulton PlaintiffbyDefendantsis
becausethey areengaged in ablatantly criminalfraud scheme utilizing for-profh companies
registered in Floridato deceivethepublicand profitfrom a fakepoliticalcampaign prom oting a
fake Dom inican presidentialcandidate, whenneitherisregistered oreligible,andthepartieshave

been informed ofthisby officialsin 2016,yetthey continueto profh from thisdeception doing
anything and eveN hingto continueit,including threatening thelivesofit'svictim spublicly.

Defendants'm aliciousconductinvolvesadirectand obsceneinterferencein theoperationsand
reputationsofTheUnited StatesGovernmentand The Governm entsofothernations,their
nationalsecurity concerns,rightfuland pum osed appointm entsand considerations,their
establishm entsunder com ity law sbetw een each other,theirelections,econom ies,and other
urgentm attersrelated directly to the Plaintiff,as show n herein.
4.On M arch 12,2019,following meetingsand deliberations,theDefendants,including
theirattorneys,w ilfully and know ingly senta letterto overeighteen differentFederaland Florida
governm entagencies,ofticials,asw ellasothers,defam ing the Plaintiffas described above and
making com pletely false statem entsabouthislegitim ate credentialsfortheirown illidtgains.
5.Theletterwasalso mailedto personsin the Dom inican politicaldiasporain TheUnited
Stateswho Defendantsbelieved were ''ratting''them tlzrough thePlaintiffto the FederalBureau
ofInvestigation(FBI),seekingtoobstrud Justiceandtamperwithwitnesses.
6.Theletterwasso prem editated thatit'sm aliciousintent,purposeand motivewere
announcedbyDefendantLuisRamfisDominguezTnjillo t''RamfisTrujillo'')andattorney
CarlosSilva(''Silva'')inaseriesofcontrolledphonecallsdaysbeforetheyissuedit,onesueh
phonecalltakingplaceon aliveTV show astheDominicanpubliclistenedtoM r.Trujillo
explain in English to the Plaintiffhow he intended to falsely dim inish hisreputation.
PLA INTIFF
7.Plaintiffisacandidatefortheposition ofUnited StatesAmbassadorto TheDominican
Republic,confirm ed in consideration through com munication with The W hiteHouse and
PresidentDonaldJ.TrumponM ay22,2017;heisregisteredasaForeignBusinessAgent(#
4
6453)withTheUnitedStatesDepartmentofJustice,isamemberofTheRNC Presidential
AdvisoryBoard(355867260)appointedbyPresidentTrump,enrolledto TheRepublican
PresidentialHonorRollby PresidentTrum p and VicePresidentM iehaelPence,andwasthe
2018 keynote speakerforThe U.S.Christian ChaplainsAssociation;hisprivatework, critically
relatedto hispublicim age,includesintervention on the behalfofVenezuelan Sum eme Court
Judiciarym emberstargeted forassassination by dictatorNicholasM aduro, representing in-lobby
a Catholic charity fororphansw ith HIV and A ID S in The Dom inican Republic, being a signatory
to TheUnityAgreementBetweenNations,atreaty between TheDom inican Republicand The
United States;endorsing,cnmpaigning,and working with awidevariety ofpoliticalcandidates
includingthosewho areRepublicans,Dem ocratsand lndependentsin Floridaand New York,
intervention in m attersofcivilunrestin TheDominican Republicalongside United StatesDN C
delegates,and m any,m any m ore accom plishm entsrelated to this m atter, fartoo m any to m ention
here.
8.Plaintiffisahousehold namein The Dom inican Republicbecauseofhis
accom plishm entsthere,and hoststhelargestsocialmediaaudience in the nation, having reached
over fourm illion hom es since 2016 in the nation ofroughly eleven m illion people;his cnm paign
forU .S.Ambassadorin 2017 and 2018m adehim acelebrity and heisknown as''thevoiceof
The Dom inican People to W ashington'',and ''the Am bassador ofThe D om inican People'';his
im ageand likenessal'edepicted in m uralsthroughouttheLatin Am erican nation on thesidesof
buildings,discussinghispublic battleswith com munistsincluding dictatorNicholasM aduro.
Plaintiffhasbeen received by oftk ialsand representativesofm any nationsin North Americafor
his unpaid w ork.
9.Plaintiffis the m ostsought-afterpoliticalendorsem entin The D om inican Republiv.

5
DefendantshadattemptedforovertwoyearstohavePlaintiffendorseDefendantRamfisTrujillo
fortheDominican Presidency,and Plaintiffwould notendorsehim .
10.On Decem ber23,2018Plaintiffgavehis''StateofThe Dom inican Republic''speech
which wasviewed byoveronemillion Dom inicansand aired alongsidetheDom inican President
Danilo M edina'ssimilarevent,with thePlaintiffattracting an audienceten timeslargerthan the
actualD om inican Presidentin his own country;
11.Plaintiffrefused to endorse anybody fortheDom inican Presidencyinthe speech
calling them ''a11abunch ofcrooks''andarmounced an investigation ofacom oration with
operationsin The D om inican Republic and The State ofFlorida nnm ed M arA zulGem s;Plaintiff
nnnounced in hisspeech hisinquiry would includetheconnection ofthiscom oration to
Dom inican elections.Defendantshad transacted businessw ith the com pany.
12.Plaintiffisa residentofThe State ofN ew Y ork.
D EFEN D AN TS
13.Ata1lrelevanttim es,defendantscollectively w ere and are a for-profitcom pany
organized and operating underthe lawsoftheStateofFlorida, with itsprincipalplaceof
businessbeing a M iam istorage locker facility. W hile the com pany goesby over a dozen
differentnam es,itsm ostnotablecorporatemonikeris''The Partido Esperanza Dem octratica''
(''P.E.D.''),andagressivelypromotesitselfasapoliticalorganizationinUnited Statesandother
terrirotries,despitenotbeing registeredpoliticalparty and itsoperatorsknow and are fully aware
thisisasamajorcrimebutcontinuetotheflaunttheLaw.TheDefendantsappoint''bosses'and
''discipline directors''totheorganization andeven swear-in new ''m embers'with publicoath
ceremonies.Since2014 theyhaveregistered overtwelvedifferentcorporatem onikersat
ww w.sunBiz.org astransacting businessatthatlocation.Forthepurposeofclearand concise

litigation,the combined corporationswillbereferredto asThe Partido EsperanzaDem ocratica
('P.E.D.''),orin mattersrelatingtothelaw 51-111withfullauthorityoversuchDefendants,

referredtoasSilva& Silva.(1)
14.On infonnation andbelief,allDefendantsareeithercitizens, residentsor
dom iniciliariesofFloridapursuantto 28 U.S.C.1332(c),withtheexceptionofYasserSerulle
Ferdinand,who is believed to be a residentofN ew Jersey.
15.A large num berofthe defendants are related to one another.
16.Atallrelevanttimes,defendantLuisRamfisDominguezTrujillol''RamtisTrujillof')
w as and is a citizen,residentand dom iciliary ofthe State ofFlorida pursuantto 28 U .S.C.
1332(c).DefendantispartnerofallofthecompaniesregisteredattheMiami,FL storagelocker.
He isa convictedfelon,havingpled fortime-served in M iam iDadeCounty on Fraud charges.
Heisthe mastennind oftheoperation and thegrandson ofDom inican dictatorRafaelLeonidas
Trujillo,who isresponsiblefortheassassinationsofoveronemillionDominicansbeforehisown
assassination on M ay 30,1961by guerilla soldiersunderthe assistmzceoftheCentral
IntelligenceAgency(C.I.A.).DefendantRamfisTnjilloiscondudingamassivefraudinwhich
he portrayshim selfasa Dom inican PresidentialCandidate, despitebeing ineligibleforsuch and
thatbeing constitutionally illegalin The D om inican Republic.tz)
(1)TheentirelistofallthecorporateentitiesknowntothePlaintiffthatarestatedhere,for
referenceis1)''Fundaction RafaelLeonidasTrujillo'',2)''BarclayW ellingtonInc.'',3)''Fenix
Fidelity'',4)''ProyectoLRDT 1nc.'',5)'PartidoEsperanzaDemocratica1nc.'',6)Consilium
M obililnc.,7)''P.D.T.IntemationalGrouplnc.'',8)''W .D.Design Stonelnc.'',9)''D&O
Enterprises1nc.'',10)''DM G ProfessionalServicesCorp.'',11)''GreenupServices1nc.'',12)
''M atrix ConsultantCorp.'',allofthem are registered asactive ata M iam istorage lockerfacility
called ''TheKendallCrossingsComm erce Center''.
(2)Asthegrandson ofthedeceaseddictator,TheDominicanConstitutionallaw 53.03 forbids

descendantsofTrujillofrom beingPresidentorVicePresidentofthecountry,aswellasother
publicpositions.Defendantsareknowledgeableand awareofthis.
17.Atal1relevanttim es,Defendantscollectively wereand area11underthecontrolof
defendantsSilva& Silva,a1aw firm ,and attorney CarlosSilva, based in CoralGables,FL,
ptlrsuantto28U.S.C.1332(c),andal1corporateauthoritylaws.Upon informationandbelief
DefendantSilvaisorwasrelatedbymaniagetoDefendantRnmfisTrujillo.Hewasappointedto
hisposition byDefendantRamtisTnjillo.
18.Atal1relevanttimes,defendantM aria LatzraD . Silva('M ariaSilva'
')wasand isa
citizen,residentand dom iciliary ofthe State ofFlorida pursuantto 28 U .S.C.1332(c).Defendant
ispartnerofa11ofthe com panies registered atthe M iam i, FL storage locker.U pon inform ation
andbeliefDefendantM ariaSilvaisrelatedtoDefendantRnmfisTrujilloandDefendantCarlos
Silva.ShewasappointedtoherpositionbyDefendantRamfisTrujillo.
19.A tal1relevanttim es,defendantM aria A . Dominguez('
'MariaA'')wasandisa
citizen,residentand dom iciliary oftheState ofFloridapursuantto 28 U .S.
C.1332(c).Defendant
ispartnerofal1ofthecom paniesregistered attheM inm i, FL storage loeker.U pon infonnation
andbeliefDefendantM ariaA isrelatedtoDefendantRamfisTnjilloandDefendantCarlos

Silva.ShewasappointedtoherpositionbyDefendantRamfisTrujillo.
20.Atallrelevanttimes,defendantM ariaM ercedesDominguez(''M ariaMercedes'')was
and isacitizen,residentand dom iciliaryofthe StateofFloridapursuantto 28U .S.C.1332(c).
Defendantispartnerofal1ofthecompaniesregistered attheM iam i, FL storage locker.U pon
informationandbeliefDefendantM ariaMercedesisrelatedtoDefendantRamtisTrujilloand
DefendantCarlosSilva.Shewasappointedtoherposition byDefendantRamtisTrujillo.
21.Atallrelevanttimes,defendantHilarioCastillo (''Castil1o'')wasandisacitizen,
residentand dom iciliaryoftheStateofFloridaptlrsuantto 28U .S.C.1332(c).Defendantisa
promoterofthe fraud.DefendantCastillo isthe managerofthe fraud and an actorin its
distribution portraying the role of ''cam paign m anager''.H e w asappointed to his position by
DefendantRamfisTrujillo.
22.Atallrelevanttimes,defendantFelix(''Lugo'')wasandisacitizen,residentand
domiciliaryoftheStateofFloridapursuantto28U.S.C.1332(c).Defendantisapromoterofthe
fraud.HewasappointedtohispositionbyDefendantRamfisTrujillo.
23.Ata1lrelevanttimes,defendantCarlosJaimeMcFarlane(''CarlosM cFarlanef')was
andisacitizen,residentanddomicilimy oftheStateofFloridapursuantto28U.S.C.1332(c).
Defendantis aprom oterofthe fraud.U pon inform ation and beliefCarlosM cFarlane ism arried
to D efendantM aria M ercedes.H e w asappointed to his position by hisbrother in law ,D efendant
RamfisTrujillo.
24.Ata1lrelevanttimes,defendantMariaJuliaDominguez(''MariaJulia'')wasandisa
citizen,residentand domiciliaryoftheStateofFloridapursuantto28U.S.C.1332(c).Defendant
ispartnerofallofthecompaniesregistered attheM iam i,FL storage locker.Upon inform ation
andbeliefDefendantM ariaJuliaisrelatedtoDefendantRamfisTrujilloandDefendantCarlos
Silva.Shewasappointedtoherposition byDefendantRamfisTrujillo.
25.Ata1lrelevanttimes,defendantFranklinTnjillowasandisacitizen,residentand
domiciliaryoftheStateofFloridapursuantto28U.S.C.1332(c).Defendantispartnerofallof
the com paniesregistered atthe M iam i,FL storage locker.Upon inform ation and belief
D efendantFranklin illegally advisesThe Dom inican G overnm enton behalfofthe D efendants
concem ing espionage and propagandam attersin violation ofTheLogan Actand otherU.S.
criminalLaws.DefendantFranklinis relatedtoDefendantRnmfisTnjilloandDefendantCarlos
Silva.HewasappointedtohispositionbyDefendantRamfisTrujillo.
26.Ata11relevanttimes,defendantYasserSerulleFerdinand(''Seru1le'
')wasandisa
citizen,residentand dom iciliary ofthe State ofN ew Jersey.D efendantSerulle is em ployed by
Defendantscop orationsasavideo andm ediaproducer.Hewasappointed to hisposition by
DefendantHyman ''Jaime''Hem andez.
27.Ata11relevanttimes,defendantHyman ''Jaime''Hernandez(''l-lernandez'')wasandis
acitizen,residentanddom iciliary oftheStateofFlorida.DefendantHernandez isem ployed by
DefendantseorporationsasDefendantRamfisTnjillo'srighthandman.Hewasappointedtohis
positionbyDefendantRamtisTnjillo.
28.Ata11relevanttimes,defendantSusanaSenise(''Senise'')wasandisacitizen,resident
anddomiciliaryoftheStateofFloridapursuantto28U.S.C.1332(c).Defendantisoneofthe
accountantsfortheentemrise.ShewasappointedtoherpositionbyDefendantRamfisTrujillo.
29.Ata11relevanttimes,defendantJeanDiaz(''Diaz'')wasandisacitizen,residentand
domiciliaryoftheStateofFloridapursuantto28U.S.C.1332(c).Defendantisapromoterofthe
fraud,and upon inform ation and beliefthe husband ofD efendantSenice.He w asappointed to
hispositionbyDefendantRamfisTnjillo.
30.Atallrelevanttimes,defendantCirilo M ataDominguezwasand isacitizen,resident
anddomiciliaryoftheStateofFloridapursuantto28U.S.C.1332(c).Healso ownsahomein
W estchesterCounty,New York.Defendant,upon infonnation and belief,paid $50,000.00 to his
associatesto bea ''bossofSantiago'',a city in TheDom inican Republic.Defendantisapromoter
ofthefraud.HeisDefendantTrujillo'scousin.HewasappointedtohispositionbyDefendant
RamfisTrujillo.
31.Ata11relevanttimes,defendantW illiam Lora(''Lora'')wasandisacitizen,resident
and dom iciliary ofthe State ofFlorida pursuantto 28 U .S.
C.1332(c).Defendantisapromoterof
10
thefraud.HewasappointedtohispositionbyDefendantRamtisTrujillo.
32.Atallrelevanttimes,defendantRodolfoSilvaContreras(''contreras'')wasandisa
citizen,residentanddomiciliaryoftheStateofFloridapursuantto28U.S.C.1332(c).Defendant
isapromoterofthefraud.Upon infonnation and belief,he wasappointed to hisposition by
DefendantRamfisTrujillo.
33.Plaintiffisinform ed and believesand based thereon allegesthatthe fictitiously-
nam ed defendantssued herein asthe DoesU nnum bered,and each ofthem ,are in som e m anner
responsible orlegally liable forthe actions,events,transactionsand circum stancesalleged
herein.The tnze nam esand capacities ofsuch tictitiously-nnm ed defendants,whetherindividual,
com orate,or otherwise,are presently unknow n to Plaintiff,and Plaintiffw illseek leave ofCourt
to am end thisCom plaintto assertthe true nam esand capacities ofsuch fictitiously-nam ed
defendantsw hen the sam e have been ascertained.Forconvenience,each reference to a nam ed
defendantherein shallalso referto theDoesUrmumbered.Alldefendants,including both the
nam ed defendantsand thosereferred to herein as The D oes Ulm um bered,are som etim es
collectively referred to herein as ''D efendants.''
34.Plaintiffis inform ed and believesand based thereon allegesthatattorney Carlos Silva,
a partnerin the Silva & Silva 1aw firm ,has worked in partnership w ith a11ofthe otherdefendants
in civilconspiracyagainstPlaintiffand alloftheactsbythecollectivedefendantsherein by and
betw een each other;Plaintiffseeksleave ofthe courtto file a m otion forSanctions ofM r.Silva
and hispartnersatthe 51%1pursuantto FederalRule ofCivilProcedure l1.
35.Plaintiffisinformed andbelievesand based thereon allegesthatDefendants,and each
ofthem,wereandaretheagents,licensees,employees,partners,joint-venturers,co-conspirators,
owners,principals,and em ployersoftherem aining Defendants,and each ofthem are,and atall
timesherein m entioned were,acting within the courseand scopeofthatagency,license,
partnership,employment,conspiracy,ownership,orjointventure.Plaintifffurtherisinformed
and believesand basedthereon allegesthattheactsand conductherein allegedofeach ofthe
Defendantswereknown to,authorized by,and/orratifiedby theotherDefendants,and each of
them .
JU RISDICT IO N A N D V EN UE
36.ThisCourthassubjectmatterjurisdiction overthiscasepursuantto28U.S.C.jj
1331and 1338(a)and 17U.S.C.jj101,etseq.,becauseitarisesasaresultofviolationsofthe
U.S.CopyrightAct.TheU.S.DistrictCourthasexclusivejurisdictionoverclaimsofcopyright
infringementpursuantto28U.S.C j 1338(a).
37.Thisisadiversityactionbroughtptlrsuantto28U.S.C.j 1332forinvasion of
privacy,intentionaland negligentinfliction ofem otionaldistress,and violation ofrightof
publicity,civilconspiracyamongotherclaims.ThisCourthasjurisdictionovertheseclaims
pursuantto28U.S.C.j 1332.Theamountin controversyinthisactionexceeds$75,000and
thereiscom pletediversity asbetween Plaintiffand allDefendants.Venue liesin the Southern
DistrictofFloridapursuantto28U.S.C.j1391(b)(2)becausea1lbutoneoftheDefendants
reside in and conductthe relevanttransactions and actsw ithin the Southern D istrictofFlorida
within them eaning ofthatprovision.
38.Defendantsaresubjecttopersonaljurisdiction andserviceofprocessunderFlorida
1aw as follow s'
.
39.PursuanttoFloridaStatute48.193(l)(a),byoperating,conducting,engagingin,or
carlying on a businessorbusinessventurein theStateofFloridaand Plaintifpscausesofaction
setforth below arise from thisactivity;

12
40.PursuanttoFloridaStatute48.193(l)(b),Defendantscommittedtortiousactswithin
theStateofFloridaandwithinthisjudicialdistrictby,amongotherthings,civilconspiracy,their
invasion ofPlaintiffsprivacy,public disclosureofprivate facts,violation ofPlaintiffsrightof
publicity,infringem entofPlaintiffscopyrights,and intentionalandnegligentinfliction of
em otionaldistressupon Plaintiff,asm orefully described herein.Plaintiffscausesofaction set
forth below arise from these tortiousacts.
FAC TS G IV IN G R ISE TO TH E C LAIM S
41.Defendantsslandered the Plaintiffin an obscene and negligentactthatrises to the
crim inallevelby accusing the Plaintiffofbeing a crim inalconvicted ofsex crim esw hen he is
not,and accusing him ofbeing paid money by thecurrentDominican Governm entand itsVice
President,M argarita Fernandez,to attack them ,w hich he is not,utilizing contentfrom
intellectualproperty ow ned by the Plaintiff,w hich they dow nloaded at
www.Margaritaspress.com,oneofthePlaintiffswebsites.(EXHIBIT ''A'')
42.Theattackswere so viciousand shocking to thepublicthatthey becam eanational
newsitem forDom inicans,and resulted in inquiresaboutthose claim sfrom FBIand Department
ofJusticeofficials.Thegood reputation ofthePlaintiffhasbeen ruined beyond repair,and he
willconstantlyhaveto livewith thestigmaofbeing questioned aboutwhetherornothe isa
rapist,com zpt,and a crim inal,asthe false nanutive abouthim designed by the D efendants is so
w idely distributed thata sim ple G oogle search ofhis nam e revealsdozens offraudulentarticles
w ritten by the defendantscollectively stating these liesas fact.
43.TheDefendantscannotarguethattheyreasonably believed theliesthey prom ulgated
to be trtle,because they know and follow the Plaintiffin the m edia and on the internet;m any of
the Defendantsare orhave followed Plaintiffs Facebook pages foryears,and were registered as
such when they acted in concertto deceive thepublicinto believing Plaintiffwasacorrupt
sexualcrim inal.
44.ln fact,Defendants''stripped''intellectualproperty from thewebsiteowned bythe
Plaintiff.Thewebsite'sfirstand m ain portalpageannouncesasnewsan item in thepage'slargest
andboldesttypeface.Ithasbeen there forovertwoyears. Itstates:
''A historic legalbattle.lrish winsfirstrotmd ofcourtbattles;actressadm itsto

conspiring with CBS producer' ,stagesetforFederalCivilRightslawsuit.''
45.Defendants,followersofthePlaintiffon Facebook foryears, w ere senttw o m essages
which areFacebook Postsandwhich they readviathemediaplatform on theday ofPlaintiffs
acquittalaboutthe chargesthey accuse him ofbeing guilty of, on Septem ber 29,2017,thatstated
in English and Spanish:
'BREAIUNG NEW S...BenjaminlrishW INSFIRST LEGAL BATTLE IN CBS 17

M A TTERS...UN AN IM OU S DECISION .''
''U N AN IM OU S N O T-G UILTY ALL FIV E CO UN TS, aftertw o w eek trial,

Queens,New York...KNOCKOUT!UnanimousdecisionforBenjaminlrish...''
''QueensAssistantDistrictAttorney...inhisclosingstatementstheorizedthat...
Germosen is'probably notavery good actress'and '1wouldn'thaveheratmy house
fordinner.'He described...theformerCBS talentagentwho... threatened intext
messagesthathewould fram eIrish forrapeas'a scum bag... who preyson w om en.'...''
''Afterdeliberating on Thursday evening and Friday morning, theJury delivered it's

notetoJudgeZollat11:35 a.m .asthe courtfilledto capacity.HisHonorcautioned the
courtto remaincomposed following an em otionaltrial...''
''The room fellsilentasthe Jury read the unanim ous verdict:N O T G UILTY ON A LL
C OUN TS.''
46.The Defendants,given thehigh-profilenatureofthecasethePlaintiffwon, their
relationships,knowledge and understanding ofthecase, and otherwise,haveno claim
whatsoeverthatthey reasonablybelieved the slanderthey distributed to betrue. This is an

14
obsceneabuseofthe PlaintiffsCivilRights.
47.The Defendants saw how hannfulfalse accusationsofrape can be and whatan
effectivetoolthey areto destroy theirfoes,and simply didthesam ethingto the Plaintifftheir
cousin did.
48.TheDefendantsareoperating afraudthatprom otesaFloridafor-profitcompany
called by overa dozen nam esregistered ata M iam istorage lockerfacility asa politicalparty
even though itisnotregistered,to nm illegal''fundraisers''throughoutThe State ofFlorida,
acrossTheUnited Statesand even in foreign cotmtriesforan actornnmed LuisRamfis
DominguezTnzjillot''ltnmtisTrujillo'')whotellsthepublictheir'donations''tohismanyprofit-
only com paniesare to supporthisbid to be PresidentofThe D om inican Republic,since 2014.
(EXHIBIT ''B'')
49.Ofcourse,DefendantRnmfisTrujilloisnotregisteredandisineligibleforThe
D om inican Presidency,and a11D efendantsare aw are ofthis factand w ere notified by Dom inican
Election A uthoritiesin 2016 of such.
50.D efendants are notregistered asa politicalparty in The D om inican R epublic and are
ineligible for such by D om inican Law,and a1lD efendants are aw are ofthisfactand w ere notified
byDominicanElectionAuthoritiesin2016ofsuch.(EXHIBIT ''C'')
51.Defendantstransacted businesswith M arAzulGem s,whose ownersoperated a
politicalparty registered only during thattim e in The D om inican Republic,called The Partido
DemocraticalnstitutionalDemocratica(''P.D.l.'').
52.DefendantRamfsTrujillohasapriorfelonyandmisdemeanorcriminalrecordin
Floridaforfraud,casenumbersF95033388andM 92052858b,andisthesubjectofan
IN TER PO L investigation,and otherinvestigations relating to fraud and othercrim es,m ost
15
notablyconcerningthecorporationBNV ofAustralia,whoallegedthatMr.Tnl
jilloreceived
overone m illion dollars from theirorganization ''to build housesand shelterforthe poor'in the
Dom inican Republic,and abruptlyceased reasonablecomm unication with them ,notone ofthe
homesbeing built.Defendantshad tried unsuccessfully since2017to securePlaintiffs
endorsementforM r.Trujilloasapresidentialcandidate,whichthePlaintiffrefusedtodo,in
part,because ofhistrack record ofcrim e.
53.D efendants becam e aw are in Decem ber2018 thatPlaintiffw as advising 1aw
enforcem entagenciesin The U nited Statesand The D om inican Republic abouttheirfraudulent
politicalparty and thatthe P.E.D .com pany had been intiltrated by m em bersofthe P.D .I.
politicalparty,and thatthe infiltration w aspandem ic,w ith m ultiple m em bersw ere acting as
infonnantsforthe governm ents ofboth nations,and D efendantsbegan to attem ptto detenuine
w ho w as ''ratting''them out.
54.D efendants began to expose thisknow ledge to the actualinfiltratorsinside their
enterprise,and asked thatthey m ake attem pts to persuade Plaintiffto drop hisinvestigation of
theircrim inalenterprise.
55.Persons from w ithin theirorganization m ade visitsto Plaintiffsoffice to provide
evidence,give recorded statem ents,and otherwise explain how Defendantsoperated the fraud.
Plaintifflearned thatthe Defendantshad m ade repeated attem ptsto overthrow The D om inican
Governm entand falsitied propaganda to the public thatportrayed PresidentDonald J.Tnzm p and
The U nited StatesD epartm entofJustice as supporting this,in m edia and atlive events,and had
conducted aseriesofactsthatincluded threatsand violenceagainsttheirvictim sand their
fam ilies,violations ofU .S.espionage law s,and m ore;one such depiction ofPresidentTrum p
featured hishead superim posed on the body ofa D om inican politician standing arm in arm w ith
16
Mr.Trujillo.ThephotowaswidelydistributedbyDefendantstopoorDominicanswiththe
statementthatTrumpendorsedhim andhiscampaign.Mr.Trujilloisseen on atelevision
program stating he hasthesupportof''...agood friend in The W hiteHouse,and his
Administration...''supportsthecnrnivalstylefraudheisoperating.(EXHIBIT ''D'')
56.PlaintiffrealizedthedetrimenttheDefendantsposed to thepublicand began in
February 2019 to use his trem endous m edia intluence to expose thisactivity as the fraud itis,and
becam e the instantand unforgiving targetofthe D efendants forthe abuses described herein in
w ays fully guarded by The United States Constitution.D efendants conspired using unlaw fulacts
to preventthe Plaintifffrom exercising those rightsto protectthe public.
57.O n oraboutFebnzary 27,2019 Plaintiffbegan to send lettersto eventhalls in Florida
thatwere scheduled to hostthese events and asked thatthey be ealw eled because oftheir
deceptive nature and detrim entto the public.H e also reached outto m ultiple law enforcem ent
agenciesandoftkialstohavetheseeventscanceledtoprotectthepublic.(EXHIBIT ''E'')
58.O n or aboutM arch 7,2019 Plaintiffappeared on SaborFM 88.9 w ith RaulEncantara,
aradio show aboutDom inican Politicsin New York City;PlaintiffexposedthefactthatM r.
Trujillowasunregistered andineligibleina1lwaystobeDominicanPresident,andsuchwas
frontpagenewsin TheDominicanRepublic.(EXHIBIT ''F'')
59.On oraboutM arch 8,2019 Plaintiffgave amediainterview in which hewasasked
abouthisinvestigationofM r.Trujilloandwhathadbeenuncoveredthusfar,andhedecidedit
wouldbebesttoaskM r.Trujillodirectlyifitwastruehis''campaign''wasawell-plannedfraud.
Suchwasthepublicsentiment,andwhenhereachedMr.Trujillomomentslaterin alive
reeorded call,theDefendantrefused to answerPlaintiffsquestionsbutinsteadthreatenedthe
Plaintiffon liveTV,howeveritiswidely determined theon-airphonecallwasthe initial

downfallofM r.Trujillo'sillegalenterprise,asitbecameanationalmediapiecefordaysinthe
country,with Plaintiffshouting down the fakecandidatein aheated argumentand telling him to
''beaman''infrontofthewholenation.DuringtheconversationTrujillomadestatementsthat
show hewaspurposefully plarming to defamethePlaintiffin aprem editated, illegalfashion.M r.
Trujillostatesinevidencethethreats:
''Mr.BenjaminIrish,phony,Idon'
tevenknow whatyourlastnameis--well,ldo
actually have yourlastnam e,Iknow yourfullnnm e, and 1haveyouraddress,and we
have a1lthe inform ation w e need,so w e're taking care ofit, don'tw orry aboutit,don'tyou
worry aboutit...''
''Iam registered-''
''Y ou have crim inalcharges outagainstyou.''
''M r.Irish,we'
re going to addressyourconcem s, allthelettersthatyou sentto us,all
those concerns directly with you.'
'Originalemphasisofspeaker.
W hen asked ifhe would addressthelegalm attersthatpertained to TheUnited States
Governm enthe stated:''N o no,no,no,nol''
W hen asked ifhewould presentproofthathewasregistered oreligibleto bea

Dom inican Presidentialcandidatehe stated:''Noooooool''
''M y attorney hasbeen trying to callyou.''
60.DefendantCarlosSilva,Esq.isapartnerin the1aw firm Silva & Silva ofCoral
G ables,FL;O n oraboutM arch 8,2019,in the hotlrsfollowing the aforem entioned TV argum ent
betweenDefendantTrujilloandPlaintiff,M r.SilvacalledPlaintiffandaseriesofcontrolled
phonecallswerecompleted between them . ln those callsDefendantSilvarevealsto thePlaintiff
hisposition in the fraud and threatenshim :
'M y nam e is attorney Carlos Silva,you called m y client... Look m e up.Letm e give you
m y information so you can look m eup and know you aretalking to arealperson... ''
''ldon'thavean attitude,1am with Silva & Silva, 1'm in Coralgables,1'm alawyer...l'm

registered there,I'm barred in N ew York, W ashington,Chicago,lllinois...1understand
18
yourarecallingm yclientand m aking thingsup... Iunderstand the politicalparty behind

you hasputyou up to this...''
''You don'tunderstand whatl'm talkingabout,lhave looked you up... lhave called all
the organizationson thetitlesthatyou have given yourselfthatarenottitles...''
The attorney asksforPlaintiffsaddressrevealinghe did notcom pletetheduediligence

requirementshe stated in hisprevioussentencethathedid complete:''Giveitto m e.. .
Give meyourinform ation so Icanwriteyou aletter...''
In regardsto The D epartm entofJustice registration Plaintiffholdsthe attorney states:

''Dude,you havenothing to do with them buddy...''and ''...they're alreadyinvestigating
yOtl...f,
''You'
reputup tothis...You'
re putup to this... By a politicalpa1'
ty...''
''There isno evidence,they'
reallliesthatyoum ade up and you'llbe sued forthem .''
''1've read your letter.''
''Everybodyknowsyouareajoke,Benjamin.Everybodyknowsyouareajoke.''
'You couldn'tshoveanything up anybody'sass...''
''W e'
re com ing afteryou,w e're com ing afteryoul''
W hen asked aboutthe threatto ' com e after'Plaintiff, the lawyerresponded:''W e'
re
com ing afteryou legally,w e're com ing afteryou legally. .. ''
''Y ou are a fraud...''
''Everything you say isa lie,we'

regoing to sueyou fordamages. You have damaged
som ebody...You know how you've dnm aged him ?''
''W eneedtoputastop,weneedtoputastoptothis(inaudiblel...''
''W e'1lbe handling thiso..''
''W eare,wearegoingto(inaudible)totheFBl...''
61.Approxim ately fourdays laterwith deliberate consideration, D efendantCarlosSilva
ofSilva& Silva,on Silva & Silvaletterhead, utilizing Silva & Silva resources,as a partnerin the
law firm ,discharged aregistered letterto thePlaintiffaspromised, athishom eaddress,accusing

thePlaintiffofviolating Florida laws,being guilty ofhate crim es,being guilty ofsexualabuse
crimes,statingthatDefendantRamfisTnzjilloisalegitimatePresidentialcandidate,revealing
and confinning therelationship ofthe Candidatesto thecompany Plaintiffpubliclyannounced an
investigation againston D ecem ber23,2018 fortheirinvolvem entin D om inican elections,
claimingfalselythatDefendantTrujillodoesnothaveacriminalrecordforfraud,accusingthe
Plaintiffofcorruption by hisow n personalknow ledge,accusing the Plaintiffofim personating a
FederalA gent,threatening Plaintiffw ith law suitsand im prisonm ent,ofm isrepresenting his
address,and stating the letterw illserve asa ''pre-suit''letterunlessPlaintiffceases allofhis
First-AmendmentprotectedspeechaboutMr.Tnl
jillo 'byMarch 11,2019'',thedaybeforethe
letterw as m ailed.
62.The letterisnotoriousbecause itis patently false.ln this instance the attorney knew
he wasfabricating hisstatementsand did so with theexpressed intentofthreatening the Plaintiff
to silence him from exposing the fraud he ispartand parcelto.
63.ln doing such Defendantim puted hisauthority upon The United StatesG overnm ent
bymailingcarboncopiesoftheletterto 1)FBlFlorida,2)FBIW ashington,3)FBINew York,

4)UnitedStatesSecretService,5)TheUnited SGtesDepartmentofState,6)TheOfficeofThe
UnitedStateslnspectorGeneral,7)TheFloridaDepartmentofState,8)TheOfficeofGovernor
RonDesantis,9)TheOfficeoftheCityM anagerofM iami,10)TheOfficeoftheCityM anager
ofW estPalm Beach,11)TheOfficeofTheCityM anagerofTampa,12)TheOfficeofTheCity
M anagerofFt.Lauderdale,13)TheOfficeofStateAttorneyKatherineRundle,14)TheOffice
ofTheFloridaAttorneyGeneralAshleyMoody,15)TheDepartmentofHomelandSecurity,16)
TheOftk eofFloridaSenatorM areoRubio,17)OftkeofFloridaSenatorRickScott.
(EXHIBIT ''G'')
20
64.Thisactcaused imm ediate inquiry from branchesoftheFBland theirparented
prosecutorsatThe Departm entofJustice.Unable to discuss security m attersin greatdetailhere
on thedocket,thismultiple-agency rantby DefendantSilvaaccomplished the effectofthwarting
an undisclosed portion ofthe FBIinvestigation,forwhich the FBIm ade Plaintiffaw are of.
Plaintiffofferstoprovidethisassealed evidence to thiscourtunderpermission from thecourtat
anytim e so ordered.
65.ThisD efendant,an attonwy,hasabused m ultiple ConstitutionalRightsofthe Plaintiff
in an as-before-tm seen fashion and should be punished by the Judiciary and law enforcem entfor
thisheinous act.He has used State A ctorsasunw itting participantsin a stalking horse
obstruction ofJustice and m ustbe punished forthisact.PlaintiffrequestsThe Courtconsidera
sua sponte ruling to sanction thisD efendantim m ediately and preventhim in allw aysfrom
causing furtherharm tothePlaintiffand theJudiciary.
66.Defendants,targeting Plaintiff,on oraboutM arch 9 follow ed through on theirthreats
and ordered and released videoshosted by Y asser Serulle w ho m ade accusationsthatPlaintiffs
credentialswere fake,and thathe wasnota candidate forAmbassadorand otherwild accusations
and outrightlies.
67.M r.Serulle continued to releasethese videos aboutthe Plaintiffand individuals w ho
w ere inform ing 1aw enforcem entaboutD efendants,each becom ing m ore detrim entalto the
Plaintiff.Thevideosinclude,butarenotlim ited,contentofam an in drag portraying awoman
w ho w as giving ''anonym oustestim ony'

'aboutPlaintiffbeing ''dangerous''and having hurther,
stating Plaintiffwasa fraud and hiscam paign and credentialsw ere lies,thathe is a sexual
predatorand displaying his hom e,his m other'shom e and w ork addresses and phone num bers.
Thevideo claim she isnotaregisteredFARA agentwith TheDepartmentofJusticebutoddly

postshisregistration num beron the screen,and encouragesviewersto takeaction againstthe
Plaintiffathom e.The video displays the charges Plaintifffaced which he w asfully and
unanimously acquitted of,stating instead thathe holdsacriminalrecord forthisand thathe isa
''HistoralCriminal(sic)''.ThevideosmakenomentionofthefactthatPlaintiffwasfound
completely innocentofa11the chargeshewasaccused otllteven displaysan altered version of
the Jury vote sheetto deceive the public into believing Plaintiffhad been convicted ofthe crim es
he w as determ ined com pletely innocentof.The FB1m ade an im m ediate investigation ofthe
source ofthe ''anonym ous''video and concluded thatthe video w as rem iniscentoftactics used by
LatinAmericandrugcartelstointimidatecitizensand1aw enforcementofficials.(EXHIBIT ''H'')

68.On oraboutM arch 16,2019 Serulle explained in detailin tw o controlled phone calls
withan infonnantassistingthePlaintiff,in Spanish,how Mr.Trujillo'

srighthandmen inthe
enterprise,thatDefendantshereordered him to m akethevideos,how heobtained sealed court
recordsillegally,andscoffedatthisabuse,laughingoverit,jokingaboutit,furtherderidingthe
Plaintiff,and refusing to rem ove the illegalfootage despite adm itling in the phone callhis errors
in assembling thevideo,explaining'
.
69.ThatD efendantH ym an H ernandez ordered him to investigate Plaintiffand m ake the
slanderousvideos.
70.Thathe obtained sealed courtrecordsofPlaintiffschargesin the casePlaintiffwas
acquitted forillegally butdid notseeanywhereon the documentsastamp thatsaid ''sealed''.
71.H e then noted w hich docum enthe w asreferring to and the inform antlooked athis
own copy and instructed Serulleto look atthebottom ofthepageandhe could see itwasplainly
stampedassealedbytheQueens,New Yorkcriminalcourt.
72.DefendantSerulle show ed no rem orse forhis obscene acts and continued to defam e
and dim inish Plaintiffsreputation and characterduring thephonecall.
73.To defend him selffrom thisviciouspublic attack by Defendants,the Plaintiffreleased
his acquittalrecordsto the public to prove he was ilm ocentofthe charges,and also released
DefendantRamfisTrujillo'scriminalrecordsfrom TheStateofFlorida,somethinghehadnot
done before,despite having every opportunity to do so,because Plaintiffis a reasonable person.
74.ln February of2019 an inform antcooperating w ith Plaintiffalerted him thatThe
D efendants were aw are Plaintiffw asadvising the FBloftheiractivity and interview ing
w itnessesto those acts,and began a cam paign ofthreats againstthose w itnesses,displaying
altered and fake photographsofthe w itnessesw ith w ild accusationsalongside photographsofthe
Plaintiff.
75.Theinformant,unnam ed herebecauseofthreatsagainstinform ant'sperson,provided
evidencethatdefendantsRamfisTrujillo,CarlosSilva,MariaSilva,M ariaA,M ariaMercedes,

CarlosMcFarlane,M ariaJulia,FelixLugo,HilarioCastilloFranklinTrujillo,HymanHernandez,
Susan Senise,Jean D iaz,Cirilo M ata Dom inguez,W illinm Lora,Rodolfo Silva Contreras and a
large numberofJohn and Jane Does,so many thatthey are referredto only asthe ''Does
Umm mbered''hereto avoid confusion and redundancy,engaged among them selves,together
with and by theirauthority and theagreementofeach otherto launch an all-outassaulton
anybodyand everybody who even questionedtheirentem rise'sm otivesand agenda,and began a
seriesofConstitutionalRights abuses including:Tlzreatsto m urderinnocentpeople w ho stopped
donating m oney to theirfake politicalcam paign,harassm entagainsttheirchildren,harassm ent
againsttheir fam ilies,discrim inatory statem entsofrecord abouttheirvictim s assum ed sexual
preferences,ifthey are rich orpoor,theshapesoftheirbodies,coloroftheirskin,theirreligion,
andfartoomanyotherdisgustingtypesofdefnmationtolisthere.(EXHIBIT ''1')
76.DefendantRodolfoSilvaContreras(''JohnDoeUnnumbered'')isatop ''campaign
m anager''forthe fake politicalparty and holdsa title called ''ExternalSectorCybercrim es
lnvestigator''in whatiscalled the ''ExternalSector'ofthefakepoliticalcampaign.
77.HeisappointedbyDefendantRamfisTrujillo;Mr.Contrerashaspublishedmultiple
socialm edia postsin which explainshow to initiatefake ''takedowns''ofsocialm edia accounts
and threaten victim s ofthe scam he isappointed in thiscapacity to partake in.D efendantSilva
designed and distributed an ''online guide''to show others how to have socialm edia accounts
closed w ith false and defam atory claim sagainsttheirow ners,m any ofwhich are m ade possible
by the perpetratorelectronically signing an sworn statem entthattheirm ade-up claim sare true
underthepenaltyofperjury.ThisisaguidebooktoviolatetheirvictimsFirstandFifth
Amendment,andother,ConstitutionalRights.(EXHIBIT ''J'')
78.A 1lofD efendants,as prom oters,accountants,enforcers,and in otherpositions ofthe
enterprise,collectively instituted a system of slanderagainstthe Plaintiffthatrises to an
arrestable nature in w hich they pursued the narrative againstthe Plaintiffforthe public to view ,
and forthepurposeofobtainingtrem endoustinancialbenefitforthemselvesand hiding their
criminalactivity,includingwithoutlimitation(a)thefurthersolicitationandsalesofthefraud
schem e to itsvidim svia the false N azrative ofthe Plaintiff forthe long-term Gnancialbenefh of
Defendants,and additionalrevenuesfrom thesubstantialnew vidimsbroughtthereto by the
abhorrentN arrative,w hich portraysPlaintiffasa cotnlptsexualpredatorand fraud.
79.Plaintiffhad neverauthorized thatthe instantactivityand narrativeby Defendants
could be depicted in thisw ay.To the contrary,Plaintiffbelieved thatsuch activity,sealed under
courtorder w asreasonably proted ed,and Plaintiffhad a w ellfounded reasonable exped ation of,
atm inim um ,factualdepictionsofhisprivatelifeby Defendants,nottheoppositepurely

fabricated versionsofhisintimateactivitiesthattheDefendantsdistributed to thepublicw ith
w onton disregard forthe Law ,and reasonably believed thathis privacy w as safe and protected.
80.Plaintiffwasfalsely charged,arrested and completely exonerated both by a
unanimousjurydecisionandadismissalinThelnterestsofJusticein acriminalcasethatbegan
in 2015,on theallegationsofawoman who,upon inform ation and beliefisarelative ofm any of
the Defendants;thecase iswellknown,and the Defendantsobtained and utilized sealed court
recordsto abusetheConstitutionalRightsofthePlaintiffand makeitappearasifhewas
convicted ofthese false charges to destroy hislife.
81.Defendants'distribution ofthisnarrativeofPlaintiffconstitutesasham efuland
outrageous invasion ofPlaintiffsrightofprivacy by a group of am oralDefendants, m any
possessing felony crim inalrecords,who have no regard forhum an dignity and care only about
m axim izing theirrevenues and protitsatthe expense ofthe public.
82.Thislawsuitwasnecessitated by Defendants'blatantviolation of thepublictrustand
good,Plaintiffsrightofprivacy;theirwrongfuldisclosure oftheprivateactsthey depicted in
theirnarrative ofPlaintiffwhich they wereawarewerefalseand did so withoutregardforthe
Plaintiffsdignity asahum an beingon television, socialmediaand othermedium s;their
unauthorized com m ercialexploitation ofPlaintiffsnam e, image,identity and persona;upon their
discoveryofPlaintiffinvestigating theircrim inalenterprise--registered ata storagelocker;
Plaintiffsadvising theFBlofitsfindingsand Defendantspum osefully and knowingly
obstructing andtam peringwiththeinvestigations;theirattem ptto defmnePlaintiffand havehim
illegally prosecuted by sending abogusletterfrom the Silva& Silvalaw tirm toovereighteen
differentStateand Federalagenciesand othersto destroythereputation ofthePlaintiffand ruin
hiscareersothey could keep operating theirfraud, and in doing so using theState and Federal
25
governmentunwittingly asstalking horsesto Justice so asto deny Plaintiffand a11oftheir
victim stheirConstitutionalRights;plus othercalculated wrongfuland tortious conductas
described herein;some ofwhich featuresanti-semiticbehaviorandthreatswith weapons.
83.Defendants'maliciousconductviolatesPlaintiffsConstitutionaland Comm on Law
privacyrights,and exceedsa11measurementsofbasichumandecency. D efendants'gross and
egregiousintrusionsinto liberty,safety and privacy,isoverseen and orchestratedbya licensed
law firm in CoralG ables,FL,and m ustbe stopped,and m ustbe punished to the m axim tzm extent
ofthe law .
84.N um erous m edia outlets and w ebsiteshave picked up on the D efendant's fraudulent
Narrative and featurelinksto it,thusexposinghtmdredsofm illionsofpeopleto theN arrative.
A sa naturaland foreseeable consequence,m assive num bersofindividuals were draw n to the
N arrative,forw hich D efendantshave reaped trem endous revenuesand profits, and have been
unjustlyenrichedtherefrom intheirfraud,basedonboth ontheinstantviewership ofthe

N arrative and the illegalbusinessconduded by D efendant'sthereby, and the long term increase
in new victim stotheirfraud created by theNarrativeand Defendants'otheraffiliated promotions
and activities,and the revenuesand protitsassociated therewith foraprolonged period oftime.
Such trem endousbenefitsarea directresultofthecelebrity and goodwillofPlaintiffto The
Dom inican People,and the public'sinterestin hislifeand adivities.
85.Plaintiffhasdevoted atremendousnm ountofhistime and effortto developing his
reputation and goodwill,and such ishisbrand and bond asan individual. Such efforts have
created considerablecom mercialvaluein hisnam e,im age, identity andpersona.
86.Thecomm ercialvalueofPlaintiffsnam e,im age, identity and personaisdim inished
bytheunauthorized posting,publishing,distribution and dissemination ofthethisNarrative,

26
w hich isperceived unfavorably by the public and by the negative portrayalofPlaintiffin the
N arrative to the generalpublic.
87.Defendants'conductmanifestsadepraved disregard forPlaintiffslightsand an
unauthorized com m ercialexploitation ofhispublicity rights.
88.Plaintiffisinformedandbelievesandallegesthereonthatunlessenjoinedand
restrained,Defendantsw illcontinue to post,publish,distribute,dissem inate and exploitthe
N arrative,despite Plaintiffs num erousand repeated dem andsthatD efendantscease and desist,
and D efendants'clearviolation ofPlaintiffsrights.Such infringem entand violation ofPlaintiffs
rightsw illcontinue to cause Plaintiffsevere distressand dam age,forwhich there is no adequate
rem edy atlaw ,ifthe N anutive continuesto be posted,published,distributed,dissem inated and
exploited by the D efendants.Such conductand activity has caused and w illcontinue to cause
Plaintiffto sufferirreparable harm forwhich thereisno adequate remedy atlaw .
FIR ST CA U SE O F A CT IO N
(Invasion ofPrivacyby lntrusion Upon Seclusion AgainstAIIDefendants)

89.Plaintiffrepeats,re-alleges,adoptsand incorporateseach and every allegation
contained in Paragraphs 1through 88 inclusive as though fully setforth herein.
90.D efendants,w ithoutPlaintiffs consentand againstPlaintiffsw ill,have grossly
invaded Plaintiffsprotected rightsofprivacy asrecognized undertheUnited StatesConstitution,
Florida Constitution,and applicable com m on law ,by posting and publicly disclosing the
NarrativedepictingPlaintiffasconvictedofheinoussexualandfinancialcrimes(comzption)
w hich the D efendants knew wascom pletely false and pum osefully designed as a lie to gain
substantialadvantages.both econom ic and otherwise.
91.D efendants'posting,publishing,distributing,dissem inating and exploiting ofPlaintiff

27
thisw ay w asnotcarried outforreasonable orlegitim ate purposes,butratherto reap substantial
revenuesand profits and the expense ofPlaintiffand others.Plaintiffhad areasonable
expectation ofprivacy in theaccuratereporting offactwhen discussing hislife,notthe blatant
oppositeofthosefactsto destroy him and a11herepresentsand hasworked hard for;Plaintiffhad
no knowledge of,did notparticipate in,and did notconsentto,therecording ofthisintrusive
N arrative.
92.The unauthorized publication by Defendantsofthe Video,Video Excerpts and
NarrativeisoffensiveandobjectionabletoPlaintiff,andwouldbeoffensiveand objectionable
any reasonable person ofordinary sensibilities,and is notoflegitim ate public benefitorconcern.
In fact,ithasonly negative effects on the public because itis a blockage ofgovernm entaffairs
concerning com ity and security,and deceives and preyson the public.Plaintiffdid notconsentto
any use,distribution orexploitation by D efendants,orany otherpersons orentitiesofthe
N arrative orany portions orcontentthereof,w hatsoever,orto the creation,distribution and
exploitation ofthe N arrative.
g3.D efendants,som e lawyers,fully knew thatthe N arrative contained protected,private
and confidentialinform ation and content,and thatPlaintiffhad a reasonable expectation of
privacy in the depictionsmadeofhim by the Defendants,and thatDefendants'conductwould
shock the public w ith false data aboutPlaintiffwhich D efendantshad no rightto dissem inate,
disclose orexploit,and thatthe publication ofthese private factsw ould constitute a clear and
egregious violation ofPlaintiffsrightofprivacy.
94.D efendants violated Plaintiffsfundnm entalprivacy rightsby the conductalleged
herein,including the outrageous intnzsion into Plaintiffsprivacy and the publication,
dissem ination,and exploitation oftheNarrative in an unprivileged mannercalculated to

28
financiallycapitalizetherefrom,togarnerpublicitythroughouttheworld,andtounjustlyenrich
Defendantsin consciousdisregard ofPlaintiffsrightofprivacy aspartofan outrightcrim inal
fraud.
95.Plaintiffisinformed andbelievesand thereon allegesthatDefendantsacted with
actualmalice and recklessdisregard ofPlaintiffsrightofprivacy.
96.Defendantshavecontinued theirinvasion ofPlaintiffsrightofprivacy by continuing
todisseminateandposttheNarrative.Unlessanduntilenjoinedandrestrainedbyorderofthis
Court,D efendants'continued acts willcause Plaintiffto continue to incur severe and irreparable
injurythatcannotbeadequatelycompensatedbymonetarydamages.Byreasonoftheforegoing,
Plaintiffisentitledtoatemporaryrestraining orderandpreliminaryandpennanentinjunctive
reliefenjoiningthedistribution,disseminationanduseoftheNarrative,andallportionsand
contenttherefrom ,including withoutlim itation a11imagesintotalthereof,and theNarrative.
97.A s a directand proxim ate resultofthe aforem entioned acts by D efendants,Plaintiff
hassufferedinjury,damage,loss,harm,anxiety,embarrassment,humiliation,shameandsevere
em otionaldistress.Asa directand proxim ateresultofthe aforementioned adsby Defendants,
Plaintiffhasbeendamagedandwillbedamaged,inanamountsubjecttoproofandbelievedto
beatleastTwenty-FiveMillionDollars($25,000,000).
98.Plaintiffisinformed and believesand onthatbasisallegesthatthe aforementioned
actsofD efendants were done intentionally orw ith a consciousdisregard ofPlaintiffs rights,and
withtheintenttovex,injureorannoy,suchastoconstituteoppression,fraud,ormalice,thus
entitling Plaintiffto exem plaryand punitive damagesin an am ountappropriateto punish or
m akean exampleofDefendantsandto detersuch conductin the future,which amountwillbe
proved attrial.
29
SEC O N D C AU SE O F AC TIO N
(Publication ofPrivateFactsasAgainstAlIDefendants)
contained in Paragraphs 1 through 88 inclusive msthough fully setforth herein.
100.Defendantsdisclosed to the publicthecontentsofalteredconfidentialgovem ment
recordsdepicting Plaintiffin the exactopposite ofwhatthoserecordsare,claimingheisa sexual
predatorand dangerousto the public,when in fad heiscompletely innocentbytherecord.
Defendantsfullyknew thattherecordscontained theopposite depiction andwere privateand
confdentialinform ation,and thatPlaintiffhad a reasonable expectation ofprivacy againstsuch a
heinousassault,and thattheN arrative,designedusingPlaintiffscopyrightedm aterialand
withoutPlaintiffsknowledgeorconsent,would revealprivateand personalthingsaboutPlaintiff
which Defendantshad no rightto dissem inate,discloseorexploit,and thatthepublication of
theseprivatefactswouldbeoffensiveandobjectionabletoareasonablepersonofordinary
sensibilities.
101.Defendants'posting,publishing,distributing,dissem inating and exploiting of
Plaintiffwasnotcarried outforreasonableorlegitim atepurposes.Plaintiffhad areasonable
expectation ofprivacy in notbeing forced to endorse orsay favorablethings abouta fake
politicalcandidate,participate in fraud,orbeforced in anywayto do anything, and had no
know ledge of,and did notconsentto,the recording ofDefendant'sactivity. The unauthorized
publication by DefendantsoftheNarrativeand/oranyportionsorcontentthereotlisoffensive
andobjectionabletoPlaintiff,aswellastoanyreasonablepersonofordinarysensibilities,andis
notoflegitim atepublicconcern.Plaintiffdid notconsentto any use,distribution orexploitation
by Defendants,orany otherpersonsorentities, ofthe N arrative orany portions orcontent

30
thereof,w hatsoever.
102.Defendants,som e law yers,fully knew thatthe N anutive contained protected,private
and confidentialinformation and content,andthatPlaintiffhad areasonable expectation of
privacy in thedepictionsm adeofhim by theDefendants,and thatDefendants'conductwould
shock thepublicwith falsedataaboutPlaintiffwhich Defendantshad no rightto dissem inate,
disclose orexploit,and thatthe publication ofthese private factsw ould constitute a clearand
egregiousviolation ofPlaintiffsrightofprivacy.
103.D efendants violated Plaintiffsfundam entalprivacy rights by the conductalleged
herein,including the outrageousintrusion into Plaintiffsprivacy and the publication,
dissem ination,and exploitation ofthe N arrative in an unprivileged m annercalculated to
tinanciallycapitalizetherefrom,togam erpublicitythroughouttheworld,andtounjustlyenrich
D efendants in consciousdisregard ofPlaintiffsrightofprivacy aspartofan outrightcrim inal
fraud.
104.Plaintiffis inform ed and believesand thereon allegesthatD efendants acted w ith
actualmaliceand recklessdisregard forPlaintiffsrights.
105.D efendantshave continued their invasion ofPlaintiffsrightofprivacy by continuing
todisseminateandposttheNarrative.Unlessanduntilenjoinedandrestrainedbyorderofthis
Court,Defendants'continued actsw illcause Plaintiffto continue to incursevere and irreparable
injurythatcannotbeadequatelycompensatedbymonetarydnmages.Byreasonoftheforegoing,
Plaintiffisentitledtoatemporaryrestrainingorderandpreliminaryandpermanentinjunctive
reliefenjoiningthedistribution,dissemination anduseoftheNarrative,anda1lportionsand
contenttherefrom ,including w ithoutlim itation allim ages in totalthereof,and the N arrative.
106.Plaintiffisinform ed and believesand onthatbasisallegesthatthe aforementioned

actsofDefendantswere done intentionally orwith a consciousdisregard ofPlaintiffsrights, and
entitling Plaintiffto exem plary and punitive damagesin an am ountappropriateto punish or
m ake an exam ple ofDefendantsand to deter such conductin the future, which nm ountw illbe
proved attrial.
TH IR D C A USE O F AC TIO N
(Violation ofFloridaCommon Law RightofPublicityAgainstAlIDefendants)

107.Plaintiffrepeats,re-alleges,adoptsand incop orateseach and everyallegation
contained in Paragraphs 1 through 88,inclusive asthough fully setforth herein.
108.Plaintiffisthe m ostsought-afterpoliticalfigtlre in The D om inican Republic and is
such because ofthereputation hebuiltoverm orethan twentyyearsin actsofgoodwilland Faith
w hich the Defendantshave purposefully attem pted to destroy so they would notbe punished for
defrauding thepublic.
109.Defendants'unauthorized useofPlaintiffsnnm e, im age,identity and persona in
connectionwith theN arrativeconstitutesaviolation and misappropriation ofPlaintiffsrightof
publicity in thatDefendantsmisappropriated Plaintiffsname, likeness,im age,identity and
persona by using the N arrative forthe purpose ofcom m ercialgain, withoutPlaintiffseonsent.
Them isappropriation ofPlaintiffspublicityrightswasforDefendants'advantagein that
Plaintiffsnnme,likeness,im age,identity andpersonawereused and intendedto createand
enhanceDefendants'pecuniarygain and profit.
110.D efendantshave continued to use Plaintiffspublicity rightscontinuing to
disseminatetheNarrative,notwithstanding theirown knowledgethatitiscompletely and fully
false.UnlessanduntilenjoinedandrestrainedbyOrderofthisCourqDefendants'continuedacts
willcausePlaintiffsevereandirreparableinjurywhichcannotbeadequatelycompensatedby
m onetary dam ages.Plaintiffisentitled to a tem porary restraining orderand prelim inary and
permanentinjunctivereliefenjoiningthepublication,distribution,disseminationandusesand
portionsoftheNarrativewithoutlim itation.
111.Asa directand proxim ateresultoftheaforem entioned actsby Defendants,
Defendantshave earnedprofitsattributabletothistmauthorized comm ercialuseand exploitation
ofPlaintiffs nam e,im age and likeness.The am ountofsuch ill-gotten gainshad yetto be
ascertained.Plaintiffisentitledtorecoveral1saidunjustenrichment,includingallprofitsearned
by D efendantsasa resultofD efendants'unauthorized com m ercialexploitation as herein alleged.
112.M oreover,Plaintiffis entitled to seek and hereby does seek the m arketvalue ofthe
useofhispublicityrightsin the mannerin whieh they were eommercially exploited,without
Plaintiffspermissionandagainsthisstrenuousobjectionsandlegaldemands.
113.Asa directand pxoxim ateresultoftheaforem entioned actsby Defendants,Plaintiff
hassufferedinjury,damage,loss,harm,anxiety,embarrassment,humiliation,shame,andsevere
emotionaldistressinanamotmtsubjecttoproof,butbelievedtobeatleastTwentyFiveM illion
Dollars($25,000,000.00).
114.Plaintiffisinform ed and believesandon thatbasisallegesthattheaforem entioned
adsofDefendantsweredone intentionally orwith aconsciousdisregard ofPlaintiffsrights, and
entitling Plaintiffto exemplary and punitivedam agesin an am ountappropriatetopunish or
make an example ofDefendantsand todetersuch condud in thefuture, whieh am ountw illbe
proved attrial.
FO UR TH C AU SE O F A C TIO N
(lntentionallnlliction ofEmotionalDistressAgainstAIIDefendants)
contained in Paragraphs1through 88,inclusive asthough fully setforth herein.
116.Ata11timesherein,Defendantsacted intentionally and unreasonably in publishing,
distributing and dissem inating the N arrative w hen they knew orshould have known that
emotionaldistresswould likely result,notwithstandingtheirown knowledgethatitiscompletely
andfullyfalse.UnlessanduntilenjoinedandrestrainedbyOrderofthisCourt,Defendants'
continuedactswillcausePlaintiffsevereandirreparableinjurywhichcannotbeadequately
com pensated by m onetary dam ages.Plaintiffis entitled to a tem porary restraining order and
preliminaryandpermanentinjunctivereliefenjoiningthepublication,distribution,dissemination
and usesand portionsofthe N arrative w ithoutlim itation.
117.Defendants'conductwasintentionaland maliciousand doneforthepurpose of
causing,orw asknow n by Defendantsto likely eause,Plaintiffhum iliation,m entalanguish and
severe emotionaldistressand wasdonewith thewanton and recklessdisregard ofthe
consequencesto Plaintiff.
118.A sa proxim ate resultofthe aforem entioned w rongfulconduct,Plaintiffhas suffered
severeem otionaldistress,anxiety and worry.Plaintiffisinformed and believesand thereon
allegesthatDefendantsacted with actualm aliceand recklessdisregard ofPlaintiffsrights.
119.Defendantshave continued to use Plaintiffspublicity rights continuing to
dissem inatetheN arrative,notwithstanding theirown knowledgethatitiscompletely and fully
false.UnlessandtmtilenjoinedandrestrainedbyOrderofthisCourqDefendants'continuedads
willcausePlaintiffsevereand irreparableinjurywhichcannotbeadequatelycompensatedby
monetary dam ages.Plaintiffisentitled to atemporaryrestraining orderand preliminary and
permanentinjunctivereliefenjoiningthepublication,distribtition,disseminationandusesand
portionsoftheNarrativewithoutlim itation.
120.Asadirectand proximateresultoftheaforem entioned actsby Defendants,Plaintiff
hassufferedinjury,damage,loss,harm,anxiety,embanussment,humiliation,shame,andsevere
emotionaldistressinannmountsubjecttoproof,butbelievedtobeinnotlessthanTwentyFive
Million Dollars($25,000,000.00).
121.Plaintiffisinformed and believesand onthatbasisallegesthattheaforementioned
actsofDefendantsweredoneintentionallyorwith aconsciousdisregard ofPlaintiffsrights,and
withtheintenttovex,injureoramzoy,suchastoconstituteoppression,fraud,ormalice,thus
entitling Plaintiffto exem plary and punitive dam ages in an am otm tappropriate to punish or
makean exam pleofDefendantsand to detersuch conductin the future,which amountwillbe
proved attrial.
FIFTH C A USE O F A C TIO N
(NegligentInnictionofEmotionalDistressAgainstAIIDefendants)
122.Plaintiffrepeats,re-alleges,adoptsand incorporateseach and everyallegation
contained in Paragraphs 1 through 88,inclusive asthough f'

ully setforth herein.
123.Atalltimesherein,Defendantsactednegligently and unreasonably in publishing,
distributing and dissem inating theN arrative,notw ithstanding theirow n know ledge thatitis
com pletely and fully false..A s such,in doing the actsalleged herein above,D efendants acted
outrageously and beyond al1reasonable boundsofdecency,and inflicted em otionaldistressupon
Plaintiff,to his detrim ent.
124.D efendants'conductcaused Plaintiffhum iliation,m entalanguish and em otional

35
distressand wasdonewithoutregard forthe consequencesto Plaintiff.Asaproximateresultof
the aforem entioned w rongfulconduct,Plaintiffhas suffered severe em otionaldistress,anxiety
and w ony.
125.Plaintiffisinformed and believesand thereon allegesthatDefendantsacted with
actualmaliceand recklessdisregard ofPlaintiffsrights.
126.D efendantsare continuing theirinfliction ofem otionaldistress upon Plaintiff
Unlessand untilenjoinedandrestrainedbyorderofthisCourt,Defendants'continuedactswill
causePlaintifftocontinueto incursevereandirreparableinjurythatcannotadequatelybe
compensated by monetary damages.By reason oftheforegoing,Plaintiffisentitled to a
temporaryrestrainingorderandpreliminaryandpermanentinjunctivereliefenjoiningthe
publication,distribution,dissem ination and usesand portionsoftheNarrativewithoutlimitation.
127.Asa directand proxim ateresultofthe aforementioned actsby Defendants,Plaintiff
hassufferedinjury,damage,loss,harm,anxiety,embanussment,humiliation,
shnm e,and severe emotionaldistress.
SIX TH CA U SE O F A C TIO N
(CopyrightlnfringementAgainstAIIDefendants)
contained in Paragraphs 1through 33,inclusiveasthough fully setforth herein.
129.Plaintiffis the ow ner ofthe copyrightsin and to theN arrative.The N arrative is an
originalw ork ofauthorship thatm ay be eopyrighted underUnited Stateslaw .Plaintiffhas
complied with requirem entsofTitle 17 oftheUnited StatesCodewith respectto theregistration
ofthe copyrightin and to the V ideo,thereby entitling Plaintiffto asserthis rightsand privileges
in and to the N anutive.

36
130.W ithoutPlaintiffspennission,authorization orconsent,Defendantshave copied,
displayed,distributed,and reproduced theirillegalversion Narrative and portionsorcontent
thereot includingwithoutlimitation in everyform possibleontheinternetfortheentireworldto

see and fortheirow n illicitgains.
131.Plaintiffisinformed throughknowledgeand believesand based thereon allegesthat
Defendantsdid nothave pennission to create thisN arrative orany portion orcontentthereof,
including w ithoutlim itation any portion ofthe N arrative,forany purpose,including D efendants'
com mercialusethereofand creation and publication oftheN arrative.Plaintiffisinfonned by
know ledge and believesand based thereon allegesthatD efendants knew thatthey obtained the
contentand m anufactured the narrative from a third party w ithoutany rights orauthorization to
distribute it,and Defendantsknow ingly did notobtain any authorization from any alleged owner
ofthecopyrightsin and to theN arrativebeforepublishing and exploiting the Plaintiffthatway,
norand any portion ofcontentthereof,and before creating,publishing and exploiting the
N arrative and Plaintiffs life.
132.Plaintiffisinform ed and believesand based thereon alleges thatDefendantsknew
thattheiractionsconstituted copyrightinfringem ent.Such activitiesand conducthavecaused
Plaintiffinjury,forwhichheisentitledtorecoverunder17U.S.C.j504.Defendantshavealso
created derivative worksfrom theVideo,including withoutlimitation,bycreating and
distributing theNarrative and Plaintiffsim age.Defendants'actsare in violation oftheexclusive
rightsofthecopyrightholder,to wit,Plaintiff,to reproduce,distribute,display,and create
derivative worksfrom thatintellectualproperty,including photographic w orks,asarticulated in
17U.S.C.j106.
133.Defendants'conductwaswillfulwithin them eaning oftheCopyrightAct.Based
37
thereon,theawardofstatutorydamagesshouldbeenhancedin accordancewith l7U.S.C.j

504(c)(2).
134.Plaintif:aprose,isentitledtorecoverhislegalfeesandcostsofsuitpursuantto
TheFederalRulesofCivilProcedure and willseek such uponthedecision ofthiscourt.
135.DefendantsarecontinuingtoviolatePlaintiffscopyrights.Unlessanduntilenjoined
and restrained by orderofthis Court,D efendants'continued actsw illcause Plaintiffto continue
toincursevereandirreparableinjurywhichcannotadequatelybecompensatedbymonetary
dam ages.By reason ofthe foregoing,Plaintiffisentitled to atemporary restraining orderand
preliminaryandpennanentinjunctivereliefenjoiningthedistribution,disseminationanduseof
the N arrative,and allportions and contenttherefrom ,including w ithoutlim itation stillim ages
thereof,andtheNarrative,pursuantto 17U.S.C.j502.
SEV EN TH CA U SE O F A CTIO N
(StateTortofCivilConspiracyAgainstAlIDefendants)
136.Atalltimesherein,Defendantsacted intentionally and unreasonably in acom pletely
unlaw fulconspiracy by publishing,distributing and dissem inating the N arrative when they knew
or should have know n thatem otionaldistress would likely result,notw ithstanding theirow n
knowledgethatitiscompletelyandfullyfalse.UnlessanduntilenjoinedandrestrainedbyOrder
ofthisCourt,Defendants'continuedactswillcausePlaintiffsevereandirreparableinjurywhich
cannotbe adequately com pensated by m onetary dam ages.Plaintiffisentitled to a tem porary
restrainingorderandpreliminaryandpermanentinjunctivereliefenjoiningthepublication,
distribution,dissem ination and uses and portionsofthe N arrative withoutlim itation.
137.ThisN arrative w aspurposefully distributed w ith reckless indifferencesto Plaintiffs'

38
rightsand Defendantsconspired to retaliate againstPlaintiffsforPlaintiffsclearly established
FirstA m endm entconstitutionalrightto voice disapprovaloftheirillegaland unlaw fulacts.
138.D efendants,together,retaliated againstPlaintiffsby,threatening to have Plaintiff
imprisoned,sued,and destroy hisreputation with the very in-tunepublicatlargeand m any
branchesofTheUnited StatesGovernm entforwhich Defendantseeksapprovalto continuehis
life's w ork.
139.The actions underlying this conspiracy are illegalunderthe U nited States
Constitution asapplied totheStatesviatheFourteenth Am endm ent.
140.This deprivation undercolorofstate law isactionable under and m ay be redressed
by42U.S.C.51983and28U.S.C.j1367.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF W HEREFORE,plaintiffBenjaminF.Lagerstrom praysfor

judgmentagainstdefendantsLuisRamfisDominguezTrujillo,CarlosSilva,Silva& Silva
AttorneysatLaw,PartidoEsperanzaDemocratica,lnc.,FundacionRafaelLeonidasTrujillo
M olina lnc.,Barclay W ellington Inc,Fenix Fidelity Inc.,Proyecto LRDT lnc., Consilium
M obiliInc.,P.D .T.lnternationalGroup lnc.,W .D .D esign Stone Inc.,D& O Enterpriseslnc.,
DM G ProfessionalServicesCorp.,Greenup Serkiceslnc.,M atrix ConsultantCop .,Hilario
Castillo,FelizLugo,CiriloM atasDominguez,W illinm Lora,FranklinTrujillo,Jaime

Hernandez,Rodolfo Silva Contreras,YasserSerulleFerdinand,M aria LauraD.Silva,M aria
M ercedesDominguez,M ariaJuliaDom inguez,M ariaA.Dom inguez,CarlosJaim e
M cFarlane,M aria M .M cFarlane,Jean D iaz,Susan Senice,and the D OES U'

N NU M BERED,
(collectively,''Defendants'')andallegesasfollows:
AS TO THE FIRST THROUGH FOURTH CAUSES OF ACTION
1.For an award of generaland specialdam ages in an am ount notless than Tw enty

39
FiveM illion Dollars($25,000,000.00),togetherwithinterestthereonatthemaximum legal

rate-
2.For exem plary and punitive dam ages in an am ount appropriate to punish and set
an exam ple ofDefendants,and to detersuch conductin thefuture,the exactam ountofsuch
damagesissubjecttoproofattrial;
A S TO TH E FIFTH CA U SE O F A C TIO N
3.Foran award ofgeneraland specialdamages in an am ountnotless than Twenty
FiveM illion Dollars($25,000,000.00),togetherwith interestthereonatthemaximum legal

rate-
5
A S TO TH E SIX TH CA USE O F A CTIO N
4.Foranawardofdamagespursuantto 17U.S.C.j504.
5.Foran enhancem entofPlaintiffs statutory dam ages in accordance w ith 17 U .S.C.
j504(c)(2).
6.Foran awardofPlaintiffsattorneys'feesandcostsofsuitpursuantto 17U.S.C.j
A S TO TH E SEV ENTH CA U SE O F A C TIO N
7.For an aw ard of generaland specialdam ages in an am otm tnotless than Tw enty
FiveMillionDollars($25,000,000.00),togetherwith interestthereonatthemaximum legal

rate-
5
8.For exem plary and punitive dam ages in an am ount appropriate to punish and set
an exampleofDefendants,and to detersuch conductin thefuture,theexactamountofsuch
damagesissubjecttoproofattrial;
40
A S TO A LL C A USES O F A C TIO N
9.ForapreliminaryandpermanentinjunctionagainstDefendants,anda1lpersonsacting
on theirbehalforundertheircontrol,from anyand al1activitythatwouldcauseorhavethe
effectofdistributing,disseminating,publishing,displaying,posting forview oraccesson or
tllrough the lnternetorany otherm alm erorm edia outlet,broadcasting,transferring,licensing,
selling,offering to sellorlicense,orothem iseusing,exploiting orattemptingto exploit,the
N arrative orany portionsorcontentthereoforany copiesthereof,including w ithoutlim itation
the N arrative,in any and allform ats and m edia,including allelectronic and physicalm edia;
10.ForaJudgmentand Ordertransferringto Plaintiffany and a11ofDefendants'right,
title and interestin and to the N arrative,and allportions and contentthereof,including w ithout
lim itation the N arrative;
1l.Fora Judgm entand O rderrequiring the delivery to Plaintiffallcopiesofthe
Narrative,anda11portionsand contentthereofkincluding withoutlimitation the Nanutive,in a1l
formatsand a11fonnsofm edia,including electronic and physicalmedia,within Defendants'
possession,custody orcontrol,including w ithoutlim itation turning overto Plaintiffany and all
storagedevices(such asCDs,DVDS,harddrives,flashdrives,tapes,anddisks)containing
San3e'
5
12.Fora Judgm entand Orderrequiring D efendantsto tum over to Plaintiffa11
inform ation pertaining to the Narrative,including withoutlim itation,allactivity by allpersons
and entitiesrelated to thecreation,storage,transportation,editing,distributing,dissem inating,
publishing,displaying,posting forview oraccesson orthrough the Intem etorany other m anner
orm edia outlet,broadcasting,transfening,licensing,selling,offering to sellorlicense,or
otherwise using,exploiting orattem pting to exploit,the N arrative orany portionsorcontent

41
thereoforanycopiesthereotlincludingwithoutlimitationtheNarrative inanyanda11formats
and m edia,including a11electronicand physicalmedia.
13.Foraconstructivetrusttobe placed upon Defendantsand allpersonsacting on their
behalforundertheirdirection orcontrol,asto allrevenuesand profitsreceived by any such
individuals,including Defendants,to beheld forthe benefitofPlaintif: and to bedisgorged in

theirentirely to Plaintiff.
14.Forsuch otherreliefastheCourtmaydeem justandproper.

DEM A N D FO R JU RY TRIA L Pursuantto FRCP Rule 38 and the Seventh Am endm ent
totheUnitedStatesConstitution,plaintiffBenjaminF.Lagerstrom herebydemandsatrialby
juryonallissuessotriable.
D ate: B J IN LAG ER STRO M ,Pro Se

M iam i,Florid 529 W est29 StreetPH D
N ew York,N Y 10001
Phone:(347)237-8728
Fax:(646)330-3299
gabbygs887@ gmail.com
Case 1:19-cv-21775-RNS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2019 Page 1 of 42
E X H IB IT IIA fI
PLAINTIFF'S UNANIMOUS NOT GUllTV VERDICT

WAS KNOWN TO THE DEFENDANTS AS THEY
"STRIPPED" IMAGES FROM THE PAGE ANNOUNCING
IT, AND THE WOMAN WHO FASLEY ACCUSED
PLAINTIFF IS RELATED TO A LARGE SHARE OF
DEFENDANTS.
EXHIBIT "B"
THE STORAGE LOCKER DEFENDANTS REGISTERED

THEIR CORPORATION FROM AND OVER A DOZEN
OTHER FOR-PROFIT FLORIDA COMPANIES . .
Defendants continue to promote illegal fake political "fundraisers"

throughout Florida, New York, New Jersey and elsewhere to raise
"donations" for their fraud scheme. They run raffles for cars and
television sets to attract crowds of victims. They are in dispute over
persons who "won" a car but never received it.
Cena dC §ala con 'Ramfis

'11Jfiu. 9"ml$o for~• y •n.l
Advertisements for Miami, Orlando and Tampa, FL fake

political fundraisers.
Raffling off a television set at a fake political fundraiser in Tampa, FL.
{Defendant Ramfis Trujillo pictured on right.)
Proof of advertising and ticket sales for fake fun raisers.
Advertisement on right encourages victims to purchase raffle tickets to win a car.
The eras have not been delivered to the winners, and their ownership by the
Defendants is questionable.
EMPIRE CRUISE
36 at 299 South Street, New York, ............
Atenci6n Ramfistas !!!

Te lnvitamos .
Este Babado 25 De
Agosto
A Que Nos Acompaftes
En
La Caravana Rwnbo A
Boston. Massachusetts
Junto A Nuestro Lider

Ramfis Dominguez
Trujillo
. ..
Punto de Encuentro (A
Las10am)
181 st. Broadway Av.
SalieDdo A las 10nun
Transporte $30
Info: 347·299-7656
EXHIBIT "C"
VICTIMS OF THE FRAUD CONTACTED THE

DOMINICAN ELECTION BOARD WHO INFORMED
THEM VIA IT'S SECRETARY GENERAL THAT NO
ATTEMPT HAS EVER BEEN MADE TO REGISTER THE
FLORIDA CORPORATION "PARTIDO ESPERANZA
DEMOCRATICA" AS A POLITICAL PARTY THERE.
DEFENDANTS ARE WELL AWARE OF, AND EVEN

SHARE THEIR KNOWLEDGE BETWEEN EACH
OTHER, THAT DEFENDANT TRUJILLO IS NOT
ALLOWED TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT BY DOMINICAN
LAW.
l.E.XHIBIT "D"
DEFENDANTS, INCLUDING THE DEFENDANT RAMFIS TRUJILLO VIA HIS OWN

STATEMENTS, PROMOTE THAT DONALD TRUMP SUPPORTS HIS "CAMPAIGN"
FOR THE DOMINICAN PRESIDENCY AND IT'S "GOALS".
Defendant has used the same rhetoric on multiple occasions with statements
such as "I have a good friend in The White House ... and his administration ..."
Emphasis Added.
Defendants promoted the farce that "Washington" supports their fake campaign
and distributed the photograph of two law professors with Defendant Ramfis
Trujillo and a Dominican politician named lsmael Reyes; the men are believed to
be professors at New York Law School, where Mr. Reyes son recently graduated
Law School. The plaque in the background notes they are in the Law School.
Defendants have repeatedly represented they plan to seize control of The

Dominican Military including the Defendant and fake Presidential Candidate
Ramfis Trujillo who is born in The United States and is a natural United States
Citizen, in violation of The Logan Act and other Laws.
DIGITAL
· Ramfis dice Venezuela

neceslta "una pequena
intervenci6n" y estarla
dispuesto a enviar mllitares
domlnlcanos
Creado por: Merkiseded Avelino
00
EXHIBIT "E"
BENJAMIN IRISH
Candidate for U.S. Ambassador to The Dominican Republic
RNC Presidential Advisory Board Member
Presidential Honor Roll Recipient
Keynote Speaker, U.S. Christian Chaplains Association
February 28, 2019

NewYork,NY
NATIONAL SECURITY MATTER
I am writing to inform you of an emergency matter that is of great harm and

detriment to the good people of The United States and The State of Florida, and ask for
your immediate help to curtail this situation.
A traveling show promoted by a private organization whose known members have

criminal records and/or are illegal aliens is about to arrive in your State. The show is a
fake political campaign that urges large donations for a company which is not registered
as a political party and for a "candidate" for President of The Dominican Republic who
has been informed he is unallowed to run for this position due to his nationality and as
per the Dominican Constitution; furthermore he has never made an attempt to even
register for Dominican elections, and the registration deadline has long since expired.(l)
(SEE ATTACHED)
These events are outright fraud. My office has interviewed many multiple victims
of this scam, some of whom have "donated" thousands of dollars to this "political party",
and more egregiously, have had their lives threatened thereafter by it's organizers. I find it
personally disturbing that this fraud preys on the working poor, and all persons who have
been threatened are women. (SEE ATTACHED.)
Mr. Dominguez-Trujillo will be appearing in Miami, West Palm Beach, Tampa

and Ft. Lauderdale, beginning this week. The event portrays him as a Presidential
Candidate for the Dominican Political Party Partido Democratica Instututional ("P.D.I."),
however the party, with no filing as a political organization in the United States, removed
1
Mr. Trujillo from it's membership on February 26th, citing his inability to be their
Presidential Candidate.
My office has investigated this fraud for over two years. Mr. Trujillo's company,
The Partido Esperanza Democratica ("P.E.D.") is not a political party, rather a private
company registered in The State of Florida whose true business purpose is to influence
Dominican elections for private financial gain, including mining Dominican natural
resources in coordination with a company named "Mar Azul Gems" for private Chinese
corporations. The combined activities of these individuals are in severe and dangerous
violation to Federal national security laws. Some of these events feature Mr. Dominguez-
Trujillo falsely informing attendees that he is constant communication with President
Donald J. Trump and his son Eric Trump to overthrow The Dominican Government. (2)
These events draw spectators who are lied to and told donations to this phony
campaign will help to improve their impoverished nation by funding Mr. Trujillo's
election as The Dominican President.
I respectfully request your office cancel these scheduled events to protect our
citizens. Attached is a contact sheet detailing the ways to communicate with event
promoters and the facilities they are renting in abuse of the public for this fraud.
This letter is not, and is not intended to be, a full accounting of events and
circumstances; it is issued to your office by the agent listed below at this time due to
concerns of U.S. national security.
Please feel free to call me with any inquiries at (347) 237-8728.
Yours Truly,
Benjamin Irish, P.N.A.E.P.

Registered Agent, DOJ/FARA #6453
2
EXHIBIT "F"
ON OR ABOUT MARCH 7, 2019, PLAINTIFF ON SABOR

RADIO SHOW IN NEW YORK DISCUSSES DEFENDANTS
INELIGIBILITY TO BE DOMINICAN PRESIDENT, INTERVIEW
WAS NATIONAL NEWS PIECE IN DOMINICAN REPUBLIC.
@ Best Way to Rent a Car .1:1> x

in NYC?
Benjamfn Irish sugiere a

Donald Trump revelar a los
dominicanos delitos
cometidos por Ramfis
Trujillo
par Ramlro Estrella jueves 07 marzo 2019
G f ~ +
<J ,---_) LJ
EXHIBIT "G"
SILVA & SILVA

ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW
Marchl2,2019
Carlos E. Silva , Esq .

Jorge E. Si lva, Esq .
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL
Paul Jon Layne, Esq .
Benjamin Lagerstrom a.k.a. Benjamin Irish
Carolina B. Suarez, Esq .
We are in receipt ofyour correspondence dated February 28,2019. Please

be advised, the undersigned represents Mr. Ramfis Dominguez Trujillo. Mr.
Dominguez-Trujillo is a respected professional, person, and politician that has
spent his life building a positive reputation and career. Nevertheless, your
correspondence and public accusations demonstrate your malicious intent to tarnish
same through your unfounded, untrue and disturbing statements.
Under Florida law, it is unhiwful to make or publish ~ false statem~nt to a
third-party, resulting in harm to another's reputation. Further, such publication ;)f
libel is a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided ins. 775.082 or
s. 775.083. Fla. Stat. 836.01.
Similarly, New York defines defamation as a statement "which tends to
expose a person to hatred, contempt, or aversion or to induce an evil or unsavory
opinion in the minds of a substantial number of people in the community." Mencher
v. Chesley, 297 N.Y. 94,75 N.E.2d 257 (1947).
Your correspondence is full of Uliltrue, egregious and libelous statements for
which you have no evidence or support. Likewise, we have been made aware of
your public accusations on various public social media sites and radio . These
deliberate and malicious statements and accusations about Mr. Dominguez-Trujillo
are damaging to his professional and personal character. Specifically, your
allegations that Mr. Dominguez-Trujillo has committed fraud, is associated known
Terrorist Organizations, and is not a proper candidate in the Dominican Republic
are completely false.
Moreover, Mr. Dominguez-Trujillo is still the Presidential Candidate for the

Dominican Political Party Partido Democratica Instututional (''P.D.l") and has ,
never been informed by any entity that he is ineligible to run. Specifically, the Junta
Central Electoral de Ia Republica Dominicana's (JCE) public statement was " La
JCE informa que, basta Ia fecha, su Pleno no se encuentra apoderado ni se ha
236 Valencia Avenue, Coral Gables, FL 33134 ~
Phone: 305.445.0011 . Fax: 305.445.11811. info@silvasilva.com . www.silvasilva.com ~
/ Case 1:19-cv-21775-RNS Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2019 Page 22 of 42
pronunciado sobre inscripciones de propuestas de precandidaturas ni candidaturas

para las Elecciones del aiio 2020." Translated as "The JCE informs that, to date, its
Plenary is not empowered or has pronounced on inscriptions of .pre-candidacy
proposals or candidacies for the Election of the year 2020"
Notwithstanding, further review of your credentials resulted in the
discovery of your fraud. Not only do you hide behind an alias, namely "Benjamin
Irish", you are not an active registrant with DOJ/F ARA, and your "candidacy" for
U.S. Ambassador is a fa<;ade. Your real name is Benjamin Lagerstrom and you are
not a "Candidate for U.S. Ambassador to The Dominican Republic" because there
is no election for such a position. l).S. Ambassadors are appointed, not elected.
Additionally, we are aware that you have been put up to this to pursue another
candidate's interests. We do not know how much they are paying you in order to
_tarnish.ML Dominguez-Trujillo'.s_reputations, buL\~.kno..w .yaur intent. - - ·------
Additionally, your lies about being the "Registered Agent" through the
F ARA Unit is a lie, and no such association exists. Likewise, you provided a false
address in order to perpetuate your impersonation of a F ARA agent, specifically,
Benjamin Irish #6453 c/o U.S.D.O.J. FARA UNIT, The Department of Justice
Washington, DC. This false representation when drafting this correspondence is a
crime under 18 U.S. Code § 912: whoever falsely assumes or pretends to be an
officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any
department, agency or officer thereof, and acts as such ... shall be fined under this
title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
Your criminal arrests on charges of third-degree assault, unlawful
imprisonment, forcible touching, third-degree sexual assault and second-degree
verbal harassment is concerning. Your misrepresentation of your address
demonstrates your fear of getting caught in what is likely a scam for media
attention.
Your continued harassment of Mr. Dominguez-Trujillo will not be tolerated

and if you do not cease all related statements, cQmmnn!rat!ons, and/or
harassing telephone calls, a defamation of character lawsuit will be
I
commenced against you. Additionally, this letter shall serve as a pre-suit letter
demanding written assurance that you will cease and desist from making factually
untrue, unsupported, and damaging statements by March II, 20 I9.
In the event that you do not comply with this cease and desist
correspondence by the aforementioned date, a lawsuit may be filed to pursue all
available damages and legal remedie er the law for your defamation.
2
/
CC :
FBI Florida
FBI Washington
FBI New York
United States Secret Service
United States Department of State
The Office of the United States Inspector General
Florida Department of State
New York Department of State
Office of Governor Ron DeSantis
Office of the City Manager of Miami
Office of the City Manager of West Palm Beach
Office of the City Manager of Tampa
AC.C::"f> r;t.,
- ·-Cth<> ]\,{.,...,.,..,,¥ ~+'T.:'> _ l ,..,...1--..1 ~ 1 -
\,_J-!-±-J.'- · · '=:-I+~ . l::r".r.;;c;~
-- -------
Office of State Attorney Katherine Rundle

Florida Office of the Attorney General Ashley Moody
Department of Homeland Security
Office of Florida Senator Marco Rubio
Office of Florida Senator Rick Scott
3
EXHIBIT "H"
,•
'.·.1
·•·
.,
,·':
Defendants released a series of videos defaming and

threatening the Plaintiff and others.
This series are still pictures from a video made by Defendants about Plaintiff Lagerstrom .
Translations of the on screen text, a verbatim text of what is said by the "Anonymous Woman " in the
video, appear under the pictures. THE FIRST PICTURE HAS NO TRANSLATION TEXT, it is shown for its
marking to prove it was distributed on social media.
NO TEXT THIS PICTURE. "(Plaintiff) disrespected Ramfis Trujillo"
" ... Benjamin Irish is a fraud .. ." " ...he is a really dangerous person .. ."
"I agreed to be filmed anonymously." " .. .and it is evidenced he is unstable .. ."

"Yadira Marte affirmed he is a candidate ... " " .. .for U.S. Ambassador ... "
" .. .this is an absolute fraud ... " "His real name is Benjamin Finbar Lagerstrom."
"The problem is that he speaks many lies ..." " ... fraud to the people, creating false hopes."
"Do not fool yourself, this man is a fraud." "People are giving attention ... "
" ... manipulation and defames by slander ... " "This webpage is..."
1 · N.T.P.LilO.OOidliltoiM T'erc:Aif'ar.do
2 . N.V.P.U . ISS.OS Sf/CUHtfO 6a prtriOM ~
)•M.T,P.l t)0.5J'foOI,alfor'udoCOf'~tiP-
4 ·"-0.l1lOSS . . . . ,.SUII!et'ferolr(ifado
S•N.'f,,llo40.l6Mek'o....-...-.~Gr-*" o.oart"'*"lfl
u.s. l)lpalrtrMflt tiStaU,.. Unilotd SUtfl ~., MCke u.5.
-(OoO)f--
" ... having been processed for charges of third degree assault, false imprisonment..."
1 • N.T.I'. l UO.OO AMilo ~ f«nr GINo
l · N.Y.'-l l. llS.05St<uettro_.penol\ll ~ l · N.Y.P.U . IlS..OSStc~,~~Qtro O.pet"lliH litOfl
).I"'.Y.P.LJ)0.5:iTOQUotforPCiitC'Ofl~~ l·lt.Y.P.l llO.Slloqut forzlodo ~ NtAdOft sexual
4 · N,VJ';L UO SSIIHitlt ~- ~Orl6o 4 ·N.'I'.P.L l.JO 5.S Au1to ""'* ._, T..urGrtdo
5 ·N.V.P.l MU6 Aalto V.Wcn,..... Grldo
" ... forcible touching, third degree sexual assault and second degree verbal abuse ..."
" ... to attack this young political candidate ... " " ... with slander and accusations that are clearly false ... "
~~::==~~=::::=.---~~~--~--
~.,.--......... llf-~ ... ..,~.
n. ................... ......-. .. ksfUtl~oiC\"..u...tcW~

__.,
........ llll } ..... ofl'bilf ................. l iM . . toQII!Cft'aollJ.S. ......
...,_lhCIWntc.al . . •-w._,,~IIII(.WTI!J'l.Jl%1,
. ' '
' t ' ~ r ri • .. : I • (_
" .. of the Un ited States the Department of Justice .." " ... on social media, signing using 'DOJ/FARA #6453 .. "
-· Plfltw hle.tot~tll'*' w!dl fJ1ft ilrqllltftllll).f7) ll7·11:S.

-· ,..,._.lftfawwc.U•witll-r'-flirictac(.M1}:J1-t'll.
CC: F8l fklrill. FPIW........,_ C'C: FB1"-idll.fBtW..u.-

l,...s-ts.cr..~c..
lillilftt s - 5«rM Scrtb
u.-.s-ct~ots.w
UMMd~
llllitedSlllalf......... GcMrti
llwWIIiltHoa~t.......t.,enl
u....- s..n. '........ etfs.t
"'ft&ipulr ac.r.~
ne ww. no.w. •lpc-d sp
"This is not a registered number .. ." " ... that anyone can obtain when fulfilling ... "
"'.,..,..
I'~ kf ~ hl r•U ..w wid~_,. M!Quirics e1 (lol7) Z)1·1'21.
" .. .foreign agent in The United States ... " "says he is a 'Candidate for U.S. Ambassador ... "
,._,.lit. 2019
ScwV~. NY
NAT IO NA l $CCUI I TX MAII&R N&IIQNAL st;CUIITY Mc!,IIEB
l~m wrililftO•hmyo.or. . .,._.y ...... thMI.otsmt..,....SMimtnl10
" ... a position that does not exist ... " " ...and lower, a member of Congress ... "
" .. .Just call the Department of Justice ... " " .. .In the USA directly at 202-XXX-XXXX ... "
"Really, he uses the DOJ/FARA office ... " " ... and their official address, to intimidate the people ... "
" ... so they believe it triggers an official capacity ... and this is a serious crime .. ."
" ... his home address is ... " " .. .(DEFENDANTS PUBLISHED HOME ADDRESS) ..."
"for the Government of The United States .. ." " ... and its confirmed he does not have links with this ... "
fd!rult}' lt. 2019

Ntw Yorio:. NY
NATIONAl. SI:CURITY ~IATlt• R
1am writi•lct iDI'orm yoa oft• ~mill« I..._ it of' pelf hum and decrinw:N.CO
. .
( \I ' lj !t ' ( ~ ' I {] ' l I ' l ~ j '~
" ... Presidential consultant of (the) RNC. .. " "I called the Department of Justice directly... "
" ... office and its confirmed he is not at all affiliated ... with the actual administration ... "
" ... he has two cell phones registered, they are .. ." " ...Record this video to be able to reach Mr. Trujillo ..."
" ... and provide this information together with .. . the complete dossier I have managed to assemble ..."
" .. .in relation to this sinister charlatan ... " "I urge anyone who is watching this video to send this
information to Mr. Trujillo by any means possible ... "

"This man is dangerous and needs to be arrested."
Below are sample displays of the public reaction and dangerous effect this illegal slander is having of
the Plaintiff, via comments from social media fanatics. As one can see, they are sharing Plaintiff's
personal and private information so as to attack him.
VIVA El ONICO HOMBRE CON COJONES

ElGENERALISIMO TRlJJILLO.. ViVA Palan te con rrah fi 2o2o
RAMAS OOMINGUEZ TRlJJILLO PROXIMO k dlgan lo k kieran del nieto de e! j ete k mi
PRESIDENTE El2020 .,.ABAJO LOS bol o es por el Antonio Jimenez • 1 month ago
COMUNISTAS MALDITOS
Luisa Del villar • 1 month ago
•
.
Jesus Perez • 1 month ago
•• 4
RAMFIS2020
•
(347)237· 872 al mlnuto Jack Sferra 2020 • 1 month ago
Jajaa jajaa jajaa jaj aa jajaa 4:52 H ve 111 nliiiMnl t.lef6nlco.
Arriba Ramfis Dominguez.Trujillo
presidente!L
•• 2
•
.
Sobelda Cabrera • 1 month ago
.
Blackheartlov • 1 month ago
Ill
Pues que
los metan en Ia carcel,por
dellncuentes.
Rosario Benitez • 1 month ago
!! Que papelazo I! Un defensor del nleto del

dictador respondiendo. !I
.• , •• Q3
.. ,
Juan Contreras • 1 month ago
••
VIEW 3 REPLIES
VIEW 3 REPLIES @Luisa Loni Jajajajajajajaja. los Trujillistas

estan locos. quieren voiver a ver sangre
en mi patrla. pero eso no se va poder. ya
mucha gente sabe que Ramfis Trujillo no es
La batalla anti Trujllllsta esta ganada. mas que un ladr6n, delincuente y corrupto.
Ramfis Trujillo esta acabado.
.• , ..
Read more
Tommy Dominguez • 1 month age
Tommy Dominguez • 1 month ago
El delincuente es Ramfis Trujillo y sus

•• •• qs
VIEW 8 REPLIES
seguidores. l os Trujillistas son asesinos de
nacimiento.
I c [~
Defendants continue to make videos that defame Plaintiff as

a sexual criminal and otherwise including use of the group
Anonymous' logo to incite fear. They blatantly post these
videos on their official campaign social media account.
0 62 34 comentarlos • 66 veces comperticfo
rfj Megusta
A,\IIana Estrella le gusta Hallmark.

EXHIBIT "I"
Defendants continue to release videos and

photographic creations that threaten and defame their
victims based on their ethnicity, religious beliefs and
violence, and have designed an online video guide
they send to one another to teach others how to
initiate fake social media "takedown notices", a guide
to violating The Constitution:
• JIICkSiem
El mlsmo lntierno ?por
comentwto de Madelln Estrella por dlos....
ecoeo. Ellos tlenen problemas
marltales ...
PocoAmor..
2h Me gusta Responder
~· Bloquear a Mlldelin
Vano poc!tin - ~~ COl' I 18
Rot.t P..Jta Rodriguez
Jack Sierra
'·
-
.
~~- ~·_ ......
. =-==-
~~~~.,.
repor1asce. Como tnfl'lngia
---
11 - -
~-
~...!:.!~ .
55 min Me gusta
- · - - - - · ' - ' - - ... -.....~ ..... tft-.-- t
Pictures of the guide to fraudulently remove victims social media accounts being
shared on Facebook Messenger.
Video and Picture Defamation Examples:
" ... Tania Munoz the Gorilla ... " "This is a gross gorilla."
Mrs. Munoz in side by side comparisons with a baby monkey and a cow.
II ••• Carmen Perez is a traitor... II
Mrs. Perez being degraded for her body shape and an alleged surgery.
.,... Cl (j ( j ( j 0 {.~ 1 • I
Defendants release pictorial work meant to shame their victims on the basis of
their physical appearances and political viewpoints.
Defendants release videos and pictorial work that calls for assassinations against
their enemies, filmed in the United States of America. Jane Doe Yvette claims she
is dangerous because she is Muslim, and threatens to shoot her victim in the
headt They regularly release records they obtain in calls for action to their
followers showing them where their intended victims live and work.
Defendants enlist publicly their followers to achieve these crimes.

EXHIBIT "J"
Defendants continue to release videos and

photographic creations that threaten and defame their
victims based on their ethnicity, religious beliefs and
violence, and have designed an online video guide
they send to one another to teach others how to
initiate fake social media "takedown notices", a guide
to violating The Constitution:
• JIICk Slaml
El mlsmo lnfierno ?por
dlos....
Ellos tlenen problemas
marftales...
PocoAmor..
2h Me gusta Responder
1.• BloQuear a Madelin
V• M I>C)drln ,.."* ''<""~l.tlc.t!
~ Sofieltaf revisiOn
..,...,.......
~oequipo<ietwW -a
-. ====- .
~
-
55 min Me gusta
Pictures of the guide to fraudulently remove victims social media accounts being
shared on Facebook Messenger.
Video and Picture Defamation Examples:
" ... Tania Munoz the Gorilla ... " "This is a gross gorilla."
Mrs. Munoz in side by side comparisons with a baby monkey and a cow.
" ... Carmen Perez is a traitor... "
Mrs. Perez being degraded for her body shape and an alleged surgery .
...... c::1 rl r. rl c ··~ ,• .
Defendants release pictorial work meant to shame their victims on the basis of
their physical appearances and political viewpoints.
Defendants release videos and pictorial work that calls for assassinations against
their enemies, filmed in the United States of America. Jane Doe Yvette claims she
is dangerous because she is Muslim, and threatens to shoot her victim in the
headt They regularly release records they obtain in calls for action to their
followers showing them where their intended victims live and work.
Defendants enlist publicly their followers, to achieve these crimes.

JS44 (Rev,06/17)FLSD Revised06/01/2017 CIW L CO VER SH EET 19-cv-21775-Scola/Torres
'
TheJS44 civilcoversheetand theinformationcontained hereipneitherreplacenorsupplementthefilingand serviceofpleadingsorotherpapersasrequiredby lam exceptas
prqvidedbylocalr
ylesofcourt.Thisfol'
m approvedbytheJudlcialConferenceoftheUnitedSttesinSeptember1974 isrequiredfortheusepfthççlerkofCourtforthepumose
oflnitiatingthecivlldocketsheet, A'
EEINLTRUCTIONStlAtyép
#7'zu(
. JJ'OFTH1sF()R&âNOTICE:AqerneysMUST InkiiiteAl1Rerfi
ledCaseiBelow.
1.(a) PLAINTIFFS .1 rn n & EFENDANTS
ZN.s , ,.V ' *' e-/u m -'v' & v?ï R F/.I 4/ +z .
Mlt11 ' pzp A f p.d D o .g z .
(b) CountyofResidenceofFirstListedPlainti u1t,
yofResi
denceofFirstListedDefendant
(EXCEPTINU.
s.J'
IAWT FCAsEs) ANGEG Q. NOBV (IN U.
S.PI
AINTIFFCZ
HSJONLT
n1>qK U.S Dlc c '
I'
E: I'
NLANflCONDENINATION CASES,USETHELOCATION OF
4'DVQFFG.-Ml***I TI
!ETM CT0FLANDINVOLVED,
(c) Attorneys(nrmName,zgt/pz.
e.
r
.
r,anaTelephone . ttorneysFfh-nown)
F> 5e # /a,,
% 6 S ,(.6+ 4* .4n /8'/2-t''o5-'
D <'%'*tT'Dt-WA /Tr&1X
wzk, > . r# .f pawy lnoot 'W J * Zz*'/YMf2'4 .cA &fS:R z$
Fc ont, . (.36/
(dlcbec ountyW hereActionM e:#7m d '
X MI
.
z,
F /t- tCOTJ
AMI.DME Q MONROE QBROWARDE1PALMBEACH MARTINQST.LUCIE QI
/@-f-&0//
NSIANMVERQOKEECHOBEEQHIGHLANDS
II. BASIS OF JURISDICTIO N (Pl
acean'A''fnoneaoxonl
y) 111.CITIZENSH IP O F PRINCIPAL PA RTIES (Placean' w 'inoneaoxforplaint@
(ForDf
verl/
l
yCasesOnl
y) andOneBoxforDe fendant
)
1
Z1 l U,
S.Govelmment E13 FederalQuestion PTF DEF PTF DEF
Plai
ntifr /
1/.
& GovernmenlNotaJkry? ' Ci
tizenofn i
sState E1l 1 IncomoratedorPrincipalPlace E14 4
orBusinessIn'rhisState
L 2 U,S.Government 4 Diversity Ci
ti
zenofAnotherState 2 (
Zl lncorporatedandPri
nci
palPlace 1 5
Defendant (lndicateCiti
zenshi
pofparti
esinltem111
) ofBtuqinessInAnotherState
Citi
zenorSubjectofa 13 D ForeignNation E1 6 C16
ForeignCountry
IV. N A T U RE O F SU IT (Placean 'x''inoneBoxtpajy z cnckhereror:Natu,r
.e
.ofsuitCodeDescriy. -.mm tions
t
è
;
:
L
:
..
'
7
C
T
L
:
s:
7
î
)
-i
'
i
u
a
,
-;
:
:
2
'/
'
-
,
k
'
t
l1'
k-
/
'
1
)
:
%r
-
'
.
t
l$
i
j.
.
-
..
q
it
j
i
.
-
)
.'
1
,'
-
ii
1
(
..i
--i
..l
./
i
l
i
.
-
.t
j
.q
-i
.g
-q
-
i-
.;
l
%
v
:
'
.h
.
iT'
ï
'
zp
-
.
tî
i
r
ué
'
(
)
k
t
Jq
'
è
é
t
k7
I
I
u
k
yJ
r
é
-
sî
!
r
'
ar
w
u'
q
:
)
pJ
?r
j
i
q7;
ru'l'
#u7
q
x
t
i)
éq
X1
a
d q
klk
,
z:
4
,J
T
:
J
1
.r7
-
1
. '
ak
-
u
; q
/
q
.v
%
.ï
r
.
.
s
%
.q
;
'
l
,
t
z
.)
(
7
c
lr
;
j
ù
-;
x
.i
-t
j
;
,
.
.1
i
(
.
-'
f.j
- 7
-
.
-7
l7
c
.!
>!
TC
r
/
$)
'
$
7
.
asV7
tx
-- 7
.ws
:R
jk
.à
a
;ï
#
1
L
.
t
jL
l
.t
t!
7
I
:
.
,
.J
N
i
.
x
=F
V
'
. J
C
J
u..
. a
'
.j
ql
4
(
k(
sq
4
!
.
.ï
'
)
;
.
wë
jr
.
q
)
R'
4
-
J-'
i
t
=j
.
.i
(
-j
i
!
i
.
-l
-i
k%
--
...-X
-
Y
-
-
-G
'
.-
..-'
t
--
'
..
.
vj
.x
--A
'
.
-
.-ï
i
.l
-.
#
;
j
-
.
-(
7
.
.A
-
i
g
.i
7
:
h
.
a
.
1i
;
t)
kW
t
.ir
uz
qqCE
=.:
'
j;
è)
y..j!.)
i.
j
)
Ii
-:
.
.
-
.I
;
.
i
-
.
-r
yvj
-
.z
u
a-.
j
.o
-a.,.
u
a.j
y
u
.
,j
.
-y
ayj
u.4-y
y
-o
.jyy
syyy .,
...
s..
,
a
..y
,.w
.s.....a
..y
.j
x
.xj
.
g
..
y .
IZIl10Inslrance PERSONAL INJURY PERSONALINJURY I ZI625DrugRel atedSeizure IZI422Aqpea!28USC 158 IZI375FalstClai msAct
IZI120Marine E1310Airplane IZI365PersonalInjtuy - ofProperty21USC881 Q 423Wlthdrawal Z1376QG Tam (31USC
1:1130Mill erAct E1315AirplaneProduct ProductLiabili ty IZI690Other 28USC 157 3729(.))
IZIl40Negotiabl eInstrument Liabi lity E:l367Hea1 thCare/ U 400StattReapportiomnent
IZIl50Recove:yofOverpayment IZI320Assatll taLi bel& Pharmaceutical (rè
L 7'èV
. 'y
%-
#.'..kök= .u:AW
.... u= .''.. ,W
'
.' JA
.k=..
wkJ # >-'1
jj
z.
Y
' 7$'Z 410Antitnk st
& EnforcementofJudgnwnt slander PersonalInjtuy I
ZI820Copm'ghts I
ZI430BanksandBanking
1:115lMedi careAct IZI330FedemlEmployers' ProductLiab- lhty Q 830Patent U 450Commerce
I:EIl52RecoveryofDzfaulted' Lïahilft y IZI368Asbest osPersonaI (ax;835 wPor ateungtAp
-Apbjb cra
euyoin
ated I :Z 460Depolati on
studentLoans IZI340Marine InjuryProduct Q 840Trademark E1470ltacketeerInfluencedand
(Exci.veterans)
EEI153RecoveryofOvtrpayment
E1345Ma rinle
Liabi ity
Product Liabil ity V:. V
'l zl
i6
S
T
I%
.
7O
7.
lï
7j
,
r.
.
PERSONALPROPERTY CI710Fau'LagorStandarbs E1jdiiiiV(1à95ff)
,t
-
7
q
1
.L
-C.
AVh
M K-O- ftV.iJV
l
.V7t TUV
-,jf
S.
YkI,
z
V;'.Fuls
)
X
'.. Oa
-.'
x
-U=W
x'. LJS.YCU ..X.
-I'5
.'
..
Y -J.RZ.. 1
jZ 4 Co nuptOrganizat
80CovumerCredit
ions
ofVeteran'sBeneGts D 350MotorVehicl e IZI370OtherFraud Act Q 862BlackLtmg(923) E:l490Cabl e/satW
IZIl60Stockhol ders'Suits Z1355MotorVehicle CEI371TruthinLending I ::I720LaborN gmt.Relations (ZI863DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) C:l850Secudtfes/commodf tf
es/
IZIl90OtherContract ProductLiability (E1 380OtherPersonal (Zl740Rail wayLaborAct Q 864SSID Ti tleX- V1 Exchange
C1l95ConeactProductLiabil ity EI360OtherPersonal PropertyDamage E1751FamilyandMedical Q 865RSI(405(g)) E1 890OtherStatutoryActi ons
E1l96Fmnchi se Injury !Zl385PropertyDamage LeaveAct E189lAgri culturalActs
E1362Personallnjtuy- ProductLiabi lity IZI790OtherLaborLi tigation Z 893Envi romrmnGlMatlers
Med Malpractke IZI79IEmpl.Ret.Inc. Cl895Freedom ofInformatïon
3'
7 -'
L1 -
'
:
vi
r..
r.
iùxz zdjax
uan uonuoey
-jxw
mn atl .iLù
on) q;;
s
.è
u
rv
-r
-
. ....r
'g
q
..
t
r
,'
4 yl
s
4
--.
t
0j
l
btw'
-.
ï t
k
-.
.
et
..
r 0la.-
.l
t
.
vtj
l'
l.mi
...-
Zg i'
. 7
.
i
t:
-
.
s.
;r
'
c
,r
..
:'
r
..
,
-n
g
:
sh
;-
'
p
'
l
i
r
-
.
.!'t
i..t
ï
-.j
I ,-ö
i-a ie 1
,
..
. ...1
r
.7
a48
.:
s .:
.;..,'
t' #r
j.o x
.e
.
pf
.wî
-.
u-
..
s ..
: .t
, wj
--
,
- s
....
-kr
-'. secur
. ityAct r
,.J
.Q ,r
ù
,Tk
.
i/ù'
--
àz )i
'
-E
.Y .-
a.
xU'
.e
- -.
s t
-.
(.
t7j
i-
..
j'
à.
--'
xl'
. i-à
.
a'
.
lt
.
n'
ï
.t
'
I
-
t
l'
r
,
it
-i
i K
.-/
'
.è-.
.-.'
L
ù7
,(:l8A9c6tArbi%tion
Z 220Forecl osure 44IVoti ng IZI463AlienDetainee orDef endant) Z 899AdministrativtProczdure
I:J230RentLeasr& Ejectment E1442Employmenl E1s 5r1n0tenMo ceti ons to Vacat e gaUS871 C7I R0S9-RNM Part.
6 y 26 Actmzuew orAppealof
C1240TortqtoLand I: Zac
443xHmmod
ousi nga/tions Otber: ABenoyoecujon
'î
I
:1245TorîProductLiability :'
îLs-h
l.: (n
I:Z445Amer.wcisabili ties- E1530General 1
)
;
( $;
' '
.;
s.t,ëjj, ;.
)
ysyuq:, .
y,.
.r.
'
x,
4:;
,
uo;oM
r
jg
d)
(d:
rj
j!ç
l .
.
j
)
.t
a.u:,t.s.uyxy,.o:jqsy.
juytli
lfl
z statute(
s)t
l
kE
;
(:1 290Al1OtherRealProperty Employment Z1535DeathPenal ty C1â62MahuahzatlonApplmatlon
El446Amer.wcisabil ities- 1:1540Mandamus& Other C1465OtherImmigz ation
Otl wr E1550CivilRights Actions
E1448Educati on (:1555MsonCondition
560CivilDetainee-
I
ZIC ondi
Consnement
ti onsof
V'1 ORI
origGI
inaN
l (a 2(PI ulac
moea
vned,'x''I i
no
a 3neRe B-osxleödntp?IUI 4 Reinst at ed Transferrqdfrom D 6Mulidi strict j uj7 Appralto ID 8 s(j tjduuot jumant utjsom
Proçeeding &omstate
c (seevl or (asnot
pe l
cy
tt
jrbdlstrict Li
Tr tig
ansat
fl
o
er n D is trict Ju d ge L t
i
t!
,ltio n z9 Appenatecourt
ourt below) Reopened Jud ment
fromMagistrate -j:rect
File
VI. RELATED/ (Seeinstructions):a)Re-filedCase nYES O b)RelatedCases DYES NO
RE-FILED CASEIS) JUDGE: DOCKE UMBER:
CitetheU.
S,Ci
vilStatuteunderwhichyouarefilingandW riteaBriefStatementQfCause (Donotcf
/e.
/il
rfyt
ffcft
,at
ll.
çffzfl
//ev
.unleast
fvezwfèz:
VII.CAUSEOFACTION/L%ENGTH
H COF/f/J UiCd/aJ
TRIAL via
JS XS'Lt2 J.(C'v/Jy/
ysestlmated(forbothsidest tryentirecase)
J F/a.(ë
'./j3/;#uJ jf()e
V11I.REQUESTED IN Q CHECKIFTHISISACLASSACTION DEMAND & CHECKYESonlyifdemandedincomplaint:
COM PLAINT: UNDERF.R.C.P.23 .
p<
U>? '' 'R& Jtmv DEMAND: Yes ElNo
ABOVE INFORMATtON IsTRUE & colm Ec'rTo THE BEST oF m 'IG o LEDGE
DATE SIGNATURE oltxEvoF
FOR OFFICE USE NLY

RECEIPT # AMOLJNT JUDGE MAG JUDGE

Benjamin Irish v. Ramfis Trujillo, CMP, EXB, CCV

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Benjamin Irish v. Ramfis Trujillo, CMP, EXB, CCV

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Case 1:19-cv-21775-RNS Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2019 Page 1 of 41

UN ITED STA TES D ISTR IC T C O U RT SO UTH E RN DISTR ICT O F FLO R IDA

LuisRamfisDominguezTrujillo,CarlosSilva, C O N STITU TIO N A L RIG H TS

Consilitlm M obiliInc.,P.D .T.lnternationalGroup lnc., W .D .Design StoneInc.,D&O

EnterprisesInc.,DM G ProfessionalServicesCop .,Greenup Serviceslnc., M atrix Consultant

Com .),Hilario Castillo,Felix Lugo,CiriloM atasDominguez,W illiam Lora,Franklin Trujillo,

M aria M ercedesDominguez,M ariaJulia Dom inguez,M ariaA . D om inguez,CarlosJaim e

M cFarlane,M aria M .M cFarlane,Jean D iaz,Susan Senice, and the D O ES UN N UM BER ED ,

2.D efendants have engaged in intentional,outrageous, irresponsible and despicable

conductby designing and displaying on theinternet, television and in paid-forprinted materials

ashaving a crim inalrecord including sexualassault, false im prisonm ent,stalking,forcible

touching,and m ore,accom panied by graphic narrativesthatdescribe him as a crim inaland are

m adeby awom an believedto berelated to m any oftheDefendantsforwhich hewasfully

M illions'';Defendantsdesigned an onlineguideto comm itthesecrimesandencouragetheir

followersto do samewhich isexhibited in evidence,actually swearing in by oath ''discipline

directors''and ''externalsectorbosses''to theirprivate com orationsto achievethis.

3.The motivebehindthisviciousand unintelligentassaulton PlaintiffbyDefendantsis

becausethey areengaged in ablatantly criminalfraud scheme utilizing for-profh companies

registered in Floridato deceivethepublicand profitfrom a fakepoliticalcampaign prom oting a

fake Dom inican presidentialcandidate, whenneitherisregistered oreligible,andthepartieshave

anything and eveN hingto continueit,including threatening thelivesofit'svictim spublicly.

reputationsofTheUnited StatesGovernmentand The Governm entsofothernations,their

nationalsecurity concerns,rightfuland pum osed appointm entsand considerations,their

urgentm attersrelated directly to the Plaintiff,as show n herein.

4.On M arch 12,2019,following meetingsand deliberations,theDefendants,including

governm entagencies,ofticials,asw ellasothers,defam ing the Plaintiffas described above and

making com pletely false statem entsabouthislegitim ate credentialsfortheirown illidtgains.

5.Theletterwasalso mailedto personsin the Dom inican politicaldiasporain TheUnited

Stateswho Defendantsbelieved were ''ratting''them tlzrough thePlaintiffto the FederalBureau

7.Plaintiffisacandidatefortheposition ofUnited StatesAmbassadorto TheDominican

Republic,confirm ed in consideration through com munication with The W hiteHouse and

2018 keynote speakerforThe U.S.Christian ChaplainsAssociation;hisprivatework, critically

relatedto hispublicim age,includesintervention on the behalfofVenezuelan Sum eme Court

Judiciarym emberstargeted forassassination by dictatorNicholasM aduro, representing in-lobby

to TheUnityAgreementBetweenNations,atreaty between TheDom inican Republicand The

United States;endorsing,cnmpaigning,and working with awidevariety ofpoliticalcandidates

includingthosewho areRepublicans,Dem ocratsand lndependentsin Floridaand New York,

intervention in m attersofcivilunrestin TheDominican Republicalongside United StatesDN C

8.Plaintiffisahousehold namein The Dom inican Republicbecauseofhis

accom plishm entsthere,and hoststhelargestsocialmediaaudience in the nation, having reached

im ageand likenessal'edepicted in m uralsthroughouttheLatin Am erican nation on thesidesof

buildings,discussinghispublic battleswith com munistsincluding dictatorNicholasM aduro.

Plaintiffhasbeen received by oftk ialsand representativesofm any nationsin North Americafor

his unpaid w ork.

9.Plaintiffis the m ostsought-afterpoliticalendorsem entin The D om inican Republiv.

10.On Decem ber23,2018Plaintiffgavehis''StateofThe Dom inican Republic''speech

which wasviewed byoveronemillion Dom inicansand aired alongsidetheDom inican President

Danilo M edina'ssimilarevent,with thePlaintiffattracting an audienceten timeslargerthan the

actualD om inican Presidentin his own country;

11.Plaintiffrefused to endorse anybody fortheDom inican Presidencyinthe speech

calling them ''a11abunch ofcrooks''andarmounced an investigation ofacom oration with

nnnounced in hisspeech hisinquiry would includetheconnection ofthiscom oration to

Dom inican elections.Defendantshad transacted businessw ith the com pany.

12.Plaintiffisa residentofThe State ofN ew Y ork.

13.Ata1lrelevanttim es,defendantscollectively w ere and are a for-profitcom pany

organized and operating underthe lawsoftheStateofFlorida, with itsprincipalplaceof

differentnam es,itsm ostnotablecorporatemonikeris''The Partido Esperanza Dem octratica''

ceremonies.Since2014 theyhaveregistered overtwelvedifferentcorporatem onikersat

ww w.sunBiz.org astransacting businessatthatlocation.Forthepurposeofclearand concise

litigation,the combined corporationswillbereferredto asThe Partido EsperanzaDem ocratica

('P.E.D.''),orin mattersrelatingtothelaw 51-111withfullauthorityoversuchDefendants,

dom iniciliariesofFloridapursuantto 28 U.S.C.1332(c),withtheexceptionofYasserSerulle

Ferdinand,who is believed to be a residentofN ew Jersey.

15.A large num berofthe defendants are related to one another.